DOCSLIB.ORG

Triplanes an Introduction by Hans Appel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triplanes an Introduction by Hans Appel Triplanes an introduction by Hans Appel 1 / 7 © Hans Appel 17-08-19 The "Triplane" introduction In 1843, Sir William Samuel Henson, together with John Stringfellow, already published an article in the Mechanic's Magazine in which they described an aircraft heavier than air, equipped with wings that had a wingspan of no less than 45 meters. The aircraft was powered by a steam engine. In the same magazine was also an article by Sir George Cayley that indicated that a shorter wingspan with three more compact wing pairs placed below each other would be wiser. This was probably the first time that a triplane was mentioned. John Stringfellow worked out the idea of Sir George Cayley but had no success with it. It took until 1908 until a motor-driven triplane was built. Ambroise Goupy constructed his Goupy 1 and flew it about 150 meters. Farman constructed a three-decker and flew with it over a distance of 8 kilometers on January 6, 1909. 2 / 7 © Hans Appel 17-08-19 Hans Grade constructed a small three-decker in Germany and used it to fly about 400 meters. In England, Alliot Verdon-Roe constructed some three-deckers around 1910 with which he experimented and set the A.V. Roe Company. First World War During the First World War, the company Sopwith on Thames set up a whole new project: the LC1TTr, which we now know better as the "Sopwith Triplane". This aircraft was successfully used against the German Fliegertruppe. In the professional hands of pilots from the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS), this aircraft was a fearsome and successful weapon. The Inspektion der Fliegertruppe (Idflieg) was now convinced that the English had a powerful weapon in their hands with the Sopwith three-decker and ordered Hauptmann Mühlig- Hoffmann to write a treatise on the phenomenon of triplanes on 27 July 1917. The Germans had already captured a Sopwith Triplane in Aldershof (the German test center) and Idflieg invited the German industry to come and inspect the aircraft and then design and build such an aircraft itself. It seems that many of the companies that made use of the possibility to investigate the plane were not really interested in constructing a triplane. Many of the invited companies took a successful biplane and provided it with a third wing set. This resulted in aircraft that performed poorly. Eventually, until the end of 1918, the different manufacturers would construct around 34 types of triplanes. Remarkably, only two manufacturers were able to build a suitable prototype: the Pfalz Flugzeugwerke GmbH in Speyer am Rhein and the Fokker Flugzeugwerke GmbH in Schwerin. Both companies had made a completely new design that was not based on existing aircraft. The Pfalz Dr.I In October 1917 the test phase for the Pfalz dr.I in Adlershof was completed. During the tests at Adlershof it was found that the Pfalz Dr.I equipped with a 160 hp Siemens-Halske rotary 3 / 7 © Hans Appel 17-08-19 engine delivered better performance than the Fokker especially when it came to the speed of ascent. The first 10 aircraft were sent to the front but the performance was very disappointing. In addition to structural shortcomings, a major problem was due to the unreliability of the engine. In no time, 9 out of 10 machines delivered were on the ground. There was some experimentation with other engines, but that did not help much. That is why the Pfalz Dr.I was never taken into production. Fokker Anthony Fokker was the only manufacturer who came to the front to consult with the pilots. So it happened that he was at the front in April 1917 when Manfred Freiherr von Richthofen had a nerve-racking fight with a Sopwith Triplane behind him on 20 April 1917, flying himself in an Albatros D.III. Von Richthofen explained to Fokker that the urgency to have such a type of aircraft available was very high. Fokker probably saw the captured Sopwith Triplane before it became available in Adlershof. Already on 3 June 1917, Fokker commissioned its design agency to redesign a Fokker D.VI biplane with work number 1661 and to convert it into a triplane. The lower, middle and upper wings had a gradient spanwith. The upper wing was equipped with so-called horn-balanced ailerons (ailerons, also called elephant ears). The wings were self-supporting, so no tension wires and supports (struts) were needed. Leutnant Werner Voss was the first to have the opportunity to fly the 1661 and he thought the maneuverability and ascent speed of the aircraft were excellent. He still had some technical remarks including his concern about the flutter effect of the wings. He therefore proposed to put struts between the wings. 