Full Book PDF Download
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
View Annual Report
GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS OFFICES New York, New York Bogota, Colombia 800.223.6448 Boston, Massachusetts REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS Buenos Aires, Argentina Hong Kong, China Dubai, United Arab Emirates +852 3664 8800 Frankfurt, Germany London, United Kingdom Houston, Texas +44 20 3214 9000 Los Angeles, California Tokyo, Japan Melbourne, Australia +81 3 5218 1930 Milan, Italy Palm Beach, Florida ADDITIONAL PRIMARY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT CENTERS Paris, France Atlanta, Georgia Piscataway, New Jersey Chicago, Illinois San Francisco, California Dallas, Texas Seoul, South Korea The Hague, Netherlands Shanghai, China Singapore Taipei, Taiwan Tampa, Florida Toronto, Canada Totowa, New Jersey Wilmington, Delaware Zurich, Switzerland Neuberger Berman Group LLC 605 ird Avenue New York, NY 10158-3698 800.223.6448 L0317 04/15 ©2015 Neuberger Berman Group LLC. All rights reserved. www.nb.com NB002_2014_AR_Cover_QCR_Offset_042715_UG_R2.indd 1 5/3/15 8:21 AM Neuberger Berman is a private, independent, employee-owned investment firm, managing equity, fixed income, private equity and hedge fund portfolios for institutions, advisors and individuals. Our presence is worldwide, with offices in 18 countries and more than 2,000 professionals focused on serving global clients. Named by Pensions & Investments as a 2013 and 2014 Best Place to Work in Money Management, our firm is tenured, stable and long-term in focus. We foster an investment culture of fundamental research and independent thinking, in place since our founding in 1939. NB002_2014_AR_Cover_QCR_Offset_042715_UG_R1.indd 2 5/1/15 10:16 AM OUR MISSION IS TO PARTNER WITH OUR 1 CLIENTS TO ACHIEVE 1,649 79 % THEIR UNIQUE RESEARCH MEETINGS OF ALL WITH COMPANY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT TEAMS NB PRIVATE OBJECTIVES. -
INVESTMENT VENDORS the Following Is a Listing of the Investment Managers, Custodians, and Consultants That Serve the Massachusetts Public Pension Systems
INVESTMENT VENDORS The following is a listing of the investment managers, custodians, and consultants that serve the Massachusetts public pension systems. The listing is based on information supplied by the retirement boards. RETIREMENT BOARD INVESTMENT VENDORS ADAMS • Capital Research and Management • Granite Investment Advisors Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust AMESBURY • PRIT ANDOVER • PRIT ARLINGTON • PRIT • Wilshire Associates Inc. Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust ATTLEBORO • Boston Advisors, LLC • Herndon Capital Management, LLC • PRIT Custodian: People’s United Bank • Daruma Capital Management, LLC • Invesco Core Real Estate USA, LP • Regions Timberland Consultant: Dahab Associates Inc. • Fidelity Institutional Asset Management • Invesco National Trust Company • State Street Global Advisors • Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC • Orleans Capital Management Corp. • Wells Capital Management Inc. • Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. BARNSTABLE COUNTY • Intercontinental Capital Management, LLC • PRIT • UBS Realty Investors, LLC BELMONT • AEW Capital Management, LP • Loomis Sayles & Company • RhumbLine Advisers Custodian: State Street Bank & Trust • Atlanta Capital • Pacific Investment Management Company, LLC • Rothschild Asset Management Inc. Consultant: New England Pension • Harbourvest Partners, LLC • PRIT • Scout Capital Management, LLC Consultants BERKSHIRE COUNTY • PRIT BEVERLY • PRIT BLUE HILLS REGIONAL • PRIT BOSTON (CITY) • 57 Stars, LLC • EnTrust Partners, LLC • Permal Asset Management, Inc. Custodian: State -
Lehman Brothers Investment Management
