DOCSLIB.ORG

IT-96-23-T& IT-96-23/1-T Date: 22 February 2001 International

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IT-96-23-T& IT-96-23/1-T Date: 22 February 2001 International UNITED NATIONS IT-96-23-T& Case No.: International Tribunal for the IT-96-23/1-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 22 February 2001 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba, Presiding Judge David Hunt Judge Fausto Pocar Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 22 February 2001 PROSECUTOR v. DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC RADOMIR KOVAC AND ZORAN VUKOVIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Dirk Ryneveld Mrs. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff Ms. Peggy Kuo Mr. Daryl Mundis Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Slavi{a Prodanovic and Ms. Maja Pilipovic for the accused Dragoljub Kunarac Mr. Momir Kolesar and Mr. Vladimir Rajic for the accused Radomir Kovac Mr. Goran Jovanovic and Ms. Jelena Lopicic for the accused Zoran Vukovic i CONTENTS I. GLOSSARY OF TERMS, PLACES AND ABBREVIATIONS................................6 A. Terms and places................................................................................................................................................ 6 B. Briefs of parties and Indictments................................................................................................................... 7 C. Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................................... 8 II. THE CHARGES AGAINST THE ACCUSED........................................................10 A. The accused Dragoljub Kunarac.................................................................................................................10 B. The accused Radomir Kovac ........................................................................................................................13 C. The accused Zoran Vukovic..........................................................................................................................14 III. EVIDENCE................................................................................................................16 A. General background........................................................................................................................................16 B. Role of the accused...........................................................................................................................................31 1. Background of the accused ............................................................................................................................31 (a) Dragoljub Kunarac ..................................................................................................................................31 (b) Radomir Kova~........................................................................................................................................32 (c) Zoran Vukovi} .........................................................................................................................................32 2. Evidence related to the charges.....................................................................................................................32 (a) FWS-87......................................................................................................................................................32 (i) Testimony of witness FWS-87..........................................................................................................32 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................39 (iii) Defence evidence of the accused Dragoljub Kunarac................................................................42 a. From 7 July 1992 until 21 July 1992...........................................................................................43 b. From 23 July 1992 until 26 July 1992........................................................................................47 c. 2 August 1992 .................................................................................................................................52 d. From 3 August 1992 from 5 pm until 8 August 1992 ..............................................................56 e. Dragoljub Kunarac’s visit at Karaman’s house .........................................................................60 (iv) Defence evidence related to the accused Radomir Kova~.........................................................61 (v) FWS-87’s alleged relationship with Kova~...................................................................................61 (vi) Conditions at Radomir Kova~’s apartment ..................................................................................65 (vii) Removal of FWS-87 and A.S. from Radomir Kova~’s apartment..........................................67 (viii) Defence evidence related to the accused Zoran Vukovi} ......................................................68 (b) FWS-75 .....................................................................................................................................................69 (i) Testimony of FWS-75........................................................................................................................69 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................76 (iii) Defence evidence related to the accused Dragoljub Kunarac...................................................78 (iv) Defence evidence related to the accused Radomir Kova~.........................................................78 (c) A.S..............................................................................................................................................................80 (i) Testimony of A.S.................................................................................................................................80 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................82 (d) D.B.............................................................................................................................................................83 Case No.: IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T 22 February 2001 ii (i) Testimony of D.B................................................................................................................................83 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................87 (iii) Defence evidence..............................................................................................................................87 (e) FWS-50......................................................................................................................................................88 (i) Testimony of FWS-50........................................................................................................................88 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................91 (iii) Defence evidence..............................................................................................................................91 (f) FWS-191....................................................................................................................................................94 (i) Testimony of FWS-191......................................................................................................................94 (ii) Supporting evidence..........................................................................................................................98 (iii) Defence evidence..............................................................................................................................99 (g) FWS-186................................................................................................................................................ 101 (i) Testimony of FWS-186....................................................................................................................101 (ii) Supporting evidence........................................................................................................................104 (h) FWS-190................................................................................................................................................ 105 (i) Testimony of FWS-190....................................................................................................................105 (ii) Supporting evidence........................................................................................................................108 (i) FWS-95 ................................................................................................................................................... 108 (i) Testimony of FWS-95......................................................................................................................108 (ii) Supporting evidence........................................................................................................................111 (j) FWS-48 ..................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Korea-South Korea Relations: Never Mind the Nukes?
