DOCSLIB.ORG

For the Arctic – Protection of the Marine Mammals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For the Arctic – Protection of the Marine Mammals The “scramble” for the Arctic – protection of the marine mammals (Increasing activity, increasing noise, increasing threats – legal regulation) - LLM in Natural Resources and International Environmental Law - Eva Balounová Faculty of Law School of Social Sciences Pétur Dam Leifsson May 2014 HÁSKÓLI ÍSLANDS 1 Table of Contents Prologue ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 The Arctic ......................................................................................................................... 6 2 The legal regime of the Arctic – the legal instruments ........................................................... 7 2.1 The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea ...................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Ratification by the Arctic States ................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 Applicability to the Arctic region ............................................................................ 10 2.1.3 Protection and preservation of the marine environment .......................................... 11 2.1.4 Article 234 ............................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Regional agreements in respect with LOS Convention .................................................. 12 2.2.1 Ilulissat Declaration ................................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution, Preparedness and Response in the Arctic ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 The role of the institutions .............................................................................................. 14 2.3.1 The Arctic Council ................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Other cooperation ..................................................................................................... 16 2.4 The Arctic Policy of the Arctic States ............................................................................ 19 2.4.1 The Russian Federation ............................................................................................ 19 2.4.2 The USA .................................................................................................................. 21 2.4.3 Canada ...................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.4 Norway ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.5 Denmark/Greenland ................................................................................................. 23 2.4.6 Iceland ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.7 Finland and Sweden ................................................................................................. 27 2.4.8 European Union ....................................................................................................... 28 2.4.9 Chinese influence ..................................................................................................... 28 3 The Continental Shelf ............................................................................................................ 30 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 Claims of the States ........................................................................................................ 33 3.2.1 The position of the USA .......................................................................................... 38 3.3 The controversy .............................................................................................................. 39 2 3.3.1 The Lomonosov Ridge ............................................................................................. 39 3.3.2 Hans Island ............................................................................................................... 42 3.4 The process: “from claim to a right” .............................................................................. 45 3.4.1 Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf ................................................ 45 4 Oil and gas drilling ................................................................................................................ 49 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 49 4.2 The major challenges of development of the resources ................................................. 50 4.2.1 The environmental danger of Arctic drilling ........................................................... 50 4.3 International and regional regulation .............................................................................. 53 4.4 The USA – example of the national legislation .............................................................. 53 4.5 Impacts of Offshore Oil and Gas development on the marine mammals ....................... 55 5 Arctic shipping ...................................................................................................................... 58 5.1 The possible routes ......................................................................................................... 59 5.2 Legal regulation .............................................................................................................. 63 5.2.1 A Polar Code ............................................................................................................ 63 5.2.2 Russia – example of current national regulation ...................................................... 64 5.3 Underwater noise pollution from shipping ..................................................................... 