2017-2022 Proposed Highway Improvement Program

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2017-2022 PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Lake County, Illinois Executive Summary Proposed Highway Improvement Program of Lake County

2017 - 2022 prepared by endorsed by the Paula J. Trigg, P.E. Public Works and Transportation Committee Director of Transportation | County Engineer of the Lake County Board

Lake County Division of Transportation 600 W. Winchester Road Ann Maine, Chair Libertyville, Illinois 60048 Diane Hewitt, Vice-Chair Michael Danforth 847.377.7400 Bill Durkin www.lakecountyil.gov Sidney Mathias Linda Pedersen Our Mission Craig Taylor Our mission is to provide a safe, efficient and innovative Jeff Werfel transportation system to enhance mobility, economic development and quality of life in Lake County. Terry Wilke

June 7, 2017 Safety and the Division of Transportation Signs for Safety Making sure that Lake County roads, bridges and bike paths are safe for the traveling pub- The Lake County Division of Trans- lic is the top priority of the Lake County Division of Transportation (LCDOT). Every portation wants you to keep decision we make, and every improvement we bring to the transportation safety at the forefront system, is driven by our mission to enhance safety. Whether it’s keeping as you go about your daily activities. Our up on maintenance to preserve the current system, updating technology sign shop fabricates to modernize the system, or providing additional safety features dur- and installs signs on ing an expansion of the system, safety is always the most important Lake County road- consideration when it comes to selecting projects. ways to remind you to Think Safety! We are working with representatives from local governments and police departments on a multi-jurisdictional team to look at crash data to identify opportunities for safety improvements. The team consists of local officials, engineers, and law enforcement officials who look at high crash areas from different professional standpoints. Engineers look at the location and determine if there are signage, lighting, or other changes that can be implemented to make it safer, while police officers look at the same location and determine if there are traffic safety enforcement strategies that can be implemented to address the issue. Public educa- tion and outreach are other key factors in the effort to keep safety in the minds of all road users. Enhanced curve markings for better visibility But safety is not just about us…the final piece in the safety Railroad grade separation at Washington Street puzzle is YOU. As a road user, whether in a vehicle, on a bike, or walking or running along the sidewalk or bike path, the decisions you make and actions you take have an impact on the safety of everyone around you. Traffic crash data shows us that crashes are on the rise, at both local and national levels. But each of us has the power to reverse the trend and move that number in the opposite direction. So what can you do?

Pedestrians: • Walk on sidewalks where available • Obey all signs and signals • Eliminate distractions—put your phones away, remove headphones when crossing the street • Be visible to drivers by wearing bright or reflective clothing • Remember you are less visible at dusk and at night • Cross streets at crosswalks or intersections where possible Including pedestrian accommodations Bicyclists: • Always wear a helmet Drivers: • Follow the rules of the road, same as cars • Eliminate distractions—put your phones away! • Keep your eyes on the road, and expect the unexpected • Keep your eyes on the road, and expect the unexpected • Eliminate distractions—put your phones away, remove • Watch for motorcycles headphones • Slow down in construction zones and school zones • Be visible to drivers by wearing bright or reflective clothing • Obey the speed limit, and wear your seatbelt • Stop for pedestrians in cross walks No matter what you encounter on the roads, just remember— • Don’t drive impaired we are all in this together. We are not in competition with other • Drive nice—aggressive driving increases risk for error road users, we are neighbors. We all want to get home safely at the end of the day. Table of Contents County Highway and Bikeway maps insert front

Overview 1 Plan Requirements 1 Program Development 2 Interrelation with Budget Development 2 Guidance for the 5-Year Program 3 Transportation and Communication 4 Long Range Planning: The Planning Process 4 CMAP GO TO 2040 5 2040 Transportation Plan 6 Illinois Route 53/120 12 Program Priorities 13 Number of Projects by Category 14 2018-2022 Program Highlights 15 Preserving the System 16 Modernizing the System 18 Expanding the System 20 Funding and Revenue 22 Federal Funding 22 Fund Sources 2017-2022 | 2018 22 Joint Projects 23 Funds Distribution 2017-2022 | 2018 23 Project Phases 24 Project Listings 25 Reading the CPMS Printout 26 Summary TIP Project Listing 27

Note: This document includes Lake County’s complete 2017 - 2022 Proposed Highway Improvement Program in pdf format on CD (see inside back cover.) Additional copies of the program are available by contacting the Lake County Division of Transportation.

Overview

A safe and efficient transportation system contributes to quality of Lake County’s trans- life for the residents of Lake County. Lake County businesses also rely portation network is on this network to move goods and services through the county and made up of roads, bridges, to help people get to their jobs. Our transportation system is one of bike paths, and other com- the most visible and fundamental assets of the county. Maintaining ponents owned by: and improving the county’s highway system is essential for a strong local economy, a healthy environment, and for the efficient move- • State of Illinois ment of goods and people. • Lake County Plan Requirements • 52 municipalities The 5 Year Program is the scheduling component of the county’s • 15 township road Long Range Transportation Plan. The current Long Range Plan is the districts Year 2040 Lake County Transportation Priority Plan, endorsed in June • Illinois Tollway 2014. A highway project, particularly an add-lanes project, takes • Metra several years of study and engineering to properly address roadway design, drainage, environmental, municipal and public coordination • Pace issues. The implementation of the 5-Year Program is a continual process, like an assembly line. Many of the projects in this program are in varying stages of readiness carried over from previous programs. New projects need to “get on the assembly line”.

This plan fulfills a portion of Section 5-301, “County Long Range Plan,” of the Illinois Road and Bridge Laws, which requires the County MAIN STREET Engineer to annually update a 20-year Long Range Highway Trans-

Executive Summary • 1 portation Plan and a 5-year County Highway Improvement Program. Lake County ivision of Transportation Capital Programming The 5 year program covers the time period from December 1, 2017 to System Modernization Projects November 30, 2022, and is prepared 6 months in advance of the start (TCAS, Syncro) System Preservation of the county’s next fiscal year. Therefore, this program document also Projects (Argus) System Expansion Projects includes the approved budget for the current fiscal year of the county, (2040 Plan, Paratransit Plan) County Engineer fiscal year 2017 (12/1/2016 to 11/30/2017) as a sixth year (i.e. the annual program).

