The Alcohol We Drink and Its Contribution to the Uk's Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Alcohol We Drink and Its Contribution to the Uk's Greenhouse Gas Emissions THE ALCOHOL WE DRINK AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE UK'S GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: A DISCUSSION PAPER WORKING PAPER PRODUCED AS PART OF THE WORK OF THE FOOD CLIMATE RESEARCH NETWORK TARA GARNETT CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY UNIVERSITY OF SURREY February 2007 Tara Garnett, Food Climate Research Network, [email protected] 1 CONTENTS SCOPE AND PURPOSE .......................................................................................... 4 RESEARCH METHOD, GAPS AND QUALIFICATIONS .......................................... 4 STRUCTURE............................................................................................................ 6 TERMINOLOGY, NOTES AND UNITS OF MEASUREMENT................................... 7 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 10 PART ONE: ALCOHOLIC DRINKS IN THE UK ..................................................... 13 1.1. BASIC OVERVIEW .......................................................................................... 13 1.1.a. How much do we drink? ......................................................................... 13 1.1.b. What do we drink and how is this changing? .......................................... 14 1.2. A MORE DETAILED LOOK.............................................................................. 16 1.2.a Beer ....................................................................................................... 16 1.2.b Spirits...................................................................................................... 19 1.2.c. Wine....................................................................................................... 23 PART TWO: ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACTS.. 26 2.1. BEER ............................................................................................................... 26 2.1.a. Overview: beer and its life cycle ............................................................. 26 2.1.b. The agricultural stage............................................................................. 27 2.1.c. Malting.................................................................................................... 36 2.1.d. Brewing .................................................................................................. 39 2.1.e. Bottling and packaging ........................................................................... 43 2.2. SPIRITS ........................................................................................................... 46 2.2.a. Agriculture.............................................................................................. 47 2.2.b. Malting ................................................................................................... 50 2.2.c. Distilling.................................................................................................. 51 2.2.d. Bottle production .................................................................................... 54 2.3. WINE................................................................................................................ 54 2.3.a Viticulture ................................................................................................ 55 2.3.b. Wine making .......................................................................................... 57 2.3.c. Bottle production..................................................................................... 60 2.3.d. Wine: identifying the life cycle hotspots .................................................. 60 2.4. TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS....................................................................... 64 2.4.a. Transport within the UK - freight ............................................................. 64 2.4.b. Transport within the UK: personal transport............................................ 66 2.4.c. Alcohol transport: adding it all up............................................................ 68 2.4.d. Allocating transport emissions by alcohol type ....................................... 70 2.5. CONSUMPTION RELATED ENERGY USE: THE DOMESTIC AND HOSPITALITY SECTORS....................................................................................... 71 2.5.a Refrigeration............................................................................................ 71 2.5.b. Energy use in the hospitality industry ..................................................... 73 Tara Garnett, Food Climate Research Network, [email protected] 2 2.6. ADDING IT ALL UP AND COMPARING THE FIGURES.................................. 75 2.6.a. Alcohol’s contribution to the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions ................ 75 2.6.b. How accurate are these figures likely to be? .......................................... 75 2.6.c. Emissions per unit of alcohol consumed and identifying the hotspots..... 76 2.6.d. Assessing emissions by packaging type and identifying the hotspots..... 77 PART THREE ......................................................................................................... 83 3.1. OPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION: TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................................... 83 3.1.a. Agriculture.............................................................................................. 83 3.1.b. Malting, brewing and distilling................................................................. 83 3.1.c. Packaging............................................................................................... 