DOCSLIB.ORG

Thinkong Ahead for Sustainable Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thinkong Ahead for Sustainable Development Pontis 2015 |5 Focused on development cooperation Digest Thinkong Ahead for Sustainable Development “The projects that do best on GlobalGiving are the organizations that clearly benefit people,” maintains Mari Kuraishi the digital age. Could you explain tions than it might have had. So we how exactly this model works and wanted to create a platform that could describe the pillars on which it do exactly that; send money to any stands ? organization in the world, regardless of size, that was doing good work that We founded GlobalGiving in 2001 could potentially increase the scope for before crowdfunding really existed, with innovation, and, ultimately, make com- the desire to do international develop- munities better. That was the reason we ment differently. Both my co-founder created GlobalGiving—not because we and I worked at the World Bank so we felt there was some great new world to had deep experience with the way devel- be explored in crowdfunding. Instead, opment was done in the world of official crowdfunding became a way to accom- aid. We felt that the problem with offi- plish the goal of pushing ownership of cial multilateral aid was that resources the development agenda back into the tended to flow to organizations that communities where it belonged, and were established, could handle large opening up space for innovation. In amounts of money and perhaps had other words, we wanted to do interna- a good relationship with some of their tional development better, which meant governments. That meant that organi- we had to do it differently. So that’s how zations that were smaller and wanted we stumbled onto crowdfunding. We Mari Kuraishi, Co-Founder and President of to test new ideas that were not proven started by saying “let’s support smaller GlobalGiving and that were not necessarily always organizations, let’s see if we can sup- in a position to have a good relation- port organizations that are first and GlobalGiving as an NGO provides ship with the government, usually got foremost grounded in community”. We a new and modern model of fun- fewer resources. As a result, the field then said, “Well, who can support these Published by the Pontis Foundation, Zelinárska 2, 821 08, Bratislava, Slovakia. draising that fits perfectly into of development has had fewer innova- organizations ?” the answer seemed to phone: (421 2) 5710 8111, fax: (421 2) 5710 8125, [email protected], [email protected], www.nadaciapontis.sk The Pontis Digest is co-financed by the SlovakAid. The views expressed in the Pontis Digest do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the SlovakAid. 2 Pontis Digest | 2015–5 | Digest Pontis crowdfunding platform. Therefore, Therefore, platform. crowdfunding GlobalGiving is a mission driven driven mission a is GlobalGiving doing the best work. best the doing to them, and which organizations are are organizations which and them, to what are the things that are meaningful meaningful are that things the are what These people systematically think about about think systematically people These money you should be giving it away. away. it giving be should you money it’s accepted that if you have enough enough have you if that accepted it’s do towards the end of the year, and and year, the of end the towards do others give because it’s a thing that we we that thing a it’s because give others to, a friend or family member. And And member. family or friend a to, in the US, because someone asks them them asks someone because US, the in In addition many people give, at least least at give, people many addition In about animals, they are animal lovers. lovers. animal are they animals, about related to animals because they care care they because animals to related might be attracted to do something something do to attracted be might think of Burkina Faso. Other people people Other Faso. Burkina of think Faso. So when they think of giving they they giving of think they when So Faso. one insight and it has turned into a a into turned has it and insight one with experimented We that ? change we served in the Peace Corps in Burkina Burkina in Corps Peace the in served logotyplogotyplogotyplogotyplogotyp organizácie organizácie organizácie organizácie organizácie their employees’ generosity. So that was was that So generosity. employees’ their innovations—could for known not was everybody. Some people may have have may people Some everybody. to reach out to companies who support support who companies to out reach to it respected, really was and business There are different motivations for for motivations different are There prípustnéprípustnéprípustnéprípustnéprípustné farebné farebné farebné farebné farebné varianty varianty varianty varianty varianty giving ? Which is when we got the idea idea the got we when is Which giving ? of lot a did Bank the while that was ferent projects ? ferent ourselves, when do people think about about think people do when ourselves, tackle to asked were we challenges the - dif support and donate to people So that forced our first pivot. We asked asked We pivot. first our forced that So of One Bank). World the (at strategy ects. What do you think motivates motivates think you do What ects. first thing that most people think about. about. think people most that thing first corporate as well as innovation ness - proj grassroots and NGOs tries, were thinking about, but that’s not the the not that’s but about, thinking were - busi of charge in were I and Denis - coun of range wide see can we site orphans in South Africa. That’s what we we what That’s Africa. South in orphans GlobalGiving ? - web your On approach. to-many wondering how they can