Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport

Transportation Demand Management Training Document April 2009 About the authors Andrea Broaddus is a Senior Associate with techniques, and make specialised technical Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates in concepts accessible to a larger audience. His Portland, Oregon, USA. Her areas of expertise research is used worldwide in transport plan- include transport demand management, multi- ning and policy analysis. modal planning, and urban redevelopment. She Gopinath Menon has 36 years of experience in holds a Master of Public Policy/ urban transport. He was the Chief Transporta- from the Kennedy School of Government at tion Engineer of Singapore from 1991 to 2001, Harvard University, and was awarded a German when he was working with the Land Transport Chancellor Fellowship by the Alexander von Authority. During his period with the transport Humboldt Foundation in 2006. Her 12 years agencies in Singapore, he has been instrumental of experience working in the environment and in introducing many new concepts in traic transport ield includes 8 years in the non-proit management such as computerised area traic sector with environmental policy advocacy control of traic signals, bus priority measures, groups. While working for the Surface Trans- safety programmes and expressway portation Policy Project in Washington, DC, she surveillance systems. He is an Adjunct Associate also served as a local elected oicial for the city. Professor with the School of Civil and Environ- Todd Litman is founder and executive direc- mental Engineering at the Nanyang Technologi- tor of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, cal University, Singapore. an independent research organisation dedicated he document also counted with a review to developing innovative solutions to transport of earlier drafts from Mr Michael Replogle problems. His work helps to expand the range from Environmental Defense, who was also of impacts and options considered in transpor- instrumental in developing the concept of this tation decision-making, improve evaluation document. Transportation Demand Management Training Document

Authors: Andrea Broaddus, Todd Litman, Gopinath Menon The authors wish to thank Michael Replogle (Environmental Defense) for his comments to early drafts of the document.

Editor: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH P. O. Box 5180 65726 Eschborn, Germany http://www.gtz.de http://www.sutp.org

Division 44 - Water, Energy and Transport Sector Project “Transport Policy Advisory Services”

On behalf of Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113 Bonn, Germany http://www.bmz.de

Manager: Manfred Breithaupt

Editing: Melanie Murphy, Carlosfelipe Pardo, Manfred Breithaupt, Dominik Schmid

Cover photo: Singapore ERP Gantry, Manfred Breithaupt

Layout: Klaus Neumann, SDS, G.C.

Eschborn, April 2009

i ii Preface Cities in developing countries need innovative and efective solutions to solve their transporta- tion problems in the short, medium and long term. Increased economic growth, coupled with a resulting increase in motorisation in recent years, has created greater congestion than has ever been seen in the world. Solutions to these problems are possible, not only through improvement of conditions of and conditions for and users, but also in the implementation of measures which promote a rational use of the automobile by means of Transportation Demand Man- agement (TDM) instruments such as those described in this document. he development of this training document initiated while preparing a training course on TDM in Singapore in partnership with Land Transport Academy (LTA) Singapore and Envi- ronmental Defense, under the Sustainable Urban Mobility for Asia program in March 2008. GTZ has done subsequent training courses on the topic thereafter. Various experts have given their feedback both on the concept of the document as in the initial drafts. he document has been written targeting at developing cities. For those cities which are looking forward to further assist- ance on the topic, GTZ may provide full course material and training courses. Manfred Breithaupt April 2009

iii Table of Contents

Preface iii Introduction 1 1. Challenging traffic growth in developing countries 2 1.1 Impacts of -oriented development 4 1.2 Leapfrogging with TDM 5 2. Developing a comprehensive TDM strategy 8 2.1 Defining TDM 8 2.2 Principles of efficient pricing 10 2.3 Forces driving transport demand 13 2.4 Travel impacts 16 2.5 Types of TDM measures 19 2.6 Developing a comprehensive TDM strategy 23 3. Improving mobility options (“PULL”) 26 3.1 Improving and cycling conditions 26 3.2 Improving public transport service 40 3.3 Car sharing 49 4. Economic measures (“PUSH”) 50 4.1 Controlling car ownership growth 53 4.2 Reducing car use 55 4.3 Supportive measures 74 5. and land use policies (“PUSH and PULL”) 77 5.1 Integrated land use planning 77 5.2 Roadway prioritization and design 83 References 104 Resources 107 Table of Figures 108 Table of Tables 110 Table of Boxes 111

iv Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Introduction Transportation Demand Management (TDM), measures that make other modes of transport also called Travel Demand Management, more attractive. hese are interdependent and aims to maximize the eiciency of the urban need to be paired for maximum efectiveness. transport system by discouraging unnecessary A three-pronged approach, utilizing 1) Improve private vehicle use and promoting more efec- Mobility Options, 2) Economic measures, and tive, healthy and environment-friendly modes of 3) Smart Growth and Land Use Management is transport, in general being public transport and the most efective way to manage demand and non-motorised transport. create a resilient and eicient transport system. TDM can provide many beneits, as summa- his Training Manual is organized as a resource rized in the table below. Conventional transpor- to support comprehensive TDM strategy, help tation planning tends to overlook many of these identify appropriate demand management meas- beneits. For example, transportation agencies ures, and build stakeholder support (Sections 1 tend to evaluate TDM measures primarily on and 2), while providing appropriate examples congestion and pollution emissions, but often (Sections 3 to 5). overlook parking cost savings and safety ben- Section 1 discusses the transport challenges eits. When all impacts (beneits and costs) facing developing countries and the potential are considered, TDM is often the most cost role that TDM measures can play in addressing efective overall transportation improvement these problems. strategy. Moreover, many individual TDM measures may be achieved at relatively low cost, Section 2 gives a theoretical background and so making them especially afordable for cities deines important TDM concepts and terms. with limited inancial resources. Experience has Section 3 describes ways to improve eicient trans- shown that various TDM options and measures portation options, including walking, cycling, should be designed and implemented in a com- ridesharing, public transport and telecommunica- prehensive manner to make sure that the maxi- tions that substitutes for physical travel. mum beneits can be achieved. Section 4 describes various incentives that here are two basic types of measures that encourage the use of eicient mobility options. achieve the goal of improving transport system Section 5 describes smart growth land use poli- eiciency: “Push” measures that make pri- cies that create more accessible, multi-modal vate vehicles less attractive to use, and “Pull” communities. Table 1: Potential TDM planning benefits

Benefits Definition Reduced trafic congestion to motorists, bus users, pedestrians and Congestion reduction cyclists Road cost savings Reduced costs to build, maintain and operate roadway systems Parking savings Reduced parking problems and parking facility costs Consumer savings Transportation cost savings to consumers Improved mobility options Improved mobility options, particularly for non-drivers Road safety Reduced per capita trafic crash risk Energy conservation Reduced per capita energy consumption Emission reductions Reduced per capita pollution emissions Eficient land use More accessible community design, reduced per capita land consumption Public itness and health Increased physical activity and associated health beneits

Transportation demand management can help achieve a wide variety of planning objectives. Not all strategies achieve all of these beneits, but most strategies provide multiple beneits, all of which should be considered in TDM evaluation.

1 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

harm poor people overall. For example, motor- 1. Challenging traffic growth in way expansion can destroy neighbourhoods developing countries and create a barrier to the mobility of people on foot and bicycle. Increased motor vehicle traic TDM is particularly appropriate in develop- ing countries where resources are limited and a major portion of residents rely on walking, cycling, ridesharing and public transport, Road improvements are important for economic development allowing a region to participate in the global economy. However, poorly planned roadway investments can create problems that

Figure 1 High travel demand Figure 3 causes congestion on Dangerous streetcrossing in Kuala roads used by all kinds Lumpur due to lack of crossing options. of motorised and non- Photo by Karl Fjellstrom, Kuala Lumpur (MY), 2001 motorised travel modes, as shown in Pingyao. can increase safety risks for pedestrians and Photo by Armin Wagner, bicyclists. As more road space is given over to Pingyao (CN), 2006 private vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians can Figure 2 get squeezed out, and the performance of public transport vehicles can sufer. Heavy traic in Delhi. Photo by Carlosfelipe Many developed country cities are now working Pardo, Delhi (IN), 2005 to correct such mistakes and encourage people to walk, bicycle and use buses. Developing country can avoid such problems through better policies and planning practices that use TDM to maintain a balanced and eicient transport system, as illustrated in Box 1. TDM policies and programs can balance trans- portation investments and avoid the problems of excessive motorisation that chokes many global cities with traic congestion and pollu- tion. More “hard measures” tend to be utilized in developing countries, that is, measures which have a direct impact upon drivers, such as vehi- cle use restrictions and fees.

2 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 1: Impacts of rapid motorisation as Asia, and particularly the nations of China and in developing countries India. At present, China’s vehicle ownership ratio is nine vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants, (compared Vehicle usage trends have largely followed owner- to Europe with 430, and U.S. with 700). China’s ship trends. Like vehicle ownership, vehicle usage motorisation rate gained another boost with the is expected to grow for both OECD and non-OECD country’s admission into the World Trade Organi- countries, with the highest growth rates in the zation (WTO). In 2005, tariff protection for auto- developing world. mobiles was as high as 80%, but in 2006, China’s The increased usage of motorised vehicles in WTO commitments required that such tariffs be developing nations is a particular concern due to reduced to 25%. the types of vehicles being deployed. In the devel- The trends in car ownership are spurring a oping world, ownership has tended to arrive by spending-spree on road-based infrastructure as way of highly polluting, used vehicles. In countries well. At the end of 2004, China had 34,000 km of such as Peru, the lifting of used vehicle import motorways, more than double from 2000; just 17 restrictions resulted in 70% of the annual growth years ago, the nation had no motorways. Plans in vehicle leet from older, used vehicles (Zegras, are to again double the length of its motorways 1998). An older vehicle leet in conjunction with by 2020. poor maintenance practices and limited vehicle testing can mean that the impacts of motorisation “The profusion of has launched a new on developing nations are many times worse than cultural revolution, transforming Chinese life and an equal level of motorisation in a developed nation. society in ways that bear surprising resemblance The narrower, historical streets found in many to what happened in America 50 years ago… In developing cities also means that even low levels Shanghai the bridges and tunnels crossing the of trafic can translate into heavy congestion. Huangpu River are so congested that a cab ride from one side to the other can be an hour-long In Asia and parts of Africa, the irst progression ordeal” (Chandler, 2003). from non-motorised travel is often towards two- wheel motorised vehicles such as scooters and Many major Chinese cities are also actively motorcycles. “In New Delhi, for example, 45% of discouraging bicycle use through priority meas- particulate emissions and two-thirds of unburned ures for automobiles and through the neglect of hydrocarbon emissions in the transport sector are non-motorised infrastructure. A few Chinese cities estimated to come from two- and three-wheelers have even banned from large sections of powered by two-stroke engines. These are esti- the urban area. In Beijing, non-motorised vehicles mated to emit more than 10 times the amount are increasingly being squeezed by car parking in of ine particulate matter per vehicle-km than a physically segregated lanes, and the reallocation of modern car…” (Gwilliam, 2003, p. 205). space in wide non-motorised vehicle lanes to cars. On the Second Ring Road, the outside half of the In much of the developing world, though, mode non-motorised vehicle lane has been reassigned share is ultimately heading towards four-wheel to cars and the nearside half is used by buses motorised vehicles. The combination of rising and taxis. Bicycle parking at work is increasingly incomes, poor public transport services, and being moved to distant inconvenient locations to lowered import restrictions all means that the provide more convenient space for cars. developing world stands on the cusp of an explo- sion in private vehicle ownership. (Figures have been updated.) Adapted from “: A Sourcebook for Policy- Few regions of the world epitomise the concerns makers in Developing Cities, Module 3e: Car-free Development,” over the global consequences of mass motorisation by Lloyd Wright for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org

3 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 4 1.1 Impacts of car-oriented Figure 5 Despite signiicant development Cars are increasingly replacing two-wheelers investments in car- in the modal mix in developing cities such based infrastructure, Rapid and unconstrained growth of private as Dehli, generating greater congestion. Bangkok has yet to vehicle use in developing cities has real and sig- Photo by Abhay Negi, Delhi (IN), 2005 niicant consequences for cities and the people see any appreciable are poised to repeat — the same mistakes. living in them. Environmental impacts such as reductions in TDM measures ofer an opportunity to avoid congestion. degraded air and water quality soon translate Photo by Karl Fjellstrom the costly and lawed path of car domina- into human impacts such as asthma and prema- tion that developed country cities now try to ture mortality. Cities are often transformed to recover from. Figure 7 discusses some of most make way for cars. New roads replace land used important impacts of unrestrained car-oriented for living space, and new viaducts sever neigh- development. he publication, “Sustainable bourhoods and block non-motorised transport. Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-makers in Although many of these problems are already Developing Cities, Module 3e: Car-free Devel- experienced by developed country cities, many opment” (http://www.sutp.org), contains a more rapidly developing cities are repeating — or detailed discussion.