84 3.1.d.Transport................................................................................................. 90 3.1.e. Energy use in pubs and other premises ................................................. 91 3.2. OPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION: BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE........... 92 3.2.a. How much should we drink?................................................................... 93 3.2.b. The Government’s strategy on alcohol ................................................... 94 3.2.c. How much do we actually drink and what are the implications for greenhouse gas emissions?............................................................................. 95 PART FOUR ........................................................................................................... 99 4.1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................ 99 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................... 100 Tara Garnett, Food Climate Research Network, [email protected] 3 SCOPE AND PURPOSE This paper looks at the alcohol we consume here in the UK. It considers whether we can quantify in ‘good enough’ terms the contribution that our alcohol consumption makes to the UK’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The focus is on the main three categories of alcoholic drink; beer, wine and spirits. Each of these are explored in turn to see what we know about their life cycle impacts and whether there are particular life stages where the GHG impacts are particularly intensive. It also considers whether we might be able to generalise as to whether one particular beverage is more GHG intensive, per alcoholic unit consumed, than another. Following this analysis, the options for emissions reduction are briefly considered. First the technological scope for improving efficiency is explored and here the focus is largely on drinks which can be and are produced in the UK. Wine is excluded from consideration since the vast majority is produced overseas. Next the discussion focuses on behaviour change. It looks at how much people drink, how this relates to current health drinking guidelines and how the overall greenhouse gas impacts of alcohol consumption might change were we to consume within the recommended limits. Finally the paper presents some conclusions. It should be stressed that in so far as is possible the focus of the paper is our consumption rather than the UK’s production of alcoholic drinks. This is an important distinction to make since wine, for example, is almost entirely imported while most of the whisky we produce is exported. Soft drinks and water are not included. This is potentially a substantial omission and it is suggested that further study in these areas would be helpful. RESEARCH METHOD, GAPS AND QUALIFICATIONS Most of the information presented here has been obtained from nationally published government information sources, from trade associations representing the alcohol sector, from overseas studies, from those few academic life cycle studies that exist and from a seminar held on the subject in October 2005. 1 Some of the figures presented are taken from publicly available documents while others rely upon personal communications with industry experts. 2 At the outset it should be said that there is very little published academic literature focusing on the environmental (including greenhouse gas) impact of the alcohol sector. Fairly extensive database, journal and internet searches were performed with combinations of the following key words: beer, alcohol, carbon dioxide, wine, brewing, brewery, breweries, wine, viticulture, viniculture, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change, energy, spirits, whisky, vodka, gin, life cycle assessment and so forth. The journals searched included those with an environmental / life cycle analysis orientation as well as those more specifically
Recommended publications
  • What Do You Need to Know to Reduce Your Risk?
    What do you need to know to reduce your risk? Understand what high risk drinking is Understand Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Levels and some key points about BAC Understand what a standard drink size is vs. a typical party drink size Know the signs and symptoms of alcohol poisoning Know the actions to take if someone appears to be suffering from alcohol poisoning High Risk Drinking Participating in drinking games Celebratory drinking (21st birthday, “the big game”, end of semester, graduation, spring break…) Drinking to get drunk Pre-partying/pre-loading Doing shots Chugging Using a funnel, hose, trough or punch bowl Mixing alcohol with any drugs (legal or illegal) Not knowing what you are drinking or how much you are drinking Combining alcohol with energy drinks These are examples, certainly not all the ways you can drink in a high risk fashion. Any drinking that is in high amounts or short periods of time, creating a situation where the body can’t handle the alcohol, is high risk drinking. How the Body Processes Alcohol When a person drinks alcohol, it can enter the bloodstream immediately. The molecular structure of alcohol is small, so the alcohol can be absorbed or transferred into the blood through the walls of the stomach and the small intestine. The stomach actually has a relatively slow absorption rate; it is the small intestine that absorbs most of the alcohol. Once in the bloodstream, alcohol moves through the body and comes into contact with virtually every organ. However, some of the highest concentrations, and certainly the highest impact, is caused by the alcohol when it reaches the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Open Pull Tab
