DOCSLIB.ORG

Toxicological Review (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toxicological Review (PDF) EPA/635/R-08/003F www.epa.gov/iris TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF PROPIONALDEHYDE (CAS No. 123-38-6) In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) September 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii CONTENTS—TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF PROPIONALDEHYDE (CAS No. 123-38-6) LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................. vi FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................ vii AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS ...............................................................viii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION .................................................................... 3 3. TOXICOKINETICS ................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. ABSORPTION.................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1. Oral.............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1.2. Inhalation..................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. DISTRIBUTION................................................................................................................. 6 3.3. METABOLISM .................................................................................................................. 6 3.4. ELIMINATION .................................................................................................................. 7 3.5. PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED TOXICOKINETIC MODELS........................................ 7 4. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION................................................................................................... 8 4.1. STUDIES IN HUMANS—EPIDEMIOLOGY, CASE REPORTS, CLINICAL CONTROLS.......................................................................................................................... 8 4.2. SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC STUDIES AND CANCER BIOASSAYS IN ANIMALS—ORAL AND INHALATION .......................................................................... 8 4.2.1. Oral Studies................................................................................................................. 8 4.2.2. Inhalation Studies........................................................................................................ 8 4.3. REPRODUCTIVE/DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES―INHALATION............................. 9 4.4. OTHER STUDIES............................................................................................................ 12 4.4.1. Genotoxicity.............................................................................................................. 12 4.4.1.1. Bacteria.............................................................................................................. 12 4.4.1.2. Mammalian Cells In Vitro................................................................................. 14 4.4.1.2.1. Mutagenicity. ............................................................................................. 14 4.4.1.2.2. Chromosomal aberrations......................................................................... 17 4.4.1.2.3. DNA damage.............................................................................................. 18 4.4.1.2.4. Non-DNA adduct formation....................................................................... 21 4.4.1.3. Genotoxicity Summary...................................................................................... 21 4.4.2. Cardiovascular Effects .............................................................................................. 22 4.4.3. Immunotoxicity ......................................................................................................... 24 4.4.4. Cytotoxicity............................................................................................................... 25 4.4.5. Comparative Toxicity of Related Aldehydes ............................................................ 25 4.5. SYNTHESIS AND EVALUATION OF MAJOR NONCANCER EFFECTS ................ 29 4.5.1. Oral............................................................................................................................ 29 4.5.2. Inhalation................................................................................................................... 30 iii 4.6. WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE EVALUATION AND CANCER CHARACTERIZATION 32 4.6.1. Summary of Overall Weight of Evidence ................................................................. 32 4.7. SUSCEPTIBLE POPULATIONS AND LIFE STAGES ................................................. 34 4.7.1. Possible Childhood Susceptibility............................................................................. 34 4.7.2. Possible Gender Differences ..................................................................................... 34 4.7.3. Possible Genetic Differences .................................................................................... 34 4.7.4. Possible Sensitive Subgroups - Asthmatics .............................................................. 34 5. DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENTS...................................................................................... 36 5.1. ORAL REFERENCE DOSE (RfD).................................................................................. 36 5.2. INHALATION REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (RFC)............................................ 