DOCSLIB.ORG

Radial Velocity'' Lindegren, Lennart; Dravins, Dainis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radial Velocity'' Lindegren, Lennart; Dravins, Dainis The fundamental definition of "radial velocity'' Lindegren, Lennart; Dravins, Dainis Published in: Astronomy & Astrophysics DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030181 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lindegren, L., & Dravins, D. (2003). The fundamental definition of "radial velocity''. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 401(3), 1185-1201. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030181 Total number of authors: 2 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 A&A 401, 1185–1201 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030181 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics The fundamental definition of “radial velocity” Lennart Lindegren and Dainis Dravins Lund Observatory, Box 43, 22100 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 4 September 2002 / Accepted 31 January 2003 Abstract. Accuracy levels of metres per second require the fundamental concept of “radial velocity” for stars and other distant objects to be examined, both as a physical velocity, and as measured by spectroscopic and astrometric techniques. Already in a classical (non-relativistic) framework the line-of-sight velocity component is an ambiguous concept, depending on whether, e.g., the time of light emission (at the object) or that of light detection (by the observer) is used for recording the time coordi- nate. Relativistic velocity effects and spectroscopic measurements made inside gravitational fields add further complications, causing wavelength shifts to depend, e.g., on the transverse velocity of the object and the gravitational potential at the source. 1 Aiming at definitions that are unambiguous at accuracy levels of 1 m s− , we analyse different concepts of radial velocity and their interrelations. At this accuracy level, a strict separation must be made between the purely geometric concepts on one hand, and the spectroscopic measurement on the other. Among the geometric concepts we define kinematic radial velocity,which corresponds most closely to the “textbook definition” of radial velocity as the line-of-sight component of space velocity; and astrometric radial velocity, which can be derived from astrometric observations. Consistent with these definitions, we propose strict definitions also of the complementary kinematic and astrometric quantities, namely transverse velocity and proper mo- tion. The kinematic and astrometric radial velocities depend on the chosen spacetime metric, and are accurately related by simple coordinate transformations. On the other hand, the observational quantity that should result from accurate spectroscopic measurements is the barycentric radial-velocity measure. This is independent of the metric, and to first order equals the line-of- sight velocity. However, it is not a physical velocity, and cannot be accurately transformed to a kinematic or astrometric radial velocity without additional assumptions and data in modelling the process of light emission from the source, the transmission of the signal through space, and its recording by the observer. For historic and practical reasons, the spectroscopic radial-velocity measure is expressed in velocity units as czB,wherec is the speed of light and zB is the observed relative wavelength shift reduced to the solar-system barycentre, at an epoch equal to the barycentric time of light arrival. The barycentric radial-velocity measure and the astrometric radial velocity are defined by recent resolutions adopted by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the motives and consequences of which are explained in this paper. Key words. techniques: radial velocities – techniques: spectroscopic – astrometry – reference systems – stars: kinematics – methods: data analysis 1. The need for stringent definitions their background, the need for such definitions, and to elabo- rate on their consequences for future work. Thus, the paper is Radial velocity is an omnipresent concept in astronomy, and not about the detailed interpretation of observed spectral-line a quantity whose precision of determination has improved displacements in terms of radial motion, nor about the actual significantly in recent years. Its meaning is generally under- techniques for making such measurements; rather, it is the def- stood as the object’s motion along the line of sight, a quantity inition of “radial velocity” itself, as a geometric and spectro- normally deduced from observed spectral-line displacements, scopic concept, that is discussed. interpreted as Doppler shifts. However, despite its ubiquity, The need for a strict definition has become urgent in re- there has not existed any physically stringent definition of “ra- cent years as a consequence of important developments in the dial velocity” with an accuracy to match currently attainable techniques for measuring stellar radial velocities, as well as the measuring precisions. Two first such definitions – one for the improved understanding of the many effects that complicate result of spectroscopic observations, and one for the geomet- their interpretation. We note in particular the following circum- ric (astrometric) concept of radial velocity – were adopted at stances: the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), held in 2000. The purpose of this paper is to explain Precision and accuracy of spectroscopic measurements: spectroscopic measurement precisions are now reaching (and Send offprint requests to: L. Lindegren, surpassing) levels of metres per second. In some applications, e-mail: [email protected] such as the search for (short-period) extrasolar planets or stellar 1186 Lennart Lindegren and Dainis Dravins: The fundamental definition of “radial velocity” oscillations, it may be sufficient to obtain differential measure- The role of standard stars: practical radial-velocity mea- ments of wavelength shifts, in which case internal precision is surements have traditionally relied on the use of standard stars adequate and there is no need for an accurate definition of the to define the zero point of the velocity scale. While these have 1 zero point. However, other applications might require the com- aimed at accuracies of the order 100 m s− , it has in reality bination of data from different observatories, recorded over ex- been difficult to achieve consistency even at this level due to tended periods of time, and thus the use of a common reference poorly understood systematic differences depending on spec- point. Examples could be the study of long-term variations due tral type, stellar rotation, instrumental