support AIDs AIDs support can they how wondering How did you come up with idea of of idea with up come you did How GlobalGiving is pursuing a many- a pursuing is GlobalGiving ized, people don’t get up in the morning morning the in up get don’t people ized, a site and nobody came. And we real we And came. nobody and site a - are documented. are money-laundering or terrorist activities. terrorist or money-laundering give money to these projects. We built built We projects. these to money give to financial resources when those gains gains those when resources financial to nizations even indirectly connected to to connected indirectly even nizations anything about how to get donors to to donors get to how about anything they can be rewarded with better access access better with rewarded be can they - orga to money sending unintentionally the World Bank, but we did not know know not did we but Bank, World the improve how they are working, so that that so working, are they how improve on our site, to ensure that we were not not were we that ensure to site, our on work in the field because we came from from came we because field the in work to do things differently, to constantly constantly to differently, things do to diligence on every organization that is is that organization every on diligence a lot about organizations doing great great doing organizations about lot a from community groups on the ground ground the on groups community from way we had to carry out upfront due due upfront out carry to had we way much about philanthropy. We knew knew We philanthropy. about much ing platform to incentivise behaviour behaviour incentivise to platform ing the US that completely changed the the changed completely that US the first started out we did not know very very know not did we out started first - fundrais a as position our used have After 9 / 11, laws came into force in in force into came laws 9 / 11, After us to do things differently. When we we When differently. things do to us about doing development better, we we better, development doing about ated with international grant making. making. grant international with ated There were many things that caused caused that things many were There And finally, because we are passionate passionate are we because finally, And there were no criminal penalties associ penalties criminal no were there - money that goes through GlobalGiving. GlobalGiving. through goes that money ronment for us drastically. Before that that Before drastically. us for ronment ing ? that is a substantial amount of the the of amount substantial a is that US which changed the regulatory envi regulatory the changed which US - - think of way your in breakthrough py, or cause-related marketing. And And marketing. cause-related or py, were founded 9 / 11 happened in the the in happened 9 / 11 founded were a specific situation that led to a a to led that situation specific a - philanthro corporate giving, employee on a completely different note, after we we after note, different completely a on lenges and situations. Was there there Was situations. and lenges responsibility, whether it’s through through it’s whether responsibility, of the work we do today as well. Finally, Finally, well. as today do we work the of - chal new to adjust to order in ible panies that engage in corporate social social doplnkovécorporate in doplnkové doplnkovédoplnkovéengage doplnkovéthat panies farby farby farby farby farby opportunities. So disaster work is a lot lot a is work disaster So opportunities. - flex be to had you years the Over - com from come actually GlobalGiving of people go online looking for these these for looking online go people of a way to support these organizations. these support to way a through flow that resources of lot a als, that after disasters far greater numbers numbers greater far disasters after that we decided to leave the Bank and invent invent and Bank the leave to decided we - individu from money of lot a get do we ing up as one the results.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Africa Crowdfunding Landscape Study
    REPORT | OCTOBER 2016 East Africa Crowdfunding Landscape Study REDUCING POVERTY THROUGH FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT Seven Things We Learned 1 2 3 4 East African East Africa’s Crowdfunding There’s appetite to crowdfunding platforms report risks and the do business and to markets are on promising regulatory learn more from the move. progress. environment. across East Africa. Crowdfunding platforms Since 2012 M-Changa In Kenya, for example, Over 65 participants at- (donation, rewards, debt has raised $900,000 Section 12A of the Capi- tended the Indaba & and equity) raised $37.2 through 46,000 tal Markets Act provides a Marketplace from all cor- million in 2015 in Kenya, donations to 6,129 safe space for innovations ners of the East African Rwanda, Tanzania and fundraisers. Pesa Zetu to grow before being sub- market. Uganda. By the end of Q1 and LelaFund are also ject to the full regulatory 2016, this figure reached opening access to their regime. $17.8 million – a 170% deals on the platform. year-on-year increase. 5 6 7 East Africa’s MSMEs ex- There are both commercial Global crowdfunding press a demand for alterna- and development oppor- markets are growing tive finance, but they’re not tunities for crowdfunding fast but also evolving. always investment-ready or platforms in East Africa. Finance raised by crowdfunding able to locate financiers. Crowdfunding platforms have the platforms worldwide increased from 45% of Kenyan start-ups sampled re- potential to mobilise and allocate $2.7 billion in 2012 to an estimated quire between $10,000 and $50,000 capital more cheaply and quickly $34 billion in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Financing of Creative Projects on the Kickstarter Platform: Ukrainian and Polish Experience