Public Works and IDOT Local Taxes Transportation Committee CMAP State Revenue Lake County Board Municipalities Townships Program Development Public Land Use Changes The county highway system is a 300-mile network of major collec- Annual tor arterial highways and more than 60 miles of bike facilities in Lake Program 5 Year Annual Program Projects Budget Already Under 20 Year County, operated by the Lake County Division of Transportation. These Construction Plan highways are marked by pentagonal blue and gold Lake County route markers and the bike paths by the route identification sign incorporat- ing the Lake County logo. The front of this section includes maps of the county highway system and bike facilities. Daily travel on the system is more than 3.4 million vehicle miles on 878 lane miles. This document also provides background on how projects are included in the highway improvement program.

Interrelation with Budget Development By law, prior to July 1 of each year the 5-Year Highway Improvement Program is prepared by the County Engineer. The annual program for the subsequent fiscal year of the county (e.g. starting 12/1/2016) is developed based upon an estimate from the county administrator’s office of the tax revenues to be allocated by the county board in the Many of the larger projects incorporate an extensive public involvement process

2 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program upcoming budgets. The program therefore serves as a document for The Lake County Strategic Plan goal regarding transportation is con- the submission of the requested budgets, for the next fiscal year, in the sidered directly in the development of portions of the 5-Year high- four highway capital funds supporting highway improvements: the way improvement program from year to year. The Strategic Plan and County Bridge Tax fund, the Matching Tax fund, the Motor Fuel Tax fund ongoing progress can be found on Lake County’s website at www. and the Transportation Sales Tax fund. lakecountyil.gov/StrategicPlan.

Guidance for the 5-Year Program The Lake County Division of Transportation is guided by the goals and strategies outlined in the Lake County Strategic Plan. As stated in the plan, Lake County government is committed to promoting and sustain- ing a safe, healthy, vibrant and environmentally responsible county, while maintaining its strong financial position. In partnership with citi- zens, communities and all levels of government, we pledge to deliver efficient and high quality public services consistent with the community’s values and priorities.

We envision Lake County as a leader in developing a thriving and robust local economy, healthy natural environment, safe and livable communities, healthy residents, and innovative public services that are responsive to the diverse needs of all residents. Goal: Improve Transportation

The Strategic Plan is broken down into five main goals, one of which is Strategic Statement: Promote development of state, county, and municipal transportation systems that “Improve Transportation”. The County Engineer serves as the chair of provide for efficient, flexible and uncongested the Transportation Goal Committee and the committee continues to movement through an integrated network of road, rail, make progress on the transportation actions identified in the plan and public transit, and non-motorized (bicycle, pedestrian) other key areas that will have long-lasting benefits to the community. modes of travel

Executive Summary • 3 Transportation and Communication Long Range Planning: GO TO 2040 and Lake County’s 2040 Transporta- tion Plan

The interaction between residents and local government has changed in the past few years—not only are residents’ expectations The Planning Process changing, but there are new communication channels where this The 2040 Transportation Plan followed a consensus-based approach interaction occurs. The public takes a much more active role in including stakeholder and multi-agency involvement. Key among seeking out information about road construction, project meetings these efforts was coordination with the Blue Ribbon Advisory Council and other county services by checking Lake County PASSAGE from which put forth its recommendation for Illinois Route 53/120 North their mobile devices, sending email, interacting with us on Facebook Extension. The Council’s recommendation is included, along with and even tweeting in requests for service. several other projects in the baseline improvements in the 2040 Plan.

Roadway network modeling was built off of CMAP’s regional transportation model with adjustments to local characteristics. Once the Lake County is committed to transparency and to being a part of county model was calibrated with existing known traffic conditions, the conversation. We utilize many of the communication channels baseline improvements were added to the network. The model in- available to us to connect motorists with the information they need cluded population and employment projections to the year 2040 and to navigate Lake County’s highway system all year long. Our website, the corresponding traffic impacts to the roadway system. Deficiency www.lakecountyil.gov/transportation was recently redesigned Analysis was based on three measures of performance: Level of with the user in mind, streamlining information so residents can find Service (LOS), Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C), and Travel Desire Ratio what they are need easily, and the site is now responsive to adapt to (TDR). The results of these measures were combined into a Deficien- any device making it even more accessible. cy Index that identified roadways to be considered for improvement. Improvements were then prioritized based on the Deficiency Index, previous studies, cost, and potential to link people to jobs.

4 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Transit and non-motorized recommendations were based on the as- experts, and a shorter plan that is for a broader audience. Both ver- sessed needs of users throughout the County. Previous plans such as sions call on local officials, businesses, and other stakeholder groups the County’s 2020 Transportation Plan and CMAP’s GoTo2040 were to implement recommendations that—while very specific—have evaluated as well. Planned transit and non-motorized projects con- broad implications for residents’ daily lives. sidered connectivity, existing facilities and services, and jurisdictional issues. The plan recommends action in four themes: Livable Communities, Regional Mobility, Human Capital, and Efficient Governance. The Re- gional Mobility theme addresses the vitality of the Chicago region’s CMAP GO TO 2040 Comprehen- transportation system, which is crucial for economic prosperity and sive Regional Plan overall quality of life, and includes recommendations such as: Based on nearly three years of research, • Invest Strategically in Transportation deliberation, and public input, the • Increase Commitment to Public Transit Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Plan- • Create a More Efficient Freight Network ning’s (CMAP) first truly comprehensive The GO TO 2040 Plan affects transportation decisions in Lake County regional plan, GO TO 2040, was adopted because of the need to expend federal transportation dollars in October 13, 2010. conformance with the GO TO 2040 Plan. In addition, of all the capital projects considered in the GO TO 2040 Plan, the IL 53/120 (Central Building Sustainable Prosperity Lake) Tollway will have the highest congestion reduction benefit and CMAP envisions that implementing the GO TO 2040 comprehensive the largest economic impact of any project. regional plan is metropolitan Chicago’s best chance to set the stage for economic growth in decades to come. The plan defines carefully coor- dinated policies to address the fundamental challenges that shape our daily lives. GO TO 2040 reflects the collective will of our region’s leaders and residents.

