DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconnaissance of Iron Resources in Arizona I.C. 8236

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconnaissance of Iron Resources in Arizona I.C. 8236 RECONNAISSANCE OF IRON RESOURCES IN ARIZONA By C. M. Harrer information circular 8236 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES Marling J. Ankeny, Director This publication has been cataloged as follows: Harrer, Clarence M Reconnaissance of iron resources in Arizona. [Washington] U. S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines [1964] 204 p. illus., tables. (U. S. Bureau of Mines. Information circular 8236) I. IronArizona. I. Title. (Series TN23.U71 no. 8236 622.06173 U. S. Dept. of the Int. Library Scanned to disk by Jim Christensen, July 2004 CONTENTS Page Abstract ..................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 Acknowledgments .............................................................. 3 Historical production and use ................................................ 3 Geography .................................................................... 4 Iron resources ............................................................... 7 General ................................................................ 7 Quality ................................................................ 11 Reserves ............................................................... 11 Favorable areas and their potential .................................... 16 General geology ............................................................. 18 Iron minerals, rocks, and slags .............................................19 Magnetite .............................................................. 19 Hematite ............................................................... 19 Martite ................................................................ 19 Limonite-goethite ......................................................19 Jarosite ............................................................... 20 Pyrite .................................................................20 Chamosite ..............................................................20 Taconite ............................................................... 20 Jaspilite .............................................................. 20 Impurities .............................................................21 Metallurgical slags .................................................... 21 Iron occurrences by counties ................................................21 Apache County .......................................................... 21 Lyman Reservoir (Red Cap) hematite ................................21 Quartzite Creek hematite .......................................... 22 Cochise County ........................................................ 22 Dos Cabezas Mountains magnetite .................................. 22 Dragoon Mountains (Black Diamond) magnetite-hematite...............22 Gleeson Ridge (Courtland) magnetite-hematite ......................24 Spike Hills (Iron Door) hematite ..................................24 Coconino County ........................................................25 Deadman-Lonesome Pockets (Sycamore Canyon) hematite............... 25 Long Valley-Iron Mine draw hematite-limonite ......................25 Gila County ............................................................26 Introduction ...................................................... 26 Baker and Carr Mountains magnetite-hematite .......................26 Bear Creek-Rock Creek hematite ....................................26 Big Pig magnetite ................................................. 27 Black Mountain hematite............................................28 Bottle Spring (Hope-Lucky) hematite ...............................28 Christmas Mine cupreous magnetite ................................ 29 Christopher Mountain hematite......................................30 Circle Ranch magnetite-hematite .................................. 31 Coon Creek (Willyerd-Baker) hematite ............................. 31 Delshay Basin magnetite-hematite ..................................32 ii CONTENTS (Con.) Dry Creek (Last Chance-Lucky Strike) hematite .................... 32 Fern magnetite ................................................... 34 Fourth of July magnetite ..........................................34 Gentry Creek (Frog Pond) hematite ................................ 35 Gentry Mesa hematite ..............................................37 Globe district hematite-limonite ..................................38 Great View magnetite ..............................................38 Griffin Wash (Walnut Spring) magnetite ........................... 39 Haigler and Gordon Creeks magnetite-hematite ..................... 40 Horse Camp Creek-Rock House hematite ............................. 41 Howard magnetite ..................................................41 Iron group hematite ...............................................42 Iron King group titaniferous hematite ............................ 42 Kennedy ranch magnetite .......................................... 44 Last Chance (Last Time, Kennedy) magnetite ....................... 45 Limestone Ridge (V. O. Ranch) hematite ........................... 45 Nail Ranch (Iron Spike, Iron Prince) hematite .................... 46 Pig Iron titaniferous hematite ....................................47 Pine Ridge magnetite ..............................................51 Pittsburg-Tonto magnetite-hematite ............................... 52 Alder Creek magnetite-hematite ....................................52 Pueblo-Lucky Strike magnetite .....................................52 Seneca (Cienega) magnetite ........................................54 Shell Mountain (hematite 1 to 8 group) hematite .................. 54 Twin Peaks hematite ...............................................56 White Tail (Horseshoe) magnetite ..................................56 Zimmerman-Asbestos Points magnetite .............................. 56 Graham County ......................................................... 57 Bitter Spring magnetite .......................................... 57 Mt. Turnbull-Stanley Butte District magnetite-hematite ........... 59 Captain Jack magnetite-hematite ............................. 59 Brewer magnetite ............................................ 60 Greenlee County ....................................................... 60 Morenci-Metcalf District magnetite-hematite ...................... 60 East Yankee magnetite ....................................... 60 Copper Mountain magnetite-limonite .......................... 60 Gold Gulch magnetite ........................................ 61 Shannon Mountain magnetite, hematite, limonite...............61 Miscellaneous .....................................................62 Maricopa County ........................................................ 62 Precambrian taconite-like iron formations, Maricopa and Yavapai Counties ................................................ 62 Introduction ................................................ 62 Big Boulder and Iron Ridge hematite-magnetite taconite....... 64 Hieroglyphic Mountains (Pikes Peak) hematite-magnetite taconite-semitaconite ...................................... 67 Big Horn District (Fred Brown) magnetitic alluvium ............... 71 iii CONTENTS (Con.) Page Bilge pump, New Year, Toro hematite, goethite turgite.............. 71 Phoenix Mountains magnetite ....................................... 71 White Tank Mountains (Luck Lode) titaniferous magnetite............ 71 Mohave County .......................................................... 72 Alamo Crossing hematite ........................................... 72 Grand Wash Cliffs hematite ........................................ 72 Hualapai and Yucca magnetitic alluvium ............................ 72 Navajo County, Fort Apache Indian Reservation hematite .................72 Introduction ...................................................... 72 Apache (Alsace Lorraine) hematite .................................74 Chediski hematite ................................................. 77 Cow Creek hematite ................................................ 80 Marley-Grasshopper hematite ....................................... 80 Oak Creek (Grasshopper Ranch) hematite ............................ 80 Split Rock (Gentry-Rock Creek) hematite ........................... 81 Pima County ............................................................ 81 Ajo magnetite-hematite ............................................ 81 Quijotoa Mountains magnetite-hematite.............................. 82 Horseshoe Basin (Ballam) magnetite-hematite ................. 82 Stepp-Laive magnetite-hematite ...............................84 Knight group magnetite-hematite ............................. 85 Iron Dike, Iron Duke, and others, magnetite-hematite......... 85 Iron Hill-Days Camp specularite and Morgan Peak hematite-specularite ....................................... 86 Santa Rita and Sierrita Mountains magnetite ....................... 86 Sierrita Mountains magnetite ......................................86 Mineral Hill and Daisy, cupreous magnetite ........................ 87 Miscellaneous ..................................................... 87 Pinal County ........................................................... 87 Mammoth-Collins mine hematite ..................................... 87 Florence-Oracle Junction-Red Rock magnetitic alluvium.............. 87 Slate Mountains-Lake Shore mine magnetite .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models
    Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER View of the abandoned Chrome Concentrating Company mill, opened in 1917, near the No. 5 chromite mine in Del Puerto Canyon, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photograph by Dan Mosier, 1972). Insets show (upper right) specimen of massive chromite ore from the Pillikin mine, El Dorado County, California, and (lower left) specimen showing disseminated layers of chromite in dunite from the No. 5 mine, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photographs by Dan Mosier, 2012). Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models By Dan L. Mosier, Donald A. Singer, Barry C. Moring, and John P. Galloway Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 This report and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5157/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Mosier, D.L., Singer, D.A., Moring, B.C., and Galloway, J.P., 2012, Podiform chromite deposits—database and grade and tonnage models: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tungsten Indicator Minerals Scheelite and Wolframite with Examples from the Sisson W-Mo Deposit, Canada
    Overview of tungsten indicator minerals scheelite and wolframite with examples from the Sisson W-Mo deposit, Canada M. Beth McClenaghan1, M.A. Parkhill2, A.A. Seaman3, A.G. Pronk3, M. McCurdy1 & D.J. Kontak4 1Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8 (e-mail: [email protected]) 2New Brunswick Department of Energy and Mines, Geological Surveys Branch, P.O. Box 50, Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada E2A 3Z1 3New Brunswick Department of Energy and Mines, Geological Surveys Branch, P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5H1 4Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6 These short course notes provide an overview of published lit- Table 1. List of regional surveys and case studies conducted around erature on the use of scheelite and wolframite as indicator min- the world in which scheelite and/or wolframite in surficial sediments erals for W, Mo, and Au exploration. The use of scheelite and have been used as indicator minerals. wolframite in stream sediments is well documented for mineral Mineral Media Location Source of Information exploration but less so for using glacial sediments (Table 1). scheelite stream sediments Pakistan Asrarullah (1982) wolframite stream sediments Burma ESCAP Scretariat (1982) The Geological Survey of Canada has recently conducted a scheelite, wolframite stream sediments USA Theobald & Thompson (1960) glacial till and stream sediment indicator mineral case study scheelite stream sediments, soil Thailand Silakul (1986) around the Sisson W-Mo deposit in eastern Canada. scheelite stream sediments Greenland Hallenstein et al. (1981) Preliminary indicator mineral results from this ongoing study scheelite stream sediments Spain Fernández-Turiel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita - Stephen J
    Curriculum Vita - Stephen J. Reynolds School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1404 (480) 965-9049 (work) Website: http://reynolds.asu.edu email: [email protected] Degrees/Registration University of Texas, El Paso: B.S., Geology, 1974 University of Arizona: M.S., Geosciences, 1977, Ph.D., Geosciences,1982 Arizona Registered Geologist #26773 (1993-present) Recent Professional Experience Arizona State University, Dept. of Geology: Professor (6/97 to present), Associate Professor (8/91 to 6/97). Teaching responsibilities include Advanced Geologic Field Mapping, Advanced Structural Geology, Applied Arizona Geology, Cordilleran Regional Geology, Geology of Arizona, Geotectonics, Introductory Geology, Orogenic Systems, Summer Field Geology, Methods of Geoscience Teaching ASU Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Associate Director (6/99 to present); chairman of founding committee. Arizona Geological Survey and Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology: Research Geologist (6/88 to 7/91), Associate Research Geologist (6/87 to 6/88); Assistant Research Geologist (2/81 to 6/87). University of Arizona, Dept. of Geosciences: Visiting Associate Professor, (1991 to ~1997); Adjunct Associate Research Scientist (1987 to 1991); Research Associate and Assistant (1/75 to 12/80); Teaching Assistant (8/74 to 7/75) Geologist and Consulting Geologist: Clients include Animas Resources (2007 to present), Pediment Exploration, Ltd. (2007 to present), Clear Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Phoenix Mountains, Central Arizona
    Geologic Map of the Phoenix Mountains, Central Arizona Julia K. Johnson, Stephen J. Reynolds, and David A. Jones Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Map 04-A Tucson, AZ 2003 Introduction The Phoenix Mountains, located within the Phoenix metropolitan area of central Arizona, are a northwest-trending, uplifted fault block that extends for about 13 km (8 miles) from Moon Hill in the northwest to Camelback Mountain in the southeast (Fig. 1). The area includes a main range, with 420 m (1,378 ft) of local relief, as well as several isolated peaks. The geologic mapping for this study covers the main part of the range, including (from northwest to southeast) Moon Hill, Shaw Butte, North Mountain, Stoney Mountain, Dreamy Draw, Squaw Peak, and the informally named Quartzite Ridge. The main goals of this