36 5.2.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect........................................................... 36 5.2.2. Methods of Analysis.................................................................................................. 39 5.2.3. RfC Derivation—Including Application of Uncertainty Factors (UFs).................... 39 5.3. CANCER ASSESSMENT................................................................................................ 42 5.4. GENERAL UNCERTAINTY IN THE PROPIONALDEHYDE NONCANCER AND CANCER ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 42 6. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF HAZARD AND DOSE RESPONSE.............................................................................................................................. 45 6.1. HUMAN HAZARD POTENTIAL................................................................................... 45 6.2. DOSE RESPONSE ........................................................................................................... 47 7. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX A. SUMMARY OF EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENTS AND DISPOSITION ............................................................................................................. A-1 APPENDIX B. BENCHMARK CONCENTRATION MODELING RESULTS...................... B-1 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1. Chemical and physical properties of propionaldehyde ................................................. 3 Table 4-1. Summary of nasal lesion incidence data in female and male rats exposed to various concentrations of propionaldehyde............................................................................................... 11 Table 4-2. Mutagenicity of various aldehydes in Salmonella typhimurium ................................. 13 Table 4-3. Mutagenicity of various aldehydes in mammalian cells ............................................. 16 Table 4-4. Aldehyde-induced chromosome damage in mammalian cells in vitro ....................... 18 Table 4-5. Aldehyde-induced DNA damage in vitro.................................................................... 19 Table 4-6. Effects of inhalation of propionaldehyde on blood pressure and heart....................... 23 Table 4-7. RD50 values for propionaldehyde and selected, related aldehydes measured in B6C3F1 and Swiss-Webster mice............................................................................................................... 27 Table 4-8. Concentration [M] of selected aldehydes required to produce a 50% change from control in each cytotoxic endpoint................................................................................................ 29 Table 5-1. Propionaldehyde References for Exposure-Response Array ...................................... 37 Table 5-2. Summary of general uncertainty in the propionaldehyde noncancer and cancer risk assessments ................................................................................................................................... 42 Table B-1. Olfactory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Octyl Alcohol F Oxo Alcohols
    Octyl alcohol F Oxo alcohols Trade name: Octyl alcohol F Chemical name: Distillation residue, by-products from the production of 2-ethylhexan-1-ol. CN: 3824 90 97 CAS: 68609-68-7 Properties Use Octyl alcohol F is a liquid whose colour varies from yellow, Octyl alcohol F is used as a flotation agent. through brown-yellow to greenish, with a characteristic odour. Product classification Octyl alcohol F is not classified as a hazardous material according to RID/ADR. Physical and chemical properties Parameter Business unit Value Test methods 2-ethylhexanol, not more than % m/m 30 ZAK’s internal rmethod High-molecular compounds >C8, not less than % m/m 70 ZAK’s internal rmethod oxoplast.pl Manufacturer: Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Kędzierzyn S.A. Isobutyraldehyde Trade name: Isobutyraldehyde Chemical name: 2-methylpropanal, isobutyraldehyde, isobutanal CN: 2912 19 00 CAS: 78-84-2 Chemical formula: (CH3)2CHCHO Properties Use Isobutyraldehyde is a transparent, colourless liquid with a char- Isobutyraldehyde is used as a raw material for producing acteristic odour. alcohols, acids, amines, and esters. It is used in processes of manufacturing plasticizers, pharmaceutical products, plant Product classification protection agents, synthetic resins, fragrances, solvents and all sorts of additives used in many branches of industry Isobutyraldehyde is classified as a hazardous material (antioxidants, wetting agents, perfume ingredients, improvers). according to RID/ADR. - RID KI. 3, packing group II - ADR KI. 3, packing group II Physical and chemical properties Parameter Business unit Value Test methods Colour, not more than Pt-Co 15 ISO 6271 Acid number, not more than mg KOH/g 2 ZAK’s internal rmethod N-butyraldehyde, not more than % m/m 0,2* ZAK’s internal rmethod Water, not more than % m/m 1,5 ISO 760 Isobutyraldehyde, not less than % m/m 99,5* ZAK’s internal rmethod * the values do not take into account water content in the product oxoplast.pl Manufacturer: Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Kędzierzyn S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldehydes and Ketones