    E3S Web of Conferences 166, 13019 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613019 ICSF 2020 Innovative financing of creative projects on the Kickstarter platform: Ukrainian and Polish experience Iuliia Gernego1,*, Liudmyla Petrenko2, Mykhailo Dyba1, and Vitalii Tsarov2 1Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Corporate Finance and Controlling Department, 54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine 2Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Business Economics and Entrepreneurship Department, 54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine Abstract. In the era of digital economy, the crowdfunding platforms provide the background to mitigate cross-country differences within project financing. In particular, creative projects are important as a vital driver in maintaining business and social sector competitive. Thereby, research problem lays upon the potential of providing crowdfunding support to overcome the creative project divide in different countries. The paper aims to provide scientific support on creative projects innovative financing in Ukraine and Poland within Kickstarter. The research methodology is based on Kickstarter data (10 years; 83 industries and 898 projects) processed by statistical analysis. The Concentration Ratio (CR) was modified to measure the concentration of efforts, considering the largest creative industries within Kickstarter platform. The results section represents high rates of concentration of efforts for Ukrainian creative projects that commercialize tangible physical goods: Product Design and Gadgets. At the same time, in Poland the main concentration of efforts is in the field of intangible intellectual products: Tabletop Games and Video Games. Thus, digital platform is a reflection of interrelations between intangible and tangible values in economies. The study results can be used within national programs of creative innovative projects financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowd Power – Success & Failure, the Key to a Winning Campaign
    CROWD POWER Success & Failure: The Key to a Winning Campaign Davinia Cogan and Simon Collings 1 CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5 3.0 The Layers of Success ..............................................................................................................................7 3.1 Donation .........................................................................................................................................................11 3.1.1 Choosing the Right Platform....................................................................................................................................................................11 3.1.2 The Campaign Period ..................................................................................................................................................................................13 3.1.3 Implementing Campaign Goals & Success into the Future .......................................................................................16 3.1.4 Q&A – Kenya Green Supply ..............................................................................................................................................18 3.2 Reward ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I Mmmmmmmm I I Mmmmmmmmm I M I M I Mmmmmmmmmm 5A Gross Rents
    OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation I or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation À¾µ¼ Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury I Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2018 or tax year beginning 02/01 , 2018, and ending 01/31 , 20 19 Name of foundation A Employer identification number SALESFORCE.COM FOUNDATION 94-3347800 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) 50 FREMONT ST 300 (866) 924-0450 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption applicatmionm ism m m m m m I pending, check here SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 m m I G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, checkm hem rem anmd am ttamchm m m I Address change Name change computation H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminamtedI Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month terminmatIion end of year (from Part II, col.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Diaspora Remittances & Investments
    SEND MONEY invest &in KenYA A guide for diaspora remitTances & investments This Action is supported This Action is funded by the Secretariat of the by the European Union ACP Group of States 2 The contents of this booklet are the sole responsibility of the author and cannot be taken to reflect the views of the ACP Secretariat, ACP States, the European Commission or the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the booklet do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the ACP Secretariat, ACP States, the European Commission or the IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. The ACP Secretariat, the ACP States, the European Commission or the IOM do not make any warranties or representations, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of this booklet. Under no circumstances shall they be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered that is claimed to have resulted from the use of this booklet, including, without limitation, any fault, error, omission, interruption or delay with respect thereto. This booklet contains links to third-party websites. The linked sites are not maintained or controlled by the ACP States, the ACP Secretariat, the European Commission or the IOM. The ACP States, the ACP Secretariat, the European Commission or the IOM are therefore not responsible for the availability, content or accuracy of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE an Overview of Leading Peer-To-Peer Fundraising Software Platforms and Their Functionality 2018 EDITION