GO TO 2040 exists as two documents: a full-length plan aimed at policy

Executive Summary • 5 6 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Lake County’s 2040 Transportation Plan Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) or the Illinois Department of Trans- portation (IDOT) - and extend entirely through the county (for (The following text and maps are as published in Lake County’s 2040 Plan, June 2014) example, I-94). Primary arterial highways, which carry regional traffic, crisscross the county and generally extend beyond county borders. The Roadway Network Explained These highways are under the jurisdiction of IDOT (examples are US Between 2010 and 2040, the estimated number of peak period trips Route 45, IL Route 22). County highways, which are the responsibility generated in Lake County is expected to increase by 36%. In order of Lake County, go through municipalities and function as a second- to address the deficiencies in the roadway network and meet the ary arterial highway system - collecting traffic and distributing it to increased capacity demand, a number of baseline improvements the primary arterial highway system, i.e. state roads. Township routes were previously planned and are set for construction in the near- are local roads in unincorporated areas providing direct access to term. In addition to these improvements, the 2040 Plan recommends individual properties; they are usually short in length. Streets on the a variety of roadway improvements including roadway widening, municipal system are the local streets within municipal boundaries; route extensions, and intersection/interchange projects. The majority however, in some parts of the county, municipalities do have jurisdic- of projects add additional capacity to existing roads. With baseline tion of some secondary arterial highways. Municipal routes do not projects included, there are approximately 210 miles of roadway extend beyond the limits of the municipality; they also tend to be improvements included in the 2040 Plan. short in length.

The Lake County roadway network ranges between local roads, Access Permits & Plat Approval – Driveway and public road ac- township roads, county highways, state highways, federal highways, cess onto county highways requires an access permit issued by the and interstates. Several government agencies construct, maintain, County Engineer. Subdivision plat approval regarding roadway and operate roads in Lake County. By Illinois state law, these routes access is also required. The location of earthern berms and/or deten- are the responsibility of one of five entities: the State of Illinois, the tion facilities adjacent to county highway rights-of-way may also Illinois Tollway, Lake County, a township, or a municipality. Each of require a permit. Contact the permit office at: Lake County Division these entities generally has responsibility for a particular functional of Transportation, 600 West Winchester Road, Libertyville, Illinois class of road. For example, highways that primarily carry interstate 60048, phone ( 847) 377-7400. traffic are operated by state levels of government -the Illinois State

Executive Summary • 7 The Non-Motorized Network Explained bus to commuter rail can best address the different characteristics of Approximately 300 miles of additional non-motorized facilities are the County. Improved transit in the County would provide important recommended as part of the Lake County 2040 Transportation Plan. alternative transportation that improves the quality of life and the These are planned to primarily be off-street multi-use paths for use economic potential for Lake County residents.Lake County is cur- by cyclists, pedestrians, and other non-motorized users. Many proj- rently served by four Metra rail lines and thirty two Pace bus routes. ects connect to Metra stations and bus routes in order to improve Enhancements to existing services are recommended in the 2040 the viability of travel without the need for an automobile. These Transportation Plan. Some projects, such as a new demand response recommendations also provide essential non-motorized connections service can be implemented in a shorter time frame, while other proj- to communities, jobs, parks, schools, forest preserves, and other des- ects, such as a Metra commuter rail extension to Wadsworth, require tinations throughout Lake County.There are currently over 500 miles significant capital investment. of public bicycle facilities throughout the County. These include off- street paths and on-street lanes. Off-street bike paths include paved Metra Commuter Rail Ridership —Approximately 13,500 people ride asphalt and unpaved, crushed gravel surfaces. Metra in Lake County on an average weekday – an annual weekday Metra ridership of approximately 3.4 million. Non-Motorized Facilities Jurisdiction —Lake County Division of Pace Suburban Bus Ridership —Approximately 12,500 trips are taken Transportation (LCDOT) has jurisdiction over approximately 48 miles on Lake County bus routes on an average weekday, which is equal to of bicycle facilities. Lake County Forest Preserve District (LCFPD) has annual weekday bus ridership of over 3 million. jurisdiction over approximately 140 miles of multiuse trails that can be used by cyclists. Other non-motorized facilities throughout the County are under a variety of jurisdictions including municipalities, townships, and institutions.

The Transit Network Explained Due to the diversity of land uses, population and employment densi- ties throughout Lake County, there is no single transit solution. A pal- ette of transit services, ranging from demand response to fixed route

8 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Executive Summary • 9 10 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program hns Ave

Sheridan Rd Saint Jo N

County Line RdLine County

tS kaO tS Central

HIGHLAND PARK HIGHLAND Skokie Hwy

HIGHWOOD HIGHWOOD

Sheridan Rd Sheridan

dR nadirehS dR Sheridan Rd Scale in MILES Scalein Genesee St Genesee 21st St

Deerﬁeld Rd ZION ZION WINTHROP HARBOR WINTHROP WINTHROP HARBOR WINTHROP Golf Rd

iehS h dire a n R d Skokie Valley Rd

WAUKEGAN S WAUKEGAN

Bethlehem Ave St 14 th

I evA siweL evA Y Ave is Lew N evA siweL evA T

ok Rd Co ok N alf DayRd O 0 1 2 3 LAKE BLUFF

LAKE BLUFF U

Green Bay Rd H

ywH eikokS ywH O

DEERFIELD DEERFIELD

e N

d Lake

dR ahsoneK dR R C

LAKE FOREST LAKE FOREST I N

21st St

33rdSt S Waukegan E L

NORTH CHICAGO NORTH K NORTH CHICAGO NORTH Russell Rd

Belvidere Rd Belvidere A L Grand Ave Grand W a eku ag n R d BEACH PARK BEACH BEACH PARK BEACH L Martin Luther King Jr Dr

Yorkhous I 9th St9th N S k o eik H w y

IL Route173 0 Sunset Ave BANNOCKBURN

dR yaB neerG BANNOCKBURN

Y US Highway 41 Saunders Rd Saunders 4 2

Washington StWashington

W Kennedy WRd Kennedy

94 dR nagekuaW dR L E A

Wadsworth Wadsworth Rd K PARK CIT PARK CITY

Duy Ln 4+ Lanes 3 Lanes 2 Lanes 1 Lane

aeneerG r e e eln fa S t Rockland Rd

dR ynaleD N ynaleD dR dR sdoowreviR dR Bradley Rd Bradley RIVERWOODS RIVERWOODS GURNEE GURNEE

Scale in MI LES

dR enruobliK N enruobliK dR ine Rd ine la O’P N N RdDeerﬁeld 94 WADSWORTH WADSWORTH

W EverettW Rd

W ILW Route 60

Exi s t ingDir Roadways ect ion One LanesIn dR syraM tniaS N tniaS syraM dR LINCOLNSHIRE LINCOLNSHIRE Milwaukee Ave GREEN OAKS GREEN GREEN OAKS GREEN

