DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Policy Networks in the Gatt Uruguay Round: the Case of the Us-Ec Agricultural Negotiations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Policy Networks in the Gatt Uruguay Round: the Case of the Us-Ec Agricultural Negotiations THE IMPACT OF POLICY NETWORKS IN THE GATT URUGUAY ROUND: THE CASE OF THE US-EC AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS HEIDI KAREN ULLRICH LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS DEPARTMENTS OF GOVERNMENT AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2002 1 UMI Number: U174118 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U174118 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 r:^ POLITICAL & AN° 4 f Zou 9fe^7o) ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the membership, activities and policy impact of three distinct groups of policy networks operating within and between the agricultural policy environments of the US and EC as well as at the multilateral level during the preparation for and negotiations of the GATT Uruguay Round between 1980 and 1993. Briefly defined, these three groups are: 1) epistemic communities - networks of professionals who share both specialized knowledge and expertise in a specific issue area; 2) advocacy coalitions - policy actors from various levels of the policy process who share common policy beliefs and work together to turn these policy beliefs into government policy; and 3) elite transnational networks - incorporating political leaders, political appointees and senior government and international institutional officials, these elite level networks are formed through regular contact in either an official or unofficial capacity. The contention of this thesis is that various networks of actors within the distinct policy networks of epistemic communities, advocacy coalitions and elite transnational networks contributed significantly to bringing about the reform of agricultural policy that occurred within the EC and the US between 1980 and 1993 allowing for the establishment of consensus on the liberalization of agricultural trade policy at the multilateral level of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade during the Uruguay Round. The hypothesis of this thesis is that these three policy networks varied in their impact according to the specific stage of negotiations due to changing policy needs. I argue that in general: 1) epistemic communities exhibited the most impact during the agenda-setting stage owing in part to their expertise in agricultural trade issues, the existence of a common framework for discussion and their work in creating analytical tools that allowed agricultural liberalization to be politically and economically viable; 2) advocacy coalitions had the most significant role during the second, or policy-making stage, due to their ability to work within the policy environment and shape domestic policy development; and 3) elite transnational networks, due to their ability to provide the necessary political pressure, had the greatest impact in the third, or breakthrough stage. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ..................................................................................1 Abstract ..................................................................................2 Table of Contents..................................................................... 3-4 Dedication ..................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ................................................................. 6-7 Abbreviations ..................................................................... 8-10 Chapter 1 Introduction................................................ 11-39 Chapter 2 Definition, Analysis and Placement of Policy Network Groups within the Literature....................................................4--106 Chapter 3 EU Agricultural and Agricultural Trade Policies: Principles, Process, and Policy Actors........................................107-159 Chapter 4 US Agricultural and Agricultural Trade Policies: Principles, Process and Policy Actors........................................160-201 Chapter 5 The Impact of Policy Networks During the Agenda-Setting Stage (January 1980 - October 1987)................. 