Figure 6 A parking space instead of a pedestrian path at the roadside forces pedestrians to walk on the street in Shigatse. Photo by Gerhard Metschies, Shigatse (CN), 2002

4 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 7 Air quality Congestion he impacts Vehicle emissions harm Time lost in congestion affects of increasing human health and the natural overall productivity motorisation. environment Source: Adapted from Energy security European Commission (2005) and Litman (2005a) Noise and vibration Dependence on petrol-based Noise affects productivity and mobility affects national health security

Accidents Economic efficiency Each year 1.2 million lives are Financial capital consumed lost due to vehicle accidents by car expenditures reduces capital for other investments Global Vehicles are responsible for Severance roughly 25% of fossil-based Roadways sever communities and inhibit social interactions CO2 emissions

Natural habitats Visual intrusion Roadways disrupt habitats Cars, roads, and parking and open areas to exploitation areas all detract from a city’s beauty Waste disposal The disposal of vehicles and Loss of living space vehicle parts contribute to Roads and parking consume landfill problems large amounts of urban space

Many cities are in the process of recovering the huge maintenance expenses for extensive from a car-dominated development era: remov- road networks grow, and funding for new roads ing motorways that sever communities, reclaim- grows scarce. Developed countries are inding ing road space from cars and re-allocating it to that they simply cannot aford to provide roads buses, bicycles, and pedestrians, and improving free to users forever. public transport network extent, connectivity, and service quality. he movement toward “car- 1.2 Leapfrogging with TDM free cities” is particularly strong in Europe. Developing country cities are well positioned to A trend of capturing the hidden costs of car use skip over, or “leapfrog” an era of car-dominated is emerging in Europe and the U.S. his means development and its expensive impacts. he the full cost of vehicle use is made explicitly irst step is to re-orient transportation policy, clear to drivers, and that they bear a fair share planning, and engineering around the goal of of the burden. he movement is based upon improving access for people and goods. hen the principle that polluters should pay for the a set of TDM measures which both push and impacts of their activities, rather than the least pull drivers out of their vehicles should be powerful in society. For instance, European implemented. he result will be a more sus- Union policy regulating tolls on lorry use will tainable development path, economically and soon require that tolls are calculated to include environmentally. externalized costs, including time delay from Developing cities tend to have high walking, congestion, , accidents, health bicycling, and using public transport mode care costs, and noise. Since most externalities share (that is, the portion of trips made by are non-monetized, considerable research was these forms of transport.) A lower share of the devoted to understanding how to calculate population has access to cars, so expensive them, with the aim of using a common for- car-oriented developments tend to serve only a mula. he greatest driver of this trend is when portion of the population. his tends to increase

5 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 8 Multi-modal planning – bus and bicycle lanes next to a wide sidewalk ensures safety and convenience for diferent users in Xian. Photo by Armin Wagner, Xian (CN), 2006

the feasibility and importance of TDM meas- ures, because many people already depend on alternative modes, and improvements to these modes provide large beneits to users and society overall. TDM is often much less expensive than building new roads, is better for the economy, supports equity objectives, and does more to improve the quality of life. Pricing reforms can be particularly efective at improving transport system eiciency. Besides providing a restraint on excessive car use, taxes and fees paid by driv- ers can be used for investments in public trans- port, street connectivity, and safety measures for non-motorised modes. Box 2 discusses some other reasons TDM measures have multiple beneits in developing countries.

Box 2: TDM is particularly effective in even if they must pay more in private vehicle user developing countries fees. TDM provides opportunities to governments, businesses and individual consumers to save TDM is particularly appropriate in developing money and avoid indirect costs. Investments in country cities, because of its low costs and mul- transportation alternatives and TDM programs tiple beneits. Developing countries have limited are often far more cost effective than continual resources to devote to transportation infrastructure. public investments in road and parking facility Developing country cities often have narrow and expansion to accommodate increased private crowded streets, limited space for parking and a automobile travel. diverse mix of road users, leading to conlicts over space and increased risk of crashes. Few develop- Automobile dependency also tends to be harm- ing countries can afford to build the motorways ful to the national economy of developing coun- and parking facilities that would be needed if tries. Most developing countries import vehicles automobile ownership quickly reaches high levels. and parts, and many import fuel. Even countries A major portion of the population cannot afford to with domestic vehicle assembly plants ind that own private motor vehicles, so investments and the majority of manufacturing inputs are imported policies that favour automobiles over other travel (raw materials, components, technical expertise, modes are likely to be inequitable and unsatisfac- etc.). Vehicles and fuel are the largest category tory for solving most residents’ travel needs. of imported goods in many developing coun- tries. Shifting expenditures from vehicles and fuel Motorway investments sometimes appear more to more locally-produced goods and transport cost effective than alternatives such as public services like public transport and non-motorised transport investments, but this is false economy, transport tends to increase regional employment since roads are just a small part of the total costs. and business activity, supporting economic devel- The total costs of increased automobile depend- opment. Even countries that produce their own ency are far higher than the total costs of providing petroleum are better off conserving fuel so there good public transport service. Most households is more available to export. are better off if their community has an eficient, Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for balanced transportation system with good qual- Policy-makers in Developing Countries, Module 2b: Mobility ity walking, cycling and public transport service, Management,” by Todd Litman for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org

6 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 2: Factors that justify Mobility Management in developing countries

Infrastructure is often in poor repair. Urban roads, parking, sidewalks and paths are often congested and crowded. Infrastructure Streets and sidewalks serve many functions and users (walking, talking, retail supply businesses, sleeping, begging, etc.) Streets not well designed for heavy motor vehicle trafic. Low automobile ownership among general population. Medium to high automobile ownership among middle-income households. Vehicle supply High automobile ownership growth rate among wealthy households. High bicycle ownership in some regions. Medium to high supply of public transit and taxi vehicles. Large variation in mobility between different income groups: low mobility among Personal mobility the general population and high mobility among wealthier groups. High mobility growth rate among medium-income households. Considerable diversity (walking, cycling, animal carts, public transit, private Transportation automobile). diversity Conditions of alternative modes, such as walking, cycling, public transit, are often inferior (slow, uncomfortable, unsafe, unconnected, etc.). Some developing countries have poor civil institutions to plan, implement and enforce trafic improvements. Institutional Sometimes poor cooperation between different levels of government. capacity Most decision-makers are relatively wealthy and so tend to personally favour automobile-oriented improvements. Government costs Limited funding for transportation infrastructure and services. Consumer costs Many households spend a large portion of income on transport. High trafic casualties per motor vehicle. Trafic safety High risk to vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists, animals, etc.). Low comfort levels for non-motorised travel (walking, cycling, animal carts, etc.). Comfort Low comfort levels for most public transit. Medium to high comfort for private automobile and taxi travel. High pollution concentration in urban areas. Environment Pavement of greenspace (farmlands and wildlife habitat) a problem in some areas. Medium to high accessibility in urban areas (many destinations can be reached by walking, cycling and public transit). Land Use Poor and declining accessibility in most and new communities. In some regions, limited land available for new transportation infrastructure. Economic High dependence on imported transportation goods (vehicles, parts and fuel). development Economic development harmed by dependency on imported goods.

7 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

regional and national governments, and private 2. Developing a comprehensive entities like employers. Table 3 contrasts supply- TDM strategy and demand-side measures which may be used in a transportation system. 2.1 Defining TDM Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Motorways and bypasses generate is a strategy which aims to maximize the ei- traic, that is, produce extra traic, ciency of the urban transport system by dis- couraging unnecessary private vehicle use and partly by inducing people to travel promoting more efective, healthy and environ- who would not otherwise have done mental-friendly modes of transport, in general so by making the new route more being public transport and non-motorised transport. convenient than the old, partly by To better understand the economic beneits people who go out of their direct resulting from TDM, it is helpful to consider route to enjoy the greater convenience transportation as a good for which there is of the new road, and partly by supply and demand. Transportation agencies are responsible for designing, building, and people who use the towns bypassed, managing road network and transport services, because they are more convenient and for regulating vehicles. heir policies and for shopping and visits when planning practices usually based on the assump- tion that the goal is to maximize supply in through traic has been removed. J.J. Leeming, British road engineer, order to increase motor vehicle traic volumes “Road Accidents: prevent or punish?”(1969) and speeds. Supply is relatively easy to meas- ure, indicated by the number of kilometres of TDM can also be described as set of measures paid roads, parking spaces, motor vehicles, and to inluence traveller behaviour in order to vehicle kilometres of travel. Transport demand reduce or redistribute travel demand. Demand is more diicult to measure, because it is based for transportation follows the general economic upon peoples’ needs and desire for mobility, and theory of supply and demand for normal goods. the needs of businesses to transport goods. For most goods, supply and demand are bal- It is also less clear who is responsible for man- anced by pricing. For example, if demand aging demand, since transport decisions are increases for a particular type of food, the price based on a variety of factors, from time of day will rise, stimulating farmers to supply more, to comfort to cost. TDM measures may be until supply and demand achieves equilibrium. implemented by transportation agencies, local, However, many components of the transporta- Table 3: Examples of transport system management measures tion system are ineiciently priced, creating conlicts and ineiciencies. Increase Supply Demand Management Although automobiles are expensive to own, Add roads and road lanes Road/ most of the costs are ixed. Consumers pay More bus service Fuel pricing about the same for vehicle purchase, inancing, More light rail service Parking policies and pricing insurance, registration and residential parking More commuter rail service Vehicle use restrictions regardless of how much they drive their vehicle. More frequent bus service Road space reallocation Many costs of automobile travel are external, Priority for bus and non-motorised that is, not paid directly by users, including Dedicated bus or tram corridors modes traic congestion, accident risk, pollution emis- Bike lanes and bike parking Clustered land uses sions and parking subsidies. Many countries Flexible work hours and Sidewalks and crosswalks subsidize motor vehicle fuel, or impose low taxes telecommuting that do not even recover roadway costs. In most Bridges and tunnels for bicyclists Travel planning information situations, two-thirds of motor vehicle costs are and pedestrians either ixed or external.

