Private Health Insurance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Health Insurance INDUSTRY COMMISSION PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE REPORT NO. 57 28 FEBRUARY 1997 Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 1997 ISBN 0 644 47628 1 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial usage or sale requires prior written permission from the Australian Government Publishing Service. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Commonwealth Information Services, AGPS, GPO Box 84, Canberra ACT 2601. Enquiries Industry Commission Level 3, Nature Conservation House Cnr Emu Bank & Benjamin Way PO Box 80 BELCONNEN ACT 2616 Phone: (06) 240 3200 Acknowledgments In conducting its inquiry, the Commission benefited greatly from the participation of a wide range of people and organisations. The Commission is grateful to all those who provided written submissions or gave freely of their time to discuss issues in various forums. Commissioners would also like to express their appreciation for the sustained efforts and commitment of their research team, who assisted in the preparation of this report against severe time constraints. Forming the Productivity Commission The Industry Commission, the former Bureau of Industry Economics and the Economic Planning Advisory Commission have amalgamated on an administrative basis to prepare for the formation of the Productivity Commission. Legislation formally establishing the new Commission is before Parliament. Canberra Office Post Office Box 80 BELCONNEN ACT 2616 Level 3 Nature Conservation House Cnr Emu Bank & Benjamin Way BELCONNEN ACT 2617 Telephone (06) 240 3200 Facsimile (06) 240 3399 Head Office Telephone (03) 9653 2100 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 28 February 1997 The Honourable Peter Costello MP Treasurer Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Treasurer In accordance with Section 7 of the Industry Commission Act 1989, we have pleasure in submitting to you the Commission’s final report on Private Health Insurance. Yours sincerely Gary Banks Helen Owens Brendon Kearney Executive Commissioner Commissioner Associate Commissioner (Presiding) CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS xxi GLOSSARY xxiii OVERVIEW xxix RECOMMENDATIONS li 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope of the inquiry 4 1.3 The inquiry process 6 1.4 Structure of the report 7 2 THE ROLE OF PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE IN 9 AUSTRALIA 2.1 Overview of the Australian health care system 9 2.2 Expenditure on health care 17 2.3 Role of private health insurance 22 3 THE REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL 31 ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Community rating 32 3.2 Reinsurance 41 3.3 Registration requirements 46 3.4 Requirements about products 53 3.5 Waiting periods and transfers 64 3.6 Approval of rules (including premiums) 66 3.7 Reserves 68 3.8 Complaints Commissioner 72 3.9 Negotiation between funds, hospitals and doctors 73 Page v PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE 3.10 Rebates and levy 78 3.11 Issues relating to Medibank Private 91 4 STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE INDUSTRY 95 4.1 Structure of the industry 95 4.2 Nature of the ‘product’ 102 4.3 Financial performance 105 4.4 Product and service innovation 122 4.5 Governance 130 5 COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE 137 5.1 Introduction 137 5.2 Participants’ comments on competition 138 5.3 How do health insurance organisations compete? 139 5.4 Market characteristics 144 5.5 Relative ease or difficulty of entry 145 5.6 Concluding comments 154 6 USERS OF HEALTH INSURANCE 157 6.1 Introduction 157 6.2 An overview of health insurance membership 157 6.3 Outlook for demand 166 6.4 Determinants of demand 167 7 WHY ARE PREMIUMS RISING? 