Mass Control

! MASS CONTROL: Engineering Human Consciousness Jim Keith Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness Copyright 1999, 2003 by Jim Keith All rights reserved Published by Adventures Unlimited Press Kempton, Illinois 60946 USA www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com ISBN 1-931882-21-5 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 For the Inhabitants of Planet 9 After the publication of my book Mind Control, World Control, I was contacted by many persons with new information on the subject of human control, both researchers in the field as well as some persons who believe that they have been the subject of abuse by intelligence and other agencies. The necessity for an update and an expansion of my earlier research became apparent. This book is the result. As always, I was greatly assisted by my personal friends, network of fellow researchers, and readership. Special thanks are due my family who continue to tolerate my odd hours and bohemian brain-style, and to my publishers, to whom I owe much gratitude. “What luck for rulers that men do not think.” —Adolf Hitler Contents 1. Origins of Control 2. Perfecting Inhumanity 3. Dumbing Us to Death 4. Tavistock 5. Injecting Ideology 6. Subverting Sex 7. The CIA and Control 8. Estabrooks and the Manchurian Candidate 9. Dr. Cameron’s Chamber of Horrors 10. Electronic Implants and Dr. Delgado 11. Turn On, Tune In, Become a Robot 12. Jolly West and the Violence Center 13. Occult Connections 14. Consolidating Control 15. Guerrilla Mindwar 16. The Greening of America: Monarch 17. Claudia Mullen 18. Brice Taylor 19. Katherine Sullivan 20. Evaluating MONARCH 21. Concealing Mind Control Abuse 22. Electronic Mind Control 23. Mind Prison 24. Beam Warfare 25. The Persinger Plan 26. Psi War 27. Hardwiring Humans 28. Dreamscape 29. One-World Brain Afterword Chapter 1 Origins of Control Agents of the world’s elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of Earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, a greed so pervasive that it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed. It is the philosophy of mass control, that ultimately aims at dictating every aspect of human life—even remolding man’s perception of reality and himself. Although the lust for control can be discerned since the beginning of recorded history, a nexus of particular importance arose in Germany in the latter half of the 19th century. As the country increased in military and industrial might, becoming the strongest power in Europe, a revolution simultaneously took place in German philosophic and scientific thought that paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive technological change as well as to birth innumerable toxic children. According to one source: “The sudden change from relative political weakness to world power and from economic insecurity to prosperity proved to be a great strain on the German character and public life. The spread of materialistic philosophy of life was world-wide in this age, and the idolatry of power was not confined to Germany, but its corrosive effect was particularly strong in a country that was not inured to power.”1 One aspect of this transformation, this “idolatry of power” was a negative transformation of the psychological sciences. In the late 19th century, earlier more humanistic approaches to understanding mankind were replaced by a scientific philosophy that would be employed less as a measure for the understanding of man than as a justification for a new feudalism and a mechanism of pure control. The materialist overhauling of psychology was in great part ushered in by the work of the German psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt. Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the University of Leipzig, and in 1875 established the world’s first psychological laboratory there, a move that would eventually turn the world of more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head. Interesting, but Wundt’s grandfather is documented as having been a member of the Illuminati secret society, making it not unreasonable to imagine that herr professor may also have been a member of that group. Wundt, in reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in German thought that began with Schopenhauer at the beginning of the 19th century and that was to be later epitomized by Karl Marx, rejected in cavalier fashion the notion that man might have a soul or deeper significance than the merely physical, that he was in fact anything more than an animal. Following this line of reasoning, an approach that came to be known in psychology as Structuralism, Wundt insisted that all psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of body reactions. The truth of man, Wundt insisted, could be determined solely through mechanistic means: measurement, analysis, and dissection of bodies. After Wundt had thoroughly infused the psychological sciences with his materialist approach, many scientists—and the members of the ruling class that employed them—believed that they