DOCSLIB.ORG

King John – Act Three, Scene One BLANCHE Upon Thy Wedding-Day?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

King John – Act Three, Scene One BLANCHE Upon thy wedding-day? Against the blood that thou hast married? What, shall our feast be kept with slaughter'd men? Shall braying trumpets and loud churlish drums, Clamours of hell, be measures to our pomp? O husband, hear me! ay, alack, how new Is husband in my mouth! even for that name, Which till this time my tongue did ne'er pronounce, Upon my knee I beg, go not to arms Against mine uncle. The sun's o'ercast with blood: fair day, adieu! Which is the side that I must go withal? I am with both: each army hath a hand; And in their rage, I having hold of both, They swirl asunder and dismember me. Husband, I cannot pray that thou mayst win; Uncle, I needs must pray that thou mayst lose; Father, I may not wish the fortune thine; Grandam, I will not wish thy fortunes thrive: Whoever wins, on that side shall I lose Assured loss before the match be play'd. There where my fortune lives, there my life dies. Blanche of Castile is the niece of King John who has recently been appointed King of England. King Philip of France has just declared war with England believing that King John’s nephew, Arthur, is the true heir to the English throne. King Philip of France sends troupes to invade the English-ruled town of Angiers and threatens the citizens with attack if they do not support Arthur’s claim. The English arrive, and King Philip and King John state their claims to the people of Angiers. The people of Angier say they will support whoever is the rightful king. Philip the Bastard, King John’s half- brother, suggests Blanche should marry King Philip’s nephew, Louis the Dauphin, in order to unite France and England. Following this, Cardinal Pandolf tells Louis that his claim to the throne is as strong as Arthur, after King John is ex-communicated from the church. In this scene, Blanche has just discovered that Louis plans to invade England and go to war with her uncle, almost immediately after they are married. Antony and Cleopatra – Act Five, Scene Two Cleopatra You laugh when boys or women tell their dreams; Is't not your trick? I dream'd there was an Emperor Antony: O, such another sleep, that I might see But such another man! His face was as the heavens; and therein stuck A sun and moon, which kept their course, And lighted the little O, the earth. His legs bestrid the ocean: his rear'd arm Crested the world: his voice was propertied As all the tuned spheres, and that to friends; But when he meant to quail and shake the orb, He was as rattling thunder. For his bounty, There was no winter in't; an autumn 'twas That grew the more by reaping: his delights Were dolphin-like; they show'd his back above The element they lived in: in his livery Walk'd crowns and crownets; realms and islands were As plates dropp'd from his pocket. Think you there was, or might be, such a man As this I dream'd of? But, if there be, or ever were, one such, It's past the size of dreaming: nature wants stuff To vie strange forms with fancy; yet, to imagine An Antony, were nature's piece 'gainst fancy, Condemning shadows quite. Cleopatra is the Queen of Egypt and lives a life of decadence in Alexandria with her lover, Mark Antony. Antony is one of the three rulers of the Roman Empire and neglects his duties to Rome by spending all his time with Cleopatra. News arrives that Antony’s wife in Rome has died, and that Pompey threaten the Roman Empire. Antony leaves Cleopatra to return home to his office. In Rome, Antony’s associate, Octavius Caesar suggests to Antony that he marry his sister, Octavia, in order to fix their alliance and overpower Pompey, and Antony agrees. Antony and Octavius make peace with Pompey, but when Octavius decides to attack Pompey anyway, Antony sends Octavia back to her brother and sneaks back to Cleopatra. Learning that Cleopatra and Antony have crowned themselves King and Queen of Egypt, Octavius wages war on them. Egypt loses a battle at sea, because of Antony retreating from battle to follow Cleopatra’s fleeing ship. Cleopatra offers Octavius a secret treaty. Antony accuses Cleopatra of betraying him, Cleopatra flees to her monument and sends a false report that she has died. Antony attempts to kill himself and asks to be brought to die in Cleopatra’s arms. In this scene, Cleopatra is resolved to kill herself rather than give herself up to Roman forces and live without Antony. King Henry the Fifth – Act Three, Scene Two BOY As young as I am, I have observ'd these three swashers. I am boy to them all three; but all they three, though they would serve me, could not be man to me; for indeed three such antics do not amount to a man. For Bardolph, he is white-liver'd and red-fac'd; by the means whereof 'a faces it out, but fights not. For Pistol, he hath a killing tongue and a quiet sword; by the means whereof 'a breaks words and keeps whole weapons. For Nym, he hath heard that men of few words are the best men, and therefore he scorns to say his prayers lest 'a should be thought a coward; but his few bad words are match'd with as few good deeds; for 'a never broke any man's head but his own, and that was against a post when he was drunk. They will steal anything, and call it purchase. Bardolph stole a lute-case, bore it twelve leagues, and sold it for three halfpence. Nym and Bardolph are sworn brothers in filching, and in Calais they stole a fire-shovel; I knew by that piece of service the men would carry coals. They would have me as familiar with men's pockets as their gloves or their handkerchers; which makes much against my manhood, if I should take from another's pocket to put into mine; for it is plain pocketing up of wrongs. I must leave them and seek some better service; their villainy goes against my weak stomach, and therefore I must cast it up. The unnamed Boy is John Falstaff’s page. After Falstaff dies in the war between England and France, the boy follows Bardolph, Nym and Pistol who once were soldiers for Falstaff. In this speech, the boy tells us about what he has observed since being in the company of these men. Julius Caesar – Act Two, Scene One BRUTUS It must be by his death: and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, But for the general. He would be crown'd: How that might change his nature, there's the question. It is the bright day that brings forth the adder; And that craves wary walking. Crown him?--that;-- And then, I grant, we put a sting in him, That at his will he may do danger with. The abuse of greatness is, when it disjoins Remorse from power: and, to speak truth of Caesar, I have not known when his affections sway'd More than his reason. But 'tis a common proof, That lowliness is young ambition's ladder, Whereto the climber-upward turns his face; But when he once attains the upmost round. He then unto the ladder turns his back, Looks in the clouds, scorning the base degrees By which he did ascend. So Caesar may. Then, lest he may, prevent. And, since the quarrel Will bear no colour for the thing he is, Fashion it thus; that what he is, augmented, Would run to these and these extremities: And therefore think him as a serpent's egg Which, hatch'd, would, as his kind, grow mischievous, And kill him in the shell. Julius Caesar has returned to Rome victorious in the war against Pompey, and the republic plan to gift Caesar with many honours to reward him for his triumph. The Roman senators worry that these new titles might mean that too much power is held by Caesar. Brutus is persuaded by Cassius to join the conspirators that are plotting to assassinate Caesar. Initially, Brutus is doubtful but is convinced by Cassius that Caesar’s death would be for the greater good of the people. A Midsummer Night’s Dream – Act Four, Scene One DEMETRIUS My lord, fair Helen told me of their stealth, Of this their purpose hither to this wood; And I in fury hither follow'd them, Fair Helena in fancy following me. But, my good lord, I wot not by what power,-- But by some power it is,--my love to Hermia, Melted as the snow, seems to me now As the remembrance of an idle gaud Which in my childhood I did dote upon; And all the faith, the virtue of my heart, The object and the pleasure of mine eye, Is only Helena. To her, my lord, Was I betroth'd ere I saw Hermia: But, like in sickness, did I loathe this food; But, as in health, come to my natural taste, Now I do wish it, love it, long for it, And will for evermore be true to it. Demetrius is a young man from Athens, who once loved Helena and now loves her best friend Hermia, whom he is bound to marry.
Recommended publications
  • Killing Shakespeare's Children: the Cases of Richard III and King John Joseph Campana

