C. Barone Presentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

C. Barone Presentation Caterina Barone associate professor University of Padua Italy Greek tragedy and political debate: Peter Sellars and his provocations Introduction Greek Tragedy is a foundational element of western culture, and a powerful means of cultural penetration, even in societies far removed from ours: it offers unlimited angles for interpretation and it lends itself even to an instrumental use of its contents. From this perspective, within the vast panorama of the diaspora of Greek tragedy beyond the Mediterranean, I find the following phenomenon particularly deserving of attention: the reception and the usage of the material in the United States of America, starting from the 1980’s, as a form of cultural therapy in the treatment of war trauma in soldiers (starting with those returning from Vietnam). The impulse for this kind of approach came from the work of psychiatrist Jonathan Shay. Shay, studying Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), was the first who resorted to therapeutic reading of the Iliad, and later of the Odyssey, linking the battle-stories of patients monitored at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs with the war experiences described in Homeric poems. The Philoctetes Project, which involves the reutilisation of certain Greek tragedies oriented towards pacifism (such as The Trojan Women by Euripides, or The Persians by Aeschylus) was developed along similar lines. The project was the brainchild of theatrical director Brian Doerries, and it subsequently led to the creation of the national program Ancient Greeks/Modern Lives, devised by Peter Meineck, professor of Classics in the Modern World, and managed by the Aquila Theatre in New York. In parallel with the therapeutic usage of Greek tragedies (staged mainly in military bases, before an audience of soldiers, veterans, and their families) one can observe the rise of their function in denouncing war politically (Lauriola). This is done in a more specifically theatre-based manner, in relation to US interventions in conflicts in the Middle East, from the Gulf War in Iraq (1991), to Afghanistan (2001) and then again Iraq (2003). One of the directors who has been most involved in this kind of protest is Peter Sellars. In the span of 16 years, Sellars has produced his own personal trilogy, working, in succession, first with Sophocles’s Ajax (1986), then Aeschylus’s The Persians (1993), and finally widening his critical stance also to the welcoming of refugees, an issue treated in Euripides’s The Heracleidae (2002). Method Peter Sellars, as he himself often states, conceives his stagings starting from the tenet that theatre must be «a mirror to our society» and that art must be a social and moral action. His broad usage of the classics has therefore the aim of putting contemporary issues on the table for discussion (Willis Hoffman). Limiting our inquiry to Sellars’s work with Greek tragedy, the intention of the present study is twofold: to analyse to which extent the semantic richness of the original survives in a radical and antihistorical “contemporisation” of the mythic material, and to ascertain whether the contingency of contemporariness deprives ancient theatre of meaning by undermining its primeval and sacral force. Discussion Sellars has no iconoclastic intent in his approach. Employing Greek tragedies to make a distinctly political statement allows him to deal with uncomfortable topics, attracting the audience and at the same time raising their awareness and participation (Lichtenfelds). Doing theatre, for him, means exercising a form of democracy, as we are indeed also taught by 5th century Athenian theatre itself. The first tragedy Sellars worked with is Sophocles’s Ajax, during the 1986-87 theatrical season. It was Ronald Reagan with his foreign policy who convinced Sellars that it was morally imperative to make his voice heard against war, raising awareness in as many people as possible. He was motivated by the bombing carried out by the US air force in an attempt to eliminate Muammar Gheddafi in Libya. Several civilians died under those bombs, as well as one of the Libyan leader’s daughters. In Sellars’s reinterpretation of Ajax, adapted by Robert Auletta and set in the Pentagon, the Greek hero, driven mad by the loss of his τιµή, takes the shape of a US general who regrets his actions during a South American war of “liberation”, similar to the Vietnam War. He is determined, even at the cost of his own life, to reject the abuses of power of politicians, in a regime where propaganda and censorship tie a perverse and inextricable knot. The role of the protagonist is entrusted to Howie Seago, an expressive deaf actor: his speeches are held in sign language and verbalised by other actors. Athena appears as a judge in a court martial: she condemns the military man’s insubordination and she resorts to the investigative actions of Odysseus, while Menelaus