65 5.3.1 The threat for marine mammals ............................................................................... 68 6 Legal protection of marine mammals in the Arctic ............................................................... 69 6.1 Marine mammals in the Arctic and the threads from underwater noise pollution ......... 69 6.1.1 Sound, noise ............................................................................................................. 71 6.2 Protection of marine mammals – legal regulation .......................................................... 74 6.2.1 Protection through protected areas ........................................................................... 76 6.3 Particular marine mammals and its protection ............................................................... 78 6.3.1 Whales and Whaling ................................................................................................ 78 6.3.2 Walruses ................................................................................................................... 84 6.3.3 Seals ......................................................................................................................... 85 6.3.4 Polar Bear ................................................................................................................. 86 6.4 The legal regulation of the underwater noise, impact on marine mammals ................... 88 6.4.1 United Nations and the noise pollution .................................................................... 89 6.4.2 Noise pollution under other cooperation .................................................................. 91 6.4.3 Protection through the environmental principles ..................................................... 93 6.4.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 95 3 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 96 7.1 The present situation ....................................................................................................... 96 7.2 The possible future ......................................................................................................... 96 7.3 Reduction of the impact of ice-free Arctic on marine mammals ................................... 99 Table of treaties, cases and other documents ......................................................................... 103 References .............................................................................................................................. 104 Books .............................................................................................................................. 104 Articles ............................................................................................................................ 104 Internet sources ............................................................................................................... 108 4 Prologue When I was visiting Iceland for the first time, I tried the very popular touristic activity – whale-watching. It
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Arctic Through-Flow 2012 Cruise to Nares Strait
    Canadian Arctic Through-flow 2012 Cruise to Nares Strait CCGS Henry Larsen August 2-17, 2012 Institute of Ocean Sciences Cruise 2012-20 Humfrey Melling – Chief Scientist Fisheries & Oceans Canada Collaborating Institutions: Institute of Ocean Sciences, University of Delaware, Oxford University, Danish Technical University, Scottish Association for Marine Science 1 Cover photo, courtesy of Jason Box: View looking south across the Petermann ice shelf towards Joe Island, Kennedy Channel and Ellesmere Island at the horizon. Note the small ice-shelf fragments in the foreground and cracks within the protruding lobe of the ice . The photograph taken in 2009, before the large ice islands calved from the shelf in August 2010 and again in July 2012. 2 Report on the Scientific Cruise of CCGS Henry Larsen, August 2012 Canadian Arctic Through-flow CCGS Henry Larsen in Nares Strait August 2-17, 2012 Overview The Canadian Arctic Through-flow (CAT) study embodies ten years’ effort within Canada and the international community to measure flows of seawater and ice through the Canadian Archipelago, between the Arctic and the Atlantic Oceans. CATs is the outgrowth of a pilot effort, the Arctic Canada Watch, established in 1997. Moorings enabling year-round measurements were first placed in western Lancaster Sound and Cardigan Strait in 1998. These carried instruments to measure current, temperature and salinity and utilized innovations to address the unique challenges of observing: 1) current direction near the geomagnetic pole; 2) salinity within the hazardous 30-m zone beneath drifting ice pack. These early installations have been maintained and augmented since 1998. In 2003, a large array of instruments was installed across the third principal path for Canadian Arctic through-flow, Nares Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CLIMATE CASE AGAINST ARCTIC DRILLING August 2015