study were to document the bedrock geology, reconstruct the geologic history, and produce a 1:24,000 geologic map of the range. The area contains a remarkable stratigraphic sequence that records the formation of continental crust in the region as it evolved from an oceanic setting to a more continental setting. The rocks have been cleaved and steeply tilted, providing a well-exposed traverse through this exceptional sequence. The range also contains spectacular Proterozoic (Precambrian) structures, which document the extreme deformation that affected the crust soon after it had formed. Lookout Moon Mtn. Hill Shadow Thunderbird Mtn. Hills Shaw Stoney North Butte Mtn. Mtn. Squaw Quartzite aw Peak Ridge Dr my Mummy ea Dr Mtn. Camelback Mtn. Figure 1. Three-dimensional perspective of the Phoenix Mountains, looking north.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Preserve Master Plan
    City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve Master Plan City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve Sonoran Preserve Master Plan An Open Space Plan for the Phoenix Sonoran Desert HCDE Sonoran Preserve Master Plan An Open Space Plan for the Phoenix Sonoran Desert City of Phoenix Parks, Recreation and Library Department February 17, 1998 Herberger Center for Design Excellence Arizona State University The City of Phoenix prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, religion, age, sexual ori- entation, or disability in its services, programs and activi- ties. Anyone who believes he or she has been discriminated against may file a complaint with the City of Phoenix Equal Opportunity Department. The City of Phoenix does not carry accident insurance to cover participants. Involvement in any activity is done at the participant’s own risk. This pubication can be provided in an alternative format upon request. Call 602-262-6862 (voice). TDD 602-262- 6713 (parks and recreation) or 602-534-5500 (city opera- tor). FAX 602-534-3787. E-mail [email protected] Figure Credits Ward Brady: cover map, chapter 2 divider, 2.14 Jim Burke: chapter 3 divider, 3.19, 5.4 City of Phoenix Information Technology: 2.13 City of Phoenix Parks, Recreation, and Library Department: cover owl, 1.1, 1.2, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.11, 1.12, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.12, 2.15, 2.17, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.18, 3.23, 4.1, 4.2, chapter 5 divider, 5.5, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11 City of Phoenix Planning Department: 2.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 Joe Ewan: cover children,
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Mineral Products in Our Bedroom Bed Hematite
    Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Make-Up Kit Muscovite Bed Talc Hematite: hinges, handles, Mica mattress springs Hematite: for color Chromite: chrome plating Bismuth Radio Barite Copper: wiring Plastic Pail Quartz: clock Mica Gold: connections Cassiterite: solder Toilet Bowl / Tub Closet Feldspar: porcelain Chromite: chrome plating Pyrolusite: coloring Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Chromite: plumbing fixtures Quartz : mirror on door Copper: tubing Desk Toothpaste Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Apatite: teeth Chromite: chrome plating Fluorite: toothpaste Mirror Rutile: to color false Hematite: handle, frame teeth yellow Chromite: plating Gold: fillings Gold: plating Cinnabar: fillings Quartz: mirror Towels Table Lamp Sphalerite: dyes Brass (an alloy of copper and Chromite: dyes zinc): base Quartz: bulb Water Pipe/Faucet/Shower bulb Wolframite: lamp filament Brass Copper: wiring Iron Nickel Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Chrome: stainless steel Bathroom Cleaner Department of Environment and Natural Resources Borax: abrasive, cleaner, and antiseptic MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU Deodorant Spray Can Cassiterite Chromite Copper Carpet Quartz Sphalerite: dyes Telephone Chromite: dyes Drinking Glasses Copper: wiring Sulfur: foam padding Quartz Chromite: plating Gold: red color Clock Silver: electronics Pentlandite: spring Graphite: batteries Refrigerator Quartz: glass, time keeper Hematite Television Chromite: stainless steel Chromite: plating Computer Galena Wolframite: monitor Wolframite: monitor Copper Copper:
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Styles of Lead-Zinc-Barium Mineralization in the Lower Benue Trough, Southeastern Nigeria
