Railroad Employee Fatalities Investigated by the Federal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Railroad Employee Fatalities Investigated by the Federal © Railroad Employee US. Department of Transportation Fatalities Investigated by Federal Railroad Administration the Federal Railroad Administration in 1980 Office of Safety DOT/FRA/ORRS February 1982 INTRODUCTION This report represents the Federal Railroad Administration's findings in the investigation of railroad employee fatalities during 1980. Not included are fatalities that occurred during train operation accidents; these are reported under another type of investigation. The purpose of this report is to direct public attention to the hazards inherent in day-to-day operations of railroads. It provides information in support of the overall Federal program to promote the safety of railroad employees. It also furthers the cause of safety by supplying all interested parties information which will help prevent recurrent accidents. Joseph W. Walsh Chairman Railroad Safety Board i CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE 1. Accidents related to maintenance- of-way inspections and operations a. Struck by train 54 128 55 131 58 137 64 148 b. Struck or run over by maintenance-of-way equipment 5 9 12 26 30 67 50 117 67 157 c. Contact with a high-voltage line near the track 25 54 d. Falling from bridge 62 144 e. Failure to use crane outriggers 35 81 f . Miscellaneous 15 33 2. Accidents related to inspection, servicing and maintenance of motive power, passenger, and freight equipment a. Servicing and maintenance of freight and passenger equipment 47 109 b. Defective box car appliances 39 90 c. Miscellaneous 24 52 29 65 3. Accidents related to switching and train operations a. Close clearance 28 63 41 95 63 146 l i CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE b. Crossing track in front of or going between trains and/or equipment 3 5 6 12 11 23 33 75 34 78 43 100 66 154 c. Falling off a moving train or switching equipment consist 32 73 49 114 71 166 d. Struck by moving train or equipment being switched 2 3 9 17 26 57 27 60 31 70 42 97 46 107 69 162 70 164 e. Switching movement hitting a derail 13 28 17 37 f. Miscellaneous 1 1 4 7 36 84 38 88 51 121 61 142 68 160 4. Automobile, highway, and truck accidents 19 41 44 103 52 124 56 133 5. Non-accidental death 7 15 8 16 48 112 59 139 iii CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE 6. Killed by assailant 57 136 7. Miscellaneous 10 20 14 31 16 35 18 39 20 43 21 45 22 48 23 50 37 87 40 93 45 105 53 ' 126 60 140 65 151 iv SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED INVOLVING ONE OR MORE FATALITIES RAILROAD ACCIDENTS AMTRAK 2 ATSF 4 BXN 1 BN 3 BO 7 CNW 2 CO 4 CR 3 CAGY 1 DRGW 1 DTI 1 ICG 3 ITC 1 LN 2 MILW 1 MP 3 NOPB 1 NWP 1 NW 6 PW 1 SCL 3 SLSF 2 SOO 4 SOU 4 SP 5 TN 1 UP 4 V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................... i CAUSE DIGEST ..................... .................. ii SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED INVOLVING ONE OR MORE FATALITIES................... v ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS ....................... 1 U 1. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Portage, Wisconsin January 1, 1980 ........................... 1 2. Southern Pacific Transportation Company San Francisco, California January 3, 1980 ........................... 3 3. Southern Railway Company Alexandria, Virginia January 12, 1980 .......................... 5 4. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Norfolk, Virginia January 18, 1980 .......................... 7 5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company Jonesboro, Arkansas January 18, 1980 ........................... 9 6. Columbus and Greenville Railway Company Columbus, Mississippi January 23, 1980 ........................... 12 7. Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company Hamler, Ohio January 22, 1980 ........................... 15 8. Burlington Northern Havre, Montana " January 22, 1980 .......................... 16 9. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Chesson, Alabama January 31, 1980 ....... 19 vi Page 10. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Brownwood, Texas February 7, 1980 .......................... 20 11. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Harmon, Virginia February 8 , 1980 ................ .......... 23 12. Union Pacific Railroad Green River, Wyoming February 11, 1980 ......................... 26 13. Southern Pacific Transportation Company Harlingen, Texas February 16, 1980 ................... 28 14. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company West Mosgrove, Pennsylvania February 20, 1980 ......................... 31 15. Southern Pacific Transportation Company Lobe Junction, Texas February 21, 1980 ......................... 