DOCSLIB.ORG

Judith Rich Harris; No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality; W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judith Rich Harris; No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality; W 9780393079517; Judith Rich Harris; No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality; W. W. Norton & Company, 2010; 352 pages; 2010 No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences Sociobiological Perspectives on Human Development Parenting and the Child's World Why Parents Matter Social and Personality Development Evolutionary Criminology Dowload and Read Online Free Ebook No Two Alike Human Nature And Human Individuality. Available link of PDF No Two Alike Human Nature And Human Individuality. No Two Alike: Human Natur has been added to your Cart. Add to Cart. Turn on 1-Click ordering for this browser. The history of the science upon which she draws is full of strong personalities and opinions, drawing on and shaping the intellectual currents of their times: Galton, with his belief that human ability and character were inherited; Skinner and Watson, who believed in the potency of environmental interventions and the malleability of human nature (a belief shared by generations of educators). This is the baggage Harris asks you to throw aside. Neither Galton's nor Skinner's model comes close to explaining human nature as we experience it. What, then, does? Read and Download Ebook No Two Alike: Human Nature And Human Individuality PDF Public Ebook Library. Harrisâ™s last chapter lays out her theory in tabular form, explaining how each module interacts with the others to produce our distinct personalities. It is lavishly footnoted, like the rest of the book, shoring up her strategy of pointing out the failings of other models and then proposing her own. Why no two people are alike. Harris turns out to be well suited for the role of detectiveâ•it isn't easy to pull the wool over her eyes. Her solution is a startlingly original one: the first completely new theory of personality since Freud's. Based on a principle of evolutionary psychologyâ•the idea that the human mind is a toolbox of special-purpose devicesâ•Harris's theory explains how attributes we all have in common can make us different. This is the story of a scientific quest, but it is also the personal story of a courageous and innovative woman who refused to be satisfied with "what everyone knows is true." Monogenism or Polygenism The Question of Human NOTE Today we finish our two part series by Dr Edward Feser exploring questions about evolution, creation, faith, and human origins You can read the first part here. III Of Individuality, as One of the Elements of Well John Stuart Mill .On Liberty Chapter III Of Individuality, as One of the Elements of Well Being HD BIBLICAL VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE HD Home THE BIBLICAL VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE Part Part The belief in conscious life after death is one of the greatest deception of our times Such a belief is. No Two Alike expands on some of the ideas from her previous book The Nurture Assumption, especially the effect of birth order on personality and criticism of developmental psychology. She also attempts to answer some of the criticisms leveled at The Nurture Assumption. Harris proposes that three distinct mental systems shape personality: A relationship system that allows us to distinguish family from strangers and tell individuals apart. ^ "Investigating the mystery of individuality. A review of Judith Rich Harris, No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality" (PDF). http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep067779.pdf. Retrieved 2011-05-25. ^ "No Two Alike website (Judith Rich Harris)". Judithrichharris.info. http://judithrichharris.info/n2a/#rev. Click Download or Read Online button to get No Two Alike Human Nature And Human Individuality book pdf book now. No Two Alike Human Nature and Human Individuality. Author: Judith Rich Harris Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company ISBN: 0393079511 Format: PDF, Docs Download Now A groundbreaking theory of personality. It can't just be "nature and nurture," because even identical twins who grow up togetherâ”same genes, same parentsâ”have different personalities. And if psychologists can't explain why identical twins are different, they also can't explain why each of us differs from everyone else. Why no two people are alike. Harris turns out to be well suited for the role of detectiveâ”it isn't easy to pull the wool over her eyes. No Two Alike Author Judith Rich HarrisPublisher W.W. NortonPublication date 2006ISBN 978-0-393-05948-9 No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individual. Harris proposes that three distinct mental systems shape personality: A relationship system that allows us to distinguish family from strangers and tell individuals apart. A socialization system that helps us to become members of a group and absorb the group's culture. A status system that enables us to acquire self- knowledge by measuring ourselves against others..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brain, Psyche, and Self: a Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience
    BRAIN, PSYCHE, AND SELF: A DIALECTIC BETWEEN ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE A dissertation submitted by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN to PACIFICA GRADUATE INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in DEPTH PSYCHOLOGY This dissertation has been accepted for the faculty of Pacifica Graduate Institute by: •ennis P. Slattery, Chair Jennifer L.~Selig, Reader (/tyjz Susan E. Mehrtens, PhD External Reader UMI Number: 3519792 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. DiygrMution UMI 3519792 Published by ProQuest LLC 2012. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii JANUARY 25, 2011 Copyright by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN 2011 iii ABSTRACT Brain, Psyche, and Self: A Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience by Kesstan Blandin Although much of C. G. Jung's work is not compatible with neuroscientific methods or perspectives, his ideas on the structure of the psyche and self overlap with attempts to understand the phenomenon of a self in consciousness through mapping correlates with brain functions and processes. They are therefore appropriate to engage in dialogue with neuroscience. Through these dialogues we can further understand the construction of the self and identity in light of current findings in neuroscience and the theories of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and Child Development by Malcolm Gladwell
    August 17, 1998 The New Yorker ANNALS OF BEHAVIOR Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and child development by Malcolm Gladwell 1. The idea that will make Judith Rich Harris famous came to her, unbidden, on the afternoon of January 20, 1994. At the time, Harris was a textbook writer, with no doctorate or academic affiliation, working from her home in suburban New Jersey. Because of a lupus-like illness, she doesn’t have the strength to leave the house, and she’d spent that morning in bed. By early afternoon, though, she was at her desk, glancing through a paper by a prominent psychologist about juvenile delinquency, and for some reason a couple of unremarkable sentences struck her as odd: “Delinquency must be a social behavior that allows access to some desirable resource. I suggest that the resource is mature status, with its consequent power and privilege.” It is an observation consistent with our ideas about what it means to grow up. Teen-agers rebel against being teen-agers, against the restrictions imposed on them by adults. They smoke because only adults are supposed to smoke. They steal cars because they are too young to have cars. But Harris was suddenly convinced that the paper had it backward. “Adolescents aren’t trying to be like adults--they are trying to contrast themselves with adults,” she explains. “And it was as if a light had gone on in the sky. It was one of the most exciting things that have ever happened to me. In a minute or two, I had the germ of the theory, and in ten minutes I had enough of it to see that it was important.” If adolescents didn’t want to be like adults, it was because they wanted to be like other adolescents.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes Et Al
    DEMONSTRATING THE VALIDITY OF TWIN RESEARCH IN CRIMINOLOGY∗ J. C. BARNES,1 JOHN PAUL WRIGHT,1,6 BRIAN B. BOUTWELL,2 JOSEPH A. SCHWARTZ,3 ERIC J. CONNOLLY,4 JOSEPH L. NEDELEC,1 and KEVIN M. BEAVER5,6 1School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati 2School of Social Work, Saint Louis University 3School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska at Omaha 4Criminal Justice Department, Pennsylvania State University, Abington 5College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University 6Center for Social and Humanities Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia KEYWORDS: assumptions, behavior genetics, biosocial, empirical, quantitative, twins In a recent article published in Criminology, Burt and Simons (2014) claimed that the statistical violations of the classical twin design render heritability studies useless. Claiming quantitative genetics is “fatally flawed” and describing the results generated from these models as “preposterous,” Burt and Simons took the unprecedented step to call for abandoning heritability studies and their constituent findings. We show that their call for an “end to heritability studies” was premature, misleading, and entirely without merit. Specifically, we trace the history of behavioral genetics and show that 1) the Burt and Simons critique dates back 40 years and has been subject to a broad array of empirical investigations, 2) the violation of assumptions in twin models does not in- validate their results, and 3) Burt and Simons created a distorted and highly misleading portrait of behavioral genetics and those who use quantitative genetic approaches. “The flaws of twin studies are not fatal, but rather seem no worse (and may be better) than the flaws of the typical causal study that relies on observational data.” (Felson, 2012: ii) Behavioral genetic research has existed for more than 100 years (Maxson, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Todd K. Shackelford, Ph.D. Curriculum Vita: April 1, 2016 Oakland
