SHORT STORIES Volume I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PETAR STOJAKOVIC SHORT STORIES volume I BANJA LUKA, 2020 1 EXECUTION The Roman governor of Judea, the procurator and the hegemon Pontius Pilate, had a conversation with the High Priest Caiaphas about how the preparations for the upcoming Passover festival were taking place. Five cohorts of Roman soldiers had already been deployed on the main access routes, overseeing who, among the pilgrims, were entering the city. Two cohorts, headed from Caesarea, a port city in the north of the country, were only half a day riding from Jerusalem and would be deployed in the city itself as reinforcements to Roman soldiers who had already been there and who were in charge of keeping peace and arresting the perpetrators and Zealots. The Zealots often had used the Passover season to destroy the emperor's eagles and invite people to rebel against Rome. The procurator knew the history of Jerusalem well. He knew it was the capital of David's empire even ten centuries ago. David's successor, his younger son Solomon, expanded and adorned the city. He also erected defense walls, imperial palace and magnificent temple. It was the temple of God in which the Ark of the Covenant was kept. During great holidays, people prayed there. The incense and fruits of the harvest were burned, and sacrifices were offered on the altar to God. There were many people employed in the service and maintenance of the Temple. At the time of Passover, harvest and gathering, pilgrims from everywhere were arriving at Jerusalem for worship while singing psalms. It is then said that all roads lead to Jerusalem, not to Rome. At the time of the Paschal festival commemorating the exodus of the Jews from the Egyptian slavery, the population of the city often increased as many as tenfold, because for most of the common people it was the center of all Jews, not only of those from Judea, but also of those from Edom, in the South, and those from Samaria and Galilee, a little further to the North of Jerusalem. This First Temple, erected by Solomon, was destroyed by the Babylonian ruler Nabu-kudurri-usur six centuries later, when the Jews fall again into slavery this time it was Babylonian. Having been liberated from the Babylonian slavery and returning to Jerusalem, which the Jews celebrate as their second exodus, they erected the Second Temple. The procurator and hegemon Pontius Pilate also knew that the Second Temple and the city walls were destroyed by the Roman legions under the command of General Pompey which conquered the Jewish provinces of Samaria and Galilee in the North to Judea and Edom in the South. The construction of the Third Temple began during the time of the King of Herod the Great, appointed by the Romans, and the works were still ongoing, but religious ceremonies did not stop for a single day. The procurator was mostly concerned about some groups of Zealots that might mix with not only thousands of pilgrims who arrived every day but also with numerous builders and carpenters working on the reconstruction of the city walls. The stream of pilgrims were pouring in the city daily, and among them there were charlatans, astrologers, magicians, stars, prophets, thieves, rogues, robbers and murderers. If rebels and villains were infiltrated among them, then it would be difficult to detect them. Pilate had already received news from his informants, and also from the High Priest Caiaphas that half a million people could come to celebrate the Passover in the city this year, which was almost ten times the number of people who lived there 2 permanently. Other cities, Caesarea, Khan, Nazareth, Jericho, Hebron, and Qumran did not have much fewer inhabitants during the year than Jerusalem, but during the Passover, Jerusalem became several times bigger than them, because only one God's temple is inhabited by God, and it is this one in Jerusalem. There is no place like this and it cannot be found anywhere else, because the Ark of the Covenant is kept in the Temple of Jerusalem. Therefore, the stream of the pilgrims began pouring like a spring from the mountains to the city even a month before the beginning of the Paschal festival. Jerusalem then shadowed all other cities of the eastern provinces of the Roman Empire, even Antioch in Syria, Corinth in Greece, Alexandria in Egypt, and Tars in Cilicia. And Ephesus, the capital of the farthest Roman province of Asia, famous for its 127-pillar temple, dedicated to the goddess of fertility and abundance, Artemis, was forgotten at that time of the year. The excitement in Jerusalem was growing, becoming greater and greater as each day of spring in the month Nisan passed approaching the Passover festival. It could not be said that the procurator worried much, but he was certainly uncomfortable. He thought that something could get out of