Skokie Hwy METTAWA METTAWA

Guerin Guerin Rd

Buckley Rd

14 yawhgiH SU Oak Spring Rd

Milwaukee Ave 0 1 2 3

Rockland Rd

dR keerC lliM keerC dR Weiland Rd Weiland N IL Route 21 Route IL N 4+ Lanes 3 Lanes 2 Lanes 1 Lane WHEELING WHEELING

94 dR bulC tnuH bulC dR

VERNON HILLS VERNON

VERNON HILLS VERNON Deerﬁeld PkwyDeerﬁeld

Townline Townline Rd US Highway 45

E xi sting Roadways Lanes In One Direction

LIBERTYVILLELIBERTYVILLE

dR dnomlA N dnomlA dR

S Butterﬁeld Rd Butterﬁeld S GROVE BUFFALO BUFFALO GROVE BUFFALO

W IL Route 120 IL Route W

Park Ave Park

Grand Ave Grand N notgnilrA sthgieH dR

W AptakisicW Rd ey Rd

Edwards Rd

Washington St Washington

W Millburn Rd

Cas dR drofwarC dR 3 8 etu o R LI R o etu 8 3

OLD MILL CREEK OLD OLD MILL CREEK OLD

tS ekaL tS GROVE LONG LONG GROVE LONG i U S giH h w a y 4 5 IL Route 22

INDIAN CREEK INDIAN INDIAN CREEK INDIAN

IL Route 53 Route IL

Harris Rd Harris MUNDELEIN MUNDELEIN

Center St Center i od M toldi aih n R d

Winchester Rd dR kceB dR 3 Ext THIRD LAKE THIRD THIRD LAKE THIRD 5 ension

IL Route Sand Sand Lake Rd

Miller Rd IL Route 137 3 8 e t u o R LI N LI R o u t e 8 3

Maple Ave IL Route 83 LINDENHURST LINDENHURST

dR egavaS dR Rollins Rd Rollins Rd Chase Chevy

ute 173 Ro ute Peterson Rd W ILW

Old McHenry Rd IL Route 83 KILDEERKILDEER d Ave ran d d R y n a h g ellA N ellA g h a n y R d

G GRAYSLAKE nitneuQ dR GRAYSLAKE W Gelden Rd Gelden W

Engle Dr Engle

N Gilmer Rd Lake Cook Rd dR ekaL peeD N peeD ekaL dR Rand Rd 2040 ROADWAY PLAN HAINESVILLE HAINESVILLE

W Hawley W St

d R retn e C tn o m erF N erF m o tn C e retn R d s a

LCDOT - Interchange/Intersection Improvement - Interchange/Intersection LCDOT Improvement - Interchange/Intersection Other Jurisdiction Improvement - Interchange/Intersection Jurisdiction Shared P

highlighted in green are planned and considered as baseline improvements in the 2040 Transportation Plan in the 2040 Transportation baseline improvements considered as and planned are highlighted in green

DEER PARK DEER DEER PARK

LCDOT Widening Route Widening Jurisdiction Other LCDOT Extension Route Route Extension Jurisdiction Other LCDOT Improvement - Interchange/Intersection Improvement - Interchange/Intersection Jurisdiction Other Improvement - Interchange/Intersection Shared Jurisdiction Midlothian Rd Midlothian

N Owens Rd Owens N 2

n StE Mai n

1 E Main St

W Grass Lake Rd

e t

LAKE VILLA LAKE VILLA

IL Route 83 o

AKE

rth Ave No rth C e d ra L a k e R d

Long Grove Rd Long Grove

W Belvidere Rd Belvidere W L

LAKELAKE ZURICH ZURICH I

ROUND LAKE PARK ROUND ROUND LAKE PARK ROUND

W Cuba RdW Cuba

HAWTHORN WOODS HAWTHORN WOODS HAWTHORN LEGEND Im provements* Proposed Roadway

*Improvements ANTIOCH N alE dR ANTIOCH ROUND LAKE BEACH ROUND

ROUND LAKE BEACH ROUND Old Rand Rd

ROUND L ROUND Rd Milton W ROUND LAKE ROUND

Fairﬁeld Rd Fairﬁeld

2 1 y a w h giH S U N U S giH h w a y 1 2

Beach Grove Rd BeachGrove W PetiteW Lake Rd Ivanhoe Rd Ivanhoe

IL Route 59 Route IL Grand Ave Grand

IL Route 176 ROUND LAKE HEIGHTS ROUND ROUND LAKE HEIGHTS ROUND Gossell Rd

IL Route 22

MillerRd

W Monaville RdW Monaville

Bonner Rd

dR dnalraG dR 95 etuoR LI etuoR 95

W IL Route 60

N Wilson Rd Wilson N BARRINGTON BARRINGTON

NORTH BARRINGTON NORTH NORTH BARRINGTON NORTH

W IL Route 120 Route IL W

dR ekaL hsiF N hsiF ekaL dR dR nahallaC nahallaC dR

WAUCONDA WAUCONDA Grand Ave Grand

evA ekaL N ekaL evA UNINCORPORATED Nippersink Rd N dnaR dR

VOLO Molidor Rd Molidor

N Kelsey Rd Kelsey N roadwayPLAN 2040

W Wilmot Rd

12 ay Highw US

Rollins Rd Case Rd W IL Route176 TOWER LAKES TOWER TOWER LAKES TOWER Line Rdnty

US Highway 12

Fisher Rd Fisher W Northwest Hwy

W C ou FOX LAKELAKE FOX FOX Kelsey Rd Kelsey

LCDOT Route Widening Widening Other Jurisdiction LCDOT Route Extension Extension Route Other Jurisdiction burg Rd burg

Big RdHollow

NevilleRd BARRINGTON HILLS BARRINGTON

Darrell Rd HILLS BARRINGTON Main St Branden

LAKE BARRINGTON LAKEMOOR LAKE BARRINGTON LAKEMOOR d R kra P et at S N S at et P kra R d PORT BARRINGTON PORT PORT BARRINGTON PORT ISLAND LAKE ISLAND ISLAND LAKE ISLAND FOX RIVERFOX GROVE FOX RIVERFOX GROVE LEGEND Impro v ements Pr opos ed Roadway

Executive Summary • 11 Illinois Route 53/120

Much progress continues to be made to advance the IL Route 53/120 project. In May 2017, the Illinois Tollway Board approved the consult- ing engineering contract for a two-tier Environment Impact State- ment (EIS) that will evaluate the IL Route 53/120 project in extensive detail, analyze alternatives and the potential environmental impacts. An EIS will include a robust public input component.

