Amended Class Action Complaint
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Case 2:09-cv-01479-ROS Document 30 Filed 09/27/10 Page 1 of 41 1 TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. Richard G. Himelrick, Arizona Bar #004738 2 J. James Christian, Arizona Bar #023614 Third Floor Camelback Esplanade II 3 2525 East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4237 4 Tel: (602) 255-6000 Fax: (602) 255-0103 5 [email protected]; [email protected] 6 SAXENA WHITE P.A. Maya Saxena 7 Joseph E. White, III Christopher S. Jones 8 Lester R. Hooker 2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 257 9 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel: (561) 394-3399 10 Fax: (561) 394-3082 11 Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 12 [Additional counsel appear on signature page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 15 DAVID SHAPIRO, Individually and On Behalf 16 Of All Others Similarly Situated, No. CV-09-1479-PHX-ROS 17 Plaintiff, Amended Class Action 18 Complaint for Violation of v. 19 the Federal Securities Laws MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., WILLIAM J. 20 HEMELT, SAMUEL C. COWLEY, TIMOTHY Jury Trial Demanded 21 L. CLAROT, and CARL J. JOHNSON, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 Lead Plaintiff Axel Alegre de La Soujeole (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf 26 of all other persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities issued by 27 Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (“Matrixx” or the “Company”) between December 22, 2007 and 28 June 15, 2009 (the “Class Period”), by his undersigned attorneys, alleges the following 1 Case 2:09-cv-01479-ROS Document 30 Filed 09/27/10 Page 2 of 41 1 upon personal knowledge as to allegations specifically pertaining to himself and his own 2 acts, and upon information and belief and in reliance on the investigation of counsel as to 3 all other matters. 4 Plaintiff’s information and belief is based on his investigation (made by and 5 through his attorneys), which investigation included, among other things, a review and 6 analysis of: (a) public documents pertaining to Defendants (as defined herein); (b) 7 Matrixx’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); (c) press 8 releases published by Matrixx; (d) Matrixx conference calls; (e) analyst reports 9 concerning the Company; and (f) newspaper and magazine articles (and other media 10 coverage) regarding Matrixx and its business. 11 I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 12 1. This is a federal securities class action brought on behalf of all purchasers 13 of the common stock of Matrixx who purchased the Company’s common stock during 14 the Class Period, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 (the “Exchange Act”). 16 2. Matrixx is a nutrient and drug delivery company that develops, 17 manufactures and markets delivery systems for bioactive compounds. The Company, 18 through its subsidiary, Zicam, LLC, produced, marketed and sold, among other 19 pharmaceutical products, Zicam Cold Remedy nasal gel, Zicam Cold Remedy gel swabs, 20 and Zicam Cold Remedy children’s swabs (“Zicam Cold Remedy Products”). 21 3. During the Class Period, Matrixx sold the Zicam Cold Remedy Products 22 over-the-counter without a prescription for the purpose of combating the symptoms and 23 duration of the common cold. As detailed below, the Zicam Cold Remedy Products are 24 nonprescription drugs subject to certain U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) 25 regulations requiring the Company to submit to the FDA any reports of serious adverse 26 events involving the products. 27 4. Unbeknownst to investors, Matrixx had received hundreds of consumer 28 complaints of serious adverse events involving the loss of smell—also known as 2 Case 2:09-cv-01479-ROS Document 30 Filed 09/27/10 Page 3 of 41 1 anosmia—after using the Zicam Cold Remedy Products, and the Company failed to 2 submit these reports to the FDA in violation of FDA regulations. The FDA’s Center for 3 Drug Evaluation and Research and Office of Compliance explained the serious nature of 4 anosmia in a March 11, 2009, memorandum authored by Charles E. Lee, M.D.: 5 Loss of sense of smell may have serious consequences. Patients with 6 anosmia may not be able to detect the smell of a gas leak, smoke, or spoiled food. Loss of taste (ageusia) may accompany anosmia, and may have a 7 major impact on the patient’s quality of life. Anosmia and ageusia may have a significant occupational impact for those employed in the culinary 8 professions. Finally, patients who develop anosmia may be subject to 9 adverse events from diagnostic tests or procedures, such as MRI or CT scans conducted with radiocontrast media, to determine its cause. 10 11 5. The investing public did not become aware of this adverse material 12 information until the Company disclosed that, on or about June 16, 2009, it had received 13 a warning letter from the FDA (the “FDA Warning Letter”) in which the FDA informed 14 Matrixx of several violations involving the Zicam Cold Remedy Products, as detailed 15 below. 