Ref: PNW00005 HMCA\Topic: Outer North East

Subject: Site in the plan

Site: HG2-226 - Land to the east of

Agree with proposed use? No

Soundness

Consider the plan sound? No

Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF

Changes required to make sound: n/a

Issues

Issue: Schools The site requirements document acknowledges the need for a two form entry primary school on site. There is no other supporting evidence or planning for this provision other than this simple statement of intent.

Similarly, no initial or forward planning has been considered for Secondary provision. Not all of the residents of the 1080 new homes will require primary provision, some will have older children that require Secondary School education. Furthermore, the increase will cumulative year on year; a two form entry Primary School will generate an additional need for 60 Secondary School places each year. Wetherby has one 11-18 school, Wetherby High School. The provision for an additional 60 places in each year group has not been considered by the plan. Wetherby High School is a school that has been judged to 'Require Improvement' in its last two Ofsted inspections (Most recently inspected 7th-8th October 2014). A school that 'requires improvement' is not well placed for expansion, nor is it likely to have capacity to cope with increased numbers while it's focus is on securing at least 'good' educational provision. This is aspect of the plan is not positively prepared and there is no evidence to suggest that long-term educational provision will be in place within the proposed time frame.

Issue: Local services The site fails all the accessibility criteria and the locations severance with Wetherby can not be resolved. This is stated in the Publication Draft Plan Allocation document (SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125). Wetherby has a population of 19,979 (2011 census data). There are already plans to build 165 homes at the Sandbeck Lane site and 325 new homes at the Spofforth Hill site (http://bellway-spofforthhill.co.uk). This plan would add an additional 1080 homes. This is a total of 1245 new homes in Wetherby; an increase in population by 14.6% (based on the Leeds ratio of 2.34 persons per household. The 2011 census identifies that Leeds has a population of 751,500 people living in 320,600 households). The Publication Draft Plan Allocation document (SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125) also concludes that Wetherby is the only major settlement accessible from the site. Wetherby does not have sufficient access to job opportunities, medical and dental care, schools, or public services for an additional 2527 people (2.34 x 1080 homes) living at the proposed site. Furthermore, the site is 2.7 miles from the centre of Wetherby and 18 miles from the nearest city, Leeds and transport links are insufficient. The roads and transport infrastructure in Wetherby and surrounding areas already struggle with the current capacity. Therefore this is not an appropriate alternative site to the Headley Hall development, which had access to Bradford (population 293,277) and Leeds (population 751,500).

The proposed development would increase the population of Wetherby by 12.65% alone. Yorkshire Water have noted that 'there is very limited capacity at Wetherby for new development' and that 'it is particularly important that sites which represent a 10% or greater increase in population served by the works should take into account available sewerage and WwTW capacity.' (The Publication Draft Plan Allocation document (SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125)). The current plan has not provided sufficient evidence that there is water and sewage capacity for a development of this size. There is also no evidence in the plan of consideration for other utilities to service a large number of homes at the site.

The improvements to infrastructure has not been positively prepared and it is not reasonable to assume that this lack of infrastructure can be overcome to accommodate such a population increase to the outer north-east of Wetherby. A development of this size is not justifiable or in line with the core strategy, as there is insufficient access to job opportunities and public services for the proposed new population.

Issue: Greenbelt The site builds on land that is open countryside and is safeguarded by rural land policy (RL1) within the UDP. It should not be considered before all Brownfield sites have been exhausted. This has been extremely successful in the city of York, where plans have been made to build on the British Sugar Factory site and Terry's Chocolate factory. Brownfield sits have better infrastructure and access to services, as well as protecting this area of open countryside. This is not consistent with National Policy and not justified use of safeguarded land.

