WSF Referees’ Review May 2007

WORLD FEDERATION

decision – thereby giving the sport a poor image. (A properly trained referee could stop this abuse by invoking (or threatening to invoke) Rule 17; however, because of the lack of training very few did.) This issue of the WSF Referees’ Review contains several items that discuss different aspects of the 3- Referee System. I hope that this Since the last edition of the WSF material will give all its readers cause Referees’ Review two major develop- for thought and reflection: the issue is ments have taken place in the world of not at all settled, because much work international refereeing. The first of needs still to be done in respect of the these is the re-introduction of the 3- details. And the issue of the training of Referee System. While the system has referees in the proper use of this been used only in a handful of system has not yet been addressed. Let tournaments – and thus it is still too the debate continue! early to conclude that this is the final answer to all of squash’s officiating The second major development has problems – it does seem to be the way been the approval by the WSF of a forward at this time, as is noted in the comprehensive programme of training next article. and assessment for referees at all When the 3-Referee System was levels. The Working Group that tried in the mid-1990’s, it was fated to developed this programme began its be a short-lived experiment – for three work in January 2005, so the process major reasons: 1. There was an instin- has taken almost two and a half years. ctive resistance from many referees The programme sets explicit standards who were strongly attached to the for the achievement of the various Marker/Referee system (and the fact levels of referee certification, and that the 3-referee system was viewed outlines in considerable detail how by some as “American” – and those standards are to be assessed in therefore by definition “inferior” -- each individual case. The aim of this was another nail in its coffin). 2. The programme is to provide referees with referees who used it were, by and a clear idea of what knowledge and large, never trained how to use it: skills they require at each level, and to there was a tacit assumption that a give assessors the tools to assess each qualified referee could step in and use of those criteria. Since this programme the 3-referee system without any will now be in effect for WSF training. 3. The players exploited the appointments, all of us – referees and system, by appealing almost every assessors – are going to have to study

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com the new programme and familiarize to me that the 3-Referee System is the ourselves with its provisions. way forward, but there are still several challenges to overcome. You will also find in this issue articles reporting on all the major What needs to happen now is for the 3 tournaments of the past six months. governing bodies of squash to decide Once again the Editor thanks all the on the future of the 3-Referee System. contributors to this issue: the WSF Should it be formally adopted; at what referees have once again proven to be events and in what rounds is it realistic both cooperative and reliable. to use it; who must bear the cost of increasing the number of referees required to run this system at each event?

The current timing provides us with a small window to reach a decision on The 3 Referee System – an Update this, as there are no major PSA or WISPA events on the calendar until by Graham Waters August. In July we have the Pan- American Games in Rio de Janeiro and My first report documented the the Junior Women’s World background to, and trial of, the 3 Championships in Hong Kong, but Referee System at the Windy City they will be using the traditional Open in Chicago in January. Since Marker/Referee System. that time, the system has been used at several Super Series events, sometimes It should be noted that players were with minor variations, but all with the used as one of the Side Referees in approval of the promoters and all with London and for one round only in generally the same positive results. Kuwait, but players were not used in The events at which the system has New York or Qatar. The following been used since Chicago have been: sections describe the results from each of the 4 subsequent events and · Tournament of Champions, reactions from participants. New York · ISS Canary Wharf Classic, New York London · Shaika Al Saad Kuwait Open, The system was used in an identical Kuwait City manner to the initial trial in Chicago, · Qatar Classic (06), Doha with similar results. Again, there were fewer confrontations between players The latter two events also had WISPA and referees, the final decisions were draws, so the top women players have better accepted, the referees felt less also had some experience with the stress, and the promoter was happier system. All but one of the WSF World with the overall caliber of refereeing. Referees have now used the system Comments received from New York: and several WSF International · At the ToC we sat in a line on Referees have also used it. I have had the aisle a fair distance apart. feedback from all of the referees, This made communication several of the promoters, and some awkward. players and administrators. It is clear

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com · At ToC we did not use any · A few of the player/refs players – but the use of lesser- admitted that they did not experienced referees did cause always know what decision to a lot of discomfort – and we give, either because they could just got through. not make the decision or they · At the ToC and Kuwait events were unsighted. we did get decisions wrong – · From discussions during and at even with 3 of us – but I the end of the event we all believe that the percentage of agreed that the new system wrong decisions was decreased worked. compared to the one-official system Kuwait · At both events – partly because of the inexperience of some of Here, the referees sat 15 feet back from the referees involved and partly the court on a 2-foot high purpose-built because of the view of the “referee area” platform just less than referees – blocking went the width of the court, in front of the without punishment because high main seating stand. This worked one or two of the officials quite well, but we sat apart with side failed to see a “block” and thus referees along both walls. The general did not penalise it appro- public was seated in the main stand priately. This placed extra above our platform. They could not see pressure on the central referee our hand signals. There was not any who wanted to deal with the side seating. Specific comments problem – but on occasions the received: decision of the central referee · Because of the scheduling we was not supported by the other used some players for the two. second round. I had a slight problem in recruiting players to referee - but the “players’ rep” Canary Wharf for the event quickly took over and all turned up on time. For The position of the referees was the quarterfinals and on we used same as in Chicago, and the results assigned WSF referees only. were the same. Specific comments · Where possible, I believe received: players should not referee – I · We liked the position of our spoke to numerous players at three referees. The central the event – all were uncom- referee high at the back with fortable with getting involved – his two side referees within his and many it seemed were being vision and in front of him pushed by the more senior (triangular formation). We players (those still in the think that this can only work on event!!) into helping out glass courts and it should be · Alex Gough, who left Kuwait noted that the players always immediately after losing, was wished to sit in the front row (I insistent that the players were guess this is where they willing to participate. I beg to normally watch matches from differ and so did Robert when coaching, etc). Edwards who was TD at the event

