Facing India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Facing India READ INSIDE: NORTHERN HEART «LESSONS WE OF VIKRAMADITYA LEARNED...» Phases of an unprecedented Frigates for India: experience project to overcome difficulties FEATURE ONE: FACING INDIA 1(9) 2012 On March, 1988, state company “Sudoexport”is founded on the basis of the foreign trade arm of the Shipbuilding Industry Ministry of the USSR established in 1968 (Minsudprom). In accordance with Presidential Order No. 696 of June 9, 2010 “On the development of “United Shipbuilding Corporation’’, “Sudoexport” is integrated in United Shipbuilding Corporation. The order specifies that foreign trade operations on exporting and importing ships and other vessels, ship and other equipment, parts and materials, and leasing, are designated as priority areas. “Sudoexport” acts as a middleman for the Russian shipbuilding industry working with foreign clients and works on importing equipment and parts for shipbuilding enterprises, as well as implementing in Russia advanced foreign and domestic technologies for the shipbuilding industry. In its many years of experience, “Sudoexport” has earned a reputation as a reliable partner for many successful shipbuilding and repair factories, as well as for shipping companies from India, Germany, Norway, Bulgaria, Vietnam, Egypt, and other countries. We aim to maintain harmonious relations with our clients, keeping them as transparent and as reliable as possible. 11, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya 123242, Moscow, Russia Tel.: +7 (495) 727 30 52 Fax: +7 (495) 727 30 53 E-mail: info sudoexport.ru @ www.sudoexport.com Dear readers! This issue of the corporate magazine of the United Ship- building Corporation (USC) is mostly focused on the themes of Russian-Indian cooperation in the naval sphere. It is symbolic that it is issued on the eve of an important event — 50th anni- versary of the beginning of the military and technical coopera- tion between India and the USSR — which throughout decades became a major factor of not only the world arms market, but also of the global politics. Fruitful military and technical cooperation of our countries that had time and again played an important role in preventing threats and effective resolution of armed conflicts acquired a new quality in early ХХI century. A high degree of mutual un- derstanding that had formed during years of close partnership, on the working level, too, and mutual trust allow Russia and India to change the previous cooperation in the format buyer- seller, customer-manufacturer in favour of joint development of advanced weapons and military equipment. This particular format of modern privileged partnership gives our countries the synergy able to provide a breakthrough to the leading positions in a number of areas of military and technical cooperation, including joint design and production of effective naval hardware, in order to meet the requirements of the national armed forces, as well as for successful competition on the world market. We at USC are sure that further development of the strategic partnership relations between our nations, including the naval shipbuilding sphere, will make it possible to protect the national sovereignty and implement national interests of India and Rus- sia in the ХХI century in the most efficient and mutually ben- eficially manner. Roman Trotsenko President, United Shipbuilding Corporation CONTENT 14 48 40 34 4_ NEWS 27_ FORECAST: NO CALM 48_ THUNDERBOLTS FOR THE COUNTRY 10_ SHARING THE SAME GOALS 34_ NORTHERN HEART OF GODS OF VIKRAMADITYA 14_INDISSOLUBLE UNION 52_ LOOKING DEEP 37_ SCHOOL 20_ «LESSONS WE LEARNED...» OF THE SEA WOLF 26_ SUDOEXPORT — INDIA: 40_ PARTNERSHIP RELIABLE partnership FOR FRIENDSHIP’S SAKE «USC. STRENGTH Address e-mail: [email protected] AND POWER AT SEA» magazine 11/1 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, website: www.oaoosk.ru №1(9) 2012 Moscow,123242 Russia Published by USC JSС Tel.: +7 (495) 617-33 00 Fax: +7 (495) 617-34 00 President Roman Trotsenko NEWS USC AND MMK SPAIN LOBBYING St. Petersburg, the following documents were signed in the this involved their license construction at one of the domes- BECAME PARTNERS WARSHIP DELIVERY presence of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin: tic shipyards. The details of the signed contract have not yet been dis- MOSCOW, 29 November 2011. JSC United Shipbuilding TO BRAZIL — a contract to build a 25-MW ice-breaker (completion date: closed. Corporation (USC) and JSC Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel 29 November 2011 (CAWAT). Executive director of Spanish October 2015); The delivery of the frigates is the biggest joint project be- Works (MMK) signed a memorandum of strategic shipbuilder Navantia Louis Cacho completed his visit to Bra- — contracts to build three 16-MW ice-breakers (completion tween Russia and Vietnam in the segment of major surface cooperation. zil, during which he held talks with the Ministry of Defense, dates: May, August and October 2015); ships. In 2006, Rosoboronexport signed a US$ 