    AUGUST 2015 UNTOUCHABLE: THE CLIMATE CASE AGAINST ARCTIC DRILLING August 2015 Conceived, written and researched by Hannah McKinnon with contributions from Steve Kretzmann, Lorne Stockman, and David Turnbull Oil Change International (OCI) exposes the true costs of fossil fuels and identifies and overcomes barriers to the coming transition towards clean energy. Oil Change International works to achieve its mission by producing strategic research and hard-hitting, campaign-relevant investigations; engaging in domestic and international policy and media spaces; and providing leadership in and support for resistance to the political influence of the fossil fuel industry, particularly in North America. www.priceofoil.org Twitter: @priceofoil Greenpeace is the leading independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and to promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. www.greenpeace.org Cover: ©Cobbing/Greenpeace CONTENTS SUMMARY 2 Key Findings 3 UNBURNABLE CARBON 4 ARCTIC OIL FAILS THE CLIMATE TEST 5 THE PERCEPTION OF NEED AND A BET ON CLIMATE FAILURE 6 Arctic Oil Is Too Expensive for the Climate 8 LEADING THE PACK IN THE HUNT FOR UNBURNABLE CARBON 10 STRANDED ASSETS 11 FOSSIL FUEL FATALISM 13 #SHELLNO: PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY RISKS 14 CONCLUSION 16 2 SUMMARY There is a clear logic that can be applied to the global challenge of addressing climate change: when you are in a hole, stop digging. An iceberg spotted in calm waters on the edge of Kane Basin, If we are serious about tackling the global climate crisis, we need in late evening light. to stop exploring, expanding, and ultimately exploiting fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Cruise Report: Mission HLY031
    Research Cruise Report: Mission HLY031 Conducted aboard USCGC Healy In Northern Baffi n Bay and Nares Strait 21 July –16 August 2003 Project Title: Variability and Forcing of Fluxes through Nares Strait and Jones Sound: A Freshwater Emphasis Sponsored by the US National Science Foundation, Offi ce of Polar Programs, Arctic Division Table of Contents Introduction by Chief Scientist . 4 Science Program Summary . 6 Science Party List . 7 Crew List . 8 Science Component Reports CTD-Rosette Hydrography . 9 Internally recording CTD . 29 Kennedy Channel Moorings . 33 Pressure Array . 41 Shipboard ADCP . 47 Bi-valve Retrieval . 51 Coring . 55 Seabeam Mapping . 65 Aviation Science Report . 71 Ice Report . 79 Weather Summary . 91 Inuit Perspective . 95 Photojournalist Perspective . 101. Website Log . 105 Chief Scientist Log . 111 Recommendations . .125 Introduction Dr. Kelly Kenison Falkner Chief Scientist Oregon State University In the very early hours of July 17, 2003, I arrived at collected via the ship’s Seabeam system and the underway the USCGC Healy moored at the fueling pier in St. John’s thermosalinograph system was put to good use throughout Newfoundland, Canada to assume my role as chief scientist much of the cruise. for an ambitious interdisciplinary mission to Northern Part of our success can be attributed to luck with Mother Baffi n Bay and Nares St. This research cruise constitutes Nature. Winds and ice worked largely in our favor as we the inaugural fi eld program of a fi ve year collaborative wound our way northward. Our winds were generally research program entitled Variability and Forcing of moderate and out of the south and the ice normal to light.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Hans Island and the Potential Ramifications for International Border Disupute Resolution , 30 B.C
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 30 Issue 1 Sharpening the Cutting Edge of International Article 16 Human Rights Law: Unresolved Issues of War Crimes Tribunals 12-1-2007 Hans Off!: The trS uggle for Hans Island and the Potential Ramifications for International Border Disupute Resolution Christopher Stevenson Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher Stevenson, Hans Off!: The Struggle for Hans Island and the Potential Ramifications for International Border Disupute Resolution , 30 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 263 (2007), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol30/iss1/16 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HANS OFF!: THE STRUGGLE FOR HANS ISLAND AND THE POTENTIAL RAMIFICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL BORDER DISPUTE RESOLUTION Christopher Stevenson* Abstract: As global warming continues to warm the Arctic seas, more of the Arctic is free of ice for longer periods. The possibilities for exploita- tion of natural resources and for control over Northern shipping lanes have prompted countries’ renewed interest in their competing claims to the region. Recently, Denmark and Canada have clashed over their com- peting claims to a small, uninhabitable rock known as Hans Island. While this island may not seem signiªcant, the eventual resolution of this border dispute may have widespread ramiªcations for the resolution of interna- tional conºicts in other remote, uninhabited areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Arctic North Greenland
    SPECIAL OFFER -SAVE £300 PER PERSON THE CANADIAN ARCTIC & NORTH GREENLAND AN EXPLORATION OF THE HIGH ARCTIC ABOARD THE HANSEATIC INSPIRATION 4 TH TO 23RD AUGUST 2023 Sisimiut or this expedition we are delighted to be working with our associates at Ice conditions determine FHapag-Lloyd Cruises and their five-star vessel, the Hanseatic Inspiration. the course This unusual voyage combines the remote Canadian Arctic with its diverse Ellesmere Island Hans Island Pim Island wildlife, history and rich Inuit culture with Greenland’s west coast of great ares trait mith ound towering cliffs, walls of glacial ice, winding fjords, vast icesheets and flowing Etah iorapaluk glaciers. evon Island aanaa ape ork The expedition begins with five days of exploration of the CanadianArctic. Lying north of mainland Canada, the Canadian Arctic Archipelago consists of CANADA 94 major islands and forms the world’s largest High Arctic land area. Here we Baffin Island GRNLAND follow in the footsteps of the legendary explorers including Amundsen, Baffin and Franklin, who over the course of 300 years risked their lives to search the Arctic for the fabled Northwest Passage between the Atlantic and the Pacific ummanna Oceans. Our journey continues to coastal Greenland, one of the last great Ilulissat wilderness areas where man has made little difference to the landscape and isko a isimiut tourists are still a rarity. It is a marvel to behold; for most visitors their first angerlussua encounter with Greenland is a humbling experience as they witness nature in Arctic ircle the raw and look out across a magnificent Arctic world.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of Strike-Slip Displacements Along and Bordering Nares Strait