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Qatar · the worst view cast the deciding vote. At least with In Doha, because they were running this system, the “correct” both a men’s and women’s draw, the decision was reached, and organizers were using four courts nobody knew that it was not simultaneously right through the unanimous. second round. This made the use of · The very serious issue for both the 3-Referee System impossible until players and referees coming the quarterfinals, when all matches out of this system is the were played on the glass court. There inability of the central referee were two slight differences this time: to set a standard line of · We employed a marker as well thinking and stick to it, as 3 Referees, further reducing especially when the players are the onus on the Central not playing totally within the Referee, and also eliminating spirit of the game. The system the need for the Left Referee to works quite well when both keep score. We were able to players are behaving, but when do this because we had three the referee really needs to take very competent local markers action (in blocking, fishing, whom we could employ in this playing the body situations), it role. can break down. · We asked the Side Referees to indicate with a thumbs down Overall Reaction signal any ball they considered to be down, not up, or out · It takes away the real “clanger” during a rally. In this way, if or “rogue” decisions that come both Side Referees indicated a out from time to time, and may, ball was not good, the rally in time, lead to more consistent could be stopped and awarded decision-making as referees appropriately. work closely together. Comments received: · The players’ perception that · It happened quite often that the there are three officials making Side Referee on the opposite the decision has improved, in side of the court made a the main, their attitude. This different decision from the results in far fewer other two Referees on “confrontations”. crossing-the-flight situations. · Considering we are still in the This supports the old criticism early stages, both the players from the original 3-Judge and the referees are adapting to System that the person with it well. The players, without exception, prefer it and, after all, it is their game.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Announcement of New WSF for International Referee will now be Programme for the Training and accepted only from candidates who Assessment of Referees meet the requirements of either the Regional or National CBTA by John Small Programmes, as outlined in those documents. As part of the WSF Programme to improve International Refereeing, All of the requirements for each level WSF is implementing a comprehensive of referee are contained in the CBTA programme called “Competency-Based Programme for that level. The Training and Assessment (CBTA) for Programmes have been kept as simple World and International Referees”. as possible, however it must be The WSF also recommends that recognised that the training of referees Regional Federations and Member to WSF standards requires compre- Nations implement similar CBTA hensive coverage of a number of areas. programmes at Regional, National and These areas include: lower refereeing levels. - The pre-requisites for entering a The documents that describe this new programme (i.e. what previous initiative are as follows: referee qualifications are needed before starting); - CBTA Programmes for the training - The competencies required. and accreditation of World, Competencies can be put more International, Regional and simply as knowledge and skills, National referees; or what referees need to know - New Assessment Sheets for World, and what they must be able to International and Regional and do; National Referees, which meet - The training required to achieve the the requirements of the CBTA competencies; Programmes at each level; and - The assessments needed to check - Guidelines for WSF Assessors and that the competencies have Regional and National been achieved – including the Assessors, which are aimed at number and standard of these greatly improving the standard assessments; and consistency of assessments - The number of matches a candidate at each level. must referee before achieving qualification under the The Programmes, Assessment Sheets programme, including the and Guidelines for Regional and standard of these matches; and National levels are intended to be - The requirements for retaining the recommendations only; in the first qualification, once it has been instance they are recommended for achieved. those Regional Federations and Member Nations that do not already The assessment sheets are used to have their own programmes. They are record the assessment of candidates not intended to replace any existing when refereeing matches. The assess- programmes. However, the require- ment guidelines give comprehensive ments of these Programmes are pre- instructions on the use of the assess- requisites for the International Referee ment sheets so that consistent results Programme. Therefore, nominations can be achieved. When assessing a

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com candidate for a particular level, only Because of the extent of this initiative, the assessment sheet for that level can WSF intends to conduct seminars for be used as the sheet contains the candidates for the International level competencies and standards that apply and training in the new system for to that level. However, an assessor WSF assessors. These will be offered may carry out assessments for more when opportunities arise. One of the than one level from one match (e.g. an first opportunities is likely to be at the assessor assesses a candidate for the International Refereeing Conference in International level but concludes that Chennai India (December 4 & 5, the candidate has not passed at that 2007), before the World Men’s Teams level. The assessor can then fill in the Championships. sheets for the Regional level and determine whether the candidate has passed at Regional level).