    Easy Open Pull Tab Submitted to the Italian Packaging Technology Competition March 15, 2006 Brian Calcagno Teresa Haynes Hatfield Josh Taylor California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo PROBLEM There are many people in the world who bite their fingernails. Health risks and public annoyance aside, this causes a disability in opening food packages with metal pull-tabs, such as soft drink cans. Since about 100 billion soft drink cans are produced in the U.S. every year (about one per person per day), it’s obvious that these cans are common in every refrigerator (Kyung- Sun). They should be easy to open, and to many they are. However there is still room for improvement to the design, as nailbiters still find some cans difficult to open. Some soft drink can tabs have been rounded at the end, leaving a tiny space for leverage, but this space is only large enough for a strong fingernail. If the person trying to open the package has no such fingernail, he will have a very difficult time getting to his favorite soft drink. A recent innovation in canned soup packaging has used pull-tabs to make can openers obsolete. The larger, heavier design of these poses an even more significant challenge to nailbiters than soda cans. The geometry of the pull tab on these larger cans causes the tabs to resist upward force even more strongly than familiar soda cans. The shape of the score that the tab is supposed to break also affects the amount of force necessary to open the can.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Units a Brief Guide
    Alcohol Units A brief guide 1 2 Alcohol Units – A brief guide Units of alcohol explained As typical glass sizes have grown and For example, most whisky has an ABV of 40%. popular drinks have increased in A 1 litre (1,000ml) bottle of this whisky therefore strength over the years, the old rule contains 400ml of pure alcohol. This is 40 units (as 10ml of pure alcohol = one unit). So, in of thumb that a glass of wine was 100ml of the whisky, there would be 4 units. about 1 unit has become out of date. And hence, a 25ml single measure of whisky Nowadays, a large glass of wine might would contain 1 unit. well contain 3 units or more – about the The maths is straightforward. To calculate units, same amount as a treble vodka. take the quantity in millilitres, multiply it by the ABV (expressed as a percentage) and divide So how do you know how much is in by 1,000. your drink? In the example of a glass of whisky (above) the A UK unit is 10 millilitres (8 grams) of pure calculation would be: alcohol. It’s actually the amount of alcohol that 25ml x 40% = 1 unit. an average healthy adult body can break down 1,000 in about an hour. So, if you drink 10ml of pure alcohol, 60 minutes later there should be virtually Or, for a 250ml glass of wine with ABV 12%, none left in your bloodstream. You could still be the number of units is: suffering some of the effects the alcohol has had 250ml x 12% = 3 units.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Stress Cracking of Aluminium Alloy Beverage End Scores
    MPMA / BSDA / BBPA RECOMMENDED CODE OF PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS CRACKING OF ALUMINIUM ALLOY BEVERAGE END SCORES Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Technical explanation 3. End manufacturing factors and quality assurance 4. Process / prevention / filling line conditions and equipment specification 5. Test method for assessing the dryness of can Ends 6. Secondary packaging 7. Environment / post manufacture / distribution and storage 8. Training and education 9. Reference documents 10. Figures DATE OF ISSUE: 14 MAY 2001 1. Introduction This Code of Practice has been prepared and agreed jointly by MPMA (Metal Packaging Manufacturers’ Association), BSDA (British Soft Drinks Association) and British Beer and Pub Association. It is based on current best practice and will be subject to annual review. Detailed technical specifications should be agreed between individual suppliers and customers. 2. Technical Explanation Aluminium alloy beer and soft drink can Ends have been long established as successful components, but can undergo an external corrosion failure process at the score due to reaction with moisture, leading to the tabs popping outwards suddenly. The failure is commonly termed stress corrosion cracking and typically occurs in shrink-wraps or cartons held in warehouses. Failure risks through stress corrosion are especially high in hot and humid climates e.g. temperatures above 30°C and humidity above 60%rh (relative humidity). Depending on the variations in these conditions and other related factors contained in this technical brief, failures from within 2 weeks to several months after filling may occur. Figure 1 describes a cross section of an easy-open End and illustrates the area of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Green Living Guide
    GO GREEN ST. TAMMANY A GREEN LIVING GUIDE FOR ST. TAMMANY PRODUCED BY ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES www.stpgov.org/Green-Living DOS AND DON'TS OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE To make sure you are recycling and disposing of Household Hazardous Waste correctly, take a minute to read over these topics. You may discover that you have been doing something wrong all along. DO DO DO Look carefully for a natu- Read the label and follow Keep all chemicals out of ral, non-hazardous substi- use, storage and disposal the reach of children and tute before buying. directions carefully. pets. DON’T DO DON’T Mix chemical products or Completely finish products Re-purpose pesticide or wastes. Dangerous, toxic in containers before dis- other chemical containers. reactions can occur. posal. DO DON’T DO Select water-based prod- Store corrosives, flamma- Choose the pump spray or ucts over solvent-based bles and poisons together. other alternatives rather products when available. than aerosol sprays. FLAMMABLE SOLIDS ARE DANGEROUS! These are solid wastes that pose a fire threat. Flammable solids are materials that have the potential to ignite by friction or heat sources, or by contact with other chemicals. The danger associated with flammable solids is that they have the potential to combust. Flammability is one of the more common dangers of hazardous wastes and must be watched carefully. Exam- ples of flammable solids are charcoal, matches, candles and silicon based caulking products. DID YOU KNOW... USED MOTOR OIL IS A HAZARDOUS WASTE? Used motor oil is a hazardous waste and cannot go into your curbside garbage or trash for pickup.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Coverage Supporting Bottled Water on College Campuses
