DOCSLIB.ORG

Curatorial Lunar Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curatorial Lunar Newsletter LUNAR SAMPLE NEWSLETTER NUMBER 44 JULY 19, 1985 Douglas P. Blanchard . Lunar Sample Curator John W. Dietrich. Newsletter Editor Planetary Materials Branch. SN2. NASA/ JSC Houston . Texas 77058. 713-483-3274 CONTENTS Page WORKSHOP ON THE GEOLOGY AND PETROLOGY OF THE APOLLO 15 LANDING SITE 2 PRELIMINARY AGENDA--WORKSHOP ON THE GEOLOGY AND PETROLOGY OF THE APOLLO 15 LANDING SITE 6 LPSC XVI LUNAR SAMPLE FIELD TRIPS A BIG SUCCESS 8 NEXT LAPST MEETING WILL BE NOVEMBER 16-18, 1985 9 STUDY OF NEW BRECCIA SURFACES CONTINUES 9 UPCOMING DATES OF INTEREST 10 APPENDIX I: MAPPING OF BRECCIA 14303 11 1 , ., WORKSHOP ON THE GEOLOGY AND PETROLOGY OF THE APOLLO 15 LANDING SITE November 13-15, 1985 at LPI, Houston (Co-convenors: P. Spudis (U.S.G.S.) and G. Ryder (LPI» The geology of the Apollo 15 landing site remains poorly understood, in contrast with that of the geology and samples of the Apollo 16 and 17 landing sites. The Apollo 15 site is on the rim of the Imbrium basin, the remains of a paramount event in lunar geologic history. It encompasses a remarkably complete stratigraphic section ranging from pre-Imbrian to Copernican, unique among Apollo sites. Within the Apollo 15 samples, site photographs, surface experiments, and crew reports is recorded a variety of lunar processes and historical events, many of which are at present only dimly perceived. The petrology and stratigraphy of site materials are relevant to lunar crustal composition, formation, and origin, the mechanics and ejecta depositional processes of craters ranging from large basins to secondary clusters; and a whole gamut of volcanic processes. However, the Apollo 15 mission has often been felt to have received short shrift and to have been overshadowed by the succeeding Apollo 16 landing. It has never had a "conference of its own" at which multidisciplinary approaches could focus on its scientific opportunities. There is a perception that we have glaring deficiencies in our understanding which would be remedied by a multidisciplinary examination of the Apollo 15 landing site, especially in the light of the results from other missions. To examine a.nd synthesize our present knowledge, to discuss and dispute varied pertinent concepts, and to formulate research directions likely to advance our understanding of the landing site and of the moon, the Lunar and Planetary Institute, at the instigation of LAPST, is sponsoring a "Workshop on the Geology and Petrology of the Apollo 15 Landing Site." Keynote talks, contributed papers, and discussions are being arranged around eight main topics, following keynote presentations providing background (see preliminary agenda, below). Following the meeting, the contributed and invited abstracts and summaries of the discussion sessions will be published as an LIP Tech- nical Report. Members of the prime, backup, and support crews have expressed great interest in participating in the Workshop. In the following paragraphs we summarize, in order of the Workshop topics, some of the rationale and questions which future studies might at least partly answer. Sampling of the Apennine Front was the prime target of the Apollo 15 mission, yet its petrology remains one of the major outstanding problems . The talus deposit on the lower slopes of Hadley Delta is dominated by mare debris and mare-rich breccias; highlands materials is generally cryptic or at least small. Small samples, including coarse-fines from the regoliths, were scantily regarded in the Apollo mission days, partly because of time constraints. These small samples are now a target for study. Why was so little highlands materials found? Is the Front dominantly very friable material? A rough average composition appears to be some form of low-K Fra Mauro (LKFM, a low-KREEP basaltic composition), and there are some impact melts of this broad composition: these might represent Imbrium basin impact melt. We do not know the range of compositions in the highlands, although igneous ferroan anorthites, norites, and troctolites have been found. These cannot mix to produce the average; the LKFM composition has so far been 2 found as non-igneous rocks and its origin is a recurring question which investigation of the Front samples might solve. The regolith throughout the site contains highlands components, mostly in a cryptic form. Up to the present, petrographic studies of particle populations and synthesis of chemistry (especially mixing models) have not been particularly directed at defining the highlands materials. Not until the terra components are identified can the events and processes 'which formed them be deciphered. The common pre-mission interpretation of massif materiais forming the Front is of an Imbrium and Serenitatis basin origin. The sample suite is at present too poorly understood to adequately assess this interpretation, or whether other sources also provided Front material. Can material identified at the Apollo 17 site, e.g., the Serenitatis melt sheet, be identified among the Apollo 15 samples? Ejecta comprises older material: there are some deeply-derived, lower crustal (?) samples in the collection but their significance has not been adequately discussed. Basin-related rocks and ejecta can provide much information about multi-ring basin formation. Volcanic KREEP basalts were an unexpected discovery among the Apollo 15 samples. They are ubiquitous and numerous but small: only two are individually numbered rocks and the largest is 7.5 g. Their investigation is essential in shedding light on the development of KREEP on the moon. They have crystallization ages of ~ 3.85 b.y. and according to Sr-isotopic studies at least two distinct extrusions have been sampled. Their age cannot yet be distinguished from that of the Imbrium impact, but there is evidence that they are derived from the Apennine Bench Formation, hence are post-Imbrium. Was pressure-release significant in their genesis? The number of flows, their fractionation, and their origin is not yet known. How did they get distributed around the site as tiny fragments? - from beneath the local mare units or delivered laterally by rays? Why are their rare earth abundances so much lower than the Apollo 14 (brecciated) KREEP? How does the much older zircon age of the quartz-monzodiorite clasts in 15405 fit in with KREEP petrogenesis? A few workers remain un convinced of the origin of Apollo 15 KREEP as volcanic flows, suggesting instead that they are impact melts, perhaps from Imbrium itself. The Apollo 15 highlands, once its composition and stratigraphy have been established, offers a perspective on lunar basins, especially with inte- gration of information from other landing sites. One important potentially solvable question is the age of the Imbrium basin. Can we identify Imbrium basin ejecta at Apollos 14 and 16 and compare it with that of Apollo 15? What can cratering mechanics and . remote sensing tell us about the target stratigraphy? Understanding the relationship between Apollo 15 KREEP basalts and the Imbrium basin is of fundamental importance in establishing crustal responses to large impacts and the thermal state of the moon's crust at ~ 3.9 b.y. ago. How did the pronounced layering at Silver Spur form? Cratering mechanics and the lateral and vertical redistribution of crustal materials are intimately related. Understanding of Imbrium ejecta and its distribution is a profitable approach towards understanding these problems. Hadley Rille was an important target and has been well-described, but its origin as a lava channel or tube is not undisputed. But even if it is a lava . tube, the mechanism of its formation is unclear. It has not been clearly related to any of the sampled lavas. Can the features seen in its walls be 3 adequately correlated with the known characteristics of the rocks, for ' instance the thickness of flows as determined from samples? The rille might expose unsampled lava types. If so, then we need to explain how Apollo 15 ·!CREEP volcanics and the yellow volcanic glasses were distributed around the landing site without exposing them. Perhaps distinct mare volcanics do exist as small samples (e.g., coarse fines) but have not been recognized. There is a dark feature around the base of the _massifs which has been disputably interpreted as a "high lava" mark. Is there an episode of lava ponding recorded within the mare basalt samples? The landing site lies upon a topographic ridge, and to the north is the raised mound of the North Complex, a planned sampling location not eventually visited. Are these features mare-related or older (e.g., Apollo 15 !CREEP)? The inventory of basalt types has not necessarily been completed, because some small samples have not been adequately characterized and yet seem to be distinct. The olivine-normative and quartz-normative mare basalts are distinct in major element chemisty, yet have indistinguishable ages and isotopic systematics, and almost identical trace element patterns. The proper interpretation of this puzzling feature has never been addressed, yet surely is of deep significance for the petrogenesis of mare basalts in general. Several geochemists have suggested on the basis of small differences in trace element ratios that the two main mare basalts have sub-groups. If the existence of these sub-groups is verified, they have import for mantle processes or assimilations. Hadley Rille formation might include assimilation if it incorporated downcutting. Can recent suggestions that terrestrial komatrites assimilated older flows guide us in interpretations of Hadley Rille and the chemistry of the mare basalts? Where are the source vents for the lavas and what are they like? If the vents are some distance away, then it is quite likely that surface fractionati on has occurred and that the magmas as erupted have not been sampled. If the flows came any great distance, one might not expect volatiles in sufficient abundance to have created the 30 to 40% vesicularity of many of the olivine-normative mare basalts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Argon Ages and Geochemistry of Lunar Breccias 67016 and 67455
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74 (2010) 763–783 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Imbrium provenance for the Apollo 16 Descartes terrain: Argon ages and geochemistry of lunar breccias 67016 and 67455 M.D. Norman a,b,*, R.A. Duncan c, J.J. Huard c a Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia b Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston TX 77058, USA c College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Received 23 January 2009; accepted in revised form 16 September 2009; available online 21 October 2009 Abstract In order to improve our understanding of impact history and surface geology on the Moon, we obtained 40Ar–39Ar incre- mental heating age data and major + trace element compositions of anorthositic and melt breccia clasts from Apollo 16 feld- spathic fragmental breccias 67016 and 67455. These breccias represent the Descartes terrain, a regional unit often proposed to be ejecta from the nearby Nectaris basin. The goal of this work is to better constrain the emplacement age and provenance of the Descartes breccias. Four anorthositic clasts from 67016 yielded well-defined 40Ar–39Ar plateau ages ranging from 3842 ± 19 to 3875 ± 20 Ma. Replicate analyses of these clasts all agree within measurement error, with only slight evidence for either inheritance or youn- ger disturbance. In contrast, fragment-laden melt breccia clasts from 67016 yielded apparent plateau ages of 4.0–4.2 Ga with indications of even older material (to 4.5 Ga) in the high-T fractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Moon in Transition: Apollo 14, Kreep, and Evolved Lunar Rocks
    WORKSHOP ON MOON IN TRANSITION: APOLLO 14, KREEP, AND EVOLVED LUNAR ROCKS (NASA-CR-I"'-- N90-I_02o rRAN31TION: APJLLN l_p KRFEP, ANu _VOLVFD LUNAR ROCKS (Lunar and Pl_net3ry !nst.) I_7 p C_CL O3B Unclas G3/91 0253133 LPI Technical Report Number 89-03 UNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE 3303 NASA ROAD 1 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-4399 7 WORKSHOP ON MOON IN TRANSITION: APOLLO 14, KREEP, AND EVOLVED LUNAR ROCKS Edited by G. J. Taylor and P. H. Warren Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute NASA Johnson Space Center November 14-16, 1988 Houston, Texas Lunar and Planetary Institute 330 ?_NASA Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058-4399 LPI Technical Report Number 89-03 Compiled in 1989 by the LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by Universities Space Research Association under Contract NASW-4066 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this document may be copied without restraint for Library, abstract service, educational, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any portion requires the written permission of the authors as well as appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as: Taylor G. J. and Warren PI H., eds. (1989) Workshop on Moon in Transition: Apo{l_ 14 KREEP, and Evolved Lunar Rocks. [PI Tech. Rpt. 89-03. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 156 pp. Papers in this report may be cited as: Author A. A. (1989) Title of paper. In W_nkshop on Moon in Transition: Ap_llo 14, KREEP, and Evolved Lunar Rocks (G. J. Taylor and P. H. Warren, eds.), pp. xx-yy. LPI Tech. Rpt.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Geology of the Apollo 17 Landing Site
    NASA-CR-191637 \ WORKSHOP ON GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE (NASA-CR-191637) WORKSHOP ON N93-18786 GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING --THRU-- SITE (Lunar Science Inst.) 70 p N93-18817 Unclas G3/91 0141290 __ LPI Technical Report Number 92-09, Part 1 LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE 3600 BAY AREA BOULEVARD HOUSTON TX 77058-1113 LPI/TR--92-09, Part 1 WORKSHOP ON GEOLOGY OF THE APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE Edited by G. Ryder, H. H. Schmitt, and P. D. Spudis Held at Houston, Texas December 2-4, 1992 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Sample Team Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 92-09, Part 1 LPI/TR--92-09, Part 1 Compiledin 1992by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE TheInstituteis operatedby theUniversitySpaceResearchAssociationunderContractNo. NASW- 4574with theNationalAeronauticsandSpaceAdministration. Materialin this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or per- sonal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Ryder G., Schmitt H. H., and Spudis P. D., eds. (1992) Workshop on Geology of the Apollo 17 Landing Site. LPI Tech. Rpt. 92-09, Part 1, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 63 pp. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. Cover: Station 4 at Taurus-LiUrow, Apollo 17 landing site.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizons and OPPORTUNITIES in LUNAR SAMPLE Science