WSF Referee Assignments – 1st half 2007

Month 2007 Site # Referees Assigned January Pace Canadian Classic Toronto 1 Graham Waters January Windy City Open Chicago 3 Barry Faguy, Graham Waters, John Massarella February Tournament of Champions New York 1 Roy Gingell March Fajr International Iran 1 Tahir Khanzhada March Canary Wharf London 0 * April Kuwait Open Kuwait 4 Wendy Danzey, Ian Allanach, Roy Gingell, Dean Clayton April Qatar Classic (2006) Doha 5 Wendy Danzey, John Massarella, (postponed from Nov. 2006) Graham Waters, Damien Green, Chris Sinclair April Seoul Open Seoul 2 Tahir Khanzhada, Mohammad Fayyaz May European Team Championships Riccione, 2 Dorothy Armstrong, Tony Parker (2 Assessors) Italy (A) May Canadian Nationals (Assessor) Calgary 1 Jack Flynn (A) August World Junior Women Hong Kong 4 Wendy Danzey, Chris Sinclair, Mohammad Fayyaz, Tahir Khanzhada

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

WSF Appointments and Re- New Deadline for Applications Appointments 2007 There is now a new deadline for 1. Reappointments submitting applications for appoint- ment or re-appointment as a WSF- a) World Referee referee: May 31 of each calendar year. Thus the next deadline for applications Roy Gingell will be May 31, 2008. The following is Fahim Khan an extract from a letter sent by Graham Nasser Zahran Waters:

b) International Referee “As a result of the implementation of this new [CBTA] programme, I am Harvey Bowlt announcing a change to the cycle for Dean Clayton the nomination and re-nomination of Michael Collins candidates for WSF WR/IR recog- Wendy Danzey nition. Starting with the next (2008) Barry Faguy cycle, the WSF will invite nominations Munir Shah by the end of March with a deadline Yogendra Singh for submissions of May 31st. It is hoped that the process of reviewing the 2. New Appointments candidates and announcing the results (International Referee) can be completed by the end of July in each year. This is being done for Jos Aarts several reasons: David Atkins · To more closely mirror the Jason Foster squash “season” (there are very few major events in the May, June, July period); · To avoid the Christmas holiday period that can cause some delays in completing the paper- work;To allow a full year of assessments using the new criteria to be used in next year’s review, and · To give all existing WSF Referees whose terms expire in 2008 a full year to fulfill the requirements to retain their designation.”

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Editorial

(Note: The opinions expressed in this true on the squash court when all three Editorial are the responsibility solely heads apply a similar standard. Thus it of the Editor and in no way reflect the will be incumbent on all referees to official position of the World Squash collaborate and strive to achieve the Federation.) next step: the application of a similar standard for interference by all The success of the 3-Referee System in referees. Without this, the 3-Referee PSA and WISPA events over the past System cannot function properly. six months is encouraging. A number of details have still to be worked out, If the 3-Referee System is really to before the system is refined into its become the universally accepted final form – but they are only details. method of officiating, then all referees At least we seem finally to have come have to commit themselves to ensuring upon a refereeing system that that they are all on the same page. We drastically reduces player dissatis- cannot rest on our laurels or assume faction and that improves the image of tacitly that all the top referees think the squash worldwide. same way. It is essential that those referees engage in open, constructive Over the years I have heard a number debate and discussion about the of referees claim that they “like to be standards to be applied in the hot seat” – and not doubt some referees who think this way will regret This will require that all referees (but that the new refereeing system has especially at the elite level) undertake gained a solid foothold. This is the to reach a consensus about the wrong attitude. The chief consideration standards to be applied in any tourn- should not be personal ego-gratifi- ament. It will not do, for example, that cation, but what is good for the players the assigned referees (from wherever and the game as a whole. Only one they are coming) simply arrive the day question is relevant: Which refereeing before the event and then proceed to system produces, over time, the highest referee the next day without any percentage of correct decisions? All discussion of the standards to be other considerations are secondary. applied by all. A seminar the day before the event, and regular referee With the re-introduction of the 3- meetings during the event are neces- Referee System squash has taken a sary to keep referees alerted to the major step forward. But much work issues and to ensure that all are aware has still to be done – and it would be of their responsibilities with respect to fatal to believe that we have found the standards of interpretation. Promised Land. To use a 3-Referee System in all major Because the very essence of squash tournaments, and to bring the referees refereeing depends on good judgement, together for a daylong seminar before no refereeing system will ever be the tournament begins, will entail an perfect: there will always be a extra (modest) cost. But the only subjective factor in decisions relating relevant question for the promoter is: to interference (of all kinds). “Three Do you want the best refereeing or heads are better than one” will only be not? The 3-Referee System by itself

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com will not be a universal panacea. We you, Paul, for your contributions over also need a clearly stated policy on the past few years. how it is to be used and how the officials are to be trained to use it. The most significant happening during the first half of 2007 has been the A final point: One of the obvious initial trial and subsequent use of the 3- weaknesses of the 3-Referee System is Referee System. I have reported the inability of the three referees to earlier on the initial trial in Chicago at agree during the course of a match on a the PSA Windy City Open event in course of action to penalise inappro- January. Since that time, it has been priate tactics (e.g. blocking). In other used at the Tournament of Champions sports where several officials are in New York, Canary Wharf in employed, those officials can and do London, the Kuwait Open and the communicate with each other to ensure Qatar Classic, the latter two events also a fair outcome. Why not in squash? having WISPA draws. Each time, there were minor enhancements made Rod Symington to the system, all designed to improve the overall result. Now, the three governing bodies for the sport must decide on the future of this system, and From the Director …………… plan for the increased requirement of the number of referees necessary to operate the system smoothly. An update to my original report was published earlier in this Newsletter.

