Downloaded on 2017-02-12T14:24:20Z the Impact of Conifer Plantation Forestry on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded on 2017-02-12T14:24:20Z the Impact of Conifer Plantation Forestry on The Title The impact of conifer plantation forestry on the ecology of peatland lakes Author(s) Drinan, Thomas J. Publication date 2012-09 Original citation Drinan, T. J. 2012. The impact of conifer plantation forestry on the ecology of peatland lakes. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Link to publisher's http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969712014313 version http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-012-1230-x http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712004211 Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2012, Thomas J. Drinan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/951 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T14:24:20Z The impact of conifer plantation forestry on the ecology of peatland lakes Thomas J. Drinan A thesis submitted to the National University of Ireland, Cork, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Head of School: Prof. John O’Halloran Research Supervisors: Dr Simon S. C. Harrison Prof. John O’Halloran School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and Food Science, University College Cork September 2012 Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Signed ……………..……………… Date …………………………….. i Abstract Blanket bog lakes are a characteristic feature of blanket bog habitats and harbour many rare and threatened invertebrate species. Despite their potential conservation value, however, very little is known about their physico-chemical or biological characteristics in western Europe, and their reference conditions are still unknown in Ireland. Furthermore, they are under considerable threat in Ireland from a number of sources, particularly afforestation of their catchments by exotic conifers. Plantation forestry can potentially lead to the increased input of substances including hydrogen ions (H+), plants nutrients, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), heavy metals and sediment. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of conifer plantation forestry on the hydrochemistry and ecology of blanket bog lakes in western Ireland. Lake hydrochemistry, littoral Chydoridae (Cladocera) and littoral macroinvertebrate communities were compared among replicate lakes selected from three distinct catchment land use categories: i) unplanted blanket bog only present in the catchment, ii) mature (closed-canopy) conifer plantation forests only present in the catchment and iii) catchments containing mature conifer plantation forests with recently clearfelled areas. All three catchment land uses were replicated across two geologies: sandstone and granite. Lakes with afforested catchments across both geologies had elevated concentrations of phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), total dissolved organic carbon (TDOC), aluminium (Al) and iron (Fe), with the highest concentrations of each parameter recorded from lakes with catchment clearfelling. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were also significantly reduced in the afforested lakes, particularly the clearfell lakes. ii This change in lake hydrochemistry was associated with profound changes in lake invertebrate communities. Within the chydorid communities, the dominance of Alonopsis elongata in the unplanted blanket bog lakes shifted to dominance by the smaller bodied Chydorus sphaericus, along with Alonella nana, Alonella excisa and Alonella exigua, in the plantation forestry-affected lakes, consistent with a shift in lake trophy. Similarly, there was marked changes in the macroinvertebrate communities, especially for the Coleoptera and Heteroptera assemblages which revealed increased taxon richness and abundance in the nutrient-enriched lakes. In terms of conservation status, despite having the greatest species-quality scores (SQS) and species richness, three of the four International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red-listed species of Coleoptera and Odonata recorded during the study were absent from lakes subject to catchment clearfelling. The relative strengths of bottom-up (forestry-mediated nutrient enrichment) and top-down (fish) forces in structuring littoral macroinvertebrate communities was investigated in a separate study. Nutrient enrichment was shown to be the dominant force acting on communities, with fish having a lesser influence. These results confirmed that plantation forestry poses the single greatest threat to the conservation status of blanket bog lakes in western Ireland. The findings of this study have major implications for the management of afforested peatlands. Further research is required on blanket bog lakes to prevent any further plantation forestry-mediated habitat deterioration of this rare and protected habitat. iii Table of contents Page Declaration ................................................................................................................... i Abstract ....................................................................................................................... ii Table of contents ....................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1 – General Introduction ............................................................................ 1 1.1. Irish peatland ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Blanket bog water bodies .................................................................................. 3 1.3. Conifer plantation forestry in Ireland ................................................................ 4 1.4. Effects of plantation forestry on the hydrochemistry of surface waters ............ 5 1.5. Ecological impacts of plantation forestry on surface waters ............................. 6 1.6. Global stressors of lake habitat quality ............................................................. 7 1.7. Study objectives ................................................................................................ 8 1.8. References ....................