    College Campus Toolkit Third Party Letters to the Editor Letters to the Editor & Articles Supporting Bottled Water The articles and letters below present arguments and positions in support of bottled water. They were published in newspapers and magazines and were not written by IBWA. These articles and letters provide some good examples of potential talking points and arguments, including the importance of consumer choice and the availability of healthy beverage options. College Campus Ban Related Campus Times: “Questioning the bottle ban” February 21, 2013 http://www.campustimes.org/2013/02/21/questioning-the-bottle-ban/ Roughly 16 universities across the United States and Canada have banned the sale of bottled water on their campuses, according to the “Ban the Bottle” campaign website. Team Green is hoping to add UR to that list. The on-campus discussion has focused mainly on whether bottled or tap water is better, with Team Green conducting taste tests and some student surveys. Unfortunately, that is not the real issue at hand. The real debate is about whether or not banning all bottled water sales is the right decision for this campus. It’s not. Environmentally, it would seem that banning all bottled water would reduce waste, but there are unseen consequences. First, it takes much more energy to make reusable water bottles than it does to make recyclable plastic water bottles. A 1994 article in “Environmental Management” demonstrated that you would need to use a standard, reusable plastic cup over 200 times in order for its energy impact — including dish washing — to be less than that of foam cups.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasting in Homeric Epic 303
    HESPERIA 73 (2004) FEASTING IN Pages 301-337 HOMERIC EPIC ABSTRACT Feasting plays a centralrole in the Homeric epics.The elements of Homeric feasting-values, practices, vocabulary,and equipment-offer interesting comparisonsto the archaeologicalrecord. These comparisonsallow us to de- tect the possible contribution of different chronologicalperiods to what ap- pearsto be a cumulative,composite picture of around700 B.c.Homeric drink- ing practicesare of particularinterest in relation to the history of drinkingin the Aegean. By analyzing social and ideological attitudes to drinking in the epics in light of the archaeologicalrecord, we gain insight into both the pre- history of the epics and the prehistoryof drinkingitself. THE HOMERIC FEAST There is an impressive amount of what may generally be understood as feasting in the Homeric epics.' Feasting appears as arguably the single most frequent activity in the Odysseyand, apart from fighting, also in the Iliad. It is clearly not only an activity of Homeric heroes, but also one that helps demonstrate that they are indeed heroes. Thus, it seems, they are shown doing it at every opportunity,to the extent that much sense of real- ism is sometimes lost-just as a small child will invariablypicture a king wearing a crown, no matter how unsuitable the circumstances. In Iliad 9, for instance, Odysseus participates in two full-scale feasts in quick suc- cession in the course of a single night: first in Agamemnon's shelter (II. 1. thanks to John Bennet, My 9.89-92), and almost immediately afterward in the shelter of Achilles Peter Haarer,and Andrew Sherrattfor Later in the same on their return from their coming to my rescueon variouspoints (9.199-222).
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanization of the Salt Plains: Early Industry and Material Culture of the Kauffman Neighborhood
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations Anthropology, Department of Summer 6-2021 Urbanization of the Salt Plains: Early Industry and Material Culture of the Kauffman Neighborhood June Weber University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthrotheses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Weber, June, "Urbanization of the Salt Plains: Early Industry and Material Culture of the Kauffman Neighborhood" (2021). Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations. 68. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthrotheses/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Urbanization of the Salt Plains: Early Industry and Material Culture of the Kauffman Neighborhood By June Weber A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Anthropology Under Supervision of Professor Effie Athanassopoulos Lincoln, Nebraska June 2021 Urbanization of the Salt Plains: Early Industry and Material Culture of the Kauffman Neighborhood June F. Weber, M.A. University of Nebraska, 2021 Advisor: Effie Athanassopoulos Up until now there has been limited analysis and interpretation of the archaeological collections from excavations conducted on the UNL campus. Similarly, the historic development of this area of Lincoln has not been addressed fully in previous works. Overall, we lack a greater understanding of the historic material culture of the Great Plains region.