    Polarforschung 74 (1-3), 129 – 160, 2004 (erschienen 2006) In Search of the Wegener Fault: Re-Evaluation of Strike-Slip Displacements Along and Bordering Nares Strait by J. Christopher Harrison1 Abstract: A total of 28 geological-geophysical markers are identified that lich der Bache Peninsula und Linksseitenverschiebungen am Judge-Daly- relate to the question of strike slip motions along and bordering Nares Strait. Störungssystem (70 km) und schließlich die S-, später SW-gerichtete Eight of the twelve markers, located within the Phanerozoic orogen of Kompression des Sverdrup-Beckens (100 + 35 km). Die spätere Deformation Kennedy Channel – Robeson Channel region, permit between 65 and 75 km wird auf die Rotation (entgegen dem Uhrzeigersinn) und ausweichende West- of sinistral offset on the Judge Daly Fault System (JDFS). In contrast, eight of drift eines semi-rigiden nördlichen Ellesmere-Blocks während der Kollision nine markers located in Kane Basin, Smith Sound and northern Baffin Bay mit der Grönlandplatte zurückgeführt. indicate no lateral displacement at all. Especially convincing is evidence, presented by DAMASKE & OAKEY (2006), that at least one basic dyke of Neoproterozoic age extends across Smith Sound from Inglefield Land to inshore eastern Ellesmere Island without any recognizable strike slip offset. INTRODUCTION These results confirm that no major sinistral fault exists in southern Nares Strait. It is apparent to both earth scientists and the general public To account for the absence of a Wegener Fault in most parts of Nares Strait, that the shape of both coastlines and continental margins of the present paper would locate the late Paleocene-Eocene Greenland plate boundary on an interconnected system of faults that are 1) traced through western Greenland and eastern Arctic Canada provide for a Jones Sound in the south, 2) lie between the Eurekan Orogen and the Precam- satisfactory restoration of the opposing lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
    SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL CONTENTS 01 Message from the Executive Director 03 02 Message from our Board Chair 04 Our Board Of Directors 05 03 The Global Programme 06 A new way of working 08 The Greenpeace fleet 10 Renewing energy 12 Saving the Arctic 14 Saving the Arctic: The Arctic 30 16 Protecting our forests 20 Defending our oceans 22 Detoxing our world 24 Celebrating ecological food and farming 26 04 People power 28 Our dedicated volunteers 30 Your support: Thank you! 32 05 Organisation Director’s report 36 Greenpeace worldwide abbreviated financial statements 38 Greenpeace International abbreviated financial statements 42 Environmental report 46 Staff members on permanent contract 48 06 Office contact details 50 Written and edited by: Matt Farquharson, Edwin Nichols. We would also like to thank everybody who contributed to this Annual Report. Art Direction and Design by: Atomo Design www.atomodesign.nl Cover image: © Daniel Beltrá / Greenpeace JN 472 © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace © Rose Sjölander / Greenpeace 2 Greenpeace International Annual Report 2013 SECTION MESSAGE 01 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Campaigning for a peaceful, just and green future is no longer the job of a specialised few, but the common struggle of all. As the distance between rich and poor grows, and the grip of old power systems wreaks ever more havoc on the natural world, our struggle will and must intensify. The old, polluting industries will not give up without a fight. They have had several hundred years at the top, they exert a corrupting influence at every level of our governments and institutions. We must break their grip on all forms of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Kvinner Og Natur
    Women and Natural Resource Management in the Rural North Arctic Council Sustainable Development Working Group 2004-2006 By Lindis Sloan (ed) Joanna Kafarowski Anna Heilmann Anna Karlsdóttir Bente Aasjord Maria Udén May-Britt Öhman Nandita Singh Sanna Ojalammi Women and Natural Resource Management in the Rural North Arctic Council Sustainable Development Working Group 2004-2006 By Lindis Sloan (ed) Joanna Kafarowski Anna Heilmann Anna Karlsdóttir Bente Aasjord Maria Udén May-Britt Öhman Nandita Singh Sanna Ojalammi Published by Forlaget Nora Kvinneuniversitetet Nord N-8286 Nordfold Layout: Pure Line Design, Nordfold. www.PureLine.Norge.cc Cover photo: International Steering Committee member Lene Kielsen Holm on the lulissat ice fjord, June 2006. Photo: Anna Heilmann. ISBN: 82-92038-02 Contents Preface . 7 Concluding remarks from the project work group and international steering committee . 9 A human security perspective . 10 Women and Natural Resource Management in the Rural North . 12 Project summaries . 17 Canada . 19 Greenland . 37 Iceland . 73 Norway . 97 Sweden . 129 Finland . 155 5 6 Preface “Women and Natural Resource Management “Management of natural, including living, in the Rural North” is a continuation of the resources”. Analysing natural resource-based 2003-2004 Arctic Council SDWG project industries in the Arctic in terms of women’s “Women’s participation in decision-making participation in these sectors covers both processes in Arctic fisheries resource manage- these points. ment”, which presented its report to the Developing prosperous and resilient local Ministers in Reykjavik. communities depends on achieving social sustainability, including economic activities The “Women and Natural Resource in the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of LEGO's Response to an Attack on Its Partnership With