resolution, correlation to stellar activity cycles and searches for long-period stellar masks used, and so on. Standard stars will probably continue to companions. Such applications call for data that are not only play a role as a practical way of eliminating, to first order, such precise, but also accurate, i.e., referring to some “absolute” differences in radial-velocity surveys aiming at moderate ac- scale of measurements. However, the transfer of high-precision curacy. However, their relation to high-accuracy measurements measurements to absolute values was previously not possible, needs to be clearly defined. partly because there has been no agreement on how to make Gravitational redshifts: the gravitational potential at the such a transfer, or even on which physical quantity to transfer. stellar surface causes all escaping photons to be redshifted by an amount that varies from 30 m s 1 for supergiants, In the past, a classical accuracy achieved for measuring ∼ − 1 30 km s 1 for white dwarfs, and much greater values for neu- stellar radial velocities has been perhaps 1 km s− ,atwhich ∼ − level most of these issues did not arise, or could be solved tron stars and other compact objects. Even for a given star, the by the simple use of “standard stars”. With current methods precise shift varies depending on the height at which the spec- and instrumentation, the accuracy by which measured stel- tral lines are formed. The observed shift also depends on the lar wavelengths can be related to absolute numbers is largely gravitational potential at the observer, and therefore on the ob- set by the laboratory sources used for spectrometer calibra- server’s distance from the Sun. tion (lines from iodine cells, lasers, etc.). An accuracy level Astrometric determination of radial motion: current and 1 expected advances in astrometry enable the accurate deter- of about 10 m s− now seems reachable. Since any fundamen- tal definition should be at least some order of magnitude better mination of stellar radial motions without using spectroscopy than current performance, the accuracy goal for the definition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dismantling Hubble's Legacy?
    **Volume Title** ASP Conference Series, Vol. **Volume Number** **Author** c **Copyright Year** Astronomical Society of the Pacific Dismantling Hubble’s Legacy? Michael J. Waya,b aNASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, 10029 USA bDepartment of Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Abstract. Edwin Hubble is famous for a number of discoveries that are well known to amateur and professional astronomers, students and the general public. The origins of these discoveries are examined and it is demonstrated that, in each case, a great deal of supporting evidence was already in place. In some cases the discoveries had either already been made, or competing versions were not adopted for complex scientific and sociological reasons. 1. Introduction Edwin Hubble is considered one of the titans of early 20th century observational cos- mology. He is credited in most textbooks1 and the popular literature for a series of important discoveries made between 1920 and 1930: • The confirmation of the Island Universe hypothesis • The classification of extragalactic nebulae • The discovery of a linear relationship between distance and velocity for extra- galactic nebulae, providing the first evidence for the expanding universe • The brightness profile of galaxies The discoveries above are well-known to the astronomy community and most as- tronomers would associate them solely with Edwin Hubble; yet this is a gross over- simplification. Astronomers and historians are beginning to revise that standard story and bring a more nuanced version to the public’s attention. This paper is adding to this burgeoning reappraisal.2 As a (small) counter-narrative, William Hoyt (1980, p. 411), in his biographical memoir of V.
    [Show full text]
  • A Metallicity Snapshot of the Small Magellanic Cloud from Spectra of RR Lyrae Stars
    A Metallicity Snapshot of the Small Magellanic Cloud from Spectra of RR Lyrae Stars Anders Nyholm Faculty of Engineering, LTH Lund University and Lund Observatory Lund University 2013-EXA72 Degree project of 30 higher education credits (for a degree of Master) January 2013 Lund Observatory Box 43 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden A Metallicity Snapshot of the Small Magellanic Cloud from Spectra of RR Lyrae Stars Anders Nyholm Examensarbete f¨oravl¨aggande av civilingenj¨orsexamen i teknisk fysik. Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering Physics. Supervisor: Dr Thomas Bensby Lund Observatory Lund University Examiner: Professor Ragnar Bengtsson Division of Mathematical Physics Faculty of Engineering, LTH Lund University Abstract Using spectra of RR Lyrae stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) a metal- licity snapshot from an early epoch in the history of the SMC could possibly be obtained. The SMC, one of our closest neighbours in the Local Group of galaxies, o↵ers the opportunity to study another galaxy close-up. The history of the SMC can be traced using the chemical characteristics of its di↵erent generations of stars. The early history of the SMC is debated, and it would be desirable to determine a metallicity distribution function (MDF) of such old ( 1010 years) stars as the RR Lyrae variables in the SMC. „ This work uses low resolution RR Lyrae spectra extracted from images obtained in September 2005 with the IMACS spectrograph and camera (in multislit mode) on the 6.5 m Magellan I telescope in Chile. By measuring the equivalent widths of the Balmer γ and δ lines from hydrogen and the Ca II K line from calcium and using Andrew Layden’s method, the metallicity of the SMC RR Lyrae stars could be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasars Can Be Used to Verify the Parallax Zero-Point of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution Daniel Michalik and Lennart Lindegren
