Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations Public Consultation 2012 – Site Assessment Forms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations Public Consultation 2012 – Site Assessment Forms Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations Public Consultation 2012 – Site Assessment Forms www.maidstone.gov.uk/ldf Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms CONTENTS page Strategic housing location to the north west of the urban area HO-03-NW Land at Hermitage Lane 2 HO-07-NW Land at Oakapple Lane 5 HO-08-NW Land at Allington Way 10 HO-10-NW/ Land East of Hermitage Lane (two sites within one area) 15 HO-13-NW HO-11-NW West of Hermitage Lane 21 HO-16-NW Bell Farm, North Street 26 HO-19-NW Bridge Nursery, London Road 31 HO-20-NW Bunyards Farm, London Road 36 HO-21-NW Land at Gatland Lane 41 Strategic housing location to the south east of the urban area HO-01-SE Land at Bicknor farm 46 HO-02-SE Land South Otham lane 54 HO-04-SE Land South Sutton Road 57 HO-05-SE Gore Court, Church Road 64 HO-06-SE Land north of Horseshoes Lane, Langley Heath 71 HO-09-SE North of Sutton Road 74 HO-12-SE Maidstone Urban Extension Area C 83 HO-14-SE Land at Gore Court 87 HO-15-SE Langley Park Farm 100 HO-17-SE Land at Gore Court Road 111 HO-18-SE Rumwood Nursery (East) 116 Strategic employment location at junction 8 of the M20 motorway EMP-01-J8 Land to east of A20/M20 junction 119 EMP-02-J8 Land to south of A20/M20 junction 133 EMP-03-J8 Land to west of A20/M20 junction 153 Strategic employment location at junction 7 of the M20 motorway EMP-04-J7 Land at Newnham Park, Bearsted Road 171 Map of Sites 181 1 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms 1. SITE INFORMATION Number HO-03-NW. Strategic location North West Site name/address Land at Hermitage Lane, Maidstone Landowner Melvyn Wallace Duggan Agent N/A Proposed use Housing Greenfield/PDL Greenfield Site area (ha) 1.9 hectares (Approx 1.0 hectares within the MBC boundary and 0.9 hectares within the TMBC boundary) Site origin SHLAA 2009, call for sites. DISCOUNTING (HOUSING SITES) Adjacent to Maidstone Yes urban area Adjacent to built up No area Could be adjacent if No other sites allocated as well DISCOUNT Y/N YES. Due to the site’s separation from the built form of the urban area and its woodland character the development of this site would harm the character of the area as evidenced by the protected nature of the trees on the site. In addition the designation of the site as ancient woodland would result in irreparable harm to ecology and the woodland if development occurred. Therefore this is not an appropriate housing site. 2. SITE ASSESSMENT Site description Current use Adjacent uses Planning and other designations Planning history Landscape/LCA (inc. long distance views) Topography 2 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms Ecology Trees (inc. TPO) Agricultural quality Heritage (LB/CA/SAM) Archaeology PROW Transport/site access Air quality/noise Land contamination Flood zone Utilities Access to services Assessment conclusion 3. AVAILABILITY ISSUES Multiple ownership Ransom strip Existing use agreements Owner agreement Developer agreement DISCOUNT Y/N 4a. ACHIEVABILITY ISSUES Market Land values vs. alternative uses Cost (including infrastructure/planning obligations) Site preparation Availability of funding Infrastructure/planning obligations (on/off site) Affordable housing % + number CSH/BREEAM level Public realm Southern Water South East Water Transport (on/off site) Primary education Secondary education Library Community facility Youth 3 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms Indoor sport Kent Adult Social Services Green and blue infrastructure Other strategic infrastructure VIABILITY FEEDBACK 4b. DELIVERY Developers’ phasing Build out rates Number of developers Size and capacity of developer/s Phasing 2012 – 2016 2016 – 2021 2021 – 2026 Beyond plan period TOTAL YIELD CROSS SITE COMPARISON 5. POST ASSESSMENT REVIEW 6. CONCLUSIONS Due to the site’s separation from the built form of the urban area and its woodland character the development of this site would harm the character of the area as evidenced by the protected nature of the trees on the site. In addition the designation of the site as ancient woodland would result in irreparable harm to ecology and the woodland if development occurred. Therefore this is not an appropriate housing site. 4 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms 1. SITE INFORMATION Number HO-07-NW Strategic location North West Site name/address Land at Oakapple Lane, Maidstone (Barming & Heath Ward) Landowner Mrs V. Foster Crouch And Mr And Mrs B. Sunnucks Agent DHA Planning Proposed use Housing Greenfield/PDL Greenfield Site area (ha) 2.7 Site origin 2009 SHLAA DISCOUNTING (HOUSING SITES) Adjacent to Maidstone Yes urban area Adjacent to built up Yes area Could be adjacent if Yes