DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Integrated Noble Gas and Hydrocarbon Geochemistry to Constrain the Source of Hydrocarbon Gases in Shallow Aquifers in the Northern Appalachian Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Integrated Noble Gas and Hydrocarbon Geochemistry to Constrain the Source of Hydrocarbon Gases in Shallow Aquifers in the Northern Appalachian Basin Using integrated noble gas and hydrocarbon geochemistry to constrain the source of hydrocarbon gases in shallow aquifers in the northern Appalachian Basin Authors: DARRAH, Thomas1*, VENGOSH, Avner1, JACKSON, Robert1,2, WARNER, Nathaniel1, Walsh, T.3, and POREDA, Robert3 (1) Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, [email protected]; (2) Nicholas School of the Environment and Center on Global Change, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708; (3) Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, 227 Hutchison Hall, Rochester, NY 14627 *Corresponding author email: [email protected] I. Abstract III. Geological Background IV. Dissolved Gas and Inorganic Tracers Rising demands for domestic energy sources, mandates for cleaner burning fuels for The Appalachian Basin is an archetypal energy-producing foreland basin that has evolved in electricity generation, and the approach of peak global hydrocarbon production are driving the response to complex tectonic processes and climatic conditions since the Paleozoic (e.g., Faill, 1997). In transformation from coal to natural gas from unconventional energy resources. This transit has been the NAB, the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks were deposited during the Taconic and Acadian orogenies and aided by recent advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies, which have deformed in the subsequent Alleghanian orogeny (Ettensohn and Brett, 2002). Today the complex substantially increased the potential for the recovery of natural gas and oil from organic-rich black depositional and tectonic history of this area is subtly expressed within the northern section of Appalachian shales globally. Nonetheless, public and political enthusiasm and consent is tempered by various Plateau physiographic province as gently dipping strata (overall dip magnitudes of ~ 1-3 degrees) that are concerns regarding the environmental risks associated with shale gas development, specifically broadly folded due to salt cored detachment folds, and further deformed by layer parallel shortening, drinking-water quality (e.g. contamination from hydraulic fracturing fluids, production/flow back waters, reverse faults, and fracturing (e.g., Davis and Engelder, 1985; Engelder, 1979; Sak et al., 2012). and/or stray combustible gases). Thus, questions and concerns regarding the significance of elevated The oldest lithologies of interest in the study area consist of the interbedded limestones and levels of combustible gas in shallow aquifers has been at the forefront of these concerns. shales of the Middle Ordovician Trenton/Black River Group. These rocks, and the overlying organic-rich Utica shale, represent Taconic orogenic sediments (Milici and Witt, 1988). The lower most Silurian age Previously, Osborn et al 2011 identified 17-times higher concentrations of thermally strata contains the fine-grained Tuscarora Formation sandstones, while the Upper Silurian is characterized mature methane (CH4) and aliphatic hydrocarbons (e.g. ethane (C2H6)) in drinking water wells within by the transition from the Silurian Lockport Dolomite/McKenzie argillaceous limestone to the Bloomsburg 1km of shale gas development sites producing from the Marcellus Shale in northeastern Pennsylvania. red sandstone and evaporitic Salina Group (Straeten et al., 1994). The Salina Group consists of While these findings suggest a correlation between areas of shale gas development and elevated interbedded shales, dolomites, and salt deposits that act as the regional decollement for Alleghanian methane concentrations in shallow aquifers, others suggest that the presence of methane in shallow structures (Scanlin and Engelder, 2003). As a result, structural folds and faults above the decollement (i.e. groundwater aquifers is common, natural, and unrelated to shale gas development (e.g. Molofsky et Devonian and younger stratigraphic units) bear little resemblance in deformation style to those present n al, 2011). Indeed, examples of natural methane seeps are identified in the northern Appalachian Basin beneath the Salina Group (e.g., Scanlin and Engelder, 2003). (e.g. Salt Spring State Park, Montrose, PA) (Warner et al, 2012). The transition from Upper Silurian to Lower Devonian is comprised of the Upper Silurian Helderberg Group (layered dolomites and limestones) and Lower Devonian Oriskany Sandstone. At the The potential for elevated methane concentrations from both natural geological base of the Middle Devonian sits the Onondaga/Selinsgrove limestones, which lies directly beneath the migration and anthropogenic activities highlights the need to develop and validate advanced Middle Devonian aged Hamilton Group (Straeten et al., 2011). The Hamilton Group is an eastward to geochemical systematics (e.g. integrated noble gas and hydrocarbon molecular and isotope southeastward thickening wedge of marine sediments that includes the organic- and siliciclastic-rich, geochemistry) capable of evaluating the source, timing, and migration history of hydrocarbon gases hydrocarbon producing Marcellus subgroup at its base (Straeten et al., 2011). The Marcellus at is ~380 ± currently present within shallow aquifers. Herein, we present our initial assessment of the dissolved Figure 5: Variations of [Cl], [Ba], [CH4], and [He] in groundwater and natural salt-rich spring located gas (noble gas and hydrocarbon molecular and isotopic) geochemistry of shallow aquifers in the 15Ma; its age and burial depths were sufficient for the production of mature thermogenic hydrocarbon gases (Engelder and Whitaker, 2006). The UD consists of thick synorogenic deposits including the Brallier, >1km from active shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania and New York. Sample colors indicate the county northeastern tier of Pennsylvania and southeastern tier of New York State. 