195 7.1 Introduction 195 7.2 Background to recent premium increases 197 7.3 The major cost components 200 7.4 The major cost drivers 203 7.5 Impact of changes in hospital usage 205 7.6 Impact of changes in hospital bed day benefits 213 Page vi CONTENTS 7.7 Medical gap and prostheses 238 7.8 Other underlying factors 242 7.9 Health fund management costs 246 7.10 Reserves 248 7.11 Government policy and cost transfers 249 7.12 Impact of cost drivers on premiums 251 8 IMPROVING EFFICIENCY AND CONTAINING COSTS 257 8.1 Cost containment and efficiency 257 8.2 Nature of the problem 258 8.3 Contracting arrangements 259 8.4 Incentives within the system 260 8.5 Scope for enhancing efficiency 268 9 THE BROAD POLICY CONTEXT 291 9.1 Introduction 291 9.2 The broad policy context 291 9.3 Challenges faced by the health care system 294 9.4 Systemic reform options 296 10 POLICY OPTIONS 313 10.1 Introduction 313 10.2 Community rating 314 10.3 Other price regulations 326 10.4 Product regulations 328 10.5 Pre-existing ailment rules 334 10.6 Reinsurance 338 10.7 Governance and conduct of health insurance funds 353 10.8 Reserves 360 10.9 Changes to deal with consumer concerns 367 Page vii PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE 10.10 Cost containment and efficiency strategies 372 10.11 Tax and rebate regime 379 10.12 A wider inquiry? 384 11 IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS 387 11.1 Implementation strategies 387 11.2 Broad impacts 389 11.3 Impact on cost drivers 390 11.4 Impact on stakeholders 392 11.5 Summing up 399 APPENDICES A Terms of reference 401 B Participation in the inquiry 403 C Rating schemes 411 D Reinsurance 439 E Taxation issues 465 F Mandatory cover 475 G Scale economies in health insurance 483 H Hit and runs 491 I Health insurance costs 495 REFERENCES 519 BOXES 1.1 The private health insurance incentives 2 1.2 The vicious circle of falling membership 3 1.3 COAG and health system reform 5 2.1 Rationales for government involvement in health care 10 2.2 Medicare Principles 13 2.3 Roundtable remarks on the role of private health insurance 24 Page viii CONTENTS Boxes (cont’d) 3.1 Overview of regulation 32 3.2 The regulators 33 3.3 Community rating 33 3.4 Recent changes in the interpretation of community rating 34 3.5 APHA on the effects of community rating 35 3.6 SGIC on community rating in practice 37 3.7 Registration requirements 47 3.8 Product coverage and the 1995 amendments 53 3.9 Waiting periods for hospital cover 64 3.10 The Department’s preferred approach to solvency and 70 diversification 3.11 Complaints about health insurance received by the 74 Complaints Commissioner 3.12 Forms of contractual arrangement 75 3.13 The Trade Practices Act 77 3.14 Estimating the possible budgetary savings and costs of 88 the rebates/surcharge arrangements 4.1 Health insurance organisations 96 4.2 Mergers, acquisitions and closures 103 4.3 Types of cover 105 4.4 Front end deductibles and excesses 123 4.5 MBF’s revised governance arrangements 134 4.6 HCF’s governance arrangements 135 5.1 Legislative review provisions of the Competition Principles 137 Agreement 6.1 An illustration of risk pooling and risk aversion 168 6.2 Consumer submissions relating to affordability of insurance 176 during old age Page ix PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Boxes (cont’d) 6.3 “Dear Commissioner” ... Consumers speak out 192 7.1 Summary of factors underlying increases in hospital 196 insurance premiums 7.2 How a health fund sets its premiums 199 8.1 Competitive pressures — participants’ views 261 8.2 Charges for in-hospital medical services 266 8.3 Casemix classifications 280 8.4 Competing views on case payment 281 8.5 Taskforce on quality in Australian health care 286 8.6 Potential savings from coordinated care 289 9.1 Reform to private health insurance: a ‘pimple on 293 a pumpkin’? 9.2 Participants’ comments on systemic reform 298 9.3 Coordinated care trials 300 10.1 Problems affecting private health insurance 314 10.2 A tale of two people 316 10.3 Elective surgery products (ESPs) 329 10.4 The introduction of a no claim bonus? 333 10.5 The impact of reinsurance on catastrophe insurance 343 10.6 A takeover mechanism proposed by SGIO 356 10.7 The payments experience 368 10.8 A bigger role for public hospitals in providing elective 378 surgery to private patients? C.1 Modelling lifetime rating 415 C.2 Exit mechanisms for funded lifetime rating 419 C.3 Participants’ views on lifetime community rating systems 421 x CONTENTS Page Boxes (cont’d) C.4 Calculation of premiums under an unfunded lifetime 426 rating scheme C.5 Participants’ comments on differential waiting periods 431 C.6 The Singapore system of medical savings 435 C.7 Participants’ views on medical savings accounts 