350 million Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Navy and defense industry of- — a subcontract to build a 25-MW ice-breaker with the contract with the Vietnamese Navy to supply two Project The parties agreed to cooperate in ficials of the largest South American state to support the pro- completion date set at October 2015; 11661 Gepard-3.9 frigates. The developer of the project is the science and technology on the existing posal in the framework of PROSUPER (Programa de Obtencao — an agreement on preparations for the construction of a Zelenodolsk PKB Design Bureau, while the manufacturing and new types of products in ship- de Meios de Superficie) program. series of 60-MW nuclear-powered ice-breakers; contractor is JSC Zelenodolsk Shipyard. building, as well as optimize the chains — an agreement on the use of Baltic Shipyard’s capacities to The modified version of the Project 11661 Gepard-3.9 has de- to supply steel products from the MMK In addition, the CEO of Navantia met with the Spanish Ambas- build the floating hull parts for two Mistral assault landing rived from the Tatarstan patrol ship. The Vietnamese Gepard site to USC enterprises. sador to Brazil to coordinate the efforts supporting the com- ships. ship incorporates stealth technology. It is armed with the «As you know, the shipbuilding indus- pany’s proposals with the diplomatic mission. Palma-SU missile/gun air defense system with a new elec- try is perhaps the most metal-intensive It should be recalled that in the first phase of the PROSUPER tro-optical guidance system and the Uran missile system. sector. In this regard, the United Ship- program, Brazil seeking to increase the capabilities to protect RUSSIAN-BUILT FRIGATE By now, both the Project 11661 Gepard-3.9 frigates have been building Corporation believes that the its offshore oil fields plans to acquire 11 combatant ships — FOR INDIAN NAVY delivered to the Vietnamese Navy. strategic cooperation between Russian shipbuilders and the five 6000-ton frigates, five 1800-ton offshore patrol vessels and Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works will promote healthy com- one replenishment oiler (AOR) to be built by the winner of the COMPLETED TRIALS petition in the domestic ship’s steel market, which is espe- tender in the country in conjunction with Brazilian companies. MOSCOW, 7 December 2011 (RIA Novosti). The first of the cially important in conditions when shipbuilding orders have According to Navantia, its proposal features two major ben- three frigates ordered by the Indian Navy has successfully been steadily growing in Russia,» - said Roman Trotsenko, efits: the availability of proven projects for the three classes passed the final trials before its handover to the Indian side. President of the United Shipbuilding Corporation. In turn, of ships (frigate, POV and AOR ship) required for the Brazilian Boris Dubrovsky, Director General of Magnitogorsk Iron & Navy, as well as vast experience in transfer of the construc- «In fact, the final testing phase of the Project 11356 frigate Teg Steel Works, said, «Possessing the most modern plate roll- tion technologies to a number of countries, including Australia, (Saber) has finished. Next, the process of delivery and accept- ing processes at its Mill 5000 facility, MMK intends to devel- India and Norway. ance of the first of three frigates by the Indian side will be- op the delivery market for shipbuilders. Such an opportunity Navantia has already secured the full support of the project gin,»- said Sergei Mikhailov, spokesman for the Yantar Baltic is available now, and we are pleased with the agreements from Spain’s Government, Ministry of Defense, and Navy. The Shipyard. According to him, the frigate is to be handed over to reached with USC. MMK is able to fully meet the needs of obligations of the parties were fixed in the Memorandum of the Indian Navy in April next year. the Russian shipbuilding industry, which will soon become Understanding signed in December 2010 by the Brazilian and The contract to build the second batch of the three frigates the locomotive of the domestic economy.” Spanish Ministries of Defense. was signed on 14 July 2007 in New Delhi. Under the first con- Project 11661 frigates are designed to search, detect tract signed in 1997, frigates Tabar (Hatchet), Trishul (Trident) and destroy surface, underwater and air targets, as well and Talvar (Sword) were constructed and handed over to the as handle escort and patrol missions. INDIA: A NEW STAGE Indian Navy. The displacement of the ships is 2100 tons, speed — 28 IN SHIPBUILDING The frigates under construction at Yantar will almost not dif- knots, sea crossing endurance — 20 days. Their arma- fer in their basic characteristics from those received by India ment suite includes two Uran-E quad ASM launchers, a DEVELOPMENT earlier. Only the armament mix of the ships was modified. In 76mm AK-176M artillery gun, two 30mm AK-630M CIWS NEW DELHI, 30 November 2011 (ARMS-TASS). India is particular, they will be armed with the Brahmos supersonic systems and 533mm torpedo tubes.
Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach
    Issue No. 1072, 27 August 2013 Articles & Other Documents: Featured Article: China Launches Three ASAT Satellites 1. Iran’s Ambassador to IAEA to Leave Post 2. Doctors Cite Deaths, Injuries from Toxin Attack in Syria as Obama, Allies Ponder Lethal Action 3. Saudi Arabia to Build 16 N. Reactors by 2030 4. Ayatollah Khamenei Renews Call for Nuclear-Free Middle East, Raps Israel 5. Assad Says Chemical Weapons Claims ‘Insult to Common Sense’ 6. Crossing Red Line on Syria will have Severe Consequences, Iran Warns U.S. 7. Iran Adds to Atom Capacity, Holds Down Stockpile Growth - Diplomats 8. Kerry Says Syrian Use of Chemical Weapons ‘Undeniable;’ U.N. Investigates 9. China's Point Man on N.K. Nukes Visits Pyongyang 10. China Launches Three ASAT Satellites 11. Second Test-Firing of Agni-V Missile Next Month 12. India all set to Lease a Second Nuclear Submarine from Russia 13. Russia to Unveil New Air Defense System at MAKS-2013 14. Missile Inspectors Visit Sites 15. Security Forces Chief Removed: Malmstrom's Lynch Relieved of Command 16. Laser Fusion Experiment Yield Record Energy 17. The END of Strategic Stability in the Asia-Pacific? 18. US Nuclear Weapons Poised for Catastrophe 19. India's Nuclear Blunder 20. Editorial: Syrian showdown 21. Obama’s Most Dangerous WMD Precedent in Syria 1. Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats and countermeasures.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Submarine Force Determinants and Prospects
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2001-06 Russia's Submarine Force determinants and prospects Tully, John M. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2551 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS RUSSIA’S SUBMARINE FORCE: DETERMINANTS AND PROSPECTS by John M. Tully June 2001 Thesis Advisor: David S. Yost Second Reader: Mikhail Tsypkin Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2001 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Russia’s Submarine Force: Determinants and Prospects 6. AUTHOR(S) John M. Tully 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024
    The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Report Price: US$4,800 (Single User) 1 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Summary “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” offers the reader detailed analysis of the global submarine market over the next ten years, and provides market size forecasts. It covers the key technological and market trends in the submarine market. The demand for global submarines is anticipated to be driven by growing regional tensions, coupled with maritime conflicts. The new technological advancements in the sector will also drive demand. The market is expected to be dominated by North America, followed by Asia Pacific and Europe. In spite of the budget sequestration measures, the US still has the highest spend in the sector and is almost equal to the spending in Asia-Pacific, which is the second largest spending region. Asia Pacific is the second largest market for submarines with major spenders in the region including China, India, Australia and Japan. “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” provides detailed analysis of the current industry size and growth expectations from 2014 to 2024, including highlights of key growth stimulators. It also benchmarks the industry against key global markets and provides a detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas. Key Findings A major finding in the report entails that the sector demand will be largely driven by increase in maritime security threats and need for replacement of obsolete submarines; leading to consistent growth in the market. The demand for submarines is also anticipated to be driven by the need for the balance of power by countries with major militaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    RCHITECTURE DURING THE EPOCH OF PETER THE AGREAT (1703-1725) Galina P. Chudesova*11G.P St Petersburg National Research University of Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics (ITMO University) St Petersburg, Russia Keywords: architecture, St Petersburg, maximaphily, Cabin of Peter the Great 1. Introduction In recent decades, there has been increasing interest in the House of Romanov. An almost total absence of information on the life and activities of the members of this dy- nasty during the Soviet period led to an explosion of interest in this theme after the col- lapse of the USSR. In the post-Soviet period, a stream of literature about the Romanov dynasty looded society, focusing on the architects of that time as creators of particular architectural monuments. As a result, during the translation