Fedex Service Guide
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Holiday Last Day to Ship
2021 Shipping deadlines for holiday packages Last days to ship U.S. to U.S. Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri FedEx Express® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Same Day® FO, PO, SO, Extra Hours 2Day & 2Day AM FedEx Express Saver® FedEx 1Day® Freight 12/19 FedEx 2Day® Freight FedEx 3Day® Freight FedEx Ground® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Ground® Contiguous US FedEx Ground® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Home Delivery® Contiguous US FedEx Home Delivery® Alaska and Hawaii FedEx Ground® Economy FedEx Freight® 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx Freight® Priority FedEx Freight® Economy FedEx Freight® Direct International Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri U.S. to Canada 12/6 12/7 12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20 12/21 12/22 12/23 12/24 FedEx® International Next Flight FedEx International First® FedEx International Priority® FedEx International Priority Distribution® FedEx International Economy® U.S. -
Global Shipping Transaction Guide Important Information
v 2500 Global Shipping Transaction Guide Important Information Payment A shipment given to FedEx with incorrect information is not eligible for refund under any FedEx money-back guarantee. FedEx may suspend applicable You must remit payment in accordance with the FedEx Service Guide, tariff money-back guarantee in the event of automation device failure or if the or pricing agreement, or other terms or instructions provided to you by FedEx automation device becomes inoperative. from time to time. You may not withhold payment on any shipments because of equipment failure or for the failure of FedEx to repair or replace any Confidential and Proprietary equipment. The information contained in this guide is confidential and proprietary to Inaccurate Invoices FedEx. No part of this guide may be distributed or disclosed in any form to any third party without written permission of FedEx. This document is If you generate an inaccurate invoice, then FedEx will bill or refund to you the provided and its use is subject to the terms and conditions of the FedEx difference according to the FedEx Service Guide, service or pricing agreement, PowerShip Placement Agreement. Any conflict between the applicable FedEx or other terms or instructions provided to you by FedEx from time to time. A Service Guide and this document is controlled by the FedEx Service Guide. request for refund on a FedEx® shipment must be made in accordance with the applicable FedEx Service Guide, service or pricing agreement, or terms or © 1998–2011 FedEx. Unpublished. instructions provided by FedEx periodically. FedEx Ship Manager® Software PassPort, Global Shipping Transaction Guide 2 Contents 1 Overview ..................................................................................... -
RLA Or NLRA? Fedex and UPS Follow the Money Trail
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW RLA or NLRA? FedEx and UPS Follow the Money Trail By Frank N. Wilner FexEx Express and UPS compete furiously in the market for expedited pickup and delivery service. Labor costs are a significant component of total costs for both competitors, but they compete on different playing fields: UPS ground-service employees are covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which permits union organizing at individual terminal locations, while FedEx Express ground-service employees are subject to the Railway Labor Act (RLA), which requires union organizing on a systemwide basis—making it much more difficult to call a strike. UPS has failed on numerous occasions to shift its ground-service employees to RLA coverage and now is aligned with the Teamsters to bring FedEx employees under the NLRA. FedEx Express wants its nonunionized ground-service employees to remain under the RLA; however, legislation has passed the House to bring them under the ambit of the NLRA, and Senate action is expected in early 2010. “We are a freight service with 550-mile per hour delivery trucks” – FedEx founder, Fred Smith1 The Railway Labor Act (RLA) of 19262 is an 83-year-old statute that is distinctly different, in crucial respects, from the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935.3 The RLA was the nation’s first law guaranteeing workers the right to organize and choose their own bargaining representa- tives. The RLA governs the labor-management relations of railroads and airlines (the latter added in 1936), whereas A Brief Introduction to the Players the NLRA governs other private-sector industries. -
A Study on Supply Chain Management of Fedex Express Transportation”
Project Dissertation Report on “A STUDY ON SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT OF FEDEX EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION” Submitted by: Ankesh Kumar (2K18/MBA/103) Under the Guidance of: Mr. Yashdeep Singh Assistant Professor DELHI SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Delhi Technological University Bawana Road Delhi 110042 i DELHI SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY SHAHBAD DAULATPUR, MAIN BAWANA ROAD, DELHI -110042 Dated: 10th April 2020 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the work titled “A study on Supply Chain management of FedEx Express Transportation” submitted by Ankesh Kumar in this project report as part of 4th Semester in MBA (DSM, DTU) during January - April, 2020 was conducted under my guidance and supervision. This work is his original work to the best of my knowledge and has not been submitted anywhere else for the award of any credits / degree whatsoever. The work is satisfactory for the award of MGT-44 Term Project credits. Dr. Rajan Yadav Mr. Yashdeep Singh Head of department Assistant Professor Delhi school of Management Delhi School of Management Delhi Technological University Delhi Technological University ii STUDENT UNDERTAKING Dated: 10th May 2020 This is to undertake that the work titled “A study on Supply Chain management of FedEx Express Transportation”, Project Report is submitted as part of 4th Semester in MBA (DSM, DTU) during January-April, 2020 under the guidance of Mr. Yashdeep Singh (Asst. Prof.) is my original work to the best of my knowledge and has not been submitted anywhere else. The report has been written by me in my own words and not copied from elsewhere. Anything that appears in this report which is not original, has been duly and appropriately referred / cited / acknowledged. -