437 D.1 FED simulation model 454 I.1 A computer algorithm for solving the linear interpolation 501 method FIGURES 1.1 Private health insurance coverage and premiums 2 2.1 Linkages between health care consumers, payers 11 and providers 2.2 Another participant’s weighing up of the costs and benefits 16 of private health insurance 2.3 Australia’s health expenditure as a proportion of GDP 17 2.4 International comparison of expenditure per person, 1993 19 2.5 Expenditure by source of funds 1993–94 20 3.1 Hospital and ancillary claim rates (per SEU), by age 39 4.1 Major insurers’ share of members by state/territory, 100 30 June 1996 4.2 Concentration (as per cent of members) of three largest 101 insurers by state, June 1991 and June 1996 4.3 Trend rates of growth in financial indicators of registered 106 health insurance organisations, 1984–85 to 1995–96 4.4 Trend rates of growth in benefits paid, 1989–90 to 1995–96 107 4.5 Profit/loss ratios of health insurance organisations 108 4.6 Reserve to benefits ratio, 1984–85 to 1995–96 110 4.7 HCF’s investments, 1996 111 xi PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Page Figures (cont’d)
Recommended publications
  • Participant List
    PARTICIPANT LIST Please find below a list of current participants in the Quarterly Salary Review. For a complete list by super sector, sector and segment refer to Mercer WIN®. 3M Australia API 7-Eleven Stores API Management A Menarini Australia APL Co. (Aus) - BR A.P.Moller-Maersk AS (AU) Apotex Abbott Australasia APT Management Services (APA Group) AbbVie Aquila Resources Actelion Pharmaceuticals Australia Arrium Mining & Materials Adama Australia Arrow Electronics Australia Adelaide Brighton Asahi Beverages Australia Adelaide Football Club Asaleo Care Australia adidas Australia Ascendas Hospitality Australia Fund Management Adventist Healthcare Aspen Australia AECOM Astrazeneca Afton Chemical Asia Pacific LLC AT & T Global Network Services Australia Aggreko Australia ATCO Australia AIA Australia Atlas Iron Aimia Proprietary Loyalty Australia Ausenco Air New Zealand – Australia AusGroup Akzo Nobel Australia Australia Post Alcatel-Lucent Australia Australian Catholic University Alcon (Novartis) Laboratories Australia Australian Computer Society Alexion Australasia Australian Fashion Labels Allergan Australian Red Cross Blood Service Alphapharm Avaloq Australia Alstom Transport Australia Aveo Group Amadeus IT Pacific Aviall Australia American Express Global Business Travel Australia AVJennings Holdings Amgen Australia Avon Products AMT Group BaptistCare NSW & ACT Amway of Australia Barminco Apex Tool Group BASF Australia © March 2017 Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Quarterly Salary Review 4.1 PARTICIPANT LIST Beam Global Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Political Overview
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL OVERVIEW PHOTO: PAUL LOVELACE PHOTOGRAPHY Professor Ken Wiltshire AO Professor Ken Wiltshire is the JD Story Professor of Public Administration at the University of Queensland Business School. He is a Political long-time contributor to CEDA’s research and an honorary trustee. overview As Australia enters an election year in 2007, Ken Wiltshire examines the prospects for a long-established Coalition and an Opposition that has again rolled the leadership dice. 18 australian chief executive RETROSPECT 2006 Prime Minister and Costello as Treasurer. Opinion Politically, 2006 was a very curious and topsy-turvy polls and backbencher sentiment at the time vindi- … [Howard] became year. There was a phase where the driving forces cated his judgement. more pragmatic appeared to be the price of bananas and the depre- From this moment the Australian political than usual … dations of the orange-bellied parrot, and for a dynamic changed perceptibly. Howard had effec- nation that has never experienced a civil war there tively started the election campaign, and in the “ were plenty of domestic skirmishes, including same breath had put himself on notice that he culture, literacy, and history wars. By the end of the would have to win the election. Almost immedi- year both the government and the Opposition had ately he became even more pragmatic than usual, ” changed their policy stances on a wide range of and more flexible in policy considerations, espe- issues. cially in relation to issues that could divide his own Coalition. The defining moment For Kim Beazley and the ALP, Howard’s decision The defining moment in Australian politics was clearly not what they had wanted, despite their occurred on 31 July 2006 when Prime Minister claims to the contrary, but at least they now knew John Howard, in response to yet another effort to the lay of the battleground and could design appro- revive a transition of leadership to his Deputy Peter priate tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Content/Dam/Mercer/Attachments/Asia