4 / 7 © Hans Appel 17-08-19 On July 5, 1917, Fokker commissioned his design agency to design a second D.VI under work number 1697 (later 101/17). Idflieg approved the design and wanted to conduct formal tests with the aircraft type as quickly as possible. That meant three planes. One for material testing under tension and two for combat testing. It was started on July 11, 1917 under work numbers 1729 and 1730. On July 14, 1917, an order for 20 Fokker triplanes followed. Triplanes Why did people ever come up with the idea of constructing triplanes? Well, we have seen that the first ideas arose around 1843. It was therefore known in that time, around 1910, when this type of aircraft appeared that: the more wing area was present, the more lift (upward force) was produced by those wings at the same speed. And at the beginning of the last century, when it was not yet possible to make self-supporting wing constructions with sufficiently light materials that could provide sufficient lift with a limited engine power, the biplane was a good solution for this problem. But, one might ask, why don't go further and make three-, four- or even more wings on a plane? From a purely aerodynamic point of view, this is not a good idea, because constructing more wings not only increases the lift, but also increases the aerodynamic resistance. As a result, more power is required, so a larger engine that again uses more fuel. A balance must be found between performance increase and resistance increase, with the advantage of a better slenderness (wing-length / width ratio) of the wings, so that lighter wings can be constructed. Wars always give an extra boost to technological development and the "First World War" was no exception. During the "First World War" people experimented with triplanes. In the year 1917, even the largest number of such configurations were produced. Of the approximately 100 well-known triplane designs in aviation history, three-quarters were designed between 1915 and 1918. The major advantage of the triplane design is, as indicated earlier, the ratio of the size of the wing area to the total wingspan of the wing. This meant that not only heavy bombers within, for that time, manageable construction limits could be designed, but gave to fighter aircraft, by loading the wings less and a shorter wingspan, more maneuverability and lift. Now, triplanes also have intrinsic disadvantages, and moreover, the increased ratio between wing surface and wingspan is not just a gain. The third wing and the extra lines and struts that were needed to give the structure sufficient rigidity were a considerable disadvantage. Furthermore, useful effect was lost due to disruption of the aerodynamic air flow between the wings. This is due to the fact that the wings of a three-decker are closer together. 5 / 7 © Hans Appel 17-08-19 A triplane did not provide extra robustness, many triplanes were known to be less robust than their biplane colleagues. And with regard to maintenance: due to the complexity of rigging and adjusting the extra tension wires and struts, the complexity increased considerably. The Fokker and Sopwith single seat triplanes were less bothered because they were not adapted biplanes but were designed from the beginning as triplanes. That, incidentally, is something that strikes the most about "First World War" triplanes: only a few were originally designed as such. As we have seen, most existing biplane designs were added with an additional wing. Sometimes the upper and lower biplane wings were set further apart and another wing was placed between them. For others, the wings were completely redesigned, which meant that substantial changes were needed to the hull and the rigging. The reason for popularity around the triplane was the success of the English Sopwith triplane- fighter. After a brief successful combat test in June 1916, a number were ordered by the Royal Flying Corps (RFC). But for an inexplicable reason, these were delivered to the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) and made available to the operational squadrons in April 1917. In fact, the Sopwith triplane was a conversion of the Sopwith "Pup" which was replaced by an 80 hp standard engine and a 130 hp engine. The German "Luftstreitkräfte / Idflieg" were so impressed with the performance of this English aircraft that they asked Fokker to develop a triplane. The advantage of the Fokker designers was that they could develop a triplane from the start. Which allowed them to assume the maximum aerodynamic and mechanical-structural benefits of the three-wing principle. The first Fokker triplanes appeared at the front in August 1917 and were immediately a success in the hands of "aces" such as Richthofen, Voss and Gontermann. When we consider the number of production planes from Fokker (320), Sopwith (150) and Caproni (24) and add them together the coun is 494.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MS – 204 Charles Lewis Aviation Collection