    North Korea-South Korea Relations: Never Mind The Nukes? Aidan Foster-Carter Leeds University, UK Almost a year after charges that North Korea has a second, covert nuclear program plunged the Peninsula into intermittent crisis, inter-Korean ties appear surprisingly unaffected. The past quarter saw sustained and brisk exchanges on many fronts, seemingly regardless of this looming shadow. Although Pyongyang steadfastly refuses to discuss the nuclear issue with Seoul bilaterally, the fact that six-party talks on this topic were held in Beijing in late August – albeit with no tangible progress, nor even any assurance that such dialogue will continue – is perhaps taken (rightly or wrongly) as meaning the issue is now under control. At all events, between North and South Korea it is back to business as usual – or even full steam ahead. While (at least in this writer’s view) closer inter-Korean relations are in themselves a good thing, one can easily imagine scenarios in which this process may come into conflict with U.S. policy. Should the six-party process fail or break down, or if Pyongyang were to test a bomb or declare itself a nuclear power, then there would be strong pressure from Washington for sanctions in some form. Indeed, alongside the six- way process, the U.S. is already pursuing an interdiction policy with its Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), which Japan has joined but South Korea, pointedly, has not. Relinking of cross-border roads and railways, or the planned industrial park at Kaesong (with power and water from the South), are examples of initiatives which might founder, were the political weather around the Peninsula to turn seriously chilly.
    [Show full text]
  • “Nuremberg” Tribunal, and Comparative Historicizing of War Criminals Tribunals Studies
    European Studies Vol.20 (2020) 99-101 Panel Session Current judicial interpretations about “Tokyo” and “Nuremberg” Tribunal, and comparative historicizing of war criminals tribunals studies Kensuke Shiba My name is Kensuke Shiba. I’m honored by the preceding making for a total of 13 trials, as is tacitly understood from the introduction. I feel that today’s international symposium is of use of the plural form. However, the subsequent trials had in fact major significance. Having studied the Nuremberg trials as a been forgotten for some reason until recently. Today, from the historian, I have a few comments on the papers delivered today. perspectives of International Criminal Law or the international From a historical perspective as well, I felt that Judge Liu’s code of criminal procedure, experts are gathering to review the talk, in particular, was of extraordinary importance, as it was Tokyo and Nuremberg trials further; in the case of the latter, founded on modern legal practice. For some time we have been however, based on the above issues, I feel that the approach discussing the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials; considering how the thereto must emphasize the subsequent trials alongside the Nuremberg trials have been perceived in Germany, it seems that a International Military Tribunal and include the subsequent trials movement toward reconsidering the image of the trials as a whole when making a comparison with the Tokyo trials as well. In appeared in the late 1980s or just before the end of the Cold War. Germany, even laypeople seem to be developing an awareness of In fact, something that I emphasized in my own book (The a more complex image of the Nuremberg war criminal trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Bailey Warren Senior Honors Thesis Project.Pdf
    1 Foreword “Dimitri Mitropoulos was asked if he could explain the extraordinary effect his conducting had on orchestra and audience alike, and he answered that he wouldn’t even try to explain it, for fear that he might become like the centipede who was asked by a humble little bug which of his hundred legs moved first when he walked. The centipede, responding to the admiration with immense pride, began to analyze the question, and has not walked since.” This excerpt is from Madeleine L’Engle’s book A Circle of Quiet. In the same chapter as ​ ​ this quote, she explains how when Beethoven performed his sonatas and was immediately asked what his sonatas meant, he simply sat down and played them once ​ ​ more. What L’Engle is trying to get at is if one could truly explain their art, there would have been no reason to create the art in the first place. In response to Mitropoulos’ quote she says, “we’re apt to get tangled up in legs when we begin to analyze the creative process.” Throughout the process of creating this album I have embedded a lot of myself into the project. So much of it has become inherently who I am that I feel as if I have become too close to it. This is the first creative project that I have ever completed to this caliber, and the first collection of musical works that is thoroughly mine. Putting it into words doesn’t ​ ​ seem to do it justice. Analysis can only do so much in describing the nuances of art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hardening Plight of the American Ex-Convict
