DOCSLIB.ORG

Society of Systematic Biologists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Society of Systematic Biologists Has the Biological Species Concept Outlived Its Usefulness? Author(s): Paul R. Ehrlich Source: Systematic Zoology, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Dec., 1961), pp. 167-176 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. for the Society of Systematic Biologists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2411614 Accessed: 04-01-2016 19:22 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd., Society of Systematic Biologists and Oxford University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Systematic Zoology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 132.248.28.28 on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:22:34 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SYMPOSIUM ON PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMATICS 167 more than abstract logical forms and catego- REFERENCES ries. They are habits, predispositions,deeply BRIDGMAN,P. W. 1936. The nature of physi- engrained attitudes of aversion and prefer- cal theory. Dover Publications, New York. ence. Moreover, the conviction persists- CLAUSEN, J. 1960. A simple method for the though history shows it to be a hallucination sampling of natural populations. Scottish -that all the questions that the human mind Plant Breeding Sta. Report: 69-73. has asked are questions that can be answered DARWIN, C. 1859. The origin of species. in terms of the alternatives that the questions DEWEY, C. 1957. The influenceof Darwinism themselves present. But in fact intellectual on philosophy. In M. GARDNER(ed.), Great progress usually occurs through sheer aban- essays in science. Pocket Library, Henry donment of questions together with both of Holt, New York. the alternatives they assume-an abandon- HARRINGTON,W. 1954. Flora of Colorado. ment that results from their decreasing vi- PERRY, J. W. 1960. Theory of documentation tality and a change of urgent interest. We do and strategy of searching. Apr. 12 and 13, 1960, Cleveland, Ohio. Contract No. AF 49 not solve them: we get over them. Old ques- (638)-357. (mimeographed). tions are solved by disappearing, evaporating, while new questions corresponding to the NORMAN H. RUSSELL, JR. is Professor of changed attitude of endeavor and preference Botany at Arizona State University, Tempe, take their place . ." (Dewey, reprint 1957) Arizona. Has the BiologicalSpecies Concept OutlivedIts Usefulness? PAUL R. EHRLICH IN THE PRESENT PAPER I would the "modern synthesis" in evolution liketo considerthe following question: would deny that reproductiveisolation is Is the biologicalspecies concept a use- a major factorin the evolutionaryprocess. ful taxonomictool? I do not wish to re- It does, however, seem pertinentto ques- examine the philosophicalquestion of tion (even at the risk of being accused whetheror not therereally are distinct of embracing the heresies of typologyand entitiesin nature which correspondto anti-evolutionism) using this isolation as our idea of "biological species." This a criterion for a taxonomic grouping. problemhas been dealt with fully by Grant (1957:74-75) states Burma (1954), Mayr (1957a), and others. "Accordingto the biologicalspecies concept In additionI will ignorethe relatedques- the species is a populationset apart fromthe tion of the degree to which apparent rest of the livingworld by reproductiveiso- structuringin natureis an artifactcaused lating mechanisms.Its boundariestherefore shouldbe markedby a prominentgap in the by the structuringof the vertebratecen- variationpattern. Good discretespecies are tral nervous systemor by the thought in factfound in all majorplant groups. These patternscharacteristic of Western culture. well-definedspecies, however, constitute only Whateverits degreeof reality,there is a fractionof the populationsin theirrespec- no doubt that in the past the biological tivephylads. The botanistfinds problematical species intermixedin varying proportions species concepthas been usefulin help- withgood species in mostof the familiesand ing to shape our thinkingabout evolu- genera. This is in markedcontrast with the tionaryproblems. No one familiarwith situationwhich the zoologistfinds in higher This content downloaded from 132.248.28.28 on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:22:34 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 168 SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY animals in which clearly circumscribedspe- words,forms having a wide spatial dis- cies are a rule and poorlydefined ones the ex- tribution,hut superficiallynot showing ception." greatgeographic variation, were not con- In a sample survey of some genera of sideredas presentingany