16 6. The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed 17 to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s operational well-being and future 18 prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose or indicate that: (1) Matrixx had 19 received notice of hundreds of serious adverse events regarding the Zicam Cold Remedy 20 Products; (2) Matrixx failed to report these incidents to the FDA despite having an 21 obligation to do so; (3) the Company failed to comply with FDA regulations despite 22 repeated assurances of its compliance; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s 23 statements about its meeting FDA regulations were false and misleading when made. 24 7. As a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts, false and misleading statements 25 and omissions, which directly caused the precipitous decline in the market value of the 26 Company’s securities, Plaintiff and other Class members have suffered significant losses 27 and damages. 28 3 Case 2:09-cv-01479-ROS Document 30 Filed 09/27/10 Page 4 of 41 1 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2 8. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to §§ 10(b) and 20(a) 3 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78(i)(b), 78(t) and 78t-1(a). 4 9. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 5 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because this action arises under the laws of the United States. 6 10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over this action because Matrixx does 7 business in this District and maintains its corporate headquarters in this District. 8 11. In connection with the acts and omissions alleged in this complaint, 9 Defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate 10 commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications, 11 and the facilities of the national securities markets. 12 III. PARTIES 13 12. Plaintiff purchased the publicly traded securities of Matrixx at artificially 14 inflated prices during the Class Period and has been damaged thereby, as set forth in his 15 certification which has previously been filed in this litigation and is incorporated by 16 reference. 17 13. Defendant Matrixx is a Delaware corporation and maintains its principal 18 executive offices at 8515 East Anderson Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85255. Matrixx engages 19 in the development, production, marketing, and sale of over-the-counter (“OTC”) 20 healthcare products. The Company’s common stock traded on the NASDAQ exchange 21 under the symbol “MTXX” at all relevant times during the Class Period. 22 14. Defendant William J. Hemelt (“Hemelt”) has served as the Acting 23 President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 24 October 2008. Hemelt joined the Company in June 1998 as Chief Financial Officer, 25 Treasurer, and Secretary. He served as Secretary until February 2005 and Treasurer until 26 July 2007. 27 15. Defendant Samuel C. Cowley (“Cowley”) has served as the Executive Vice 28 President, Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company since 4 Case 2:09-cv-01479-ROS Document 30 Filed 09/27/10 Page 5 of 41 1 May 2008. Cowley has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company 2 since July 2005. 3 16. Defendant Timothy L. Clarot (“Clarot”) has served as Vice President, 4 Research and Development of the Company since January 2004. Clarot previously 5 served as Director, Research and Development from June 2003 through January 2004, 6 and as Director of Operations from 2001 through June 2003. He joined the Company in 7 1999. 8 17. Defendant Carl J. Johnson (“Johnson”) served as President and Chief 9 Executive Officer of the Company from July 2001 until his retirement on October 31, 10 2008. Johnson served as a consultant of the Company following his retirement. 11 18. Defendants Hemelt, Cowley, Clarot and Johnson are collectively referred to 12 herein as the “Individual Defendants.” The Individual Defendants, together with the 13 Company, are collectively referred to herein as “Defendants.” 14 19. During the Class Period, the Individual Defendants, as senior executive 15 officers and/or directors of Matrixx, were privy to confidential, proprietary and material 16 adverse non-public information concerning the Company, its operations, finances, 17 financial condition and present and future business prospects via access to internal 18 corporate documents, conversations and connections with other corporate officers and 19 employees, attendance at management and/or board of directors meetings and 20 committees, and via reports and other information provided to them. Because of their 21 possession of such information, the Individual Defendants knew or recklessly disregarded 22 that the facts related to Zicam had not been disclosed to, and were being concealed from, 23 shareholders and the investing public.