8 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

his price structure is ineicient and unfair. High ixed costs encourages motorists to maxi- more mize their vehicle travel, in order to get their car traffic money’s worth, and externalized costs are ineq- uitable, forcing people to bear uncompensated shift from pedestrian costs and damages. For instance, and to car traffic bus passengers are delayed by traic congestion, although they require far less road space than private automobile passengers. TDM helps cor- car traffic rect these distortions, resulting in a more ei- cient and equitable transportation system. his land use for roads reduced ultimately beneits everybody, including people attraction of who continue to drive, because they can enjoy pedestrian and bicycle traffic less traic and parking congestion, reduced and reduced access to emissions, accident and pollution costs, and reduced need public transport noise, to chaufeur non-drivers. accidents TDM tends to be particularly beneicial when traffic compared with the full costs of expanding con- increase gested and unpriced roads and parking facilities. Expanding such facilities tends to stimulate generated traic (additional peak-period traf- increased distances ic on the expanded roadway, including vehicle - within residential areas - to workplaces travel shifted from other times and routes), - to leisure areas and induced travel (a total increase in motor = need for more transportation vehicle travel, including travel shifted from other modes, more distant destinations, and total increases in per capita mileage). Generated is consumed for roadways, homes and destina- Figure 9 traic and induced vehicle travel tend to reduce tions tend to be farther apart, leading people to he vicious cycle of predicted congestion beneits and increase use vehicles for more and more of their trips. increasing car use. external costs, including downstream traic his feedback cycle between transportation and congestion and roadway costs, parking costs, land use is illustrated in Figure 9. Cities tend traic accidents, energy consumption, pollution to grow larger and more spread out, in a pat- emissions, and land use sprawl. Although the tern called . TDM helps stop this additional vehicle travel provides user beneits, cycle by supporting “Smart Growth” land use these are small, because such travel represents development patterns which create more com- the marginal value vehicle-miles that consumers most willingly give up if their costs increase. pact, multi-modal communities and discourage sprawl. Because conventional economic evaluation tends to overlook or undervalue generated traic TDM is not simply about implementing meas- and induced travel impacts, it tends to exagger- ures to improve mobility and reduce emissions, ate the beneits of expanding congested urban but also sending a message to all transport users roadways, and undervalue TDM solutions. that resources related to transport (road and More comprehensive evaluation, which takes parking space, fuel, time, public investment) are these factors into account, tends to recognize scarce and very valuable, and that social equity more beneits from TDM solutions. comes irst. An adjustment in transport prices is long overdue and TDM provides a set of meas- TDM also afects land use patterns, due to the reciprocal relationship between land use and ures which address those concerns. transportation. Land use afects transportation Regarding reduced travel, please see a technical activity, and transportation decisions afect paper from GTZ, which will be uploaded to land use development patterns. As more land http://www.sutp.org by May 2009.

9 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 10 TDM as an integral part of urban The challenges in urban transport and TDM transport planning.

Transport Demand Management shall

• reduce the total volume of trafic • Urban areas require proper road networks • promote shifts towards more sustainable modes of transport • New roads attract more trafic and reduce the viability of public with the objectives to transport

• Transport beneits will • reduce trafic congestion be offset by future congestion • reduce adverse effects on the environment or public health

• generate additional revenue to improve public transport and NMT by pricing mechanisms

2.2 Principles of efficient pricing example, implementing road or parking pric- Pricing can be an efective way to address trans- ing in a corridor may have little efect on traf- portation problems and increase transportation ic volumes if travellers have no viable alter- Figure 11 system eiciency, but to be efective, prices must natives such as high quality public transport A bus stuck in heavy relect the following principles: serving that corridor. Hanoi traic makes 1. Consumer options. Consumers must have 2. Cost-based prices. To be eicient, prices public transport less viable options from which to choose, so they (what consumers pay for a good) should attractive to users. can select the combination of quantity, qual- relect the incremental costs of producing Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Hanoi (VN), 2006 ity and price that best meets their needs. For that good, including direct and indirect costs of production, distribution and disposal. 3. Economic neutrality. his means that public policies treat comparable goods equally, unless there is a speciic justiication for spe- cial treatment. It means, for example, that policies should not favour automobile travel over other modes in terms of investments, regulations or subsidies. Current transportation policies and planning practices are distorted in various ways that result in economically excessive motor vehicle travel, inferior travel options, and sprawled land use. Most costs of automobile travel are either ixed or external. Once the up-front investment is made to purchase a vehicle, there is an incen- tive to use it. When using a vehicle, drivers bear the cost of fuel and their own time, but they also impose congestion, accident, pollution, and infrastructure costs on others.

10 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 3: adjusted) price of vehicle fuel has declined signiicantly, and How sensitive is driving to price? vehicle-operating eficiency has increased. Real fuel costs are now a third lower, and an average car is nearly twice as Economists have plenty of solid research showing that prices eficient. Residents of countries with high fuel taxes tend to affect travel behaviour, but non-economists often cite anecdotal purchase more fuel-eficient vehicles and drive fewer annual evidence that travel is insensitive to price, and so argue that miles per capita. For example, fuel taxes are about 8 times price reforms are an ineffective way to affect travel behaviour. higher in the U.K. than in the U.S., resulting in fuel prices that For example, they will point to a news article showing that a are about three times higher. U.K. vehicles are about twice recent jump in fuel prices had little effect on automobile use, as fuel eficient, on average, so per-mile fuel costs are only or data showing that people who live in countries with high about 1.5 times higher, and automobiles are driven about 20% fuel taxes continue to drive automobiles. “Motorists love their less per year, so annual fuel costs are only 1.25 higher than cars too much, they won’t give them up,” goes the claim. Such in the U.S. Similar patterns can be found when comparing claims are partly true and largely false. other countries with different fuel prices. This indicates that As it is usually measured, automobile travel is inelastic, automobile use is sensitive to price. meaning that a percentage price change causes a proportion- The relatively low elasticity of driving with respect to fuel ally smaller change in vehicle mileage. For example, a 10% fuel prices hides a much higher overall elasticity of driving. Fuel price increase only reduces automobile use by about 1% in the is only about a quarter of the total cost of driving. The price short run and 3% over the medium run. Even a 50% fuel price sensitivity of driving is more evident when measured with increase, which seems huge to consumers, will generally only respect to parking fees and tolls. A modest parking fee or reduce vehicle mileage by about 5% in the short run, a change road toll can have a major effect on travel demand. Some too small for most people to notice, although this will increase of this relects changes in destination and route, but it also over time as consumers take the higher price into account in includes changes in mode and travel distance (Pratt, 1999). longer-term decisions, such as where to live or work. When per-mile or per-trip costs increase, motorists tend to But fuel prices are a poor indicator of the elasticity of driving, drive less and rely more on other modes. because over the long term consumers will purchase more fuel- Table 4 below summarizes the impacts of various types of eficient vehicles. Over the last few decades the real (inlation pricing changes on car ownership and car use.

Table 4: Impacts of different types of pricing

Vehicle Fuel Fixed Congestion Parking Transit Type of impact fees Prices toll pricing fee fares Vehicle ownership. Consumers change the number of the vehicles they own.    Vehicle type. Motorist chooses different vehicle (more fuel eficient, alternative fuel, etc.)   Route Change. Traveller shifts travel route.    Time change. Motorist shifts trip to off-peak periods.  

Mode shift. Traveller shifts to another mode.     

Destination change. Motorist shifts trip to alternative destination.      . People take fewer total trips (including consolidating trips.)     Land use changes. Changes in location decisions, such as where to live and work.   

Different price changes have different impacts on travel behaviour. Adapted from Todd Litman, “Transportation Elasticities,” 2007, http://www.vtpi.org

11 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 4: The rationale for TDM „„more pollution than would be the case with smoothly lowing trafic, Scarce road space is currently usually allocated „„signiicant negative impacts on the viability through queuing. The total costs of a motorised of more eficient modes of public transport, trip generally far exceed the individual costs borne walking, and cycling, by the vehicle occupants, especially in congested dispersal of journeys to outlying city areas urban settings where the marginal costs of car use „„ where current congestion is lower but to where are high. This externalization of costs and inef- it is likely to spread. icient allocation of road space results in worse congestion than would be the case under a pric- The basis for demand management is that ing system where car users paid a more realistic unless the price directly incurred by travellers price for their travel. Impacts of resulting urban in making journeys covers the full costs of the congestion include: journey, their travel will impose a net cost on the community. „„loss of time, and increased vehicle operating Photo from Nordrhein-Westfalen/Germany costs, TDM promotes eficient use of street space

For example, although users may pay vehicle vehicles, such as buses, are stuck in traic along registration fees and fuel taxes that help inance with space intensive vehicles such as private roadway facilities these are not “eicient” prices automobiles, so there is no incentive to use this that relect the full marginal cost of each trip. space eicient mode. he result is an example As a result, problems such as traic and parking of a “tragedy of the commons,” in which com- congestion, excessive accident risk, and pollu- petition for resources (in this case, road space) tion emissions are virtually inevitable. his is makes everybody worse of overall. ineicient and unfair, because space eicient

12 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

that are highest during congested periods) give “Underpricing increases automobile travellers an incentive to change when and how dependency and reduces travel choices, they travel to avoid peak-period automobile which is unfair to non-drivers trips when they can. Consumers can choose to drive during a peak period when they are will- and reduces the transport system’s ing to pay the extra inancial cost, but they are overall eiciency. Using automobiles rewarded with faster travel time. for relatively short urban trips is 2.3 Forces driving transport demand a sub-optimal use of technology Before any discussion on selected TDM meas- that exacerbates urban problems. ures, it is important to understand the driving Underpricing encourages automobile forces behind transport sector trends. As policy use for trips when more eicient challenges are identiied, the appropriate policy solutions may be developed. alternatives such as walking, cycling, In order to evaluate TDM measures it is useful small low powered vehicles, and to consider various factors that afect travel local buses are more appropriate.” demand and therefore inluence travel behav- British transportation planner H. Dimitriou, iour. hese factors include: “Urban Transport Planning: A Developmental Approach” (1992) „„Household wealth and vehicle ownership „„Road and parking facility supply and quality A second problem is that drivers only bear a „„Prices (for fuel, road use, parking, transit portion of the costs of vehicle use — some costs fares) are imposed upon other drivers, but many costs „„he relative speed, convenience and com- are imposed upon society in general. Costs not fort of travel by private vehicle and public borne directly by users are called external costs, transport Figure 12 (or externalities, also called “hidden costs”). „„Walking and cycling conditions Transportation externalities include conges- A highway interchange „„Land use patterns (the distribution of creates a barrier to tion, accidents, emissions and pollution, noise, destinations) non-motorised traic and aesthetic factors which all negatively afect „„Traveller habits and expectations in Beijing. Such people and/or future generations. he external As households become wealthier they are car planning also costs of transport can add up to be a signiicant increasingly able to own and operate motor eliminated living drag on the national economy, particularly in vehicles (including motorcycles and automo- space in the city. Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, developing countries, as shown in Box 4. biles). Unless special efort is made to preserve Beijing (CN), 2007 While externalized costs may account for about 3% to 5% of GDP in Europe and the U.S., they can account for as much as 10% of developing country GDP, (Breithaupt, 2000). One study at the University of California looked at transpor- tation expenditures by people and public agen- cies over the ten-year period from 1990–2000. Drivers paid direct costs for road use amounting to US$600 to US$1,000 per vehicle per year, yet they imposed externalized non-monetary costs upon society ranging from US$400 to US$4,000; the social cost of motorway trans- portation was calculated to be US$8,800 to US$17,400 per vehicle per year. (Delucci, 1998). Eicient pricing gives consumers incentives to choose the most eicient options for each trip. For example, congestion pricing (road tolls