WSF Referees and Assessors were placed at 9 events in the first half of 2007, including the inaugural WISPA event in Seoul. Additionally, the referees for the World Junior Women’s Championships in Hong Kong have already been assigned. Please refer to the chart showing the specific assign- ments for this period. It is very disappointing that the promoters of First of all, I would like to extend a events held in England still choose not warm welcome to the WSF Referee to utilize the services of WSF ranks to Jos Aarts, David Atkins, and Referees. The only event in the first Jason Foster, all of whom were half was the Canary Wharf Classic, but recently appointed as IR’s by there are several scheduled for later ManCom, upon the recommendation of this year, including the recently the WSF Review Board. Unfortun- salvaged Super Series Finals, the ately, we must also say goodbye to British Open, the English Open, and an Paul Ansdell, who chose not to be re- English Grand Prix event. I will be nominated because of the increasing writing to the promoters of these difficulty of juggling referee assign- events (Eventis and Paul Walters) to ments with his work as a club see if we can rectify this situation. The professional in Massachusetts. Thank second half (which doesn’t really start until late August) looks to be very busy

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com with a newly revitalized Dutch Open, Referees and Rules Committee the four events in England mentioned activities. above, World Opens in Madrid and Bermuda, the Men’s Team As always, your comments and Championships in Chennai, India, as suggestions on any aspect of our well as the usual events that tradition- program are always welcome. I look ally request WSF Referees in forward to catching up with many of Budapest, Boston, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, you during the year. and Hong Kong. Graham Waters You may have heard about the upcoming Referees Conference, which will be held just prior to the Men’s Windy City Open (18 – 23 January World Team Championships in early 2007) December in Chennai, India. Chris Sinclair and Rod Symington are the by Barry Faguy co-conveners of this Conference and they are hard at work designing some …and we mean windy! Chicago is useful, educational, and entertaining always windy, but in mid-January, in topics for inclusion on the program. I the dead of winter, it takes on new would urge as many of you as possible meaning. We thank the gods of sport to attend this conference. Further that squash is played indoors. details on the Conference as well as refereeing opportunities during the What follows is the one-week odyssey Men’s Team Championships will be of John Massarella, Graham Waters, & forthcoming shortly. Barry Faguy – a trio of three blind mi….er… officials who were The eagerly anticipated Competency unwittingly about to make officiating Based Training and Assessment report history. has been accepted by ManCom, and will be implemented over the coming The life of luxury few months. Complete details will be We were very well treated. Our available very soon. I would like to accommodations, literally around the take this opportunity to express the corner from the host venue (the gratitude of the WSF for all the very University Club of Chicago), were in hard work put in by the Working the penthouse at the Chicago Athletic Group who have produced this very Association. OK – OK – it wasn’t complete program. The Group exactly the penthouse, but it was pretty included Chris Sinclair, Rod high up. And, my view was of the alley Symington, Jennifer Birch-Jones, and – but it was a really nice alley. was led by John Small Gastronomic feasts were featured at every meal and …….OK – OK – they I am sure you will all join me in weren’t exactly sumptuous, but you wishing Carol Clements our very best know the old saying: “Hungry dogs wishes in her future career. She had will eat dirty puddings!” Of course, the the unenviable task of filling evening meals were a different story - Lorraine’s shoes, but she accomplished out in the neighboring local that challenge admirably and has been establishments because, well, we huge help to me in coordinating the ‘needed a change’.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com The tourist thing can attract, so people have to book Chicago has plenty to offer, and for the early. They say that good things come most part, each of us went off and did in small packages. his own thing with his time off – getting ‘cultured’ while visiting things Interestingly, our event crossed paths such as the Frank Lloyd Wright with the Super Bowl – the big daddy of Museum, the Chicago Museum of all American football games, and this Architecture & Design, the Chicago year Chicago was a protagonist. There Public Library, taking long walks, etc. was a palpable energy that was But on one particular day, we obvious as we walked through the city combined forces to take an enlight- in the preceding days with people ening 2-hour bus tour of the city. everywhere wearing Chicago Bears’ Needing more, we then we taxied over paraphernalia, although the game was to Navy Pier, a huge entertainment to be played thousands of miles away complex where among other things, we in Miami. spent an hour or so strolling through what is probably the world's’ largest, PSA LIVE was in attendance at the seemingly unending, permanent UCC, live streaming every match, stained-glass exhibit – a truly inspiring including some qualifiers. When not and memorable experience. But to top on duty, the three of us did stints as it all off, Graham convinced John & guest commentators for the matches. me to sign up for a ride on a plutonium And no – none of us made any nasty T141-residue-powered intergalactic comments about the decisions of the time-warp cruiser with multi-dimen- Referee on duty! sional capability and black-hole resistance – and we lived to referee Dramatic innovation again! On the first day of matches, Alex Gough, PSA board member & player, had a proposal for us. Apparently, the PSA board had recently endorsed a trial of a modification to the old 3- Referee System (WSF-tested between 1992 & 1997) – a trial designed to see if we could reduce the amount of unpleasant referee-player exchanges. That original system allowed an appeal of the Central Referee’s (CR) decision to the two others – whereupon the The main event majority ruled. In this case, they These trips are not all fun and games – wanted us to try out what I like to call and there was serious work to do, in a ‘Synchronized Officiating’ – wherein cathedral to boot! Well, maybe not all three decisions would be given exactly in a cathedral, but in the instantly – with the CR then reporting th UCC’s 9 floor “Cathedral Hall” – a the verdict. It is not an appeal system. gorgeous space created to be an You’ve probably already read the exceptional dining room – enclosed by formal WSF report of this trial by yet more wondrous stained glass works Graham Waters found at the start of depicting the various university this newsletter - so, I’ll just finish off disciplines. Unfortunately, seating with some personal impressions here. capacity is far less than the matches