    Participant profile List of contributors The following 370 organisations contributed to the 2020 Australian Benefits Review. 3M Australia Aquila Resources 7-Eleven Aristocrat Technologies Australia A. Menarini Australia Arrow Electronics Australia Abbott Australasia ARTC AbbVie Ascender Accenture Australia* Aspen Australia Acrux DDS Astellas Pharma Australia ADCO Constructions Astrazeneca Adelaide Brighton AT&T Global Network Services Australia* Adobe Systems Australia* ATCO Australia AECOM Australia Aurizon Holdings Agilent Technologies Ausenco AGL AusGroup AIA Australia Australian Premium Iron Management Akamai Technologies Netherlands Australian Turf Club Alliance Mineral Asset Autodesk* Alliance Mining Commodities AVJennings Amazon* B. Braun Australia AMD Australia* B. Braun Avitum Amdocs Australia* Baker McKenzie Amgen Australia Bausch and Lomb Amway Of Australia Baxter Healthcare APA Group Bayer Apple* Bechtel Australia 2.14 Australian Benefits Review © 2020 Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Participant profile Becton Dickinson Celine Australia* beIN Media Group CenturyLink Technology Australia Besins Healthcare Christian Dior Australia* Biogen Church & Dwight BIS Industries Cipla Bluewaters Power 2 Cisco Systems Australia* Bluewaters Power Services Citrix* Boehringer Ingelheim Clean TeQ Bolton Clarke Cleanaway Boston Scientific Clough Projects Bouygues Construction Australia CNH Industrial Bowen and Pomeroy Cochlear BP Australia Colgate-Palmolive* Brisbane City Council Collins Foods Bristol-Myers Squibb Computershare British
    [Show full text]
  • Selector Funds Management Limited ACN 102756347 AFSL 225316 Level 3, 10 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Tel 612 8090 3612
    2 2 nd nd Fu No.3 201 Ex 50 50 Ex Aust Equities Aust Quarterly Newsletter Quarterly December Selector In this quarterly edition we review performance and attribution. We review and share some of our macro thoughts on energy, interest rates and bank regulation. Finally we focus on health insurance specialist NIB. Photo: An ACT Fire and Rescue team. Selector Funds Management Limited ACN 102756347 AFSL 225316 Level 3, 10 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Tel 612 8090 3612 www.selectorfund.com.au About Selector We are a boutique fund manager and we have a combined experience of over 60 years. We believe in long term wealth creation and building lasting relationships with our investors. Our focus is stock selection. Our funds are high conviction, concentrated and index unaware. As a result we have low turnover and produce tax effective returns. First we identify the best business franchises with the best management teams. Then we focus on valuations. When we arrive at work each day we are reminded that; “The art of successful investment is the patient investor taking money from the impatient investor”. Our fund is open to new subscriptions. Please forward to us contact details if you would like future newsletters to be emailed to family, friends or business colleagues. Selector Funds Management Limited ACN 102756347 AFSL 225316 Level 3, 10 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia Telephone 612 8090 3612 Web www.selectorfund.com.au December 2012 Selector Australian Equities Fund Quarterly Newsletter #32 Dear Investor, This time last year the world was in turmoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis
    AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS (ALPHABETICALLY) 7-Eleven Stores Amcor A.P. MOLLER- MAERSK A/S AMEC Mining & Metals ABB Australia AMEC Oil & Gas Abbott Australasia Amgen Australia AbbVie Australia AMP Services Accolade Wines AMT Group Acrux DDS Amway of Australia Actavis Australia Anglican Retirement Villages Diocese of Sydney Actelion Pharmaceuticals ANL Container Line Adelaide Brighton APL Co Adidas Australia Apotex AECOM Australia APT Management Services (APA Group) Afton Chemical Asia Pacific Arch Wood Protection (Aust) AGC Arts Centre Melbourne AGL Energy ASC AIA Australia Ashland Hercules Water Technologies (Australia) Aimia Association of Professionals, Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia Air Liquide Australia Astellas Pharma Alcon Laboratories Australia AstraZeneca Alfa Laval Australia ATCO Australia Alinta Servco (Alinta Energy) Aurora Energy Allergan Australia AUSCOAL Services Allianz Global Assistance Auscript Australasia Allied Mills Ausenco Alpha Flight Services Aussie Farmers Direct Alphapharm Aussie Home Loans Alstom Australand Property Group Ambulance Victoria Australian Agricultural Company © March 2013 Mercer Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Quarterly Salary Review 1.5 INTRODUCTION Australian Catholic University Billabong Australian Football League Biogen Idec Australia Australian Institute of Company Directors BioMerieux Australia Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Bio-Rad Laboratories Organistaion (ANSTO) Biota Holdings Australian Pharmaceutical Industries (Priceline, Soul Pattinson Chemist) BISSELL
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Sector Responses to COVID-19 by Governments, Supervisors and Industry
    Insurance sector responses to COVID-19 by governments, supervisors and industry www.oecd.org/finance/insurance 2 July 2020 The spread of COVID-19 and the measures implemented to reduce its transmission are having (and will continue to have) significant impacts on the (re)insurance sector, as investors, as providers of insurance coverage and as businesses that will need to adapt their approaches to service delivery. This report provides an overview of the measures that governments, insurance regulators and supervisors and insurance associations and individual companies have taken to respond to COVID-19 across three main areas: (i) ensuring continuity of operations; (ii) managing solvency and liquidity risks; and (iii) providing support to policyholders that have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Summary of response measures Ensuring continuity of insurance services Insurance companies have implemented business continuity plans to maintain the delivery of essential insurance functions with a focus on digital service delivery (requiring regulatory adjustments in some jurisdictions) Insurance supervisors are closely monitoring the implementation of business continuity plans and some are providing specific guidance while taking steps to reduce the administrative burden of regulatory and supervisory functions (reporting, policy and regulation development) Managing solvency and liquidity risks Insurance supervisors are monitoring market, underwriting and liquidity risks based on existing financial and supervisory information including relevant past stress tests results. Many jurisdictions have requested additional data from insurance companies related to risks that have come to light as a result of COVID-19. Some insurance supervisors are implementing existing countercyclical supervisory tools while a few others have made some adjustments to regulatory or supervisory requirements in response to the health emergency, including flexibility in the implementation of investment limits or accounting standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 State of the Health Funds Report
    Private Health Insurance Ombudsman STATE OF THE HEALTH FUNDS REPORT 2005 (Relating to the financial year 2004-05) Report required by paragraph 82ZRC (ba) of the National Health Act 1953 i THE STATE OF THE HEALTH FUNDS – 2005 ___________________________________________________________________ FOREWORD I am pleased to present the second annual State of the Health Funds report relating to the financial year 2004/2005. The National Health Act requires the Private Health Insurance Ombudsman to publish this report after the end of each financial year, to provide comparative information on the performance and service delivery of all health funds during that financial year. The main aim of publishing the report is to give consumers some extra