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2 – Variation in the physico-chemical and biological characteristics between upland and lowland (Atlantic) blanket bog lakes in western Ireland .. 24 2.1. Summary ......................................................................................................... 25 2.2. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 27 2.3. Materials and methods ..................................................................................... 30 2.3.1. Study sites ................................................................................................. 30 2.3.2. Water chemistry sampling and analysis.................................................... 34 2.3.3. Chydoridae sampling ................................................................................ 36 2.3.4. Littoral macroinvertebrate sampling ......................................................... 36 2.3.5. Macrophyte surveys .................................................................................. 37 2.3.6. Statistical analyses .................................................................................... 38 iv 2.4. Results ............................................................................................................. 40 2.4.1. Physico-chemical characteristics .............................................................. 40 2.4.2. Chydoridae communities .......................................................................... 47 2.4.3. Littoral macroinvertebrate communities ................................................... 55 2.4.4. Macrophyte communities ......................................................................... 61 2.4.5. Species rarity and uncommon species ...................................................... 63 2.5. Discussion ....................................................................................................... 64 2.6. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 71 2.7. References ....................................................................................................... 72 Chapter 3 – The impact of catchment conifer plantation forestry on the hydrochemistry of peatland lakes ........................................................................... 85 3.1. Summary ......................................................................................................... 86 3.2. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 87 3.3. Materials and methods ..................................................................................... 91 3.3.1. Site description ......................................................................................... 91 3.3.1.1. Study lakes ........................................................................................ 91 3.3.1.2. Clearfell site – Glennamong.............................................................. 92 3.3.2. Water chemistry sampling .......................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites
    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Catalogue of Enicocephalomorpha, Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, and Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Turkey, with New Records
    Zootaxa 2856: 1–84 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2856 Annotated catalogue of Enicocephalomorpha, Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, and Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Turkey, with new records MERAL FENT1, PETR KMENT2, BELGİN ÇAMUR-ELİPEK1 & TİMUR KIRGIZ1 1Trakya University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 22030 Edirne, Turkey. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum, Kunratice 1, CZ-148 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by C. Schaefer: 25 Nov. 2010; published: 29 Apr. 2011 MERAL FENT, PETR KMENT, BELGİN ÇAMUR-ELİPEK & TİMUR KIRGIZ Annotated catalogue of Enicocephalomorpha, Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, and Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Turkey, with new records (Zootaxa 2856) 84 pp.; 30 cm. 29 April 2011 ISBN 978-1-86977-681-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-682-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2011 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2011 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 2856 © 2011 Magnolia Press FENT ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • Seznam Vodních Druhů Ploštic
    SEZNAM VODNÍCH DRUH Ů PLOŠTIC (HETEROPTERA: NEPOMORPHA, GERROMORPHA) ČR PETR KMENT NEPOMORPHA Popov, 1968 NEPOIDEA Latreille, 1802 NEPIDAE Latreille, 1802 Nepinae Latreille, 1802 Nepini Latreille, 1802 Nepa cinerea Linnaeus, 1758 BM Ranatrinae Douglas & Scott, 1865 Ranatrini Douglas & Scott, 1865 Ranatra (Ranatra) linearis (Linnaeus, 1758) BM CORIXOIDEA Leach, 1815 CORIXIDAE Leach, 1815 Micronectinae Jaczewski, 1924 [Micronecta (Dichaetonecta) pusilla (Horváth, 1895)] Micronceta (Dichaetonecta) scholtzi (Fieber, 1860) BM Micronecta (Micronecta) griseola Horváth, 1899 BM Micronecta (Micronecta) minutissima (Linnaeus, 1758) BM Micronecta (Micronecta) poweri poweri (Douglas & Scott, 1869) BM Cymatiainae Walton, 1940 Cymatia bonsdorffii (C. R. Sahlberg, 1819) BM Cymatia coleoptrata (Fabricius, 1777) BM Cymatia rogenhoferi (Fieber, 1864) BM Corixinae Leach, 1815 Glaenocorisini Hungerford, 1948 Glaenocorisa propinqua (Fieber, 1860) BM Corixini Leach, 1815 Arctocorisa carinata carinata (C. R. Sahlberg, 1819) B Arctocorisa germari (Fieber, 1848) B Callicorixa praeusta praeusta (Fieber, 1848) BM Corixa affinis Leach, 1817 M Corixa dentipes Thomson, 1869 BM Corixa punctata (Illiger, 1807) BM Hesperocorixa castanea (Thomson, 1869) B Hesperocorixa linnaei (Fieber, 1848) BM Hesperocorixa moesta (Fieber, 1848) B Hesperocorixa sahlbergi (Fieber, 1848) BM Paracorixa concinna concinna (Fieber, 1848) BM Sigara (Halicorixa) stagnalis stagnalis (Leach, 1817) ?B Sigara (Microsigara) hellensii (C. R. Sahlberg, 1819) BM Sigara (Pseudovermicorixa) nigrolineata
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding
    Syst. Biol. 61(5):851–869, 2012 c The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society of Systematic Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/sys037 Advance Access publication on March 7, 2012 The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding 1,2,3 4 2,3 2,3 JOHANNES BERGSTEN ∗,DAVID T. BILTON ,TOMOCHIKA FUJISAWA ,MIRANDA ELLIOTT , MICHAEL T. MONAGHAN5,MICHAEL BALKE6,LARS HENDRICH6,JOJA GEIJER7,JAN HERRMANN7, GARTH N. FOSTER8,IGNACIO RIBERA9,ANDERS N. NILSSON10,TIMOTHY G. BARRACLOUGH3, AND ALFRIED P. VOGLER2,3 1Department of Entomology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; 2Entomology Department, Natural History Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article-abstract/61/5/851/1736372 by guest on 20 November 2018 Museum, Cromwell road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 3Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK; 4Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK; 5Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Mueggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany; 6Zoologische Staatssammlung M¨unchen, M¨unchhausenstrasse21, 81247 M¨unchen,Germany;
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Hemiptera of Great Britain: the Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Bugs
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR188 A review of the Hemiptera of Great Britain: The Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Bugs Dipsocoromorpha, Gerromorpha, Leptopodomorpha & Nepomorpha Species Status No.24 First published 20 November 2015 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to the survival of a species. The recognised international approach to undertaking this is by assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat categories. This report was commissioned to update the national status of aquatic and semi-aquatic bugs using IUCN methodology for assessing threat. It covers all species of aquatic and semi-aquatic bugs (Heteroptera) in Great Britain, identifying those that are rare and/or under threat as well as non-threatened and non-native species. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - Jon Webb, [email protected] Contractor - A.A. Cook (author) Keywords - invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, Heteroptera, aquatic bugs, shore bugs, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0845 600 3078 or e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow's Water Beetles
    The Glasgow Naturalist (online 2012) Volume 25, Part 4. Urban biodiversity: Successes and Challenges Urban Biodiversity: Successes and Challenges: Glasgow’s water beetles Garth N. Foster The Aquatic Coleoptera Conservation Trust, 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION the list of 101 species recorded from 1990 onwards. Water beetles are a well-recorded freshwater group in However several water beetles specialising in pond Britain despite lacking the charisma of dragonflies and habitats have become established in the Glasgow area the angling interest of mayflies and the like. The over a similar period. conference on urban biodiversity held by the Glasgow Natural History Society in October 2010 provided the The following examples of some species in decline and stimulus to assess their status in the area. some on the increase serve to illustrate the range of habitats that can be occupied. Water beetles cannot be precisely excised from beetles Noterus clavicornis (De Geer) This species is usually as a whole. Coleoptera are divided into two major referred to as “The Large Noterus” because the name groups, the Adephaga and the Polyphaga. Within the clavicornis has also been applied to the smaller, Adephaga the name “Hydradephaga” has been coined flightless N. crassicornis (Müller), which is very rare to distinguish diving beetles and related species from in Scotland. The earliest Scottish record is a little the ground beetles in the Carabidae. This works fairly uncertain but by 1946 N. clavicornis was in the garden well so long as one ignores the fact that many ground of the greatest proponent of water beetles, Frank beetles are confined to aquatic emergent vegetation or Balfour-Browne, in Dumfriesshire and it was first to the water’s edge.
    [Show full text]
  • A Two Year Study of Water Bugs at Priory Water
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY A Two-year Study of the Water Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Priory Water NR, Leicestershire Tony Cook 1 & Frank Clark 2 LESOPS 27 (2011) ISSN 0957 - 1019 1Barnwood Cottage, Main Street, Slawston, Market Harborough LE16 7UF (tony.cook20@btinternet,com) 2Bank Cottage, 4 Main Street, Houghton on the Hill LE7 9GD ([email protected]) 1 Introduction Water bugs have been the subject of numerous ecological studies, many of which have focused on the distribution of species in relation to particular features of aquatic habitats. Macan (1954) suggests that the Corixidae is an attractive family for ecological studies because most of the species (nearly 40 in the UK) are common and widely distributed but have restricted habitats. The abiotic and biotic habitat characteristics that influence water bug distributions are complex, involving water chemistry, competition and predation among others. Macan (1938) examined the relationship between corixids and the amount of organic material present in the sediment of lakes and ponds in the Lake District and showed some species occurred only in oligotrophic habitats while others were confined to later successional, eutrophic habitats with higher levels of organic material. Looking at this association from a different point of view, Popham (1943) suggested that the background colour of different habitats influenced distribution with lighter coloured species in low organic matter habitats and vice versa . Savage (1982, 1990) investigated the correlation between corixid distribution and the conductivity of water bodies, conductivity being a measure of the concentration of dissolved ions. This varies widely in freshwater habitats along the oligotrophic– eutrophic spectrum, from below 50µS (micro-Siemens) to about 1,000µS.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in Ponds Across an Urban Land-Use Gradient in Birmingham, U.K