    12 Aldehydes and Ketones Ethanol from alcoholic beverages is first metabolized to acetaldehyde before being broken down further in the body. The reactivity of the carbonyl group of acetaldehyde allows it to bind to proteins in the body, the products of which lead to tissue damage and organ disease. Inset: A model of acetaldehyde. (Novastock/ Stock Connection/Glow Images) KEY QUESTIONS 12.1 What Are Aldehydes and Ketones? 12.8 What Is Keto–Enol Tautomerism? 12.2 How Are Aldehydes and Ketones Named? 12.9 How Are Aldehydes and Ketones Oxidized? 12.3 What Are the Physical Properties of Aldehydes 12.10 How Are Aldehydes and Ketones Reduced? and Ketones? 12.4 What Is the Most Common Reaction Theme of HOW TO Aldehydes and Ketones? 12.1 How to Predict the Product of a Grignard Reaction 12.5 What Are Grignard Reagents, and How Do They 12.2 How to Determine the Reactants Used to React with Aldehydes and Ketones? Synthesize a Hemiacetal or Acetal 12.6 What Are Hemiacetals and Acetals? 12.7 How Do Aldehydes and Ketones React with CHEMICAL CONNECTIONS Ammonia and Amines? 12A A Green Synthesis of Adipic Acid IN THIS AND several of the following chapters, we study the physical and chemical properties of compounds containing the carbonyl group, C O. Because this group is the functional group of aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids and their derivatives, it is one of the most important functional groups in organic chemistry and in the chemistry of biological systems. The chemical properties of the carbonyl group are straightforward, and an understanding of its characteristic reaction themes leads very quickly to an understanding of a wide variety of organic reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Method 8315A (SW-846): Determination of Carbonyl Compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
    METHOD 8315A DETERMINATION OF CARBONYL COMPOUNDS BY HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC) 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This method provides procedures for the determination of free carbonyl compounds in various matrices by derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH). The method utilizes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) detection to identify and quantitate the target analytes. This method includes two procedures encompassing all aspects of the analysis (extraction to determination of concentration). Procedure 1 is appropriate for the analysis of aqueous, soil and waste samples and stack samples collected by Method 0011. Procedure 2 is appropriate for the analysis of indoor air samples collected by Method 0100. The list of target analytes differs by procedure. The appropriate procedure for each target analyte is listed in the table below. Compound CAS No. a Proc. 1b Proc. 2 b Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 X X Acetone 67-64-1 X Acrolein 107-02-8 X Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 X Butanal (Butyraldehyde) 123-72-8 X X Crotonaldehyde 123-73-9 X X Cyclohexanone 108-94-1 X Decanal 112-31-2 X 2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde 5779-94-2 X Formaldehyde 50-00-0 X X Heptanal 111-71-7 X Hexanal (Hexaldehyde) 66-25-1 X X Isovaleraldehyde 590-86-3 X Nonanal 124-19-6 X Octanal 124-13-0 X Pentanal (Valeraldehyde) 110-62-3 X X Propanal (Propionaldehyde) 123-38-6 X X m-Tolualdehyde 620-23-5 X X o-Tolualdehyde 529-20-4 X p-Tolualdehyde 104-87-0 X a Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR FORMALDEHYDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry July 1999 FORMALDEHYDE ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. FORMALDEHYDE iii UPDATE STATEMENT Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 FORMALDEHYDE vii QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Toxicological Profiles are a unique compilation of toxicological information on a given hazardous substance. Each profile reflects a comprehensive and extensive evaluation, summary, and interpretation of available toxicologic and epidemiologic information on a substance. Health care providers treating patients potentially exposed to hazardous substances will find the following information helpful for fast answers to often-asked questions. Primary Chapters/Sections of Interest Chapter 1: Public Health Statement: The Public Health Statement can be a useful tool for educating patients about possible exposure to a hazardous substance. It explains a substance’s relevant toxicologic properties in a nontechnical, question-and-answer format, and it includes a review of the general health effects observed following exposure. Chapter 2: Health Effects: Specific health effects of a given hazardous compound are reported by route of exposure, by type of health effect (death, systemic, immunologic, reproductive), and by length of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic).
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Di-2-Ethylhexylphthalate May Be a Natural Product, Rather Than a Pollutant
    Hindawi Journal of Chemistry Volume 2018, Article ID 6040814, 7 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6040814 Review Article Di-2-ethylhexylphthalate May Be a Natural Product, Rather than a Pollutant Aurelio Ortiz and Estibaliz Sansinenea Facultad de Ciencias Qu´ımicas, Beneme´rita Universidad Auto´noma de Puebla, C.P. 72570, Puebla, PUE, Mexico Correspondence should be addressed to Estibaliz Sansinenea; [email protected] Received 28 June 2018; Revised 22 August 2018; Accepted 3 September 2018; Published 26 September 2018 Academic Editor: Qizhen Du Copyright © 2018 Aurelio Ortiz and Estibaliz Sansinenea. )is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Di-2-ethylhexylphtalate is an ester of phthalic acid that has been used as plasticizer in many materials. Due to the extended use, it has been persistently found in different environments being classified as a pollutant with some risks for human health. However, in the last years, it has been found that this compound is produced by plants or microorganisms like bacteria or fungi. )is finding opened a serious debate about the origin of this compound and questioned if it is a real pollutant or a natural metabolite with some biological activities that could help us in several ways. )is review tries to give some data of the different points of view about this question. 1. Introduction presence of these compounds in the environment, many reactions have been reported to degrade and transform these Phthalate compounds are colorless liquid chemicals that compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde CASRN 50-00-0