202-257 Chapter 6 The Impact of Policy Networks During the Policy-Making Stage (July 1987 - July 1991)..............................258-328 3 Chapter 7 The Impact of Policy Networks During the Breakthrough Stage (July 1991 - December 1993)...................329-390 Chapter 8 Conclusion............................................. ....391-405 Appendix A Selected List of Members of the Agricultural Policy Reform Epistemic Community During the Uruguay Round..........................................................406-408 Appendix B Selected List of Studies and Associations Advocating Agricultural Liberalization During the Uruguay Round...........................................................409-413 Appendix C Comparison of US and EC Agricultural Proposals During the Uruguay Round......................................414-415 Appendix D Research Notes.............................................. 416-419 Bibliography 420-451 4 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my mother, Vera Marta Ullrich (nee Schiitz) (1929-1997). My idol and my best friend. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and patience of many individuals. The guidance, knowledge and friendship of my joint supervisors, Dr. Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey and Professor Paul Taylor, have been a source of great inspiration. Their continuous encouragement of my intellectual growth and academic experience has had an overwhelming impact on my personal and professional development. They have my most sincere respect and heartfelt thanks. The LSE Departments of Government and International Relations deserve commendation for providing superb administrative support during the process of preparing this study as well as financial support in the form of travel grants for various conferences. The experience gained through research positions has added significantly to my thesis. For showing me that the formulation of both US and multilateral trade policy is based as much on personal dedication as on professional expertise, I owe a debt of gratitude to the staff of the US Mission to the World Trade Organization in Geneva, particularly former Ambassador Rita Hayes, Andrew Stoler, Bob Kasper and Gene Philhower. Through involving me in the process of preparing the 1999 WTO Ministerial Draft Text, representing the US in Trade Policy Reviews and carrying out research on agricultural markets, they provided insights into the intricacies of trade policy few academic accounts could hope to match. Serving as a research assistant to Member of the European Parliament Alan Donnelly on two separate occasions between 1993 and 1998 was instrumental in the development of this thesis. I am grateful to Alan for introducing me to the activities of the Group of Seven/Eight, expanding my 6 knowledge of the political and economic issues surrounding transatlantic relations and granting me the flexibility necessary to carry out my empirical research. I would also like to give a word of thanks to my colleagues at the University of Toronto’s G8 Research Group, specifically its director Professor John Kirton, for encouraging my interest in elite transnational networks and providing endless opportunities to broaden my horizons. Throughout my time at the LSE, friends and colleagues have provided not only useful advice but also much needed humor, perspective and emotional support. I am thankful for the special friendship of Anne Corbett, Jubin Goodarzi, Christina Lin, Elisa Roller, Nidhi Trehan and Michele Wollstonecroft. Without them, this thesis would consist merely of words rather than a coherent whole. The encouragement of my family to pursue my goals has been of paramount importance in the realization of this thesis. In particular, I have benefited enormously from my mother’s enthusiasm for knowledge, history and political debate. Her recognition that I was happiest surrounded by books gave me the courage and confidence necessary to conclude this thesis. Finally, I owe great thanks to my husband, Roger Oelke, for his unending supply of patience in my obsession with agricultural liberalization and policy networks as well as for showing me the world beyond academia. 7 ABBREVIATIONS AAA Agricultural Adjustment Act ACF Advocacy Coalition Framework ACTPN Advisory Committee for Trade Policy Negotiations AFB American Farm Bureau Federation AMS Aggregate Measure of Support APAC Agricultural Policy Advisory Committee (within the US) APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation ATAC Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee (within the US) ASCS Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations CAP Common Agricultural Policy (within the EU) CCP Common Commercial Policy (within the EU) CEP Common External Tariff CG18 Consultative Group of Eighteen of the GATT COPA-COGECA Committee of Agricultural Organizations in the European Union COREPER Committee of Permanent Representatives C.P.s Contracting Parties
