DOCSLIB.ORG

Chemical (Quality Or Surface Water in the Allegheny River Basin Pennsylvania and New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chemical (Quality Or Surface Water in the Allegheny River Basin Pennsylvania and New York GEOLOGICAL i>i , . , ,. f ? RESOURCES DiVl Chemical (Quality or Surface Water in the Allegheny River Basin Pennsylvania and New York GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1835 Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters Chemical Quality of Surface Water in the Allegheny River Basin Pennsylvania and New York By E. F. McCARREN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1835 Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Forests an^d Waters UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 66-326 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract. -___-__--------_-______-_________________________________ 1 Introduction.-__-_-_-__--_--____.__._____._____________.____._____ 2 Purpose and Scope_____________________________________________ 3 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 3 Allegheny River basin_____.________ _______________.______________ 3 Location.____________________________________________________ 3 Historical background__-____-__________________________________ 4 Topography. ___--_----__-_-_-___-______-_________-___________ 5 Climate._____________________________________________________ 5 Geology._____________________________________________________ 6 Economic significance of the Allegheny River drainage basin and adjacent areas__--__-___-_-__----____________-___-_________ 7 Acid-mine-drainage problems_.________________________________ 8 Reservoirs.___________________________________________________ 12 Chemical quality of streams._______________________________________ 15 Allegheny River at Red House, N.Y_____________________________ 17 Conewango Creek.____________________________________________ 20 Allegheny River near Kinzua.__________________________________ 21 Allegheny River at Warren and a prognosis of reservoir influence.... 22 Brokenstraw Creek____________________________________________ 33 Allegheny River at West Hickory______________________________ 33 Tionesta Creek_..._..._..._______________._____.._.._... 33 Oil Creek_________.--...-_.____.__-_______....._..._.._._____- 34 French Creek___________.______.---__.._______._______-____._. 35 Allegheny River at Franklin.___________________________________ 39 Clarion River.________________________________________________ 40 Redbank Creek.______________________________________________ 47 Mahoning Creek._____________________________________________ 47 Allegheny River at Kittanning__________________________________ 48 Crooked Creek.__________________________________________ 53 Kiskiminetas River____________________________________________ 53 Allegheny River at Natrona.___________________________________ 60 Allegheny River at Sharpsburg and Nadine__________-----_-______ 61 Summary_ ---_____-_______________________________------_-_-_-__ 66 Selected references.._______._____________________--__-__--_--_---__ 69 Index.___________________________________________________________ 71 IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map of the Allegheny River basin showing geohydrology, ground-water potential, and location of sampling sites, Pennsylvania and New York.___________________ In pocket FIGURE 1-2. Maps showing 1. Cumulative coal production in the conterminous United States to January 1, 1959_____________ 9 2. Tributaries to the Allegheny River affected by coal-mine wastes.-__________________________ 11 3-4. Graphs showing 3. Probable effects on water quality by releases of water from the Allegheny Reservoir._______._- 15 4. Specific conductance and water hardness of the Allegheny River and tributaries during drought of 1963 __ _-_- -- -- -- 16 5. Map showing predominant water constituents at selected locations during low flow, Allegheny River, November I960. .. --_ _- ._ --_ 18 6-18. Graphs showing 6. Composition of the Allegheny River at low flow, early November I960.________-___-______.- 19 7.- Cumulative frequency curve of specific conduct­ ance, Conewango Creek at Russell, Pa., October 1951 to September 1952._________-___-..--__ 21 8. Daily chloride concentration of the Allegheny River at Red House, N.Y., and Warren, Pa., October 1953 to September 1952.____._..____. 24" 9. Discharge and dissolved solids, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., October 1948 to September 1949.. 25 10. Daily mean discharge versus daily specific conduct­ ance, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., October 1948 to September 1949..._..____._.._......_ 26 11. Cumulative frequency curve of specific conductance Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., 1948-51 ______ 30 12. Percentage composition of dissolved solids at average, high, and low flows, Clarion River near Piney, Pa., October 1946 to September 1947.... 41 13. Relationship between dissolved solid and specific conductance, Allegheny River at Kittanning, Pa., 1960-62____________,__________________ 50 14. Cumulative frequency curve of water temperature, Allegheny River at Kittanning, Pa., 1961-62___ 52 15. Cumulative frequency curve of discharge, Kis- kiminetas River at Vandergrift, Pa., 1938-60. __ 54 16. Cumulative frequency curve of specific con ductance, Kiskiminetas River at Leechburg, Pa., October 1961 to September 1962______________________ 57 17. Flow duration curves, Allegheny River at Natrona, Pa., 1928-55 with natural flow and with Alle­ gheny Reservoir in operation.