Issue: Conservation and heritage The plan fails to consider the impact to the Grade 2 listed buildings less than one kilometre to the north-east at Ingmanthorpe Hall. The county boundary runs along the north-east of the site along Racecourse Approach and Ingmanthorpe Hall is located behind this in North Yorkshire. Therefore, the proposed site should be considered by North Yorkshire Authorities as well as those in . There is no evidence of communication or consultation with North Yorkshire Authorities on a development that impacts a listed building approximately 750 metres to the north-east. This is failure to positively prepare. Issue: Ecology/Landscape/Trees In the Publication Draft Plan Allocation document (SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125) notes that the land is open countryside and is safeguarded by rural land policy (RL1) within the UDP. However, it wrongly concludes that the development of the site would not be unduly detrimental to the character of the area, siting that there is currently several urbanising developments such as the adjacent Young Offenders Institute already in the area. While this may be the case when viewed from the south of the site (York Road) looking back towards the site location, when viewed from the North-East and East (Racecourse Approach, Sandbeck Lane, Ingmanthorpe and Swinnow Park Land, and when entering Wetherby from the B1224) these buildings are not currently visible and the area is predominantly open countryside and not urbanised development. The site has a right of public access which is regularly used by many members of the public and current residents of Wetherby to access and enjoy the open countryside in the area. There are several well used public footpaths and bridleways in the surrounding area where this site can be seen. Development on the site would be detrimental to the character of and access to open countryside. In illustration of this, it was a planning requirement that the negative impact of the Wetherby Services development was reduced by banking and planting so that it did not have a detrimental effect on the character of the open countryside. This plan fails to address or consider the impact of 1080 buildings on the landscape. The plans are not effective or prepared to address this issue, nor is it justified to make use of open countryside when Brownfield sites are available.

Parts of site are adjacent to Sand Beck and are therefore in Flood Zones 2 and 3. It is known that developments increase flood risk elsewhere, particularly developments in open country side. Development of this site reduces the opportunity for infiltration and ground water flow and increases the amount of surface water run-off, as such an increased risk of flooding elsewhere. This is already a problem on The York road, which has been flooded on several occasions. This development slopes towards the South and would increase flood risks. The plans are not positively prepared to overcome this issue and it is insufficient to assume that any would-be developer will address this.

Legal compliance

Consider the plan legally compliant? Don't know

Legal compliance issues addressed:

Local Development. Scheme Statement of community involvement Duty to co-operate Consultation of statutory bodies

Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act Sustainability appraisal Town and Country Planning Regs

Comments on legal compliance: n/a

Future updates

Take part in public examination? Be informed of submission to examination? Be informed of adoption of the plan? Submitter details Agent details Ref PDP10016 Ref Title Mr Title Forename John Forename Surname Bates Surname Address 1 4 Montagu Mews Address 1 Address 2 Ingmanthorpe Address 2 Address 3 Address 3 Town Wetherby Town PostCode LS22 5PY PostCode School report

Wetherby High School Lane, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS22 6JS

Inspection dates 7–8 October 2014

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Sixth form provision Requires improvement 3

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Too few students in Key Stages 3 and 4 make  Not all teachers are following the school’s new good progress from their starting points. By the marking and assessment policy. Students do not time they leave Year 11, standards in GCSE always know what they need to do to improve, examinations are average, but fell in 2014. particularly in mathematics.  The proportion of students reaching the highest  The sixth form requires improvement. Teaching grades in examinations is below average, across subjects is too variable in quality. Too few especially in mathematics. The achievement of the students reach the highest grades in AS and A- most able requires improvement. levels. Work, particularly for the most able, lacks  Teaching has not enabled students to make good challenge. progress, particularly in mathematics.  Leadership of the sixth form is not yet good. Expectations of what students are capable of Improvements are evident but new leadership has achieving are not always high enough. not yet resulted in more rapid improvement.  Information about students’ past achievement is not always used well to match work to students’ varying abilities.