other sites allocated as well DISCOUNT Y/N NO 2. SITE ASSESSMENT Site description The land is laid out in small parcels with hedgerows along the east and west sides with additional hedgerows running across the site east to west (just north of the middle). Public footpath KM12 runs down the western side (in the northern part) before crossing diagonally across the site to the south east corner public footpath KM11 runs along the southern boundary of the site. To the east of the site is Oakwood Hospital cemetery with residential development (in Broomshaw Road) to the south. To the north of the site is an agricultural field (land west of Hermitage Lane site). To the west are open fields. The site is accessed from an unmade track leading to Oakapple Lane to the east. Current use Equestrian Adjacent uses South – residential. West – open land/agricultural. North – agricultural. East – Oakwood Hospital cemetery and then residential beyond. 5 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms Planning and other ENV31 – Strategic Gap. designations Planning history 78/1807 - Portable stables – APPROVED. Landscape/LCA (inc. Quite a contained site with views limited by its lack of long distance views) road frontage. Substantial hedgerows bound the site and cross it and some of these would be lost if development occurred. To the south is significant residential development. Topopgraphy The site is generally flat hence its suitability for equestrian use. Ecology The site itself holds little ecological interest due to the equestrian use on the land. However, the woodland to the north of the site is ancient woodland and as such any development would need to include a 30 metres buffer to this land. Trees (inc. TPO) No TPOs on site and although there are some trees interspersed within the hedgerows there are no specific specimens that would be worthy of a TPO. Agricultural quality 2.5 ha horse grazing paddocks. Grade 2. Heritage (LB/CA/SAM) None recorded. Archaeology Extensive prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains to immediate north. Development with archaeological measures should be possible on this site. PROW Public footpath KM12 runs down the western side (in the northern part) before crossing diagonally across the site to the south east corner public footpath KM11 runs along the southern boundary of the site. Transport/site access There is an unmade track leading to Oakapple Lane and a point of the site meets Broomshaw Road. However, vehicular access to this site should occur through Land West of Hermitage Lane if chosen. Air quality/noise Comments apply as per West of Hermitage Lane proposal. This site is situated close to Hermitage Lane and opposite Maidstone Hospital. Traffic noise would be an issue, as would noise and, in particular, vibration from nearby Gallagher’s Quarry to the West. We have received many complaints over the past few years from householders concerned about the regular blasting carried out and the effect this may have on their properties. Associated with this 6 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms quarrying we have had periodic complaints concerning dust. Recommendations Traffic noise, air quality, industrial noise and vibration and dust nuisance conditions would be required. Land contamination See above. Flood zone Zone 1 Utilities No additional requirement other than the normal costs of development on a greenfield site Access to services Parade of shops on Hermitage Lane including Tesco express. Local primary schools at Westborough, St Simon Stock, Bower Grove, Barming within 1 mile. Secondary school at Oakwood Park within 1 mile. Two doctors surgeries within 0.5 miles. Three dental surgeries within 1 mile. Barming Post Office less than a mile away. Assessment conclusion For – relative lack of ecological, landscape, archaeological/heritage constraints. Access to site relatively easy to achieve. Existing local services. Against – proximity to quarry. Mitigation – Noise attenuation measures in relation to nearby quarry. Quarry is also controlled by conditions on its operating hours. 3. AVAILABILITY ISSUES Multiple ownership No Ransom strip No – Although access is likely to rely on adjacent site. Existing use agreements None Owner agreement Yes Developer agreement Yes DISCOUNT Y/N NO 4a. ACHIEVABILITY ISSUES Market Land values vs. Unknown alternative uses Cost (including infrastructure/planning obligations) Site preparation Not substantial Availability of funding Unknown 7 Maidstone Borough Council Core Strategy Strategic Site Allocations August 2012 Officers’ Site Assessment Forms Infrastructure/planning obligations (on/off site) Affordable housing % + 40% number CSH/BREEAM level 4 Public realm None Southern Water None South East Water None Transport (on/off site) Off site contributions to:- M20 junction 5 and Coldharbour roundabout. A20 London Road with St Laurence Avenue (20/20 roundabout).