13 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

travel options and manage travel demand, this Many current trends point toward TDM as a can result in increasing traic problems, which solution, including increasing urban traic and ultimately makes everybody worse of overall. parking congestion, rising facility construc- As the amount of land consumed for roads and tion costs, aging population, rising fuel prices, parking grows, space for people to live, walk, increasing environmental concerns, increasing and use bicycles for transport shrinks. With health concerns, equity objectives, and chang- more cars crowding the roads, accidents increase ing consumer preferences. Although each and air quality deteriorates. Communities that geographic region faces its own unique set of fail to invest in comfortable and high frequency problems and development goals, many of these public transport become trapped in a vicious support increased application of TDM meas- cycle where people lee rickety and unreliable ures as they bring beneits to both individuals buses for higher status cars. hose who can, lee and society. cities to suburbs resulting in urban sprawl. his Some of the key trends are (Replogle, 2008): process can occur rapidly, shifting a community „„Rising motorisation. Increasing individual from being multi-modal (where consumers have wealth results not only in higher car owner- a variety of functional travel options) to auto- ship, but also more sprawling settlements as mobile dependent (where the transport system people move to larger and higher quality resi- is dominated by automobile traic) in just a dences that require more frequent and longer few years. Communities divided by corridors of travel. his makes private car use more attrac- fast-moving cars become socially segregated and tive and public transport less convenient. the mobility of those reliant on non-motorised „„Growing traffic congestion. Increasing traf- modes becomes increasingly restricted. ic congestion may result in dispersion and relocation of businesses to the urban edge. “Traic growth outpaces population Declining accessibility to businesses and and job growth, but expanding public institutions reduces not only quality of life but also the economic performance of roads fails to yield long-term relief, cities. because it induces more traic. „„Declining economic competitiveness. As Transportation demand management economic activities shift to the service sector, travel patterns become more dispersed, i.e. recognizes that travel demand is the peak demand decreases and the number not a given, but is a function of of origins and destinations increases result- transportation policies, pricing, ing in lower economic feasibility of public transport. investments and choices.” „„Public health and safety. More vehicles Michael Replogle, transportation engineer and expert for Environmental Defense moving at higher speeds leads to more fre- quent and more severe accidents, and more hese trends impose large economic, social fatalities. High concentrations of vehicle and environmental costs, including increased emissions, particularly particulate matter traic congestion costs, increasing road and from diesel combustion, are related to parking facility costs, increased consumer increasing cases of asthma and pulmonary costs, more crashes, increased energy consump- disorders. Lifestyle changes resulting from tion, increased pollution emissions, sprawled more time spent in cars leads to higher rates land use, reduced mobility options for non- of obesity. drivers, and reduced public itness and health. „„Social segregation. he gap between high Described diferently, policies that improve income, high mobility citizens and others travel options and reduce urban vehicle traf- tends to grow with increasing motorisation. ic volumes and speeds provide many beneits As lower income citizens lose access to jobs, to users, businesses, the economy, and the goods, and services, mobility becomes a environment. matter of social equity.

14 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 13: Driving forces behind transport trends Driving Trends in transport Transport Demand Policy Trends in transport sector forces sector Management Strategies challenges LOCAL Deteriorating Economic Vehicle ownership  Number of accidents  health growth conditions

Vehicle use  Reduce/avoid need to Local air quality  travel, to move goods Land Declining Larger vehicles  Shift to environmentally Trafic congestion  availability   accessibility friendly modes Sprawl  Noise  Social equity Promote compact growth patterns Burdens on the poor  Increasing Housing needs Operating 2 individual (m /inhabitant)  Capture full cost of Capital funds  conditions of wealth driving from users public transport Expectations of comfort  Operating funds  Non-motorised transport Leisure time  (NMT) marginaliszed  INTERNATIONAL Increasing Globalisation Fuel consumption  Fuel prices  energy demand Promote sustainable development Urbanisation Transport supply  CO2 emissions  Climate change  Promote uptake of  carbon dioxide (CO2 Competition reduction technologies for foreign investment Improve system and tourism eficiency

A variety of trends are increasing automobile ownership and use, which imposes economic, social and environmental costs. Transportation demand management can increase transport system eficiency, reducing costs and increasing beneits to individuals and communities.

„„Climate change. Motorisation and sprawling and Great Britain are improving walking and growth results in more fuel consumption and cycling facilities and public transport services, vehicle emissions which contribute to global implementing road and parking pricing to warming. encourage use of alternative modes, and apply- Although motorisation is increasing in many ing smart growth land use policies to create developing countries, it is possible to avoid more compact, walkable communities. Where automobile dependency, that is, excessive auto- these policies have been efectively applied, mobile use and a decline in the quality of travel has shifted from automobile to alterna- transport options. Many developed countries tive modes. are now applying TDM policies to improve TDM policies have a number of justiications, travel options and encourage the use of eicient including to address traic and parking con- modes, resulting in the best of all worlds, a gestion problems, energy and environmental diverse transportation system in which people concerns, public health concerns, and a desire use the optimal mode for each trip. For exam- to create a more equitable transportation system ple, many higher income countries such as the that serves the needs of transportation disadvan- Netherlands, Sweden, Germany, Swizerland taged people.

15 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

2.4 Travel impacts We Can’t Build Our Way Out of Congestion TDM measures work in various ways with a Transportation systems worldwide are undergoing a shift variety of impacts. Not all TDM measures from supply side techniques to demand management afect travel directly. Some provide a foundation for other strategies that change travel behaviour, Supply side Demand side which in turn have various economic, social and HOV Parking environmental impacts. hese relationships are New Area lanes control highways license illustrated below. Adding or fee lanes Congestion Policies charges (planning and investment practices, Public Cordon land use practices, tax policies, etc.) transport tolls improvements HOT Taxation lanes  Public transport policy Toll roads priority Programs and projects (commute trip reduction, transportation Adapted from Derek Turner Consulting management associations, non-motorised transport planning, parking management, Figure 14 school and campus trip management, etc.) Paradigm shift from supply side measures to demand management.  “Supply side refers to the construction Measures that directly affect travel behaviour of roads and parking facilities. (parking cash out, congestion pricing, tran- Although building a basic roadway sit improvements, improved walking and system provides signiicant cycling conditions, lextime, location eicient mortgages, higher parking fees, etc.) economic and social beneits, once that system becomes congested it  is usually more cost efective and Travel impacts beneicial overall to address this (mode shifts, shifts in trip scheduling, shorter trip distances, reduced driving, problem with demand management increased load factors, etc.) programs that result in more eicient use of available capacity.”  Beneits (improved mobility and access, cleaner air, road safety, road and parking facility cost savings, consumer savings, etc.)

TDM measures afect travel behaviour in vari- ous ways. An individual may change their route, mode of travel, and time of day for making their trip in response to TDM measures. A person may also travel less frequently, and choose closer destinations. When many individuals change their travel behaviour in these ways, large- scale impacts are seen, such as reduced traic congestion, compact land use patterns and

16 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 5: Examples of TDM travel impacts

TDM Measure Mechanism Travel changes Reduces trafic speeds, improves Trafic calming Roadway design pedestrian conditions Flexible work hours Improved transport choice Shifts travel time (when trips occur) Shifts travel time, reduces vehicle Road/congestion pricing Pricing travel on a particular roadway Distance-based charges Pricing Reduces overall vehicle travel Transit improvements Improved transport choice Shifts mode, increases transit use Ridesharing (carpool, Increases vehicle occupancy, reduces Improved transport choice vanpool) vehicle trips Pedestrian and bicycle Improved transport choice, Shifts mode, increases walking and improvements roadway design cycling Carsharing Improved transport choice Reduces vehicle ownership and trips Compact land use (Smart Shifts mode, reduces vehicle Improved transport choice Growth) ownership and trip distances

Different types of TDM measures cause different types of travel changes. viable public transport. Table 5 summarizes the can account factors such as land use density and travel changes that result from various TDM mix. However, many TDM programs include measures. strategies that are diicult to model, such as Models can help predict the travel impacts of pedestrian service improvements and direct various TDM measures. For example, most marketing programs, and so tend to overlook conventional four-step urban traic models can and undervalue comprehensive TDM programs. predict the efects of increased transit service Diferent types of travel changes can help and road pricing, and spezialised models such as achieve diferent types of planning objectives. TRIMMS (Trip Reduction Impacts of Mobility For example, a TDM measure that shifts travel Management Strategies) can predict the travel from peak to of-peak periods has diferent impacts of a commute trip reduction program, beneits and costs than a TDM measure that taking into account geographic location and shifts travel modes. Table 6 shows which objec- the program features (http://www.nctr.usf.edu/ tives are achieved by diferent types of travel abstracts/abs77704.htm). Some newer models behaviour changes.

Table 6: Benefits of different types of travel changes

Reduced Reduced Reduced Shift trip Shorter Shift Planning Objectives traffic vehicle vehicle time trips mode speeds trips ownership Congestion reduction      Road savings     Parking savings    Consumer savings     Improved mobility options    Road safety      Energy conservation     Emission reductions    Eficient land use     Public itness and health      Different types of travel changes help achieve different planning objectives.

17 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Transportation demand management allows „„Shaping travel mode choices to support economic development and prosperity with- broader policy goals. Many TDM measures out ever-growing motor vehicle traic and the meet multiple policy goals, such as improving problems it would cause, helping to create a environmental quality and public health. truly sustainable economy. For example, Singa- „„Promoting more efficient trip choices. pore and Hong Kong have seen personal wealth Making the cost of travel more apparent to grow while motor vehicle ownership remained the transport system user results in more steady. his is attributed to the thoughtful eicient system use patterns and the elimina- policy and investment changes that each city tion of unnecessary trips, which can enhance has made in providing high quality alterna- economic competitiveness. tives to driving, such as high frequency public „„Reducing unnecessary motor vehicle travel. transport. Providing safe and pleasant travel options, as well as ensuring that new development Demand for travel is largely a function of the improves connectivity between homes and des- transportation options developed through the tinations, shift trips from cars to other modes. policy and investment decisions of govern- „„Reducing trip lengths. Promotion of com- ments. A comprehensive TDM strategy may be pact development patterns helps conserve adopted as part of meeting broader policy goals land for agriculture and environmental qual- for a nation. ity and enables more eicient transportation Policy objectives of TDM may include, resulting in higher accessibility with less (Replogle, 2008): mobility. Figure 15: TDM as part of a sustainable transportation system

PLANNIING REGULATORY ECONOMIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS Land use planning Standards (emissions limits, Fuel taxes, road pricing, Public Awareness Campaigns, Fuel improvement, (master planning) safety), trac organisation subsidies, purchase taxes, mobility management cleaner technologies, (speed limits, parking, fees and levies, and marketing schemes, end-of-pipe control devices, road space allocation), emissions trading co-operative agreements, cleaner production production processes eco-driving schemes

Economic instruments can be The provision of information, in Planning can reduce the need Regulatory measures can be used to discourage the use of easily accessible formats can to travel through bringing used to restrict the use of motorised vehicles, which will Where travel by motorised increase the awareness of people and the activities they certain motorised vehicles, but encourage the use of transport is necessary, alternative modes, leading to a need to access closer together. also in uence the types of alternative modes, or reduce technology can be used to mode shift to walking or Planning can also enable the vehicles used and standards the need to travel. Instruments reduce the impact of carbon cycling. Information can also implementation of new that they should adhere to can also improve accessibility emissions, through developing be provided related to transport infrastructure (road, (both in terms of vehicle and mobility for those without a cleaner fuels and improving improving driver behaviour, rail, other public transport, performance and road private vehicle, through vehicle eciency. resulting in reduced fuel cycling and walking). regulations). investment in transport. consumption. infrastructure.