________________ 60 18. Cumulative frequency curve of dissolved solids, Allegheny River at Nadine, Pa., 1951-61. _____ 64 CONTENTS V TABLES Page TABLE 1. Existing reservoirs and flood-control features on Allegheny Eiver above Pittsburgh._-______-_-______-____---______ 14 2. Frequency of concentration levels for dissolved chemical constituents, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., for the period October 1948 to September 1951-___-_-_____________ 23 3. Chemical analyses and recorded extremes, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., water year October 1961 to September 1962-_ 27 4. Chemical analyses, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., for the period October 1962 to March 1965______.______________ 28 5. Temperature of water, Allegheny River at Warren, Pa., water year October 1961 to September 1962______________ 31 6. Chemical analyses and recorded extremes, French Creek at Franklin, Pa., water year October 1946 to September 1947 37 7. Specific conductance, French Creek at Franklin, Pa., water year October 1946 to September 1947______--_-_----__-_- 39 8. Chemical analyses, Clarion River near Piney, Pa., water year October 1946 to September 1947_____._____.._______ 42 9. Frequency of concentration levels for chemical constituents, Clarion River at Piney, Pa., for the period October 1946 to September 1952___________.____.________-____-______-_ 44 10. Chemical analyses and recorded extremes, Clarion River near Piney, Pa., for the period October 1952 to June 1953-__.__ 45 11. Chemical analyses and recorded extremes, Allegheny River at Kittanning, Pa., water year October 1961 to September 1962__ 49 12. Temperature of water, Allegheny River at Kittanning, Pa., water year October 1959 to September I960._____________ 51 13. Temperature of water, Allegheny River at Kittanning, Pa., water year October 1960 to September 1961-------------- 52 14. Chemical analyses and recorded extremes, Kiskiminetas River at Leechburg (Vandergrift), Pa., water year October 1961 to September 1962-----___--____--____-_.-_--_-_---_--- 56 15. Temperature of water, Kiskiminetas River at Leechburg, Pa., water year October 1961 to September 1962..-________-__ 58 16. Sulfuric-acid discharge, Kiskiminetas River at Vandergrift, Pa., water year October 1960 to September 1961 __-__.-_--_-_- 59 17. Analyses of radioactivity in Pennsylvania streams, 1958-59-.- 59 18. Chemical analyses and descriptive information, Allegheny River at Sharpsburg, Pa., water year October 1951 to September 1952__.____________________________________ 62 19. Monthly average concentration of nitrate and dissolved oxygen, Allegheny River at Nadine, Pa., water years 1952-61__.--- 65 CHEMICAL QUALITY OF SURFACE WATER IN THE ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK By E. F. ABSTRACT The Allegheny River is the principal source of water to many industries and to communities in the upper Ohio River Valley. The river and its many tribu­ taries pass through 19 counties in northwestern and western Pennsylvania. The population in these counties exceeds 3 million. A major user of the Al­ legheny River is the city of Pittsburgh, which has a population greater than 600,000. The Allegheny River is as basic to the economy of the upper Ohio River Valley in western Pennsylvania as are the rich deposits of bituminous coal, gas, and oil that underlie the drainage basin. During the past 5 years many streams that flow into the Allegheny have been low flowing because of droughts affecting much of the eastern United States. Consequently, the concentration of solutes in some streams has been unusually high because of wastes from coal mines and oil wells. These and other water-quality problems in the Allegheny River drain­ age basin are affecting the economic future of some areas in western Pennsylvania. Because of environmental factors such as climate, geology, and land and water uses, surface-water quality varies considerably throughout the river basin. The natural quality of headwater streams, for example, is affected by salt­ water wastes from petroleoum production.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Open Space Plan (PDF)
    February 2010 BRC-TAG-12-5-23 The contributions of the following agencies, groups, and individuals were vital to the successful development of this Comprehensive Recreation, Parks, and Open Space Plan. They are commended for their interest in the project and for the input they provided throughout the planning process. Venango County Commissioners Timothy S. Brooks, Chair Troy A. Wood, Vice-Chair Janet D. Beichner Venango County Regional Planning Commission Judith Downs, Executive Director Project Study Committee Marilyn Black, Oil Region Alliance, Heritage Development, Vice President Judy Downs, Venango County Regional Planning Commission, Executive Director Jacob Weiland, Oil Creek State Park, Park Manager Deb Frawley, Council on Greenways and Trails Mike Henderson, Oil Region Alliance, Project Manager Jim Holden, Allegheny Valley Trails Association, President Debb Kapp, Venango County Regional Planning Commission Steve Kosak, Charitable Trust, Consultant Lori Sloss, UMPC – Employee Health Cecile Stelter, DCNR – Dept. of Forestry, District Forester David Strickland, Two Mile Run Park Advisory Board Richard Mahalic, Two Mile Run Park Director This project was fi nanced, in part, by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Additional funding was provided by: • Oil Region Alliance of Business, Industry, and Tourism • Edith C. Justus