and Agamemnon play the role of accusers. To broaden the scope of his protest, and to give a realistic portrayal of American society, Sellars chose a multi-ethnic cast: Tecmessa, Ajax’s slave and concubine, is Vietnamese; of the five actors dressed in military uniforms and forming the Chorus, three are black, one is Asian, and one is white. They also play the roles of Odysseus, Agamemnon, Menelaus, Teucer and the Messenger. Music is inspired by African-American spirituals and work songs. The staging of The Persians (1993) once again has a military setting, this time however in reference to the Gulf War of 1990-91, under George Bush senior: here the director denounces the imperialistic aspirations and the insincerity of the American government. In this case Sellars was spurred by his inner suffering in hearing of the conflict on CNN, and by his awareness of the fact that not everything was being shown, because of censorship. Sellars’s intent is to point to an analogy between the devastation wreaked by the invading Persian army lead by Xerxes, guilty of hybris, against the ancient Greeks, and the devastation of Iraq carried out by the US army. In order to physically involve the audience, Sellars uses strategically placed loudspeakers broadcasting sounds of war and the noise of New York traffic, creating an intentional auditory contrast with the music played on the oud by Nubian artist Hamza El Din. Martinus Miroto, a dancer from the island of Java, with his intense movements, injects the show with an archaic spirituality, reminiscent of magical rites of possession. Dressed in a military uniform, his face covered by a mask, Miroto hosts in his body the spirit of the dead Iraqi soldiers. But the show has been deemed by some critics as too didactic and partisan in offering a sympathetic portrayal of the enemy. It has also been deemed artistically unresolved, in aspects including the tragic figure of Xerses, rendered by John Ortiz as «a cross between Saddam Hussein and LA gang leader» (Drake). Similar limitations can be observed in Heracleidae, chosen by Sellars in order to link the vicissitudes faced by the children of Heracles, persecuted by king Eurystheus, with those faced by current refugees, forced by wars and vexations to leave their country in search of a land where they can live. The degree of realism in this staging is driven to the point that it includes even the presence of actual refugees on the stage, while the articulation of theatrical moments is devised by Sellars so as to create a sort of «public forum on matters of social importance». The show went on a long tour of America and Europe, taking different shapes depending on the location where it was performed. In Rome, where I had the chance to see the play in 2002, it was divided in three parts. First, a meeting with two refugees, interviewed by persons actively engaged in this field: journalists, writers, NGO workers. Then a break, a convivial moment of sorts, devoted to the exchange of opinions, while tea is served to the audience and the young non-Europeans climb down from the stage to shake hands with spectators. Thereafter, the staging of the tragedy proper begins. The actors wear modern and heterogeneous clothes: the old Iolaus, on a wheelchair, wears a sober suit; Alcmena wears a chador; Demophon, transformed by Sellars into a female president, sports a grey suit and a pearl necklace; Macaria wears a long white coat reaching over his trousers; the servant is a black soldier wearing camouflage. The original choruses have been eliminated, and substituted with folk- chants from Kazakhstan, sung live and accompanied on the lute by female musician Ulzhan Baibussynova, who wears the folk-dress of her country. The function of the Greek chorus is instead entrusted to a single actor, who delivers a critical commentary of sorts. When Eurystheus is introduced, he stands escorted before the audience who will judge him, and he wears the orange suit of Guantanamo prisoners. He is blindfolded and his feet are shackled, as he assumes his position in front of a Plexiglas stand, as if he were a witness in front of a committee of enquiry. He speaks in a microphone, like “presidentess” Demophon and other characters. The microphone is repeatedly employed: in Sellars’s theatrical vision it has the same function as the mask: «It is, so to say, the mask of our society». The finale of the tragedy features an unexpected reversal of roles: one of the persecuted, Alcmena, Heracles’s mother, cruelly demands the death of Eurystheus, the persecutor, and she demands that his body be thrown to the dogs, thus subverting the norms of justice and pietas she had earlier invoked for herself and her grandchildren. The Athenians, in their turn, state that it is not fair to kill an enemy who has been caught alive in battle, but they nevertheless do not prevent Eurystheus’s execution: violence prevails, and will prevail in the future too, as indicated by the prophecy of a coming war between Athens and Argo.