    60 — Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, Vol. 7, No. 1 • Spring 2016 An Analysis of LEGO’s Response to an Attack on its Partnership with Royal Dutch Shell MaryClaire Schulz Strategic Communications Elon University Abstract In 2014, Greenpeace launched an attack on a 50-year brand partnership between Danish toy company LEGO and Royal Dutch Shell, an oil and gas corporation. Through the analysis of Greenpeace’s campaign and LEGO’s responses over a three-month period, this case study examined how Greenpeace influenced LEGO’s communications with its consumers and its subsequent decision to terminate its partnership with Shell. Findings suggest that the popularity of a Greenpeace viral video played a role in LEGO’s decision, in addition to accusations questioning LEGO’s investment in children’s futures. I. Introduction In light of worldwide economic hardship and an increasingly competitive business market, it seems that a family-owned business specializing in the manufacturing of tiny plastic building bricks would be struggling for success. But careful craftsmanship coupled with decades of strategic branding has led the Danish toy company LEGO Group to become one of the most popular toy companies in the world. However, LEGO’s 50-year partnership with oil and gas corporation Royal Dutch Shell caught the attention of Greenpeace in July 2014, which launched a campaign attacking the toy company for supporting a corporation threatening the Arctic environment. Greenpeace’s attack on the partnership peaked with its release of a YouTube video titled “LEGO: Everything is NOT awesome,” a work by BAFTA-winning creative agency Don’t Panic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, Geopolitical, Environmental, and Socioeconomic Impacts
    Marine Policy xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol The opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, geopolitical, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts Mia M. Bennett a,*, Scott R. Stephenson b, Kang Yang c,d,e, Michael T. Bravo f, Bert De Jonghe g a Department of Geography and School of Modern Languages & Cultures (China Studies Programme), Room 8.09, Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong b RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA c School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China d Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210023, China e Collaborative Innovation Center for the South Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China f Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK g Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT With current scientifc models forecasting an ice-free Central Arctic Ocean (CAO) in summer by mid-century and potentially earlier, a direct shipping route via the North Pole connecting markets in Asia, North America, and Europe may soon open. The Transpolar Sea Route (TSR) would represent a third Arctic shipping route in addition to the Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage. In response to the continued decline of sea ice thickness and extent and growing recognition within the Arctic and global governance communities of the need to anticipate
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2014
    DANISH FOREIGN POLICY YEARBOOK 2014 FOREIGN POLICY DANISH DANISH FOREIGN POLICY YEARBOOK 2 014 ISBN: 978-87-7605-691-9 ISSN 1397-2480 EDITED BY NANNA HVIDT AND HANS MOURITZEN 9 7 8 8 7 7 6 0 5 6 9 1 9 DIIS · DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES DIIS 2011 OMSLAG.indd 1 7/4/14 12:19 PM DANISH FOREIGN POLICY YEARBOOK 2014 Edited by Nanna Hvidt and Hans Mouritzen DIIS Danish Institute for International Studies 2014 danish_foreign_policy_2014.indd 1 7/8/14 2:53 PM © Copenhagen 2014 DIIS ∙ Danish Institute for International Studies Østbanegade 117, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph.: +45 32 69 87 87 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Editors: Nanna Hvidt ([email protected]) and Hans Mouritzen ([email protected]) Assistant: Jakob Dreyer Linguistic Consultant: Jessica Lerche Graphic Design: Carsten Schiøler Print: Gullanders Bogtrykkeri a-s, Denmark ISBN: Print: 978-87-7605-691-9 PDF: 978-87-7605-692-6 ISSN 1397-2480 The full text of this book can also be found electronically in EBSCO Publishing’s databases. DIIS publications can be obtained from the booksellers or ordered at [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board Clive Archer, Manchester Metropolitan University Hans Branner, Retd. Eric Einhorn, University of Massachusetts Daniel Hamilton, The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies Christine Ingebritsen, University of Washington, Seattle Tonny Brems Knudsen, University of Aarhus Henrik Larsen, University of Copenhagen Sverre Lodgaard, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Ove Kai Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School Sten
    [Show full text]