control and turn into a rebel or, even worse, that the Zealots might start the riots, and then use them for the general rebellion of people against Rome. If such a report was sent to Rome, the Emperor Tiberius would certainly not invite him to his birthday celebration, as he had done so far. Only he, the governor of Judea, among all the eastern provincial governors, was in the emperor’s lodge during the battle of gladiators in the arena last year. The emperor rewarded him knowing how difficult it was for him to keep control of the troubled province, to stifle rebellions and to enforce Roman laws. The entertainments and feasts that Tiberius organised in the arena, at the stadium, the circus and the amphitheater were still vivid in his memories. Pilate remembered well that Tiberius entrusted food preparation for his last year birthday party, not only to public chefs, but also to the hosts of respectable houses were involved. The gladiators, who had already become famous and who were said to be brave fighters, were dragged out of the arena and kept for the events. Pilate recalled how Tiberius liked to repeat the saying that Guy Julius Caesar uttered persecuting his opponent General Pompey. When Pompey escaped from Rome in Brindisi, leaving his army at the mercy of Caesar's legions, he said: "Now I am attacking the army without a leader, and then I will turn into a leader without an army." What now calmed the hegemon down was that a whole legion was deployed in the city and around it on time. On the accesses to the main gate of the city that admitted columns of pilgrims from the direction of Hebron, Jericho, Kumran, Vitania and other cities that once were parts of the mighty David's empire, there was one cohort. The guards and on-callers were placed on small roads and forest paths, so the city was surrounded. In the event of a rebellion, no one would be able to withdraw unnoticed, even under the protection of the night, which the organisers of rebellions and uprisings had often done before. Ten days ago, the procurator learned that, three months before, the Emperor of Tiberias had ordered three legions from Rome to move to the remote eastern provinces of the Empire. The hegemon was surprised that nothing he had not been informed from Rome, as was always the case. It had been customary until then that the town councilors of the eastern provinces were informed on time about greater movements of the Roman legions in that direction. He anxiously thought that the Emperor Tiberius could dismiss him because the legate who commanded the legion of Jerusalem had not yet visited him, although he had already been to Rome twice, demanding from the 3 Emaror at least five cohorts, if not the whole legion, to keep peace in Judea during the Passover. The procurator still hoped that both legions would arrive in Judah on time and be deployed in Jerusalem and Caesarea as an additional reinforcement, although he did not know anything reliably about this. By this act, the Emperor would again demonstrate great efforts of the governor of Judea, and that it was not easy for him. It would also eliminate the last doubts that arose after unconvincing stories that the emperor intended to soon dismiss several Roman rulers in the eastern provinces of the empire because of the failure to apply Roman laws and the mild punishment for the rebels who had demolished imperial eagles and disobeyed Roman laws. It had been more than half a century since the Roman commander of Pompey conquered Judea and Jerusalem, and later other Jewish provinces. After many rebellions supressed in blood, the Romans put Herod the Great in power, their vassal, loyal to Rome. Herod, whom the Jews despised, because he was appointed by the Romans, and for whom they said was not a Jew, in order to get the affection of the people, began great works, and in just twenty years, the city experienced great changes. Many theaters, amphitheaters and even a hippodrome had been built like those in Greece and Rome. Herod also began building the Third Temple according to the plan and on the foundations of the First, Solomon's Temple. The Third Temple was built of white stone and coated with gold panels, and the whole plateau where the temple was located was covered with colorful stone slabs making mosaics that could be seen only on the squares of the largest cities of the Empire. But most Jews continued to despise Herod because of his non- Jewish origin. The Pharisees called him: the slave from Edom. But he was more persistent and decisive than ever to gain the affection of people, and therefore married Mariamne from the Hasmonean dynasty, restored the temple, developed foreign trade by building a harbor in Caesarea, kept order in the kingdom, and reduced taxes.
Recommended publications
  • Qualitative Changes in Ethno-Linguistic Status : a Case Study of the Sorbs in Germany