information to help them when making decisions about private health insurance. For existing fund members the report provides information that will assist them to compare the performance of their fund with all other health funds. For those considering taking out private health insurance it provides an indication of the services available from each fund and provides a comparison on some service and performance indicators at the fund level. In choosing the range of issues and performance information to include in this report, I have had to take account of the availability of reliable data and whether the information is reasonably comparable across funds. Much of the information included in the report is based on data collected by the Private Health Insurance Administration Council as part of their role in statistical reporting and monitoring the financial management of health funds. Some additional data has been gathered from the funds but I have sought to keep the extra administrative burden for funds to a minimal level, so as not to contribute to undue extra administration costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Organisations | June 2021 Aon Rewards Solutions Proprietary and Confidential
    Aon Rewards Solutions Proprietary and Confidential Participating organisations | June 2021 Aon Rewards Solutions Proprietary and Confidential Participating organisations 1. .au Domain Administration 44. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Limited Australasia Pty Ltd 2. [24]7.ai 45. Alfa Financial Software 3. 10X Genomics* Limited 4. 4 Pines Brewing Company 46. Alibaba Group Inc 5. 8X8 47. Alida* 6. A.F. Gason Pty Ltd* 48. Align Technology Inc. 7. A10 Networks 49. Alkane Resources Limited 8. Abacus DX 50. Allianz Australia Ltd 9. AbbVie Pty Ltd 51. Allscripts 10. Ability Options Ltd 52. Alteryx 11. Abiomed* 53. Altium Ltd 12. AC3 54. Amazon.com 55. AMEC Foster Wheeler 13. ACCELA* Australia Pty Ltd 14. Accenture Australia Ltd 56. Amgen Australia Pty Ltd 15. AccorHotels 57. AMP Services Limited 16. Acer Computer Australia Pty Ltd* 58. AMSC 17. Achieve Australia Limited* 59. Analog Devices 18. Achmea Australia 60. Anaplan 19. ACI Worldwide 61. Ancestry.com 62. Anglo American Metallurgical 20. Acquia Coal Pty Ltd 21. Actian Corporation 63. AngloGold Ashanti Australia 22. Activision Blizzard Limited* 23. Adaman Resources 64. ANZ Banking Group Ltd 24. Adcolony 65. Aon Corporation Australia 25. A-dec Australia 66. APA Group 26. ADG Engineers* 67. Apollo Endosurgery Inc. 27. Adherium Limited 68. APPEN LTD 28. Administrative Services 69. Appian* 29. Adobe Systems Inc 70. Apple and Pear Australia Ltd* 30. ADP 71. Apple Pty Ltd 31. Adtran 72. Apptio 32. Advanced Micro Devices 73. APRA AMCOS 33. Advanced Sterlization 74. Aptean Products* 75. Aptos* 34. AECOM* 76. Apttus 35. AEMO 77. Aquila Resources 36. Aeris Resources Limited 78. Arcadis 37.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement, Knowledge, Emotion: Gay Activism and HIV/AIDS in Australia to Test Or Not to Test?: HIV Antibody Testing
    3. Public Health and AIDS Activism A lot of the work of the AIDS movement in the 1980s was about the way in which HIV/AIDS and the people most affected by it were defined and the steps that needed to be taken to address AIDS. This work was done in conjunction with a range of other individuals and organisations with an interest in HIV/AIDS— most notably from within the Government and the medical profession. Kevin White and Evan Willis argue that there were three core groups competing to ‘enforce their definition of the (HIV/AIDS) situation’.1 The first of these groups was the ‘inner circle’ of doctors, scientists and medical researchers working in the HIV/AIDS sector. White and Willis describe the second as the ‘dissenting enclave’—those non-governmental groups such as the AIDS movement who worked in parallel with the inner circle, but also challenged their scientific autonomy. The third group is the ‘exoteric’ body of lay-people surrounding both the inner circle and the dissenting enclave. This ‘exoteric body’ tends to support the knowledge and values of the inner circle, and seeks to minimise the impact of the dissenting enclave. In the case of HIV/AIDS, the exoteric body was usually people with an anti-gay, pro–nuclear-family agenda—often religious organisations or conservative public commentators. Borrowing from White and Willis, the following chapters explore the relationship between these three groups in the production of knowledge about HIV/AIDS, and in defining Australia’s social and public health response to HIV/AIDS. I focus predominantly on the relationship between the medical profession (the inner circle) and the AIDS movement (the dissenting enclave), although those forming the ‘exoteric body’ (such as conservative churches and various journalists) also influenced the direction of discussion about HIV/AIDS at various times.