Recommended publications
  • 2018-19 Authority Monitoring Report
    Date: 2018-2019 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 2. Maidstone Profile ......................................................................................................... 5 3. Development Plan Progress ...................................................................................... 6 Local Development Scheme: Local Plan Review ......................................................... 6 Neighbourhood Plans ......................................................................................................... 7 Community Infrastructure Levy ...................................................................................... 8 Duty to Cooperate .............................................................................................................. 8 Supplementary Planning Documents ............................................................................. 8 4. Local Plan Performance: Maidstone Borough Local Plan – Monitoring Indicators ............................................................................................................................... 10 General/Whole Plan ......................................................................................................... 10 Housing ............................................................................................................................... 11 Employment ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • River Medway Catchment Management Plan Final Report
    NRA Southern 16 RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region J«iy 1993 MISSION STATEMENT The NRA’s mission is : "We will protect and improve the water environment by the effective management of water resources and by substantial reductions in pollution. We will aim to provide effective defence for people and property against flooding from rivers and the sea. In discharging our duties we will operate openly and balance the interests of all who benefit from and use rivers, groundwaters, estuaries, and coastal waters. We will be businesslike, efficient and caring towards our employees". NRA Copyright waiver This document is intended to be used widely and may be quoted, copied or reproduced in any way, provided that extracts are not quoted out of context and due acknowledgement is given to the National Rivers Authority. © Crown Copyright The maps in this document are based on the Ordnance Survey and are reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Published July 1993 En v ir o n m e n t Ag en c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West. Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY IIIIIIINIII 099853 River Medway Catchment Management Plan RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT pdwiatlonal Rivers Authority ] 'nformation Centre FINAL PLAN Head Office Class N o _____________ __ CONTENTS Accession No .AlAA___ Page INTRODUCTION SECTION A : STATE OF THE CATCHMENT A.1 SUMMARY 7 AJ2 HYDROLOGY & RAINFALL 9 HZ WATER SUPPLY 11 A.4 USE OF THE WATER RESOURCE 15 A.5 LANDSCAPE & CONSERVATION 17 A.6 RECREATION & AMENITY 19 U FISHERIES & ANGUNG 21 A.8 WATER QUALITY 23 A.9 FLOOD DEFENCE 27 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential
    Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential Mott MacDonald mottmac.com Department for Transport Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report 18 November 2020 Confidential Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald | Confidential | Sevington Inland Border Facility An Analysis of the Likely Environmental Effects of the Development Report Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description P01 30/10/20 First draft P02 06/11/20 Final for Article 4 submission P03 18/11/20 Revised for final Article 4 submission Document reference: 419419 | 419419-MMD-XX-SV-RP-YE-0002 | P03 Information class: Secure This Report has been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the 'Client') in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of reliance with us (the 'Recipient(s)') may rely on the content, information or any views expressed in the Report. This Report is confidential and contains proprietary intellectual property and we accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this Report. No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made and no responsibility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Recipient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Report. For the avoidance of doubt this Report does not in any way purport to include any legal, insurance or financial advice or opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Medway
    NRA Southern 36 THE RIVER MEDWAY National Rivers Authority Nat. Southern Region Infon Guardians of Head C ce the Water Environment Class N o .... 4,.. RWjl widens between Rochester HYDROLOGY THE and Sheerness until the River Medway flows into the Thames Estuary. The Wealden rivers respond rapidly to rainfall and extremes o f RIVER The total length o f the main flow may vary five-hundredfold between summer and winter. Medway from source to the There are six flow gauging stations on the main river, three on the Estuary at Sheerness is 110km River Eden and three on the River Teise. The Eridge Stream, the MEDWAY (70 miles). The river has a Bartley Mill Stream and the Rivers Bourne, Bewl and Beult are also catchment area o f 1400 sq km gauged. above the tidal limit and 402 There are three water supply reservoirs in the Medway catchment, COURSE AND sq km b elow the tidal limit. Bough Beech, W eir Wood and Bewl Water. GEOLOGY HISTORY RESERVOIR VOLUME DESIGN YIELD WATER AREA LOCATION (Ml) (Ml/d) (ha) The River Medway rises in the Ashdown Forest as a spring The name o f the river may Bough Beech 8,630 22.7 113 Tributary of issuing from the Tunbridge derive from a Celtic word, (East Surrey River Eden Wells Sands just above Turners Medu meaning mead, presum­ Water Company) Hill. The sands and clays of the ably signifying a river with High Weald dictate the charac­ “sweet” water. The Romans Weir Wood 5,623 14.1 113 Upper Medway (Southern Water ter o f the river, w hich w ith its called the river Fluminus Services Ltd.) many deeply incised tributaries, Meduwaeias and the Saxons contrasts sharply with the chalk knew it as the Medwaeg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Farleighs, Boughton Monchelsea, the Loose Valley and the Roman Occupation