The school has the following strengths  The new executive headteacher and acting  Previously wide variances in the attainment of headteacher have acted swiftly to reverse the disadvantaged students compared to non- decline in students’ achievement in all key stages. disadvantaged students in the school and They have enlisted the full support of staff. nationally, have significantly narrowed. The pupil  Governance is very strong taking firm action to premium funding is used to good effect. improve the school’s leadership. They challenge  Behaviour has improved and is good. Students feel leadership and teachers in a timely manner. very safe and acknowledge that the school is  Teachers are eager to improve their own improving quickly. Attendance is above average. teaching. Teaching in Key Stages 3 and 4 is  Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural improving quickly. More students are now making understanding is good. Students’ awareness of good progress, particularly in English. British values, along with that of other cultures worldwide, is well supported through a strong programme of assemblies. Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 2 of 10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 44 lessons and part lessons across the school, including two that were observed jointly with senior leaders. Coaching sessions and an assembly were also observed.  Formal discussions were held with the executive headteacher and acting headteacher, governors, a group of parents, middle and senior leaders, three groups of students, two teachers new to the profession and a representative of the local authority. Additional informal discussions were held with students in lessons and at break times.  A scrutiny of students’ work was carried out during lessons and as a separate exercise to identify the current progress of students and trends over time.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents. These included those relating to the performance of staff, the progress students in all year groups make over time, safeguarding, special educational needs, child protection procedures, minutes of the meetings of the governing body, external reviews by a national leader of education and those that relate to school leaders’ own view of the recent achievement of students and school improvement.  Inspectors observed behaviour in lessons, at break time and in the school canteen and assessed the quality of provision for inclusion and its policies and procedures.  The inspectors took account of the 75 responses to Ofsted’s online survey (Parent View), 45 responses to the staff questionnaire, two letters and two emails from parents, and a telephone conversation with a parent.

Inspection team

Colin Scott, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

Mary Lanovy-Taylor Additional Inspector

Andrew Henderson Additional Inspector

Lynne Selkirk Additional Inspector

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 3 of 10

Full report

Information about this school

 Wetherby High School is a smaller than average sized secondary school.  The proportion of disadvantaged students eligible for extra support from the pupil premium funding is below the national average. The pupil premium is additional funding for those students who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those children who are looked after by the local authority.  The school makes very limited use of alternative provision, including `The Works’ in Key Stage 4, `PEP’, the shared provision from the locality partnership group and a ‘hospital home’ agreement.  The school is part of a soft federation with Carr Manor Community School in Leeds who provide it with leadership support and challenge.  The executive headteacher took up post in May 2014 and the acting headteacher took up post in September 2014.  Most students are of White British heritage. A minority come from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds.  The school has recently gained the International School Award from the British Council for its work supporting international cultural awareness among its students.  The proportion of students with special educational needs supported through school action is below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also below average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations students’ attainment and progress.

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching in Key Stages 3 and 4, in order to raise students’ achievement, particularly in mathematics, by ensuring that:  expectations of what students are capable of achieving are high, especially for the most able, so that the proportion of students reaching the highest grades in GSCE examinations increases  teachers use information about students’ past achievement to plan and provide work that is matched closely to their needs and abilities and is interesting and challenging enough so that they always work hard and do their best  all teachers apply the new marking and assessment policy so that students know what they need to do so improve and deepen their understanding of their work, particularly in mathematics.

 Improve the achievement of students in the sixth form so that the proportion of students reaching the higher grades in AS a A-level examinations is at least in line with the national average by:  ensuring that teaching in all subjects is good and consistently challenges students, especially the most able  further developing leadership of the sixth form so that the quality of teaching improves at a quicker rate.

