211 N9/D Ho, 231J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
211 N9/d Ho, 231J THE ANABAPTIST PURITY OF LIFE ETHIC DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Timothy Wayne Dalzell, B.A., M.A. Denton, Texas May, 19 85 Copyright by Timothy Wayne Dalzell 1985 Dalzell, Timothy Wayne, The Anabaptist Purity of Life Ethic. Doctor of Philosophy (History), May, 1985, 328 pp., biblio- graphy, 404 titles. This dissertation establishes that the Evangelical Ana- baptists lived a noticeably distinctive Christian life when compared with their peers, accounts for their committed pur- suit of holiness, and describes the outcome of that commit- ment. The sources used include the arranged archival source material in the Tauferakten, confessions, tracts, letters, debates, martyrologies, miscellaneous writings of the Ana- baptists, and subsequent scholarship on the subject. The first two chapters describe the character of the Anabaptists and their contemporaries. The Anabaptists emerge as charac- terized by living by a distinctive purity of life ethic. Ap- proval of this kind of life was not unanimous, for Anabaptists drew responses ranging from admiration, respect, and imitation to disparagement, persecution, and capital punishment. Ana- baptists cited their critics' way of life as an indictment against them, arguing that their ungodly conduct proved the inadequacy of their faith. The next three chapters discuss the bases upon which Anabaptists established their pursuit of holiness. Anabaptists began with strong statements about the Bible. Scripture was their supreme authority, and it was inerrant and thereby trustworthy• Since the Bible could be interpreted by the believer, there was no excuse for failing to live by its directives. Although Anabaptists taught that mankind was totally depraved, that did not prevent their quest for a godly life, because Christ's work on the cross renewed the believer's spiritual life and the subsequent in- dwelling of the Holy Spirit enabled the believer to imitate Christ's life. These supernatural provisions, Anabaptists believed, were to be facilitated within the context of the church which they described as being a voluntary entity com- posed of believers only. Believers joined that assembly by demonstrating by adult baptism that they were leaving the old life for a new one which would necessitate the support and aid of the entire assembly. This church life could only be pursued in an environment in which the state did not in- terfere. The last two chapters describe the life that Ana- baptists achieved. Anabaptists taught that the human race was obliged to determine which of the two powers vying for their allegiance they would embrace--God or Satan. Those who chose to be a child of God were aliens whose conduct was offensive to the world. Armed with a distinctly Christian way of life and an apocalyptic message, Anabaptists volun- tarily aided their brothers and sought to evangelize their world while enduring severe persecution and hoping for ul- timate justice in Christ's return to Earth to set up His kingdom. The Anabaptists' interpretation of life suggests an answer to the ultimate questions that have been investi- gated over the centuries. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: DEFINING THE ISSUE Chapter 1 SOCIETY'S ASSESSMENT OF ANABAPTISM'S MORALITY . 17 Positive statements Negative statements 2 ANABAPTISM'S ASSESSMENT OF SOCIETY'S MORALITY . 48 Correct doctrine but inconsistent practice Sola gratia, sola fide, and license PART 2: ESTABLISHING THE BASES 3 BIBLIOLOGY: BASIS FOR ANABAPTISM 7 5 Authority of the Bible Inerrancy of the Bible Hermeneutics and the Bible Practice of the Bible 4 SOTERIOLOGY: BASIS FOR A NEW WAY OF LIFE .... 112 Nature of Man Person of Christ Work of Christ Nature of Faith Person of the Holy Spirit Work of the Holy Spirit 5 ECCLESIOLOGY: BASIS FOR STABILITY 149 Nature of baptism Purpose of baptism Nature of the Church Purpose of the Church Church discipline PART 3: DESCRIBING THE LIFE Chapter 6 DISCIPLESHIP: LIFE IN THE CHURCH 206 Kingdom theology Nature of discipleship Community life 7 MARTYRDOM: LIFE OUTSIDE THE CHURCH 246 Theology of martyrdom Theology of history Philosophy of life SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 289 BIBLIOGRAPHY 301 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS A.R.G. = Archiv fur Reformationsqeschichte C.W.M.S. = Simons, Menno. The Complete Writings of Menno Simons, c.1496-1561. Trans- lated by Leonard Verduin and edited by John C. Wenger with biography by Harold S. Bender. Scottdale, Penn.: Mennonite Publishing House, 1956. M.E. = Mennonite Encyclopedia. 