    The Farleighs, Boughton Monchelsea, The Loose Valley and the Roman Occupation. By Simon Elliott BSc MA (Arch) MA (War Studies) During the period when Britain was occupied by the Romans (AD43 through to the early 5th Century) both West Farleigh and East Farleigh played an important role as part of a dynamic industrial landscape in the Upper Medway Valley North-Western Kent. From the around AD50 the Medway Valley began to supply ragstone to enable the urbanization of the South East of the Province (later diocese) of Britannia, for example such building stone being used as part of the first forum in London (londinium) which began construction at this time. I believe that the ragstone was quarried from at least four sites along the River Medway. The furthest downriver was at Allington at around, or just above, the tidal reach on the River Medway. Upriver of Allington were three additional quarries, these being at Boughton Monchelsea on Medway tributary the Loose Stream, alongside Dean Street (a huge quarry) and at Teston. From wharfing on the river associated with these quarries sailing vessels would have carried loads of up to 50 tonnes of ragstone through to the Thames Estuary and then either west to London, north to Essex (where such ragstone has been found at Roman Colchester - camuludunum) or east to be used in Canterbury (durovernum cantiacorum), Richborough (rutupiae) and Dover (portus dubris). Each of these quarries is associated with villas where the elites tasked with managing the quarries would have lived, together with other settlement infrastructure. The well known site at East Farleigh featuring a villa with a temple was linked to the Dean Street quarry, while that around the river at Teston was linked with the Teston quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • JBA Consulting Report Template 2015
    Maidstone Borough Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment – Addendum Report Final Report October 2016 Maidstone Borough Council Maidstone House King Street Maidstone Kent ME15 6JQ JBA Project Manager Ben Gibson JBA Consulting 35 Perrymount Road Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 3BW Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v1 / June 2016 Draft addendum report, Cheryl Parks excluding updated climate (Maidstone Borough change information Council) Draft v2 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks comments received from (Maidstone Borough Cheryl Parks on 12 July Council) 2016 Draft v3 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks and draft comments raised by Adam Reynolds the Environment Agency (Maidstone Borough and received from Council) Maidstone Borough Council on 13 October 2016 Final v4 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks and final comments raised by the Adam Reynolds Environment Agency and (Maidstone Borough received from Maidstone Council) Borough Council on 19 October 2016 Contract This report describes work commissioned by Maidstone Borough Council. The Council's representative for the contract was Cheryl Parks. Georgina Latus and Ben Gibson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Georgina Latus BSc Technical Assistant ....................................................................... Ben Gibson BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Alastair Dale BSc PGDip MIAHR Director 2016s4269 - Maidstone SFRA Addendum - Final Report (v4 October 2016).docx i Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Maidstone Borough Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Medway Catchment Consists of the Through Nearby Farms
    al Lib n ra io r t i e a s N D n F t O a o n y e c s i K n u u c s o O F n l Lib n a F n ra O o o r i c s National Libraries Day in Kent t i u e a I was a part of it s N D Tourismt a n a y n e l i K o L n ti ib a r N a r I was i t e Set in 500 acres of beautiful Kent n L s nal ibr a part a e io r D t i K e L a parkland, Leeds Castle is the perfect al ib n y a i r s of it on a N i r D n F t i t O e a o a n s y e c s i K n backdrop to your day out. Last year, over N u D n F u t O a o n c s y e c s i K n u o 500,000 visitors enjoyed the historic u O c s F n o O Our river l Li n b a F castle, glorious gardens, attractions and n ra F n O o o r i c s National Libraries Day in Kent t i u e l Lib n a F a r I was a part of it s n a O o o programme of events. N r i c s D National Libraries Day in Kent t i u Farmingt e a a n I was a part of it s a y n e l i K n o L N i D i Historyt t b a Middle Medway n a y n e l i K a n r During its 900 year history, Leeds Castle io Li a t N a b r I was r a i t e Joint Working to Solve a has been a Norman stronghold, the N r n s I was a part i t e e The Loose Stream rises at Langley, D K n private property of six of England’s s a Particular Problem a part n y i of it e D K flows through the village of Loose, and Background on the Middle a n y i medieval queens, a palace used by of it Medway catchment Bough Beech Reservoir was constructed Henry VIII and during the 1930’s it was joins the Medway at Tovil.