    Qualitative Changes in Ethno-Linguistic Status : a Case Study of the Sorbs in Germany

    Qualitative Changes in Ethno-linguistic Status: A Case Study of the Sorbs in Germany by Ted Cicholi RN (Psych.), MA. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science School of Government 22 September 2004 Disclaimer Although every effort has been taken to ensure that all Hyperlinks to the Internet Web sites cited in this dissertation are correct at the time of writing, no responsibility can be taken for any changes to these URL addresses. This may change the format as being either underlined, or without underlining. Due to the fickle nature of the Internet at times, some addresses may not be found after the initial publication of an article. For instance, some confusion may arise when an article address changes from "front page", such as in newspaper sites, to an archive listing. This dissertation has employed the Australian English version of spelling but, where other works have been cited, the original spelling has been maintained. It should be borne in mind that there are a number of peculiarities found in United States English and Australian English, particular in the spelling of a number of words. Interestingly, not all errors or irregularities are corrected by software such as Word 'Spelling and Grammar Check' programme. Finally, it was not possible to insert all the accents found in other languages and some formatting irregularities were beyond the control of the author. Declaration This dissertation does not contain any material which has been accepted for the award of any other higher degree or graduate diploma in any tertiary institution.
  • 00 TZ Konstantin Nulte:Layout 1.Qxd

    00 TZ Konstantin Nulte:Layout 1.Qxd

    Tibor Živković DE CONVERSIONE CROATORUM ET SERBORUM A Lost Source INSTITUTE OF HISTORY Monographs Volume 62 TIBOR ŽIVKOVIĆ DE CONVERSIONE CROATORUM ET SERBORUM A Lost Source Editor-in-chief Srđan Rudić, Ph.D. Director of the Institute of History Belgrade 2012 Consulting editors: Academician Jovanka Kalić Prof. Dr. Vlada Stanković This book has been published with the financial support of THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (project No III47025) CONTENTS PREFACE 9 ABBREVIATIONS 13 INTRODUCTORY NOTE The Workshop of Constantine Porphyrogenitus 19 THE STORY OF THE CROATS 43 THE STORY OF DALMATIA 91 THE STORY OF THE SERBS 149 THE DISPLACED SECTIONS OF CONSTANTINE’S PRIMARY SOURCE ON THE CROATS AND THE SERBS 181 CONCLUSIONS 197 SOURCES 225 REFERENCES 229 INDEXES 241 Nec plus ultra To the memories of the finest gentleman Božidar Ferjančić (1929 – 1998) PREFACE This book is the result of 20 years of research on the so-called Slavic chapters of Constantine Pophyrogenitus’ De administrando imperio, the last stage of which took place in Athens 2009/2010, where I was completing my postdoctoral research on the supposed main source Constantine Porhyrogenitus had used for the earliest history of the Croats and the Serbs. The research took place at the Centre for Byzantine Research in Athens (IVE) with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Serbian Government and the Serbian Orthodox Metropoly of Montenegro. The first preliminary results on the supposed, now lost source of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, were published in an article in Byzantina Symmeikta (2010) and the results I presented at that time allowed me to try to make a more profound analysis of that source and eventually to reveal the most significant number of its fragments preserved in the Croat and Serb chapters of De administrando imperio – its original purpose – as well as the possible background of its composition.
  • GENS VLACHORUM in HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs)

    GENS VLACHORUM in HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs)

    ПЕТАР Б. БОГУНОВИЋ УДК 94(497.11) Нови Сад Оригиналан научни рад Република Србија Примљен: 21.01.2018 Одобрен: 23.02.2018 Страна: 577-600 GENS VLACHORUM IN HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs) Part 1 Summary: This article deals with the issue of the term Vlach, that is, its genesis, dis- persion through history and geographical distribution. Also, the article tries to throw a little more light on this notion, through a multidisciplinary view on the part of the population that has been named Vlachs in the past or present. The goal is to create an image of what they really are, and what they have never been, through a specific chronological historical overview of data related to the Vlachs. Thus, it allows the reader to understand, through the facts presented here, the misconceptions that are related to this term in the historiographic literature. Key words: Vlachs, Morlachs, Serbs, Slavs, Wallachia, Moldavia, Romanian Orthodox Church The terms »Vlach«1, or later, »Morlach«2, does not represent the nationality, that is, they have never represented it throughout the history, because both of this terms exclusively refer to the members of Serbian nation, in the Serbian ethnic area. –––––––––––– [email protected] 1 Serbian (Cyrillic script): влах. »Now in answer to all these frivolous assertions, it is sufficient to observe, that our Morlacchi are called Vlassi, that is, noble or potent, for the same reason that the body of the nation is called Slavi, which means glorious; that the word Vlah has nothing
  • Duklja, the Normans of Sicily and Byzantium in the 11Th and 12Th Century 21