    HORIZOnS and OPPORTUNITIES in LUNAR SAMPLE SCIEnCE BY LUNAR AND PLANETARY SAMPLE TEAM (LAPST) MEMBERS Luwrence A. Taylor, Chairman; University of Tennessee Ran@ Korotev; Washington University David S. McKay; Johnson Space Center Graham Wdec Lunar & Planetary Institute Paul Spudis; U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstafl G. JeJrey TqyIoc University of New Mscico David Vaniman; Los Alamos National Lab Paul Warren; University of Califbmia Los Angeles LPI TECHNICAL REPORT 85-04 Compiled in 1985by the LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by Universities Space Research Association under Contract NASW-3389 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this document may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, educational or personal research purposes; however, republication of any portion requires the written permission of the authors as well as appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as: Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST) (1985) Horizons and Opportunities in Lunar Sample Science. LPI Tech. Rpt 85-04. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 44 pp. This report is distributedby LIBRARY/INFORMATION CENTER Lunar and Planetary Institute 3303 NASA Road 1 Houston, TX 77058-4399 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of postage and handling. Rontlspkce, Mission commander Llave Scott samples mare bosolt bedrock at the rim of Hadly Rille dur- ing the Apollo 15 mimion on August 3, 1971. On the boulder rests thegnoman (sun composs) and rock hammec thegouge in the boulder just below the mid-point of the rock hammer is the locotion of pxene (quartz-normative)basoll sample 155% (seen in sample bag in Scott's lep hand, at right).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Earth - W
    EARTH SYSTEM: HISTORY AND NATURAL VARIABILITY - Vol. I - Early Earth - W. Bleeker EARLY EARTH W. Bleeker Continental Geoscience Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada Keywords: early Earth, accretion, planetesimals, giant impacts, Moon, Hadean, Archaean, Proterozoic, late heavy bombardment, origin of life, mantle convection, mantle plumes, plate tectonics, geological time-scale, age dating Contents 1. Introduction 2. Early Earth: Concepts 2.1. Divisions of Geological Time 2.2. Definition of the“Early Earth” 2.3. Age Dating 3. Early Earth Evolution 3.1. Origin of the Universe and Formation of the Elements 3.2. Formation of the Solar System 3.3. Accretion, Differentiation, and Formation of the Earth–Moon System 3.4. Oldest Rocks and Minerals 3.5. The Close of the Hadean: the Late Heavy Bombardment 3.6. Earth’s Oldest Supracrustal Rocks and the Origin of Life 3.7. Settling into a Steady State: the Archean 4. Conclusions Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The “ early Earth” encompasses approximately the first gigayear (Ga, 109 y) in the evolution of our planet, from its initial formation in the young Solar System at about 4.55 Ga to sometimeUNESCO in the Archean eon at about 3.5– Ga. EOLSS This chapter describes the evolution of the early Earth and reviews the evidence that pertains to this interval from both planetary and geological science perspectives. Such a description, even in general terms, can only be given with some background knowledge of the origin and calibration of the geological timescale, modernSAMPLE age-dating techniques, the foCHAPTERSrmation of solar systems, and the accretion of terrestrial planets.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ 2012
    Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ 2012 Edited by: James A. Skinner, Jr. U. S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ Kenneth L. Tanaka U. S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ Michael S. Kelley NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC NOTE: This is a preliminary posting in advance of the final volume to be published as a NASA Conference Paper. Abstracts in this volume can be cited using the following format: Graupner, M. and Hansen, V.L., 2012, Structural and Geologic Mapping of Tellus Region, Venus, in Skinner, J.A., Jr. and others, eds., Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers, Flagstaff, AZ, June 18-20, 2012. Begin your report below this instruction. Press F1 or Help for more. Report of the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers Astrogeology Science Center U.S. Geological Survey Flagstaff, Arizona June 18 to 21, 2012 The construction of cartographic products to illustrate the surface characteristics of planetary bodies beyond our own has historically been met with particular challenges. These challenges can be overcome through innovative adaptation to burgeoning data sets and analytical technologies as well as a focused forum within which to present, critique, and discuss both technical approaches and scientific results. To assist, the Annual Meeting of Planetary Geologic Mappers (PGM) provides a unique forum for planetary scientists to address these challenges through the exchange of ideas and experiences relating to the creation, publication, and promotion of planetary geologic maps. PGM 2012 was convened by NASA’s Planetary Geology and Geophysics (PG&G) program Geologic Mapping Subcommittee (GEMS) Chair Jim Skinner (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrochronostratigraphic Polarity Time Scale (APTS) for the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic from Continental Sediments and Correlation with Standard Marine Stages