Over the last several years, the Tollway, Lake County and local stake- holders participated in a feasibility study to evaluate environmental impacts, land use planning, and financing. The result of that effort was a Blue Ribbon Advisory Council (BRAC) plan that recommended an innovative parkway with specific design and performance standards that reduce congestion, preserve the environment, and Population projections call for Lake County to grow by 30% over the enhance connectivity. The plan integrates land use, transportation, next 25 years. Using these projections, LCDOT initiated additional economic development, and open space, and leaders recommended analysis into its 2040 Transportation Plan evaluating the impact various finance options to help pay for the road. without IL Route 53. This study showed that significant investments would need to be made to our existing transportation system— The IL Route 53/120 project will provide much needed relief to Lake including widening existing roads through residential areas, and County’s significant traffic congestion. The time saved is estimated at building new bypasses. These alternatives would be more costly and an hour a day (roundtrip/per vehicle). A preliminary study also found would occur without the environmental standards called for in the the total economic impact resulting from road construction and consensus plan. commercial/residential development is between $17 and $19 billion. And, the study showed the project would add 25,000 to 30,000 full- time jobs to our economy.

12 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Program Priorities program. They are meant to give an early indication of some future Lake County’s transportation program is a balance of Preserva- project priorities and costs. The program is fiscally constrained by tion, Modernization and Expansion. the revenue expected to be available and thus sets out a proposed spending plan for the next five years. Implementation of the recom- Some projects are designed to address traffic flow problems associat- mended spending plan is the prerogative of the county board as it ed with peak travel times (about 20% of the daily traffic), while others sets yearly tax levies, budgets and individually appropriates monies provide benefits to all daily highway users. Maps of proposed future toward phases of projects. highway projects, including those projects which are already under construction and for which funds will be paid out during Priorities for Funding Consideration the current fiscal year are provided in this document, as well as a summary listing of Keep county highway pavements, bridges, System Preservation bikeways and signals and related items in all projects. 1 Projects good condition. This 5 Year Program does not indicate the priority of any individual project; priorities Reduce delays and increase safety by are developed during the yearly county System Modernization accommodating short-term traffic growth Projects and the needs of non-motorists. budget cycle and design process. Under 2 the Illinois Highway Code, the county board must individually appropriate monies for each phase of a project from the three Provide highway capacity to meet long-term System Expansion traffic growth needs and provide for economic traditional highway capital funds. LCDOT 3 Projects development. follows this same process for the Transpor- tation Sales Tax fund. Monies earmarked as post-2022 are not part of the 5-year portion of the program, but are a part of the 20-year

Executive Summary • 13 Project Types

A variety of project types are proposed to meet the priorities listed in the program: Number of Projects by Category 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program

Category

Worktype PMEBDT 3R 6 Bikepath 6 Bonds 4 5 Bridges 6 1 Culverts 19 Drainage 13 Engineering Support 7 10 7 Enhancements 4 8 Guardrail 6 Intersection 33 4 Maintenance 56 Other 1 Paratransit 8 Patch 9 Patrol 1 19 Plan 14 1 Railroad 1 1 Reconstruction 5 1 Resurface 53 Road Districts 6 Roadway 6 8 16 Signals 3 38 Totals 218 120 38 0 4 5

category key P = Preservation B = Bond Issuance M = Modernization D = Debt Service E = Expansion T = Fund Transfer

14 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program 2018-2022 Program Highlights PRESERVATION

PRESERVATION MODERNIZATION EXPANSION

21st St: e of Delany Rd [culvert] 14th St: IL131 to Jackson St Aptakisic Rd: IL83 to Buffalo Grove Rd Center St: Avon-Fremont ditch [re-line culvert] Bike Paths: Wayfinding signage Buffalo Grove Rd: IL22 to Deerfield Pkwy Darrell Rd [culvert] Butterfield Rd: Allanson Rd to IL137 Deerfield Rd: Saunders to w of IL21 Deep Lake Rd: Grass Lake Rd to IL132 Cedar Lake Rd: IL120 to Nippersink Rd Lake Cook Rd: Raupp Blvd to Hastings Ln Everett Rd: St Mary’s Rd to E of I-94 bridge Darrell Rd at Case & Fisher Rd Quentin Rd: White Pine to S of IL22 Fairfield Rd [culvert] Ela Rd at Long Grove Rd Gages Lake Rd [culvert] Fairfield Rd at Metra/IL134 Grass Lake Rd: State Park Rd to Drexel Blvd Fairfield Rd at Monaville Rd Hutchins Rd at Mill Creek [culvert] Fremont Center Rd: IL60 to Peterson Rd Kenosha Rd [culvert] Gilmer Rd: at Midlothian Rd Midlothian Rd [culvert] Hart Rd at US14 & Union Pacific RR Millburn Rd [bridge deck profiling] Hunt Club Rd at IL132 | Washington St St Mary’s Rd: IL176 | IL60 | Everett Rd IL120: Knight Av to IL131 State Park Rd: Main St to US12 IL59 at Grand Av Stearns School Rd: at I-94 bridge Kenosha Rd at IL131 Wadsworth Rd: IL131 to Sheridan Rd PASSAGE signal interconnects York House Rd: e of Lewis [drainage] Miller Rd at US12 and more than 52 miles of resurfacing North Ave: Deep Lake Rd to US45 Old McHenry Rd | US12 | IL22 Skokie Valley Bike Trail: Lake Cook to Dempster Stearns School Rd: at US41 Wadsworth Rd: Dilley’s | Kilbourne | Lewis Winchester Rd: at IL83

Executive Summary • 15 Preserving the System Properly managed maintenance These projects keep highway pavements, bridges, bike paths and strategies preserve our other assets in a good condition. Preservation projects are normally current transportation system given first priority. Many of these projects are developed from and help assure that our roads, bridges and bike paths road inventories and inspections. Others are derived using Argus, a are safe for the traveling public. computer-based pavement management program which analyzes Keeping roads in good condition pavement testing results and generates a set of recommended proj- is our first priority when putting together this plan. There are several ways ects for the next five years, given budget availability. we can enhance safety through preservation Lake County has made a significant investment in its pavements. The projects. For example, during a resurfacing estimated cost to build the existing county roadway network today project, we extend the exceeds $2.1 billion. Preservation projects help to protect this invest- pavement on each side to accommodate bike- ment, and provide smooth pavements and bridges to highway users. friendly shoulders where we have the room to do Keeping Track: Pavement Facts so. This gives both cyclists and motorists a little extra room to share the road. During a resurfacing we also consider various design elements to bring the road up to standard, such as re- lanelane milesmiles 878878 grading ditches for optimum drainage, to prevent flooding and standing water. We also invest in signage and road striping, and centerlinecenterline milesmiles 298298 continue to try innovative new techniques milesmiles ofof pavedpaved shouldershoulder 168 such as retroreflective 168 materials and recessed milesmiles ofof bikebike facilitiesfacilities pavement markings to 6363 enhance visibility for road users, especially averageaverage ageage ofof roadwayroadway 4848 at night. averageaverage ageage ofof surfacesurface 1212 16 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Preservation Projects: 2017 - 2022

Russell Rd.