    MS – 204 Charles Lewis Aviation Collection Wright State University Special Collections and Archives Container Listing Sub-collection A: Airplanes Series 1: Evolution of the Airplane Box File Description 1 1 Evolution of Aeroplane I 2 Evolution of Aeroplane II 3 Evolution of Aeroplane III 4 Evolution of Aeroplane IV 5 Evolution of Aeroplane V 6 Evolution of Aeroplane VI 7 Evolution of Aeroplane VII 8 Missing Series 2: Pre-1914 Airplanes Sub-series 1: Drawings 9 Aeroplanes 10 The Aerial Postman – Auckland, New Zealand 11 Aeroplane and Storm 12 Airliner of the Future Sub-series 2: Planes and Pilots 13 Wright Aeroplane at LeMans 14 Wright Aeroplane at Rheims 15 Wilbur Wright at the Controls 16 Wright Aeroplane in Flight 17 Missing 18 Farman Airplane 19 Farman Airplane 20 Antoinette Aeroplane 21 Bleriot and His Monoplane 22 Bleriot Crossing the Channel 23 Bleriot Airplane 24 Cody, Deperdussin, and Hanriot Planes 25 Valentine’s Aeroplane 26 Missing 27 Valentine and His Aeroplane 28 Valentine and His Aeroplane 29 Caudron Biplane 30 BE Biplane 31 Latham Monoplane at Sangette Series 3: World War I Sub-series 1: Aerial Combat (Drawings) Box File Description 1 31a Moraine-Saulnier 31b 94th Aero Squadron – Nieuport 28 – 2nd Lt. Alan F. Winslow 31c Fraser Pigeon 31d Nieuports – Various Models – Probably at Issoudoun, France – Training 31e 94th Aero Squadron – Nieuport – Lt. Douglas Campbell 31f Nieuport 27 - Servicing 31g Nieuport 17 After Hit by Anti-Aircraft 31h 95th Aero Squadron – Nieuport 28 – Raoul Lufbery 32 Duel in the Air 33 Allied Aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society
    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
    [Show full text]
  • Aebo Modeuer Aircraft Described
    AEBO MODEUER AIRCRAFT DESCRIBED Number 106 Described & drawn by P. L. G RAY N 5430 seen at right and below left, was one of a batch of 75, numbered from N 5420 to il 5494, built bt the Sopwith Aviation Co. Ltd. This machine w* transferred to the R.f.C. preumably for evaluation or compara- tive tests, Below right, a Number I R.l{.4.S. Squadron lin€-up. l{ote absence of fuselage roqndels, The aircraft with white fin is that of the Flight Commander, H. V. Rowl€y. t.w.M, Fhoto gr o9h Q.679 4 Tnn SopwIrH TRIrLANE was evolvedin the Sopwith Squadronsand did not equip R.F.C. units. First Squadron design office during the early months of 1916 in an to receive the type was No. I (Naval) Sqdn. which, endeavourto combine the maximum of llft and visibility having spent several weeks working up on the type, with optimum manouevreability.Although of uncon- began their first operationalsorties during the opening ventional configuration, it followed orthodox con- daysof April l9l7 at the Battleof Arras.No. 8,9 and l0 structional methods and differed little, basically, from (Naval) Sqdns, were likewise equipped and also began the Pup which preceededit. The fuselage w€rsa box- offensivepatrols during April 1917. girder of spruce longerons and spacers, braced in all It wasthis month of April l9l7 that cameto be known bays with piano wire. An acute curve of the longerons as "Bloody April" by the flying services due to thc into the sternpost (in plan view), was obtained by disastrous casualties they suffered-mainly by the B.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Wings of War - Flight of the Giants
    Flight of the Giants Rulebook GAME MATERIALS XA 1/13 FG CAPRONI CA.3 MANEUVER CARDS (6 DECKS: XA, XA, XB, XC, XD, XD) (78) XA 34 4 ZEPPELIN STAAKEN R.VI XD 25 3 3A SQUADRIGLIA RIESENFLIEGER-ABTEILUNG 501 Te n. Casimiro Buttini, Hptm Arthur Sc hoeller Serg. Luigi Remitti 1/8 FG 1/8 FG 1/6 FG AIRPLANE CARDS (8) 1/12 FG TARGET CARDS (6) BOMB CARDS (12) ZEPPELIN STAAKEN R.VI CAPRONI CA.3 AIRPLANE MANAGEMENT CARDS (8) B 1/44 FG MARKERS, TOKENS, AND COUNTERS (85) DAMAGE CARDS (1 DECK: B) (44) AIRPLANE CONSOLES (6) 2 WINGS OF WAR - FLIGHT OF THE GIANTS Flight of the Giants is an expansion set for the WWI Wings of During World War I, several nations developed giant planes that War game. It adds to the game the large, multi-engine planes could bring heavy loads of bombs far behind enemy lines. Sadly, that brought terror at a range of hundreds of kilometers of cities and civilians became targets too, and 23 years before the distance, with detailed rules to handle them and improved rules Battle of Britain of 1940, several raids made with multi-engine for bombing. planes hit London and its population. However, the giants of the Th e fi rst bombing from an airplane happened during the Italo- sky served their armies in several other roles too. Turkish War: Italian Tenente Giulio Gavotti dropped four Cipelli To use this set, you must own any Wings of War boxed set that bombs from his Etrich Taube over Ottoman troops near Ain- includes the basic game rules and some single-engine planes, Zara on November 1, 1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Wings of War FAQ V1.0 5/5/2005 Here Are Some of the Most Common