Reduced Carbon Emissions

18 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

2.5 Types of TDM measures TDM increases transport system eiciency by providing various incentives for individuals to change their travel time, route, mode, destina- tion, frequency, and cost. People who choose more eicient options are rewarded with ben- eits, while people who continue with ineicient travel bear additional costs. his can provide signiicant savings and beneits, making every- body better of overall. TDM focuses on access to services and activi- ties, rather than vehicle traic. his can greatly expand the range of solutions that can be applied to a particular transportation problem. For example, if a road or parking facility is con- gested at certain times, rather than expanding roads and parking facilities, TDM may encour- age some people to shift from peak to of-peak periods, to travel by alternative modes (walking, monitored to gauge acceptance. here are many Figure 16 cycling, ridesharing, public transport), to choose ways that private sector stakeholders such as Congested street alternative destinations, or to park ofsite at irms and individuals can make TDM measures in Bangkok. Cars, another parking lot. more efective. Private-sector TDM measures motorbikes and buses are stuck in traic Because TDM measures seek to inluence which complement government eforts include encouraging businesses such as car-sharing, most of the day. behaviour they may involve a variety of Photo by Thirayoot Limanond, and cooperative agreements which engage large Bangkok (TH), 2006 stakeholders, not just transportation agencies. employers in their own awareness-raising and For example, a TDM program might involve incentive schemes for employees. regional governments (which plan roads and major transit systems), local governments (which It is helpful to categorize TDM measures in build sidewalks and bike paths, and mange terms of their approach and the stakeholders public parking), businesses (which manage that need to be involved in implementation, as employee and customer parking), and commu- shown in Table 7. his document divides TDM nity organisations (which promote healthy and measures into three basic groupings: 1) Improve environmentally responsible behaviour). Mobility Options, 2) Economic Measures, 3) Smart Growth and Land Use Policies. Various policy and planning reforms are needed to help implement speciic TDM measures. hese can occur at various political and admin- istrative levels. A policy refers to a goal, strategy or priority declared by a political body that guides decision making and resource alloca- tion. A regulatory measure administratively sets standards and procedures, sometimes referred to as a “command and control” approach. Policy and regulatory measures may be implemented by many levels of government. Enforcement and public awareness are criti- cal supportive eforts to the successful impe- lementation of TDM measures. Information services should be ofered to assist with behav- iour change, and public opinion should be

19 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 7: Types of TDM measures

TDM Measure Implemented by Key Stakeholders Improve Mobility Options City, State, National governments, transit Children and older (walking and cycling facilities; service and shared bicycle service adults, individuals with rideshare and public transport operators disabilities, low income services) individuals Economic Measures City, State, National governments, private Large employers, (inancial incentives to use companies (as employers), toll road and freight haulers, low eficient modes) parking facility operators income individuals,

Smart Growth and Land Use City, State, National governments, Real estate developers, Policies (development policy developers, households (when they select large employers, home to create more accessible and a home) and businesses (when they select buyers multi-modal communities) a building location)

This table summarizes various categories of TDM measures, organisations responsible for implementing them, and key stakeholders who are affected.

Table 8 lists various examples of measures in improvements may include a variety of speciic these three basic categories. Many of these have measures that improve transit travel conven- additional subcategories. For example, transit ience, comfort, security and afordability.

Table 8: Examples of TDM measures

Improve Transport Smart Growth and Other Economic Measures Options Land Use Policies Programs Public transit improvements Congestion pricing Smart growth School and campus Walking and cycling Distance-based fees Transit-oriented transport manage- ment improvements Commuter inancial development Mobility management incentives Location-eficient Freight transport management marketing programs Parking pricing development Tourist transport Rideshare/commute trip Parking regulations Parking management reduction programs management Fuel tax increases Car-free planning HOV priority lanes Transit encouragement Trafic calming Flextime/telecommuting Transport planning Carsharing services reforms Taxi service improvements Guaranteed ride home program Shared bicycle services

This table lists various TDM measures, adapted from VTPI (2006). More explanation and further examples may be found at http://www.vtpi.org. 2.5.1 Improving mobility options Many of these measures involve physical design A variety of speciic actions can improve the changes, such as reconiguring streets or inter- relative availability, convenience, speed, com- sections. Some increase the capacity or comfort fort, and security of alternative modes, includ- of the transport system, such as adding more ing walking, bicycling, ridesharing (carpooling transit services or improving transit stops and and vanpooling), public transport, carsharing. stations. Some involve new services or programs, Implementation actions can include building such rideshare matching or policies that allow new or improved transportation facilities, regu- employees to telecommute. hey may be imple- latory changes that favour alternative modes, mented by transportation and planning agen- and the provision of new services and programs. cies, private contractors, community organisa- tions, or private businesses.

20 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 5: Improving accessibility more quickly may be overlooked. Mobility plan- There is an important distinction to be made ning puts vehicles in conlict with non-motorised regarding how the performance of the transpor- modes, while accessibility planning tends to create tation system is evaluated, whether for mobility synergies. and accessibility: Accessibility prioritizes the movement of people Mobility Prioritizing the eficient move- and goods. The emphasis is on the outcomes ment of vehicles, using physical and performance of the transport system. When (technical) solutions to improve policy, planning and engineering are focused on modal level of service; improving access, a wide variety of investments Accessibility Prioritizing the eficient move- are made — not just roads. Accessibility planning ment of people and goods, using may begin by measuring how long it takes to travel solutions that change behaviour to a city centre or a major employment destination. to encourage mode shift. A “time isochrone map” may be a starting point, When mobility is the priority, transportation plan- showing which areas have the longest travel time ning, policy and engineering is focused on ways to by public transport, and identifying major barriers improve the transport system to increase vehicle to bicycle and pedestrian trafic (like wide or busy volumes and speeds. That is, the emphasis of roads). Then targeted solutions may be developed, transport investments is on moving more vehicles such as new transit or shuttle bus service. more quickly. This is the mindset which produces For more discussion on this issue see Todd the car-dominated cities. By focusing on vehicles, Litman, “Evaluating Accessibility” the most eficient solutions for moving more people (http://www.vtpi.org/access.pdf).

Figure 17 Lane exclusively for buses during peak hours ensures eicient operation and better service in Shanghai. Photo by Armin Wagner, Shanghai (CN), 2006

21 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

2.5.2 Economic measures driven, and that vehicle users should pay pol- Various economic and regulatory measures can lution emission fees. Full cost transportation encourage travellers to use the most eicient pricing tends to be the most fair and eicient option for each trip. hese can include pricing policy (unless a subsidy is speciically justiied (e.g. road, parking, fuel and public transport on equity grounds or to achieve strategic plan- prices and taxes), and regulatory instruments ning objectives). It gives consumers an incentive which control the availability of goods, which to use transportation resources eiciently, for may afect market prices (e.g. minimum parking example, by preventing society from devoting requirements in codes that reduce park- US$10.00 to pay for roads and parking facilities ing prices, and emission auction schemes that to accommodate a trip that the motorist only impose a cost on pollution). considers worth US$5.00. Full cost pricing means that users directly Described diferently, eicient pricing gives bear all the costs resulting from the produc- individual consumers the savings that result tion or consumption of a good or service. when they reduce driving. For example, if roads When applied to transportation, this means and parking facilities are inanced indirectly, that motorists pay directly for all costs of the through general taxes and rents, consumers roads and parking facilities they use, with fees bear these costs even if they seldom or never that increase during peak periods and decline use those facilities. his is unfair and inef- during of-peak periods. It also means that icient. With full cost pricing, consumers only fuel prices should incorporate all direct and pay according to their use of roads and parking indirect costs of fuel production and distribu- facilities, in order to save money by reducing tion, that vehicle insurance fees should relect their vehicle ownership and use, as illustrated the incremental crash costs for each kilometre in Figure 18.

Figure 18: Eicient pricing gives consumers more opportunities to save Current pricing Efficient pricing

Motorist reduces vehicle trips Motorist reduces vehicle trips   Reduced costs to motorist and to society Reduced costs to motorist and to society (congestion, road & parking facility costs, (congestion, road & parking facility costs, accidents, pollution, etc.) accidents, pollution, etc.)   Cost savings widely dispersed through Cost savings returned to the individual economy motorist

With current pricing, savings from reduced driving are dispersed through the economy. Eficient pricing returns more savings to individuals who reduce their driving.

Economic measures can be powerful and efec- A long-term strategy is needed to implement tive at solving traic problems and increasing full cost pricing measures (or ‘internalization’ of transportation system eiciency, plus they pro- transport costs). Steep price hikes in the short- vide additional revenues which can be used to term are too extreme to be politically accept- inance new programs or reduce other taxes. able. Adjustment of market structures, transport However, they tend to be politically diicult use, behaviour, technologies and supply/demand to implement, because motorists frequently patterns needs time. Internalizing costs step object to new fees and taxes. heir implementa- by step in a long-term strategy, together with tion therefore requires careful negotiation to improvements to NMT and public transport, is build adequate political support, with special necessary for full cost pricing have a chance of consideration to insure that revenues are used being accepted by market participants and gain eiciently and in ways that provide broad com- suicient political support. munity beneits.