North Av S92 Lake Lake Ave.

Deep Lake Rd. S5 S4 S68 S66

S65 Lewis Ave. VS173 21st St. 3 . S83 Hunt Club Rd. S d V R 27 a S h s o ss Lake Rd. n Gra 49 e S K S50 72 S VS137 33rd St. . Rd S41 Kilbourne Rd. Petite Lake Wadsworth Rd. 105 /41 S S51 S77 76 98 26 S S S Delany Rd. York House Rd. Dilley's Rd. Dilley's 116 115 33 Sand Lake Rd. S S S S47 S79 Engle Dr. /12 60 S S100 S99 Sunset Ave. 37 VS132 S S19 30 VS131 91 ollins Rd. S 90 S89 R S S . d R

e 57 l

l Lewis Ave. i S v s Hollow Rd. e

ig in B 134 34 a VSS H Cedar Lake Rd. S107 S108 Washington St. S40 Gages Lake Rd. 53 S54 S VS120 21 Center St. S6 O'Plaine Rd. 70 . S S

d ´ Wilson Rd. R McGaw Rd.

d l Pu 71 e S i laski Dr.

f 14th St. r

i 2

a S F

Cedar Lake Rd.

Lewis Ave. asey Rd. Alleghany Alleghany Rd. C þ Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. ¨§94 VS83 S59 V VS60 VS137 U Programmed /45 Peterson Rd. 24 S Winchester Rd.

. Preliminary d

R U

VS21 's

22 r S a

. 176 t 43 VS S S 39 . S 74 d

S R S43 d V 11 l

10 e

S i

S f

23 r

S e Hawley St. t

u S42 B Miles S97 /41 . /12 d n R hia lot R id obert M 17 S60 s Rd S V . O 46 ld S M 96 c S H en . r d y R R

r d.

e v i 32 R G S ilm e r Diamond Lake Rd. Rd. Miller Rd. S82

64 Riverwoods Rd.

S VS22 Quentin Quentin Rd. VS22 Duffy Ln. S81 Prairie Rd. Aptakisic Rd. S7 Cub a Rd.

S53 . V d /14 R Deerfield Rd.

13 d 28 S n S a l 73 i Long Grove Rd. S S9 e 55 W S Ela Rd. S12 S94 Lake-Cook Rd. utored y ProectsiveearPlanMapsPMEPreservationx.mxd y utored

ate Executive Summary • 17 Modernizing the System Modernization projects enhance Most modernization projects are developed based on traffic engi- safety by using technology to make our roads neering analysis. Modernization projects reduce delays and increase smarter. Investment in our safety by more efficiently operating the highway system and by Intelligent Transportation accommodating short-term traffic growth. For example, adding a left System, Lake County PASSAGE, helps keep cars moving more turn lane on the main highway will eliminate the back-up of traffic efficiently. For example, each year behind a stopped vehicle waiting to turn left onto a side street, and we conduct Signal Coordination and Timing Studies to make sure cars get more adding a traffic signal allows side street traffic to safely enter the green lights through a corridor. With less starting and stopping, higher-traffic highway. there are fewer opportunities for conflict. Improving safety at intersections is also an important priority under the modernization category. This can be done by improving lighting, add- Since 2008, traffic crash reports have been received from IDOT. IDOT ing turn lanes, and in some cases changing from a traditional has an electronic crash report system with the police agencies and intersection to a roundabout! the county has installed compatible software to access the IDOT elec- Roundabouts tronic data. It is still necessary for LCDOT to obtain the actual crash provide safer and reports themselves for more complete analysis. more efficient traffic flow than standard intersec- Projects which accommodate non-motorized travel are also included tions in many loca- in the modernization category, as is the county’s implementation tions. Navigating a roundabout is easy of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements through Lake – and since traffic County PASSAGE. Countywide coordination of paratransit service is moves in only one direction, crashes also in the Modernization category. are less severe and traffic flows smoothly. Projects to improve bike paths and close Modernization projects are normally given second priority. sidewalk gaps also fall in this category, helping to further accommodate pedestrian travel.

18 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Modernization Projects: 2017 - 2022

S80 Russell Rd. e. 93

North Av S Lake Lake Ave.

9th St.

d R

a h s o n e

Deep Lake Rd. 21st St. K VS173 VS83

Kilbourne Rd.

52 Lewis Ave. S 67 Grass LakeRd S . VS137 33rd St. Gelden Rd. d. e R Petite Lak S103 S104 Wadsworth Rd. S106 Millburn Rd.

/41

State Park Rd. Dilley's Rd. Dilley's . York House Rd. d lv B Sand Lake Rd.

G H

36 Delany Rd. u S Monaville Engle Dr. t R

d. c h

Hunt Club Rd. i /12 n Stearns Sch 63 s ool Rd. 101 Sunset Ave. S R S S132 d V . 58 VS131 llins Rd. S Ro

. d R

e l

l Lewis Ave. i v s Hollow Rd. e

ig VS134 in B

H S35 Cedar Lake Rd. S59

Washington St.

. d R Gages Lake Rd d .

112 Greenleaf St. m 120 61 S l VS S Center St. A S86 . 18 d ´ S Wilson Rd. R McGaw Rd.

d .

l P

d u

i l

R aski Dr. f r

i e 1

a S F a

e 45 C asey Rd. S Alleghany Rd. C Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. 111 VS83 VS137 S O'Plaine Rd. VS59 S60 Programmed G V / U /45 ilm S62 e Peterson Rd. r R 25 d. þ S VS21 ¨§94 S38 S114 113 Preliminary S Winchester Rd. U

. Midlothian Rd.

n 176 e VS

t 16

n S

Bonner Rd. o VS43

m re . F

d Hawley St.

l l

e Miles

r a

St. Mary's Rd.

