Jerusalem Illustrated
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Israel and Judah: 18. Temple Interior and Dedication
Associates for Scriptural Knowledge • P.O. Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298-0990 USA © ASK, March 2019 • All rights reserved • Number 3/19 Telephone: 503 292 4352 • Internet: www.askelm.com • E-Mail: [email protected] How the Siege of Titus Locates the Temple Mount in the City of David by Marilyn Sams, July 2016 Formatted and annotated by David Sielaff, March 2019 This detailed research paper by independent author Marilyn Sams is one of several to follow her 2015 book, The Jerusalem Temple Mount Myth. Her book was inspired by a desire to prove (or disprove) Dr. Ernest Martin’s research in The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot. Ms. Sams wrote a second book in 2017, The Jerusalem Temple Mount: A Compendium of Ancient Descriptions expanding the argument in her first book, itemizing and analyzing 375 ancient descriptions of the Temple, Fort Antonia, and environs, all confirming a Gihon location for God’s Temples.1 Her books and articles greatly advance Dr. Martin’s arguments. David Sielaff, ASK Editor Marilyn Sams: The siege of Titus has been the subject of many books and papers, but always from the false perspective of the Jerusalem Temple Mount’s misidentification.2 The purpose of this paper is to illuminate additional aspects of the siege, in order to show how they cannot reasonably be applied to the current models of the temple and Fort Antonia, but can when the “Temple Mount” is identified as Fort Antonia. Conflicts Between the Rebellious Leaders Prior to the Siege of Titus A clarification of the definition of “Acra” is crucial to understanding the conflicts between John of Gischala and Simon of Giora, two of the rebellious [Jewish] faction leaders, who divided parts of Jerusalem 1 Her second book shows the impossibility of the so-called “Temple Mount” and demonstrate the necessity of a Gihon site of the Temples. -
“The Problem with the Disciples”
“The Problem with the Disciples” a sermon by Dr. William P. Wood First Presbyterian Church Charlotte, North Carolina Holy Week April 16, 2003 Text: “All of them deserted him and fled” (Mark 14:50). There is a riddle in Mark’s gospel, which has to do with the role of Jesus’ disciples. On the one hand, the disciples play a very positive role. The ministry of Jesus begins with the call of the disciples. He goes by the Sea of Galilee where Simon and Andrew are fishing with their nets. Jesus says, “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.” The same is true with James and John. They left and followed. Moreover, the disciples stay with Jesus from Galilee, to Caesarea Philippi, to Jerusalem. Peter reminded Jesus of this when he said, “We have left everything and followed you.” And they had. I. But in spite of this more positive picture of the disciples, there is yet another one, which is negative in outlook. As Paul Achtemeier puts it in his little book, Mark, “If there is any progression in the picture Mark paints of the disciples, it appears to be from bad to worse.” This shift in Mark’s gospel is a shift from the misunderstanding of Jesus to a rejection of him. In the early chapters of Mark’s gospel, the disciples don’t seem to understand what this is about. Granted, the demons recognize him as the Son of God (Mark 1:24, 34). Moreover, the crowd that surrounds him recognizes him as one with authority and responds to him in a positive way. -
Boundaries, Barriers, Walls
1 Boundaries, Barriers, Walls Jerusalem’s unique landscape generates a vibrant interplay between natural and built features where continuity and segmentation align with the complexity and volubility that have characterized most of the city’s history. The softness of its hilly contours and the harmony of the gentle colors stand in contrast with its boundar- ies, which serve to define, separate, and segregate buildings, quarters, people, and nations. The Ottoman city walls (seefigure )2 separate the old from the new; the Barrier Wall (see figure 3), Israelis from Palestinians.1 The former serves as a visual reminder of the past, the latter as a concrete expression of the current political conflict. This chapter seeks to examine and better understand the physical realities of the present: how they reflect the past, and how the ancient material remains stimulate memory, conscious knowledge, and unconscious perception. The his- tory of Jerusalem, as it unfolds in its physical forms and multiple temporalities, brings to the surface periods of flourish and decline, of creation and destruction. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHY The topographical features of Jerusalem’s Old City have remained relatively con- stant since antiquity (see figure ).4 Other than the Central Valley (from the time of the first-century historian Josephus also known as the Tyropoeon Valley), which has been largely leveled and developed, most of the city’s elevations, protrusions, and declivities have maintained their approximate proportions from the time the city was first settled. In contrast, the urban fabric and its boundaries have shifted constantly, adjusting to ever-changing demographic, socioeconomic, and political conditions.2 15 Figure 2. -