    Todd K. Shackelford, Ph.D. Curriculum Vita: April 1, 2016 Oakland University Department of Psychology 112 Pryale Hall Rochester, Michigan 48309-4401 Email: [email protected] Office: 248-370-2285 Fax: 248-370-4612 Web: www.ToddKShackelford.com EDUCATION Ph.D., The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology: 1997 Area concentration: Evolutionary Psychology M.A., The University of Michigan, Psychology: 1995 Secondary concentration in Multivariate Statistics B.A., The University of New Mexico, Psychology: 1993 Summa Cum Laude, with Honors in Psychology EMPLOYMENT 2016-Present Distinguished Professor and Chair of Psychology Oakland University 2010-2016 Professor and Chair of Psychology Founding Co-Chair, Ph.D. and M.S. Programs in Psychology (2012) Founding Member, Center for Social and Behavioral Research (2011) Oakland University 2007-2010 Professor of Psychology Founder and Chair, Ph.D. Program in Evolutionary Psychology Florida Atlantic University 2002-2007 Associate Professor of Psychology Founder and Chair, Ph.D. Program in Evolutionary Psychology Co-Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Psychology (2002-2005) Florida Atlantic University 1997-2002 Assistant Professor of Psychology Florida Atlantic University LOCAL, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL HONORS AND AWARDS Member, Standing Review Board, Hong Kong Humanities and Social Sciences Panel of the Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (appointed 2015). Member, Thomson Reuters Expert Witness Services network (admitted 2014) Advisory Board Member, Center for Science and Reason. Appointed by Center officers and membership (2012). Fellow, Midwestern Psychological Association. Elected for substantial scientific contributions (2012). Fellow, American Psychological Association. Elected for substantial scientific contributions (2011) Division 6 (Behavioral Neuroscience and Comparative Psychology, 2011) Division 3 (Experimental Psychology, 2013) Division 1 (Society for General Psychology, 2014) Division 8 (Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2016) Fellow, Association for Psychological Science.
    [Show full text]
  • TRHG 9-5 Text-Final.X
    BOOK REVIEW No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality Judith Rich Harris (2006).W.W. Norton & Company, 322 pp, $US26.95, ISBN 0393059480. they cannot explain differences variety of research fields, develop- We are all social beings by nature. between genetically identical indi- mental, cognitive, social, and That is what united the human viduals (i.e., monozygotic twins). evolutionary psychology, neuro- species in our successful trip Similarly, gene–environment correla- physiology, primatology, and even through evolution. But it is also the tions concern the way different entomology. Step by step she clue to explain human individuality, genotypes drive people to different builds upon her ‘group socializa- states Judith R. Harris in her environments. Harris shows how a tion theory’ outlined in The second book, No Two Alike. After second critical look at apparently Nurture Assumption. She departs her first very successful book, The appealing research can reveal hidden from the idea that behavioral con- Nurture Assumption (1998), Harris methodological deficiencies that lead sistencies are driven by genes, in her second book sets out to dis- one to question the results. This is whereas the adaptive plasticity of entangle how two genetically the case with Suomi’s studies on behavior is driven by our ability to identical individuals who grow up cross-fostered monkeys, which discriminate across different envi- in the same family, can turn out dif- claimed to demonstrate that nurtur- ronments, and react differentially ferently. How is it possible that they ing mothers prevent their children to them. This, translated into are perceived by themselves and by from becoming aggressive.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Development
    Theories of Development Contents Note: Worth Publishers provides online Instructor and Student Tool Kits, DVD Student Tool Kits, and Instructor and Student video resources in PsychPortal for use with the text. See Part I: General Resources for information about these materials and the text Lecture Guides for a complete list by text chapter. What Theories Do Audiovisual Materials: Transitions Throughout the Life Span, Program 1: The Developing Person, p. 3 Teaching Tip: Differentiating Facts, Laws, Hypotheses, and Theories, p. 3 “On Your Own” Activities: D evelopmental Fact or Myth?, p. 3 (Handout 1, p. 19) The “Lifeline,” p. 3 (Handout 2, p. 20) Major Developmental Theories: Discover Your Bias, p. 4 (Handout 3, p. 21) Portfolio Assignment (see General Resources regarding the Portfolio Assignment for each unit) Grand Theories Classroom Activity: “Development” as a Social Construction, p. 4 Psychoanalytic Theory Audiovisual Materials: Young Dr. Freud , p. 5 Freud: The Hidden Nature of Man , p. 5 Sigmund Freud , p. 5 Erik Erikson: A Life’s Work , p. 5 “On Your Own” Activity: Freud’s Influence on Psychology and American Culture , p. 5 (Handout 4, p. 23) Behaviorism Audiovisual Materials: Learning , p. 5 Pavlov: The Condi tioned Reflex , p. 6 B. F. Skinner on Beha viorism , p. 7 B. F. Skinner and Behavior Change: Research, Practice, and Promise , p. 7 Childhood Aggression , p. 7 The Power of Positive Reinforcement , p. 7 Observational Learning, p. 8 Learning: Observational and Cognitive Approaches , p. 9 1 2 Theories of Development Classroom Activities: Freud and Watson, p. 6 Using a Token Economy to Bring Behaviorism to Life (and Increase Class Participation) , p.