Recommended publications
  • Trojan Women: Introduction
    Trojan Women: Introduction 1. Gods in the Trojan Women Two gods take the stage in the prologue to Trojan Women. Are these gods real or abstract? In the prologue, with its monologue by Poseidon followed by a dialogue between the master of the sea and Athena, we see them as real, as actors (perhaps statelier than us, and accoutered with their traditional props, a trident for the sea god, a helmet for Zeus’ daughter). They are otherwise quite ordinary people with their loves and hates and with their infernal flexibility whether moral or emotional. They keep their emotional side removed from humans, distance which will soon become physical. Poseidon cannot stay in Troy, because the citizens don’t worship him any longer. He may feel sadness or regret, but not mourning for the people who once worshiped but now are dead or soon to be dispersed. He is not present for the destruction of the towers that signal his final absence and the diaspora of his Phrygians. He takes pride in the building of the walls, perfected by the use of mason’s rules. After the divine departures, the play proceeds to the inanition of his and Apollo’s labor, with one more use for the towers before they are wiped from the face of the earth. Nothing will be left. It is true, as Hecuba claims, her last vestige of pride, the name of Troy remains, but the place wandered about throughout antiquity and into the modern age. At the end of his monologue Poseidon can still say farewell to the towers.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Women of Troy' Euripides Subverts the Ancient Greek
    In his play ‘The Women of Troy’ Euripides subverts the ancient Greek idea of heroism and brutally strips away heroic illusions surrounding the glory of battle. Whilst Euripides suggests that women and children are victims of war, his overarching critique on the destructive, means that the play portrays all characters as victims, including belligerents. As a powerful protest against imperialistic war common in ancient Greece and a warning against waging war, as the Greeks were preparing to do in Sicily, the play radically focuses on the immense anguish of the Trojan women. The death of the children is used to by Euripides to brutally expose the devastating impacts of war on those who are innocent and powerless. However Euripides inclusion of the suffering of the Greek soldiers displays how women and children are not the only victims of war, which is universally destructive in nature. The torment of the Trojan women is the focal point of the play as Euripides emphasises their abject misery relentlessly throughout the play. This is initially evident in the prologue where Hecuba, the “true face of misery”, laments her downfall from queen to slave and sarcastically describes her now being “throned in the dust”, highlighting to the readership her loss of status and all worldly possessions. Through Hecuba, Euripides illustrates the women’s grief using brutal and sensory imagery as she state her desire to “plough my face with my nails until the wrinkles run red”. Euripides poignantly connects he emotional pain to her physical pain to present the magnitude of her suffering in a way that is conceivable to the audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Characters, Female Sympathetic Choruses, and the “Suppression” of Antiphonal Lament at the Openings of Euripides’ Phaethon, Andromeda, and Hypsipyle*
    FRAMMENTI SULLA SCENA (ONLINE) Studi sul dramma antico frammentario Università deGli Studi di Torino Centro Studi sul Teatro Classico http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/fss www.teatroclassico.unito.it ISSN 2612-3908 1 • 2020 FEMALE CHARACTERS, FEMALE SYMPATHETIC CHORUSES, AND THE “SUPPRESSION” OF ANTIPHONAL LAMENT AT THE OPENINGS OF EURIPIDES’ PHAETHON, ANDROMEDA, AND HYPSIPYLE* VASILIKI KOUSOULINI NATIONAL AND KAPODISTRIAN UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS [email protected] Female choruses abound in Euripides’ plays.1 While there are many in his extant plays, we also encounter choruses of women in his fragmentary ones.2 Little attention has been paid to the existence of sympathetic female choruses in Euripides’ fragmentary dramas and their in- teraction with female characters. A sympathetic female chorus seems to appear in conjunction with a female character in many Euripidean fragmentary plays. The chorus of the Alexander in * This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Opera- tional ProGramme «Human Resources Development, Education and LifelonG LearninG» in the context of the pro- ject “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers - 2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholar- ships Foundation (ΙΚΥ). 1 There is a female chorus in Euripides’ Medea, Hippolytus, Andromache, Hecuba, Suppliant Women, Ion, Electra, Trojan Women, Iphigenia among the Taurians, Helen, Phoenician Women, Orestes, Iphigenia in Aulis, and Bacchae. Mastronarde observed that there are 15 male choruses, 62 female choruses, and 105 choruses with undetermined gender in Euripides’ corpus. Cf. MASTRONARDE 2010, 103. AccordinG to Calame, the 82% of Euripides’ traGic choruses con- sists of women. Cf. CALAME 2020, 776.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT a Director's Approach to Euripides' Hecuba Christopher F. Peck, M.F.A. Mentor: Deanna Toten Beard, Ph.D. This Thesi