    WHEN THE PAST IS A PRISON: THE HARDENING PLIGHT OF THE AMERICAN EX-CONVICT Roger Roots University of Nevada, Las Vegas Department of Sociology ABSTRACT Today’s American criminal justice system is generating more ex-criminals than ever before, due to increasingly punitive sentencing, the increasing criminalization of formerly noncriminal acts, and the increasing federalization of criminal matters. At the same time, advances in record-keeping and computer technology have made life more difficult for ex-convicts. This article examines the hardships faced by American ex- convicts reentering the non-custodial community both at present and in the past. It concludes that modern ex-convicts face more difficulties than those of past generations, because 1) a greater number of laws that restrict their occupational and social lives, and 2) better data collection and transfer among criminal justice jurisdictions make evading or escaping from one’s criminal past more difficult. The result of these coalescing trends is that American society is increasingly forming a hierarchical order of citizenship, with long-term negative economic and social consequences for both ex-offenders and the broader community. 2 INTRODUCTION Criminal convictions have always carried collateral consequences in addition to their formal penalties. During much of American history—and, indeed, the history of the English legal system—convicted felons suffered a loss of social standing, disenfranchisement, and in some cases, “civil death,” a state in which they were denied all rights of citizenship including marriage, inheritance, and public office. In contrast, contemporary American ex-convicts retain their citizenship, their rights of property ownership, and their marriage and family rights, but are denied a host of other rights and privileges such as bearing arms and working in various occupations.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostorni Plan Područja Posebnih Obilježja Za Područje Od Značaja Za Hercegovačko Neretvansku Županiju „Park Prirode Hutovo Blato“
    PROSTORNI PLAN PODRUČJA POSEBNIH OBILJEŽJA ZA PODRUČJE OD ZNAČAJA ZA HERCEGOVAČKO NERETVANSKU ŽUPANIJU „PARK PRIRODE HUTOVO BLATO“ za razdoblje od 2013. do 2023. godine ~ PROSTORNA OSNOVA ~ Mostar, listopad / oktobar 2013. PROSTORNI PLAN PODRUČJA POSEBNIH OBILJEŽJA ZA PODRUČJE OD ZNAČAJA ZA HERCEGOVAČKO NERETVANSKU ŽUPANIJU „PARK PRIRODE HUTOVO BLATO“ za razdoblje od 2013. do 2023. godine ~ PROSTORNA OSNOVA ~ NOSITELJ PRIPREME PLANA: Ministarstvo graditeljstva i prostornog uređenja HNŽ/K Stjepana Radića 3/II Tel/fax: +387 36 324‐324; 312‐190 NOSITELJ IZRADE PLANA: ecoplan d.o.o. Mostar Dr Ante Starčevića, bb 88 000 Mostar Tel/fax: +387 36 397‐400; 397‐410 e‐mail: eco‐plan@eco‐plan.ba web stranica: www: eco‐plan.ba NARUČITELJ: AGENCIJA ZA PODRUČJE SLIVA JADRANSKOG MORA KROZ FPIT FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO POLJOPRIVREDE, VODOPRIVREDE I ŠUMARSTVA STRUČNI PLANERSKI TIM: Odgovorni planer: dr.sc. Borislav Puljić, dipl.ing.arh. Koordinator projekta: Mirela Šetka Prlić, dipl.ing.građ. Prostorni planeri i suradnici: dr.sc. Stjepan Mišetić. dipl.biol dr.sc. Ivan Martinić, dipl.ing.šum. dr.sc. Ferdo Bašić, dipl.ing.agr. Alen Kereković, dipl.ing.geol. Ivan Slišković, dipl.ing.građ. Jakov Dulčić, dipl.biol. Iva Vidaković, prof.biol. Mijo Terkeš,, dipl.ing.el. Sanja Jelavić, dipl‐ing.građ. Mirela Šetka Prlić, dipl.ing.građ. Marija Rakić, dipl.ing.arh. Anđelka Mikulić, dipl.ing.građ. Marko Trogrlić, dipl.ing.građ. Elena Dragoje, dipl.ing.građ. Mirjana Laganin, dipl.oecc. Danijela Mandić. dipl.ing.građ. Martina Penava, Dipl.ing.arh. Nada Komadina, ing.arh. BR. PROJEKTA: 266/12 BR. UGOVORA: I‐205‐266/12 DIREKTOR „ecoplan“ d.o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutor V Milorad Krnojelac to Trial Chamber II, 17 June 1998