Settlement Terms, As Approved by Venus’S Counsel and Class Counsel, Subject to Approval by The
Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page1 of 29 1 LEXINGTON LAW GROUP Mark N. Todzo, State Bar No. 168389 2 Abigail Blodgett, State Bar No. 278813 503 Divisadero Street 3 San Francisco, CA 94117 Telephone: (415) 913-7800 4 Facsimile: (415) 759-4112 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 HALUNEN LAW Melissa W. Wolchansky (pro hac vice pending) 7 Charles D. Moore (pro hac vice pending) 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 1650 8 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 605-4098 9 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 [email protected] 10 [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Classes 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 REBEKAH BAHARESTAN and JENA Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MCINTYRE, on behalf of themselves and all 17 others similarly situated, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 18 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 19 v. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 20 Date: November 3, 2015 VENUS LABORATORIES, INC., dba EARTH Time: 10:00 a.m. 21 FRIENDLY PRODUCTS, INC., Location: Courtroom E Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ....................................................................................... vi 3 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES .................................................................1 4 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 5 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 6 I. -
In the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CARLOS TAVERAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 3:15-cv-01550-JAM v. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Defendant. XPO LAST MILE, INC. Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EXPEDITED TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC. Third-Party Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S ASSENTED-TO MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated delivery drivers who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to standard contracts under which they were classified as independent contractors. Plaintiff alleges that XPO’s delivery contractors were actually employees, and based on this misclassification, XPO’s practice of making deductions from its delivery drivers’ pay for such things as damage claims and worker’s compensation violates the Connecticut wage payments laws. Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-71e. The parties have reached a non-reversionary class action settlement for $950,000. 1 Case 3:15-cv-01550-JAM Document 120 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 45 On March 17, 2017, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, certified a class of individuals who performed delivery services for Defendant XPO Last Mile, Inc. in Connecticut pursuant to contracts that class them as independent contractors, and authorized notice to the class. ECF No. 115. Plaintiff now seeks the Court’s final approval of the proposed class action settlement at the final settlement approval hearing scheduled for July 7, 2017. -
Washington DC Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Shipping Instructions
Washington DC Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Shipping Instructions PREPARING YOUR SHIPMENT FedEx Office is committed to providing you with an outstanding experience during your stay. All guest and event packages be- ing shipped to the property must follow the address label standards (illustrated below) to prevent package routing delays. Please schedule your shipment(s) to arrive four days prior to the event start date to avoid additional storage fees. Use the name of the recipient who will be on-site to receive and sign for the package(s). Please do not address shipments using property employee names, unless the items are specifically for their use (e.g., hotel specifications, rooming lists, or signed documents); this includes arranging for deliveries to all areas on the property. If a package has not been picked up by the recipient and no contact information is provided, the package will be returned to the sender, who will be responsible for all additional shipping fees. For more information on package retention, the Return to Sender process, or to schedule package deliveries, please contact the FedEx Office Business Center at 202.986.4028. Package deliver- ies should only be scheduled after the recipient has completed the check-in process. PACKAGE LABELING STANDARDS AND FEDEX OFFICE CONTACT (Guest Name) (Guest Cell Number) FedEx Office Business Center Operating Hours c/o FedEx Office at Washington DC Marriott Wardman Washington DC Marriott Mon – Fri: 7:00am - 7:00pm Park Hotel Wardman Park Hotel Saturday: Closed 2600 Woodley Road NW 2600 Woodley Road NW Sunday: Closed Washington, DC, 20008 Washington, DC 20008 (Convention / Conference / Group / Event Name) Phone: 202.986.4028 Box ____ of ____ Fax: 202.986.4728 Email: [email protected] SHIPMENTS WITH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Meeting and event planners, exhibitors and attendees are encouraged to contact FedEx Office in advance of shipping their items to Washington DC Marriott Wardman Park Hotel with any specific questions. -
Fedex Corp Proxy