Lehman Brothers Investment Management Confidential FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LBEX-DOCID 3177820022907 LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. Investment Management (IMD) Background Lehman Brothers has built an investment management business grounded in a: – Leading asset management franchise expanded with the acquisitions of Neuberger Berman (“NB”), the Crossroads Group and Lincoln Capital Fixed Income (each acquired in 2003) – Strong Private Equity (“PE”) business that dates back to 1984 and is growing rapidly – Highly productive high-net-worth brokerage/wealth advisory business (“Private Investment Management” or “PIM”) The target business model has been a fully scaled, high margin business that delivers best-in-class products and services to institutional, intermediary and individual clients around the world The business currently reflects a mix of: 1. Profitable ‘developed’ businesses that are highly competitive in their respective segments 2. Segments that are ‘developing’ toward a larger scale that will expand margins and drive profit growth 3. ‘Start-up’ seeded initiatives with high growth potential 1 Confidential FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LBEX-DOCID 317782 LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. IMD Overview Overview Investment Management Division Note: Presentation excludes 196 person – ~ 3,480 employees middle market institutional sales force – 40 locations worldwide – AUM of $279Bn(1) IMD Corporate ~ 50 employees IMD Infrastructure ~ 900 employees Asset Management Alternatives - Private Equity Private Investment Management(2) ~ 1,170 employees ~ 450 employees ~ 910 employees $23Bn in AUM; $8Bn 2008P fundraising 366 highly productive Investment Representatives (IRs) focused on HNW $114Bn in Equities AUM Seven asset classes wealth management Developed 30+ investment teams, 109 portfolio – Distribution of Asset Management and managers and 95 research analysts Merchant Venture Private Equity products Alternatives (ex. -
Lehman Brothers
Lehman Brothers Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Pink Sheets: LEHMQ, former NYSE ticker symbol LEH) (pronounced / ˈliːm ə n/ ) was a global financial services firm which, until declaring bankruptcy in 2008, participated in business in investment banking, equity and fixed-income sales, research and trading, investment management, private equity, and private banking. It was a primary dealer in the U.S. Treasury securities market. Its primary subsidiaries included Lehman Brothers Inc., Neuberger Berman Inc., Aurora Loan Services, Inc., SIB Mortgage Corporation, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Eagle Energy Partners, and the Crossroads Group. The firm's worldwide headquarters were in New York City, with regional headquarters in London and Tokyo, as well as offices located throughout the world. On September 15, 2008, the firm filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection following the massive exodus of most of its clients, drastic losses in its stock, and devaluation of its assets by credit rating agencies. The filing marked the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.[2] The following day, the British bank Barclays announced its agreement to purchase, subject to regulatory approval, Lehman's North American investment-banking and trading divisions along with its New York headquarters building.[3][4] On September 20, 2008, a revised version of that agreement was approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James M. Peck.[5] During the week of September 22, 2008, Nomura Holdings announced that it would acquire Lehman Brothers' franchise in the Asia Pacific region, including Japan, Hong Kong and Australia.[6] as well as, Lehman Brothers' investment banking and equities businesses in Europe and the Middle East. -
The Global Economy, Economic Crisis, and White-Collar Crime
Contents Volume 9 • Issue 3 • August 2010 SPECIAL ISSUE The Global Economy, Economic Crisis, and White-Collar Crime EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION White-collar crime and the Great Recession .......................................................................429 Neal Shover, Peter Grabosky WALLS OF SECRECY AND SILENCE RESEARCH ARTICLE. Walls of secrecy and silence: The Madoff case ..........................................435 and cartels in the construction industry Henk van de Bunt POLICY ESSAY. Secrecy, silence, and corporate crime reforms ..................................................455 William S. Laufer POLICY ESSAY. Silent or invisible? Governments and corporate financial crimes .....................467 John Minkes POLICY ESSAY. How to effectively get crooks like Bernie Madoff in Dutch .............................475 Henry N. Pontell, Gilbert Geis POLICY ESSAY. Getting our attention .......................................................................................483 Nancy Reichman SERIOUS TAX FRAUD AND NONCOMPLIANCE RESEARCH ARTICLE. Serious tax fraud and noncompliance: A review of evidence ....................493 on the differential impact of criminal and noncriminal proceedings Michael Levi POLICY ESSAY. Criminal prosecution within responsive regulatory practice ............................515 Valerie Braithwaite POLICY ESSAY. Fairness matters—more than deterrence: .........................................................525 Class bias and the limits of deterrence Paul Leighton POLICY ESSAY. Serious tax noncompliance: Motivation -
Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite?: a Flesh-And-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System
LEO E. STRINE, JR. Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite?: A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System A U T H 0 R. Chief Justice, Delaware Supreme Court; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law, Harvard Law School; Senior Fellow, Harvard Program on Corporate Governance; and Henry Crown Fellow, Aspen Institute. The author is grateful to Christine Balaguer, Yulia Buyanin, Peter Fritz, Alexandra Joyce, Fay Krewer, and Peggy Pfeiffer for their help. The author also thanks Bill Anderson, David Berger, Jim Cheek, Joele Frank, Ron Gilson, Andy Green, Jim Griffin, David Katz, Rob Kindler, Lou Kling, Don Langevoort, Travis Laster, Marty Lipton, Ted Mirvis, Bob Mundheim, Sabastian Niles, Eileen Nugent, Miguel Padro, Frank Partnoy, Roberta Romano, Bill Savitt, Brian Schorr, Randall Thomas, Antonio Weiss, and Josh Zoffer for the excellent feedback and incisive com- ments on the draft. 1870 WHO BLEEDS WHEN THE WOLVES BITE? Few topics are sexier among commentators on corporate governance now than whether activist hedge funds are good for, a danger to, or of no real con- sequence to public corporations and the people who depend upon them. As befits tradition in this space, catchy pejoratives caught on, and the phenome- non of concerted action by hedge funds and other more traditional money managers, such as actively traded mutual funds who often encourage and sup- port the investment strategy of the alpha wolf, to influence public companies' business plans has been deemed "wolf pack activism." For a term so evocative of dangers to the flesh, the debates over wolf packs, and more generally the topic of hedge fund activism, have a surprisingly blood- less quality-one that uses abstraction and distancing to obscure what may be really at stake. -
A Flesh-And-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System
ISSN 1936-5349 (print) ISSN 1936-5357 (online) HARVARD JOHN M. OLIN CENTER FOR LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS WHO BLEEDS WHEN THE WOLVES BITE? A FLESH-AND-BLOOD PERSPECTIVE ON HEDGE FUND ACTIVISM AND OUR STRANGE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SYSTEM Leo E. Strine, Jr. Yale Law Journal, Vol. 126, Pg. 1870, 2017 Discussion Paper No. 899 04/2017 Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 This paper can be downloaded without charge from: The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/ The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2921901 This paper is also Discussion Paper 2017-04 of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance University of Pennsylvania Law School ILE INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND ECONOMICS A Joint Research Center of the Law School, the Wharton School, and the Department of Economics in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania RESEARCH PAPER NO. 17-5 Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System Leo E. Strine, Jr. GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE - SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE; HARVARD LAW SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2921901 LEO E. STRINE, JR. Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite?: A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System author. Chief Justice, Delaware Supreme Court; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law, Harvard Law School; Senior Fellow, Harvard Program on Corporate Governance; and Henry Crown Fellow, Aspen Institute. -
Lehman Brothers Investment Management
Lehman Brothers Investment Management Confidential FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LBEX-DOCID 3177820022907 LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. Investment Management (IMD) Background Lehman Brothers has built an investment management business grounded in a: – Leading asset management franchise expanded with the acquisitions of Neuberger Berman (“NB”), the Crossroads Group and Lincoln Capital Fixed Income (each acquired in 2003) – Strong Private Equity (“PE”) business that dates back to 1984 and is growing rapidly – Highly productive high-net-worth brokerage/wealth advisory business (“Private Investment Management” or “PIM”) The target business model has been a fully scaled, high margin business that delivers best-in-class products and services to institutional, intermediary and individual clients around the world The business currently reflects a mix of: 1. Profitable ‘developed’ businesses that are highly competitive in their respective segments 2. Segments that are ‘developing’ toward a larger scale that will expand margins and drive profit growth 3. ‘Start-up’ seeded initiatives with high growth potential 1 Confidential FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LBEX-DOCID 317782 LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. IMD Overview Overview Investment Management Division Note: Presentation excludes 196 person – ~ 3,480 employees middle market institutional sales force – 40 locations worldwide – AUM of $279Bn(1) IMD Corporate ~ 50 employees IMD Infrastructure ~ 900 employees Asset Management Alternatives - Private Equity Private Investment Management(2) ~ 1,170 employees ~ 450 employees ~ 910 employees $23Bn in AUM; $8Bn 2008P fundraising 366 highly productive Investment Representatives (IRs) focused on HNW $114Bn in Equities AUM Seven asset classes wealth management Developed 30+ investment teams, 109 portfolio – Distribution of Asset Management and managers and 95 research analysts Merchant Venture Private Equity products Alternatives (ex. -
Founded 1996
Founded 1996 2016 Annual Report GREENHILL IS A UNIQUE INVESTMENT BANKING FIRM ADVISING CLIENTS IS OUR ONLY BUSINESS • NO INVESTING, TRADING, LENDING OR UNDERWRITING • NO PRODUCTS TO SELL / NO CONFLICTS WE ADVISE ON A WIDE RANGE of MATTERS • M&A, FINANCING, RESTRUCTURING AND CApiTAL RAISING WE HAVE SUBSTANTIAL TEAMS IN ALL MAJOR MARKETS • NORTH AMERICA, EUROPE, AUSTRALIA, ASIA AND SOUTH AMERICA • MANAGING DIRECTORS AVERAGE ~25 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 1 HISTORY of GREENHILL Founded as a M&A firm in New York 1996 1998 Opens London office to serve European clients and facilitate cross-border work Establishes office in Frankfurt 2000 2001 Establishes Financial Restructuring practice Completes initial public offering 2004 2005 Establishes office in Dallas Establishes office in Toronto 2006 Establishes offices in San Francisco and Chicago 2008 Enters Capital Advisory business Establishes office in Tokyo Establishes office in Houston 2009 Launches Real Estate Capital Advisory practice 2010 Expands to Australia with acquisition of Caliburn Establishes office in Hong Kong 2011 2012 Establishes office in Stockholm Establishes office in São Paulo 2013 Expands Capital Advisory capabilities 2015 through acquisition of Cogent Partners 20th anniversary of the Firm 2016 Note: In addition to the above history of its advisory business, Greenhill was in the private equity investment business from 2000-2009 2 FASTEST GROWING ADVISORY FIRM IN 2016 2016 Advisory Revenue % Increase Greenhill 29% Evercore 27% PJT 23% Credit Suisse 15% Houlihan Lokey 15% Morgan Stanley 13% Moelis 11% Jefferies 3% Lazard 2% JP Morgan (1%) UBS (4%) Citigroup (9%) Deutsche Bank (15%) Goldman Sachs (16%) Bank of America Merrill Lynch (16%) Note: Foreign revenues converted to USD using average period exchange rate Source: Company filings and releases 3 LETTER TO OUR CLIENTS, STOCKHOLDERS AND COLLEAGUES reenhill is a leading independent on our Firm and key competitors, our advisory advisory firm. -
NWR Annual Report and Accounts 2009