    INCLUDES THE GUEST ARTICLE “Fundraging with Friends” BY AMY SAMPLE WARD CEO, NTEN THE PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE An Overview of Leading Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Software Platforms and Their Functionality 2018 EDITION © 2018 Cathexis Partners Version 1.1 ABOUT THIS GUIDE This guide was created for nonprofits as an introduction to some of the leading software platforms available today for peer-to-peer online fundraising. It provides an overview of 39 products and their functionality in six areas: • Design capabilities • Engagement capabilities • User interface • Administrative interface • Integration capabilities • Pricing Important Notes This guide covers many of the leading platforms available for peer-to-peer fundraising as of the guide’s writing. The world of peer-to-peer fundraising technology is continually changing; vendors are continually updating and enhancing their platforms and introducing new features. This guide offers an introduction to each platform, and does not attempt to include every detail about every feature included in each platform. Cathexis Partners strongly recommends that organizations review their specific requirements to support their campaign(s), mission, and audience; request software demos; and closely review any contracts with software platform vendors before making a software purchase. Cathexis Partners has not received compensation for including any product or information in this guide. Please note: The example campaigns provided in this guide may be seasonal, and links may not work in the future. © 2018 Cathexis Partners The Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Technology Landscape 2 SOFTWARE PLATFORMS INCLUDED • Arreva • GivingGrid • CauseVox • Giving Spirit • Charidy • GlobalGiving • CharityEngine by BIS Global • iRaiser • CharityWeb • Kindful • Classy • Mightycause (previously Razoo) • Click & Pledge • NeonCRM by Z2 Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Key Characteristics of Creating a Culture of Innovation
    Intentional Innovation How Getting More Systematic about Innovation Could Improve Philanthropy and Increase Social Impact August 2008 Intentional Innovation: How Getting More Systematic about Innovation Could Improve Philanthropy and Increase Social Impact Prepared for the W. K. Kellogg Foundation August 2008 By Gabriel Kasper, Monitor Institute and Stephanie Clohesy, Clohesy Consulting FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Foreword ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..………. 4 Introduction – Three Short Stories about Systematic Innovation ……………………………..…………..…… 6 A Framework for Thinking About Innovation in Philanthropy ………………………………………..…......…. 11 Setting the Conditions …………………………………………………………..……………….…..….….. 14 Problem or Opportunity Definition ………………....……………………………….....……..……..…..… 15 Idea Generation …………………………………………………………………………….…......…...…… 18 Piloting & Prototyping ………………………………………...……………………………………..……… 22 Diffusion & Scaling …………………………………………………...………………………………..…… 26 Culture for Innovation …………………………………………...…………………………………..……… 29 Opportunities for Innovation in Philanthropy ……………………………………………………..……...……… 34 Roles in the Innovation Process ………………………………………………………………………....…..…… 57 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………….......…...…… 65 Selected Resources ……………………………………………………………………………………..........…… 68 FOREWORD FOREWORD FOREWORD By Sterling Spe FOREWORD By Sterling Speirn, Anne Mosle and Tom Reis, W.K. Kellogg Foundation Innovation is about what’s new and what’s next. It’s about that exciting leap forward into uncharted territory.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY PLAN 0.3 FOUNDATION 22STARS 2018-2022 Updated
    POLICY PLAN 0.3 FOUNDATION 22STARS 2018-2022 Updated: 15 November 2018 Stichting 22STARS Kasteelplein 73 4811 XC Breda [email protected] www.foundation22stars.org RSIN: 85744249 KVK-nummer: 68437870 Policy Plan 22STARS Foundation 2018-2022 www.foundation22stars.org Table of Contents Prefex ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Mission and vision ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Background story of the 22STARS Foundation ................................................................... 6 3. Target group .......................................................................................................................... 7 4. Programs ................................................................................................................................ 7 5. Foundation Board members ................................................................................................. 8 5.1 Foundation Team member including ambassadors ................................................................... 9 6. Finances ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Crowdfunding and Initial Coin Offerings