22 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

2.5.3 Smart growth and land use alternative modes may go unused if driving management policies remains a cheap and time-eicient option. Like- Various land use factors afect travel behaviour. wise, when only “push” incentives are imple- People who live or work in more compact, mented, such as driving fees and road tolls, driv- mixed, walkable, transit oriented communities ers are may only be frustrated and react against tend to drive less and rely more on alternative policy makers. It is unfair and impractical to modes. As a result, “smart growth” policies that discourage driving without providing practical help create more accessible, multi-modal com- alternatives. For these reasons, push and pull munities can be an efective TDM strategy. his incentives must be paired. is sometimes called “integrating transportation Figure 19: TDM measures with “push” and “pull” efects and land use planning.” For instance, by con- centrating commercial development and dense housing along transit corridors and near transit stations, and improving walking and cycling conditions in such areas, overall accessibility increases, reducing total auto- mobile travel and increasing use of alterna- tive modes. Smart growth and land use policies are not efective TDM measures in the short term, but rather, over a long timeframe. Many Measures with push- and pull-effects market forces can afect their efectiveness, Redistribution of carriageway space to provide cycle lanes, broader sidewalks, planting strips, bus lanes, …, redistribution of time-cycles at trafic lights in favour of public and so they must be part of an integrated solu- transport and non-motorised modes, public-awareness-concepts, citizens’ participation tion for mobility and growth management. and marketing, enforcement and penalizing… Source: Müller et al., (1992)

2.6 Developing a comprehensive TDM For instance, signiicant bus service improve- strategy ments in Stockholm, Sweden initially caused Most TDM measures have modest individual little increase in ridership, but when a con- impacts, typically afecting a few per cent gestion charge was also implemented, public of total vehicle travel in an area. In order to transport travel increased by about 5%. Plan- achieve signiicant total impacts it is usually ners concluded that, “Of the 22% decrease in necessary to develop a comprehensive TDM car travel across the charge zone, only 0.1% at strategy that includes an appropriate set of most could have been caused by the expanded measures. A comprehensive TDM strategy can bus services,” (City of Stockholm, 2006). Sec- have synergistic efects, that is, its total impacts tion 4.2.2.2 discusses the Stockholm congestion are greater than the sum of TDM measures charge in more detail. implemented individually. A well planned, Experience in many cities indicates similar integrated TDM strategy allows each measure results: increasing transportation system ei- to be used most efectively, targeting the appro- ciency requires a comprehensive TDM strategy priate types of travel and supporting other that improves mobility options and encourages measures. users to select the most eicient mode for each For maximum efectiveness and beneits, a trip. Such integrated programs can achieve comprehensive TDM strategy needs both posi- signiicant mode shifts and beneits. tive (“pull”) incentives, such as improved travel Just as supply-side transportation measures are options, and negative (“push”) incentives, such implemented at a mixture of approaches and as road and parking fees. When only “pull” scales, so demand-side measures should be. incentives are implemented, such as investments Unless a mix of TDM measures are applied, they to improve walking and cycling conditions and may not achieve the desired efects. It is impor- improve public transport service quality, little tant to pair “Push and Pull” TDM measures modal shift may be achieved. Investments in when developing a comprehensive TDM strategy.

23 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 9: Pairing push and pull TDM measures

PUSH PULL Restrict car access Improve transit services „„ road pricing „„ integrated system and fare structure „„ congestion pricing „„ network of priority transit corridors „„ sales tax/import duty Incentives for commuters „„ registration fee/road tax „„ parking spot cashout „„ car quota system „„ tax reduction for transit pass „„ parking pricing „„ tax reduction for biking and walking „„ parking management „„ plate restrictions Policy/Regulatory/

Economic Measures „„ low emission zones „„ 20 km per hour zones Reduce car mobility Improve quality of transit service „„ reduce parking supply „„ bus rapid transit system „„ trafic cells „„ bus lanes „„ trafic calming „„ bus priority Road space reallocation „„ light rail and commuter rail services „„ reconnect severed neighbourhoods Improve bus infrastructure Restricted trafic zones „„ quality vehicles „„ pedestrianonly zones „„ comfortable bus stations „„ easy to ind route and timetable information, bus information at bus stops, train arrival information at stations Improve bicycle infrastructure „„ bicycle lanes and parking „„ bicycle route signage and maps Improve pedestrian infrastructure „„ safe sidewalks and crosswalks Physical/Technical Measures „„ Improve mobility options „„ car sharing services „„ shared bicycle services „„ improved taxi and pedicab/rickshaw services Integrated land use planning Planning for nonmotorised transport „„ regional spatial planning „„ street design for bicycles/pedestrian trafic „„ transit oriented development „„ connectivity of streets „„ car parking planning standards to „„ maps and wayinding aids „„ complement transport policies Measures Plan/Design

Enforcement Public awareness „„ ines, tickets and towing „„ marketing transit/explaining need for TDM measures „„ events like Car Free Day Support Measures

A comprehensive TDM strategy for a city requires to encourage mode shift. Before it went into a mix of the three types of TDM measures: efect, the city’s leet of buses was nearly dou- 1. Improve mobility options bled with new, comfortable buses running on an 2. Economic measures enhanced schedule with more frequent service 3. Smart growth and land use policies oriented around links to the subway system. A comprehensive TDM strategy is like a three New technology was introduced to boost the legged stool — it will not stand up without all convenience and speed of the buses, such as three legs, because they all reinforce each other. smart farecards, priority at traic signals, and For instance, London implemented a package of displays at bus stops announcing the arrival of TDM measures using a congestion charge — a the next bus. Roads were repainted to dedicate “Push” measure — as the main driving force lanes to bus and bicycle traic. In addition, the

24 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

city closed some streets to car traic to improve safety and comfort for bicyclists and walkers, and improved pedestrian crossings and way- Comprehensive inding signs. his mix of “Push” measures TDM Strategy spanning the regulatory, physical, technical, planning and design realms combined with the powerful economic incentive of the congestion charge to result in reduced car traic, increased bus ridership, improved air quality and renewed vitality in downtown retail districts. Improve Smart Growth – Mobility Options Land Use Policies Another example is found in Singapore. Economic Before Singapore introduced the Area Licens- Measures ing Scheme (congestion pricing for the city area) in 1975, the bus services were completely revamped to cater for the expected change in modal shift. A park and ride service was ofered A three-pronged comprehensive TDM strategy Figure 20 from 15 car park and ride lots at the periphery approach requires support from the various hree-pronged of the city for those drivers who did not wish institutions responsible for implementing TDM approach for successful to drive into the city. he ring road skirting measures. his means that the stakeholders need implementation of the city was improved so that cross-town traic to be informed, motivated, and engaged. Sup- TDM measures. no longer needed to use the city roads. hese portive measures implemented by law enforce- “pull” measures helped achieve the desired ment and by private-sector stakeholders also modal shift. play an important legitimizing role.

Box 6: Solving transportation From this perspective, solving transport problems problems with TDM requires planning reforms that increase transport options, and market reforms that give consum- Transport problems and solutions can be viewed in ers suitable incentives to choose the best option two different ways. One is as individual problems for each individual trip. The motto is, “increase with technical solutions: trafic and parking con- transportation system diversity and eficiency.” gestion require building more roads and parking Transportation Demand Management is the gen- facilities; crash risk requires roads and vehicles that eral term for this approach. offer greater crash protection; energy problems require alternative fuels and eficiency standards. Although most individual TDM measures only The motto is, “adjust roads and vehicles, not driver affect a small portion of total travel, and so their behaviour.” beneits appear modest with respect any particular But this approach has a fundamental law. Solu- problem, their impacts are cumulative and syner- tions to one problem often exacerbate other prob- gistic. When all beneits and costs are considered, lems, particularly if they increase total vehicle travel. TDM programs are often the most cost effective For example, over the long run, increasing roadway way to improve transportation. capacity tends to increase crashes, energy con- Conventional evaluation practices tend to over- sumption and pollution, due to induced vehicle estimate the overall beneits of technical solutions, travel; crash protection requires heavier vehicles because they ignore indirect costs (such as the that consume more energy; fuel eficiency stand- problems resulting from induced vehicle travel), ards reduce the per-mile cost of driving, stimulating and they tend to underestimate the full beneits of more trafic congestion and crashes. As a result, TDM measures (such as helping to improve mobility this approach cannot solve all problems, because for non-drivers, or support for strategic land use the more a solution achieves its objectives, the objectives). More comprehensive evaluation and more it exacerbates other problems. planning practices are needed for TDM to receive The other perspective is that most transpor- the recognition and support that is justiied. tation problems share a common root: market Adapted from the Online TDM Encyclopedia by Todd Litman, distortions that result in excessive automobile use. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm51.htm

25 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

them more convenient and comfortable to use, 3. Improving mobility options improving user information, and increasing (“PULL”) afordability. Improving connections between these modes also improves mobility options, for For maximum efectiveness and beneits, a example, by providing bicycle storage at public comprehensive TDM strategy needs both posi- transport stations, or arranging for stores to tive (“pull”) incentives, such as improved travel ofer delivery services to customers who arrive options, and negative (“push”) incentives, such by foot or public transport. Other supportive as road and parking fees. his section focuses measures that improve mobility options include on “pull” measures, which generally increase increasing user security, raising their social mobility options, such that drivers are “pulled” status, and by creating communities that pro- to using alternative modes of travel. Pull meas- vide better access by alternative modes. Speciic ures include a range of investments in high types of improvements are described below. quality infrastructure and services that make alternative modes competitive with car travel for convenience and time eiciency. Mobility options can include: „„Walking; „„Cycling; „„Ridesharing (car and vanpooling); „„Public transport (shared taxi, bus, train, ferry boat, etc.); „„Private taxi; „„Car-sharing (vehicle rental services located in neighbourhoods, designed to substitute for private vehicle ownership). Figure 22 here are many diferent ways to improve mobility options, including increasing when High quality tram and bus interchange and where these modes are available, making in Kassel makes public transport more time competitive. Photo by Alex Kühn, Kassel (DE), 2005 3.1 Improving walking and cycling conditions Frequently, new roads and infrastructure serv- ing cars in developing cities has been built with poor regard for existing patterns of foot and bicycle travel. As a result, car infrastruc- ture such as roads, viaducts, and parking lots can form signiicant barriers to non-motorised traic, resulting in severed, or divided, com- munities. he issue of severance leads not only to signiicant shifts in travel patterns within a community, but to social divisions. It may be possible to reconnect divided communities by retroitting busy roads with separated walk and Figure 21 bikeways, or building new bridge crossings over Separated paths wide and busy roads. for bicycles and pedestrians reduces risk Severance problems can be created by unsafe, of accidents in Taipei. high-speed roads, by restrictions to non-motor- Photo by Powell, Taipei (TW), 2005 ised vehicles on speciic streets, by barriers to

26 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 23 scale and more community friendly infrastruc- Figure 24 Sidewalks blocked by parked vehicles reduces ture. San Francisco is one example, where the Children risking their on this Ho Chi Minh City street. Embarcadero viaduct along the waterfront was lives in Vientiane Photo by Gerhard Menckhoff, Ho-Chi-Minh-City (VN), 2004 torn down after being damaged in an earth- by running on the crossing streets, by a one-way street system, quake. In Seoul, an urban motorway viaduct street due to lack of and by large canals, railroad tracks, and other was demolished and replaced by a river walk safe crossing options. Photo by Thirayoot Limanond, impassable infrastructure. Detour factors are the parkway, (see Figures 25a, b and 26). Vientiane (LA), 2006 distance that the average cyclist or cycle rick- shaw operator needs to travel out of their way in 3.1.1 Improving pedestrian order to reach their destination, relative to the infrastructure distance as the crow lies (straight line distance). Developing cities often have a high mode share As large infrastructure such as motorways and of people walking, but could do a great deal Figure 25a and 25b viaducts age, they require increasingly frequent to improve the level of service for pedestrians Demolishing an and more expensive maintenance. Eventually through changes to the infrastructure. Pedes- urban highway the cost of maintenance can begin to outweigh trian infrastructure serves those walking along in Seoul created urban greenspace the beneits of the road capacity. Several U.S. or across roads, ranging from sidewalks to over- passes and tunnels to signals and crosswalks. and valuable cities have experienced this cycle of infrastruc- redevelopment ture obsolescence, and have chosen to remove Sidewalks and paths must accommodate many opportunities. large and divisive structures in favour of smaller uses and types of users. People walk alone, in Photo by Seoul Development Institute