    Duklja, the Normans of Sicily and Byzantium in the 11Th and 12Th Century 21

    Duklja, the Normans of Sicily and Byzantium in the 11th and 12th centurY 21 Georgi DIMOV* DUKLJA, THE NORMANS OF SICILY AND BYZANTIUM IN THE 11th AND 12th CENTURY Abstract: The relations between Imperial ally Duklja and Byzantium date back to the mid-1040 s when Michael (Mihailo) son of Vojislav gradually emerged as the sole ruler of this principality over his four brothers (1043–1046). Michael ruled Duklja from 1046 until 1081, when we find the last mentioning of him in the primary sources. In the early winter of 1072 he sent an army under his son Constan- tine Bodin to support a Bulgarian rebellion (in the vicinity of Skopje), which was timed to take advantage after the defeat at Matzikert the year before. Another point that complicat- ed the Byzantino-Slavic relations was Michael’s wish to create his own church that would have been independent from the Greek-Orthodox archbishops of Dyrrachium and Ohrid. Later Michael received his crown as papal vassal in an attempt to move further away from the Byzantine sphere of influence (1077). He also entered diplomatic relations with the western powers by marrying his son Bodin, to the daughter of the Norman governor of Bari. All this political moves make us think that Michael of Duklja would have hoped that the Pope would act in his favor and deter any expansionist attempts by the Normans against his principality, if we bear in mind Amicus II’s cam- paign against Dalmatia only three years before. The Byzantine victory over the Bulgarians was a critical development in Balkan history.
  • Working Papers WP 2013-03 Centre for German and European Studies

    Working Papers WP 2013-03 Centre for German and European Studies

    Working Papers WP 2013-03 Centre for German and European Studies (CGES) Marina Nosacheva Comparative research of national identity preservation using the examples of Sorbs, North Frisians and Bretons in Germany and France. WP 2013-03 2013 № 3 Bielefeld / St. Petersburg Working Papers WP 2013-03 Centre for German and European Studies Bielefeld University St. Petersburg State University Centre for German and European Studies (CGES) CGES Working Papers series includes publication of materials prepared within different activities of the Center for German and European Studies both in St. Petersburg and in Germany: The CGES supports educational programs, research and scientific dialogues. In accordance with the CGES mission, the Working Papers are dedicated to the interdisciplinary studies of different aspects of German and European societies. The paper is written on the basis of the MA Thesis defended in the MA SES in June 2013 supervised by Dr. Gregory Pershin. The author’s internship at the Center for Research on Breton and Celtic, Brest, France and summer exchange semester at the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg made an invaluable contribution to the following research project. The publication of the MA thesis in the CGES Working Paper series was recommended by the Examination Committee as one of the best papers out of five MA theses defended by the students of the MA Programme ‘’Studies in European Societies’’ at St. Petersburg State University in June 2013. Marina Nosacheva graduated from the Faculty of Sociology of St. Petersburg State University in 2013 (Major in European societies). Her academic interests include national minority, minority language, identity theories, and bilingual education.
  • Memory and Authority in the Ninth-Century Dalmatian Duchy

    Memory and Authority in the Ninth-Century Dalmatian Duchy

    Marino Kumir MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Reader CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 I, the undersigned, Marino Kumir, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of the work of others, and no part of the thesis infringes on any person’s or institution’s copyright.
  • According to Antique Historians and the Paschal Chronicle the Scythian Empire Or the Federation of Nations Was Founded Around 3660 BC

    According to Antique Historians and the Paschal Chronicle the Scythian Empire Or the Federation of Nations Was Founded Around 3660 BC