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The European Social Dialogue the History of a Social Innovation (1985-2003) — Jean Lapeyre Foreword by Jacques Delors Afterword by Luca Visentini
    European Trade Union Institute Bd du Roi Albert II, 5 1210 Brussels Belgium +32 (0)2 224 04 70 [email protected] www.etui.org “Compared to other works on the European Social Dialogue, this book stands out because it is an insider’s story, told by someone who was for many years the linchpin, on the trade unions’ side, of this major accomplishment of social Europe.” The European social dialogue — Emilio Gabaglio, ETUC General Secretary (1991-2003) “The author, an ardent supporter of the European Social Dialogue, has put his heart and soul into this The history of a social meticulous work, which is enriched by his commitment as a trade unionist, his capacity for indignation, and his very French spirit. His book will become an essential reference work.” — Wilfried Beirnaert, innovation (1985-2003) Managing Director and Director General at the Federation of Belgian Enterprises (FEB) (1981-1998) — “This exhaustive appraisal, written by a central actor in the process, reminds us that constructing social Europe means constructing Europe itself and aiming for the creation of a European society; Jean Lapeyre something to reflect upon today in the face of extreme tendencies which are threatening the edifice.” — Claude Didry, Sociologist and Director of Research at the National Centre of Scientific Research (CNRS) Foreword by Jacques Delors (Maurice Halbwachs Centre, École Normale Supérieure) Afterword by Luca Visentini This book provides a history of the construction of the European Social Dialogue between 1985 and 2003, based on documents and interviews with trade union figures, employers and dialogue social European The The history of a social innovation (1985-2003) Jean Lapeyre European officials, as well as on the author’s own personal account as a central actor in this story.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Jahre Lebensministerium
    JAHRE LEBENS- MINISTERIUM Von der Ernährungssicherung der Nachkriegszeit zur verlässlichen Verbraucherinformation und nachhaltigen Landwirtschaft der Zukunft INHALT Vorwort 03 Einführung und Überblick 04 Aus der Geschichte des Ministeriums seit 1949 06 Die Anfangszeit 06 Die fünfziger Jahre 08 Die sechziger Jahre 10 Die siebziger Jahre 11 Die achtziger Jahre 12 Die neunziger Jahre 13 Von 2000 bis 2010 14 Von 2010 bis heute 17 VORWORT Liebe Leserinnen Für eine steigende Bevölkerungszahl müssen immer mehr und Leser, Lebensmittel produziert werden – bei geringerer Fläche. Das löst Zielkonflikte aus. Landwirtschaft muss heute vier Jahre nach Kriegsende war im Jahr 1949 mit der daher mehr schaffen, als nur zu ernähren. Landwirtschaft Gründung der Bundesrepublik wieder politische Stabilität muss vieles unter einen Hut bringen: Sie muss internatio- eingekehrt. Die Situation der Bevölkerung war aber nach nal und regional sein, muss Tier-, Umwelt- und Natur- wie vor teilweise katastrophal: Millionen Bürger lebten schutz berücksichtigen und gleichzeitig wettbewerbsfähig buchstäblich noch in Trümmern – Wiederaufbau, Kälte, sein. Landwirtschaft muss innovativ und digital sein, aber Krankheiten und auch Hunger prägten ihren Alltag. auch gesellschaftliche Erwartungen erfüllen. Dem im September 1949 gegründeten Bundesministe- rium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten kam 2019 ist aber auch deshalb ein besonderes Jubiläumsjahr, damit eine wesentliche Aufgabe zu: die Ernährungssiche- weil die Geschichte des Ministeriums nicht erst 1949, rung der deutschen
    [Show full text]
  • Ihnen Allen Wünsche Ich Von Ganzem Herzen Ein Glückliches, Gesundes
    Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Mitglieder ! Dialog über engere Zusammenarbeit Ihnen allen wünsche ich von ganzem Herzen ein Über Möglichkeiten einer verstärkten Zusam- glückliches, gesundes und erfolgreiches Jahr menarbeit beraten seit einigen Wochen die VdK- 2006! Für den Sozialverband VdK Kreisverband Kreisverbände Krefeld, Mönchengladbach und Krefeld wird dieses 2006 ein ganz besonderes Viersen. Erörtert werden dabei insbesondere Jahr! Wir feiern am 13. August 2006 um 10 Uhr Chancen einer Kostenreduzierung, ohne dadurch im Stadtwaldhaus unser 60 jähriges Bestehen. die ortsnahen Angebote für die Mitglieder zu ver- Dies ist gleichzeitig ein Dankeschön an unsere ringern. Der VdK Kreisverband Krefeld hat zur- Gründergeneration, die diese großartige Selbst- zeit etwa 2.500 Mitglieder, während dem Ver- hilfeorganisation