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology and Early History of the Allegheny River. Verylittlehas
    Archaeology and Early History of Allegheny River 21 The Archaeology and Early History of the Allegheny River. Very littlehas been written concerning the archaeology of the region along the Allegheny River. One reason for this lack of material relating to this most historic field of investigation is because there has never been any real scien- tific work done init,and very little has been done to collect and to study the archaeological material which has been found in it. Itis very strange that :&uch should be the case, as this river valley has seen more changes in the early aboriginal occupation than any other valley in the state. The author, in a recent number of Pittsburgh First gave a sketch of the various Indian peoples who have lived along the course of this stream. Among these are the Akan- sea, the Cherokee, the Erie, the Black Minquas and the historic Seneca, Delaware and Shawnee. — There would, therefore be mingled the cultures of the Siouian, the Iro- quoian and the Algonkian groups. There is some reason for thinking that the earliest oc- cupation of this region, like the greater part of Pennsyl- vania and New York, was Algonkian. The very oldest types of cultural remains and the most badly weathered which the author has seen, belong to this prehistoric Algonkian culture. Next comes the Iroquoian, including the Cherokee, Erie and Seneca. The last cultural remains are those of the historic period, when the Seneca, the Delaware and Shaw- nee came into this region. The State Museum has recently purchased, through the Historical Commission, a most unique collection of In- dian artifacts which were collected by L.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Plan Phase 1
    Westmoreland County Department of Planning and Development Greensburg, Pennsylvania Act 167 Scope of Study for Westmoreland County Stormwater Management Plan June 2010 © PHASE 1 – SCOPE OF STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 Purpose6 ................................................................................................................... 3 Stormwater7 Runoff Problems and Solutions ........................................................ 3 Pennsylvania8 Storm Water Management Act (Act 167) ................................... 4 9 Act 167 Planning for Westmoreland County ...................................................... 5 Plan1 Benefits ........................................................................................................... 6 Stormwater1 Management Planning Approach ................................................. 7 Previous1 County Stormwater Management Planning and Related Planning Efforts ................................................................................................................................. 8 II. GENERAL COUNTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 9 Political1 Jurisdictions .............................................................................................. 9 NPDES1 Phase 2 Involvement ................................................................................. 9 General1 Development Patterns ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Open Space Plan Appendix (PDF)
    February 2010 VENANGO COUNTY - PUBLIC RECREATIONAL RESOURCES BY PLANNING UNIT g PLANNING UNIT MUNICIPALITY FACILITY Picnic Pavilion Concession Stand Baseball Field Softball Field Box Press Batting Cage Tennis Court Basketball Court Miniature Golf Court Bocce Horse Shoe Court Playground Racquetball Court Skate Park Hockey Dek Trail Pond/Lake/River Center Nature/History Community Center Court Volleyball Volleyball Court-Sand Football Field Track Gazebo Maintenance Building Camping grounds Boat/Canoe Launch Ice Arena Pool Amphitheater Bandstand Field Soccer Neighborhood Park Acrea Community Park Acreage Other acreage Allegheny NORTHERN Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Canal Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Cherrytree Township Cherrytree Pavilion Park 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 Cooperstown Cooperstown Aluminum Borough Park 3 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.01 Cornplanter Township Pithole Historic Park 10000000000000010100000000000000 95 Jackson Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Oakland Township Two Mile Run County Park 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2,595 Oil Creek Township Drake Well Museum 10000000001000011100000010000000 173 Oil Creek Township Oil Creek State Park 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,294.70 Pine Grove Township Harvest Home Park 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.84 Pleasantville Borough Merrick Street Complex 01200100000100000000000010000000
    [Show full text]
  • Armstrong County Survey