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Firstly, I feel this system could be go to the 3rd Referee - and things good for the sport because it are that much faster. significantly reduces the opportunities for unpleasant confrontations – both § Honesty – I’ll admit that a couple because it pretty much eliminates those of times, I (as Central Referee) ‘off the wall’ decisions – and because forgot to check what the others there’s little opportunity for a player to signaled – and a couple of times, argue with a consensus. On a more situations were so obvious that it personal level, I lament the lessening seemed useless to consult them. of the challenge and tension that exists It’s also possible for the CR to when there’s no one else to depend on purposely ignore the other two and – but of course, any such grumbling by report only his or her own decision. an official is entirely unimportant. All of these could potentially Nonetheless, I suspect it will be a backfire however, and a CR should reality for others as well. take great care to always be able to claim that the given decision is Here, in no particular order, are some indeed the consensus – because other observations: things are not always as straight- forward as they seem. Another § Polling – Originally, the intention possibility is that the CR might was that the players should be able make a habit of not making a to see each official’s decision – and personal decision – simply getting so each official (including the CR) into the habit of reporting the would keep his hand up. Bad idea! other’s decisions – and if needed, Firstly, it proved impractical for breaking the tie. No one would be the CR to keep his hand up, as he the wiser. was busy verifying the other referees’ hand signals, recording § Clarity – Sometimes things can get the score, making the announce- confusing when, after a decision ments, and dealing with player has been rendered, an appeal is reactions. Players rarely turned made about something else. In around to look anyway. Secondly, those cases, the CR needs to take it was this option to poll the three control and make clear to all what officials that led to the event’s exactly is now under appeal – then only, and very unpleasant occur- look for the signals and relate that rence. Polling allows a singling out decision. of a specific official for abuse – a policy that can have no positive § Explanations –It becomes virtually benefit. impossible for the Central Referee to speak for the others and give an § Speed – As the report mentions, explanation. There is little use in there is a small delay at the start, relating just the CR’s reason – and but afterwards, once the Central it’s likely that that could open a can Referee gets the hang of remem- of worms. Therein lies what to me bering to check the others – it is a significant drawback – the works smoothly. Of course, if the inability of a player to adjust his CR sees that the first auxiliary play to match an explanation of a Referee agrees with his decision, decision. The Central Referee then of course, there’s no need to cannot, for example, establish by himself, a standard for effort, or a

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com standard for how much swing auxiliary Referees did see the ball interference is considered hit the line while the CR wasn’t prevented, and so on. Spectators sure and said nothing. A rally of a remain in the dark as well. hundred shots can have its natural result overturned by such an · Questions – There are times appeal. This feature escaped quite a when a Referee needs to ask few players in the course of our questions of a player. Of event. In fact, while watching the course, “Are you asking for a PSA LIVE streaming of the TOC let?” does not pose a problem from New York a month later, with synchronized officiating – several such opportunities were but “Did his racket hit you?” is missed by players. often a crucial piece of information needed before a · Referee placement – For this decision can be made when the trial, the officials were placed striker does indeed claim it. To about three feet lower and three not get this information before feet away from the CR – thus proceeding to the decision allowing the CR to easily see sequence is not ensuring the signals within a relatively fairness. The CR needs to narrow field of vision – thus clarify such matters before avoiding the need to move the allowing the decision sequence. head and thus reducing delay and need to re-focus. It also § Advisory – It should be made clear allowed all three to essentially to all the players that the system is get the same view and avoid a in use – and that a slight delay critical problem of the original should be expected. As well, the system – the fact that the issue of the inability to give auxiliary officials were placed explanation should be well under- level with the side walls. This stood by the players beforehand – often gave the third, and often so that when the CR states ‘This is deciding Referee, a very the consensus’ – everyone will skewed view. know that no explanation will be forthcoming. · Player participation – I’ve written strong opinions in the § Marker-call appeals – In a slight past objecting to having twist over what conventional professional players involved in officiating allows; it’s still worth it officiating. I’m glad to see that for a player to make an appeal on a the report to the WSF is Marker call or non-call. Typically, consistent with that opinion – with Marker and Referee, if a rally and it can’t be emphasized ends in a let, there is usually no enough. There are just too appeal, since at best it would only many potential repercussions & lead to another let anyway if the conflicts in having players Referee had a doubt. With this involved in the decision- system, things are different, making process. It’s a delusion because the appealer might have an to think that they have some outcome reversed in his favor if kind of special gift that an only he has the presence of mind to experienced official doesn’t make that appeal. Maybe both the

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com have. Finally, it quite simply Accommodation in the Grand Hyatt in looks unprofessional. downtown Manhattan proved to be an ideal base both for the squash and · Electronic option – The report some sightseeing later in the week to the WSF claims that we My roommate, Mike Riley, an ex-pat can’t give wrong hand signals – now living in Boston, lived up to the but I disagree. It’s exactly such English tradition of hospitality in a mistakenly-interpreted hand making me more than welcome both signal that led to the unpleasant on and off the court. confrontation in Chicago The 3-Referee System – Look Left referred to above. It’s easy to Look Right Look Left again – imagine a simple device with reminded me of being back in school five buttons – three on the and learning the Green Cross Code (all horizontal plane across the top about how to cross the road carefully). of the device, specifically Some very interesting conversations shaped to represent each took place after play about the various possible decision – and the hand signals, both legal and banned, other two (‘good’ & ‘not that we were supposed to be using good’) placed in a perpen- The WSF-appointed referees were ably dicular plane to eliminate supported by, amongst others, the confusion. The device is perennial visiting referees to the TOC obvious invisible to all, and – Madge, Hunt, Mo, Jennifer and with the absence of hand Grant. It was great to see Madge again displays, no one gets to see – especially after the last time (at the who decided what – and thus Women’s World Junior event in Cairo) the potential for confrontation where he had vanished with a degree just about vanishes. The CR’s of mystery and left Michael Collins unit alone – or a public display with a hefty room bill! – will register the consensus. Sorry Mike – I still couldn’t get him to Time for the tech folks to give buy a beer! it some thought? As for the Squash, there was keen qualifying at the New York Athletic Well, there you have it – a report of an Club, followed by a mixture of intense adventure and commentary to boot! and humorous squash at Grand Central Station – all watched by excellent crowds A Welshman in New York It was interesting to meet up with some (Tournament of Champions, 24 “old” friends – Clive Leach. John February – 2 March 2007) Russell, Martin Heath and my best mate Paul Johnson (PJ) – who once by Roy Gingell again told me how I had cost him victory against in the first A first-time experience for me in “the round of the British Open in Cardiff big apple” and also my first time using 1999, with a call that on a UK Radio the infamous “ 3-Referee System” Station in 2003 was voted the fourth provided for an entertaining trip in late worst refereeing decision of all time in February/early March to the world- British Sport! famous Tournament of Champions at Grand Central Station.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com The ToC benefited from great venues On the day of departure I got up at 3 expertly run by John Nimick and his a.m., moaning and groaning to my team. Mike Riley did his reputation no sister Hilary who had volunteered to harm at all by looking after me stay overnight and drive me to superbly – I only hope he can make it Nottingham to catch the 4am coach to to Wales so that I can repay the Heathrow Airport. I continued my compliment. sleep on the four-hour coach ride to Heathrow.

Sheika Al Saad Kuwait Open (5 –11 As I was leaving the coach, the driver April 2007) nearly ruptured himself throwing my case off, then as the next case was Wendy Danzey obviously light compared with mine, he threw it so hard, it knocked me for six and I went head over heels into the next coach-bay, grazing both shins badly. I eventually got to my feet when I realised I hadn’t broken both legs and met Roy, Ian and Dean, with blood running down my shins – it didn’t take much persuasion that we all needed a drink before departure, even though it was only 9am.

Three hotels were used for the tournament, one for the organisers, one for the players and one for qualifiers and referees. The New Park Hotel was a small business hotel that was

comfortable and friendly. Unfortu- nately, the pool was covered over, as it This was the third Kuwait Open named was still considered to be winter, with after Sheika Al Saad to celebrate the temperatures reaching 25C at times life of the princess who died four years during the day, though we did have ago at the age of 38. I felt most rain too. Dean and I managed the odd honoured to be allocated to this tour- hour some days chasing the last rays of nament for a second time, since it is a sun around the garden of the hotel. We sporting memorial to such a also had the use of the exclusive Al remarkable princess who herself was a Corniche Leisure Club with panoramic talented first-class squash player. views over the Gulf, we took advantage of this on semis and finals Roy Gingell (Wales), Ian Allanach days. (Scotland), Dean Clayton (England) and Nasser Zahran (Egypt) were the The tournament was played at the other nominated WSF referees. We spectacular newly built Al Qadsia were also assisted by Khalid Ali and Club, boasting sumptuous red-carpet several other local referees who were a runners on marble floors. On the same great help. site there were three international swimming pools on top of each other (three storeys), football pitches, and

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com there was also an international water entering the court made a bee-line polo competition on at the same time. straight for us saying: “Referees”, The all-glass court had been erected in followed by Sheika Fadiyah, and both a large impressive hall nearby. shaking our hands and speaking to us individually. We were made to feel most welcome by Dr Mahmoud Al Razouki, TD Mr On finals night Khalid suggested that I Hussein Maqseed (Kuwait Squash take a camel ride for the short trip from Federation Chairman), and Robert the club to the glass court, but on Edwards, with excellent hospitality. seeing the camel refusing to bend its The tournament dinner was held at the legs to let Khalid’s son off, I declined, grand Salma Sabah El Hamed Hall; as I really didn’t fancy refereeing the local costumes were presented to all ladies’ final perched on top of a the players and officials present – and camel’s hump – maybe it’s something worn by all! I’ll live to regret!

On the eve of the event Sheika Fadiyah Before leaving the Al Qadsia Club for Al Sabah (the sister of the princess the last time the Kuwait lady members who died) announced the total prize presented me with a beautiful local money would be raised by $25,000 to a costume. record breaking $250,000, helping to raise the profile of professional squash. Many thanks to Nasser for arranging tea with honey to be served while we There was a spectacular sound- and were refereeing! laser-effect opening ceremony and indoor pyrotechnics (similar to indoor fireworks) for the close. Qatar Classic (11th – 17th April We used the new “3-Referee System” 2007) – me for the first time – under the guidance of Roy, and I was pleasantly by Chris Sinclair surprised how slick it was and that the majority of players have accepted and This was the 2006 WISPA and PSA adapted to it well. A little fine-tuning Classic rescheduled. Graham Waters is needed – I managed to call a ball was TR. Also present were Wendy down that was out, after watching Roy, Danzey, Damien Green, Pete my left-side referee, point up and then Lawrence, John Massarella and Chris do a ‘thumbs down’ signal! Sinclair.

Ramy Ashour blitzed in As Qatar Airlines does not fly into 33 minutes, in stark contrast to the Australia or Canada, Mr Alaa Eldeen ladies’ marathon between Allouba of the Qatar Squash and which David won Federation did a superb job getting 3-1 in 93 minutes – a whole hour Graham, Damien and myself there – longer than the men’s match! just in time. It will be good when QA does fly into Australia soon, as it took A moment to remember for me was on Damien and me 26 hours travelling, finals night when we were all lined up with Damien spending 9 hours at KL at the back of the court for the presen- airport. tations and the Crown Prince on

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com We used 3 glass-back courts for McKenzie was getting his food at the qualifying, then two plus the all-glass buffet and almost missed the first court until quarters, then only the all- occasion when anyone had ever glass court. Early in the week the presented him with anything – his organisers feared they could not get the speed to the dais was a wonder to centre court cool enough – but they behold. sure succeeded. We absolutely froze every day; thanks John for taking your We shared rooms at the high-class WSF jumper for me to wear! Once Marriott Hotel. Unfortunately Windy when I called "Half time" a player Denzy was often confused with Wendy came off court and brought me his Danzey and was locked out of our jacket as he said he'd heard my teeth room almost daily. As always Wendy chattering – true story! Our referees’ and John worshipped the sun by the room was superb – just for us, good pool from early till late. We all ate too chairs and tables, kitchen, bathroom, much at the hotel's constant sumptuous with fruit, drinks, tea and coffee buffets, so John didn’t have any guilt supplied, as was internet access. smuggling rolls, butter, cheese and cakes out of the dining-room daily for We used standard marker/refereeing our snacks at the courts. We really until the quarters; thereafter the 3- enjoyed these until we discovered that Referee System with a marker. I am the bag he used for the unwrapped sure Graham will report further on this. food was the same bag he used for his Obviously the intent is to get the best sweaty gym clothes! result for the players, and it does take pressure off referees knowing a Transportation was excellent, with “clanger” will be over-ruled by the drivers available at any time. Some of others. In the main the players were the drivers were obviously training for happy, though the usual grumblers still the Daytona races, and we soon grumbled. learned which drivers would get us to our destination quickly and which ones The four local markers were very would get us there safely. good, and I am sure one of them will make an excellent referee if he gets We all agonised over Pete's quest for opportunities and assessments. The gold. Never has more thought been other referees want me to particularly put into a jewellery purchase. Day- thank one of the markers for bringing after-day Pete haunted the gold cans of beer to the hotel rooms. Prior markets looking and comparing prices. to that the referees each had a beer How Graham could go home with his with dinner – on one night only. The head held high I don't know, as all the look on Pete's face when he had to pay other men took diamond rings home. £4.75 for a half-pint was priceless. I However Graham did buy a prayer-mat find more and more advantages in (on which to do penance if Louise being a non-drinker. discovers this perhaps?) John St Laurent went back to "his usual tailor" We were individually welcomed and for more trousers and jackets, all of presented with a gift at the official which now have deeper pockets as Dinner. We all laughed as Mr John regularly lost his phone …and his Daaahmeeyan Grin and Mr Windy papers … and his pens … and…. Denzy were introduced. We had even more of a laugh when reporter Ian