    ABSTRACT A Director’s Approach to Euripides’ Hecuba Christopher F. Peck, M.F.A. Mentor: DeAnna Toten Beard, Ph.D. This thesis explores a production of Euripides’ Hecuba as it was directed by Christopher Peck. Chapter One articulates a unique Euripidean dramatic structure to demonstrate the contemporary viability of Euripides’ play. Chapter Two utilizes this dramatic structure as the basis for an aggressive analysis of themes inherent in the production. Chapter Three is devoted to the conceptualization of this particular production and the relationship between the director and the designers in pursuit of this concept. Chapter Four catalogs the rehearsal process and how the director and actors worked together to realize the dramatic needs of the production. Finally Chapter Five is a postmortem of the production emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of the final product of Baylor University’s Hecuba. A Director's Approach to Euripides' Hecuba by Christopher F. Peck, B.F.A A Thesis Approved by the Department of Theatre Arts Stan C. Denman, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee DeAnna Toten Beard, Ph.D., Chairperson David J. Jortner, Ph.D. Marion D. Castleberry, Ph.D. Steven C. Pounders, M.F.A. Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2013 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2013 by Christopher F. Peck
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Transcript
    TRANSCRIPT Key Conversations with Phi Beta Kappa Classics Scholar Peter Meineck on How Greek Theater Trains Better Citizens The NYU's professor elaborates on how to better understand and live through today's social and moral turmoil by learning from the great theater works of antiquity. Meineck illustrates what Greek drama can teach us about understanding trauma, being informed voters, embracing difference, and what we should, and shouldn't, expect from leaders and heroes. Fred Lawrence: This podcast episode was generously funded by two anonymous donors. If you would like to support the podcast in similar ways, please contact Hadley Kelly, at [email protected]. Thanks for listening. Hello and welcome to Key Conversations with Phi Beta Kappa. I’m Fred Lawrence, Secretary and CEO of the Phi Beta Kappa Society. On our podcast, we welcome leading thinkers, visionaries, and artists who shape our collective understanding of some of today’s most pressing and consequential matters. Many of them are Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholars, who travel the country for us, visiting campuses and presenting free lectures that we invite you to attend. For the Visiting Scholars schedule, please visit pbk.org. Today, it’s a pleasure to welcome Dr. Peter Meineck, who holds the endowed chair of Professor of Classics in the Modern World at New York University, and is Honorary Professor of Humanities at the University of Nottingham in the UK. He specializes in ancient performance, cognitive theory, Greek literature and culture, and humanities public programming. In addition to his academic career, Dr. Meineck has worked extensively in professional theatre, founding Aquila Theatre, and has directed and produced over 50 productions of classical plays.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cciv/Clas/Thea 202: Tu/Th 10:30-11:50 Fisk
    CCIV/CLAS/THEA 202: GREEK DRAMA PASSIONS AND POLITICS ON THE ATHENIAN AND MODERN STAGE SPRING 2014 TU/TH 10:30-11:50 FISK 210 Professor Eirene Visvardi [email protected] Downey 213 Office Hours: Monday 2:00-4:00 and by appointment This course will introduce students to Greek drama as produced in its original setting and adapted in modern times. Our Greek material will include tragedies by Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides along with selections from Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Poetics and Nicomachean Ethics among other texts. We will consider issues such as: What kind of artistic medium is theater when it first comes to life? What would the experience of performing and watching Greek tragedy have been like? What are the emotions of tragedy for the fictional characters and for the audience and why have we been talking about catharsis for centuries? What is the relationship between emotion and decision-making, between feeling and judging - for individuals and for groups? How does theater reflect the personal, social, religious, and political life of the Athenians? Are stage and (democratic) state in dialogue? For the last part of the course, we will turn to adaptations of Greek tragedy in the 17th-21st centuries to examine how similar questions/issues are replayed and revised in response to changing social and political circumstances such as the Second World War, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and immigration and homelessness in contemporary NYC among others. REQUIRED TEXTS P. Woodruff (1998) Euripides Bacchae. Hackett P. Burian and A. Shapiro (2011) The Complete Aeschylus: Volume I: The Oresteia (Greek Tragedy in New Translations).