    Water quality, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in ponds across an urban land-use gradient in Birmingham, U.K. Ian Adam George Thornhill A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham December 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The ecology of ponds is threatened by urbanisation and as cities expand pond habitats are disappearing at an alarming rate. Pond communities are structured by local (water quality, physical) and regional (land-use, connectivity) processes. Since ca1904 >80% of ponds in Birmingham, U.K., have been lost due to land-use intensification, resulting in an increasingly diffuse network. A survey of thirty urban ponds revealed high spatial and temporal variability in water quality, which frequently failed environmental standards. Most were eutrophic, although macrophyte-rich, well connected ponds supported macroinvertebrate assemblages of high conservation value. Statistically, local physical variables (e.g. shading) explained more variation, both in water quality and macroinvertebrate community composition than regional factors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Dynamics of a Water Beetle Community in a Semipermanent Wetland (Vrbenské Rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia)
    Department of Ecosystem Biology Faculty of Science The University of South Bohemia České Bud ějovice The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland (Vrbenské rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia) Bachelor Thesis Jan Kle čka Supervisor: Ing. MgA. David Boukal, Ph.D. České Bud ějovice 2008 1 Bachelor Thesis Kle čka, J., 2008: The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland (Vrbenské rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia). BSc. Thesis, in English – 63 pp., Faculty of Science, The University of South Bohemia, České Bud ějovice, Czech Republic. Annotation In my thesis I examined the structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland in an alder carr. The results are based on three years of my field work and processing of material collected by a light trap at the study site during five years. The thesis focuses on: 1. Comparison of selectivity and efficiency of several widely used sampling methods; 2. Seasonal dynamics and effects of environmental variables on flight acitivity; 3. Spatiotemporal dynamics and effects of habitat structure and fluctuations in water levels. General patterns and relationships are highlighted. Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalá řskou práci jsem vypracoval samostatn ě pouze s použitím pramen ů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném zn ění souhlasím se zve řejn ěním své bakalá řské práce, a to v nezkrácené podob ě elektronickou cestou ve ve řejn ě přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jiho českou univerzitou v Českých Bud ějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Abellán Et Al
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC Range shifts in Quaternary European aquatic Coleoptera Pedro Abellán1,2*, Cesar J. Benetti1, Robert B. Angus3 and Ignacio Ribera1,2 1 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain 2 Instituto de Biología Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3 School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Sur- rey TW20 0EX, UK *Correspondence: Pedro Abellán, Instituto de Biología Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] Running header: Range shifts in Quaternary water beetles 1 ABSTRACT Aim To undertake a quantitative review of the Quaternary fossil record of European water beetles to evaluate their geographical and temporal coverage, and to characterize the extent and typology of the shifts in their geographical ranges. Location Europe. Methods We compiled Quaternary water beetle records from public databases and published references. We included in the analyses species of ten families of aquatic Coleoptera, and recorded range shifts through the comparison of the location of fossil remains with the current distribution of the species. We explored the ecological representativeness of the fossil record, as well as the relationship between range shifts and the habitat type of the species. Results Our final data set included over 9,000 records for 259 water beetle species. Aquatic beetle fossil remains have been documented exclusively north of 42º N, with most of the records from the British Isles and virtually none from Southern Europe or the Mediterranean Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Foster, Warne, A
    ISSN 0966 2235 LATISSIMUS NEWSLETTER OF THE BALFOUR-BROWNE CLUB Number Forty October 2017 The name for the Malagasy striped whirligig Heterogyrus milloti Legros is given as fandiorano fahagola in Malagasy in the paper by Grey Gustafson et al. (see page 2) 1 LATISSIMUS 40 October 2017 STRANGE PROTOZOA IN WATER BEETLE HAEMOCOELS Robert Angus (c) (a) (b) (d) (e) Figure Parasites in the haemocoel of Hydrobius rottenbergii Gerhardt One of the stranger findings from my second Chinese trip (see “On and Off the Plateau”, Latissimus 29 23 – 28) was an infestation of small ciliated balls in the haemocoel of a Boreonectes emmerichi Falkenström taken is a somewhat muddy pool near Xinduqao in Sichuan. This pool is shown in Fig 4 on p 25 of Latissimus 29. When I removed the abdomen, in colchicine solution in insect saline (for chromosome preparation) what appeared to a mass of tiny bubbles appeared. My first thought was that I had foolishly opened the beetle in alcoholic fixative, but this was disproved when the “bubbles” began swimming around in a manner characteristic of ciliary locomotion. At the time I was not able to do anything with them, but it was something the like of which I had never seen before. Then, as luck would have it, on Tuesday Max Barclay brought back from the Moscow region of Russia a single living male Hydrobius rottenbergii Gerhardt. This time I injected the beetle with colchicine solution and did not open it up (remove the abdomen) till I had transferred it to ½-isotonic potassium chloride. And at this stage again I was confronted with a mass of the same self-propelled “bubbles”.
    [Show full text]