    Killing Shakespeare's Children: the Cases of Richard III and King John Joseph Campana

    Campana, J. (2007). Killing Shakespeare’s Children: The Cases of Richard III and King John. Shakespeare, 3(1), 18–39. doi:10.1080/17450910701252271 Killing Shakespeare's Children: The Cases of Richard III and King John Joseph Campana This essay explores a series of affective, sexual and temporal disturbances that Shakespeare's child characters create on the early modern stage and that lead these characters often to their deaths. It does so by turning to the murdered princes of Richard III and the ultimately extinguished boy-king Arthur of King John. A pervasive sentimentality about childhood shapes the way audiences and critics have responded to Shakespeare's children by rendering invisible complex and discomfiting erotic and emotional investments in childhood innocence. While Richard III subjects such sentimentality to its analytic gaze, King John explores extreme modes of affect and sexuality associated with childhood. For all of the pragmatic political reasons to kill Arthur, he is much more than an inconvenient dynastic obstacle. Arthur functions as the central node of networks of seduction, the catalyst of morbid displays of affect, and the signifier of future promise as threateningly mutable. King John and Richard III typify Shakespeare's larger dramatic interrogation of emergent notions of childhood and of contradictory notions of temporality, an interrogation conducted by the staging of uncanny, precocious, and ill-fated child roles. Keywords: Children; childhood; seduction; sexuality; affect; temporality; Richard III; King John If it is fair to say that Shakespeare included in his plays more child roles than did his contemporaries (Ann Blake counts thirty; Mark Heberle counts thirty-nine), it is also fair to say Shakespeare provided a wide range of parts for those children: from pivotal roles in royal succession to trace presences as enigmatic markers of symbolic equations never perhaps to be solved.
  • King John Take Place in the Thirteenth Century, Well Before Shakespeare’S Other English History Plays