    have two evenly-matched sides, so it should probably say "2 or 4" players." A) The design team often played with three players: one player flying two planes, the other two in a team with one plane each. We never tried three on three: each player flying one plane each. As a non-historical scenario that's possible, but inventing it is left to the imagination of the players. Q) Which is the minimum age to play Wings of War? A) The box indicates ages 10+, but 8-year-old kids Wings of War FAQ v1.0 5/5/2005 can play successfully with the basic rules. Six-year- old kids can play with some help in handling the Here are some of the most common questions about maneuvers available each turn. On some online forum the game, its components, rules, and the historical we read about even younger players. The age listed background of the airplanes depicted. on the box refers to the age of someone that could read the rules by themselves and play the game on GENERAL QUESTIONS their own. Q) Is Watch Your Back! an expansion set for GAME COMPONENTS Famous Aces? Q) How much is the game language-dependent? A) No, at the moment there are no "expansions" for Wings of War. There are just two independent sets, A) All the components are language independent, Famous Aces and Watch Your Back! Either one of except for the rulebook. You can find an Italian them can be played with 2-4 players. Watch Your edition by Nexus Editrice, an English edition by Back! isn't an expansion since it can be played on its Fantasy Flight Games, a German edition by Mad own without owning Famous Aces.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2016 Issue No 128
    The Oily Rag! Photo Peter Nicholson Tony Newberry surrounded by some of the locos he has built at a celebration of his achievements at Coate Water Miniature Railwa y Peter Nicholson and Joshua Brinsford report WinterWinter 2016 Issue No 128 TheThe Taunton Model Engineers’ magazinemagazine 1 ContentsContents 3. From the Editor 3. Chairman’s Notes 5. News from Creech 7. Report from Vivary Park 9. Steam powered aircraf t By William Pickering Do you believe this? 14. Robin No. 6 By Tim Griffiths Would you like to be involved with rebuilding this loco? 16. “On the footplate” The art of stopping By Ray Rolt Ray brings his experiences on the S&DR to a halt. 20. Tony Newberry honoured at Coate Miniature Railway A report by Peter Nicholson and Joshua Brinsfo rd 23. “Tich 2.5” By John Pickering A new take on a classic design. 25. Little puffers way By Tim Griffiths Tim’s early days in South London 28. Of ships and things By Fireman M.N. retired Clean clothes and black smoke 2 From the Editor Tony Newberry is probably our most prolific model engineer. On the weekend of the 13th and 14th August an event was held at the North Wilts Model Engineering Society’s Coate Water Miniature Railway to celebrate his achievements. Peter Nicholson and Joshua Brinsford report on this event. This issue has nostalgia with pieces from Tim Griffiths and fireman MN retd. Ray Rolt complet es his series on driving on the S&DR. appropriately with the “art of stopping”. To fill the pages I was able to call on a source from beyond the grave.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome S. Fanciulli Collection History of Aviation Collection
    Jerome S. Fanciulli Collection History of Aviation Collection Provenance Jerome S. Fanciulli was born in New York City, January 12, 1988. He was the son of Professor Francesco and Amanda Fanciulli. He was educated at de Witt Clinton High School in New York City. He attended St. Louis University, St. Louis, 1903-04 and Stevens Institute, Hoboken, N.J., 1904-05. He married Marian Callaghan in November, 1909. On January 12, 1986 he died in Winchester Hospital in Winchester, Virginia. Mr. Fanciulli worked for the Washington Post and then joined the Associated Press where his assignments were on the Capitol staff of the Associated Press. He became the AP’s aviation specialist. Mr. Fanciulli was a charter member of the National Press Club and a founding member of the Aero Club of Washington, D.C. In November 