of collective knowledge, information about the role of the monarchs in creating the architectural heritage of St. Petersburg is practically absent. The present article offers an unusual way of looking at St Petersburg. This is the irst in the series of articles entitled “Architectural Chronicle of St Petersburg”, devoted to deining the contribution each monarch made to the development of the city. The aspects relating to the formation of social memory in society and its implications for the future have been suficiently studied in the historical and philosophical sense, therefore, the author of the paper has considered any scientiic insights unnecessary. Of all the approaches scientists have taken in studying heritage, the author is closest to the informative approach proposed by Ya.K. Rebane and further developed by such scientists as V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sanctions Will Affect Russian Shipbuilding
    WESTERN SANCTIONS WILL AFFECT RUSSIAN SHIPBUILDING Western sanctions will not hamper construction of nuclear icebreakers, but can have negative consequences for other Russian civilian shipbuilding. Western sanctions could curb Russian Arctic oil Statoil, Rosneft delay Siberian drilling, while CEO Sechin added to international sanction list This week the U.S. and EU hardened its sanctions against Russia designed to punish its continuing backing of separatists in Eastern Ukraine. The sanctions include the EU banning any trade in arms and the US prohibiting transactions with Russia’s United Shipbuilding Corporation, which it classified as a defense company. According to the United Shipbuilding Corporation the sanctions will probably have no impact on state orders that already are under construction, but can seriously hamper future orders. The Baltic Shipyard outside St. Petersburg has orders to construct Russia’s three next, much-needed nuclear-powered icebreakers. The prototype was laid down in November 2013 and is planned to be ready for service in December 2017. The two next icebreakers should be ready for delivery in 2019 and 2020. “We don’t see any problems in the construction of the nuclear icebreakers, since no part of the equipment - down to the last bolt and screw – has anything to do with the U.S.” a spokesperson from United Shipbuilding Corporation says to Arctic Info. Others are not so optimistic about the future of civilian Russian shipbuilding after the last sanctions were imposed. Head of St. Petersburg’s Committee for Industrial Policy and Innovation Maksim Meyksin says to website Baltpp that the sanctions can have serious impacts on the large shipyards in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Naval Strategy in the Mediterranean
    Russia’s Naval Strategy in the Mediterranean By Dmitry Gorenburg Executive Summary • Over the last decade, Russia has expanded its military footprint in the Mediterranean. Since establishing its Mediterranean Squadron in 2013, it has largely maintained a permanent naval presence in the region, based primarily on ships from the Black Sea Fleet, with support from ships and submarines of the Northern and Baltic Fleets. • Russia’s strategy uses the Mediterranean’s geography to protect Russia’s southern flanks while seeking to challenge the naval supremacy of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the United States in the eastern Mediterranean. Russia depends on maintaining and gradually expanding its naval presence in the Mediterranean while also securing expanded access to ports and bases, with the possibility of eventually contesting NATO’s dominance in the central Mediterranean as well. • Although the Russian Navy’s missions in the Mediterranean are primarily related to coastal defense and protection of territorial waters, conventional deterrence has come to play an increasingly important role since the development of a ship-based cruise missile capability. The Russian Navy has sought to establish credible maritime conventional deterrence versus NATO through the combination of air defenses and cruise missile– equipped ships, which work together to signal that any use of NATO naval forces against Russian ships and facilities would be highly costly for the adversary. Russia’s Strategic Goals Russia’s strategy in the Mediterranean is focused on three key goals: taking advantage of the Mediterranean’s geographical position to improve Russia’s security, using Russia’s position in the Mediterranean to increase Russia’s status as an alternative world power to the United States, and providing support for the Syrian regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Use of CTOL Aircraft Carriers in the Soviet Union and Russian Federation, 1945-Present