4 vols. Scott- dale, Penn.: Mennonite Publishing House, 1955-59. M.Q.R. = Mennonite Quarterly Review Ouellen Hesse = Franz, Giinther, ed. Urkundliche Quellen zur hessischen Reformationsqeschichte, Vierter Band, Wiedertauferakten, 1527- 1626. Marburg: Veroffentl. der Hist. Komm. fur Hesse und Waldeck, 1951. Quellen II = Schornbaum, Karl, ed. Quellen zur Geschichte der Wiedertaufer, II Band, Markgraftum Brandenberq, Bayern I. Leipzig: M. Heinsius Nachfolger, 1934. Quellen IV = Krebs, Manfred, ed. Quellen zur Geschichte der Taufer, IV Band, Baden und Pfaltz. Gutersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1951. Quellen VI = Muralt, Leonard von and Schmidt, Walter, eds. Ouellen zur Geschichte der Taufer in der Schweiz, I Band, Zurich. Zurich: S. Hirzel Verlag, 1952. Quellen VII = Krebs, Manfred and Rott, Jean, eds. Quellen zur Geschichte der Taufer, VII Band, Elsas; I Teil, Stadt Strassburq, 1522- 32. Gutersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1959. Quellen IX = Hiibmaier, Balthasar. Quellen zur Geschichte der Taufer, IX Band, Balthasar Hiibmaier Schriften. Edited by Gunnar Westin and Torsten Bergsten. Gutersloh: Gerd Mohn, 19 6 2. vii Vlll S.A.W. = Williams, George Huntston and Mergal, Angel M. , eds. Spiritual and Anabaptist Writers. Philadelphia: The Westmin- ster Press, 1957. INTRODUCTION One of the recurrent questions that historians, philos- ophers, and theologians have debated is the multi-faceted controversy concerning the relationship of Christianity and society. This debate has focused on so many aspects of the relationship that confusion and frustration are as much a part of this controversy as is its persistence. Currently the perplexity continues in the form of such complex questions as should the government grant tuition tax credits to parents sending their children to private schools? Should voluntary prayer be allowed back in public schools? Should the Christian community challenge the Supreme Court decisions on abortion, birth control for teenagers, the teaching of evolution, and the like? Yet whether this struggle is examined in its contemporary di- lemmas, or whether it is studied at any increment of the previous centuries in which Christianity has existed, one thing emerges as a common denominator of all the develop- ments through which this controversy has evolved: there has been no definitive Christian answer for or conclusion reached on the controversy surrounding the relationship of Christianity and civilization. 1 2 While there has been no definitive answer for or con- clusion reached in this debate, there are a number of trends that thought on this subject has taken.1 However, the results of most attempts to reduce the extensive quanti- ties of data to a manageable number of trends often evoke accusations of oversimplification or of missing the point entirely. Even so, in order to reach the focal point of this project expeditiously, only the perimeters of the issue are to be noted. Throughout Christian history, efforts have been made to accommodate Christianity to society in order to synthe- size them or to establish a compatibility between the two. These attempts have frequently been the subjects of attacks as persistent as the efforts to harmonize have been. The protests against the integration of Christianity and society have generally focused on the extent to which the synthe- sizers compromised the essence of Christianity in order to effect the accommodation; i.e., the standard protest has not been a tangential anti-society solution in which Christianity and society are described as being fundamen- tally antithetical entities, but it has been a reaction against the extent to which Christianity has been compro- mised in order to accommodate it to society. Thus, there appeared, on the one hand, synthesizers who sought to ^Medievalist Etienne Gilson has provided a fine anal- ysis in Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1938), as has theologian and philos- opher H. Richard Niebuhr in Christ and Culture (New York: Harper S. Row, Publishers, 1951). 3 harmonize Christianity and society and, on the other hand, protesters who viewed the two as essentially irreconcilable. Both extremes frequent the pages of the history of the church to the extent that a third approach is often not given careful consideration. The "middle ground" between the two extremes recog- nizes that there are great differences between Christian- ity and society as the protesters suggest, but like the syn- thesizers, it attempts to preserve a relationship between Christianity and society without creating conflict or caus- ing either to lose its distinctiveness from or relevance to the other. Roland H. Bainton, summarizing this position, succinctly argues that "if there is no accommodation [to society], Christianity is unintelligible and cannot spread. If there is too much accommodation it will spread, but it will no longer be Christianity."2 The struggle to establish this kind of delicate balance is precisely what contributed significantly to the wide diversity among the reforming groups of the sixteenth century Reformation movement. It is not the purpose of this work to restate or even revise the various schools of interpretation concerning the "middle ground" position of the Reformation. Rather, the task here is to focus on one small segment of this central, mediating group, to isolate it, and to analyze 2Roland H. Bainton, "The Enduring Witness: The Mennon- ites," Mennonite Life 9(1954):89. its reasoning in the light of one of its distinctives, i.e., its purity of life ethic.