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 4 of 10

Inspection judgements

The leadership and management are good

 The executive headteacher and acting headteacher are quickly and effectively reversing the decline in students’ achievement seen in 2014. They have successfully enlisted the full support of staff, who are overwhelmingly confident in their ability to bring about improvement quickly. One member of staff noted, ‘staff are on board and understand what needs to be done’. This is why the vast majority attend the voluntary weekly teacher training sessions on offer.  Leaders at all levels and the governors are responding to the higher expectations of them. Leaders, including most middle leaders have an extremely honest and accurate view of the school’s performance and know precisely what needs to be done in order to improve the outcomes for students. As a result, change is taking place quickly. Leaders are now clearly focused on ensuring that all teachers have consistently high expectations of students.  The leadership of teaching is good. Leaders are extremely accurate and realistic in their view of the quality of teaching. Reviews of staff performance are astute, regular and detailed. Immediate programmes of support are put in place to improve teaching. Teaching is improving quickly, especially in English, and students are making better progress as a result. Leaders know, however, that despite improvements, some inconsistencies in teaching remain. Not all teachers yet adhere to the new marking and assessment policy particularly in mathematics.  Leaders ensure that any additional government funding is used to good effect. Previous gaps in the attainment of disadvantaged students supported by the pupil premium compared to non-disadvantaged students, for example, have successfully narrowed. Year 7 catch-up funding helps those students with lower than expected levels of attainment in literacy, particularly reading, and is enabling them to make good progress and catch up with their peers.  The local authority has supported the governors and new leaders well in bringing about more rapid improvements. Before the executive headteacher and acting headteacher took up their posts, they commissioned a report by a national leader of education, highlighting key areas where improvements were needed.  Leaders have strengthened their approach to managing students’ behaviour. New routines and higher expectations have already resulted in less disruption to learning in classrooms. Students are happy in school. Any discrimination or bullying is tackled swiftly. The number of fixed-term exclusions has reduced and more students are coming to school more regularly. This is helping to improve students’ achievement.  Leaders have made significant changes to the curriculum. It now offers a more appropriate match to students’ needs and to the skills of the teachers. As a result, it now offers better equality of opportunity.  Support for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding across all year groups is good. Students’ awareness of British values, along with that of other cultures worldwide, is well supported through a strong programme of assemblies. The recently introduced Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme, to which around 120 students across the school have signed up, is helping to ensure students develop a stronger awareness of both cultural and community issues.  Leaders ensure that the very few students who access alternative education make good progress and attend well.  Students in Year 11 and in the sixth form are guided well in their decisions as to which courses to choose. They are well prepared for their early careers and future aspirations.  A small, but significant, number of parents are yet to be fully convinced by the changes recently made to improve the school. Inspection evidence shows the rapid and positive impact of new leadership. School leaders are now working successfully to communicate this message across the whole-school community.  Leaders are ensuring that the sixth form is improving, but changes in leadership means that improvements so far have taken place at a steadier rate. The school’s senior leadership are now strengthening the capacity of sixth form leadership, including by seeking support from the local authority.  The governance of the school:  Governors have taken firm action to improve the school’s leadership. They are clear in their belief of high standards and good progress. Governors hold a clear vision for the school’s future, ethos and new direction. They have welcomed the support they have received from the local authority, which has enabled them to become much more effective in their roles.  The governing body knows the school well, is knowledgeable about the data which shows how well the school is doing, including in comparison with others nationally. They are now fully informed by leaders of all aspects of the school’s work so that they are able to challenge staff effectively and in a timely manner. This includes a good understanding of the quality of teaching. They know that while teaching Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 5 of 10

is improving, it is not yet good overall.  Governors ensure that staff do not automatically progress through the pay scales and are diligent in checking the performance of staff before allowing such progression.

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

Behaviour  The behaviour of students is good. Students say that since the arrival of new senior leaders, they are much happier. They understand clearly the high expectations senior leaders have of their behaviour and say that any classroom disruption is now rare. A typical statement was, ‘last year was the worst year in my school life but this year it’s been really good’.  Students are well dressed, punctual to lessons, considerate of others and aware of all of the diverse communities which make up modern British society. They care about their school and arrive well equipped for learning. There is no litter and graffiti is non-existent.  Relationships between staff and students are caring and productive. This is helping to foster an ambitious working ethos in most classrooms. Staff manage corridor and outdoor behaviour well. Teachers mostly follow the school’s system of behaviour management but some students recognise that occasionally, a few teachers are more lax in their approach to managing behaviour.  Students’ attitudes to learning are positive. When the activities in lessons lack challenge, however, a few students lose interest in learning.  Parents and students speak highly of the new coaching methods. These coaching sessions, made up of small groups of young people from across the year groups and supported by a member of staff, enable students to discuss their weekly successes and any anxieties with their peers.  A minority of parents who responded to the online survey, Parent View, still believe that students’ behaviour is not managed well. Evidence of behaviour seen by inspectors, along with the views of students who spoke independently with inspectors and the school’s records of incidents of poor behaviour show that behaviour is much improved and that few instances of poor behaviour now occur.