    EPA Document# EPA-740-R-20-014 August 2020 United States Office of Chemical Safety and Environmental Protection Agency Pollution Prevention Final Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde CASRN 50-00-0 August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................6 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................11 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................14 2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION ...................................................................................................14 2.1 Reasonably Available Information ..............................................................................................14 Search of Gray Literature ...................................................................................................... 15 Search of Literature from Publicly Available Databases (Peer-reviewed Literature) ........... 16 Search of TSCA Submissions ................................................................................................ 24 2.2 Conditions of Use ........................................................................................................................25 Conditions of Use
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Impurities in a Methanol Solvent on the Epoxidation of Propylene with Hydrogen Peroxide Over Titanium Silicalite‐1
    Supplementary Materials Influence of Impurities in a Methanol Solvent on the Epoxidation of Propylene with Hydrogen Peroxide over Titanium Silicalite‐1 Gang Wang, Yue Li, Quanren Zhu, Gang Li, Chao Zhang, and Hongchen Guo* State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals and School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, PR China; [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (C.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +86‐411‐84986120 Received: 23 November 2019; Accepted: 18 December 2019; Published: date Table S1. Influence of fusel alcohol content on the product distribution and turnover numbers in epoxidation of propylene with H2O2a Conten Selectivity, % Impurity TONb t, wt.% 1M2Pc 2M1Pc PGc DGMEc PGMEc AAc PAc ATc noned 0.00 314.5 0.50 0.52 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.06 0.00 ethanol 1.00 296.8 0.48 0.46 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.22 0.06 0.00 1.50 286.8 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.26 0.06 0.01 2.00 282.9 0.38 0.42 0.14 0.04 0.02 0.28 0.07 0.01 2.50 267.9 0.38 0.41 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.07 0.01 2‐propanol 0.50 296.8 0.45 0.49 0.17 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.75 286.8 0.43 0.47 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.07 0.05 1.00 282.9 0.41 0.47 0.15 0.04 0.00 0.25 0.08 0.07 1.25 267.9 0.37 0.38 0.14 0.03 0.00 0.26 0.09 0.08 1‐propanol 0.50 297.7 0.51 0.55 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.11 0.00 0.75 289.0 0.45 0.49 0.18 0.05 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 1.00 282.5 0.44 0.49 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.01 1.25 266.0 0.43 0.48 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.26 0.14 0.01 Note: a Reaction conditions: pre‐adsorbed TS‐1 powder 0.4 g, fresh methanol or simulated methanol solvents containing ethanol, 2‐propanol and 1‐propanol 35.5 mL, H2O2 (50 wt.%) 4.5 mL, NH3∙H2O (0.32 mol/L) 0.2 mL, propylene pressure 0.6 MPa, 50 ℃, 1 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Propionaldehyde Pad
    PROPIONALDEHYDE PAD CAUTIONARY RESPONSE INFORMATION 4. FIRE HAZARDS 7. SHIPPING INFORMATION 4.1 Flash Point: 7.1 Grades of Purity: 97-99+% Common Synonyms Liquid Colorless Suffocating, –22°F O.C. 7.2 Storage Temperature: Ambient Methyl acetaldehyde unpleasant odor 4.2 Flammable Limits in Air: 2.6%-16.1% Propanal 7.3 Inert Atmosphere: No requirement 4.3 Fire Extinguishing Agents: Carbon Propionic aldehyde 7.4 Venting: Open (flame arrester) or pressure- dioxide or dry chemical for small fires, Propyl aldehyde Floats and mixes slowly with water. Flammable, irritating vapor is vacuum Propylic aldehyde produced. alcohol-type foam for large fires. 4.4 Fire Extinguishing Agents Not to Be 7.5 IMO Pollution Category: C Used: Water may be ineffective. 7.6 Ship Type: 3 Keep people away. Avoid contact with liquid and vapor. Wear goggles, self-contained breathing apparatus, and rubber overclothing 4.5 Special Hazards of Combustion 7.7 Barge Hull Type: Currently not available (including gloves). Products: Not pertinent Shut off ignition sources and call fire department. 4.6 Behavior in Fire: Vapor is heavier than 8. HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS Stay upwind and use water spray to ``knock down'' vapor. air and may travel considerable distance Notify local health and pollution control agencies. to a source of ignition and flash back. 8.1 49 CFR Category: Flammable liquid Protect water intakes. 4.7 Auto Ignition Temperature: 405°F 8.2 49 CFR Class: 3 4.8 Electrical Hazards: Not pertinent 8.3 49 CFR Package Group: II FLAMMABLE. Fire Flashback along vapor trail may occur. 4.9 Burning Rate: 4.4 mm/min.