33 16. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Decatur, Illinois February 21, 1980 ...................... ... 35 17. Union Pacific Railroad Meridian, Idaho March 14, 1980 ............................ 37 18. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Lubbock, Texas March 22, 1980 ......................... 39 19. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Stonefort, Illinois March 25, 1980 ............................ 41 20. Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company Lynn, Utah April 9 , 1980 ............................. 43 21. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company North Point, Pennsylvania May 14, 1980 .............................. 45 vii Page 22. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Paducah, Kentucky May 28, 1980 .............................. 48 23. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Jefferson Parish, Louisiana May 30, 1980 ..... •........................ 50 24. Texas § Northern Railway Company Lone Star, Texas June 2, 1980 .............................. 52 25. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Sedalia, Missouri June 6, 1980 ......................... 54 26. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Jackson, Tennessee June 8, 1980 .............................. 57 27. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Des Moines, Iowa June 10, 1980 ............................. 60 28. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Huntington, West Virginia June 10, 1980 ............................. 63 29. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Gainesville, Texas June 13, 1980 ......................... 65 30. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Sleepy Creek, West Virginia June 27, 1980 ............................. 67 31. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Richmond, Virginia July 7, 1980 .............................. 70 32. Soo Line Railroad Company Neenah, Wisconsin July 8, 1980 .............................. 73 33. Soo Line Railroad Company Glenwood, Minnesota July 9, 1980 .............................. 75 viii Page 34. Southern Railway Company Springfield, Virginia July 16, 1980 ............................. 78 35. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Licking, Kentucky July 23, 1980 ............................. 81 36. Burlington Northern Baden, Minnesota July 24, 1980 ...................... 84 37. Consolidated Rail Corporation Chicago, Illinois July 26, 1980 ..... 87 38. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company Norwich, Connecticut July 28, 1980 ............................. 88 39. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company Springfield, Missouri August 6, 1980 ............................ 90 40. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Washington, District of Columbia August 8, 1980 ..... 93 41. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Mulberry, Florida August 9, 1980 ................ 95 42. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Hot Springs, Arkansas August 15, 1980 ............................ 97 43. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Watson, Indiana August 18/, 1980 ........................... 100 44. Burlington Northern Medora, North Dakota August 26, 1980 ........................... 103 45. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Olive Hill, Kentucky August 29, 1980 ........................... 105 ix Page 46. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company St. Louis, Missouri September 5, 1980 ......................... 107 47. Southern Railway Company Spartanburg, South Carolina September 15, 1980 ......................... 109 w, 48. Soo Line Railroad Company Schiller Park, Illinois September 23, 1980 ......................... 112 * 49. Southern Pacific Transportation Company Houston, Texas October 2, 1980 ........................... 114 50. Soo Line Railroad Company Tesch, Michigan October 6, 1980 .................. 117 51. Bauxite and Northern Railway Company Bauxite, Arkansas October 15, 1980 .......................... 121 52. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Roymayor, Texas October 15, 1980 ............ 124 53. Illinois Terminal Railroad Company Granite City, Illinois October 17, 1980 .......................... 126 54. Union Pacific Railroad Company Egbert, Wyoming October 17, 1980 .......................... 128 55. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania October 21, 1980 ........... 131 56. Norfolk and Western Railway Company East St. Louis, Illinois » November 2, 1980 .......................... 133 57. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Sumner County, Tennessee November 6, 1980 .......................... 136 x Page 58. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Newark, New Jersey November 12, 1980 ......................... 137 59. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Decatur, Illinois November 13, 1980 ......................... 139 60. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Hamlet, North Carolina November 16, 1980 ......................... 140 61. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Samoa, California November 21, 1980 ......................... 142 62. Southern Railway Company Crawford, Florida November 24, 1980 ......................... 144 63. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Cleveland, Ohio December 2, 1980 .......................... 146 64. Consolidated Rail Corporation Briarcliff Manor, New York December 5, 1980 ......... 148 65. Southern Pacific Transportation Company San Antonio, Texas
Recommended publications
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Wabash Railroad
    HISTORY OF THE WABASH RAILROAD Local History at the St. Thomas Public Library 8 November 1838: The first railroad locomotive of the future Wabash Railroad is placed on track at Meredosia, Illinois. The railroad is called the Northern Cross and is operated for nearly 10 years by the state of Illinois. An early Northern Cross (later Wabash) locomotive. 1847: The original railroad is bought by Nicholas H. Ridgely for $21,000.00. The locomotives of the newly-named Sangamon & Morgan Railroad have fallen into disrepair and are replaced by oxen and horse-power for almost a year before new locomotives are purchased. 1853: The Lake Erie, Wabash, & St. Louis Railroad Company is formed to help connect Toledo, Ohio with the state of Illinois. This is the first use of the name Wabash, which is taken from the Wabash River flowing through Illinois and Indiana. 1865: A new corporation is formed under the name Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Company. It operates a direct, through line of railway starting at Toledo, Ohio, and terminating at Quincy, Illinois, and Keokuk, Iowa, a total of about 520 miles. The company thrives and expands to 678 miles of operating track. It is known as the “Wabash System.” 10 November 1879: Jay Gould, American railroad developer and speculator, attempts to use the Wabash roads to help create a transcontinental railroad. The Wabash Railway, the St. Louis, Kansas City, and Northern are merged into one continuous line linking Toledo with Kansas City. The Wabash, St. Louis, & Pacific Railroad Co. is incorporated and forms a central link in the Gould System.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Note for the Records
    VOL. 8, NO. 12 / VOL. 9 NO. 1 — DECEMBER 2015 / JANUARY 2016 OF NOTE Double PastPorts issue for the holidays This edition of PastPorts is a double issue covering Decem- ber and January. The next issue will appear in February 2016. Until then, we thank all of our loyal PastPorts readers and the many researchers who have visited the library over the past year. We wish you and yours a joyous holiday season and all the best for the New Year. Library holiday schedule Christmas Eve, Thursday, Dec. 24: closed Christmas Day, Friday, Dec. 25: closed New Year’s Eve, Thursday, Dec. 31: close at 5:00 p.m. New Year’s Day, Friday, Jan. 1: closed Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Monday, Jan. 18: closed FOR THE RECORDS A History of St. Louis Railroads, 1847–2015 Among the social forces of the modern world the railroad holds unquestionably the first place. There is not a single occupation or interest which it has not radically affected. Agriculture, manufacturers, commerce, city and country life, banking, finance, law, and even government itself, have all felt its influence.—Edward Howard, “A Railroad Study” in Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Sept. 1877 Figure 1 | Alton was considered the most promising river access point for railroads in the 1850s and led to the estab- All Eyes on the Mississippi lishment of the Chicago & Alton Railroad. The railroad has become the backbone of North America, the and upkeep of the network has sustained the United States primary means of transportation of goods and commodities, during the 20th and into the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota's Railroads
    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and
    [Show full text]
  • [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation And