    [Show full text]
  • Breweries Beer Bottles El Paso, Texas
    Breweries and Beer Bottles at El Paso, Texas Bill Lockhart 2012 Chapter 5c Liquor Bottles and Brands Used at Juárez During Prohibition I © Bill Lockhart 2012 Chapter 5c Liquor Bottles and Brands Used at Juárez During Prohibition I Even though this is a book about breweries and beer bottles, the Juárez distilleries played a distinct and unique part in the Prohibition dance in the El Paso area. In addition, some of the bars had their own bottles. This sub-chapter will thus cover the whiskey containers that were used at night clubs in Juárez along with some of the ones from the distilleries. The remaining distillery will be discussed in Chapter 5d. Liquor Bottles Liquor bottles used at Juárez fall into two categories: 1) bottles used at specific cafés or bars; and 2) bottles from Juárez distilleries. Only a few bottles from the various clubs seem to have survived, although numerous bottles, trays, ash trays, and other items remain from the two largest distilleries. Bottles from Clubs Some of the clubs (cafés, bars, nightclubs) had individual-size bottles of liquor or wine made for them. These were ca. 1/10 pint by volume and were identified by paper labels. All of these are rare, and there were almost certainly many more than I have listed below. Café Francaise Although not referenced in the report, Lockhart and Olszewski (1995) discovered a flask at the El Paso Coliseum embossed “CAFÉ FRANCAISE (arch) / C. RIVA PETIT / CIUDAD JUAREZ (both horizontal) / MEXICO (inverted arch)” in a round plate (Figure 5c- 1). The flask was topped with a prescription finish reinforced by a thick ring below it (Figure 5c-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation from High Density Polyethylene Waste to a Multifunctional Diamond a Journey of Bringing Plastic Recycling Back to the State of Hawai‘I
    Transformation from High Density Polyethylene Waste to a Multifunctional Diamond A Journey of Bringing Plastic Recycling Back to the State of Hawai‘i Biwen Li May 2012 Submitted towards the fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Architecture Degree School of Architecture University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Doctorate Project Committee: Spencer Leineweber, Chairperson William Chapman Gail Suzuki-Jones Transformation from High Density polyethylene Waste to a Multifunctional Diamond AJourney of Bringing Plastic Recycling Back to the State of Hawai'i Biwen Li M"y 2072 We certi$'that we have read this Doctorate project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and qualig in partial firlfillment for the degree of Doctor ofArchitecture in the school of Architecture, university of Hawai'i at Manoa. Doctorate Project Committee Acknowledgement I would like to express my greatest appreciation to my chair, Spencer Leineweber, who has helped me find the direction of my thesis, given me suggestions, and patiently assisted me in overcoming every obstacle. I could not have achieved this success without her. She inspires me to be a confident and independent thinker, and what I have learned from her will benefit me forever. I would also like to thank my other two committee members, Dr. William Chapman and Gail Suzuki-Jones, LEED AP. Dr. Chapman’s opinions from an interdisciplinary perspective have allowed me to look at my project from a new angle. Mrs. Suzuki-Jones, who is an energy analyst at the State of Hawai‘i, has been extremely supportive and informative in my journey of learning about waste stream and recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • College Campus Toolkit
    College Campus Toolkit Protect Your Right to Purchase Bottled Water The Healthiest Packaged Beverage Choice October 2016 Contents How to Use This Toolkit 3 Important Facts About Bottled Water 4 Planning Meetings With Interest Groups 6 Where to Find the Facts 7 How to Start a Petition 8 Using Social Networks 9 Letter to Editor (LTE) Template 10 Sample LTEs 14 Bottled Water Facts (PDF) 22 2 HOW TO USE THIS TOOLKIT A few colleges have restricted or banned access to bottled water on their campuses. This action, while on the surface might seem well-intended, will have negative health and environmental consequences, and are not in the public interest. New research shows when bottled water is not available in a vending machine, people choose other packaged beverages, which may contain sugar, caffeine, and other additives. They don’t necessarily go looking for a drinking water fountain. The results of a new UVM bottled water sales ban study supports that conclusion. The study: “The Unintended Consequences of Changes in Beverage Options and the Removal of Bottled Water on a University Campus,” published this month in AJPH, concluded that the bottled water sales ban at the University of Vermont (UVM) resulted in a significant increase (33 percent) in the consumption of sugary drinks and an increase (6 percent) in the amount of plastic bottles entering the waste stream. The International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) has developed this helpful toolkit to assist IBWA members, college students and staff, and private citizens in protecting their right to choose bottled water – a convenient, safe, and healthy packaged beverage.
    [Show full text]
  • VOICES Country Report
    VOICES, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL INNOVATION for innovation VOICES is a Europe-wide citizen consultation process, led by Ecsite, the European network of science centres and museums, which helps set the agenda for the environmental research dimension of Horizon 2020 - the European Union’s strategy to advance research and innovation. VOICES represents a valuable insight on methods and procedure for engaging citizen participation to inform Europe’s Responsible Research and Innovation framework. Focus groups, academic analyses of public consultations and dissemination of results COUNTRY REPORT SLOVAKIA will lead to an effective method through which to consult the public on science and technology related issues. VOICES is engaging citizens in all 27 EU countries through science centres and museums - all of which are expert, impartial and powerful partners in public engage- ment with science as members of Ecsite. One thousand European citizens have joined VOICES focus group discussions on innovative uses and solutions for urban waste. The outcomes of this European consul- tation process are presented in the VOICES Reports Collection Views, Opinions and Ideas of Citizens in Europe on Science www.voicesforinnovation.eu for innovation © European Union, 2013 Responsibility for the information and views set out in this publication lies entirely with the authors. Printed on FSC mix paper from responsible sources Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. VOICES THIRD PARTIES ★ ScienceCenter-Netzwerk, Austria ★ Royal Belgian
    [Show full text]