    Earth-Science Reviews 166 (2017) 153–180 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Invited review Astrochronostratigraphic polarity time scale (APTS) for the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic from continental sediments and correlation with standard marine stages Dennis V. Kent a,b,⁎,PaulE.Olsenb,GiovanniMuttonic a Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA b Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA c Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra ‘Ardito Desio’, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 34, I-20133 Milan, Italy article info abstract Article history: Paleomagnetic and cycle stratigraphic analyses of nearly 7000 m of section from continuous cores in the Newark Received 22 July 2016 basin and an overlapping 2500 meter-thick composite outcrop and core section in the nearby Hartford basin pro- Received in revised form 23 December 2016 vide an astrochronostratigraphic polarity time-scale (APTS) for practically the entire Late Triassic (Carnian, Accepted 23 December 2016 Norian and Rhaetian) and the Hettangian and early Sinemurian stages of the Early Jurassic (233 to 199 Ma in Available online 05 January 2017 toto). Aperiodic magnetic polarity reversals make a distinctive pattern of normal and reverse chrons for correla- tion, ideally paced by the periodic timing of orbital climate cycles, and anchored to million years ago (Ma) by high-precision U-Pb zircon dates from stratigraphically-constrained basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). Pinned by the CAMP dates, the Newark-Hartford APTS is calibrated by sixty-six McLaughlin cy- cles, each a reflection of climate forcing by the long astronomical eccentricity variation with the stable 405 kyr period, from 199.5 to 225.8 Ma and encompassing fifty-one magnetic polarity intervals, making it one of the lon- gest continuous astrochronostratigraphic polarity time-scales available in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal and Magmatic Evolution of the Moon Charles K
    Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry Vol. 60, pp. 365-518, 2006 4 Copyright © Mineralogical Society of America Thermal and Magmatic Evolution of the Moon Charles K. Shearer1, Paul C. Hess2, Mark A. Wieczorek3, Matt E. Pritchard4, E. Mark Parmentier2, Lars E. Borg1, John Longhi5, Linda T. Elkins-Tanton2, Clive R. Neal6, Irene Antonenko7, Robin M. Canup8, Alex N. Halliday9, Tim L. Grove10, Bradford H. Hager10, D-C. Lee11, Uwe Wiechert12 1Inst. of Meteorites, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A. 2Dept. of Geol. Sci., Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A. 3Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France 4Dept. of Earth & Atmospheric Sci., Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A. 5Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York, U.S.A. 6Dept. of Civil Eng. & Geol. Sci., Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A. 7University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 8Dept. of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. 9Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom 10Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, & Planetary Sci., MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 11Academica Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan 12Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule, Zurich, Switzerland Corresponding author e-mail: Charles K. Shearer <[email protected]> 1. INTRODUCTION As with all science, our continually developing concepts of lunar evolution are firmly tied to both new types of observations and the integration of these observations to the known pool of data. This process invigorates the intellectual foundation on which old models are tested and new concepts are built. Just as the application of new observational tools to lunar science in 1610 (Galileo’s telescope) and 1840 (photography) yielded breakthroughs concerning the true nature of the lunar surface, the computational and technological advances highlighted by the Apollo and post-Apollo missions and associated scientific investigations provided a new view of the thermal and magmatic evolution of the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe
    Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe Peter D. Ward Donald Brownlee COPERNICUS BOOKS ward_FM_i-xxviii 3/10/03 14:01 Page i Praise for Rare Earth . “ . brilliant and courageous . likely to cause a revolution in thinking.” —William J. Broad The New York Times “Science Times” “A pleasure for the rational reader . what good books are all about . ” —Associated Press “If Ward and Brownlee are right it could be time to reverse a process that has been going on since Copernicus.” —The Times (London) “Although simple life is probably abundant in the universe, Ward & Brownlee say, ‘complex life—animals and higher plants—is likely to be far more rare than is commonly assumed’.” —Scientific American, Editor’s Choice “ . a compelling argument [and] a wet blanket for E.T. enthusiasts . ” —Discover “Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee offer a powerful argument ....” —The Economist “[Rare Earth] has hit the world of astrobiologists like a killer asteroid ....” —Newsday “A very good book.” —Astronomy The notion that life existed anywhere in the universe besides Earth was once laughable in the scientific community. Over the past thirty years or so, the laugh- ter has died away . [Ward and Brownlee] argue that the recent trend in scien- tific thought has gone too far . As radio telescopes sweep the skies and earth- bound researchers strain to pick up anything that might be a signal from extraterrestrial beings, Rare Earth may offer an explanation for why we haven’t heard anything yet.” —CNN.com “ . a sobering and valuable perspective . ” —Science ward_FM_i-xxviii 3/10/03 14:01 Page ii “Movies and television give the (optimistic) impression that the cosmos is teeming with civilizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Source and Implications of Large Lunar Basin-Forming Objects
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI 1821.pdf SOURCE AND IMPLICATIONS OF LARGE LUNAR BASIN-FORMING OBJECTS. H. H. Schmitt 1, 1Department of Engineering Physics and Nuclear Engineering, University of Wisconsin, P.O. Box 90730, Albu- querque, NM 87199, [email protected]. Introduction: Major events in lunar history have ejecta blankets supports this conclusion. Preservation long been usefully put into a time-stratigraphic formu- of many of the characteristic features of the majority of lation [1]. On the other hand, the geological character large basins contrasts sharply with the vagueness or of major lunar features makes possible a descriptive absence of similar features related to the two very large formulation [2] that is remarkably consistent with the basins, Procellarum and South Pole-Aitken, that ap- time-stratigraphic system and may enable broader pear to have formed during the Cratered Highland multidisciplinary discussions of lunar and planetary Stage [6]. These two earlier large basins may indicate evolution. The following is an updated general outline that many more such early basins, possibly about 14 of such a perspective [3], the “Apollo Model 2000:” [7], formed during that stage only to be destroyed by Stage 1 : Beginning (Pre-Nectarian) – 4.57 the combined effects of later basin forming events and b.y. before present the overall, very high cratering rate during the Cratered Stage 2 : Magma Ocean (Pre-Nectarian) – 4.57 Highlands Stage. Although little direct evidence of - 4.2(?) b.y. such “cryptic basins” yet exists, and analyses of the Stage 3 : Cratered Highlands (Pre-Nectarian) – uniformity of anorthosite distribution in the highlands 4.4(?) - 4.2(?) b.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Writing About Twentieth Century Geology
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 26, 2021 Introduction: writing about twentieth century geology DAVID OLDROYD School of Science and Technology Studies, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia (e-mail: D. Oldroyd@unsw. edu. au) In a classic paper by the late Yale historian of So we may imagine the research front of science science, Derek De Solla Price (1965), based being a multitude of partly interconnected fields, mainly on the study of citations in a single scien- each growing like the shoot or branch of a plant. tific research field, it was shown how citations in The research progress occurs at the 'tip' of each a developing research area have a strong 'shoot', and its lower part consists largely of 'immediacy effect'3 Citation was found to be at 'dead wood' - though not wholly dead as a maximum for papers about two-and-a-half occasional reference back to classical papers years old, and the 'major work of a paper... [is] continues. Obviously, the 'shoots' are loosely finished after 10 years', as judged by citations. interconnected, as references may sometimes be There were, however, some 'classic' papers that from one research field to another. continue to be cited over long periods of time, I represent some of De Solla Price's findings and review papers specifically discussing the diagrammatically in Fig. 1; and in this diagram I earlier literature. There appears to be a need for have also indicated what may be the range of such review papers after the publication of interest of historians of science.
    [Show full text]