    [Show full text]
  • Purification and Properties of the Inducible Coenzyme A-Linked Butyraldehyde Dehydrogenase from Clostridium Acetobutylicum NEIL R
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, JUlY 1988, p. 2971-2976 Vol. 170, No. 7 0021-9193/88/072971-06$02.00/0 Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology Purification and Properties of the Inducible Coenzyme A-Linked Butyraldehyde Dehydrogenase from Clostridium acetobutylicum NEIL R. PALOSAARI* AND PALMER ROGERS Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Received 13 November 1987/Accepted 25 March 1988 The coenzyme A (CoA)-linked butyraldehyde dehydrogenase (BAD) from Clostridium acetobutylicum was characterized and purified to homogeneity. The enzyme was induced over 200-fold, coincident with a shift from an acidogenic to a solventogenic fermentation, during batch culture growth. The increase in enzyme activity was found to require new protein synthesis since induction was blocked by the addition of rifampin and antibody against the purified enzyme showed the appearance of enzyme antigen beginning at the shift of the fermentation and increasing coordinately with the increase in enzyme specific activity. The CoA-linked acetaldehyde dehydrogenase was copurified with BAD during an 89-fold purification, indicating that one enzyme accounts for the synthesis of the two aldehyde intermediates for both butanol and ethanol production. Butanol dehydrogenase activity was clearly separate from the BAD enzyme activity on TEAE cellulose. A molecular weight of 115,000 was determined for the native enzyme, and the enzyme subunit had a molecular weight of 56,000 indicating that the active form is a homodimer. Kinetic constants were determined in both the forward and reverse directions. In the reverse direction both the V,ax and the apparent affinity for butyraldehyde and caproaldehyde were significantly greater than they were for acetaldehyde, while in the forward direction, the Vmax for butyryl-CoA was fivefold that for acetyl-CoA.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey, Emission and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemic…
    Survey of chemical compounds in consumer products Survey no. 36 – 2003 Survey, emission and evaluation of volatile organic chemicals in printed matter Ole Christian Hansen and Torben Eggert Danish Technological Institute 2 Contents PREFACE 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 7 ABBREVIATIONS 11 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 PRINTED MATTER 15 2.1 CONSUMPTION 15 2.2 NUMBER OF ENTERPRISES 16 2.3 PRINTING 16 2.3.1 Printing techniques 16 2.4 PAPER 17 2.5 PRINTING INKS 17 2.5.1 Solvents 18 2.5.2 Binders 19 2.5.3 Wetting agent 19 2.5.4 UV-curing inks 19 2.6 EMISSIONS DURING PRINTING 20 2.7 PRINTED MATTER IN THE HOUSEHOLD 20 2.8 DISPOSAL 21 2.9 RECYCLING 22 3 EXPOSURE 23 3.1 EMISSION MEASURING METHODS 23 3.1.1 Sampling and analyses 23 3.1.2 Screening of volatiles 23 3.1.3 Quantitative measurements 24 3.1.4 Results 25 4 EXPOSURE AND HEALTH EVALUATION 33 4.1 EXPOSURE SCENARIOS 34 4.1.1 Method 34 4.1.2 Scenarios 34 4.2 ASSESSMENT METHOD 35 4.2.1 Assessment method 35 4.2.2 Procedure for assessments 37 5 EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL COMPOUNDS 39 5.1 ALDEHYDES 39 5.1.1 Propanal 39 5.1.2 Pentanal 41 5.1.3 Hexanal 42 5.1.4 Heptanal 43 5.2 ALCOHOLS 44 5.2.1 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 45 5.3 KETONES 46 5.3.1 Heptanone 46 3 5.4 ESTERS 48 5.4.1 Propanoic acid, butylester 48 5.5 FURAN 49 5.5.1 2-Pentylfuran 49 5.6 AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 50 5.6.1 Toluene 50 5.6.2 Xylenes 53 5.6.3 Ethylbenzene 56 5.7 TERPENES 58 5.7.1 alpha-Pinene 58 5.7.2 Camphene 60 5.7.3 Limonene 61 5.7.4 Tetramethyl methenoazulene 63 5.8 ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 64 6 EVALUATION OF PRINTED MATTER 68 6.1 HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED PRINTED MATTER 68 6.1.1 Printed matter no.