Safety  The school’s work to keep students safe and secure is good. Procedures to ensure students are safe in school, for example in practical lessons, are impacting positively on how learners look after themselves. Students say they feel safe.  Procedures to check the credentials of staff are well kept and systems to record any and all types of bullying are in place. Students know where to get help when they have a problem and say that they know how to stay safe when using online technologies. Younger students develop confidence in speaking with adults and older students in their coaching groups.  Absence rates, including the number of students who are regularly absent, have reduced so that attendance is now above average. There is no difference in the rates of attendance by different groups of students. The attendance of students who attend alternative off-site provision is good.

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Although teaching is improving quickly, it still requires improvement because over time it has not enabled students to make good progress, particularly in mathematics.  Expectations of what students are capable of achieving over time are not always high enough. Students are sometimes not challenged to do well or to work hard.  Teachers are not always clear enough about what students already know and can securely do. As a result, planned work does not always meet their varying needs and abilities. It does not stretch, challenge, excite on inspire students to achieve their best. Notably, the achievement of the most able students is held back.  Although a new policy is in place for assessing students’ attainment and progress and for marking students’ work, not all teachers are yet following this agreed approach. In subjects where it is well embedded, such as in English, students are making better progress. In other subjects, especially mathematics, students do not know what they need to do so improve and do not deepen their understanding of their work.  The teaching of literacy, including reading, has improved and is good across the school. Students’ improved achievement in reading and writing is helping to ensure that they have the basic literacy skills

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 6 of 10

needed to be able to learn successfully in other subjects.  Teaching across the school is improving quickly and the vast majority of staff are rising to the challenge to improve their teaching with determination. Weekly training for teachers is well attended. Teachers are now more focussed on making sure that expectations of students are high, that activities are challenging and that a closer check is made on students’ progress. As a result, achievement is improving. Students acknowledge that teaching is getting better.

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Students join the school in Year 7 with attainment that is similar to the national average. From their individual starting points, students in Key Stages 3 and 4 make expected progress and so, by the time they leave Year 11, the standards they reach in GCSE examinations remain average. Too few students make good progress.  The achievement of the most able requires improvement. The proportion of students reaching the highest grades in examinations is below average, especially in mathematics. The achievement of the most able students is held back because work set does not always challenge, excite or inspire them to do their best and reach their potential.  Unvalidated results of GCSE examinations in 2014 show a fall in standards reached in some subjects and particularly in mathematics. Achievement in mathematics requires improvement. In 2014, the proportion of students making better than expected progress in mathematics fell to just 21%, almost a third lower than the national average.  School data and inspection evidence shows that the rate of students’ progress across the year groups fell last year, with too few making good progress.  New senior leaders, however, have taken decisive action to reverse this decline. Better teaching and the early identification of students who may be falling behind, means that students’ progress is now accelerating, especially in English, where many students are now making good progress.  In the 2013 GCSE results in English, the attainment of disadvantaged students was almost identical to that of non-disadvantaged students in the school and non-disadvantaged students nationally. In mathematics, the attainment of disadvantaged students was lower than non-disadvantaged students in the school by about a third of a grade and a sixth of a grade lower than non-disadvantaged students nationally. In 2012, these gaps were almost four times wider for both subjects; this reflects much improved achievement of disadvantaged students, many of whom are now making good progress.  Disabled students, those with special educational needs and students from minority ethnic backgrounds make similar progress to their peers overall. Although their progress is also speeding up, variances in the quality of teaching means that it still requires improvement.  The very few students who attend off-site alternative provision make good progress.  The school enters a small minority of students early for GCSE examinations in mathematics. Leaders ensured that only those students capable of reaching the highest grades at that time were entered. This has enabled these students more time to study other subjects to improve their grades.

The sixth form provision requires improvement

 Students enter the sixth form with levels of attainment that are broadly average and finish Year 12 or Year 13 overall broadly in line with national average. Too few students make good progress from their previous starting points and, as a result, achievement requires improvement.  Although pass rates overall are close to the national levels, too few of the most able students reach the higher grades. In 2013, at AS-level, 26% of students attained a high grade A* or B compared to 35% nationally, and at A-level 29% attained a higher grade A* or B compared to 51% nationally. Although in 2014, a higher proportion reached the high grades at A-level, it remained below average.  Although teaching is improving and some is good, overall teaching is too inconsistent in quality across the subjects and, as a result, requires improvement. In, particular, work for the most able students lacks challenge.  Changes in sixth form leadership have impacted on the pace of improvement. Improvements, such as in teaching, have taken place, but at a steadier rate than in the rest of the school. New senior leaders quickly identified the actions needed to speed up the pace of improvement and some significant changes have already taken place. A revised curriculum, for example, is now offering students fewer but more structured subjects, which are covered in greater depth and which better reflect teachers’ particular skills and subject