19098, Mr. Fanciulli joined Glenn H. Curtiss’ company. He was Vice President and General Manger of the Curtiss Exhibition Company. Among his many varied duties Mr. Fanciulli established schools of aviation and directed the demonstration and sale of Curtiss aeroplanes in the United States and Europe. He promoted or conducted some of the largest air meets in the United States prior to 1913. He collaborated with the United States Army and the United States Navy in developing aeroplane specifications. Mr. Fanciulli wrote magazine articles, employed and directed aviators obtaining contracts for them. Mr. Fanciulli sold the United States Navy its first biplane and the United States Army its second biplane. He also sold czarist Russia its first plane for their Navy. Mr. Fanciulli left the Glenn H.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ancient Air – John Stringfellow
    AnAirlife CLASSIC AN ANCIENT AIR The invention all admired and each how he To be the inventor missed; so easy it seemed Once found, which yet unfound Most would have thought impossible. Milton BIOGRAPHY (JL THE VICTORIAN AERONAUTICAL HARALD PEMRUbfc AnAirlife CLASSIC Copyright © 1988 Harald Penrose First published in the UK in 1988 by Airlife Publishing Ltd This edition published 2000 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 1840371846 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Printed in England by St Edmundsbury Press Ltd, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk Airlife Publishing Ltd 101 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SYS 9EB, England E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.airlifebooks.com Contents Acknowledgements Chronology Foreword 9 Chapter 1 Age of Industrial Development 17 Chapter 2 Days of the Reform Bill 23 Chapters Scheming a Powered Flyer 31 Chapter 4 Publicity Manoeuvring 55 Chapter 5 Trial and Tribulation 63 Chapter 6 Epochal Independent Success 70 Chapter 7 Continuing Development 76 Chapter 8 The Great Exhibition 94 Chapter 9 A Valued Friendship 122 Chapter 10 A Wonderful Old Gentleman 135 Chapter 11 His Son Continues the Quest 154 Chapter 12 An End and a Beginning 168 Index 179 Acknowledgements Introducing some of the many who assisted The route to a biography is long and tortuous and requires the help of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Sopwith Triplane Instruction Booklet
    SOPWITH TRIPLANE VMC Instruction Booklet - Sopwith Triplane JAN19.indd 1 19/01/2019 12:21 2 vintagemodelcompany.com VMC Instruction Booklet - Sopwith Triplane JAN19.indd 2 19/01/2019 12:21 THE SOPWITH TRIPLANE – A MULTI-WINGED MARVEL Sopwith’s Chief Engineer, Herbert Smith, Most Triplanes served with the Royal Naval Air developed the Triplane on the orders of owner Service (RNAS) where they proved to be excellent Thomas Sopwith as a private enterprise for a new fighting machines, although their service was short scout (fighter) aircraft, with superior rates of climb, lived. They were difficult to maintain in the field, roll, and better all-round visibility than current and the pace of development at the time saw designs. Smith believed that three staggered, them overtaken quickly by better designs such as narrow chord wings, set wide apart, each with its Sopwith’s own Camel and the SE5A. Such was the own set of ailerons would fit the bill. The prototype German admiration for the performance of the flew in May 1916 piloted by Sopwith test pilot basic design, that Anthony Fokker studied a crashed Harry Hawker (later to form the Hawker Aircraft example and went on to use it as inspiration for what Company of Hurricane fame). Astonishingly for a became the Fokker DR1 – the triplane flown by the maiden test flight, Hawker successfully looped the infamous ‘Red Baron’, Manfred Von Richthofen. aircraft three times. Subsequent flights proved that Overall nearly 150 aircraft were built. Few original Smith was right and that the ‘Tripehound’ as many aircraft survive, none in airworthy condition, pilots came to know the aircraft, had far better although a number of reproduction aircraft can rates of climb, manoeuvrability and visibility than be seen, the most famous being ‘Dixie II’ at the any other domestic or enemy aircraft of the day Shuttleworth Collection based at the Old Warden (although this was tempered by slower dives than Aerodrome, Bedfordshire, England.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to The