gegründet und zum größten band in Mönchengladbach 2.800 Personen und Sozialverband in Krefeld, NRW und in der Bun- dem VdK im Kreis Viersen 1.400 Menschen an- desrepublik geführt hat. Unser Präsident, Walter gehören. Hirrlinger, und unser Oberbürgermeister, Gregor Kathstede, sind die Schirmherren dieses Festak- Aktivitäten des VdK Linn / Stratum tes und werden die Festreden halten. Wir werden Sie alle noch persönlich einladen und freuen uns Das traditionelle Nachmittagstreffen des VdK- jetzt schon auf das Wiedersehen mit Ihnen! Ortsverbandes Linn / Stratum im Linner Kleingar- Spätestens bis dahin tenvereinsheim Nord-Ost mit einer Mischung aus Informationen, Gesprächen und geselligem Bei- Ihr Friedrich Noth sammensein fand wieder guten Anklang bei Mit- gliedern und Gästen. Musik und Show beim VdK Hüls Auch ein Halbtagsausflug zum Brüggener Klimmt Im diesmaligen VdK-Café des Ortsverbandes fand großes Interesse. Ein Bus holte die Teil- Hüls ließ die gute Laune wie gewohnt nicht lange nehmerinnen und Teilnehmer aus Linn ab.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2010-2014 (Barroso II Commission) Cecilia Malmström
    Торговельна політика ЄС Що Карел залишає Сесилії? Роберт Хорольський, к.ю.н., радник Юридичної фірми «ОМП» 24 вересня 2014 року, м. Київ Karel De Gucht • Born 1954, a Belgian politician • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), liberal • In 2009-2010, European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid (Barroso I Commission) • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2010-2014 (Barroso II Commission) Cecilia Malmström • Born 1968, a Swedish politician • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE), liberal • In 2010-2014, European Commissioner for Home Affairs (Barroso II Commission) • The European Commissioner for Trade in 2014-2019 (Juncker Commission) European Commissioners for Trade since 1957 Jean Rey Belgium 1957–1962 Hallstein Commission I 1962–1967 Hallstein Commission II Jean-François Deniau France 1968–1970 Rey Commission Ralf Dahrendorf W.Germany 1970–1972 Malfatti Commission 1972–1973 Mansholt Commission Christopher Soames UK 1973–1977 Ortoli Commission Wilhelm Haferkamp W.Germany 1977–1981 Jenkins Commission 1981–1985 Thorn Commission Willy De Clercq Belgium 1985–1988 Delors Commission I Frans Andriessen Netherlands 1989–1992 Delors Commission II Leon Brittan UK 1993–1995 Delors Commission III 1995–1999 Santer Commission Pascal Lamy France 1999–2004 Prodi Commission Danuta Hübner Poland 2004 Prodi Commission Peter Mandelson UK 2004–2008 Barroso Commission I Catherine Ashton UK 2008–2009 Barroso Commission I Benita Ferrero-Waldner Austria 2009–2010 Barroso Commission I Karel De Gucht Belgium
    [Show full text]
  • Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword
    Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword THIS BOOK ON THE HISTORY AND WORKS OF ART of the Centre William Rappard of the works, donated by countries and labour would not have been possible ten years ago. The reason for this is simple: despite unions during the ILO era, had been either the building’s rich past, illustrious occupants and proud appearance, it was a little concealed or removed. In restoring these works, antiquated and not particularly well known or even well liked. Located in a magnificent the WTO took on an identity that was not strictly park on the shore of Lake Geneva, with a spectacular view of the Alps, it has a speaking its own, but of which its staff and somewhat turbulent past. Members have become proud. AS THE FIRST BUILDING IN GENEVA built to house an international organization, THE WORKS OF ART PRESENTED IN THIS BOOK , many of which have been the Centre William Rappard, named after a leading Swiss diplomat, was originally given a new lease of life by the WTO, display a wide variety of styles and techniques. the headquarters of the International Labour Office (ILO). The ILO left the building Many of them represent labour in its various forms – an allusion, of course, to the in 1940 during the Second World War, but later moved back in 1948, only to leave activities of the ILO, the building’s original occupant. Other works, such as Eduardo for good in 1975 when the Centre William Rappard was handed over to its new Chicharro’s “Pygmalion”, are more unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy Elitsa Garnizova A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, November 2018 Page 1 of 324 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/ PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me, and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 115,854 words; 99,109 excluding Table of Contents, Bibliography and Appendices. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that Chapter 1 was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling, and grammar by Bregtje Kamphuis, and Chapters 2 and 3 were edited by Dr Marina Cino-Pagliarello. Page 2 of 324 Abstract Non-tariff measures have become a central topic to the debate of how international trade rules and domestic regulatory choices are to co-exist.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress January 3, 1993 to January 3, 1995
    ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1993 TO JANUARY 3, 1995 FIRST SESSION—January 5, 1993, 1 to November 26, 1993 SECOND SESSION—January 25, 1994, 2 to December 1, 1994 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—J. DANFORTH QUAYLE, 3 of Indiana; ALBERT A. GORE, JR., 4 of Tennessee PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—ROBERT C. BYRD, of West Virginia SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—WALTER J. STEWART, 5 of Washington, D.C.; MARTHA S. POPE, 6 of Connecticut SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MARTHA S. POPE, 7 of Connecticut; ROBERT L. BENOIT, 6 of Maine SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—THOMAS S. FOLEY, 8 of Washington CLERK OF THE HOUSE—DONNALD K. ANDERSON, 8 of California SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—WERNER W. BRANDT, 8 of New York DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—JAMES T. MALLOY, 8 of New York DIRECTOR OF NON-LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES—LEONARD P. WISHART III, 9 of New Jersey ALABAMA Ed Pastor, Phoenix Lynn Woolsey, Petaluma SENATORS Bob Stump, Tolleson George Miller, Martinez Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco Howell T. Heflin, Tuscumbia Jon Kyl, Phoenix Ronald V. Dellums, Oakland Richard C. Shelby, Tuscaloosa Jim Kolbe, Tucson Karen English, Flagstaff Bill Baker, Walnut Creek REPRESENTATIVES Richard W. Pombo, Tracy Sonny Callahan, Mobile ARKANSAS Tom Lantos, San Mateo Terry Everett, Enterprise SENATORS Fortney Pete Stark, Hayward Glen Browder, Jacksonville Anna G. Eshoo, Atherton Tom Bevill, Jasper Dale Bumpers, Charleston Norman Y. Mineta, San Jose Bud Cramer, Huntsville David H. Pryor, Little Rock Don Edwards, San Jose Spencer Bachus, Birmingham REPRESENTATIVES Leon E. Panetta, 12 Carmel Valley Earl F.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesministerium Für Ernährung, Die Bundesminister Seit 1949
    Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Die Bundesminister seit 1949 Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten (vom 20.09.1949 bis 12.01.2001) Professor Dr. Wilhelm Niklas (CSU) Tierarzt (1887 – 1957) vom 20.09.1949 bis 20.10.1953 (siehe auch Prof. Niklas-Medaille) Heinrich Lübke (CDU) Vermessungs- und Kulturingenieur (1894 – 1972) vom 20.10.1953 bis 15.09.1959 Werner Schwarz (CDU) Diplom-Landwirt (1900 – 1982) vom 14.101959 bis 26.10.1965 Hermann Höcherl (CSU) Jurist (1912 – 1989) vom 26.10.1965 bis 21.10.1969 Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten (vom 20.09.1949 bis 12.01.2001) Josef Ertl (FDP) Diplom-Landwirt (1925 – 2000) vom 22.10.1969 bis 17.09.1982 Björn Engholm (SPD) Diplompolitologe (* 1939) vom 17.09.1982 bis 04.10.1982 Josef Ertl (FDP) Diplom-Landwirt (1925 – 2000) vom 04.10.1982 bis 29.03.1983 Ignaz Kiechle (CSU) Landwirtschaftsmeister (1930 – 2003) vom 30.03.1983 bis 21.01.1993 Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten (vom 20.09.1949 bis 12.01.2001) Jochen Borchert (CDU) Landwirtschaftsmeister und Diplomökonom (* 1940) vom 21.01.1993 bis 26.10.1998 Karl-Heinz Funke (SPD) Lehrer (höheres Lehramt) (* 1946) vom 27.10.1998 bis 12.01.2001 Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (vom 12.01.2001 bis 22.11.2005) Renate Künast (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) Juristin (* 1955) vom 12.01.2001 bis 04.10.2005 Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, (seit 22.10.2005) Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, (seit 22.10.2005) Horst Seehofer (CSU) Diplom-Verwaltungswirt (* 1949) seit 22.10.2005 Bildquelle: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Staatliche Ebene Bund Stellung der Oberste Bundesbehörde Behörde Gegründet 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorabveröffentlichung
    Deutscher Bundestag – 16. Wahlperiode – 227. Sitzung. Berlin, Donnerstag, den 18. Juni 2009 25025 (A) (C) Redetext 227. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, den 18. Juni 2009 Beginn: 9.00 Uhr Präsident Dr. Norbert Lammert: Afghanistan (International Security Assis- Die Sitzung ist eröffnet. Guten Morgen, liebe Kolle- tance Force, ISAF) unter Führung der NATO ginnen und Kollegen. Ich begrüße Sie herzlich. auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001) und folgender Resolutionen, zuletzt Resolution Bevor wir in unsere umfangreiche Tagesordnung ein- 1833 (2008) des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten treten, habe ich einige Glückwünsche vorzutragen. Die Nationen Kollegen Bernd Schmidbauer und Hans-Christian Ströbele haben ihre 70. Geburtstage gefeiert. – Drucksache 16/13377 – Überweisungsvorschlag: (Beifall) Auswärtiger Ausschuss (f) Rechtsausschuss Man will es kaum für möglich halten. Aber da unsere Verteidigungsausschuss Datenhandbücher im Allgemeinen sehr zuverlässig sind, Ausschuss für Menschenrechte und Humanitäre Hilfe (B) muss ich von der Glaubwürdigkeit dieser Angaben aus- Ausschuss für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und (D) gehen. Entwicklung Haushaltsausschuss gemäß § 96 GO Ihre 60. Geburtstage haben der Kollege Christoph (siehe 226. Sitzung) Strässer und die Bundesministerin Ulla Schmidt gefei- ert; ZP 3 Weitere Überweisungen im vereinfachten Ver- fahren (Beifall) (Ergänzung zung TOP 66) ich höre, sie seien auch schön gefeiert worden, was wir u damit ausdrücklich im Protokoll vermerkt haben. a) Beratung des Antrags der Abgeordneten Dr. Gesine Lötzsch,
    [Show full text]
  • Maes Cover.Indd 1 19/06/2004 22:58:47 EUI Working Paper RSCAS No
    EUI WORKING PAPERS RSCAS No. 2004/01 Macroeconomic and Monetary Thought at the European Commission in the 1960s Ivo Maes EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Pierre Werner Chair on European Monetary Union Maes Cover.indd 1 19/06/2004 22:58:47 EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2004/01 Ivo Maes, Macroeconomic and Monetary Thought at the European Commission in the 1960s The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies carries out disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the areas of European integration and public policy in Europe. It hosts the annual European Forum. Details of this and the other research of the centre can be found on: http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Research/. Research publications take the form of Working Papers, Policy Papers, Distinguished Lectures and books. Most of these are also available on the RSCAS website: http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Publications/. The EUI and the RSCAS are not responsible for the opinion expressed by the author(s). EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Macroeconomic and Monetary Thought at the European Commission in the 1960s IVO MAES EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2004/01 BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO DI FIESOLE (FI) All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing from the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Download and print of the electronic edition for teaching or research non commercial use is permitted on fair use grounds—one readable copy per machine and one printed copy per page.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Former Secretaries USMCA Letter
    September 18, 2019 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader McCarthy, Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer, As former Secretaries of Agriculture, we recognize how important agricultural trade is to the U.S. economy and rural America. We know from experience that improved market access creates significant benefits to U.S. farmers and ranchers. We believe that the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will benefit American agriculture and related industries. With Canada and Mexico being the first and second largest export markets for U.S. agricultural products, we believe USMCA makes positive improvements to one of our most critical trade deals. Currently, NAFTA supports more than 900,000 jobs in the U.S. food and agriculture sector and has amplified agricultural exports to our North American neighbors to $40 billion this past year. Before NAFTA went into effect in 1994, we were exporting only $9 billion worth of agricultural products to Canada and Mexico. The International Trade Commission’s recent economic analysis concluded that USMCA would benefit our agriculture sector and would deliver an additional $2.2 billion in U.S. economic activity. Trade is extremely vital to the livelihood of American farmers and the U.S. food industry. U.S. farm production exceeds domestic demand by 25 percent.
    [Show full text]