    [Show full text]
  • CHILDREN DON't DO THINGS HALF WAY a Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999]
    Summer Reading from the Archive CHILDREN DON'T DO THINGS HALF WAY A Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999] I'm prone to making statements like this one: how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health. I guess you could call that an extreme statement. But I prefer to think of myself as a defender of the null hypothesis. Introduction It was in the 1990s that I received a phone call from Steven Pinker who wanted to make the world aware of the work of Judith Rich Harris, an unheralded psychologist who was advocating a revolutionary idea which she discussed in her 1999 Edge interview, "Children don't do things half way: children don’t compromise," in which she said, "how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health." 1 From the very early days of Edge, Harris was the gift that kept giving. Beginning in 1998, with her response to "What Questions Are You Asking Yourself?" through "The Last Question" in 2016, she exemplified the role of the Third Culture intellectual: "those scientists and other thinkers in the empirical world who, through their work and expository writing, are taking the place of the traditional intellectual in rendering visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefining who and what we are." Her subsequent Edge essays over the years focused on subjects as varied as natural selection, parenting styles, the effect of genes on human behavior, twin studies, the survival of friendship, beauty as truth, among others are evidence of a keen intellect and a fearless thinker determined to advance science-based thinking as well as her own controversial ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Make a Difference in Children's Character Development?
    DO PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN CHILDREN’S CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT? WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS Tom Lickona Center for the 4th and 5th Rs SUNY Cortland Fourth Annual Fall Character Education Seminar November 20, 1998 In its August 24, 1998 issue, Newsweek magazine devoted its cover story to a controversial new book, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do by Judith Rich Harris. Ms. Harris does not claim to be a psychologist or expert in child development; she is a textbook writer. Nevertheless, she puts forth a startling thesis: Parents do not have much effect on how kids turn out. How kids turn out, Harris says, is mostly the result of genes and peers. Of course, we all know that heredity and peers play a part in kids' development. But is it true, as Harris says, that parents have little influence? If it's true that parents have little influence on their children, that's very bad news for schools, for schools would logically have even less influence. I'd like to argue that Harris is wrong and common sense is right: Parents do matter. Studies of childrearing reveal many things effective parents do that make a major impact on their children and especially on their character development. We should know this body of evidence for at least two reasons. First, so we can counter Harris's claim and communicate to parents what the research really shows, thereby bolstering their confidence that they do make a difference. A second reason is that good schools are like good families.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Implications of Altruism Bias and Pathological Altruism
    Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism Barbara A. Oakley1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 9, 2013 (received for review February 14, 2013) The profound benefits of altruism in modern society are self-evident. Pathological altruism can be conceived as behavior in which However, the potential hurtful aspects of altruism have gone largely attempts to promote the welfare of another, or others, results unrecognized in scientific inquiry. This is despite the fact that instead in harm that an external observer would conclude was virtually all forms of altruism are associated with tradeoffs—some reasonably foreseeable. More precisely, this paper defines path- of enormous importance and sensitivity—and notwithstanding that ological altruism as an observable behavior or personal tendency examples of pathologies of altruism abound. Presented here are the in which the explicit or implicit subjective motivation is in- mechanistic bases and potential ramifications of pathological altru- tentionally to promote the welfare of another, but instead of ism, that is, altruism in which attempts to promote the welfare of overall beneficial outcomes the altruism instead has unreasonable others instead result in unanticipated harm. A basic conceptual ap- (from the relative perspective of an outside observer) negative proach toward the quantification of altruism bias is presented. consequences to the other or even to the self. This definition does Guardian systems and their over arching importance in the evolution not suggest that there are absolutes but instead suggests that, of cooperation are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology Times, Fall 2007