    King John Take Place in the Thirteenth Century, Well Before Shakespeare’S Other English History Plays

    Folger Shakespeare Library https://shakespeare.folger.edu/ Get even more from the Folger You can get your own copy of this text to keep. Purchase a full copy to get the text, plus explanatory notes, illustrations, and more. Buy a copy Contents From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library Front Textual Introduction Matter Synopsis Characters in the Play ACT 1 Scene 1 ACT 2 Scene 1 Scene 1 Scene 2 ACT 3 Scene 3 Scene 4 Scene 1 ACT 4 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 ACT 5 Scene 4 Scene 5 Scene 6 Scene 7 From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library It is hard to imagine a world without Shakespeare. Since their composition four hundred years ago, Shakespeare’s plays and poems have traveled the globe, inviting those who see and read his works to make them their own. Readers of the New Folger Editions are part of this ongoing process of “taking up Shakespeare,” finding our own thoughts and feelings in language that strikes us as old or unusual and, for that very reason, new. We still struggle to keep up with a writer who could think a mile a minute, whose words paint pictures that shift like clouds. These expertly edited texts are presented to the public as a resource for study, artistic adaptation, and enjoyment. By making the classic texts of the New Folger Editions available in electronic form as The Folger Shakespeare (formerly Folger Digital Texts), we place a trusted resource in the hands of anyone who wants them.
  • Gesture and Movement in Silent Shakespeare Films

    Gesture and Movement in Silent Shakespeare Films

    Gesticulated Shakespeare: Gesture and Movement in Silent Shakespeare Films Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jennifer Rebecca Collins, B.A. Graduate Program in Theatre The Ohio State University 2011 Thesis Committee: Alan Woods, Advisor Janet Parrott Copyright by Jennifer Rebecca Collins 2011 Abstract The purpose of this study is to dissect the gesticulation used in the films made during the silent era that were adaptations of William Shakespeare's plays. In particular, this study investigates the use of nineteenth and twentieth century established gesture in the Shakespearean film adaptations from 1899-1922. The gestures described and illustrated by published gesture manuals are juxtaposed with at least one leading actor from each film. The research involves films from the experimental phase (1899-1907), the transitional phase (1908-1913), and the feature film phase (1912-1922). Specifically, the films are: King John (1899), Le Duel d'Hamlet (1900), La Diable et la Statue (1901), Duel Scene from Macbeth (1905), The Taming of the Shrew (1908), The Tempest (1908), A Midsummer Night's Dream (1909), Il Mercante di Venezia (1910), Re Lear (1910), Romeo Turns Bandit (1910), Twelfth Night (1910), A Winter's Tale (1910), Desdemona (1911), Richard III (1911), The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912), Romeo e Giulietta (1912), Cymbeline (1913), Hamlet (1913), King Lear (1916), Hamlet: Drama of Vengeance (1920), and Othello (1922). The gestures used by actors in the films are compared with Gilbert Austin's Chironomia or A Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery (1806), Henry Siddons' Practical Illustrations of Rhetorical Gesture and Action; Adapted to The English Drama: From a Work on the Subject by M.
  • Understanding Shakespeare's King John and Magna Carta in the Light