    A&A 586, A26 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527444 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Quasars can be used to verify the parallax zero-point of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution Daniel Michalik and Lennart Lindegren Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Box 43, 22100 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [daniel.michalik;lennart]@astro.lu.se Received 24 September 2015 / Accepted 25 October 2015 ABSTRACT Context. The Gaia project will determine positions, proper motions, and parallaxes for more than one billion stars in our Galaxy. It is known that Gaia’s two telescopes are affected by a small but significant variation of the basic angle between them. Unless this variation is taken into account during data processing, e.g. using on-board metrology, it causes systematic errors in the astrometric parameters, in particular a shift in the parallax zero-point. Previously, we suggested an early reduction of Gaia data for the subset of Tycho-2 stars (Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution; TGAS). Aims. We investigate whether quasars can be used to independently verify the parallax zero-point in early data reductions. This is not trivially possible as the observation interval is too short to disentangle parallax and proper motion for the quasar subset. Methods. We repeat TGAS simulations but additionally include simulated Gaia observations of quasars from ground-based surveys. All observations are simulated with basic angle variations. To obtain a full astrometric solution for the quasars in TGAS we explore the use of prior information for their proper motions. Results. It is possible to determine the parallax zero-point for the quasars with a few µas uncertainty, and it agrees to a similar precision with the zero-point for the Tycho-2 stars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Meetings 1957 to 1967
    2015.12.04 11 pages with 3 figures 2017.08.03: Links to dropbox changed to my website Accepted for publication in the proceedings of the colloquium in Kiel of the Working Group History of Astronomy of the Astronomische Gesellschaft in September 2015: Nuncius Hamburgensis, Band 38 (2016) The Baltic Meetings 1957 to 1967 Erik Høg - Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen - [email protected] Abstract: The Baltic meetings of astronomers from Northern Germany and Scandinavia began in 1957 and gathered up to 70 participants. Reports of the presentations are available from all meetings, providing an overview of the interests of astronomers in this part of the world 50 years ago. Most interesting to see for a young astronomer in our days, I think, is that a large part of the time was about astrometry. This focus on astrometry was the basis for the scientific knowhow which made the idea of space astrometry realistic, resulting in the approval by ESA of the first astrometry satellite Hipparcos in 1980 which brought a revolution of high•precision astrometry of positions, motions and distances of stars. The correspondence with ten observatories shows that only one of them has any archive of letters at all from the 1950s, that is in Copenhagen where about 7000 letters on scientific and administrative matters are extant. Figure 1 Otto Heckmann. – Photo: Wilhelm Dieckvoss 1 1 Introduction There were meetings in the 1950•60s, then sometimes called Baltic Meetings, in Aarhus, Copenhagen, Lund, Hamburg, and Göttingen, five in total between 1957 and 1967. They resulted from the initiative of professor Otto Heckmann (1901•83) (director of the Hamburg•Bergedorf observatory 1942•62, and later president of the Astronomische Gesellschaft, president of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and the first director general of ESO).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1906.09827V5 [Astro-Ph.IM] 14 May 2020 Tified As Quasars
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 36161˙v5 c ESO 2020 May 15, 2020 The Gaia reference frame for bright sources examined using VLBI observations of radio stars Lennart Lindegren Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Box 43, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Context. Positions and proper motions of Gaia sources are expressed in a reference frame that ideally should be non-rotating relative to distant extragalactic objects, coincident with the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS), and consistent across all magni- tudes. For sources fainter than 16th magnitude, this is achieved through Gaia’s direct observations of quasars. At brighter magnitudes, it is difficult to validate the quality of the reference frame because comparison data are scarce. Aims. The aim of this paper is to examine the use of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of radio stars to determine the spin and orientation of the bright reference frame of current and future Gaia data releases. Methods. Simultaneous estimation of the six spin and orientation parameters makes optimal use of VLBI data and makes it possible to include even single-epoch VLBI observations in the solution. The method is applied to Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) using published VLBI data for 41 radio stars. Results. The VLBI data for the best-fitting 26 sources indicate that the bright reference frame of Gaia DR2 rotates relative to the faint quasars at a rate of about 0.1 mas yr−1, which is significant at the 2σ level. This supports a similar conclusion based on a comparison with stellar positions in the Hipparcos frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrometric Radial Velocities for Nearby Stars Lennart Lindegren and Dainis Dravins
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. main_LE ©ESO 2021 June 30, 2021 Astrometric radial velocities for nearby stars Lennart Lindegren and Dainis Dravins Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Box 43, 22100 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received XXX YY, 2021; accepted ZZZ WW, 2021 ABSTRACT Context. Under certain conditions, stellar radial velocities can be determined from astrometry, without any use of spectroscopy. This enables us to identify phenomena, other than the Doppler effect, that are displacing spectral lines. Aims. The change of stellar proper motions over time (perspective acceleration) is used to determine radial velocities from accurate astrometric data, which are now available from the Gaia and Hipparcos missions. Methods. Positions and proper motions at the epoch of Hipparcos are compared with values propagated back from the epoch of the Gaia Early Data Release 3. This propagation depends on the radial velocity, which obtains its value from an optimal fit assuming uniform space motion relative to the solar system barycentre. Results. For 930 nearby stars we obtain astrometric radial velocities with formal uncertainties better than 100 km s−1; for 55 stars the uncertainty is below 10 km s−1, and for seven it is below 1 km s−1. Most stars that are not components of double or multiple systems show good agreement with available spectroscopic radial velocities. Conclusions. Astrometry offers geometric methods to determine stellar radial velocity, irrespective of complexities in stellar spectra. This enables us to segregate wavelength displacements caused by the radial motion of the stellar centre-of-mass from those induced by other effects, such as gravitational redshifts in white dwarfs.