B ut

t /41 e r /12 f i e l Rd

Rob . erts VS60 Rd. S84 S44

v e d. Everett Rd. r R

R y e OldM G d ls c ilm . e He e K nry r Diamond Lake Rd. R Rd. Miller Rd. S78 d.

Riverwoods Rd.

s 22 l 85 VS

e Quentin Quentin Rd. S K VS22 Duffy Ln.

Prairie Rd.

Ela Rd. Aptakisic Rd. 83 C S ub a Rd.

/14 B Deerfield Pkwy.

S53 u V .

f d Deerfield Rd. .

R d

o R d

s 56 G n a r S r l e Long Grove Rd. v i 31 d R S n

d We u a

Arlington Hts. Rd. . Lake-Cook Rd. S S95 utored y ProectsiveearPlanMapsPMEModernizationx.mxd y utored

ate Executive Summary • 19 Expanding the System Often our largest

and most complex State, Tollway, County, Township and Municipal roadways all combine projects, expansion projects are meant to add capacity to to make up the roadway travel network in Lake County. The capac- our transportation system. ity improvements needed to accommodate the growth in traffic in Projects that add lanes and widen roads are done to re- Lake County have not kept pace for many years resulting in a large lieve congestion. When looking backlog of congested roadways. Lake County recognizes the need to at traffic crash data, many rear- invest in projects that will add capacity to the road network and re- end collisions can be attributed to heavy congestion, making safety an important consideration duce travel delays. Highway investment also has a substantial impact when studying any potential improvement projects in the on the local economy—creating good paying jobs and providing for expansion category. the efficient movement of goods and people--making an area attrac- Another strategy for relieving congestion is a grade separation tive to desirable economic development. System Expansion projects project. LCDOT recently completed an intersection improve- are normally given third priority. ment and grade separation project at Rollins Road and IL Route 83 which provided The majority of the projects in the System Preservation and Modern- tremen- ization categories of the program are improvements that are neces- dous congestion sary to maintain and operate the existing county highway system. relief in Starting in 2008, the addition of the ¼% Sales Tax for Transportation central Lake County. allowed the county to greatly increase its allocation to the Expansion Addition- category and to use bond financing for larger capacity improve- ally, the ments. Lake County continues with this FY2017-2022 Highway project to widen and Improvement Program to aggressively program projects that will add reconstruct future capacity and improve travel conditions on the county highway Washington Street from Haryan Way to Lake Street will soon system. be complete. Washington Street has been lowered and a new railroad bridge was constructed over Washington Street elimi- nating an at-grade crossing.

20 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Expansion Projects: 2017 - 2022

North Ave. Russell Rd. Lake Lake Ave.

9th St.

21st St. S173 .

Deep Lake Rd. V d VS83 R a h s o n

Lewis Ave. e K

Grass LakeRd . VS137 33rd St. . Gelden Rd. d Kilbourne Rd. e R Petite Lak S102 Wadsworth Rd. Millburn Rd. S75 /41

Delany Rd.

State Park Rd. Dilley's Rd. Dilley's . York House Rd. d lv B Sand Lake Rd.

G H St u earn Monaville R Engle Dr. t s d c Sc . h hoo

i l R

/12 n d.

s Sunset Ave.

R S132 d V . VS131 . Rollins Rd

. d R

e l

l Lewis Ave. i v s Hollow Rd. e

ig in B 134 a Washington St. VS H

Cedar Lake Rd.

Hunt Club Rd.

. d R Gages Lake Rd d .

20 n

S o

Greenleaf St.

m 120 l VS O'Plaine Rd. Center St. A

d ´ Wilson Rd. R McGaw Rd.

d l Pu

i laski Dr.

f 14th St.

a F

Cedar Lake Rd.

S59 Lewis Ave. V Alleghany Rd. Casey Rd. þ Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. ¨§94 VS83

G VS60 VS137 Programmed ilm U er R Peterson Rd. D d a . r re ll Winchester Rd. R

. . Preliminary

R U

r S21

e V

n VS176

e Bonner Rd. r S43

F V Hawley St.

. d Miles R

el i f r

St. Mary's Rd. e t t

u B /41 . /12 d R an thi dlo Rob Mi erts VS60 Rd.

v e d. Everett Rd. r R

R y e OldM G d ls c ilm /45 . e He e K nry r R Diamond Lake Rd. . Rd d. Miller Rd. d .

n e

. u

d 14 Q R S

Riverwoods Rd.

ey s VS22

el K 15 VS22 SS87 Duffy Ln.

88 118 Aptak S S8 S isic Rd. C 110 uba S Rd. VS53 /14 S29 Long Grove Rd. S109

Arlington Hts. Rd.

Ela Rd. S69 Lake-Cook Rd. utored y ProectsiveearPlanMapsPMEExpansionx.mxd y utored

ate Executive Summary • 21 Funding and Revenue

The program is fiscally constrained by revenue expected to be available Fund Sources for the 5 Year Highway Improvement Program

Bonds Carryforward and thus sets out a proposed spending plan for the next five years. $9,169,900 Federal/ICC 1% $103,949,800 Other Funds Interest Earnings Current Tax Sources 18% Municipal State Township Other Developer Lake County has access to five local funds dedicated to or available for $29,616,300 CCIP highway purposes: 5% • County Highway Tax Sales Tax Matching Tax $286,273,975 $56,929,018 • County Bridge Tax (counties under 1 million population) 48% 10% • Matching Tax (counties under 1 million population) Motor Fuel Tax • Motor Fuel Tax $75,025,286 13% • ¼% Sales Tax for Transportation County Bridge Tax $28,256,629

The County Highway Tax fund is primarily used for the operation of the 5% 2017-2022 Program Total: $592 million Source: 2017-2022 Highway Improvement Program, CPMS v.5a Division of Transportation (e.g. labor costs for snow plowing), while the other four funds are primarily used for funding maintenance and construction projects on the county highway system and, if desired, the Fund Sources: 2018 Program Year state highway system, with some minor exceptions. All expenditures in Other Funds Interest Earnings Other Matching Tax Municipal $3,648,100 the construction funds (County Bridge Tax, Match Tax, Motor Fuel Tax $8,302,541 State Township 4% Developer and Transportation Sales Tax), whether for engineering (preliminary, 9% CCIP Motor Fuel Tax design, construction), right-of-way acquisition, or actual construc- $9,931,658 11% tion are included. The planned $100 million bond issuance in 2011, as Federal/ICC County Bridge Tax $33,199,800 $3,930,964 contained in the Plan for Using the New Collar County Transportation 35% 4% Empowerment Funds, has been restructured into three issuances, for a Sales Tax total of approximately $81 million. $34,511,385 37% Federal Funding 2018 Program Total: $94 million Lake County is very aggressive in pursuing federal sources of transpor- Source: 2017-2022 Highway Improvement Program, CPMS v.5a