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Earth Sci. Res. J. Vol. 21, No. 1 (March, 2017): 7 - 16 ORE DEPOSITS Contrasting styles of lead-zinc-barium mineralization in the Lower Benue Trough, Southeastern Nigeria Ifeanyi Andrew Oha*,1, Kalu Mosto Onuoha1, Silas Sunday Dada2 1Department of Geology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. 2Kwara State University Malete *[email protected] ABSTRACT Keywords: Lead-Zinc-Barium mineralization, In the Lower Benue Trough of Southeastern Nigeria, lead-zinc-barium mineralization occurs as widely distributed Benue Trough, epigenetic, vein deposits. epigenetic fracture-controlled vein deposits which are restricted to Albian – Turonian sediments. Detailed field studies carried out in Ishiagu, Enyigba-Ameki-Ameri, Wanikande-Wanakom, and Gabu-Oshina which together constitute the four main areas of mineralization in the Lower Benue Trough, show that mineralization appears restricted to NW-SE and N-S fractures while the more common NE-SW fractures are barren. Apart from the Enyigba area, igneous bodies are found in the vicinity of the ore deposits while in the Wanikande area, barite veins and veinlets were observed to be closely interwoven with intrusive bodies. The host lithologies are highly varied, ranging from shales to siltstones, sandstones and occasionally igneous bodies. The ore assemblage also varies remarkably, with lead:zinc:barium ratios ranging from approximately 3:1:0 at Ishiagu, to 2:1:0 at Enyigba, 1:0:2 at Wanikande and nearly 100% barite at Gabu-Oshina. Thus, there is a remarkable increase in barite content from the southwest (Ishiagu) to the northeast (Gabu). The characteristics of the ore deposits roughly fit the base metal type mineralization known as clastic dominated lead-zinc-barium deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Geology Reviews 112 (2019) 103037
    Ore Geology Reviews 112 (2019) 103037 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Framboidal chalcopyrite and bornite constrain redox conditions during formation of their host rocks in the copper stratabound mineralization of T Picachos, north-central Chile ⁎ R. Merineroa, , L. Ortegaa, R. Lunara, R. Piñaa, V. Cárdenesb a Mineralogy and Petrology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain b Geology Department, Oviedo University, C/Jesús Arias de Velasco s/n, 33005 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Picachos Project is a copper deposit that occurs in manto-type orebodies in north-central Chile and it ex- Framboidal pyrite hibits common features of Chilean stratabound or manto-type copper deposits: (1) an increase of copper contents Framboidal chalcopyrite from the margins to the centre of the orebodies; (2) sodic and potassic hydrothermal alteration of host rocks with Framboidal bornite subsequent chloritization and sericite alteration; and (3) its occurrence in sequences of limestones that are Representative size distributions intercalated with volcanic rocks. The most salient characteristic of the Picachos Project is the presence of per- vasive framboidal pyrite in both the non-mineralized limestones and the host rocks of the copper mineralization. These framboidal pyrites are well preserved, probably due to their close relationship with organic matter, and have no evident textures of overgrowth, recrystallization or dissolution. Moreover, framboidal chalcopyrite and bornite are formed in the external and internal areas, respectively, of the orebodies, sharing common mor- phological characteristics with framboidal pyrite, and are formed by the replacement of the original pyrite framboids, without changing their shape and size distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Saddlebrooke Hiking Club Hike Database 11-15-2020 Hike Location Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Description
    SaddleBrooke Hiking Club Hike Database 11-15-2020 Hike Location Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Description AZ Trail B Arizona Trail: Alamo Canyon This passage begins at a point west of the White Canyon Wilderness on the Tonto (Passage 17) National Forest boundary about 0.6 miles due east of Ajax Peak. From here the trail heads west and north for about 1.5 miles, eventually dropping into a two- track road and drainage. Follow the drainage north for about 100 feet until it turns left (west) via the rocky drainage and follow this rocky two-track for approximately 150 feet. At this point there is new signage installed leading north (uphill) to a saddle. This is a newly constructed trail which passes through the saddle and leads downhill across a rugged and lush hillside, eventually arriving at FR4. After crossing FR4, the trail continues west and turns north as you work your way toward Picketpost Mountain. The trail will continue north and eventually wraps around to the west side of Picketpost and somewhat paralleling Alamo Canyon drainage until reaching the Picketpost Trailhead. Hike 13.6 miles; trailhead elevations 3471 feet south and 2399 feet north; net elevation change 1371 feet; accumulated gains 1214 northward and 2707 feet southward; RTD __ miles (dirt). AZ Trail A Arizona Trail: Babbitt Ranch This passage begins just east of the Cedar Ranch area where FR 417 and FR (Passage 35) 9008A intersect. From here the route follows a pipeline road north to the Tub Ranch Camp. The route continues towards the corrals (east of the buildings).
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan
    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
    [Show full text]