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-97-25-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date: 15 March 2002 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Original: English Since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge David Hunt, Presiding Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Liu Daqun Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgment of: 15 March 2002 PROSECUTOR v. MILORAD KRNOJELAC JUDGMENT Counsel for the Prosecutor: Ms Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff Ms Peggy Kuo Mr William Smith Counsel for the Accused: Mr Mihajlo Bakrac Mr Miroslav Vasi} 1 Case No: IT-97-25-T 15 March 2002 I. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES............................................................................. 4 II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 AND ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE........................................................................................................... 7 A. Facts relevant to the general requirements of Article 3 and Article 5 of the Statute 7 B. General requirements under Article 3 of the Statute .............................................. 20 C. General requirements under Article 5 of the Statute .............................................. 21 D. Findings in respect of the general requirements of Articles 3 and 5 of the Statute 24 III. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE......................................................................................................... 27 IV. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMIC REFORM at a STANDSTILL: a FLOCK of “Gs” in SEARCH of GLOBAL FINANCIAL STABILITY by Roy Culpeper, President, the North-South Institute
    SYSTEMIC REFORM AT A STANDSTILL: A FLOCK OF “Gs” IN SEARCH OF GLOBAL FINANCIAL STABILITY by Roy Culpeper, President, The North-South Institute Commonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Conference on Developing Countries and Global Financial Architecture Marlborough House London, 22-23 June 2000 1 SYSTEMIC REFORM AT A STANDSTILL: A FLOCK OF “Gs” IN SEARCH OF GLOBAL FINANCIAL STABILITY by Roy Culpeper, President, The North-South Institute1 Introduction The subject of “Global Governance” became topical in the 1990s with a rash of financial crises, the most far-reaching and dramatic one having started in East Asia in mid-1997 and spread around the world before subsiding during the course of 1999. It is worth recalling, however, that the subject of Global Governance has been a hardy perennial since the breakdown of the original Bretton Woods system a quarter century ago. Its antecedents include the debate on the New International Economic Order in the 1970s; the North-South Summits of the early 1980s; the UNCED negotiations in Rio de Janeiro in 1992; and the chain of ensuing UN conferences throughout the decade – the Vienna conference on Human Rights, the Social Summit at Copenhagen, the Beijing Conference on gender and development, and the Cairo conference on Population and Development. While these discussions have produced a few tangible results, their impact on Global Governance has been minimal. Although it may sound unpleasant to believers in the rationality of a more equitable world order, perhaps a large reason for the failure of these many attempts to reform the global order is that they have been dominated by the poor and the powerless, while the rich and powerful have not been persuaded of the need for significant changes to the status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntactic Structure in Memory
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses April 2021 There and Gone Again: Syntactic Structure In Memory Caroline Andrews University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics Commons Recommended Citation Andrews, Caroline, "There and Gone Again: Syntactic Structure In Memory" (2021). Doctoral Dissertations. 2090. https://doi.org/10.7275/19826911 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/2090 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses There and Gone Again: Syntactic Structure In Memory Caroline Andrews Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics Commons THERE AND GONE AGAIN: SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE IN MEMORY A Dissertation Presented by CAROLINE ANDREWS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2021 Linguistics c Copyright by Caroline Andrews 2021 All Rights Reserved THERE AND GONE AGAIN: SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE IN MEMORY A Dissertation Presented by CAROLINE ANDREWS Approved as to style and content by: Brian Dillon, Chair John Kingston, Member Adrian Staub, Member Joe Pater, Department Chair Linguistics To my parents and my brother, who have taught me so many things, not the least of which were courage and curiosity.