    ARMSTRONG COUNTY IRON AND STEEL SURVEY Final draft Eliza Smith Brown with Carmen P. DiCiccio, Ph.D. Prepared for Steel Industry Heritage Corporation by Brown, Carlisle & Associates October 1997 Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 2 Historic Context . 4 Iron . 5 Steel . 8 Coal and Coke . 9 Clay and Refractories . 12 Glass . 14 Lumber . 15 Oil and Gas . 15 Limestone . 17 Water Transportation . 17 Rail Transportation . 20 Associated Properties Typology . 23 Criteria for Selection . 25 Site List . 26 National Register Eligibility . 51 Recommendations Endangered Site and Action List . 53 Designations . 53 Interpretation . 54 Bibliography . 55 Introduction This report is a component of the Rivers of Steel program, which is an outgrowth of the Steel Industry Heritage Concept Plan published in 1993. Rivers of Steel is a heritage tourism initiative that seeks to preserve and celebrate the story of Big Steel and its related industries in southwestern Pennsylvania. More specifically, it weaves together cultural, recreational, and historical resources in a unifying physical framework with an exciting programmatic theme that will bolster the regional economy through tourism and economic development. The Rivers of Steel region, originally encompassing the six counties of Allegheny, Beaver, Fayette, Greene, Washington, and Westmoreland, was named a Heritage Area by the Pennsylvania Heritage Parks Program in April 1996. Late in 1996, Armstrong County was added to the Heritage Area, prompting the need for both historic and ethnographic surveys. Consequently, the Steel Industry Heritage Corporation (SIHC) commissioned this study, funded by the Pennsylvania Heritage Parks Program, with matching funds from five local financial institutions: Farmers National Bank, Mellon Bank, Merchants National Bank, Pennwood Savings Bank, and National City Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allegheny River Corridor Provide Intermodal Opportunities Along the Corridor
    CORRIDOR 21 The Allegheny River Corridor This corridor connects Pittsburgh and its eastern suburbs to I-80, north-central Pennsylvania and the markets of the northeastern United States and Canada. The corridor includes Pittsburgh, Kittanning, and Brookville. OBJECTIVES: • Provide better access to the Port of Pittsburgh. • Provide intermodal opportunities along the corridor. 66 Brookville Clarion 28 Major Corridor Facilities Butler Jefferson 28 PA Highway 66 Railroad Kittanning Airport Armstrong Mass Transit 28 Port Pittsburgh 66 Other Facilities Allegheny Other Connecting Highway Westmoreland Railroad 87 PennPlan MOVES CORRIDOR 22 The Rivers of Steel Corridor This north-south corridor connects West Virginia to Pittsburgh, Sharon, and Erie, and is western Pennsylvania’s most significant transportation corridor. The corridor includes the City of Pittsburgh and its airport and port; the Beaver Valley; New Castle; and the Sharon-Farrell-Hermitage urban area. OBJECTIVES: • Provide better access to the Port of Erie and the Port of Pittsburgh. • Construct the Mon-Fayette Expressway from Pittsburgh to I-68 in West Virginia. • Provide intermodal opportunities along the corridor. • Enhance safety and reduce congestion along PA 18 in the Sharon area. • Implement intelligent transportation systems along the corridor. 88 Statewide Corridors CORRIDOR 22 The Rivers of Steel Corridor New York Erie Erie 18 79 8 Crawford Major Corridor Facilities 322 Interstate Highway 18 Mercer US Highway Sharon Venango PA Highway Ohio 79 Butler Railroad Lawrence Airport 8 Mass Transit 60 Ports Beaver Allegheny 279 30 Other Facilities 18 Pittsburgh Other Connecting Highway Washington Railroad 79 18 Greene Fayette West Virginia Maryland 89 PennPlan MOVES CORRIDOR 23 The Gateway Corridor This corridor connects southwestern Pennsylvania to northern Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and the rest of the midwestern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts Appendix 1.4C-Amphibians Amphibian Species of Greatest Conservation Need Maps: Physiographic Provinces and HUC Watersheds Species Accounts (Click species name below or bookmark to navigate to species account) AMPHIBIANS Eastern Hellbender Northern Ravine Salamander Mountain Chorus Frog Mudpuppy Eastern Mud Salamander Upland Chorus Frog Jefferson Salamander Eastern Spadefoot New Jersey Chorus Frog Blue-spotted Salamander Fowler’s Toad Western Chorus Frog Marbled Salamander Northern Cricket Frog Northern Leopard Frog Green Salamander Cope’s Gray Treefrog Southern Leopard Frog The following Physiographic Province and HUC Watershed maps are presented here for reference with conservation actions identified in the species accounts. Species account authors identified appropriate Physiographic Provinces or HUC Watershed (Level 4, 6, 8, 10, or statewide) for specific conservation actions to address identified threats. HUC watersheds used in this document were developed from the Watershed Boundary Dataset, a joint project of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Physiographic Provinces Central Lowlands Appalachian Plateaus New England Ridge and Valley Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain Appalachian Plateaus Central Lowlands Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain New England Ridge and Valley 675| Appendix 1.4 Amphibians Lake Erie Pennsylvania HUC4 and HUC6 Watersheds Eastern Lake Erie