    [Show full text]
  • Quanteye: Quantum Optics Instrumentation for Astronomy
    OWL Instrument Concept Study QUANTUM OPTICS INSTRUMENTATION FOR ASTRONOMY 1 2 D. Dravins , C. Barbieri , 3 1 2 V. Da Deppo , D. Faria , S. Fornasier , 4 1 3 1 R. A. E. Fosbury , L. Lindegren , G. Naletto , R. Nilsson , 3 2 1 5 T. Occhipinti , F. Tamburini , H. Uthas , L. Zampieri (1) Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden (2) Department of Astronomy, University of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 2, IT-35122 Padova, Italy (3) Dept. of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo, 6/B, IT-35131 Padova, Italy (4) Space Telescope-European Coordinating Facility & European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, DE-85748 Garching bei München, Germany (5) INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, IT-35122 Padova, Italy OWL-CSR-ESO-00000-0162 — Version 1.0, October 2005 - 1 - Quantum Optics Instrumentation for Astronomy D. Dravins, C. Barbieri V. Da Deppo, D. Faria, S. Fornasier R. A. E. Fosbury, L. Lindegren, G. Naletto, R. Nilsson T. Occhipinti, F. Tamburini, H. Uthas, L. Zampieri OWL Instrument Concept Study, OWL-CSR-ESO-00000-0162 Version 1.0 — October 2005 - 2 - [ Blank page ] - 3 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………...… 3 Scope, Participants, and Schedule ………………………………………….....……...… 7 Executive Summary ………………………………………………...……………...……...… 9 1. The Road to Quantum Astronomy ………………………………………………...… 13 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Aims of the Study 1.3. High Time-Resolution Astrophysics 1.4. Which Timescales are Observationally Accessible? 1.5. Astrophysics on Subsecond Scales 1.6. Nanoseconds and Quantum Optics 1.7. Beyond Imaging, Photometry, and Spectroscopy 1.8. One-Photon Experiments 1.9. Two- and Multi-Photon Properties of Light 1.10.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro2020 Science White Paper All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry
    Astro2020 Science White Paper All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry Thematic Areas: ☒ Planetary Systems ☒ Star and Planet Formation ☒ Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects ☒ Cosmology and Fundamental Physics ☒ Stars and Stellar Evolution, ☒ Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments ☒ Galaxy Evolution ☒ Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Author: Name: Barbara McArthur Institution: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1205 Email: [email protected] Phone: (512)471-3411 Co-authors: (names and institutions) David Hobbs, Lund Observatory, Box 43, 22100, Lund Sweden Erik Høg, Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Valeri Makarov, US Naval Observatory, Washington DC, USA Alessandro Sozzetti, INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino Torinese, Italy Anthony Brown, Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, the Netherlands Alberto Krone Martins, CENTRA/SIM Faculty of Science, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal Jennifer Lynn Bartlett, U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC 20392 John Tomsick, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 Mike Shao, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109 Fritz Benedict, McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin Tx 78712 Eduardo Bendek, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035 Celine Boehm, Physics, University of Sidney, Sydney, Australia Charlie Conroy, Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 Johan Peter Uldall Fynbo, Cosmic Dawn Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, Lyngbyvej 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark Oleg Gnedin, Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4810 Lynne Hillenbrand, Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Lennart Lindegren, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Box 43, 22100 Lund, Sweden David R.
    [Show full text]