    Small Bus Econ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00330-2 The entrepreneurial finance markets of the future: a comparison of crowdfunding and initial coin offerings Joern H. Block & Alexander Groh & Lars Hornuf & Tom Vanacker & Silvio Vismara Accepted: 19 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Entrepreneurial finance markets are in a development of the markets. We conclude with sug- dynamic state. New market niches and players have gestions for future ICO and CF research. developed and continue to emerge. The rules of the game and the methods for receiving financial back- Keywords Entrepreneurial finance . SME financing . ing have changed in many ways. This editorial and Crowdfunding . Initial coin offering . ICOs . Blockchain the special issue of Small Business Economics focus on crowdfunding (CF) and initial coin offerings JEL classifications L26 . G23 . G24 . G30 (ICOs), which are two distinct but important entre- preneurial finance market segments of the future. Although the two market segments initially appear 1Introduction to be similar, we identify differences between them. Our comparison focuses on the stakeholders, micro- Technological development and regulation and the rise structures, regulatory environments, and of social media had tremendous effects on the J. H. Block (*) L. Hornuf Department of Management, Fachbereich IV, Universität Trier, CESifo, Munich, Germany Universitätsring 15a, 54296 Trier, Germany e-mail: [email protected] T. Vanacker : S. Vismara Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium J. H. Block Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany T. Vanacker J. H. Block e-mail: [email protected] Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands S. Vismara A. Groh e-mail: [email protected] EMLYON Business School, Ecully, France e-mail: [email protected] T.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Democracy
    RECLAIMING DEMOCRACY GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE SAN FRANCISCO BAY | APRIL 1–3 RECLAIMING DEMOCRACY GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 1–3, 2 19 SAN FRANCISCO BAY 2019 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2019 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Minor adjustments have been to remarks for clarity. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team— Meghan Kennedy, Angelina Donhoff, Suzy Antounian, Claire McMahon, Carla Thorson, Julia Levin, Taytum Sanderbeck, Jarrod Sport, Laura Beatty, Sylvia Hacaj, Isaac Mora, and Lucia Johnson Seller—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Anonymous Newman’s Own Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation The David & Lucile Packard Margaret A. Cargill Foundation Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation Sall Family Foundation World Bank Group SUPPORTING MEMBERS African Development Fund MEMBERS The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley William Draper III Charitable Trust Draper Richards Kaplan Foundation Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Felipe Medina Humanity United Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation MacArthur Foundation The MasterCard Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    2017 2017 YEAR IN REVIEW Since 2002, more than 741,136 donors have given $315 million to 18k+ projects in 170 countries. 2017 was our most successful year yet: $65.9M 3,953 355K raised organizations funded donations Championing locally driven disaster relief 2017 brought an unprecedented string of disasters—in four weeks from August to September, eight major disasters struck around the world. But the GlobalGiving community proved how powerful the crowd can be. We raised $27M from 119,425 people who believe in community-led disaster relief. Hurricane Maria Famine Rohingya Refugee Crisis GlobalGiving raised $10.8M from 20M people were affected by The HOPE Foundation is one of 47.5k donors, funding 27 local drought and famine across several partners responding to the organizations after the storm. Africa and the Middle East this mass exodus of more than 640,000 Jake’s Diapers alone raised year. Inspiring changemakers Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, $92,271 for families in Puerto Rico like Fatuma Abdulkadir Adan in a crisis that has been described struggling to care for their babies are reducing suffering in their as “textbook ethnic cleansing.” Dr. in the wake of the hurricane. communities and building resilience Iftikher Mahmood, HOPE’s founder, against drought for the long term. is helping mothers on the run heal. Accelerating Community-led Change • We added more than 400 new organizations and six new countries to GlobalGiving in 2017, and we’re excited to introduce the “Help raise awareness about animal rights in Sweden” project, our first in the country! • Facebook’s 2 billion users will now be able to assist disaster victims through a GlobalGiving-powered “Crisis donate button.” • We published more than 150 articles, case studies, and videos in our Learn Library, an online resource center for nonprofits, companies, and donor funded in 2017 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding Our Health: Economic Risks and Benefits
    Matthew J. Renwick and Elias Mossialos Crowdfunding our health: economic risks and benefits Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Renwick, Matthew J., Mossialos. (2017) Crowdfunding our health: economic risks and benefits. Social Science & Medicine. ISSN 0277-9536 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.035 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2017 The Authors CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/84165/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Accepted Manuscript Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits Matthew J. Renwick, Elias Mossialos PII: S0277-9536(17)30516-6 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.035 Reference: SSM 11375 To appear in: Social Science & Medicine Received Date: 13 November 2016 Revised Date: 9 June 2017 Accepted Date: 28 August 2017 Please cite this article as: Renwick, M.J., Mossialos, E., Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits, Social Science & Medicine (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.035. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form.
    [Show full text]