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Nice to have seen Andrew Shelley in had hosted me in the past. Dave his cameo appearance. He arrived with collected me at the airport in his brand the players from Kuwait at midday on new Acura 4X4 – he had taken the 12th and left on the flight they had delivery earlier in the day. I was very booked him on at 5am on the 13th. It impressed, and I spent a very pleasant was good to meet up with 2 days with them recovering from jet again and to learn about his coaching lag and even getting to meet at the "Aspire Sports Academy" – and tournament referee Grant Currie for a to get his shopping tips. pre-tournament lunch. And so to the Nationals. I said goodbye to Pete Lawrence in March 2006 at the Melbourne This year’s event was held at the Commonwealth Games – his last WSF Glencoe Club, Calgary, Alberta May appointment. Then I said goodbye to 2nd – 5th and was preceded by a well- him in July 2006 at the World Junior attended Referees’ Symposium on Men's in NZ – his last World May 1st at the same venue. Squash Championships. So I again said Canada has an excellent refereeing goodbye to him in Doha – his last programme in place and the standard at overseas refereeing venture. I believe these championships was very high. In others will have the opportunity to say attendance were both a current World goodbye at his last Wales-appointed and International Referee as well as a event soon. It has been a pleasure Pete retired World and Ex-International, and we'll miss you. together with several others who have the potential to attain these grades. I Oh who won? Ramy beat David have worked with this group in the past Palmer 3/1 in 66 minutes, and Nicol and without exception everybody is defeated Natalie Grinham 3/1 in 69 willing to listen and eager to learn, minutes. including those who have already reached the top. One thing that impressed me was the willingness of players, particularly juniors and the Canadian National Championship, younger age-bracket, to try and play Calgary (May 2 – 5, 2007) the ball at all times. It was refreshing to see the game played properly or as it by Jack Flynn was meant to be played. Nobody fishing or seeking easy strokes or When the call came: “Was I willing trying to gain an advantage. This led and able to assess at The Canadian to fewer decisions and as a conse- Nationals?” there was only one quence not easy to get valid answer. I had formed many friend- assessments. The relationship between ships over the years and the players and referees was good, very opportunity to meet up again could not few instances of bad behaviour. When be missed. In spite of a squash it occurred it was immediately weekend in Aberdeen early March and punished by using Rule 17 to good a golf week in Portugal late March I effect. The camaraderie amongst the got clearance from home – I will pay group and their support for each other later – and set about making arrange- is in my opinion second to none. ments. I went out two days early to Newcomers are made very welcome, acclimatise and to spend some time encouragement and support is given with Dave and Adeline Clements, who freely. Two recent additions, Alan

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Tole and Rod McDougall stood out. me at the airport for my overnight Both have very good basic skills – flight. I had just settled into seat 31C using the correct terminology, giving for the long journey to Heathrow, decisions quickly and clearly – and I which I was not looking forward to, am confident that given the necessary when a familiar voice interrupted my experience in the coming years they thoughts. It was my nephew, whom I will achieve high grading in the had not seen for some time and who discipline. Squash Canada’s refereeing was working as a purser for BA. corps sets a fine example and is a “Follow me, Mr. Flynn“ – an upgrade credit to the game. – Happy Days! The food and drink (the latter lost on me) and turbulence Tournament Referee, Grant Currie, did so much better in first class as I slept, an excellent job, chairing a referees’ snoozed with names like Ranchridge, meeting every morning, constantly Country Hills, Nose Hill Park, the overseeing referees on duty and Shagnappi Trail and The Bow Rider arranging schedules for following days coursing through my mind. The long late at night. For the latter, he wisely flight followed by a short hop to involved senior officials in this task. Dublin and I was home but something was different – the decorators had been After the finals, the tournament ended in – payback time!– but well worth it. with a lavish banquet at the splendid Glencoe Club where among others, I My thanks to Squash Canada for the met Ian Paton, a friend of over 20 hospitality afforded to me during my years, resplendent in Hawaiian shirt stay, WSF for the assignment and most holding a pint glass – typical of all the Canadian referees who once Australian. Sunday morning the again made me very welcome. referees said their goodbyes and headed of to their respective homes. Envoi Dave picked me up at the hotel for a quick shopping trip – mainly to Golf The next issue of the WSF Referees’ Town – the dedicated Adeline was Review will be in November 2007. As attending a Squash Alberta meeting! usual, all feedback is welcome. Please And we met again for an afternoon send comments and contributions to barbeque at their home before leaving me at [email protected].

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com