were justified in treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as an overall plan of action, proceeded to do so. The materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at least twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt’s students between the years 1883 and 1893, with more of the German’s acolytes fanning out to infiltrate related fields, such as education. Wundt’s materialistic approach would infect the thinking of most of the influential psychologists, psychiatrists, educators, and social planners who would follow in the 20th century.2 One man who marched to Wundt’s dirge was the Russian, Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. Pavlov conducted a wide-ranging research into techniques of control, primarily using dogs for his experimentation. In the now-famous experiment, Pavlov fed his dogs, stimulating salivation, while at the same time ringing a bell. After doing this many times, Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in reaction to the sound of the bell alone. Other of Pavlov’s experiments involved rewarding dogs with petting, or punishing them with pain. Using these kinds of approaches, Pavlov developed his theory of the conditioned reflex, demonstrating that animals are motivated by patterns of conditioned response, and that conditioning can be artificially induced. The results of Pavlov’s experiments did not escape the social planners of his day, nor those who would follow. Notes: 1. “Germany—History Since 1850,” Encyclopedia Americana. New York: Americana Corporation, 1963 2. Lionni, Paolo. The Leipzig Connection. Sheridan, Oregon: Delphian Press, 1988; “Germany—History Since 1850”; Wood, Samuel and Ellen Green. The World of Psychology, third edition, at www.prenticehall.ca/wood; Weiten, Wayne. “A New Science is Born: The Contributions of Wundt and Hall,” Psychology: Themes and Variations. 3rd edition, at http://psychology.wadworth.com/book Chapter 2 Perfecting Inhumanity A time-dishonored approach to the manipulation of man kind is through the philosophy and techniques of eugenics. This is the attempted ‘perfecting’ of humanity through genetic means: selective breeding, sterilization, biological manipulation, and even murder for those considered unfit. The study of eugenics has its beginning in Germany, sometime after the mid-19th century mark, stimulated by volkish concerns for Aryan racial purity. Rudolf Virchow, pathologist and politician, began a study of national ethnic statistics in 1871, convinced that the majority of Germans would prove to be of relatively pure Nordic descent. The results of his studies proved otherwise. According to Virchow, the obvious solution was to set about Nordicizing the debased German stock.1 The popularity of eugenics theories was given a jump-start in England by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. In 1869 Galton published his book Hereditary Genius, that Cornell University anthropology professor Davydd Greenwood has called “an impassioned brief for hereditary aristocracy that became the first modern document of the modern eugenics movement.” Galton was the man who launched the ‘nature vs. nurture’ debate that quietly rages today, arguing for the domination of innate rather than acquired human abilities. It was Galton’s opinion that the human race could be improved by selective breeding and the extermination of the unfit. Galton once said that he hoped that eugenics would become “the religion of the future." In the latter part of the century, with endeavors like the Human Genome Project that seeks to map the entirety of human DNA, his hope seems to be moving toward fulfillment. Galton’s theories were influenced in part by his examination of the family trees of eminent stuffed shirts in England. He noted that most persons of accomplishment were related to each other—an aristocratic theory of intelligence—thus theoretically putting the aristocracy on a genetic pedestal and rationalizing a stratified society, or caste system, in Britain and the world. Even the name of the subject betrays something of its orientation. Galton derived the word eugenics from the Greek ‘eugenes’ meaning ‘well born.’ This aggrandizement of the privileged class was one of the reasons why eugenics research found ready support from the monied in both America and Europe; it justified their disdain for and parasitism of “the masses.”2 Chairs in Eugenics and Eugenics in Working Society were established at the University College in London in 1904, with the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics founded in 1907. In 1905, in the United States, the Rockefellers and Carnegies constructed the Eugenics Records Office at Cold Springs Harbor, New York, where genetic research (none dare call it eugenics) is still being done in 1999.3 In 1912 the first International Congress of Eugenics was convened at the University of London, presided over by its president, who also happened to be Charles Darwin’s son. Vice Presidents of the Congress included the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill; M.

Load more