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/30/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-16328, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control and Merger— Pan Am Systems, Inc., Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland Terminal Company, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Stony Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Decision No. 4 in STB Finance Docket No. 36472; Notice of Acceptance of Application and Related Filings; Issuance of Procedural Schedule. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for consideration the revised application filed on July 1, 2021, by CSX Corporation (CSXC), CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT), 747 Merger Sub 2, Inc. (747 Merger Sub 2), Pan Am Systems, Inc. (Systems), Pan Am Railways, Inc. (PAR), Boston and Maine Corporation (Boston & Maine), Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central), Northern Railroad (Northern), Portland Terminal Company (Portland Terminal), Springfield Terminal Railway Company (Springfield Terminal), Stony Brook Railroad Company (Stony Brook), and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company (V&M) (collectively, Applicants). The application will be referred to as the Revised Application. The Revised Application seeks Board approval under 49 U.S.C. 11321-26 for: CSXC, CSXT, and 747 Merger Sub 2 to control the seven railroads controlled by Systems and PAR, and CSXT to merge six of the seven railroads into CSXT. This proposal is referred to as the Merger Transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Railroad System Map-August 2019
    North Carolina !( Railroad System Clover !( !( South Boston Franklin Danville !( !( !( Mount Airy !( !( Clarksville Alleghany Eden !( Mayo Currituck Camden Ashe Hyco !( !( Gates !( Roanoke !( Conway Surry YVR Norlina Weldon R Stokes Rockingham Granville Rapids Elizabeth CA Caswell Person Vance !( Hertford City !( Roxboro Northampton !( Reidsville !( !( YVRR Oxford Henderson Warren Halifax !(Ahoskie VA Rural NC Watauga Wilkes !( Pasquotank Hall CA !( !( Erwin!( Yadkin Orange Kelford Chowan Perquimans North Durham Guilford !( N Franklin Avery Wilkesboro Forsyth !( Burlington Butner !( CDOT Mitchell ! Bertie !( Winston ! !(Hillsborough Franklinton Edenton Salem Greensboro Nash Caldwell ! Durham Rocky Midway !( High !( Wake Forest CLNA !(Taylorsville Iredell Davie ! Alamance !( ! Mount Yancey Lenoir Davidson Spring ! Madison !( Point Carrboro !( !( Tarboro Washington Alexander A Wake Burke C R Hope !( W C C T Zebulon Plymouth Tyrrell Y O !( Edgecombe !( Statesville !( D Cary CLNA Middlesex Lexington C !( !( !( Parmele Dare N ! W ! W Martin s Buncombe !( Hickory ! S !( S ain Chatham Raleigh Wendell t S n McDowell !( Morganton S !(Apex ! ou CMLX Marion !( k !Wilson M c rk Asheboro NHVX ky a Haywood !( !( o Pitt o P T Newton ! A l Salisbury n !( Wilson f m a O New Hll l !(Clayton N S n Old Fort Catawba !( L CLNA D t o m i CMIZ Denton u a t !( CLNA C C Greenville re a BLU Rowan Randolph u !( N Asheville G G N C !( W !( !( Belhaven Swain !( S !( Fuquay-Varina !( S !( Waynesville BLU A ! Washington !( GSM Lincoln Lincolnton ! T Selma Chocowinity
    [Show full text]
  • Cn-22 Kcs-5 1 Before the Surface Transportation
    CN-22 KCS-5 302575 BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ENTERED ___________________________ Office of Proceedings June 23, 2021 STB FINANCE DOCKET NO. 36514 Part of ___________________________ Public Record CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, GRAND TRUNK CORPORATION, AND CN’S RAIL OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES – CONTROL – KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, GATEWAY EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THE TEXAS MEXICAN RAILWAY COMPANY ___________________________ JOINT SUBMISSION OF UNION STATEMENTS SUPPORTING VOTING TRUST ___________________________ Applicants Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”) and Kansas City Southern (“KCS”) respectfully submit the enclosed three letters from rail unions representing CN employees that ask the Board to approve CN’s and KCS’ proposed voting trust. The three letters are from the General Chairmen of GO-377, GO-433, and GO-987 of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division (“SMART-TD”). All three general chairmen write that their local unions “unequivocally support[] approval of Canadian National’s voting trust.” In combination, GO-377, GO-433, and GO-987 represent over 1800 conductors on the CN system in the United States. GO-377 represents over 200 conductors on the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company; GO-433 represents over 800 conductors employed on the Illinois Central Railroad Company and the Chicago-Central & Pacific Railroad Company; and GO-987 1 CN-22 KCS-5 represents approximately 800 conductors on the Wisconsin Central Ltd. portion of CN’s system. Applicants note that the letter by General Chairman Flashberger of GO-987 was previously filed in this docket on June 16, 2021. Canadian Pacific then included the letter in its filing on Monday, June 21, and falsely claimed that it was a letter “express[ing] opposition to approval of Canadian National’s voting trust.”1 Despite Canadian Pacific’s misrepresentation, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Detailed Land Maps
    Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Detailed Land Maps This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit October 22, 2019 UALR Center for Arkansas History and Culture 401 President Clinton Avenue Little Rock, AR, 72201 [email protected] Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Detailed Land Maps Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Historical Note...............................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................4 Note................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Detailed Land Maps Summary Information Repository UALR Center for Arkansas History and Culture Title Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Detailed Land Maps Date 1917-1918 Extent 40.0 linear feet Language English Language of Materials Materials Entirely in English
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Train Control Update
    Positive Train Control Update CTB Rail Committee March 20, 2019 Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has nationwide regulatory and inspection responsibilities of all railroads. This includes PTC compliance for freights, Amtrak, and VRE in Virginia. FRA safety oversight focuses on compliance and enforcement in: Rail Safety Hazardous Material Regulatory Motive Power and Equipment Operating Practices Authority Signal and Train Control Track Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) has inspectors to supplement FRA inspectors and enforce federal safety regulations for Virginia’s railroads. VDOT manages federal fund for FHWA rail/roadway crossing Railroads maintain crossing infrastructure 2 PTC is mandated by Congress in order to prevent: Train‐to‐train collisions Derailments caused by excessive speed Unauthorized movement onto track where maintenance is occurring Movement of a train through a track switch left in the wrong Positive Train position Control (PTC) Required where passenger service and/or hazmat trains exist PTC equipment must be installed on locomotives and signals, and the two must integrate regardless of the Operator i.e. In Virginia, Amtrak/VRE locomotive equipment must be compatible with CSX/NS/NEC wayside equipment. Employees must be trained to operate, maintain, and repair the system. Federal deadline for implementation was extended from December 2015 to December 2018, with extension to 2020 to “turn it on.” 3 Railroad Total Hardware Installed Employees Trained (System‐wide, including beyond (On‐board & Wayside Hardware) Virginia) Virginia Railway Express 100% 100% Amtrak 100% 100% CSX 100% 100% Positive Train Norfolk Southern Railway 100% 100% VRE: Roll‐out; full PTC operations in 2019 anticipated. Control (PTC) Amtrak: All Virginia and Long Distance trains (except Auto Progress Train) under full PTC operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents 25131 Presidential Documents
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 97 / Friday, May 17, 1996 / Presidential Documents 25131 Presidential Documents Executive Order 13003 of May 15, 1996 Establishing an Emergency Board To Investigate Disputes Be- tween Certain Railroads Represented by the National Car- riers' Conference Committee of the National Railway Labor Conference and Their Employees Represented by the Brother- hood of Maintenance of Way Employes Disputes exist between certain railroads represented by the National Carriers' Conference Committee of the National Railway Labor Conference, including Consolidated Rail Corporation (including the Clearfield Cluster), Burlington Northern Railroad Co., CSX Transportation Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Union Pacific Railroad, Chicago & North Western Railway Co., Kansas City Southern Railway Co., and their employees represented by the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes. The railroads involved in these disputes are designated on the attached list, which is made a part of this order. The disputes have not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) (the ``Act''). In the judgment of the National Mediation Board, these disputes threaten substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree that would deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service. NOW, THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 10 of the Act (45 U.S.C. 160), it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Establishment of Emergency Board (``Board''). There is established effective May 15, 1996, a Board of three members to be appointed by the President to investigate any and all of the disputes raised in mediation.
    [Show full text]