    Understanding Shakespeare's King John and Magna Carta in the Light

    Bilgi [2018 Yaz], 20 [1]: 241-259 Understanding Shakespeare’s King John and 1 Magna Carta in the Light of New Historicism Kenan Yerli2 Abstract: Being one of the history plays of William Shakespeare, The Life and Death of King John tells the life and important polit- ical matters of King John (1166-1216). In this play, Shakespeare basically relates the political issues of King John to Queen Eliza- beth I. Political matters such as the threat of invasion by a foreign country, divine right of kings; papal excommunication and legit- imacy discussions constitute the main themes of the play. How- ever, Shakespeare does not mention a word of Magna Carta throughout the play. In this regard, it is critical to figure out and explain the reason why Shakespeare did not mention Magna Car- ta in his The Life and Death of King John, owing to the im- portance of Magna Carta in the history of England. In this respect, the analysis of The Life and Death of King John in the light of new historicism helps us to understand both how Shakespeare re- lated the periods of Queen Elizabeth and King John; and the rea- son why Shakespeare did not mention Magna Carta in his play. Keywords: Shakespeare, New Historicism, Magna Carta, Eliza- bethan Drama. 1. This article has been derived from the doctoral dissertation entitled Political Propaganda in Shakespeare’s History Plays. 2. Sakarya University, School of Foreign Languages. 242 ▪ Kenan Yerli Being one of the most important playwrights of all times, William Shakespeare wrote and staged great number of plays about English history.
  • NOT SHAKESPEARE Bardolatry and Burlesque in the Nineteenth Century

    NOT SHAKESPEARE Bardolatry and Burlesque in the Nineteenth Century

    NOT SHAKESPEARE Bardolatry and Burlesque in the Nineteenth Century RICHARD W. SCHOCH School of English and Drama Queen Mary, University of London PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CBRU,UK West th Street, New York, NY -,USA Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC , Australia Ruiz de Alarco´n , Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town , South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Richard W. Schoch This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Baskerville no. /. pt. System LATEX ε [TB] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Schoch, Richard W. Not Shakespeare: bardolatry and burlesque in the nineteenth century / Richard W. Schoch. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN . Shakespeare, William, – – Parodies, imitations, etc. – History and criticism . Shakespeare, William, – – Adaptations – History and criticism . Shakespeare, William, – – Appreciation – Great Britain. Popular culture – Great Britain – History – th century. English drama – th century – History and criticism. Theatre – Great Britain – History – th century. English drama (Comedy) – History and criticism. Burlesques. I. Title. PR.A S 0. –dc ISBN hardback Contents List of illustrations page viii Acknowledgments x Note on texts xiii Introduction ‘New Readings for Unconventional Tragedians’ ‘Vile beyond endurance’: the language of burlesque Shakespeare’s surrogates Shakespeare in Bohemia Politics ‘burlesquified’ Bibliography Index vii List of illustrations Thomas Blanchard as Guildenstern in a provincial production of Hamlet, c.
  • Redalyc.THE REAL THING? ADAPTATIONS, TRANSFORMATIONS and BURLESQUES of SHAKESPEARE, HISTORIC and POST-MODERN

    Redalyc.THE REAL THING? ADAPTATIONS, TRANSFORMATIONS and BURLESQUES of SHAKESPEARE, HISTORIC and POST-MODERN

    Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies E-ISSN: 2175-8026 [email protected] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brasil Draudt, Manfred THE REAL THING? ADAPTATIONS, TRANSFORMATIONS AND BURLESQUES OF SHAKESPEARE, HISTORIC AND POST-MODERN Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, núm. 49, julio-diciembre, 2005, pp. 289-314 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianópolis, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478348687015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative The real thing? Adaptations, transformations... 289 THE REAL THING?1 ADAPTATIONS, TRANSFORMATIONS AND BURLESQUES OF SHAKESPEARE, HISTORIC AND POST-MODERN Manfred Draudt University of Austria The practice of adapting great authors to fit current requirements is not just a recent phenomenon. The first great wave of adaptations of Shakespeare came after the period of the closing of theatres in 1642, with the advent of the Restoration in 1660. Political change was accompanied by a radical change in tastes, ideals and conditions: theatres were roofed in and artificially illuminated (like the earlier private theatres); there was also elaborate changeable scenery; and for the first time female roles were taken by professional actresses. Most importantly, French neo-classicism was adopted as the fashionable theory that shaped both the form and the language of plays. These currents of change motivated playwrights and managers to “improve on” Shakespeare by rewriting and staging his plays in accordance with the spirit of the new times.
  • Celebrating Shakespeare's Plays

    Celebrating Shakespeare's Plays

    Celebrating Shakespeare’s Plays Over 400 Years of Drama This is an Interactive Book List Click on the cover of each book to read descriptions and reviews on Amazon.com Search for these titles online at the San Diego Public Library, San Diego County Library or on the Libby app to read them for free. The Bard of Avon One of my sixth grade teachers introduced me to Shakespeare’s plays. I can still remember him telling my class that we were going to put on a really fun play called Hamlet. It had ghosts, murder and romance and that we’d get to learn how to sword fight. Putting on Hamlet was every bit as fun as he promised it would be. We all enjoyed it so much that our class put on The Taming of the Shrew during our Summer vacation. I know what you’re thinking. Why on Earth did 12 year old Ms. Furey give up her Summer break to put on a 400 year old play? That’s easy. Ghosts. Murder. Romance. Sword fighting! Shakespeare wrote plays that are amazingly fun to read, watch and perform. I hope this list will inspire you to give the Bard a try. I’m sure you’ll like him as as much as I do. --Ms. Furey Shakespearean Characters Thomas Stothard, painter (1755–1834) Tate Gallery, London, England Shakespeare’s Plays The Oxford The Complete The Complete All's Well That Shakespeare: The Works of Illustrated Ends Well Complete Works, Shakespeare Stratford (Folger 2nd Edition by William Shakespeare Shakespeare by William Shakespeare by William Library) Shakespeare Shakespeare by William Shakespeare Shakespeare’s Plays Antony and As You Like It The Comedy of
  • THE PROBLEM of the HERO in SHAKESPEARE's KING JOHN APPROVED: R Professor Suiting Professor Minor Professor Partment of English

    THE PROBLEM of the HERO in SHAKESPEARE's KING JOHN APPROVED: R Professor Suiting Professor Minor Professor Partment of English

    THE PROBLEM OF THE HERO IN SHAKESPEARE'S KING JOHN APPROVED: r Professor / suiting Professor Minor Professor l-Q [Ifrector of partment of English Dean or the Graduate School THE PROBLEM OF THE HERO IN SHAKESPEARE'S KING JOHN THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Wilbert Harold Ratledge, Jr., B. A. Denton, Texas June, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE MILIEU OF KING JOHN 7 III. TUDOR HISTORIOGRAPHY 12 IV. THE ENGLISH CHRONICLE PLAY 22 V. THE SOURCES OF KING JOHN 39 VI. JOHN AS HERO 54 VII. FAULCONBRIDGE AS HERO 67 VIII. ENGLAND AS HERO 82 IX. WHO IS THE VILLAIN? 102 X. CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY 118 in CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION During the last twenty-five years Shakespeare scholars have puolished at least five major works which deal extensively with Shakespeare's history plays. In addition, many critical articles concerning various aspects of the histories have been published. Some of this new material reinforces traditional interpretations of the history plays; some offers new avenues of approach and differs radically in its consideration of various elements in these dramas. King John is probably the most controversial of Shakespeare's history plays. Indeed, almost everything touching the play is in dis- pute. Anyone attempting to investigate this drama must be wary of losing his way among the labyrinths of critical argument. Critical opinion is amazingly divided even over the worth of King John. Hardin Craig calls it "a great historical play,"^ and John Masefield finds it to be "a truly noble play .
  • The Arden Shakespeare

    The Arden Shakespeare

    v^ THE ARDEN SHAKESPEARE GENERAL EDITOR : W. J. CRAIG CYMBELINE 'U THE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE CYMBELINE EDITED BY EDWARD DOWDEN I METHUEN AND CO. 36 ESSEX STREET: STRAND LONDON 1903 CONTENTS I'AGK Introduction • vii Cymbeline I Additional Note • • .212 INTRODUCTION The play of Cymbeliyte was printed for the first time in the Folio of 1623, where it is placed among the tragedies, and is the last play in the volume. It is there divided throughout into acts and scenes. I have found the text often difficult to ascertain, and have felt how much cause there is to regret that we possess no Quarto, by which to test the readings of the Folio and correct some of its errors. It has seemed best to be con- servative of the original text, where very strong reasons do not appear for departure from it. But I have accepted some alterations in punctuation suggested by Vaughan and others —alterations which in some instances affect the mean- ing of the passages. With respect to the collation of the Folios, for which I have used my own copies of F 2 and F 4, and the Cam- bridge edition and Mr. Craig's New Shakspere Society edition for F 3, I have noted what appears to me of im- portance and nothing more. It would have been easier to have asked the printers to set up Mr. Craig's complete collation, than to pick out the various readings which seem to me to deserve attention. The variations of the later Folios from the first do not in my eyes possess in general vii VIU INTRODUCTION even the value of editorial alterations, for the greater number of them are due to the carelessness of seventeenth-century printers.
  • Shakespeare's Plays of Deranged Authority