New World Resources N.V. Jachthavenweg 109h 1081 KM Amsterdam The Netherlands www.newworldresources.eu Resources World New N.V. Annual Report and Accounts 2009 NWR Annual Report and Accounts 2009 The power of efficiency Group Overview Business Review Corporate Governance Financial Statements 01 Highlights 08 Chairman’s statement 54 Corporate governance 83 General information 02 NWR at a glance – our operations 10 Board and Senior Management 84 Directors’ report 04 NWR at a glance – our presence 14 Executive Director’s statement 69 Certain Relationships and Related 88 Consolidated income statement 06 Strategy – our focus 16 Driving efficiency and investment Party Transactions 89 Consolidated statement of The Productivity Optimisation 74 Material Contracts comprehensive income Programme 2010 (‘POP 2010’) 77 Directors’ Statement of 91 Consolidated statement of financial 18 Management Q&A Responsibility position 22 Industry overview 78 Remuneration Report 91 Notes to the consolidated financial 26 Business review statements 26 A cost effective and reliable 148 Non-consolidated income statement supplier 149 Non-consolidated statement 30 Investing in our future of comprehensive income 36 Expanding our reserve base 150 Non-consolidated statement 38 Sustainable development review of financial position 40 Delivering value through people 151 Non-consolidated statement 44 Financial review of changes in equity 48 Delivering value through technology 152 Non-consolidated cash flow statement 50 Risk management 153 Notes to non-consolidated financial statements 167 To the Annual General Meeting 168 Shareholder Information 171 Ancillary Information for Shareholders New World Resources N.V. (‘NWR’ or the ‘Company’)1 is Central Europe’s leading hard coal and coke producer. -
Embattled Ceos
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 10-3-2008 Embattled CEOs Marcel Kahan New York University Edward B. Rock University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Repository Citation Kahan, Marcel and Rock, Edward B., "Embattled CEOs" (2008). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 235. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/235 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Embattled CEOs by Marcel Kahan and Edward Rock October 2008 We would like to thank Bill Allen, Jennifer Hill, Margaret Blair, Randall Thomas, Scott Wornow, and participants in workshops at Fordham Law School and Vanderbilt Law School for comments and Daniela Fischel and Phillip Won for research assistance. INTRODUCTION In this paper, we present a straightforward thesis. The chief executive officers of publicly-held corporations in the United States are losing power. They are losing power to a board of directors that increasingly consists of both nominally and substantively independent directors. And, perhaps more so, they are losing power to shareholders. This loss of power is recent (say, since 2000) and gradual, but nevertheless represents a significant move away from the imperial CEO who was surrounded by a hand-picked board and lethargic shareholders. -
Lehman Brothers Private Equity Partners Limited in the Form of Shares Or Restricted Depositary Shares
OFFERING MEMORANDUM 50,000,000 Shares Lehman Brothers Private Equity Partners Limited In the form of Shares or Restricted Depositary Shares This is a global offering of 50,000,000 class A ordinary shares (the “Shares”) of Lehman Brothers Private Equity Partners Limited, a closed-end investment company registered under the laws of Guernsey. The global offering consists of a private placement in the Netherlands and in other countries. In the United States, restricted depositary shares (“RDSs”), each representing one Share, will be offered to certain “qualified institutional buyers” (as defined in Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”)). Additionally, as part of the global offering, we will directly offer RDSs in a private placement, with the managers acting as placement agents, to certain “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501(a) under the U.S. Securities Act). Simultaneously with the closing of the global offering, affiliates of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman Brothers”) will purchase $100 million of our Shares (in the form of RDSs) at the offering price. Additionally, in connection with the global offering, Lehman Brothers has agreed to sell to us a portfolio of private equity assets (the “Initial Investments”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $260.5 million. We will also assume related unfunded commitments aggregating approximately $354.1 million. The purchase price for the Initial Investments will be their aggregate net asset value as of December 31, 2006 plus the amount of drawdowns on the related unfunded commitments, minus distributions in respect of such assets, plus an interest factor.