DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft- Please Do Not Circulate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft- Please Do Not Circulate Draft- please do not circulate JUDICIAL DIVERSITY WITHIN MULTICULTURAL STATES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF DISSENTING RULINGS OF ETHNIC-MINORITY JUDGE IN ISRAEL Manal Totry- Jubran Scholarly research on the subject of judicial diversity provides two theoretical answers to the necessity of promoting diversity in the judicial systems of multicultural states. One refers to the importance of “descriptive representation”, the other to that of “substantive representation”. Empirical studies on judicial diversity provide contradictory answers to whether the ethnic identity of minority judges in multicultural societies affects their judicial decisions, and if so, in what way. Despite the fruitful studies on judicial diversity, there is no research on dissenting rulings of ethnic minorities and the effect of ethnic identity on the legal case or on the will and motive to dissent. In this paper, I explore a test case in Israel of the first minority Arab judge appointed to the Supreme Court: The honorable (retired) Justice Salim Joubran. Through an empirical study, I examine his dissenting rulings in constitutional matters and investigate whether he was a descriptive or a substantive representation. The study provides new evidence on the role that ethnic identity plays on judicial behavior in multicultural and conflictual societies. It shows that minority Judges who are part of underprivileged group contextualize the apparently neutral violations of rights and attribute them to marginalized groups. Dissenting rulings of minority judges bring to the legal debate another aspect which contributes to the voicing of underrepresented groups that are distinct aspect from the hegemonic judges. Although dissenting opinions has no legal value in the final verdict, they are critical as they spur legal debate within the judicial system that can affect future verdicts. Accordingly, this research adds insights into the theoretical and empirical study of judicial diversity and shed light on dissenting opinions of minority judges’ role in the court and on shaping the law in multicultural countries. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Bar-Ilan University ([email protected]). I am grateful to the Center for Jewish and Democratic Law for funding this research and to Ori Aronson and Keren Weinshall-Margel for thier valuable and insightful comments. My deep thanks also to Shimon Dayan and Na’ama Levy for their quantitative research assistance. Draft- please do not circulate Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 I. Identity Politics in The Court ............................................................................................... 4 A.Minority Judges in the US Courts ................................................................................ 5 B.Empirical Research on Judicial Diversity in the US .................................................... 6 II. Dissenting Decisions in the Supreme Court ..................................................................... 8 A.Empirical Studies on Dissenting Opinions ................................................................... 9 B.Empirical Studies on Dissenting Opinions in Israel ................................................... 10 III. The Structure of the Israeli Supreme Court ................................................................... 12 A.Judicial Composition of the Israeli Supreme Court ....................................................... 13 B.Salim Joubran: A Short Biography ............................................................................. 14 IV. Methodology .................................................................................................................. 15 V. Diversity in The Israeli Supreme Court: The Case of the First Arab Judge .................. 17 A. Quantitative research ................................................................................................. 17 B.Qualitative Research: Insight from Justice Joubran’s Dissenting Rulings ................. 22 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 28 INTRODUCTION Scholarly research on the subject of judicial diversity provides two theoretical answers to the necessity of promoting diversity in the judicial systems of multicultural states. One refers to the importance of “descriptive representation”, the other to that of “substantive representation”. The idea behind descriptive representation is that striving for courts to resemble the population is, in and of itself, a significant end,1 because the actual presence of women and minorities on the bench, regardless of whether they rule distinctively, provides a stronger sense of legitimacy and authority to minority groups. Later, it was asserted that descriptive representation can, and should add value to substantive representation, enhancing the political, legal, and moral interests of underrepresented groups of minorities.2 Empirical studies that examined whether the ethnic identity of minority judges in multicultural societies do actually affect their judicial decisions provided contradictory answers. However, a large mass of empirical research conducted in the United States in the context of constitutional issues show that women and African American judges vote differently than men and white judges, and that they also write robustly on issues pertaining to civil rights and affirmative 1 Jane Mansbridge, Should Blacks Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”, 67 J. POL. 628, 629 (1999). 2 Jonathan P. Kastellec, Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts, 57 AM. J. POL. SCI. 167, 167-168 (2013). Draft- please do not circulate action.3 Despite the fruitful studies on judicial diversity, there is no research on dissenting rulings of ethnic minorities and the effect of ethnic identity on the legal case or on the will and motive to dissent. In this paper, I explore a test case in Israel of the first minority judge appointed to the Supreme Court: The honorable (retired) Justice Salim Joubran. Through an empirical study, I examine his dissenting rulings in constitutional matters and investigate whether he was a descriptive or a substantive representation. Justice Joubran is part of the country’s largest ethnic minority group, constituting 20% of its population. During his fourteen years on the Supreme Court’s bench (from 2004 until 2017),4 he took part in deciding on numerous petitions and appeals that touched upon the violation of rights of the Palestinian minority in Israel, to which he belongs. These petitions usually challenged the Jewish and democratic character of the state. In some instances, he was part of the majority opinion and gave complementary rulings, or merely agreed with the panels’ majority decisions.5 In other cases, he delivered comprehensive dissenting opinions, whether by writing sole dissenting ones,6 or by joining other dissenting opinions. The examination of Justice Joubran judicial behavior embodies an interesting case-study, because his rulings (especially his dissenting ones) highlight the legal challenges that the Jewish nature and character of the state pose on its democratic and liberal obligation towards its Arab citizens. Thus it provides insight on the effects of minority Justice’s attitudinal behavior (his personal ideology) and of institutional factors on his ruling and by that shed light on his role in shaping the law in conflictual countries. The study provides new evidence on the role that ethnic identity plays on judicial behavior in multicultural and conflictual societies. It shows that minority Judges who are part of underprivileged group contextualize the apparently neutral violations of rights and attribute them to marginalized groups. Dissenting rulings of minority judges bring to the legal debate another aspect which contributes to the voicing of underrepresented groups that are distinct aspect from the hegemonic judges. Although dissenting opinions has no legal value in the final verdict, they are critical as they spur legal debate within the judicial system that can affect future verdicts. Accordingly, this research adds insights into the theoretical and empirical study of judicial diversity and shed light on dissenting opinions of minority judges’ role in the court and on shaping the law in multicultural countries. The research joins the exiting empirical study on what and how diversity contributes to the judicial system and to the normative study on the importance of diversity within the judicial system in multicultural states. It points out to the complexity of minority judges’ rulings that can at times be descriptive representation and at 3 Maya Sen, Diversity, Qualifications, and Ideology: How Female and Minority Judges Have Changed or not Changed Overtime, 2017 WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW 367, 369 (2017). 4 Salim Joubran was first appointed in 2003 as acting Supreme Court Justice. 5 See table 2 in part III. 6 H.C.J. 3166/14 Gutman v. The Attorney General (Nevo, March 12, 2015); H.C.J. 6706/14 Haneen Zoabi v. The Knesset’s Ethics Committee (Nevo, February 10, 2015), C.A.P. 7669/15 Raed Salah Mahajna v. The State of Israel; H.C.J. 2684/12 12th of Cheshvan The Movement for the Strengthening of Tolerance in Religious Education v. The Attorney General (Nevo, December 9, 2015); H.C.J. 1213/10 Nir v. The Speaker of the Knesset (AR”S, February 23, 2012). Draft-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel Resource Cards (Digital Use)
    WESTERN WALL ַה ּכֹו ֶתל ַה ַּמ ַעָר ִבי The Western Wall, known as the Kotel, is revered as the holiest site for the Jewish people. A part of the outer retaining wall of the Second Temple that was destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE, it is the place closest to the ancient Holy of Holies, where only the Kohanim— —Jewish priests were allowed access. When Israel gained independence in 1948, Jordan controlled the Western Wall and all of the Old City of Jerusalem; the city was reunified in the 1967 Six-Day War. The Western Wall is considered an Orthodox synagogue by Israeli authorities, with separate prayer spaces for men and women. A mixed egalitarian prayer area operates along a nearby section of the Temple’s retaining wall, raising to the forefront contemporary ideas of religious expression—a prime example of how Israel navigates between past and present. SITES AND INSIGHTS theicenter.org SHUK ׁשוּק Every Israeli city has an open-air market, or shuk, where vendors sell everything from fresh fruits and vegetables to clothing, appliances, and souvenirs. There’s no other place that feels more authentically Israeli than a shuk on Friday afternoon, as seemingly everyone shops for Shabbat. Drawn by the freshness and variety of produce, Israelis and tourists alike flock to the shuk, turning it into a microcosm of the country. Shuks in smaller cities and towns operate just one day per week, while larger markets often play a key role in the city’s cultural life. At night, after the vendors go home, Machaneh Yehuda— —Jerusalem’s shuk, turns into the city’s nightlife hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Adalah's 2006 Annual Report of Activities
    ADALAH’S 2006 ANNUAL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES Issued May 2007 Introduction This report highlights Adalah’s key activities in 2006, our tenth-year anniversary. As this report reflects, in 2006 Adalah undertook a wide range of legal representations and conducted numerous other advocacy and educational initiatives of crucial importance in promoting and defending the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel. Adalah (“Justice” in Arabic) is an independent human rights organization, registered in Israel. It is a non-profit, non-governmental, and non-partisan legal center. Established in November 1996, it serves Arab citizens of Israel, numbering over one million people or close to 20% of the population. Adalah works to protect human rights in general and the rights of the Arab minority in particular. Adalah’s main goals are to achieve equal individual and collective rights for the Arab minority in Israel in different fields including land rights; civil and political rights; cultural, social, and economic and rights; religious rights; women’s rights; and prisoners’ rights. Adalah is the leading Arab-run NGO that utilizes “legal measures,” such as litigating cases before the Israeli courts and appealing to governmental authorities based on legal standards and analysis to secure rights for Palestinian citizens of Israel. Adalah intensively addresses issues of discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel as a group, as a national minority, and speaks from a minority perspective in its legal interventions. In order to achieve these goals, Adalah: brings cases before Israeli courts and various state authorities; advocates for legislation; provides legal consultation to individuals, non-governmental organizations, and Arab institutions; appeals to international institutions and forums; organizes study days, seminars, and workshops, and publishes reports on legal issues concerning the rights of the Arab minority in particular, and human rights in general; and trains stagaires (legal apprentices), law students, and new lawyers in the field of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • David Abrams, Attorney at Law August 21, 2019 To
    David Abrams, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3353 Church Street Station, New York NY 10008 Tel. 212-897-5821 Fax 212-897-5811 August 21, 2019 To: Internal Revenue Service (by FedEx) Whistleblower Office - ICE 1973 N. Rulon White Blvd. M/S 4110 Ogden, UT 84404 Re: Whistleblower Complaint Against New Israel Fund Dear Sir / Madam: I am the whistleblower in connection with the above-referenced Complaint. Enclosed please find a completed IRS Form 211.. Further, I am respectfully submitting this memorandum to elaborate on the factual and legal aspects of the enclosed IRS whistleblower complaint. In addition, I am enclosing a CD which contains the full, unannotated versions of the documents attached as Exhibits hereto. 1. Who is New Israel Fund? New Israel Fund (“NIF”) is a District of Columbia non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation with its principal place of business in the State of New York, county of New York. NIF financially supports many companies that work to undermine the state of Israel. As set forth in more detail below, NIF has crossed the line from permissible advocacy to unlawful "electioneering." Put another way, NIF is violating the tax codes by attempting to influence the outcome of elections. As stated on its own web site, NIF works on its “concerted campaign to equip Israel’s pro-democracy and progressive forces with the tools to fight Israel’s regressive right-and win.” As set forth in more detail below, NIF's activities are flagrant and unlawful electioneering in violation of the tax code. 2. Who is the Whistleblower? I am a New York attorney and political activist who regularly engages in pro- Israel litigation in state and federal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2018 Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Mohamad Batal Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Batal, Mohamad, "Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism" (2018). CMC Senior Theses. 1826. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1826 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Submitted To Professor George Thomas by Mohamad Batal for Senior Thesis Spring 2018 April 23, 2018 ii iii iv Abstract: This thesis begins with an explanation of Israel’s foundational constitutional tension—namely, that its identity as a Jewish State often conflicts with liberal- democratic principles to which it is also committed. From here, I attempt to sketch the evolution of the state’s constitutional principles, pointing to Chief Justice Barak’s “constitutional revolution” as a critical juncture where the aforementioned theoretical tension manifested in practice, resulting in what I call illiberal or undemocratic “moments.” More profoundly, by introducing Israel’s constitutional tension into the public sphere, the Barak Court’s jurisprudence forced all of the Israeli polity to confront it. My next chapter utilizes the framework of a bill currently making its way through the Knesset—Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People—in order to draw out the past and future of Israeli civic identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apartheid Smear Israel Is Not an Apartheid State the Allegation Damages the Peace Process
    The ApArTheid SmeAr Israel is not an apartheid state The allegation damages the peace process Professor Alan Johnson BRITAIN ISRAEL COMMUNICATIONS & RESEARCH CENTRE 2 The Apartheid Smear As a movement we recognise the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognise the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism. We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigour support the Palestinian right to national self-determination. We are gratified to see that new possibilities of resolving the issue through negotiation have arisen since the election of a new government in Israel. We would wish to encourage that process, and if we have the opportunity, to assist.1 Nelson mandela, 1993 The whole world must see that Israel must exist and has the right to exist, and is one of the great outposts of democracy in the world … Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.2 martin Luther King Jr, 1967 The charge that Israel is an apartheid state is a false and malicious one that precludes, rather than promotes, peace and harmony.3 Judge richard J. Goldstone (former Justice of the South African Constitutional Court, who led the United Nations 2008-9 fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict), 2011 If Israel were an apartheid state, I, for example, would not be allowed to work for a Jewish newspaper or live in a Jewish neighbourhood or own a home. The real apartheid is in Lebanon, where there is a law that bans Palestinians from working in over 50 professions.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 230 November 2017
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 11, November 2017 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem • Clashes erupted between Palestinians and Israeli occupation Army (IOA) in Bethlehem city following a march commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. Palestinian protesters marched from the southern to northern ends of the city, until they reached Israel’s separation wall. The IOA quickly suppressed the protest, using live ammunition, rubber-coated steel bullets and tear gas, injuring one with a rubber-coated steel bullet in the foot, while several others suffered from severe tear gas inhalation. (Maannews 1 November 2017) • A Palestinian, identified as Walid Jadallah, 40, from the northern West Bank city of Nablus, was detained after the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) broke into a coffee shop he owns in the Cinema Area, in the center of Bethlehem city. (IMEMC 1 November 2017) • The Israeli Occupation army (IOA) stormed As Saff Street, in the center of the West Bank city of Bethlehem, and abducted Shadi Mohammad al-Hreimi, 29, after ransacking his home. (IMEMC 3 November 2017) • The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided Um Rukba area and Zuhor Al Amal south of Al Khader village and stormed Palestinians houses and lands amid strict security measures. (WAFA 5 November 2017) • The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) detained two Palestinians from Al Azzah refugee camp north of Bethlehem city.
    [Show full text]
  • Community to Celebrate Purim on March 12 TI/TC Adult Ed. Group
    March 3-9, 2017 Published by the Jewish Federation of Greater Binghamton Volume XLVI, Number 9 BINGHAMTON, NEW YORK Community to celebrate Purim on March 12 JCC to hold community Communitywide celebration Purim Carnival of Purim in Ithaca By Lynette Errante have created surprise themed costumes Many of the Jewish organizations and read every year, along with many The Jewish Community Center Youth each year for the event. Harry Cohen, in Ithaca will celebrate Purim together other activities. Department will host its annual Purim Kids Connection lead teacher, said, “This this year with the entire community. The Organizers of the event include Con- Carnival on Sunday, March 12, in the au- year’s costumes will be extra colorful and carnival will be held on Sunday, March gregation Tikkun v’Or, the Ithaca Area ditorium of the JCC, 500 Clubhouse Rd., we’ll be ready to dance, dance, dance!” 12, from 2:30-5:30 pm, at the Space at United Jewish Community and Temple Vestal. The event will be held at a new Activities at the event will include carni- GreenStar, 700 W. Buffalo St., Ithaca. Beth-El. Entertainment will include belly time this year, from 1-3 pm. The family val games, a bounce house, inflatable slides, The community has been invited to learn dancing, a magician, a balloon artist and friendly event will be open to the entire baseball, arts and crafts, a special toddler about the holiday and enjoy its traditions, live music by the Cornell Middle Eastern community. Admission will cost $5 per area, face painting and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Advocating for a Sustainable and Viable Resolution of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Report on the Israeli Settlement Activities in the occupied State of Palestine Volume 2, February 2017 Issue Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem http://www.arij.org Bethlehem • In Bethlehem Governorate, the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided the al-Nashash area in the village of al-Khader and sealed a car wash after claiming that the imprisoned owners, Abed al-Minam and Dirar Muhammad Salah, were accused of planting an explosive device near an Israeli military site in November last year. The brothers were detained by the IOA last year after a similar raid. (Maannews 1 February 2017) • The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) notified to halt the construction of a car repair shop in Um Rukba area in Al Khader village west of Bethlehem city. The shop is owned by Abdullah Muhamamd Salah and was notified of demolition under the pretext of unlicensed Building. (ALQUDS 1 February 2017). • The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) and bulldozers razed 12 dunums of land planted with Olive trees in Surif village in Hebron Governorate under the pretext of being previously cnonfiscatedby the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA). The razed land is owned by Ishaq Al Qadi and Muhammad Ghneimat. • The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) and bulldozers raided “Al Batta” area in Al Jab’a village southwest of Bethlehem city, razed and uprooted a number of Olive trees in the area owned by citizen Ahmad Muhammad Masha’la.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary: the Court System Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    17.8.2016 The Judiciary: The Court System ﻓﺎﺭﺳﯽ Русский עברית ﻋﺭﺑﻲ English Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs MEnFgAlish ss RoomﻋeﺭrﺑﻲP MFA Press Room About the Ministry Consular Services Foreign Policy International Orgs About Israel Diplomacy in Video t the MinistryעuבoריbתA MFA About Israel State Democracy The Judiciary: The Court System CРуoсnсsкuиlaйr Services Democracy The Judiciary: The Court System ign PolicyﻓeﺎrﺭoﺳﯽF Tools and Information Courts' Directorate International Orgs Contact us 22 Kanfei Nesharim, Jerusalem Tel. (02) 6556789 Contact info About Israel Fax. (02) 6556705 Israeli missions worldwide Judicial Authority website Diplomacy in Video Subscribe to RSS FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURE Subscribe to Newsletters The law courts constitute a separate, independent unit within Consular services FAQ the Ministry of Justice. The Director of Courts is a judge, Treaties and Agreements appointed to this position by the Minister of Justice, pursuant to Section 82 of the Courts Law (Consolidated Text) 5744­1984; Historical Documents he is responsible to the Minister for the orderly operation of the null various judicial instances. The Organization of Courts of Law is managed by the Directorate of Courts, headed by the Director of Courts. The system is headed by the President of the Supreme Court of Law, and the Minister of Justice. The organization of the Courts of Law in Israel includes all the Courts of Law in Israel: 1. The Supreme Court 2. The District Courts of Law 3. The Magistrates Courts (the first instance) ­ and in general, the Court of Traffic Offenses, Family Courts and Juvenile Courts 4. National Labor Court 5. Regional Labor Courts In addition, the organization also includes the Bailiff Office that works, according to the law, linked to the Magistrates Court and the Center for Collection of unpaid fees and expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Keshet Insight Seminar 2016 the Great Balancing Act: to Be a Democratic, Jewish State with a Large Arab Minority - from Herzl to Today January 31 – February 6, 2016
    Keshet Insight Seminar 2016 The Great Balancing Act: To Be a Democratic, Jewish State with a Large Arab Minority - From Herzl to Today January 31 – February 6, 2016 When Theodor Herzl envisioned a Jewish State in his book, Altneuland, he imagined a country that would be both a Jewish homeland and a liberal society guaranteeing equal rights to Jews and non-Jews alike. In the Declaration of Independence, David Ben Gurion used similar language, despite the fact that he had no illusions about the realities of the historical conflict between Jews and Arabs in what had been Palestine. Today, the annual Keshet Insight Seminar will take the opportunity to reflect on the progress made by Israel in achieving this goal in light of the harsh realities of the Middle East. We will devote a very intensive week to examining the challenges posed to Israel’s political system, morality, security and self-identification in light of the fact that over 20% of its population defines itself as being either Israeli Arab or Palestinian Israeli. Sunday, January 31: HISTORY VS. NARRATIVE . Visit Tel Aviv University's Dayan Center for briefings from experts, including a historical survey of the attitude of Zionists to the “Arab Problem” and of Arab nationalists to the “Jewish Problem," a historical analysis of Arab resistance to the Partition Plan, the creation of the refugee problem, and the evolution of Israeli-Arab self-identity and Palestinian nationalism. Explore the microcosm of Jaffa to gain insight into the controversial 1948 battle as well as the current reality of life in a mixed Jewish-Arab city.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish and Democratic Law: Redrawing Boundaries
    Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Law With the support of the Zahava and Moshael J. Straus Family Foundation The Center for Jewish and Democratic Law (in establishment) The Inaugural Conference Jewish and Democratic Law: Redrawing Boundaries December 28-30, 2015 Day 1: Monday, December 28 Feldman building 301, Senate Hall, 2nd floor 14:30—15:00 – Lunch (conference participants) Feldman building 301, Weisfeld Hall, ground floor 14:45—15:00 – Registration and refreshments 15:00—15:30 Greetings Rabbi Prof. Daniel Hershkowitz, President, Bar-Ilan University Prof. Yaffa Zilbershats, Head of the Planning and Budgeting Committee, Council for Higher Education Prof. Miriam Faust, Rector, Bar-Ilan University 15:45 – 16:00 Why Israel Needs Jewish and Democratic Law Prof. Shahar Lifshitz, Dean, Faculty of Law, Bar-Ilan University 16:00—17:30 Session 1: Round Table: “Jewish and Democratic” as an intellectual puzzle – defining a research agenda What are the theoretical challenges invoked by a constitutional agenda that couples ethno-national identity with a liberal political morality? The discussion will seek to elucidate the state of the research on issues of constitutional identity, multiculturalism, and law and religion, with a focus on gaps in existing knowledge and on the possibility of methodological innovation in treating them. Panelists will be asked to reflect on their experiences in studying and teaching these issues, and to suggest open questions and future trajectories for their scholarly fields. Moderator: Prof. Joseph Weiler, President of the European University Institute Participants: Prof. Aharon Barak, Radzyner Law School, IDC Herzliya; former President of the Supreme Court of Israel Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Deputy President (Ret.) Justice Salim Joubran
    Deputy President (ret.) Justice Salim Joubran Curriculum Vitae Born 4 August 1947 1963 Graduated from the Terra Sancta School of the Franciscan Order in Acre 1968 Graduated from the Law Faculty at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem 1970 Admitted to the Israeli Bar Association 1970-1982 Head of a private practice 1982-1993 Judge at the Magistrate Court in Haifa 1993 Appointed Judge of the District Court in Haifa 2004 Appointed Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel JUNE 2017 Appointed Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Israel Member of the Selection Committee of Judges in Israel Chairperson of the Central Elections Committee to the 20th Knesset (The Israeli Parliament) Member of the board of directors of the French Hospital "Saint Vincent de- Paul in Nazareth Member of the Board of the "Jewish-Arab Center" at the University of Haifa Member of the Board of Trustees at the University of Haifa Doctor of Philosophy from University of Haifa, "honoris Causa" 1 Recipient of the Merit award of the DECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS, Chicago, U.S.A., 2016 President of the Israel Association of Public Law Chairman of the Board of Directors of the "Kav Mashve" Association for the Advancement of Equality in the Employment of Arab Academics Chairman of the advisory Committee of Aron Institute program for research of the Arab Sector economy at the IDC Herzelya Chairman of the investment Committee of the first libra investing in Justice Fund Member of the international advisory Council of the Israeli Democracy Institute Positions Held: Chairman of "Zeltner
    [Show full text]