    [Show full text]
  • Sidney's 'Defence of Poetry', Written in 1581, and the First Important Piece of Literary Criticism in English
    Trojan Suffering, Tragic Gods and Transhistorical Metaphysics The Greek, decisive confrontation with the daemonic world-order gives to tragic poetry its historico-philosophical signature. Walter Benjamin1 The Reasons for Suffering When Philip Sidney defended theatre in the first substantial example of literary criticism in the English language, his Defence of Poetry (1581), he used a story from ancient Greece to illustrate tragedy's emotive power: Plutarch yielded a notable testimony of the abominable tyrant Alexander Pheraeus; from whose eyes a tragedy, well made and represented, drew abundance of tears, who without all pity had murdered infinite numbers, and some of his own blood; so as he that was not ashamed to make matters for tragedies, yet could not resist the sweet violence of a tragedy. And if it wrought no farther good in him, it was that he, in despite of himself, withdrew himself from hearkening to that which might mollify his hardened heart.2 Sidney was struck that Alexander of Pherae, a wicked Greek tyrant of the 4th century BCE, was induced to weep by 'the sweet violence of a tragedy'. Indeed, the emotion so overpowered Alexander that he had to absent himself, for fear that his hardened heart could be made capable of pity. The tragedy which upset the tyrant was Euripides' Trojan Women, as we know from the passage in Plutarch where Sidney had found it (see below). The sufferings that Alexander could not bear to watch were those of Hecuba and 1 Andromache, women who lost their families at Troy. Trojan Women constitutes an extended lament and searing statement of the philosophical incomprehensibility of human suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides' Iphigenia: Ancient Victim, Modern Greek Heroine?
    ARTIGO Recebido em 8/8/2019 Aprovado em 19/11/2019 Euripides’ Iphigenia: Ancient Victim, Modern Greek Heroine?1 Ifigênia de Eurípides: vítima antiga, heroína grega moderna?2 Anastasia Bakogianni3 e-mail: [email protected] orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-642X DOI: https://doi.org/10.25187/codex.v7i2.30457 ABSTRACT: In his Aristotle dismisses RESUMO: Em sua , Aristóteles descarta a Poetics Poética Iphigenia’s characterisation as inconsistent. Why does caracterização de Ifigênia como inconsistente. Por que the eponymous heroine of change a heroína homônima de muda de Iphigenia at Aulis Ifigênia em Áulis her mind and decide to die willingly? This central ideia e decide morrer espontaneamente? Essa questão question has preoccupied not only classical scholars, central preocupou não apenas estudiosos clássicos, mas but receiving artists, too. How Iphigenia’s change of também artistas de recepção. Como a mudança da heart in portrayed on stage and screen affects the atitude de Ifigênia, retratada no palco e na tela, afeta a audience’s response to the character. Is Iphigenia a resposta do público à personagem? Ifigênia é uma victim or a heroine (or a mixture of both)? The vítima ou uma heroína (ou uma mistura de ambas)? O Greek-Cypriot filmmaker Michael Cacoyannis cineasta greco-cipriota Michael Cocayannis acreditava believed he enjoyed a special relationship with ter um relacionamento especial com Eurípides, mas Euripides, but his interpretation was shaped by sua interpretação foi moldada por eventos políticos na political events in Modern Greece and Cyprus in the Grécia moderna e em Chipre nas décadas de 1960 e 1960s and 70s.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL WOODRUFF 1965 AB in Classics
    PAUL WOODRUFF CURRICULUM VITAE (January 2018) EDUCATION 1965 A.B. in Classics, Princeton University 1968 B.A. in Literae Humaniores, Oxford University (Merton College) 1973 Ph.D. in Philosophy, Princeton University Dissertation: "The Euthyphro and the Hippias Major: Two Studies in Socratic Dialectic," supervised by Gregory Vlastos EMPLOYMENT 1969-1971 U.S. Army, discharged with rank of Captain 1973- Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS 1976-78, 1979-81 Assistant Chairman, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1987-88 Graduate Adviser, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1988-1991 Chairman, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1991-2006 Director, Plan II Honors Program, The University of Texas at Austin 2006-2012 Dean of Undergraduate Studies The University of Texas at Austin OTHER SERVICE 1985-87 President, Phi Beta Kappa, Chapter A of Texas 1990-92 Chair, Mellon Fellowship Program, Southwest Region 1990-94 Vice-President, Institute for the Humanities at Salado 1992-93 Chair, American Philosophical Association Program Committee, Central Division 1992-97 Chair, Rhodes-Marshall Review Committee, The University of Texas at Austin 1996-97 Chair, Faculty Council, The University of Texas at Austin 1997 Convened conference on Reason and Religion in Fifth-Century Greece in Austin 2010-12 Executive Board Member, The Reinvention Center. AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS 1965-1968 Marshall Scholarship PAUL WOODRUFF, CURRICULUM VITAE PAGE 2 1978-1979 Junior Fellowship, The Center for Hellenic Studies 1983 Austin Book Award 1984-1985 Research Fellowship, National Endowment for the Humanities Summer, 1986 Grant to teach a seminar for college teachers, N.E.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquila Theatre's Mission Is to Make Classical Works