    [Show full text]
  • Sids Initial Assessment Profile
    SIAM 31, 20-22 October 2010 BIAC/ICCA SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE CAS No. 123-05-7 Chemical Name 2-Ethylhexaldehyde Structural Formula O=CH-CH(CH2-CH3)-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3 SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS OF THE SIAR Analogue Rationale Several of the health endpoints for 2-ethylhexaldehyde make use of data from 2-ethylhexanol and 2-ethylhexanoic acid experiments. The logic for this “metabolic series” approach includes the metabolism of alcohols (2-ethylhexanol) proceeding via a readily reversible reaction with alcohol dehydrogenase(s) to rapidly form the respective aldehydes (2-ethylhexaldehyde). The aldehydes are short-lived due to the enzymatic activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase that forms the respective organic acids (2-ethylhexanoic acid). Assuming 2-ethylhexaldehyde behaves as other aldehydes, direct exposure to 2-ethylhexaldehyde will result in the rapid formation of both 2 -ethylhexanol and 2-ethylhexanoic acid. The metabolic processes of these two chemicals are well characterized. Toxicity data from studies conducted with 2-ethylhexanol and 2-ethylhexanoic acid have been used to identify the hazards associated with systemic exposure to 2 -ethylhexaldehyde and therefore are useful in identifying hazards associated with 2-ethylhexaldehyde systemic exposures. Structural analogues are used to address several Environmental Hazard endpoints: 2-methyl propionaldehyde (CAS No.78-84-2), 2-ethyl butyraldehyde (CAS No.97-96-1), 2-methyl valeraldehyde (CAS No. 123-15-9), valeraldehyde (CAS No. 110-62-3), hexaldehyde (CAS No.66-25-1), and octylaldehyde (CAS No. 124-13-0). Physical-Chemical Properties 2-Ethylhexaldehyde is a liquid at standard temperature and pressure, with a boiling point of 163 ºC and a melting (freezing) point of <–100 ºC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowtemperature Chemoselective Goldsurfacemediated
    DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200311 Low-Temperature Chemoselective Gold-Surface-Mediated Hydrogenation of Acetone and Propionaldehyde Ming Pan,[a] Zachary D. Pozun,[b] Adrian J. Brush,[a] Graeme Henkelman,[b] and C. Buddie Mullins*[a] Since nanoscale gold was first discovered to be catalytically First, the hydrogenation of acetone was investigated on active,[1] gold-based catalysts have been studied both theoreti- a Au(111) surface. In a control experiment (Figure 1a), 1.62 ML cally[2] and experimentally[3] in a wide range of reactions.[4] (ML= monolayer) of acetone (m/z=43, the most-abundant These catalysts exhibit high activity for hydrogenation process- mass fragment of acetone) was adsorbed onto a clean Au(111) es,[5] in particular showing enhanced selectivity.[6] However, there is a lack of relevant fundamental studies into these pro- cesses. Conducting hydrogenation reactions on model gold surfaces is useful for obtaining mechanistic insight and for fur- ther enhancing our understanding of the catalytic properties of supported-gold catalysts. Herein, we report the chemoselec- tive hydrogenation of aldehydes over ketones on gold surfaces. The hydrogenation chemistry of oxygenated hydrocarbons has been studied on transition-metal surfaces for a variety of reactions that are important to the pharmaceutical- and chemi- cal industries.[7] For example, C=O bond hydrogenation is a key step in the catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass.[8] In addi- tion, gold-based catalysts have also shown exceptional activity for the selective hydrogenation of a,b-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.[9] Claus found that, in the production of allyl alco- hol from the hydrogenation of acrolein, gold catalysts yielded about 10-times-higher selectivity for C=O bond hydrogenation than traditional platinum-based catalysts.[10] Therefore, explor- ing the individual reactivity of carbonyl-hydrogenation could provide useful information for a better holistic understanding of these important catalytic reactions.
    [Show full text]