    [Show full text]
  • Roads Analysis Report (FWRAP) (USDA-FS 2003A)
    Allegheny National Forest Marienville Ranger District North End Roads Analysis Project Report March 2006 Version 1.0 - The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political affiliation, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication or program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write the USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington, DC, 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice or TDD). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. STANDARD PRODUCT DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. This document is available in large print. Contact the Supervisor’s Officer 1-814-723-5150 Printed/photocopied on Recycled Paper EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roads Analysis Background The North End Roads Analysis Project (NERAP) Inter-Disciplinary (ID) team, in conjunction with line officers and the public, used a six step process to identify important road related issues, discuss direct and indirect road related impacts, and make recommendations on the desired future characteristics of the road system. Roads analysis is not a decision process nor does it constitute a major federal action.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    ALLEGHENY WINs “WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT NEEDS” COALITION ANNUAL REPORT 2009 MISSION To promote protection, restoration, and habitat improvement activities in watersheds that lie entirely or partially in the Allegheny National Forest to achieve Forest Service and community needs through collaboration and partnerships. Cover Photo - Spring Creek in Forest County, PA showing stream bank stabilization work upstream of the bridge on Forest Road 130 Allegheny WINs 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Page Allegheny WINs in 2009 2 Where is Allegheny WINs? 3 Clarion River Watershed Projects Spring Creek Watershed Restoration Project 6 Big Mill Creek Acid Remediation Project 7 Upper and Middle Allegheny River Watershed Projects Browns Run Watershed Assessment 12 Morrison Run Restoration 13 South Branch of Kinzua Creek Acid Remediation 15 Big Bend Bird Viewing Platform 17 Willow Creek Wetland Restoration and Fish Habitat Improvement 18 Allegheny River Cleanup, First Annual 18 Allegheny Reservoir Cleanup, Fifth Annual 20 Tionesta Creek Watershed Projects West Branch Tionesta Creek, North Country Connector Project 23 West Branch Tionesta Creek, Earth Day Project 24 Ross Run Habitat Improvement Project 25 Education and Outreach Trout in the Classroom 27 Rain Barrel Workshop 29 Trout and Clean Streams Expo 30 Project Funding 31 Volunteer Contributions by Project 33 Allegheny WINs Partners 34 1 Allegheny WINs 2009 Annual Report Allegheny WINs in 2009 The Allegheny Watershed Improvement Needs Coalition (WINs) was formed in April 2007 with its mission “to promote protection, restoration, and habitat improvement activities in watersheds that lie entirely or partially in the Allegheny National Forest to achieve Forest Service and community needs through collaboration and partnerships.” The group’s main focus is on developing and implementing projects to protect and improve high quality watersheds and aquatic ecosystems and to restore impaired watersheds and aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio River Basin Facts
    Ohio River Basin Facts Drainage Area: Total: 203,940 square miles in 15 states (528,360 square kilometers) In Pennsylvania: 15,614 square miles (40,440 square kilometers) Length of River: Ohio River: 981 miles Allegheny River: 325 miles Monongahela River: 129 miles Watershed Address from Headwaters to Mouth: The Ohio begins at the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and ends in Cairo, Illinois, where it flows into the Mississippi River. The Allegheny begins in north-central Pennsylvania near Coudersport and Colesburg in Potter County, flows north into New York, then bends to the south and flows to Pittsburgh. The Monongahela begins just above Fairmont, West Virginia, at the confluence of the West Fork and Tygart Valley rivers, and flows northward to Pittsburgh. Major Tributaries in Pennsylvania: Allegheny, Beaver, Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Clarion, and Conemaugh Rivers; French Creek Population: Total: 25 million people In Pennsylvania: 3,451,633 people Major Cities in Pennsylvania: (over 10,000 people) Aliquippa, Butler, Greensburg, Indiana, Johnstown, Meadville, New Castle, Oil City, Pittsburgh, Sharon, Somerset, St. Mary’s, Uniontown, Warren, Washington Who Is Responsible for the Overall Management of the Water Basin? Ohio River Basin Commission Ohio Valley Water Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) Ohio River Basin Water Management Council Ohio River Basin Consortium for Research and Education Economic Importance and Uses: An estimated $43 billion in commodities are transported along the 2,582 miles of navigable waterways within the basin annually. Barge transportation has increased 50% over the last decade and carries 35% of the nation’s waterborne commerce. Approximately 121 companies are located directly on the waterfront and are dependent upon southwestern Pennsylvania’s rivers for their business in one way or another.
    [Show full text]