13) in Chapter 4, We've Been Looking at What the Book of James Has to Say About Temptation
How was Jesus tempted in the Garden of Gethsemane? What does Jesus' example show us about heart disturbances, temptation and self-image thoughts? (Spiral page 62; PB page 113) In Chapter 4, we've been looking at what the Book of James has to say about temptation. We know that Jesus was tempted three times in the desert (Matthew 4:1-11). What the Bible has to say about temptation applied to Jesus as well. Jesus is our model for overcoming temptation. Understanding how Jesus was successful in overcoming temptation helps us to better appreciate the spiritual dynamics involved in trials, and the temptation and deceptions within them. By failing to recognize Satan's deception, Adam and Eve did not transform their hearts during their trial. As a result, they were not able to discern how Satan was influencing their self- image thoughts, and they sinned. Later, Cain too faced a trial. While God spelled out to him that he had to change (transform his heart), Cain did not follow the Lord's guidance, and he sinned. Jesus discerned Satan's attacks. But, unlike Cain, Jesus discerned how Satan sought to use His desires to lead Him into sin. Jesus purified the Satan-influenced self-image thought by interacting with God's Holy Spirit, and Jesus did not sin. But the Bible describes other situations involving Jesus and trials. Let's look at the heart and mind dynamics in Jesus' experiences first in the upper room (John 13, 14), after leaving the upper room (John 15-17), in the Garden of Gethsemane, and then at His arrest. -
Fundamental Rule 14 – Suffering and Joy in Persecution Introduction St
Fundamental Rule 14 – Suffering and Joy in Persecution Introduction St. Vincent Pallotti meditating on the life of the Child Jesus, wrote in the Fundamental Rule: “Our Lord Jesus Christ persecuted by Herod, submitted himself to the suffering of the flight into Egypt and of his stay in that country. We must, therefore, for love of our Lord Jesus Christ, accept every suffering with love and with a holy joy through it all, always and in every circumstance, whatever the circumstances of the persecution are". (OOCC III, p. 46) Pallotti contemplated the sufferings of Jesus right from the time of his birth in a meditation which we find in the book God, the Infinite Love: “... Our Lord Jesus, in order to give us the grace to imitate Him, humiliated Himself infinitely in the mystery of the incarnation and by being born in the pain and humiliation of the manger, and by living a life which was humble, poor, suffering, persecuted, laborious, beneficent and scorned. This is the reason why He condescended to have Herod seek Him with the intention of killing Him at birth. In order to drink the bitter chalice of the mystery of the Cross to the last drop, Jesus subjected Himself to the hardships of the flight, to residence in Egypt and to His return to Nazareth. Here He lived in … obedience to His heavenly Father, and in perfect subjection to Mary, His Virgin Mother and to St. Joseph, his foster father.” (God, the Infinite Love,, med. XXIII) Reflection Suffering, in itself, is to experience evil, but Christ has made it into the greatest definite good, it is a good that leads to eternal health. -
12. BIBLICAL EPIC: 2 Kings Notes
12. BIBLICAL EPIC: 2 Kings Notes rown 2 Kings 1: Ahaziah consulted Baal-zebub. Elijah said that he would die. Ahaziah sent men to Elijah but they were consumed by fire. Ahaziah died. • 1:1-18. Elijah Denounces Ahaziah. Like his father Ahab, Ahaziah is destined to meet Elijah. The occasion for their confrontation is an injury sustained by the king when falling out of a window of his upper chamber in Samaria. Ahaziah seeks not the God of Israel but a deity of one of the Philistine cities 40 miles southwest of Samaria. The author probably changes Baal-Zebul (“Baal the prince”) to Baal-Zebub (“lord of the flies”) to express scorn for this false deity. By NT times, the name of this god is associated with Satan (Mark 3:22). As is common throughout 1-2 Kings, the LORD sends His prophet to confront the king for idolatry and Elijah announces that Ahaziah will die. Ahaziah showed the same unbelieving pragmatism his father Ahab had when Ahab looked for a prophet who would give him the answer he wanted. The prophetic word, however, cannot be brought under human control, and the God of Mount Carmel sends fire from heaven to underline this fact. Two “lords” vie for worship throughout the Elijah story (Baal and Yahweh), both of them identified with fire—and Ahaziah has chosen the wrong one. Here 100 soldiers die as a result of Ahaziah’s choice to turn from God, again showing that the sins of leaders often lead to tragic consequences for those whom they lead. -
The Upper Kidron Valley
Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Founded by the Charles H. Revson Foundation The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi Jerusalem 2010 Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies – Study No. 398 The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi This publication was made possible thanks to the assistance of the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund, San Francisco. 7KHFRQWHQWRIWKLVGRFXPHQWUHÀHFWVWKHDXWKRUV¶RSLQLRQRQO\ Photographs: Maya Choshen, Israel Kimhi, and Flash 90 Linguistic editing (Hebrew): Shlomo Arad Production and printing: Hamutal Appel Pagination and design: Esti Boehm Translation: Sagir International Translations Ltd. © 2010, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Hay Elyachar House 20 Radak St., Jerusalem 92186 http://www.jiis.org E-mail: [email protected] Research Team Israel Kimhi – head of the team and editor of the report Eran Avni – infrastructures, public participation, tourism sites Amir Eidelman – geology Yair Assaf-Shapira – research, mapping, and geographical information systems Malka Greenberg-Raanan – physical planning, development of construction Maya Choshen – population and society Mike Turner – physical planning, development of construction, visual analysis, future development trends Muhamad Nakhal ±UHVLGHQWSDUWLFLSDWLRQKLVWRU\SUR¿OHRIWKH$UDEQHLJKERU- hoods Michal Korach – population and society Israel Kimhi – recommendations for future development, land uses, transport, planning Amnon Ramon – history, religions, sites for conservation Acknowledgments The research team thanks the residents of the Upper Kidron Valley and the Visual Basin of the Old City, and their representatives, for cooperating with the researchers during the course of the study and for their willingness to meet frequently with the team. -
Entering the Passion of Jesus – Chapter 6 Gethsemane: Risking Temptation
Entering the Passion of Jesus – Chapter 6 Gethsemane: Risking Temptation The Gospels again present us with variations on a theme. The name Gethsemane appears only in Matthew and Mark. Luke setts the scene on the Mount of Olives while John places it in a garden across the Kidron valley. When we put these descriptions together we arrive at “the garden of Gethsemane.” In the synoptic Gospels Jesus suffers in these moments before his arrest and prays earnestly that “this cup” would pass from him.” In John’s Gospel, Jesus is not in agony, he is in control. There is no prayer for the cup to pass, for throughout the Gospel Jesus has been anticipating being “lifted up.” “The Gospels give us a choice, which is a blessing. We can choose which depiction speaks most fully tour hearts: the man of sorrows or the triumphant conqueror. Different people will necessarily have different perceptions of Jesus, and of God.” The Risks “Gethsemane is the biggest risk of all. Jesus is about to be arrested. Could he have stopped the arrest? Of course. Could he have run away? Of course. His disciples are armed, so he could have asked them to do something.” The risk is the knowledge that he can save himself and choosing not to do so. There is also divine risk, Jesus will suffer, and God will suffer as well. “The darkening clouds at the cross are divine pathos. The rending of the Temple veil represents not some form of new access to God, since God is everywhere and everyone always has access. -
Volume 23 Number 2 the Windmill Fourth Day Group February 2013
Volume 23 Number 2 The Windmill Fourth Day Group February 2013 Danny The wind blows where it wishes, Don Taylor Dobson and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or Community Community where it goes. So it is with Spiritual Lay everyone who is born of the Spirit. Director Director John 3:8 To be “a little more like There is an old saying that “Man Plans…God Laughs.” Jesus” Nowhere is this saying more The Emmaus 72 hour apropos than in our everyday lives. walk gives you a lot of time The first talk of all Emmaus walks to reflect and be in the is the “Priorities” talk. It is a talk about the Priorities we set for presence of Jesus learning ourselves in our lives. Back in what you need for the day October of 2012 Kelly Sowell’s when you come “down from priority was to be the Lay Director the mountain” and have to for the 2013 Women’s Walk, but it face the demons, the troubles, seems that God had a different and the realities that we do plan in mind. Kelly is now in the not always walk with Jesus. I process of adopting a child who have known people who very much deserves a loving Mom crashed and burned after their and family. Kelly’s new Priority is walk because they left the the future of this beautiful child community that was raising who is a gift from God. I applaud and congratulate Kelly for them. On the walk we choosing to set her Priority on promise to be “a little more taking care of this child and I am like Jesus”, hoping and also very proud to know and be praying that we will not let associated with such a fine, loving GATHERING SCHEDULE him down in that real world. -
The Temple Mount/Haram Al-Sharif – Archaeology in a Political Context
The Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif – Archaeology in a Political Context 2017 March 2017 Table of contents >> Introduction 3 Written by: Yonathan Mizrachi >> Part I | The history of the Site: How the Temple Mount became the 0 Researchers: Emek Shaveh Haram al-Sharif 4 Edited by: Talya Ezrahi >> Part II | Changes in the Status of the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif 0 Proof-editing: Noa Granot from the 19th century to the Present Day 7 Graphic Design: Lior Cohen Photographs: Emek Shaveh, Yael Ilan >> Part III | Changes around the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and the 0 Mapping: Lior Cohen, Shai Efrati, Slava Pirsky impact on the Status Quo 11 >> Conclusion and Lessons 19 >> Maps 20 Emek Shaveh (cc) | Email: [email protected] | website www.alt-arch.org Emek Shaveh is an Israeli NGO working to prevent the politicization of archaeology in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and to protect ancient sites as public assets that belong to members of all communities, faiths and peoples. We view archaeology as a resource for building bridges and strengthening bonds between peoples and cultures. This publication was produced by Emek Shaveh (A public benefit corporation) with the support of the IHL Secretariat, the Federal Department for Foreign Affairs Switzerland (FDFA) the New Israeli Fund and CCFD. Responsibility for the information contained in this report belongs exclu- sively to Emek Shaveh. This information does not represent the opinions of the above mentioned donors. 2 Introduction Immediately after the 1967 War, Israel’s then Defense Minister Moshe Dayan declared that the Islamic Waqf would retain their authority over the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif compound. -
The Marwani Musalla in Jerusalem
Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Art Faculty Publications Art Department 2013 The aM rwani Musalla in Jerusalem: New Findings Beatrice St. Laurent Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Isam Awwad Virtual Commons Citation St. Laurent, Beatrice and Awwad, Isam (2013). The aM rwani Musalla in Jerusalem: New Findings. In Art Faculty Publications. Paper 8. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/art_fac/8 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. The Marwani Shortly after Caliph ‘Umar ibn al- Khattab’s (579-644, caliph 634-644) Musalla in arrival in Jerusalem in 638, he is said to Jerusalem: have constructed a rudimentary mosque 1 or prayer space south of the historical New Findings Rock now contained within the Dome of Beatrice St. Laurent the Rock (completed 691) on the former and Isam Awwad Temple Mount or Bayt al-Maqdis known popularly since Mamluk and Ottoman times as the Haram al-Sharif.2 (Fig.1) Though later textual evidence indicates that ‘Umar prayed somewhere south of the “rock” and later scholars suggest that he constructed a rudimentary prayer space on the site, there is no surviving physical evidence of that initial structure. After his appointment as Governor of Syria (bilad al-sham) by ‘Umar in 639/40, Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (602-680, caliph Figure 1: Air view of the Haram al-Sharif from 660-680)3 either expanded upon the Mosque the north showing the eastern area of the Haram al-Sharif. Source: Matson Collection, Library of of ‘Umar or constructed an entirely new Congress. -
A Timeline of Yeshua Messiah's Life • Eternal Existence with the Father • Descent to Earth from Heaven
a division of Flower Girl Greetings, LLC devotionals by Beth Ann Phifer A Timeline of Yeshua Messiah’s Life Taken from the Gospel accounts and other Scripture (An Ongoing Document) • Eternal Existence with the Father • Descent to earth from heaven • Conception in Mary at Nazareth • Travel to and Birth in Bethlehem • Ministry in Galilee and Judea – loving, teaching, delivering, and healing • Journey toward Jerusalem • Descent from the Mount of Olives into Jerusalem on a donkey Sunday − Jesus came from Jericho to Bethany where Mary anointed His feet with costly oil. He ate a meal and spent the night with His dear friends, Lazarus, Martha, and Mary the night before. Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead in a previous visit. − Jesus journeyed from Bethany to the Mount of Olives (about one mile northwest of Bethany). − Jesus began His descent into Jerusalem on a donkey colt with crowds shouting Hosanna to the Son of David! (John 12) in fulfillment of Zechariah 9:9-10 (that He came in peace to reconcile the nations to Himself). Many Jews had come to the City this week before Passover to prepare for the Feast; they were hearing from other Jews that Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead. − Jesus came to the Temple in Jerusalem, looked around and saw everything (Mark 11:11), then went back to Bethany. Jesus and His disciples spent each evening outside of the City (Mark 11:19) − Jesus came into the City and cleansed the Temple (Mark 11:12,15) saying, “Is it not Monday written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? But you have made it a robbers’ den.” (Mark 11:17) − Jesus spent the night in Bethany.