22 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program tation funds. Federal transportation fund sources are formula program funds that flow through and are administered by IDOT. Some of the Funds Distribution | 2017-2022 by program category federal transportation funds that flow through IDOT then flow through the Chicago region’s federally-required metropolitan planning organi- zation (MPO), which operates in concert with the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). Lake County is a member of the Policy Committee. Some of these federal funds at MPO discretion then flow to the CMAP regional council of mayors, of which the Lake County CMAP Council of Mayors is one of eleven. LCDOT is a member of the Lake County CMAP Council of Mayors and provides the staffing for it, utiliz- 25% 28% 40% 7% Preservation Modernization Expansion Debt Service ing federal pass thru funding.

Source Inormation Service PS va Joint Projects Whenever possible, joint projects are undertaken in cooperation with other agencies, and are very common with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). All federal funds are administered by IDOT. Funds Distribution | 2018 Other county projects involve municipalities; for example, costs of new by program category non-motorized facilities are shared, with the municipality paying 20% of the local share. The county prepares the necessary agreements for construction, maintenance and participation on costs for these facilities. Only the county’s portion of the costs of joint projects is typically shown until the project is through the design phase and assigned costs are known.

23% 31% 41% 5% Preservation Modernization Expansion Debt Service

Source Inormation Service PS va

Executive Summary • 23 Project Phases The typical highway project is planned, engineered, and built by pro- gressing through the following major phases: • Preliminary Engineering/Phase I – An engineering report involving a project’s geometric design, right-of-way requirements, alternatives analysis, and environmental studies. If projects involve federal funds, Phase I engineering concludes upon receipt of design approval from IDOT of the Project Develop- ment Report (PDR). • Design Engineering/Phase II – Translates the Phase I engineering report into contract plans, specifications and cost estimates for land acquisition and construction as well as execution of local-state joint project agreements. • ROW/Phase II – The acquisition of necessary rights- of-way and easements. In projects involving federal funds, formal negotiations with property owners may not begin until Phase I engineering approval is given by IDOT. • Construction/Phase III – Includes the construction of the project and the associated construction engineering activities such as surveys, staking, inspections, materials testing, checking shop drawings, supervision of contractors, field adjustments and plan revisions, record keeping and documentation, and payments to contractors.

24 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Project Listings

The projects listed on the following pages are in the format of the Capital Program Management System (CPMS), a software application developed for tracking the county’s annual construction program and five-year program. CPMS includes a sixth year for a better fit with the county’s annual budget development schedule.

CPMS serves as a single, combined source of data on the following: • County’s Annual Program (FY ’17: 12/1/16 to 11/30/17) • County’s Planned Program (FY ‘18: 12/1/17 to 11/30/18) • County’s 5-Year Highway Improvement Program (FY ’18 to FY ’22: 12/1/17 to 11/30/22).

The CPMS project alphabetical listing following shows expected expenditures for the program years covered by this document. 478 project records are being tracked in CPMS. Project maps and listings sorted by program priority—Preservation, Modernization and Expansion—are also included in this summary document.

Executive Summary • 25 Reading the PS Printout

Proect penditures in this program period

Proect I o. ork Type this project is classi ed as roadway work Proect penditures paid from MT, MFT, CB and ST funds Proect ame monies deposited into MT, MFT, CB and ST funds

Lake County project’s program priority Thursday, June 08, 2017 Let ate Division of Transportation 11:33:57 am

ummary Transportation Improvement Proram arryforard mounts Program Period: Fiscal Years 2017 to 2022 - Starting 12/1/2016

Selected: All

6-Year 6-Year 6-Year Program PIN Route/From-To Worktype/Cat Project Description Total Cost County Cost County Revenue Date

B-01002a 14th St (1 of 2) Roadway Reconstruction $15,807,000 $6,024,600 $982,400 Jan-2019 IL Rte 131 to Jackson St Modernization

B-01002b 14th St (2 of 2) Resurface Mill and Resurface Roadway $359,300 $359,300 $0 Jan-2019 Jackson St to Sheridan Rd Preservation Project Totals $16,166,300 $6,383,900 $982,400

B-01294 2017 Deicing Liquids Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 $0 Jan-2017 @Various Preservation Project Totals $100,000 $100,000 $0

B-01094a 2017 Patrol 1 Materials (1 of 2) Patrol 1 Materials for Road and Bikepath Maintenance $695,500 $695,500 $125,200 Sep-2016 @Various Preservation

B-01094b 2017 Patrol 1 Materials (2 of 2) Patrol 1 Winter De-iceing materials $1,275,200 $1,275,200 $0 Apr-2017 @Various Preservation Project Totals $1,970,700 $1,970,700 $125,200

B-01439 2017 Pvmt Rejuvenator Roadway $500,000 $500,000 $0 Jan-2017 @Various Preservation Project Totals $500,000 $500,000 $0

B-01322a 2018 Patrol 1 Materials (1 of 2) Patrol 1 Materials for Road and Bikepath Maintenance $816,400 $816,400 $131,500 Sep-2017 @Various Preservation

B-01322b 2018 Patrol 1 Materials (2 of 2) Patrol 1 Winter De-iceing materials $1,313,500 $1,313,500 $0 Apr-2018 @Various Preservation Project Totals $2,129,900 $2,129,900 $131,500

B-01440 2018 Pvmt Rejuvenator Roadway $500,000 $500,000 $0 Jan-2018 @Various Preservation Project Totals $500,000 $500,000 $0

U:\CPMS2000\cpmsdata\FY1722\Working Files\FY1722_5a.mdb - Ver. 5a, 5/31/2017 4:31:58 PM Page 1 of 52

totals for multiple-entry projects indicates project with multiple entries what’s being done on the project

26 • 2017 - 2022 Highway Improvement Program Lake County Thursday, June 08, 2017 Division of Transportation 11:33:57 am

Summary Transportation Improvement Program - Carryforward Amounts Program Period: Fiscal Years 2017 to 2022 - Starting 12/1/2016