    Aquila Theatre’s mission is to make classical works accessible to the greatest number. A play becomes ‘classical’ because we recognize that after a time it transcends the original culture it was created for. It retains the power to provoke the central question of what it means to be human. As a company dedicated to the classics, we feel a responsibility to acknowledge and explore newfound classical works. Aquila was founded in London in 1991 by Peter Meineck. In 1997, Aquila became a US non-for-profit organization and is currently based in New York. Aquila’s programs include: PRODUCTIONS IN NEW YORK CITY: Aquila is a major part of New York's theatrical landscape, producing a regular season of plays. Aquila recently produced: The Trojan War: Our Warrior Chorus, based on the writings of Homer, Aeschylus, Euripides, Sophocles and reimagined through the experiences of modern day military veterans at Brooklyn Academy of Music; Romeo and Juliet, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Philoctetes at GK ArtsCenter in Brooklyn, a staged workshop production of A Female Philoctetes at BAM Fisher’s Hillman Studio as part of our YouStories program, Euripides’ Herakles at BAM, Shakespeare’s Macbeth at the GYM at Judson, Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Pirandello’s Six Characters in Search of an Author, Shakespeare’s As You Like It and Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People at the Skirball Center for the Performing Arts at New York University, and Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 and Homer’s The Iliad: Book One Off-Broadway at the Lucille Lortel Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • S. Sara Monoson [email protected] Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 (Abbreviated, February 2018)
    S. Sara Monoson [email protected] Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 (abbreviated, February 2018) Current Position at Northwestern Professor of Political Science, Classics and Philosophy Chair of the Department of Political Scienc Director of the Graduate Classics Cluster Prior Positions Chair, Department of Classics, Northwestern University, 2004-07, 2008-11 Associate Professor of Political Science and Classics, Northwestern University, 2001-2012 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Northwestern University, 1993-2000 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1991-93 Research Assistant, Presidency Research Center, Princeton University, 1990-91 Scholarly Specializations History of political thought, Greek political philosophy, democratic theory, politics in the ancient world, classical receptions methodology, reception of Greek political thought in American political discourse. Education Ph.D., Politics and Program Political Philosophy, Princeton University. 1993 M.Sc. Political Philosophy, London School of Economics & Political Science. Awarded with Distinction. 1982 B.A., Brandeis University. Awarded with Highest Honors in Social & Political Thought, Phi Beta Kappa. 1981 Ancient Greek, The Latin/Greek Institute, The Graduate Center, CUNY. 1979 Research Books • Plato's Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy, Princeton University Press, 2000. Awarded “Best First Book Prize” by the Foundations Section of the American Political Science Association, 2001 • Socrates in the Vernacular (under contract, Harvard University Press) • Roadmap to Plato’s Republic, manuscript in preparation Journal articles, book chapters, white papers • "Socrates’ Military Service", in Our Ancient Wars, edited by Victor Caston and Silke- Maria Weineck, University of Michigan Press, 2016. • "Aesop Said So: Ancient Wisdom and Radical Politics in 1930s NY,” Classical Receptions Journal, 2016, Vol 8, Issue 1 (2016), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Troy Myth and Reality
    Part 1 Large print exhibition text Troy myth and reality Please do not remove from the exhibition This two-part guide provides all the exhibition text in large print. There are further resources available for blind and partially sighted people: Audio described tours for blind and partially sighted visitors, led by the exhibition curator and a trained audio describer will explore highlight objects from the exhibition. Tours are accompanied by a handling session. Booking is essential (£7.50 members and access companions go free) please contact: Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7323 8971 Thursday 12 December 2019 14.00–17.00 and Saturday 11 January 2020 14.00–17.00 1 There is also an object handling desk at the exhibition entrance that is open daily from 11.00 to 16.00. For any queries about access at the British Museum please email [email protected] 2 Sponsor’sThe Trojan statement War For more than a century BP has been providing energy to advance human progress. Today we are delighted to help you learn more about the city of Troy through extraordinary artefacts and works of art, inspired by the stories of the Trojan War. Explore the myth, archaeology and legacy of this legendary city. BP believes that access to arts and culture helps to build a more inspired and creative society. That’s why, through 23 years of partnership with the British Museum, we’ve helped nearly five million people gain a deeper understanding of world cultures with BP exhibitions, displays and performances. Our support for the arts forms part of our wider contribution to UK society and we hope you enjoy this exhibition.
    [Show full text]