27 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 26 or an object on the path, they require adequate Improved “shy distance”, or room to pass. Although a infrastructure in Seoul sidewalk or path may have a generous nomi- leads to increased nal width, its functional width may be much quality of life. smaller due to various types of obstacles within Photo by Lloyd Wright, Seoul (KR), 2005 its right-of-way. A sidewalk or path should be designed and managed to accommodate various uses and users, taking into account actual uses and conditions. It is also useful to collect traic accident data for accidents involving non-motorised road users from the police and map the locations as pre- cisely as possible. At the very least, intersection and non-intersection accidents should be sepa- rated. Even though the numbers are likely to be signiicantly undercounted, this simple map- ping exercise should make it possible to identify particularly dangerous locations. Once you have identiied the locations where improving non- motorised vehicle and pedestrian facilities are a groups, walk pets, push strollers and carts, run, priority, speciic designs can be developed. skate, stop to gaze and talk, play and eat on A basic irst step is to conduct an evaluation of sidewalks and paths. Many paths also accom- the walking conditions, or walkability, of an modate scooters and bicycles. Diferent uses area. Walkability takes into account the quality and users require diferent amounts of space. of pedestrian facilities, roadway conditions, land Although a person walking alone may only use patterns, community support, security and need 18–24 inches (45–60 cm) of width, other comfort for walking. users and uses require more space. A couple here are many physical measures that improve walking side-by-side, a person in a wheelchair walkability, (from Litman, 2008): Figure 27 or pushing a cart, a runner or bicyclist all require more space. A blocked pedestrian Figure 28 path in Pattaya due to In addition, sidewalks and paths contain vari- poor design, and lack A wide pedestrian path on the median in ous types of “furniture” such as signposts, park- Bangkok has trees to separate from car traic of parking enforcement. ing meters, mail boxes, garbage cans and some- Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, and also provides shade to keep users cool. Pattaya (TH), 2005 times café seating. When people pass each other Photo by Thirayoot Limanond, Bangkok (TH), 2005

28 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

„„Wide sidewalks with a clear walking area, e.g. utility poles, water hydrants, and other street furniture should be on the edges „„Painted, signed and lighted crosswalks „„Security lighting along sidewalks and of- street pathways „„Maintenance to repair pavements and keep pathways are free of litter and obstructions „„Pedestrian countdown signals, which indicate how many seconds are left in the walk phase „„Street furniture like benches, street lights, public toilets „„Covered waiting areas to protect transit pas- sengers from sun and rain Walkability improvements are usually imple- mented by local governments, sometimes with funding and technical support of regional or state/provincial transportation agencies. he irst step is a planning process to identify prob- lems and prioritize projects.

“A walkable community is designed for 3.1.1.1 Sidewalks and crosswalks Figure 29 people, to human scale, emphasizing All urban roads should have safe areas for Pedestrian and vehicle people over cars, promoting safe, people walking, such that they are separated spaces are separated by from motorised traic. Sidewalks are com- bollards in Toulouse. secure, balanced, mixed, vibrant, Photo by Andrea Broaddus, monly grade separated, that is, they are built Toulouse (FR), 2007 successful, healthful, enjoyable, and higher than the grade of the roadway, which comfortable walking, bicycling and improves visibility and protection. However many cities have adopted a newer “shared Figure 30 human association. It is a community space” approach in which textured pavements, A Shared Pedestrian that returns rights to people, looks trees, and bollards serve to slow vehicles to and bicycle path out especially for children, seniors speeds such that pedestrians can safely walk in Chiba. alongside and between them. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Chiba (JP) and people with disabilities and takes aggressive action to reduce the negative impacts of sixty-plus years of auto-centric design and uncivil driving practices. It is also a community that emphasizes economic recovery of central neighbourhoods, promotes the concepts of recovering and transforming suburban sprawl into meaningful villages, and especially takes ownership and action to protect and preserving open space.” Dan Burden of Walkable Communities (http://www.walkable.org)

29 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Crossing roads is a critical safety issue for those walking. Car-dominated road design results in wide roads with many lanes which are diicult for some pedestrians to cross within the time allotted by traic signals. In such cases “pedes- trian islands” are often used to give people a stopping point halfway across. Ideally people are always able to cross at a zebra crossing, a traic signal or signed mid-block crossing. However, motorways and higher speed arterials with few traic signals may require a separate facility for pedestrians, such as a pedestrian overpass or tunnel. hese are certainly more expensive to build, but can provide invaluable safety improvements and connections within a com- a munity which has been severed by a busy road. Overpasses and tunnels require pedestrians to climb staircases; hence it is useful to provide gentle ramps or escalators (where feasible). Oth- erwise, people often persist in trying to cross the “barrier” road despite very unsafe conditions, resulting in injuries and fatalities. Modern sidewalks often separate foot and bicycle traic, which move at diferent speeds. his helps reduce the risk of collisions between people walking and cycling.

3.1.1.2 Pedestrian zones In areas of the city where foot traic is very high, it may be appropriate to close or signii- cantly restrict vehicle traic. Pedestrian zones are usually in city centres where streets are b narrower, and in shopping or market areas. Streets in these areas may restrict normal traf- ic circulation, but permit resident, delivery and public transport vehicles operating at very low speeds. A large number of European cities have created pedestrian zones in historic central and shopping areas since the 1960s. hese are often Figure 31a A zebra crossing in Bangkok forces pedestrians to climb up to the sidewalk when crossing. Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Bangkok (TH), 2005 Figure 31b his zebra crossing in Bayonne provides a refuge for pedestrians to cross a wide street safely. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Bayonne (FR), 2007 Figure 31c A multi-modal crossing for pedestrians and c bicyclists in Paris guides users to avoid collisions. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Paris (FR), 2007

30 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 7: Building safe and comfortable „„ Send signals to drivers that they are oper- streets for pedestrians ating on areas intended for pedestrians, using signs, bollards, and textured/coloured The basic principles to protect pedestrians are: pavements. Slow down trafic speeds. „„ Elevating crosswalks at intersections rather than having pedestrian descend to the road- Speed restrictions paired with physical infra- „„ way, which can also be done with paint, structure changes design features, and markings. „„Restructuring roads to meander around trees and medians, forcing vehicles to go slow Physically protect pedestrian facilities from incursions by motor vehicles. „„Raised zebra crossings „„Changing from smooth to rough road surfaces „„Placing bollards to protect kerbs at intersec- or using rumble strips. tions prevents lorries and motorists from jump- ing kerbs and hurting pedestrians. Bollards also Reduce the distance pedestrian needs to cross. are used to prevent motorists from parking „„Traffic islands (There is a question about across sidewalks. whether it is feasible to put trafic islands in Trafic crossing signals. the middle of a multi-lane one-way street. There are a few examples (including in Curitiba, Brazil), „„NMT-only phase allowing pedestrians and but they are rare. This is a major concern in cyclists to clear the intersection before the many Indonesian cities which have very wide turning motor vehicle trafic one-way streets with long distances between „„No right turn allowed on red lights trafic lights or intersections.) „„Separate signals for NMT (In the Netherlands, „„Neck-downs at intersections, where the road there are entirely separate trafic signals for is tapered, narrowing into the intersection bicyclists, motorists, pedestrians, and trams. While this allows tram and bicycle prioritisation, (Most roads are wider than they need to be Figure 32a at intersections; neck-downs also slow turn- it is also visually confusing to some people.) Wide pedestrian ing trafic and improve pedestrian visibility to In developing countries, it is quite common to have crossing with markings turning vehicles). very large unsignalised intersections. These large for both directions unsignalised intersections are extremely danger- Reduce the amount of overall motor vehicle trafic in Singapore. ous for pedestrians and NMVs. on major NMT routes. Photo by Karl Otta, Singapore, 2004 „„ Trafic cells (rerouting through trafic out Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Figure 32b of neighbourhoods), parking restrictions, Policy-makers in Developing Cities, Module 3d: Preserving and Expanding the Role of Non-Motorised Transport,” by Walter Roadway overpass congestion or cordon pricing, reducing lane Hook for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org for pedestrians and widths, closing streets to trafic and other bicyclists in Nagoya. measures. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Nagoya (JP), 2006

31 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Argentina’s big cities; Córdoba, Mendoza and Rosario have lively pedestrian zones combined with town squares and parks which are crowded with people walking at every hour of the day and night. In Buenos Aires some stretches of Calle Florida Street have been pedestrian zones since 1913. On car-free Calle Florida and other streets there is a vibrant shopping and restaurant scene where street performers and tango dancers abound.

3.1.2 Improving bicycle infrastructure Many developing cities have a high mode share of people bicycling, but need to retain or improve the level of service for bicycles. Bicycle infra- structure ranges from space on the roadway to parking facilities to overpasses and tunnels. Table 10 describes various types of cycling facilities, including some that lack special designation or Figure 33 accompanied by parking garages or park-and- features, which should still be designed, main- ride lots on the edge of the pedestrian zone. A roadway neckdown, tained and managed to safely accommodate bicy- sign, and speed bump Central Copenhagen is one of the largest and cles. Improving these facilities tends to improve ensures that cars slow oldest examples of a pedestrian zone: the auto- down in Bayonne. cycling conditions and increase cycling activity. free zone is centred on Strøget, a pedestrian Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Figure 34a Bayonne (FR), 2007 shopping street, which is in fact not a single street but a series of interconnected avenues, Car free pedestrian zone in Berlin with crossed in places by streets with vehicular traf- restricted access times for trucks and bicycles. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Berlin (DE), 2003 ic. Most of these zones allow delivery lorries to Figure 34b service the businesses located there during the early morning, and street-cleaning vehicles will Pedestrian zones in shopping districts increase the visual interest and convenience of walking, usually go through these streets after most shops such as this vibrant street in Naples. have closed for the night. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Naples (IT), 2007

a b

32 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 35 Cycling improvements are usually implemented Figure 36 Pedestrian zones like this one in Chengdu by local governments, sometimes with fund- A well designed may restrict cars and bicycles, but allow ing and technical support of regional or state/ bicycle lane with vendors and street performers. provincial transportation agencies. In the U.S., painting and textured Photo by Karl Fjellstrom, Chengdu (CN), 2003 many local governments have adopted a “com- pavement in London. Photo by Lloyd Wright, A signiicant amount of cycling occurs on roads, plete streets” policy which requires all roadways London (UK), 2006 motorway shoulders and sidewalks that have no to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle special designation or design features for cycling. traic, either in new construction, or through It is therefore important to design, maintain and retro-itting during maintenance activities. manage all of these facilities to accommodate cycling. For example, as much as possible road- 3.1.2.1 Bicycle lanes ways should have minimal potholes and cracks Ensuring that conditions are safe and attractive that can catch a bicycle tire, particularly along for bicycling plays an important role in trans- the kerbside lane, and shoulders should be paved portation demand management. Bicycle lanes and maintained in good condition. are a physical measure which improves safety Table 10: Facility types used by cyclists

Type Description Various types of paths and trails separated from roadways. These can be Paths and trails built along motorways and railroad rights of way, through parks, and other locations where a linear corridor exists. Special road lanes for use by cyclists. In some cases this involves Bike lanes removing kerb parking, which tends to increase cyclist comfort and safety. Bike routes Roadways designated as being extra suitable for cycling. City streets selected for and designed with features to facilitate cycling Bicycle boulevards and discourage excess motor vehicle trafic speeds and volumes. Designated shared Roadways (particularly city streets) with markings to indicate that cyclists streets should ride in the trafic lane. A signiicant amount of cycling occurs on roadways that have no special General roadways designation or design features. Motorway shoulders Motorway shoulders, both paved and unpaved, are often used for cycling. Sidewalks are used by some cyclists, particularly by children and Sidewalks inexperienced adults, and along busy roadways that lack provisions for cycling. End of Trip Facilities These include bike racks, storage lockers, and shower/changing facilities.