4AUG200523421009 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held September 28, 2009 To Our Stockholders: We cordially invite you to attend the 2009 annual meeting of FedEx’s stockholders. The meeting will take place in The Grand Ballroom at The Peabody Hotel, 149 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, on Monday, September 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. local time. We look forward to your attendance either in person or by proxy. The purpose of the meeting is to: 1. Elect twelve directors; 2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010; 3. Act upon four stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting; and 4. Transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on August 3, 2009, may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. By order of the Board of Directors, 4AUG200523413606 CHRISTINE P. RICHARDS Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary August 17, 2009 HOW TO VOTE: Please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, or vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. The enclosed return envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States. REDUCE MAILING COSTS: If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year’s proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc. -
2017 Global Citizenship Report Csr.Fedex.Com
2017 Global Citizenship Report csr.fedex.com Delivering is our business. Delivering positive impact is our responsibility. Empowering people to deliver it forward is our passion. Delivering for a better world Every day, in countless ways, FedEx empowers team members, customers, change-makers and community advocates to take action. From job opportunities to safer, more sustainable communities, these everyday heroes deliver it forward. Meet them in this report and on our website. 3 2017 FedEx Global Citizenship Report Table of Contents Our Company Economy Environment People GRI CHAIRMAN’S ECONOMY LETTER Delivering Opportunities Pages 13–27 Chairman and CEO, Frederick W. Smith Pages 4–5 ENVIRONMENT Delivering for a Sustainable World GOALS AND Pages 28–45 PROGRESS Page 6 PEOPLE Delivering for Our Team OUR COMPANY Pages 46–55 Delivering Business Responsibly Pages 7–12 GRI Pages 56–67 About This Report Our annual global citizenship report covers Because TNT Express was acquired late in FedEx enterprise-wide strategies, goals, fiscal year 2016, that entity is not included programs and progress across three key in any of the reported data. pillars: Economy, Environment and People. This report references the Global Data in this report covers each of our Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) G4 framework operating companies and all geographies and contains Standard Disclosures in our 2016 fiscal year, which ended May from the GRI Sustainability Reporting 31, 2016, unless otherwise noted. Guidelines, which are listed in this index. 4 2017 FedEx Global Citizenship Report Chairman's Letter Our Company Economy Environment People GRI WHAT CONNECTS US MAKES US STRONGER Few companies have the privilege of almost instantly. -
Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State ( ) SPECIFICATION
USPS-B-3200 - Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State 2015-04-20 Rev H.docx H Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State ( ) SPECIFICATION USPS-B-3200 CAGE CODE: 27085 Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State Approval Block PROJECT ENGINEER John E. Werntz 12-3-2014 PROJECT MANAGER Himesh A. Patel 04-20-2015 APPROVING AUTHORITY Stephen M. Dearing 04-20-2015 CM STAFF Saundra Ashby 12-3-2014 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DOCUMENT THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH USPS-STD-11 2015 United States Postal Service Rev H 4/20/2015 Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State SP Revision History Revision Date Notes Author Rev – 07/08/2005 RELEASED/EC7817-001 D. Milligan Rev A 02/27/2006 SEE EC8540-001 D. MILLIGAN Rev B 03/14/2006 SEE EC8598-001 D. MILLIGAN Rev C 02/16/2007 SEE EC8802-001 S. REIDEL Rev D 07/24/2007 SEE EC9084-001 S. REIDEL Rev E 10/30/2007 SEE EC9179-001 S. REIDEL Rev F 05/13/2008 SEE EC9417-001 M. CHOINIERE Rev G 03/11/2009 SEE ECN400039 K. GOYAL ECR 502161 – ECN 403717 Incorporate Postal IMb formats (pIMb and rIMb) as J Werntz Rev H 04/20/2105 well as the IMb with Origin IMb Tracing Service IMb M Forna Update BI and STID valid values L Guernsey Format for STD 11 USPS-B-3200 CAGE CODE: 27085 i 4/20/2015 Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State Rev H Intelligent Mail Barcode 4-State SP Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 ® 1.1 Scope of the Intelligent Mail Barcode (IMb) ...............................................................................................1 -
Postal Service 39 CFR Part 111 Changes to the Domestic Mail Manual to Implement Confirm Service; Final Rule
Thursday, August 15, 2002 Part IV Postal Service 39 CFR Part 111 Changes To the Domestic Mail Manual To Implement Confirm Service; Final Rule VerDate Aug<2,>2002 16:44 Aug 14, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\15AUR4.SGM pfrm17 PsN: 15AUR4 53454 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 158 / Thursday, August 15, 2002 / Rules and Regulations POSTAL SERVICE seq.), filed a Request for a recommended comments and recommendations for decision by the Postal Rate Commission improving and expanding Confirm, and 39 CFR Part 111 (PRC) on the proposed classification and for ensuring that the service meets the [Docket No. MC 2002–1] fees for Confirm, a new service using a business needs and the operational uniquely identifying mailer-applied requirements of the mailing industry at Changes to the Domestic Mail Manual barcode called PLANET Code. Using large. Moreover, the Postal Service has To Implement Confirm Service these barcodes, along with the continued to solicit recommendations appropriate delivery address POSTNET from the mailing industry for AGENCY: Postal Service. barcodes, enables a participating mailer enhancements to the infrastructure ACTION: Final rule. to identify where and when outgoing supporting this subscriber-based automation-compatible mail and service. The recommendations coming SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth the incoming automation-compatible reply from actual customer use and testing of Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) mail are scanned in various postal the whole Confirm system have greatly standards adopted