4 Lock Haven, and Catskill Formations (Figure 3). The latter two formations constitute the two primary where samples were located. CH4 and He concentrations increase with Cl and Ba across the study lithologies that serve as aquifers in northeastern PA, along with the overlying glacial and sedimentary area. The Cl-rich fluids contain elevated Br-/Cl- and Ba/Sr, as well as 87Sr/86Sr consistent with Middle alluvium. Devonian Formation brines (i.e., Marcellus-type) (Warner et al, 2012). Notice that the increase in [CH4] II. Sampling and Methods In the Appalachian plateau physiographic province, the rocks above the Silurian-aged Salina "rolls over" as methane concentrations approach saturation levels for shallow groundwater. The upper formation (including the Marcellus formation) deformed by stably sliding along their basal decollement as limit (solubility saturation = 40 cc/L at 1 atm) for [CH4] demonstrates how groundwater solubility limits We examine the dissolved gas isotopic compositions of 72 domestic groundwater part of the Appalachian plateau detachment sheet (Davis and Engelder, 1985). Deformation within the the maximum dissolved gas concentrations. The positive correlations of [4He] with [Cl], [Ba], and [CH ] wells and one natural methane seep within a seven county area of PA (Bradford, Sullivan, Appalachian plateau detachment sheet is significantly less intense than the Valley and Ridge and is 4 suggests previous migration of a gas-rich, saline fluid from deeper formations into Upper Devonian Susquehanna, and Wayne counties) and NY (Broome, Delaware and Sullivan counties). The accommodated by a combination of layer parallel shortening, folding that lead to the broad 4 study area is within the NAB Plateau region underlain by the Marcellus Shale (~800-2200m anticline/syncline sequences, duplex/thrust faulting structures, and jointing (Lash and Engelder, 2009; aquifers across the region. The coexistence of CH4 and [ He] suggests a thermogenic source of depth) (Figure 2). We integrate our data with previous work on the principal aquifers of the region Scanlin and Engelder, 2003). Each of these deformation features is present and observable within our methane. (Alluvium, Catskill, and Lock Haven) including salt concentrations (i.e., Cl, Ba) and hydrocarbon study area. A combination of thrust-load-induced subsidence, clastic loading, and Alleghanian deformation molecular and isotopic composition (Warner et al., 2012). We place these data within the led to the onset of thermal maturation and eventually catagenesis for the Marcellus Formation. This same geological history of the NAB. This study includes only data from wells located >1km from active hydrocarbon maturation and resulting fluid over-pressuring is suggested as the force that initiated the shale gas development sites including samples targeted for naturally occurring CH4 along with pervasive and systematic joint sets in the Devonian sedimentary sequences throughout the Appalachian plateau (i.e. J and J ) (Engelder et al., 2009; Lash and Engelder, 2009). In our study area, these joint sets other nearby domestic wells in order to characterize geological context of naturally elevated CH4 1 2 V. Noble Gases: Conservative Fingerprint Tracers in the NAB. often cross-cut and are un-mineralized (Lash and Engelder, 2009). All groundwater samples (n=73) were analyzed for their major gas abundance (e.g., 4 21 CH4, C2H6, N2, O2) and noble gas composition (He, Ne, Ar, Kr). The stable carbon isotopic Figure 4: The release of radiogenic isotopes ( He, Ne*, 13 40 composition of methane (δ C-CH4) was determined for all samples with [CH4] exceeding 0.5 cc/L and Ar*) is a function
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin
    DOE/NETL-2011/1478 A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors greatly thank Daniel J. Soeder (U.S. Department of Energy) who kindly reviewed the manuscript. His criticisms, suggestions, and support significantly improved the content, and we are deeply grateful. Cover. Top left: The Barnett Shale exposed on the Llano uplift near San Saba, Texas. Top right: The Marcellus Shale exposed in the Valley and Ridge Province near Keyser, West Virginia. Photographs by Kathy R. Bruner, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Bottom: Horizontal Marcellus Shale well in Greene County, Pennsylvania producing gas at 10 million cubic feet per day at about 3,000 pounds per square inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 GEOLOGY
    Chapter 4 GEOLOGY CHAPTER 4 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.2 BLACK SHALES ................................................................................................................................................. 4‐3 4.3 UTICA SHALE ................................................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.3.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐14 4.3.3 Potential for Gas Production ............................................................................................................ 4‐14 4.4 MARCELLUS FORMATION ................................................................................................................................. 4‐15 4.4.1 Total Organic Carbon ....................................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.3 Potential for Gas Production ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections
    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Walker-Milani, Margaret E., "Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3327. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3327 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani THESIS submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Richard Smosna, Ph.D., Chair Timothy Carr, Ph.D. John Renton, Ph.D. Kathy Bruner, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcellus Shale,” Hamilton Group [email protected] 2045 Morse Rd., Bldg
    Matthew S. Erenpreiss Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Mapping the Regional Organic Thickness of the “Marcellus Shale,” Hamilton Group [email protected] 2045 Morse Rd., Bldg. C-2, Columbus, OH 43229-6693 ABSTRACT • Regional and statewide isopach maps Shale” in each county and township, where available; this newly compiled data and observing the “Marcellus ASHTABULA REFERENCES WILLIAMS FULTON LUCAS OTTAWA LAKE GEAUGA WOOD Lash, G.G., and Engelder, Terry, 2011, Thickness HENRY TRUMBULL have been developed for the Middle Devonian “Marcellus this approach allowed for an even distribution of control Shale” upper and lower units, net organic thickness SANDUSKY CUYAHOGA DEFIANCE ERIE LORAIN trends and sequence stratigraphy of the Middle PORTAGE HURON SUMMIT Devonian Marcellus Formation, Appalachian Basin— PAULDING SENECA MEDINA Shale” for use in assessing Ohio’s shale gas potential. points and more consistent correlations. This correlation was calculated and contoured. Additional data was also PUTNAM HANCOCK MAHONING Implications for Acadian foreland basin evolution: VAN WERT WYANDOT CRAWFORD RICHLAND ASHLAND WAYNE AAPG Bulletin, v. 95, no. 1, p. 61–103. Existing stratigraphic analyses of Devonian shales in Ohio expansion of the Hamilton Group, “Marcellus Shale,” collected from the state geological surveys of New York, ALLEN STARK COLUMBIANA Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 1988, Analysis of HARDIN MERCER CARROLL stratigraphic and production relationships of Devonian MARION AUGLAIZE HOLMES MORROW TUSCARAWAS shale gas reservoirs in Ohio–Final report October were used as the starting dataset, which was expanded and Onondaga Limestone was based on U.S. Geological Pennsylvania, and West Virginia to create a new regional LOGAN KNOX SHELBY UNION JEFFERSON COSHOCTON HARRISON DELAWARE 1985–November 1988 (prepared for Gas Research DARKE A’ Institute): Ohio Department of Natural Resources, CHAMPAIGN LICKING with additional geophysical logs that span the “Marcellus Survey cross sections published in Bulletin 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Appalachia's Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus Formations
    Analysis of Appalachia’s Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus Formations’ Geology on Estimated Ultimate Recovery Nicholas Cuaresma and Brittany Martin 2019, Marietta College Cuaresma and Martin 2 Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimum horizontal wellbore azimuths in the Ordovician Utica/Point Pleasant Formation and Devonian Marcellus Formation unconventional petroleum plays in three locations in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, from data contributed by Knobloch Petroleum of Marietta, Ohio. The assumption was that the stress state in the crust determined both the orientations of natural hydraulic fractures formed during the Pennsylvanian Alleghanian orogeny would control the orientation of the fractures formed during present day hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells. Therefore, the orientation of the horizontal wellbores with respect to fracture orientations would affect the estimated ultimate recovery of petroleum. Multivariable regression analyses, with estimated ultimate recovery as the dependent variable and amount of water used during hydraulic fracturing, amount of sand used as a fracture proppant, and the horizontal wellbore azimuth as the independent variables, were run using data from 1400 wells. A brief overview of the geology of the Appalachian basin, the basin in which both the Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus formations were deposited, along with an explanation of the conditions under which natural hydraulic fracturing occurs were included in the study. The study concluded that the amount of water used during hydraulic fracturing in Ohio has the largest effect on the estimated ultimate recovery and the amount of sand used as a fracture proppant in Pennsylvania and West Virginia a numerically large effect on the estimated ultimate recovery, whereas the orientation (azimuth) of the wellbore appears to have an insignificant effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992