    [Show full text]
  • VINTERS PARK NATURE RESERVE SILT LAGOON Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
    Kent County Council KENT MEDICAL CAMPUS TO M20 J7 IMPROVEMENTS: VINTERS PARK NATURE RESERVE SILT LAGOON Preliminary Ecological Appraisal MAY 2021 PUBLIC Kent County Council KENT MEDICAL CAMPUS TO M20 J7 IMPROVEMENTS: VINTERS PARK NATURE RESERVE SILT LAGOON Preliminary Ecological Appraisal TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70040984 DATE: MAY 2021 PUBLIC Kent County Council KENT MEDICAL CAMPUS TO M20 J7 IMPROVEMENTS: VINTERS PARK NATURE RESERVE SILT LAGOON Preliminary Ecological Appraisal WSP 4th Floor 6 Devonshire Square London EC2M 4YE Phone: +44 20 7337 1700 Fax: +44 20 7337 1701 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date May 2021 Prepared by Joel Rowlands Digitally signed by Joyce, Paul (UKPXJ022) DN: cn=Joyce, Paul (UKPXJ022), ou=Active, [email protected] Signature Reason: pp signing for the author, Joel Rowlands Date: 2021.05.27 14:23:31 +01'00' Checked by Paul Joyce Digitally signed by Joyce, Paul (UKPXJ022) DN: cn=Joyce, Paul (UKPXJ022), ou=Active, [email protected] Signature Reason: I have reviewed this document Date: 2021.05.27 14:23:01 +01'00' Authorised by Adrian Hutchings Digitally signed by Kirby, Dave (UKDRK600) DN: cn=Kirby, Dave (UKDRK600), ou=Active, [email protected] Reason: Signing on behalf of Signature Adrian Hutchings Date: 2021.05.28 08:07:16 +01'00' Project number 70040984 Report number File reference \\uk.wspgroup.com\central data\Projects\700409xx\70040984 - Kent Medical Campus to M20 J7\D Design & Analysis\Ecology\Attenuation
    [Show full text]
  • Watermills on the River Len
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society WATERIVIILLS ON THE RIVER LEN By ROBERT H. GOODSALL THE Len, the Little _River as Harris called it, which flows from a charming spring in Affers Wood, north of Platt's Heath and a mile and a quarter south-west of Lenham, joins the Medway at Maidstone, a distance of eight and a quarter miles as the crow flies and some ten miles by the winding of the stream. Together with its several diminutive tribu- taries, the Len supported more watermills for its length than any other Kent river except the Loose stream which had no less than thirteen mills along its three-miles course.1 For this there was a very good reason. Originally all were corn mills, but following the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, when so many foreigners flocked into the county bringing with them their Mystery of Cloth working, many settled in the Weald, at Cranbrook and the adjacent villages, and for their work the Len was, to quote Furley,2 " . formerly of great service to the clothiers of the Weald, especially in dry seasons, as fullers' earth was found in Leeds . and its neighbourhood, where fulling mills were erected, and cloths were brought from different parts of the Weald to be thicked ' at these mills." Of the veins of fullers' earth occurring in the Maidstone area of the county, that at Boxley was the largest and most famous,8 but the Leeds quarry situated immediately south of the Len downstream from the bridge carrying the Leeds road, must always have been an important source of supply.
    [Show full text]
  • River Medway Catchment Management Plan Phase 1
    i i' A - S~o J h V ' & '5 £> RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN PHASE 1 NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment © National Rivers Authority 1991 All rights reserved. No part o f this publication may he reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the National Rivers Authority. Environm ent Agency Information Services Unit Please return or renew this item by the due date Due Date NRA Grainger Davies Regional General Manager Our ref. National Rivers Authority B.Sc. C.Eng, MICE MIWEM Your ref. Southern Region River Medway Catchment Management Plan Phase 1 December 1991 FOREWORD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to preserve and improve the water environment and to protect people and property from flooding. In its role as "Guardian of the Water Environment", the NRA is committed to establishing a sound planning base for the future management and development of river catchments. These first catchment management plans will be a catalyst for achieving improvements in the water environment. As a vehicle for consultation they will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document they will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to achieving improvements. This plan is one of the first to be prepared in the country as a whole. I look forward to re ce ivin g the contributions of those people and organisations'most closely involved with the river and its surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 – 2014 Introduction and Overview
    Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy: A Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2009-2014 Introduction and Overview Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy A Local Biodiversity Action Plan Phase 1: 2009 – 2014 Introduction and Overview Page | 1 Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy: A Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2009-2014 Introduction and Overview Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 Biodiversity – What does it mean? ......................................................................................................... 4 Maidstone’s biodiversity ..................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of this strategy ...................................................................................................................... 4 Direct action and delivery ................................................................................................................... 4 Background to biodiversity ..................................................................................................................... 5 What is biodiversity?........................................................................................................................... 5 Why is biodiversity important? ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]