    FALL 2007 D E P A R T M E N T O F P SYCHO L OGY | UNIVERSITY O F Ill I N O I S A T U R B A N A - C H A MP A I G N FOCUS ON RESEA R CH The Legacy of Early Experience: Prospective and Psychological Retrospective Evidence for Enduring Effects Models of Language By Glenn I. Roisman Comprehension By Kara Federmeier One of the more Ironically, debates about the developmental controversial claims significance of early experience have, until Human brains are storehouses for vast in developmental recently, taken place in the relative absence amounts of information about things, psychology is that of much data from long-term, longitudinal people, places, and events. Remarkably, in early experiences studies, tracking cohorts of children from only hundreds of milliseconds the brain with caregivers leave infancy to maturity, that have used state- of an experienced language user can an enduring mark on of-the-art methods for studying the quality retrieve information from this storehouse in human development. of interpersonal relationships in the early response to a complex, often ambiguous, Although this is a very old idea, formalized in life course. Fortunately for me, it was as a perceptual signal—that is, a visual or theories that date back to the beginnings of graduate research assistant on one of the auditory word. Research conducted in the psychological science, no strong consensus few such investigations—Alan Sroufe, Byron University of Illinois Cognition and Brain has been built within the field or in society Egeland, and Andy at large about this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Succeed in Childhood
    How to Succeed in Childhood by Judith Rich Harris very day, tell your children bad for kids. In those days, spanking was that you love them. Hug considered not just the parents’ right but them at least once every 24 their duty. hours. Never hit them. If they Partly as a result of the major retoolings Edo something wrong, don’t say, “You’re in the advice industry, child-rearing styles bad!” Say, “What you did was bad.” No, have changed drastically over the course of wait—even that might be too harsh. Say, this century. Although abusive parents instead, “What you did made me unhap- have always existed, run-of-the-mill par- py.” ents—the large majority of the popula- The people who are in the business of tion—administer more hugs and fewer giving out this sort of advice are very angry spankings than they used to. at me, and with good reason. I’m the Now ask yourself this: Are children turn- author of The Nurture Assumption—the ing out better? Are they happier and better book that allegedly claims that “parents adjusted than they were in the earlier part don’t matter.” Though that’s not what the of the century? Less aggressive? Less anx- book actually says, the advice givers are ious? Nicer? nonetheless justified in their anger. I don’t pull punches, and I’m not impressed by ² their air of benevolent omniscience. Their advice is based not on scientific evidence It was Sigmund Freud who gave us the but on prevailing cultural myths.
    [Show full text]
  • TORT LIABILITY in the AGE of the HELICOPTER PARENT Elizabeth G. Porter∗ Discussions of Parental Liability by Courts and Legal
    3 PORTER 533 – 587 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2013 12:26 PM TORT LIABILITY IN THE AGE OF THE HELICOPTER PARENT Elizabeth G. Porter∗ ABSTRACT Discussions of parental liability by courts and legal scholars are often tinged with fear: fear that government interference will chill parental autonomy; fear that parents will be held liable for their children’s every misdeed; and, recently, fear that a new generation of so-called “helicopter parents” who hover over their children’s every move will establish unrealistically high legal standards for parenting. However, in the context of common law suits against parents, these fears are misguided. To the contrary, courts have consistently shielded wealthier parents—those most likely to be defendants in civil suits—from exposure to liability for conduct related to their parenting practices. This Article critically examines the common law of parental (non-) liability, both historically and in light of current cultural trends. Parental liability takes two forms: liability for parents’ harm to their children, and liability of parents for harms caused to others by their children. Individually these subjects have received remarkably little scholarly attention; together they have received none. Yet both types of parental liability are central to ongoing cultural debates about parenting, as well as to current controversies about the role of courts in establishing legal duty. A thorough reconsideration of parental liability is particularly timely in light of the new Restatement (Third) of Torts, which speaks directly to issues that are central to both forms of parental liability. This Article concludes that courts should hold parents to a standard of reasonable care.
    [Show full text]