    Guidebook for the llth Annual Field Trip of the Harrisburg Area Geological Society May 9, 1992 Paleozoic Geology of the Paw Paw-Hancock Area of Maryland and West Virginia by Marcus M. Key, Jr. and Noel Potter, Jr. Dickinson College TABLE OF CONTENTS . .. List of F1gures . .............................................. 111 Introduction . ....................................... · ......... 1 Road Log • ..•... • ..... · .... • •.....•....•...•......• e ••• '0 ••••••••• 3 Stop 1. Roundtop Hill . ............ o •••••••••• o •••••••••••••••••• 5 stop 2. Sideling Hill Road Cut ..•.••............••.••••......... 8 Stop 3. Sideling Hill Diamictite Exposure ....•.•....•.•....•... 11 Stop 4. Cacapon Mountain Overlook .••.......•......•.•••••...... 15 Stop 5. Fluted Rocks Overlook .•..•••.••....•.•.•••.•........... 16 Stop 6. Fluted Rocks ................. .,. .......... ., o ••••• ., •••••• • 19 Stop 7. Berkeley Springs state Park •...•.....................•. 20 Acknowled·gments . ........................... :- ... e ••••••••••••••• 21 References .....••.•..•.•••.•..•.•..•.••......................•. 2 2 Topogrpphic maps covering field trip stops: USGS 7 1/2 minute quadrangles Bellegrove (MD-PA-WV), Great Cacapon (WV-MD), Hancock (WV-MD-PA) Cover Photo: Anticline in Silurian Bloomsburg Formation. From Stose and swartz (1912). The anticline is visible from the towpath of the c & 0 Canal at Roundtop Hill (Stop# 1). Guidebook copies may be obtained by writing: Harrisburg Area Geological Society cjo Pennsylvania Geological Survey P.O. Box 2357 Harrisburg,
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical and Mineralogical Sampling of the Devonian Shales in the Broadtop Synclinorium, Appalachian Basin, in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania
    Geochemical and Mineralogical Sampling of the Devonian Shales in the Broadtop Synclinorium, Appalachian Basin, in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania By Catherine B. Enomoto, James L. Coleman, Jr., Christopher S. Swezey, Patrick W. Niemeyer, and Frank T. Dulong Open-File Report 2015–1061 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner Suggested citation: Enomoto, C.B., Coleman, J.L., Jr., Swezey, C.S., Niemeyer, P.W., and Dulong, F.T., 2015, Geochemical and mineralogical sampling of the Devonian shales in the Broadtop synclinorium, Appalachian basin, in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015‒1061, 32 p., 5 pls., 1 appendix, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151061. ISSN 2331-1258 (online). Contents Abstract .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46Th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017
    Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017 Program with Abstracts Hosted by: Appalachian Geological Society West Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography With support from the West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Meeting Sponsors We appreciate your support! Marcellus Level Meeting Sponsors Utica Level Rogersville Level We appreciate your support! Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017 Program with Abstracts Hosted by: Appalachian Geological Society West Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography With support from the West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Cover photo used with permission from Jacob Everhart, Canary, LLC Contents Welcome………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 2017 Meeting Organizing Committee……………………………………………………………………………….1 Eastern Section AAPG Officers………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Appalachian Geological Society Officers……………………………………………………………………………2 General Information…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Registration Hours……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Parking………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….3 Maps………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Exhibits……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……3 Presenters and Judges Room……………………………………………………………………………………..….…3 Presenters, Judges and Session Chairs Breakfast and Information……………………………………3
    [Show full text]
  • The Marcellus Shale: Erosional Boundary and Production Analysis, Southern West Virginia, U.S.A
    THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. by Mallory Stevenson November, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Donald W. Neal Major Department: Geological Sciences The Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale is a natural gas producing formation that was deposited in the Appalachian foreland basin in what is now eastern North America. An unconformity truncates the Marcellus in southern West Virginia and progressively younger units onlap progressively older units. The zero isopach line that marks the edge of the Marcellus is mapped to reveal the southeastern boundary. A well production analysis is conducted to locate the region of maximum natural gas production. Four lithologic completions intervals in three different well fields are compared. This study shows that the most economically viable drilling is from the Marcellus Shale completion intervals that are less than 30 feet in Chapmanville gas field in western Logan County, West Virginia. Outside of the zero isopach are areas comprised of onlapping featheredges of younger formations that comprise a black shale unit mistakenly identified as “Marcellus Shale.” These areas produce significantly less gas than the “true” Marcellus Shale. THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. A Thesis Presented To the Faculty of the Department of Geological Sciences East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Geology by Mallory Stevenson November, 2015 © Mallory Stevenson, 2015 THE MARCELLUS SHALE: EROSIONAL BOUNDARY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, U.S.A. by Mallory Stevenson APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: ______________________________________ Donald W.
    [Show full text]