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 7 of 10

knowledge. Where students express a desire to study a course not on offer in the school, different local providers support students well to access it. Sixth form leadership, however, is yet to ensure that teaching is consistently good.  Students say that they are supported well in their decision to join the sixth form. They speak highly of the opportunities afforded to them. They are firm in their belief that since the arrival of new leaders, sixth form provision has improved. They like the ‘family feel’ to the school, enjoy the extra responsibilities given through the new coaching system and behave well. A higher than average proportion of students completes their sixth form courses than do so nationally.

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 8 of 10

What inspection judgements mean

School Grade Judgement Description Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not improvement inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

Inspection report: Wetherby High School, 7–8 October 2014 9 of 10

School details

Unique reference number 108088 Local authority Leeds Inspection number 442201

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 742 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 129 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Cindy Bentley Headteacher Simon Flowers (Executive Headteacher) Lucie Lakin (Acting Headteacher) Date of previous school inspection 23 October 2012 Telephone number 01937 522500 Fax number 01937 522504 Email address [email protected]

Any complaints about the inspection or the report should be made following the procedures set out in the guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email [email protected].

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email [email protected]. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Piccadilly Gate Store St Manchester M1 2WD

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: [email protected] W: www.ofsted.gov.uk © Crown copyright 2014

Land to the east of Wetherby Site Plan ref: HG2-226 SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125

Site Details Easting 441607 Northing 449354 Site area ha 47.59 SP7 Major Settlement Extension HMCA Outer North East Ward Wetherby

Site Characteristics Site type Greenfield

On-site land uses - None

Agriculture

NeighbouringAdjacent land landuses uses- None Agriculture Manufacturing and Wholesale

Other land uses - None

Topography Flat and sloping Landscape Limited Tree Cover Boundaries Existing well defined Road front Yes

Description A large well contained site situated to the north-eastern edge of Wetherby formed of several agricultural fields. The A1(M) lies directly to the west of the site. A vehicle bridge across the A1 into Wetherby is available to the south-west of the site on York Road. Wetherby Young Offenders instistute is present directly to the south of the site with further beyond. Wetherby Motorway Service Station (J46) is location close to the north boundary the site, which is also the administrative boundary with North Yorkshire.

Spatial relationships

UDP Designations Core Strategy

N32 Greenbelt 0.00 % overlap Main Urban Area 0.00 % overlap N34 PAS 0.00 Major Settlement 0.00 RL1 Rural Land 100.00 Minor Settlement 0.00 N1 Greenspace 0.00 Overlaps Urban Extension N1A Allotments 0.00 N5 Open Space 0.00 Regeneration Areas N6 Playing Pitch 0.00 N8 Urban Green Corridor 0.00 Inner South RA 0.00 % overlap CC Shopping Quarter 0.00 LB Corridor RA 0.00 UDP City Centre 0.00 EASEL RA 0.00 S2S6 Town Centre 0.00 Aire Valley RA 0.00 Proposed Local Centre 0.00 West Leeds Gateway 0.00 Sch. Ancient Mon. 0.00

Other Spatial Relationship

LCC ownership % 0.00

Nearest train station Garforth Nearest train station distance (m) 15762.08 Nearest bus stop 4879 Nearest bus stop distance (m) 414.24

Agricultural classification Grade Percent Grade 2 40.61 Grade 3 45.61 Grade 3b 9.59 Grade 3a 4.19 Land to the east of Wetherby Site Plan ref: HG2-226 SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125

Overlaps SSSI Overlaps Public Right of Way Overlaps SEGI Overlaps SFRA Flood Zone Overlaps LNA Overlaps EA Flood Zone Overlaps LNR Overlaps HSE Major Hazard Overlaps Conservation Area Overlaps HSE Gas Pipeline Overlaps Listed Building Overlaps Pot. Contamination Overlaps N37 SLA Overlaps Minerals Safeguarded Overlaps Strat. Employment buffer Overlaps Minerals Safeguarded 100m