    [Show full text]
  • PATTI SMITH Eighteen Stations MARCH 3 – APRIL 16, 2016
    /robertmillergallery For immediate release: [email protected] @RMillerGallery 212.366.4774 /robertmillergallery PATTI SMITH Eighteen Stations MARCH 3 – APRIL 16, 2016 New York, NY – February 17, 2016. Robert Miller Gallery is pleased to announce Eighteen Stations, a special project by Patti Smith. Eighteen Stations revolves around the world of M Train, Smith’s bestselling book released in 2015. M Train chronicles, as Smith describes, “a roadmap to my life,” as told from the seats of the cafés and dwellings she has worked from globally. Reflecting the themes and sensibility of the book, Eighteen Stations is a meditation on the act of artistic creation. It features the artist’s illustrative photographs that accompany the book’s pages, along with works by Smith that speak to art and literature’s potential to offer hope and consolation. The artist will be reading from M Train at the Gallery throughout the run of the exhibition. Patti Smith (b. 1946) has been represented by Robert Miller Gallery since her joint debut with Robert Mapplethorpe, Film and Stills, opened at its 724 Fifth Avenue location in 1978. Recent solo exhibitions at the Gallery include Veil (2009) and A Pythagorean Traveler (2006). In 2014 Rockaway Artist Alliance and MoMA PS1 mounted Patti Smith: Resilience of the Dreamer at Fort Tilden, as part of a special project recognizing the ongoing recovery of the Rockaway Peninsula, where the artist has a home. Smith's work has been the subject of solo exhibitions at institutions worldwide including the Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto (2013); Detroit Institute of Arts (2012); Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford (2011); Fondation Cartier pour l’Art Contemporaine, Paris (2008); Haus der Kunst, Munich (2003); and The Andy Warhol Museum (2002).
    [Show full text]
  • ICN1886-04-08.Pdf
    mm jai:ilia''qiii^ sbbviiigVflraternlty,f' Is alwaya welooine ,to Dry Oooils.—Bnrnham & Company. Legal. Two WMk)B (h>m '.to-day Preatdent Mrs. Race Is very slok. iKDBR OP PUBLICATION.-8TATK OP WlUetta of the Agricultural college A. D. Bnirdsley's father la visiting _ MlohlaaMichiganu, ..In. th.u Circuit Court for tho Thursdnjr, April 1, W hlriri. County of Initham-Iiam-IIIi CliancoryCliancory,. will addriesis the ol lib on "Moslems Mrs. A. O. Walker of Detroit Is Lillian Oamblo, Complainant,'Complainant,)) &nd Mormons." As this will probably VB, Fanners* Club. ipuoh better. Kll Oamblo, Dofondant. be the laafr regular meeting for.some It satlaraclorily appearing to thin court by Miss Luclna Beardsley was home affidavit on fllo that tlio dcfondant, £11 aambto, . dtUB BooMB, March 27, ISSis. weeks thiere will be a large attendance. over Sunday. ia not > roaldent of this atato, hut retidoa at the • The oluti^^^^^^^ full up UKlay. Ladles eapeoially Invited. village or Nunda,iu thoHtatool Now York, on. .1 Chas. McKuigbt Is going to Holly moUon of K. D, Lewia, compltlnant'a aollcltor. Nothlhpnew In inarket.reporta. Quite L. H. Ivjiss, Secretary. for treatment. It la ordered that tho aald dulCndant, £11 Gamble, Claude and Etta West have returned Display of Spring Novelties excels that of any cause hla appoaranco to bo entorod horcln wltbln a quantity of seeds graced the tables four montha from tho data of thla order, and in For neuralgia, rbeumatism,'lumbago, from their visit at Manistee. and the meeting was one of much li> previous season, in point of elegance and var­ caao of hla appoaranco that ho cauae his anawer gout,' Bwellinga, burns, wounds, etc., There will be a mum social at Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • International Economic and Financial Cooperation: New Issues, New Actors, New Responses