    Beyond Submarines: Development and Use of CTOL Aircraft Carriers in the Soviet Union and Russian Federation, 1945-present THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sara Anne Garrett Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2011 Master's Examination Committee: John Francis Guilmartin, Advisor Peter Mansoor Copyright by Sara Anne Garrett 2011 Abstract Russian and Soviet thinking on the construction and use of aircraft carriers evolved from initial opposition to acceptance of the concept of aircraft-capable ships. However, the Russian Navy currently possesses only one CTOL-capable aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov. This thesis examines the influence of social, political, and economic factors on the Soviet and Russian approach to carrier-based aviation and then considers the Moskva, Kiev, and Kuznetsov classes of carriers. The technical and personnel issues affecting the Kuznetsov‟s operation in the post-Soviet period provide a framework for evaluating the future of proposed carrier programs for the Russian Navy. In light of Russian ambitions on the world stage, public statements by naval leadership, and a marked increase in Navy spending on new ships, a continuation of Russia‟s carrier ambitions seems likely. ii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my parents, for encouraging me to follow my interests and to stay the course. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the staff of the library at the Naval War College for permitting me to avail myself of their collection. This thesis would not exist without the War College‟s materials.
    [Show full text]
  • “Decided Preponderance at Sea”: Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thought Kevin Rowlands Royal Navy
    Naval War College Review Volume 65 Article 9 Number 4 Autumn 2012 “Decided Preponderance at Sea”: Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thought Kevin Rowlands Royal Navy Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Rowlands, Kevin (2012) "“Decided Preponderance at Sea”: Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thought," Naval War College Review: Vol. 65 : No. 4 , Article 9. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol65/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rowlands: “Decided Preponderance at Sea”: Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thou “DECIDED PREPONDERANCE AT SEA” Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thought Commander Kevin Rowlands, Royal Navy liver Cromwell famously declared that “a man-o’-war is the best ambas- O sador”; a twenty-first-century equivalent represents the U.S. Navy in posters and on T-shirts and sweatshirts as an aircraft carrier over the caption “90,000 tons of diplomacy.” Though the images may be different, the message is the same—yet “naval diplomacy” is not a readily understood term. From the coercion delivered by the gunboats of the Pax Britannica to the modern-day ex- ercise of soft power through hardware, interpretations of what constitutes naval diplomacy are wide-ranging. Strategists have undoubtedly long been aware of its existence, but over the centuries few have been moved to study or document it in any substantial way.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications. The other parts are: Part 1: Introduction Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five
    CIRCUMPOLAR MILITARY FACILITIES OF THE ARCTIC FIVE Ernie Regehr, O.C. Senior Fellow in Arctic Security and Defence The Simons Foundation and Michelle Jackett, M.A. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five – last updated: September 2017 Ernie Regehr, O.C., and Michelle Jackett, M.A. Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five Introduction This compilation of current military facilities in the circumpolar region1 continues to be offered as an aid to addressing a key question posed by the Canadian Senate more than five years ago: “Is the [Arctic] region again becoming militarized?”2 If anything, that question has become more interesting and relevant in the intervening years, with commentators divided on the meaning of the demonstrably accelerated military developments in the Arctic – some arguing that they are primarily a reflection of increasing military responsibilities in aiding civil authorities in surveillance and search and rescue, some noting that Russia’s increasing military presence is consistent with its need to respond to increased risks of things like illegal resource extraction, terrorism, and disasters along its frontier and the northern sea route, and others warning that the Arctic could indeed be headed once again for direct strategic confrontation.3 While a simple listing of military bases, facilities, and equipment, either
    [Show full text]