Greenbelt assessment not required

Summary of infrastructure provider comments

LCC Highways Comments Public transport accessibility comments Rank (1-5) The site fails all the accessibility criteria but the size of this and the adjacent site give some potential for new Public Transport and local services. Severance issues to Wetherby cannot be resolved though. 1

Access comments Access points possible with Ghost Islands or signals 4

Local network comments A site of this size will have implication in Wetherby town centre and the junction of York Road and Deighton Road. 3

Mitigation measures Total score Works at site frontage 8

Highways site support Yes with mitigation

Contingent on other sites

Highways England Impact Major Impact Network Status Likely to require significant physical mitigation Potential for cumulative impact in combination with other sites. If site still included at next sift assess as part of Wetherby cluster

Network Rail

Yorkshire Water Treatment Works There is very limited capacity at Wetherby for new development. Development that will connect to the public sewer system needs to be coordinated with Yorkshire Water’s Asset Management Plans (AMP) to ensure the necessary infrastructure and capacity can be provided to serve the site. The forthcoming AMP(6) will run from April 2015 to March 2020. Phasing is one method used to ensure sites are brought forward in line with YW’s investment. It is particularly important that sites which represent a 10% or greater increase in population served by the works should take into account available sewerage and WwTW capacity. If a developer wants to bring a site forward before YW have completed any planned improvements it may be possible for the developer to provide contributions. The amount would be determined by a developer funded feasibility study.

Environment Agency Constraints FZ2 & FZ3 runs through middle of site & southern corner. See comments in main text of our response Land to the east of Wetherby Site Plan ref: HG2-226 SHLAA ref: 1233_2158_3125

LCC Ecology support

Education comments See infrastructure background paper

Flood Risk Predominantly Flood Zone 1. Parts of site in Flood Zones 2 and 3 adjacent to Sand Beck. Please Note: any development has potential to increase flood risk elsewhere, particularly development of ‘greenfield’ sites. LCC therefore reserves the right to ask for developer contributions for such sites, to mitigate flood risk, elsewhere in the catchment.

Utilities Gas

Electric

Fire and Rescue

Telecoms

Other Heritage England

Natural England Housing site 1046 is within 750m of SAC/SSSI. Sites 2158, 3125, 1233, 4074, 4075 and 4076 within 2km to this site, which is an internationally important site for Great Crested Newts. If these allocations are retained/promoted, the supporting HRA should assess the likely significant effects upon this species. The SA should examine potential significant effects upon the interest features of the SSSI (see citation below) www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation_phtot/200441.pdf

Conclusions

Publication Draft Plan Allocation Housing allocation

Publication Draft Plan Allocation Conclusion The site currently forms a collection of agriculture fields to the eastern edge of Wetherby. The site is not within the UDP Green Belt, however it is open countryside which is currently safeguarded by rural land policy (RL1) within the UDP. The site would be well contained and the wider area currently contains several urbanising developments such as the adjacent Young Offenders Institute. As such the development of the site would not be unduly detrimental to the character of the area. The site is situated adjacent the Wetherby which is the only major settlement within the HMCA. The site would have reasonable access to the Town Centre and local services. The site is considered to form the best option for extending Wetherby when compared against reasonable alternatives. 6 Site Reference: HG2-226 (1233_2158_3125)

Site Address: Land to the east of Wetherby

Housing allocation

Site Capacity: 1080 units

Site Area: 47.59 hectares

Ward: Wetherby

HMCA: Outer North East Phase: 1 Site Requirements - HG2-226:

A comprehensive design brief for the development needs to be agreed prior to the development of the site. A pedestrian link shall be provided to the south-west of the site, providing links to Wetherby town centre. Key landscape features such as the avenue of trees should be retained.

• Flood Risk: A Site-Specific Flood Risk Assessment is required as the site is within or partly within flood zone 3. Development should be directed away from areas of highest flood risk.

• Education Provision: Primary school provision to the equivalent of 2 forms of entry shall be provided on the site.