problemat the plants, Grant found the percentage of species level-althoughinterfertility may "good" (i.e., distinct or easily delimited) not always existwhere it is assumed. species to range from 0 (California The genera of NorthAmerican butter- Ceanothus) to 100 (North American fliesare groupedbelow (somewhatarbi- Asclepias). trarily)into seven categories,according There seems to be general agreement to the frequencyof "good" species found that the biological species concept has withinthem. It was ratherdifficult, in no meaning whatever when one is deal- manycases, to decideexactly which cate- ing with asexual organisms, and is quite gorywas properfor a givengenus, which limited in its applicability in planfts. in itselfwould cast doubt on the overall However, what of the higher animals utilityof the speciesconcept. If biological where "circumscribedspecies are the rule species were readily recognizable,we and poorly defined ones are the excep- would have no difficultyin classifying tion?" Mayr (1957b) has suggested that generaaccording to the proportionof dis- analyses such as were done by Grant tinctspecies found within them. should be carried out for as many groups Group 1. Generain which the species of plants and animals as possible. As a seem quite distinct,and are considered preliminarystep in considering the use- by most workersto presentno serious fulness of the concept, I have done suc'h problems: Parnassius, Neophasia, Phoe- a survey of a group with which I am bis, Lethe, Euptoieta, Poladryas, Micro- familiar, the Nearctic butterflies (Papil- tia, Nymphalis, Vanessa, Anartia, Caly- ionoidea) . copis, Erora, Brephidium, Apodemia. , There are few, if any, groups of equiva- Group2. Generain whichmost species lent size that are as well-known systema- seemdistinct, but the status of some forms tically as the butterflies.Vast collections is in doubtat the presenttime: Eurema, of them have been amassed, and the litera- Anthocaris, Euchloe, Euptychia, Erebia, ture is replete with observations on their Ministrymon,Euristrymon, Strymon, Phi- distribution and (to a lesser degree) lotes. their genetics and behavior. If the bio- Group 3. Genera in which many or logical species concept is useable, it most forms present serious problems: should be easily applicable to a well- Papilio, Pieris, Oeneis, Speyeria, Boloria, known, diploid and outcrossing group of Euphydryas, Chlosyne, Phyciodes, Poly- "higher" animals such as the Nearctic gonia, Precis, Limenitis, Anaea, Libythea, butterflies. Chlorostrymon,Satyrium, "Thecla," Cal- In my survey of the butterflies,several lophrys,Lyeaena, Plebejus, Everes. things were done which would tend to Group4. Generain which,at the pres- overemphasize the utility of the biol6gi- ent stateof our knowledge,the biological cal species concept. First of all I was species conceptis virtuallyinapplicable: surveyinga limitedfauna, and it is widely Colias, Coenonympha, Cercyonis. admitted that species are more clearcut Group 5. Generawhich are monobasic: when viewed within a limited geographi- Paramecera, Neominois, Agraulis, DJryas, cal area. Thus the problem of the specific Dryadula, Habrodais, Hypaurotis, Phaeo- distinctness (or lack of same) of the strymon,Chrysophanus, Dolymorpha, Hy- Nearctic representatives of Holarctic postrymon, Panthiades, Glaucopsyche, formswas not considered. In addition the Phaedrotes, Cetastrina. question of possible undetected repro- Group 6. Genera which are not well ductive barriers was ignored. In other representedin the Nearcticregion, but This content downloaded from 132.248.28.28 on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:22:34 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SYMPOSIUM ON PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMATICS 169 best informationwould indicate that they tween the Palaearctic and Nearctic forms belong in Group 1 or Group 2: Nathalis, recentlylumped as vau-album. For many Anteos, Historis, Eumaeus, Leptotes. years the Nearctic form was considered Group 7: Genera which are not well specifically distinct and went under the represented in the Nearctic region, but name j-album. best informationwould indicate that they Erebia is a genus typical of those belong in Group 3 or Group 4: Battus, in which most species seem distifict Graphium, Parides, Enantia, Lycorella, (Group 2). Ignoring the status problem Heliconius, Metamorpha, Hypolimnas, of our members of Holarctic series, and Myscelia, Diaethria, Eunica, Mestra, the possible reproductive incompatibility Hamadryas, Biblis, Dynamine, Marpesia, of individuals from various populations Apatura, Tmolus, Cyanophrys, Atlides, of widely and
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
  • Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of Research on The

    Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of Research on The

    Reframing the Grazing Debate: Evaluating Ecological Sustainability and Bioregional Food Production Matthew R. Loeser1 Thomas D. Sisk1 Timothy E. Crews2 Kurt Olsen1 Craig Moran1 and Christina Hudenko1 1Center for Environmental Sciences and Education Northern Arizona University PO Box 5694 Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5694 2Environmental Studies Program Prescott College 220 Grove Avenue Prescott, AZ 86301 Abstract. The semi-arid grasslands of the Colorado Plateau are productive, diverse, and extensive ecosystems. The majority of these ecosystems have been altered by human land use, primarily through the grazing of domestic livestock, yielding a plethora of environ- mental and social consequences that are tightly interconnected. From an agroecological perspective, untangling these issues requires both an understanding of the role of livestock grazing in bioregional food production and the effect of that grazing on ecological sustainability. To address the former, we discuss the importance of cattle ranching as a bioregional food source, including estimates of meat production and water use in Arizona. To address the latter, we present data from a long-term project addressing changes in native plant community composition, under a range of alternative livestock management strate- gies. Our study site near Flagstaff, AZ includes four different management treatments: (1) conventional low-intensity, long-duration grazing rotations; (2) high-intensity, short-dura- tion rotations; (3) very high-impact, very short-duration grazing (to simulate herd impact); and, (4) livestock exclosure. Preliminary results suggest belowground properties are re- sponding more quickly to grazing treatments than aboveground properties. Particular Email: Matthew R. Loeser, [email protected] 3 4 REFRAMING THE GRAZING DEBATE response variables, such as cyanobacteria and diatoms, show a marked short-term response to very high-impact, short-duration grazing, but long-term implications are as yet un- known.
  • A Time-Calibrated Phylogeny of the Butterfly Tribe Melitaeini

    A Time-Calibrated Phylogeny of the Butterfly Tribe Melitaeini

    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title A time-calibrated phylogeny of the butterfly tribe Melitaeini. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1h20r22z Journal Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 79(1) ISSN 1055-7903 Authors Long, Elizabeth C Thomson, Robert C Shapiro, Arthur M Publication Date 2014-10-01 DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.010 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 69–81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A time-calibrated phylogeny of the butterfly tribe Melitaeini ⇑ Elizabeth C. Long a, , Robert C. Thomson b, Arthur M. Shapiro a a Center for Population Biology and Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA article info abstract Article history: The butterfly tribe Melitaeini [Nymphalidae] contains numerous species that have been the subjects of a Received 10 March 2014 wide range of biological studies. Despite numerous taxonomic revisions, many of the evolutionary Revised 22 May 2014 relationships within the tribe remain unresolved. Utilizing mitochondrial and nuclear gene regions, we Accepted 11 June 2014 produced a time-calibrated phylogenetic hypothesis for 222 exemplars comprising at least 178 different Available online 18 June 2014 species and 21 of the 22 described genera, making this the most complete phylogeny of the tribe to date. Our results suggest that four well-supported clades corresponding to the subtribes Euphydryina, Keywords: Chlosynina, Melitaeina, and Phyciodina exist within the tribe.
  • Notes on the Life Cycle and Natural History of Butterflies of El Salvador Iii C

    Notes on the Life Cycle and Natural History of Butterflies of El Salvador Iii C

    Jou",al of the Le pidopterists' Society 33(2), 1979, 112-123 NOTES ON THE LIFE CYCLE AND NATURAL HISTORY OF BUTTERFLIES OF EL SALVADOR III C. HISTORIS ODIUS AND COEA ACHERONTA (NYMPHALIDAE-COLOBURINAE) ALBERT MUYSHONDT, JR. AND ALBERTO MUYSHONDT 101 Avenida Norte #322, San Salvador, El Salvador ABSTRACT. A complete photo-illustrated report on the early stages of Historis odius (Fabricius) and a partial of Coea acheronta (Fabricius) are presented, which reveals similarities between the two species suggesting a very close relationship. Both species utilize the same foodplant in El Salvador, Cecropia mexicana (Moraceae), whose close relative, C. peltata, has been reported as foodplant in Brazil by some authors under the vernacular name "Embauba." The placement of these two species in the Coloburini is questioned and some striking larval similarities with Smyrna blomfildia and S. karwinskii (both also questionably placed in the Coloburini) and with Pycina zelis (placed among the Vanesiini) are pOinted out. Larvae of Historis odius are subject to heavy parasitization mostly by tachinid flies and one case of nematode parasitization, (Mermis sp.), is recorded. Historis odius is by far more abundant in El Salvador than Coea acheronta and covers a wider range of altitudes. This article presents information on the life cycles and natural histories of the two largest species of butterflies included in the Coloburini: Historis odius (Fabricius) and Coea acheronta (Fabricius).1 The first time we saw the eggs of Historis odius was 6 October 1970 when our good friend Viktor Hellebuyck captured and papered a female. Some 15 eggs were deposited by the female while still alive inside the envelope.
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
  • Arizona Wildlife Notebook