    Summary DOCLEA AND PRAEVALITANA According to antique historians and the Paschal Chronicle the Scythian Empire or the federation of nations was founded around 3660 BC. The Scythians started to colonize the Balkans around 1800 BC and this mission ended around 1500 BC. Around 1000 BC the Kimmerian Scythians attacked Italy where they formeded their territories. The oldest Scythian Balkan state was Thracia which was created by the Pedases people around 3500 BC, and the Egyptian sources are also mentioning it as an enemy state around 2000 BC. Around 1600 BC a powerful cen- tral Balkan state was created and its name was Dar- dania. The Egyptian sources of 1452 BC from the period of the reign of Amenophis II and of 1240 from the period of the reign of Ramses II are men- tioning the names of Scythian Balkan nations: the Moesi, the Dardanians, the Thracian Pedases, and the Odrysae people. The Scythian Docleatae belonged to the Parthian Scythians; part of them descended to the Balkans in the second half of the second millennium BC. 649 Vojislav D. Nikčević: DOCLEA AND PRAEVALITANA They created two cities around 1040 BC: Doclea and Scodra. On the territory of today’s Montenegro the Docleatae founded three cities: Medun, Risinium (Risan) and Budua (Budva). In VII and VI century BC the powerful Kingdom of Pontus of the Aorses created its federal unit in the middle Dalmatia and the Scythian Balkan federation known as the Kingdom of the Danube Scythians ruled by the Scytho-Sarmatian Autariatae. This state-alliance included the Kingdom of Pannonia with its capital Sirmium, the alliance con- sisted of the Veneti and the Liburnians, the Kingdom of Aorses, kingdoms of Dardania and Moesia and the agreed province of two kingdoms – Dacia with Trivalia (Praevaliana, future Praevalitana) as well as Scythia Minor.
  • Integration of East German Resettlers Into the Cultures and Societies of the GDR

    Integration of East German Resettlers Into the Cultures and Societies of the GDR

    Integration of East German Resettlers into the Cultures and Societies of the GDR Doctoral Thesis of Aaron M.P. Jacobson Student Number 59047878 University College London Degree: Ph.D. in History 1 DECLARATION I, Aaron M.P. Jacobson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 ABSTRACT A controversy exists in the historiography of ethnic German post-WWII refugees and expellees who lived in the German Democratic Republic. This question is namely: to what extent were these refugees and expellees from various countries with differing cultural, religious, social and economic backgrounds integrated into GDR society? Were they absorbed by the native cultures of the GDR? Was an amalgamation of both native and expellee cultures created? Or did the expellees keep themselves isolated and separate from GDR society? The historiography regarding this controversy most commonly uses Soviet and SED governmental records from 1945-53. The limitation of this approach by historians is that it has told the refugee and expellee narrative from government officials’ perspectives rather than those of the Resettlers themselves. In 1953 the SED regime stopped public record keeping concerning the Resettlers declaring their integration into GDR society as complete. After eight years in the GDR did the Resettlers feel that they were an integrated part of society? In an attempt to ascertain how Resettlers perceived their own pasts in the GDR and the level of integration that occurred, 230 refugees and expellees were interviewed throughout the former GDR between 2008-09.
  • Appendix Ad Historiam Serborum Et Slavorum

    Appendix Ad Historiam Serborum Et Slavorum

    ПЕТАР Б. БОГУНОВИЋ УДК 141.319.8:165.9(407.1) Нови Сад Прегледни рад Република Србија Примљен: 25.04.2019 Одобрен: 20.05.2019 Страна: 159-188 APPENDIX AD HISTORIAM SERBORUM ET SLAVORUM [A Contribution to the History of the Serbs and Slavs] Summary: This article views the attitudes of the early past of Serbs and Slavs pre- sented by the scientists of various profiles. Therefore, it represents a short glance on the past of Eurasia (from the end of the Old Age to the early Middle Ages) through the prism of thin- king of many historians, archeologists, linguists and DNA genealogists. Without questioning the accuracy of each attitude or data presented in their works (as both contemporary and early scientists have errors), this article merely points to the possibility of an alternative view to the past, or draw attention to new facts, which often destroy the foundations of the official historiography (initially when we talk about Serbian and Slavic histories). It is clear that the selection of here mentioned views is not accidental and strictly related to what we can define as a specific correlation with everything that the molecular archaeology presented us or, even better to say, proved during recent years with the molecular history formed on its foundations. Crossing the results of independent works and the conclusions of scientists from previous centuries with the results of genetic research leads us to some other conclusi- ons on many questions from the past of the Serbs and Slavs. The goal of this article is to lift the veil, or at least clarify a little bit, what is (unfortunately) still obscured in the history of Eurasia.
  • The First Coronation Churches of Medieval Serbia

    The First Coronation Churches of Medieval Serbia

    Jovanka Kalić* https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1748007K UDC 94(497.11-89)"10/12" Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Original scholarly work Belgrade http://www.balcanica.rs The First Coronation Churches of Medieval Serbia Abstract: The medieval ceremony of coronation as a rule took place in the most important church of a realm. The sites of the coronation of Serbian rulers before the establishment of the Žiča monastery church as the coronation church of Serbian kings in the first half of the thirteenth century have not been reliably identified so far. Based on the surviving me- dieval sources and the archaeological record, this paper provides background information about the titles of Serbian rulers prior to the creation of the Nemanjić state, and proposes that Stefan, son of the founder of the Nemanjić dynasty, was crowned king (1217) in the church of St Peter in Ras. Keywords: Serbia, corona regni, Stefan the First-Crowned, Sava of Serbia, Žiča monastery oronation sites of medieval monarchs hold an important place in the “cul- Ctural geography” of European nations. They are a major subject of every history because the rite of coronation sums up previous history and, as a rule, announces the one that lies ahead. The rite encompasses the totality of the cir- cumstances of a given community, political as well as religious, at that particular moment. In the context of such interrelatedness of phenomena, the coronation site carries multiple meanings. There is, of course, nothing random about it in a society based on the Christian view of the world and the monarch’s supreme au- thority.
  • Appendix for “The Feudal Revolution and Europe's Rise: Political

    Appendix for “The Feudal Revolution and Europe's Rise: Political

    Appendix for “The Feudal Revolution and Europe’s Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE” August 1, 2012 1 Feudalism and Political Stability To formalize the intuition presented in Section 3.3 using a simple framework, suppose that a perfectly myopic, risk-neutral sovereign imperfectly controls a polity that creates output of size one each period. Denote by γ the amount of land controlled by the military regardless of the actions of the sovereign (this can be interpreted as the percentage of the entire polity controlled by the military). Suppose that there are N perfectly myopic, risk-neutral members of the military (where N is sufficiently large) and that γ is evenly distributed between the members of this class. We consider the parameter value γ exogenously given. A value of γ = 0 corresponds to a perfectly absolutist sovereign (who uses mamluks or mercenaries to staff his military) whereas higher values of γ denote more feudal arrangements. Note that our assumption of perfectly myopic agents allows us to abstract from the potentially important issue of how the sovereign compensates the military (i.e., iqta’ rents versus land grants).1 In addition, we abstract from other important issues in order to focus on the sovereign’s desire to prevent a successful revolt. We do so in order to highlight one mechanism that we believe contributes to the observed increase in ruler duration. The order of play in the game is as follows: after observing γ the sovereign moves first and decides whether to keep the entire amount of output he controls to himself or whether to divide it equally between himself and the military.
  • Between Germany, Poland and Szlonzokian Nationalism

    Between Germany, Poland and Szlonzokian Nationalism

    EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION EUI Working Paper HEC No. 2003/1 The Szlonzoks and their Language: Between Germany, Poland and Szlonzokian Nationalism TOMASZ KAMUSELLA BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO (FI) All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author(s). © 2003 Tomasz Kamusella Printed in Italy in December 2003 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico (FI) Italy ________Tomasz Kamusella________ The Szlonzoks1 and Their Language: Between Germany, Poland and Szlonzokian Nationalism Tomasz Kamusella Jean Monnet Fellow, Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute, Florence, Italy & Opole University, Opole, Poland Please send any comments at my home address: Pikna 3/2 47-220 Kdzierzyn-Koïle Poland [email protected] 1 This word is spelt in accordance with the rules of the Polish orthography and, thus, should be pronounced as /shlohnzohks/. 1 ________Tomasz Kamusella________ Abstract This article analyzes the emergence of the Szlonzokian ethnic group or proto- nation in the context of the use of language as an instrument of nationalism in Central Europe. When language was legislated into the statistical measure of nationality in the second half of the nineteenth century, Berlin pressured the Slavophone Catholic peasant-cum-worker population of Upper Silesia to become ‘proper Germans’, this is, German-speaking and Protestant. To the German ennationalizing2 pressure the Polish equivalent was added after the division of Upper Silesia between Poland and Germany in 1922. The borders and ennationalizing policies changed in 1939 when the entire region was reincorporated into wartime Germany, and, again, in 1945 following the incorporation of Upper Silesia into postwar Poland.