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd's Credit Report
    AM Best September 2020 Lloyd’s Best’s Rating of Lloyd’s 2020 Lloyd’s September 2020 Lloyd’s Credit Report One Lime Street Best’s Credit Ratings: Rating Effective Date: July 15, 2020 London EC3M 7HA United Kingdom Best’s Financial Strength Rating: A Outlook: Stable Action: Affirmed Best’s Issuer Credit Rating: a+ Outlook: Stable Action: Affirmed Web: www.lloyds.com AMB#: 85202 AIIN#: AA-1122000 Assessment Descriptors Rating Unit - Members Rating Unit: Lloyd’s | AMB #: 085202 Balance Sheet Strength Very Strong AMB # Rating Unit Members Operating Performance Strong 078649 Lloyd’s Ins Co (China) Ltd Business Profile Favorable 095926 Lloyd’s Insurance Co. S.A. Enterprise Risk Management Appropriate Rating Rationale Balance Sheet Strength: Very Strong • The market has the strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalisation, as measured by Best’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). • A robust capital-setting regime, which incorporates a risk-based approach to setting member-level capital, helps protect risk- adjusted capitalisation from volatility. • Member-level capital is subject to fungibility constraints as it is held on a several rather than joint basis. • Balance sheet strength is underpinned by a strong Central Fund that is available, at the discretion of the Council of Lloyd’s, to meet the policyholder obligations of all Lloyd’s members. • An offsetting factor is the market’s significant exposure to catastrophe risk and its dependence on reinsurance to manage this risk. Operating Performance: Strong • Lloyd’s is expected to report strong operating performance across the underwriting cycle, Contents taking into account potential volatility due to its catastrophe exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Insurance Accounting—Selected Topics
    Basic Insurance Accounting – Selected Topics By Ralph S. Blanchard III, FCAS, MAAA 1 July 2008 CAS Study Note Author’s Change to This Edition This edition of the study note is the same as the June 2007 edition except for the following change to the third paragraph of section 8 on page 23: “Under GAAP all the newly purchased and identified assets and liabilities are to be valued at their “fair value”, with goodwill equal to the difference between the fair value of identified acquired assets and the fair value of identified acquired liabilities” has been changed to “Under GAAP all the newly purchased and identified assets and liabilities are to be valued at their “fair value”, with goodwill equal to the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of identified acquired assets less the fair value of identified acquired liabilities.” Basic Insurance Accounting – Selected Topics The purpose of this study note is to educate actuaries on certain basic insurance accounting topics that may be omitted in other syllabus readings. These topics include: • Loss and loss adjustment expense accounting basics • Reinsurance accounting basics • Examples of how ceded reinsurance impacts an insurers financial statements • Deposit accounting basics In addition, the following two fundamental accounting equations are provided, representing basic equations that may no longer be found in the other syllabus articles but that all actuaries should know. • Assets – Liabilities = Equity (sometimes labeled “net assets” or “surplus”) • Revenue – Expense = Income (with expense including incurred losses and underwriting expenses for an insurance company). (Note: Most accounting systems rely on some form of double-entry bookkeeping, under which all transactions result in debit and credit entries that have to balance.
    [Show full text]