    Arizona Wildlife Notebook

    ARIZONA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ARIZONA WILDLIFE NOTEBOOK GARRY ROGERS Praise for Arizona Wildlife Notebook “Arizona Wildlife Notebook” by Garry Rogers is a comprehensive checklist of wildlife species existing in the State of Arizona. This notebook provides a brief description for each of eleven (11) groups of wildlife, conservation status of all extant species within that group in Arizona, alphabetical listing of species by common name, scientific names, and room for notes. “The Notebook is a statewide checklist, intended for use by wildlife watchers all over the state. As various individuals keep track of their personal observations of wildlife in their specific locality, the result will be a more selective checklist specific to that locale. Such information would be vitally useful to the State Wildlife Conservation Department, as well as to other local agencies and private wildlife watching groups. “This is a very well-documented snapshot of the status of wildlife species – from bugs to bats – in the State of Arizona. Much of it should be relevant to neighboring states, as well, with a bit of fine-tuning to accommodate additions and deletions to the list. “As a retired Wildlife Biologist, I have to say Rogers’ book is perhaps the simplest to understand, yet most comprehensive in terms of factual information, that I have ever had occasion to peruse. This book should become the default checklist for Arizona’s various state, federal and local conservation agencies, and the basis for developing accurate local inventories by private enthusiasts as well as public agencies. "Arizona Wildlife Notebook" provides a superb starting point for neighboring states who may wish to emulate Garry Rogers’ excellent handiwork.
  • Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) # 25 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 ERNEST J. OSLAR, 1858-1944: HIS TRAVEL AND COLLECTION ITINERARY, AND HIS BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. Ernest John Oslar collected more than 50,000 butterflies and moths and other insects and sold them to many taxonomists and museums throughout the world. This paper attempts to determine his travels in America to collect those specimens, by using data from labeled specimens (most in his remaining collection but some from published papers) plus information from correspondence etc. and a few small field diaries preserved by his descendants. The butterfly specimens and their localities/dates in his collection in the C. P. Gillette Museum (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado) are detailed. This information will help determine the possible collection locations of Oslar specimens that lack accurate collection data. Many more biographical details of Oslar are revealed, and the 26 insects named for Oslar are detailed. Introduction The last collection of Ernest J. Oslar, ~2159 papered butterfly specimens and several moths, was found in the C. P. Gillette Museum, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado by Paul A. Opler, providing the opportunity to study his travels and collections. Scott & Fisher (2014) documented specimens sent by Ernest J. Oslar of about 100 Argynnis (Speyeria) nokomis nokomis Edwards labeled from the San Juan Mts. and Hall Valley of Colorado, which were collected by Wilmatte Cockerell at Beulah New Mexico, and documented Oslar’s specimens of Oeneis alberta oslari Skinner labeled from Deer Creek Canyon, [Jefferson County] Colorado, September 25, 1909, which were collected in South Park, Park Co.
  • Papilio Series) 2006

    Papilio Series) 2006

    (NEW April 28 PAPILIO SERIES) 2006 TAXONOMIC STUDIES AND NEW TAXA OF NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott (also editor), Michael S. Fisher, Norbert G. Kondla, Steve Kohler, Crispin S. Guppy, Stephen M. Spomer, and B. Chris Schmidt Abstract. New diversity is reported and discussed among North American butterflies. Several dozen new taxa are named. A new "sibling" species has been found to occur throughout the Rocky Mts., introducing a new butterfly species to most states in western U.S. and to southern Alberta and BC. Several taxa of Colias, Euphydryas, Lycaena, and Plebejus are raised to species status. Many nam.e changes are made, and many taxa are switched between species to create several dozen new combinations. The relevance of species concepts to difficult groups of butterflies is explored. Introduction This paper consists of miscellaneous taxonomic studies on North American butterflies, some in the northeast, but mostly in the west. Most of the diversity of butterfly fauna in North America is in the western mountainous areas, where the human population is lower, so it has taken longer to study western butterflies, and a lot more study is needed. We have made new findings on many wes.tern butterflies, and this progress is reported below. And Scott recently moved his collection out of old dermestid-infested drawers into fine very-tight ones that those beetles cannot enter, and in the process of resorting them found a dozen unnamed subspecies, which are named below. As we study our butterflies and learn more and more about them, a disturbing pattern has emerged.
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study

    Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study

    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
  • The Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) of Tobago, West

    The Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) of Tobago, West

    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0539 The butterfl ies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) of Tobago, West Indies: An updated and annotated checklist Matthew J.W. Cock CABI, Bakeham Lane Egham, Surrey, TW20 9TY United Kingdom Date of Issue: April 28, 2017 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Matthew J.W. Cock The butterfl ies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) of Tobago, West Indies: An updated and annotated checklist Insecta Mundi 0539: 1–38 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B96122B2-6325-4D7F-A260-961BB086A2C5 Published in 2017 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medical entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Ab- stracts, etc. Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, with completed manuscripts assigned an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are reviewed by the editorial board to ensure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for Systematic Entomology.
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts

    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts

    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri