Long Term Pavement Performance of the James Bay Access Road
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prof Hanif Kara
•• Professor in Practice of Architectural Technology at Harvard GSD •• Member of Harvard GSD Faculty Board for Executive Education Division •• Visiting Professor of Architectural Technology at KTH Stockholm (2008 – 2012) •• First structural engineer to be appointed as CABE Commissioner (2008 – 2012) •• One of fifteen members of the ‘Design for London’ Advisory Group to the Mayor of London (2007 – 2008) •• Member of the Architecture Foundation’s Board of Trustees •• Member of 2011 RIBA Stirling Awards Jury •• External examiner for the Architectural Association •• Awarded the ACE Engineering Ambassador of the Year 2011 •• Member of Design Council CABE, London Design Panel 2012 •• Member of Aga Khan Award for Architecture Master Jury 2004 and Steering Committee 2015 •• Member of the New London Sounding Board •• Review Panel - Swiss National Science Foundation, NCCR Digital Fabrication Prof Hanif Kara BSc (Hons) CEng FIStructE FICE FREng Hon FRIBA FRSA Co-founder and director of AKT II Hanif Kara is a principal and co-founder of London-based structural engineering practice AKT II, as well as an educator. Under his leadership the practice has, in the last decade, gained an international standing in the field of the built environment. Since forming AKT II (originally as His contribution to the industry has board of trustees for the Architecture Adams Kara Taylor) in 1996, he has been been recognised by professional bodies, Foundation. responsible for a number of innovative where he is a fellow member of the Royal In the global context, the Aga Khan and pioneering projects but also for Academy of Engineering, the Institute Award for Architecture is recognised as raising the profile of ‘design’, both in of Civil Engineers and the Institute of one of the most important awards in the the construction industry and the wider Structural Engineers. -
Broadback River in James Bay
ROADBAC B A Wild Ride Down the Rupert River’s Southern Neighbour K photo: Fabien Coulombe Fabien photo: The estuary of the Broadback River in James Bay. Miles of water but only inches deep, especially if you don’t have the proper tidal tables. By LESTER KOVAC Luckily, the main group eventually responded to our calls and we found Eventually, I found, on the internet, a person who paddled the whole bridge, we were greeted by truck drivers going to and from the nearby them just as we left them - tired and quiet. At least the bugs were merciful; Broadback; however, she was about to embark on a one year journey mine. e were pushing through the dense forest carpeted with muskeg, they were almost non-existent. By that time I fi gured out the mysteries of my throughout Southeast Asia and Australia and she wrote me only one email It was great to get the fi rst feel of the river. It was quite narrow at the when the GPS receiver started to beep, letting me know that the GPS receiver and was able to track it east to the food barrels. Afterwards, we confi rming that her party was able to portage through the Longue Pointe top, but it didn’t miss the power and gradient. We were caught in the middle end of the portage should be right where we were. However, there were able to push through the dense woods another 200 m to the rocky shores peninsula (signifi cant shortcut on the huge Lac Evans in the middle of the of the rapids by the rain – the fi rst sign of the weather to come (overall Wwere no signs of water anywhere near us. -
JAMES BAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN James Bay to Be a Long Life, Low Cost Spodumene Project
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT / MEDIA RELEASE ASX ANNOUNCEMENT / MEDIA RELEASE Australia 9 March 2021 JAMES BAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN James Bay to be a long life, low cost spodumene project Galaxy Resources Limited (ASX: GXY, “Galaxy” or the “Company”) is leveraging its portfolio of world-class development assets to create a sustainable, large scale, global lithium chemicals business. Galaxy advises the release of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) for its wholly owned, James Bay Lithium Mine Project (“James Bay” or the “Project”) located in Québec, Canada. With achievement of this milestone, Galaxy will now advance the project directly into the basic engineering phase. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Project details Strategically located close to emerging electric vehicle markets in North America and Europe Average annual production of 330ktpa of spodumene concentrate with an ~18-year mine life Shallow, near-surface mineralisation ideal for open cut mining with a low life-of-mine (“LOM”) strip ratio of 3.7: 1 2mtpa process plant designed to produce industry standard SC6 spodumene concentrate Very similar process design and flowsheet to that successfully employed at Mt Cattlin Site power to be supplied by Hydro-Québec, a low-cost, sustainable source of clean energy Mineral Resource of 40.3Mt at 1.4% Li2O, with a maiden Ore Reserve expected to be declared later in the year Excellent relationship with the Cree Nation of Eastmain, Cree Nation Government and all stakeholders Project financials Capital Cost estimate of US$244 million (Class 5 estimate) -
The James Bay Hydroelectric Project - Issue of the Century
Guest Editorial: The James Bay Hydroelectric Project - Issue of the Century When Robert Bourassa unveiled the first phase of the James Bay hydroelectric project in the early 1970s, he called it “the project of the century.” This seemed an appropriate term for a scheme that would alter 19 waterways, create 27 reservoirsand cost tens of billions ofdollars. Apart from the Cree inhabitants and a handful of environmental activists, the project had few opponents. As described in a Hydro-Quebec brochure, “the territory, now being molded to man’s needs” seemed too remote and too vast to warrant much concern. Twenty years later, circumstances have changed dramatically. The “project of the century” is becoming the issue of the century as a broad base of opposition forms against it. Biologists, economists, energy experts, anthropologists, plus a growing number of well-informed individuals and groups in Canada and the United States have joined with the Cree and certain Inuit to oppose further hydroelectric development in the region. No longer remote, the James Bay territory, its environment and its people have become subjects of national and international importance. The reason for this shift is not that the second phase of the James Bay project is to be any larger or have a greater environmental impact than thefirst. In fact, theproject already completed in the basin of La Grande River islarger than thatwhich Hydro-Quebec is now preparing to develop on the Great Whale River. The Great Whale project will generate 3168 megawatts of electricity, compared with almost 15 000 for La Grande, and will flood 4400 km2 of land, compared with 9675. -
Regional Development the Cree of James Bay, Quebec
Regional development the Cree of James Bay, Quebec Mike McGee, Ec.D. This paper will focus on how the Cree have had to adapt and put in force various policies and measures that they felt would best serve their people after the signing of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The material that was researched, as well as the author's personal experience, will provide an insight into how the Cree set up their own government structures, businesses and institutions since the signing of the agreement. Through a historical examination of their advancement to modern day society and advanced technology, this paper will demonstrate how the Cree have maintained their traditions, culture and beliefs by dealing with their own issues and problems from within. The paper concludes with a number of observations and recommendations. Keywords: Aboriginal, Cree, regional and social development, government Introduction This paper will focus on how the Cree have had to adapt and put in force various policies and measures that they felt would best serve their people after the signing of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The material that was researched, as well as the author's personal experience, will provide an insight into how the Cree set up their own government structures, businesses and institutions since the signing of the agreement. The author has lived and worked in James Bay for the past 19 years and has been employed for the past 10 years as the Director of Economic Development for the Cree Nation of Wemindji. Being also part of the community through marriage, the author has also been actively involved in many of the decision-making processes within the Cree government and local Band Council. -
Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain, Missisquoi Bay, and the Richelieu River
Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain, Missisquoi Bay, and the Richelieu River Draft Report prepared by: New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission Lake Champlain Basin Program Organisme de basin versant de la baie Missisquoi For : International Joint Commission Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Background, Purpose, and Scope 2 1.2 Prior IJC Work in the Lake Champlain Basin 3 1.2.1 Causeway Removal Water Quality Study 3 1.2.2 Identification of Critical Source Areas 4 1.2.3 Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Flood Mitigation Studies 4 1.3 Study Areas 5 1.3.1 Lake Champlain 5 1.3.2 Richelieu River 6 1.3.3 Missisquoi Bay 6 1.4 Literature Review and Quality Assurance 9 2 Key Nutrient Loading and Cyanobacteria Issues 9 2.1 Overview of Nutrient Loading and Cyanobacteria Issues in Lake Champlain and Missisquoi Bay 9 2.2 Detailed Analyses of Missisquoi Bay and Its Sub-Basin 12 2.2.1 Hydrodynamics 14 2.2.2 Nutrient Enrichment 14 Dynamics, Sources, and Causes 14 2.2.3 Cyanobacteria Blooms 19 Cyanobacteria & Cyanotoxins 19 Sources and Causes 22 2.2.4 Health Risks and Recreational Impacts 23 2.2.5 Economic Impacts 25 3 Overview of Potential In-Lake Restoration Measures and Technologies 26 3.1 International Overview of Restoration Efforts and Results 26 3.1.1 Canada 26 3.1.2 U.S. 27 Commonly Used In-Lake Restoration Techniques 27 Regional Lake Restoration Efforts 28 3.2 Effectiveness Results and Analysis, Estimated Cost-Benefit, and Adaptability to Missisquoi Bay 35 4 Programs and Policies Influencing Key -
Transportation Plan of Nord-Du-Québec I
TRANSPORTATION PLAN OF NORD-DU-QUEBEC PREANALYSIS Final work document April 2002 Luc Adam, Service des liaisons avec les partenaires et usagers, DATNQ Adami Alaku, Administration régionale Kativik Luc Ampleman, agent de recherche, Services des inventaires et plan, DATNQ Josée Arseneault, coordonnatrice aux affaires autochtones, MTQ François Beaudry, secrétariat général, MTQ Michelle Bélanger, agente de bureau, DATNQ Denis Blais, chef de service, Services des inventaires et plan, DATNQ Andrée Champagne, agente de secrétariat, Services des inventaires et plan, DATNQ Martin Desgagnés, bureau du Grand Conseil des Cris Daniel Dorais, directeur, DATNQ Luc Ferland, Conseil régional de développement de la Baie James Mario Grenier, chef de service, Centre de services d’Amos Anick Guimond, agente de recherche, Services des inventaires et plan, DATNQ Marie Lalancette, agente de recherche, Services des inventaires et plan, DATNQ Josepi Padlayat, Conseil régional de développement Katutjinik Charles Roy, chef de service, Centre de services de Chibougamau ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Transportation Plan team wishes to thank all those who, by their comments and suggestions, have contributed to the writing of this document. The document was prepared by the Service des inventaires et plan of Direction de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue–Nord-du- Québec in cooperation with the Service des liaisons avec les partenaires et usagers of the Ministère des Transports. For any further information, please contact: Ministère des Transports Service des inventaires et plan 80, avenue Québec Rouyn-Noranda (Québec) J9X 6R1 Telephone: (819) 763-3237 Fax: (819) 763-3493 E-mail: www.mtq.qc.ca/regions/abitibi/plan_nord-en.html Website: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. -
Compensation Policy Issue
United Nations Environment Programme Dams and Development Project Compendium on Relevant Practices - 2nd Stage Compensation Policy Issue Monetary compensation for lost assets and loss of access to resources Livelihood restoration and enhancement Community development Catchment development Final Report Prepared by: Mr. Vincent ROQUET, Sociologist and Planner, Lead Consultant with Ms. Carine DUROCHER, Anthropologist Vincent Roquet & Associates Inc. 560 Sainte-Croix Avenue, suite 101, Montreal (Quebec) Canada, H4L 3X5 Tel: +1 (514) 849-3030; Fax: +1 (514) 849-3322 Email: [email protected] September 15th, 2006 Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... vi 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Context........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Objective........................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Process.............................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Contents of Final Report............................................................................................................. 2 2 – METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................................. -
Discipline Decision 18-013
THE DISCIPLINE FILE Date: December 17, 2018 Case No.: 18-013 RDO IN THE MATTER OF THE ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCE PROFESSIONS ACT, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDUCT OF NORMAND N. FALLU, P.ENG. The Investigative Committee of the Association of Profes- the relevant time of the collusion scheme (2005- sional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) 2010). has conducted an investigation into the conduct of Nor- 3. The Member voluntarily cancelled his membership mand N. Fallu, P.Eng. (“the Member”). with the OIQ on April 1, 2013, upon his transfer by The investigation was conducted with respect to a Dessau to Calgary, Alberta. complaint initiated by the Deputy Registrar and Chief Reg- 4. The Member became a Professional Member of ulatory Officer (CRO) of APEGA, Matthew Oliver, P.Eng., APEGA on April 9, 2013. (“the Complainant”) on February 22, 2018. The complaint related to a disciplinary proceeding initiated against the 5. In May 2013 the Member was terminated by Member by the Ordre des ingeniéurs du Québec (OIQ). Dessau after he was identified as a person of interest in the Charbonneau Commission. The A. BACKGROUND Charbonneau Commission, which commenced in 2011, was established by the Government of The Complainant filed a complaint against the Member Quebec to investigate corruption in the granting and alleging the Member had participated in a contract management of public contracts in the construction collusion scheme and obstructed the OIQ investigation. industry. B. THE COMPLAINT 6. In the fall of 2013 the Member was hired by Stantec in Alberta. The Complainant referred the matter to APEGA's 7. -
Transportation Plan
Transportation plan Transportation TRANSPORTATION PLAN OF NORD-DU-QUÉBEC ANALYSIS ENGLISH VERSION Contents Regional Portrait . .1 Safety . .23 Socioeconomic Growth . .39 Mobility of People and Goods . .55 Environment, Land-Use Planning and Sustainable Development . .75 Acknowledgements We wish to thank all those who have contributed in the making of the Analysis prepared by the Coordination du Nord-du-Québec – Ministère des Transports. For more information, contact: Ministère des Transports Coordination du Nord-du-Québec 80, avenue Québec Rouyn-Noranda (Québec) J9X 6R1 Telephone: (819) 763-3237 Fax: (819) 763-3493 Email: [email protected] Web Site: www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/regions/abitibi/plan_nord.asp Cette publication a été réalisée par le ministère des Transports du Québec. Dépôt légal – 1er trimestre 2005 Bibliothèque nationale du Québec ISBN 2-550-43888-4 Printed in February 2005 Graphic design : www.agencesecrete.com Regional Portrait Portrait of Population and Territory • The administrative region of Nord-du-Québec covers 840 000 km2 and accounts for 55% of the area of Québec. • Two distinct territories compose the region: -North of the 55th parallel, Nunavik covers nearly 490 000 km2 for a population of 10 410 inhabitants in 2001. The population is gathered in 14 Inuit municipalities and a Cree village located along the coasts of Hudson Bay, Hudson Strait and Ungava Bay. They are Kuujjuarapik, Umiujaq, Inukjuak, Puvirnituq, Akulivik, Ivujivik, Salluit, Kangiqsujuaq, Quaqtaq, Kangirsuk, Aupaluk, Tasiujaq, Kuujjuaq and Kangiqsualujjuaq, and the Cree village of Whapmagoostui. These villages are not linked by road. -Between the 49th and 55th parallel, covering approximately 350 000 km2, is located the James Bay territory. -
Cree Vision of Plan Nord
2 Special thanks to John Farrington of Farrington Media and Gaston Cooper of Creephotos for their photo contribution. 4 Table of Contents PREFACE ..............................................................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................15 1.1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................15 1.2 WHO ARE THE CREE? .............................................................................................................................................16 1.3 EEYOU ISTCHEE: THE TERRITORY OF THE CREE .......................................................................................................16 1.4 CREE USE AND OCCUPATION OF THE TERRITORY ...................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 2 – GOVERNANCE ...............................................................................................................................................19 2.1 THE CREE MUST PARTICIPATE FULLY IN THE GOVERNANCE OF EEYOU ISTCHEE ......................................................19 2.2 JBNQA VISION........................................................................................................................................................20 -
The James Bay Northern Quebec Agreement Mackenzie Kirkey Bishop’S University
Mackenzie Kirkey 85 THE JAMES BAY NORTHERN QUEBEC AGREEMENT Mackenzie Kirkey Bishop’s University Abstract This paper seeks to examine the 1975 James Bay Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA). The Agreement is notable for officially sanctioning the largest hy- droelectric development project in Quebec’s history and has often been cited as Canada’s most progressive and comprehensive land-claims settlement. This research paper argues that the JBNQA remains an incomplete and unfulfilled accord. While the agreement has clearly provided benefits for the province of Quebec, as well as the Cree of the eastern James Bay region and the Inuit of northern Quebec, a range of concerns surrounding the implementation can be identified. Résumé Cet article porte sur la Convention de la Baie James et du Nord québécois de 1975 qui a officiellement sanctionné le plus grand projet hydroélectrique de l’histoire du Québec et qui est souvent présentée comme le règlement le plus progressiste et le plus complet des revendications territoriales au Canada. Cet essai soutient que la Convention demeure un traité incomplet et non rempli. En effet, bien que la Convention ait résolument procuré des bénéfices au Québec ainsi qu’aux Cris de l’est de la baie James et aux Inuits du nord du Québec, il est possible d’identifier de nombreuses préoccupations quant à son exécution. Introduction he James Bay Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) of 1975 is Toften regarded “as Canada’s first modern land-claim settlement” – a settlement, decidedly progressive in its scope and breadth, reached between the province of Quebec and the Cree of the eastern James Bay region and Inuit of northern Quebec.1 This essay will argue, however, that the JBNQA – officially sanctioning the largest hydroelectric 86 JOURNAL OF EASTERN TOWNSHIPS STUDIES (indeed, economic) development project in Quebec’s history – can most fully be understood as an initial, incomplete, and unfulfilled accord.