    Guide to the St. Martin WWI Photographic Negative Collection 1914-1918 7.2 linear feet Accession Number: 66-98 Collection Number: FW66-98 Arranged by Jack McCracken, Ken Rice, and Cam McGill Described by Paul A. Oelkrug July 2004 Citation: The St. Martin WWI Photographic Negative Collection, FW66-98, Box number, Photograph number, History of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Department McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Revised 8/20/04 Table of Contents Additional Sources ...................................................................................................... 3 Series Description ....................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ...................................................................................................... 4 Provenance Statement ................................................................................................. 4 Literary Rights Statement ........................................................................................... 4 Note to the Researcher ................................................................................................ 4 Container list ............................................................................................................... 5 2 Additional Sources Ed Ferko World War I Collection, George Williams WWI Aviation Archives, The History of Aviation Collection,
    [Show full text]
  • Sns College of Technology
    SNS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY (An Autonomous Institution) COIMBATORE-35 DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING BIPLANE A biplane is a fixed-wing aircraft with two main wings. The first powered heavier-thanair aircraft, the Wright brothers‟ Wright Flyer, used a biplane design, as did most airplanes in the early years of aviation. While a biplane wing structure has a structural disadvantage, it produces more drag than a similar monoplane wing. Improved structural techniques and materials, as first pioneered by Hugo Junkers in 1915, and the need for greater speed, made the biplane configuration obsolete for most purposes by the late 1930s. In a biplane aircraft, two wings are placed one above the other. Both provide a portion of the lift; although they are not able to produce twice as much lift as a single wing of similar planform. This is because a wing's effect is imposed on a circular cylinder of air as the craft moves forward. In the case of the biplane, the upper and the lower are working on nearly the same portion of the atmosphere. In a wing of aspect ratio 6, and a wing separation distance of one chord length, the biplane configuration can produce about 20 percent more lift than a single wing of the same planform. In the biplane configuration, the lower wing is often attached to the fuselage, while the upper wing is raised above, although other combinations have occurred. Almost all biplanes also have a third horizontal surface, the tailplane, to control the pitch, or angle of attack of the aircraft (although there have been a few exceptions).
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Airplane an American Invention?
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 13; November2014 Was the Airplane an American Invention? Susan Kelly Archer, Ed.D. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ph.D. in Aviation Program, College of Aviation 600 South Clyde Morris Blvd. Daytona Beach, FL 32224 Abstract The airplane was not essentially an American invention; it was a World invention. One cannot attribute the invention of the airplane solely to the Wright brothers. The Wright brothers were voracious readers of a variety of articles written by or about other great names in aviation development, among them Otto Lillienthal, Octave Chanute, Sir George Cayley, and John Stringfellow. Lillienthal, Cayley, and Stringfellow were European and Chanute was born in France. Cayley’s work in aeronautics, Lillienthal’s gliders, Stringfellow’s engine, and Chanute’s coordination of aviation development literature provided a solid foundation for the historic moment in December 1903 at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Keywords:aviation, invention, Wright brothers, history Invention of the Airplane The airplane was not essentially an American invention; it was a World invention. One cannot attribute the invention of the airplane solely to the Wright brothers. Their success at powered flight was certainly a crossroads event in the development of aviation, but it was part of an historical progression rather than a singular event. The Kitty Hawk flight was memorable and remarkable, but it cannot be described in the context of aviation development as solely American. Multiple sources recognized that the Wright brothers were voracious readers of a variety of articles written by or about other great names in aviation development (Gibbs-Smith, 1970; Shipman, 1998; Whelan, 2000).
    [Show full text]