    Shakespeare's Plays of Deranged Authority

    Fast Capitalism ISSN 1930-014X Volume 16 • Issue 2 • 2019 doi:10.32855/fcapital.201902.004 Shakespeare’s Plays of Deranged Authority: The King’s Three Bodies Dan Krier Shakespeare and Critical Social Theory William Shakespeare wrote potent literary productions that reflected declining feudalism and emerging capitalism with uncanny veracity. Shakespeare’s history plays are propelled by storylines that not only narrate sequences of historical events but also recognize the social ontology of the threshold of capitalism. The protagonists in Shakespeare are rarely one-dimensional characters, but complex individuals with subtle, essentially modern psychological structures who have become representative types in Western thought. This article focuses on one of Shakespeare’s least-performed history plays, John, King of England, here referenced by the shorter title, King John, probably written and first performed about 1595.1 Shakespeare frequently dramatized infighting among warring factions of privileged aristocrats and royals, but he also depicted the rising commons, an emergent bourgeois order of walled towns and cities, and the displacement of honorific statecraft with a new “politics of commodity,” a concept featured prominently in King John. Shakespeare identified the central structures of both fading feudalism and rising capitalism, mapping the relationship between universal values, individual lives, and the mediating structures of social particularity. He was, in short, an early and remarkably fine sociologist. Shakespeare’s phrasings, metaphors, characters, and sequences of action were so well crafted that they leapt off the stage to circulate widely through modern culture. Shakespeare’s plays were not only performed but were published and read as literature. His audiences and readers were exposed to synthetic images that captured and preserved the feudal order as it disappeared and was canceled into emergent modern capitalism.
  • John Bale, William Shakespeare, and King John

    John Bale, William Shakespeare, and King John

    John Bale, William Shakespeare, and King John By Mark Stevenson For Les Fairfield Christmastide, 1538-1539 must have been extraordinarily busy for the priest- playwright John Bale. Already deeply enmeshed in the intrigues and stratagems of the volatile religious and political atmosphere of the time, this Christmas season found Bale in the service of Thomas Cromwell, the “mother and midwife of the English Reformation” (House 123). As an active member of Cromwell’s stable of propagandists, Bale and his peripatetic troupe of actors might very well have found themselves performing a command holiday performance of Bale’s provocative play King John at Canterbury in the presence of Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Cranmer himself. 1 Bale’s play represents one of the high points in the astonishing rehabilitation of the reputation of King John, who at the time of the Canterbury performance had been dead for more than 300 years. The emergence of King John Lackland (reigned 1199-1216) as Protestant hero and martyr might seem curious, even grotesque. He had, after all, capitulated to the intense pressure of Pope Innocent III in surrendering his nation to the power of the papacy. While John’s motives for this action were clearly mixed and some historians see the move as a brilliant tactical maneuver, the fact remains that England had become a papal fiefdom and was subsequently plunged into civil war. As a result, John’s reputation had suffered for more than three centuries. While the reformation of John’s reputation was gradual and not simply a product of Cromwell’s Protestant propaganda campaign or Bale’s skills as a polemical 1 playwright, it does reflect a fundamental refocusing and reinterpretation of English history from the new perspective occasioned by Henry VIII’s break with Rome and the parallel emergence of a uniquely Protestant view of God, King, and Country.
  • An Analysis of Five Shakespearean Characters, Richard Ii, Henry V, Coriolanus, Mark Antony, and Lear

    An Analysis of Five Shakespearean Characters, Richard Ii, Henry V, Coriolanus, Mark Antony, and Lear

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1990 Lessons in Leadership: An Analysis of Five Shakespearean Characters, Richard Ii, Henry V, Coriolanus, Mark Antony, and Lear James C. Lalley Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Lalley, James C., "Lessons in Leadership: An Analysis of Five Shakespearean Characters, Richard Ii, Henry V, Coriolanus, Mark Antony, and Lear" (1990). Dissertations. 2718. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2718 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1990 James C. Lalley LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP: AN ANALYSIS OF FIVE SHAKESPEAREAN CHARACTERS, RICHARD II, HENRY V, CORIOLANUS, MARK ANTONY, AND LEAR by James C. Lalley, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Education of Loyola University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education April 1990 James c. Lalley, Jr. Loyola University of Chicago LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP: AN ANALYSIS OF FIVE SHAKESPEAREAN CHARACTERS, RICHARD II, HENRY V, CORIOLANUS, MARK ANTONY, AND LEAR This dissertation has used three lenses for focusing an analysis of leadership. The first lens looks to elements of effective leadership found in the behavior of Shakespearean characters. The author analyzed five leaders in Shakespeare's plays and deduced the five elements of character (call them "strategies," "areas of competency," "human handling skills," or "themes") that are the sine qua non of leadership: imagination, eloquence, popularity, activis• and tenacity.