    International Economic and Financial Cooperation: New Issues, New Actors, New Responses Geneva Reports on the World Economy 6 International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB) International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies 11 A Avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva Switzerland Tel (41 22) 734 9548 Fax (41 22) 733 3853 Website: www.icmb.ch © 2004 International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Centre for Economic Policy Research 90-98 Goswell Road London EC1V 7RR UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7878 2900 Fax: +44 (0)20 7878 2999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cepr.org British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 1 898128 84 7 International Economic and Financial Cooperation: New Issues, New Actors, New Responses Geneva Reports on the World Economy 6 Peter B Kenen Council on Foreign Relations and Princeton University Jeffrey R Shafer Citigroup and former US Under Secretary of the Treasury Nigel L Wicks CRESTCo and former Head of HM Treasury Charles Wyplosz Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva and CEPR ICMB INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MONETARY AND BANKING STUDIES CIMB CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DETUDES MONETAIRES ET BANCAIRES International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB) The International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies was created in 1973 as an inde- pendent, non-profit foundation. It is associated with Geneva’s Graduate Institute of International Studies. Its aim is to foster exchange of views between the financial sector, cen- tral banks and academics on issues of common interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I List of Species and Habitats
    Annex I List of species and habitats No. Appendix II species Gornja Gornja Ulog Other source and Neretva Neretva EIA notes Phase 1 EIA Phase 2 EIA 1. Canis lupus p 58, pp 59-62 p 58 p 52 Emerald – Standard Data Form 2. Ursus arctos (Ursidae) p 58, pp 59-62 p 58 p 52 Emerald – Standard Data Form 3. 1 Lutra lutra p 58 p 58 - 4. Euphydryas aurinia p 59-62 p 57 - Emerald – Standard Data Form 5. 2 Phengaris arion (Maculinea p 59-62 p 57 - arion) 6. Bombina variegata p 57 p 55 - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA Emerald – Standard Data Form 7. Hyla arborea - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 8. Rana Dalmatina - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 9. 3 Bufotes viridis - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU:ATRA 10. Lacerta agilis p 57 p 55 - 11. Lacerta viridis p 57 p 55 - 12. Natrix tessellata p 57 p 55 - 13. Vipera ammodytes - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 14. Zamenis longissimus (as - - - Herpetoloska baza Elaphe longissima) BHHU: ATRA 15. Coronella austriaca - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 16. Algyroides nigropunctatus - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 17. 4 Podarcis melisellensis - - - Herpetoloska baza BHHU: ATRA 18. Cerambyx cerdo pp 59-62 p 58 - Emerald – Standard Data Form 19. Anthus trivialis p 57 p 55 - (Motacillidae) 20. Carduelis cannabina p 57 p 55 - 21. Carduelis carduelis p 57 p 55 - 1 The description of fauna in the EIAs for species 1, 2 and 3 is based on the local hunting documentation, on species likely to be present in such habitats, and on a description of species mentioned in the project undertaken to establish the Emerald network in BIH.
    [Show full text]