Adapted from: Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, http://www.vtpi.org/tdm

33 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

adjacent to sidewalks may be designated by a painted line or diferent colour or texture of pavement. Such “multi-use paths” are often con- fusing to users, however, and may be inadequate for high volumes of bicycle traic. Copenhagen has developed a grade-separated system of cycle tracks in response to this issue, because of the high volume of cyclists there. Of-road bicycle paths are part of the bicycle route network of many cities, often providing cyclists with more direct routes which are of limits to vehicles, such as through parks or alongside rivers. here are advantages and disadvantages to physi- cally separating NMT lanes, as shown in Table 11 (from Sourcebook Module 3d).

3.1.2.2 Bicycle parking Figure 37 and comfort for cyclists, as well as legitimizing Provision of convenient and secure bicycle Bicycle infrastructure their place on the road for drivers. hey are usu- parking is an important part of bicycle infra- in Hanoi — a roadway ally most necessary on narrow or busy arterial structure. In public space, plentiful bicycle racks exclusively for bikes. roads, where conlicts with cars are more likely should be located in shopping areas and outside Photo by Gerhard Menckhoff, (e.g. on quieter collector streets cars can usually Hanoi (VN), 2005 of bus and train stations. Cities can require pri- easily pass bicyclists). Typically about 1 meter vate parking lots and garages for cars, as well as wide, bicycle lanes are painted on the pavement commercial and residential buildings to provide and marked with a bicycle symbol. hey may be bicycle parking. Bicycles which regularly appear Figure 38 on the edge of a roadway or in between a park- locked to trees and posts are an indicator that Bicycle paths for ing lane and a traic lane. more bicycle parking is needed at that location. both directions are Some cities provide bicycle lanes adjacent to Efective bicycle parking requires a properly segregated from the roads, either at the same grade but separated by designed rack in an appropriate location, as street in London. bollards or other barrier, or designated within discussed in Box 9. An emerging practice is to Photo by Lloyd Wright, London (UK), 2006 the pedestrian area In the latter case, bike lanes integrate bicycle parking alongside car parking Figure 39 Separated grade two-way bicycle path in Paris. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Paris (FR), 2007

34 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 11: Advantages and disadvantages to physically separating NMT lanes

Advantages Disadvantages Provide a greater sense of security to the NMT If they are too narrow, passing is dificult, and user three-wheelers can obstruct the lane Prone to illing with debris and occupation by They are self-enforcing street vendors Allow for two-directional NMT travel even on one- Must be located on the kerbside of parked way roads vehicles Ensure that NMT users will not make sudden Can make lorry deliveries to store-fronts less movements into the motor-vehicle lanes or convenient obstruct motorists Less frequently obstructed by double parked cars Three-wheeled trafic requires more space, at least or illegal use by motor vehicles and motorcycles 2.4 m for two-way trafic, and 4 m where feasible

Box 8: Design of non-motorised reasons. First, sometimes non-motorised trafic transport (NMT) lanes can be routed off major arterials by taking second- ary and tertiary arterials. The availability of these The CROW Manual (see below) makes recom- routes, however, may not be commonly known. mendations regarding when to use different types Coded bike routes, coupled with bike maps, can of bicycle facilities. The two determinants are the help cyclists identify more bicycle or NMV friendly volume of motor vehicles and the motor vehicle routes. Secondly, it can be used to indicate that, speeds. On roads where trafic speeds are less along this route, trafic signals, intersections, and than 30 km/h, no separation is necessary. On roadway maintenance have been designed to roads with speeds between 30 km/h and 60 km/h prioritise bicycle and other NMV use. it depends on the trafic low. At 40 km/h, if there On one-way streets, if the lane is not physically are more than 6,000 passenger car units (pcu)/24 separated, the NMV lane should also be one-way. hours, separate bike facilities can be justiied. In countries where motorists drive on the right side At over 60 km/h, with any signiicant volume of of the road, it is preferable to have the NMV facility trafic, separated facilities are virtually always on the right side of the road. Bicyclists travelling recommended. the wrong direction on a one-way bike lane are a For any facility where speed limits or actual major cause of accidents. motor vehicle speeds are 40 km/h or less, special Intersection design facilities for bicycles are not really necessary. If speed limits or actual operating speeds are higher In developed countries, most accidents occur at than 40 km/h, but the kerb lane or a paved shoulder intersections. In developing countries there are also is wide enough to accommodate bicycles without a signiicant number of accidents between intersec- any specially designated lane, a special bicycle tions, mainly caused by crossings of long arterials. lane is also not necessary, but may be desirable There are two basic theories about how to inte- for reasons stated below. grate non-motorised vehicles into intersections. Simple measures on ordinary streets can also One is to pull them out of the intersection, and the be very important. A major consideration is the other is to have them pulled into the intersection design of storm drains. They should be designed and clear the intersection irst. so that bicycle wheels do not fall into them. Steep In China and Bogotá, there are actually some open drainage ditches also present hazards for major motorway interchanges where bicyclists cyclists. Steep kerb cuts are also more hazard- have their own fully grade separated route through ous than rounded kerb cuts. Cyclists are also the interchange, where motorists pass both above as sensitive if not more sensitive to pot holes, and below the bicycle paths. cracks in the roadway, overgrown plants along The CROW Design Manual for Bicycle Trafic is a publication of the roadside, sand, gravel, and oil on the road- the Netherlands’ national Information and Technology Platform way, and other maintenance concerns that also for Transport, Infrastructure and Public Space (CROW). For affect motorists. more information, see http://www.crow.nl/engels; Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Sometimes the simple posting of bicycle route Policy-makers in Developing Cities, Module 3d: Preserving and Expanding the Role of Non-Motorised Transport,” by Walter signs on existing streets can be important for two Hook for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org

35 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 40 On-street bicycle Box 9: Factors in development of parking in Cambridge bicycle parking ofers bicyclists enough Use the appropriate bicycle rack for user space and helps to needs: reduce uncontrolled parking on sidewalks. Short-term parking Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Needed where bicycles will be left for short Cambridge (UK), 2007 stops. It requires a high degree of convenience (as close to destinations as possible). At least some short-term bicycle parking should be protected from the weather (a portion can be unprotected, since demand tends to increase during dry weather). Long-term parking Needed where bicycles will be left for hours at a time. It requires a high degree of security and weather protection, with well-designed racks in covered areas, lockers, storage rooms, or fenced areas with restricted access. Other factors to consider: Visibility. Racks should be highly visible so cyclists can spot them immediately when they arrive from the street. A visible location also discourages theft and vandalism. Security. Adequate lighting and surveillance is essential for the security of the bicycles and the users. Bicycle racks and lockers must be well anchored to the ground to avoid vandal- ism and theft. Weather Protection. A portion of bicycle parking should be protected from the weather (some short-term bicycle parking can be unpro- tected since bicycle use tends to increase sig- niicantly during fair weather). This can use an existing overhang or covered walkway, a special covering, weatherproof outdoor bicycle lockers, or an indoor storage area. Clearance. Adequate clearance is required around racks to give cyclists room to manoeu- vre, and to prevent conlicts with pedestrians or parked cars. Racks should not block access to building entrances or ire hydrants. Source: Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, Figure 41 http://www.vtpi.org High bicycle parking demand can be managed with parking installations that maximize reserved space, as shown in Copenhagen. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Copenhaguen (DK), 2006

36 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 42 Bicycle parking at a metro/tram interchange in Munich encourages the multi-modal use of transport modes. Photo by Alex Kühn, Munich (DE), 2004

Figure 43 A shared bicycle system in Sevilla. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Sevilla (ES), 2008 in the roadway, which frees up sidewalk space for pedestrians. In most cases bicycle parking is free, although in some cities with high bicycling modal share, people will pay for higher security parking with an attendant.

3.1.2.3 Shared bicycle services Many potential bicycle users may be discour- aged by the lack of a bicycle. Some cities assist such potential bicyclists by providing free or low-cost bicycles for public use. Often the bicy- cles are owned by a company that rents them out, or provided by a charitable organisation. he city of Copenhagen provides specially designed bicycles with a map of tourist destina- tions built into the handlebars. he bicycles are free, but a €2 coin must be inserted to unlock the bike for use, which serves as a deposit. Some European cities have encouraged irms to provide low-cost bicycle rental services. In Paris, for example, the “Velib” service consists of bike rental stations located throughout the city. Users swipe a debit card at a payment kiosk to release a bike from a storage rack, and must return the bike to another rental station when inished. In Germany, the national train operator Deutsche Figure 44 Bahn has a public bicycle rental division. he Rent-a-Cycle in Osaka. Photo by Lloyd Wright, “Call a Bike” service allows customers to set Osaka (JP), 2006

37 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 468 Cycle rickshaws like this one in Chiang Mai are an important mode of transportation throughout Asia. Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Chiang Mai (TH), 2005 up an account with a credit or debit card, and then use a cell phone to rent bikes through an automated service. he bicycles are left by users on street corners around the city, rather than at rental stations. Pedi cabs or cycle-rickshaws are another popular form of public bicycle. hey provide the same mobility services as car taxis, but without gen- erating any pollution. Cycle-rickshaws are most plentiful in developing countries, where they are also an important livelihood for men supporting families. Pedi cabs are a growing presence U.S. and European cities, for instance London, New York and Berlin. Figure 45 and is available at 100 rail stations. OV-i ets rental CALL-A-BIKE in Box 10: Examples of shared bicycle facilities provide fast and easy access to rental Berlin — public services in operation bikes, which can be used as extension of the rail bicycle scheme trip. The service covers most larger stations in managed by the public Vélo à la Carte: A public private partnership the Randstad (the largest agglomeration in The transport operator. in Rennes, France Netherlands) and several stations in other regions. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Vélo à la Carte, which operates 200 bicycles at Berlin (DE), 2007 Users have to register with OV-i ets before they 25 stations, was started in 1998 as a partnership can access the service. They receive an OV-i ets between the City of Rennes and the commercial card, which enables them to check out the bicy- billboard company Clear Channel Adshell. Clear cles from a computerised system at the stations. Channel offers the smart bike system to local Alternatively users can register for an existing authorities that are also using other services of the yearly Railpass that also i ts the system. The bicy- company, as information kiosks or bus shelters. cles can be used one way, e.g. to the workplace, The company is responsible for the implementa- where they can be parked and locked for a cer- tion and operation of Vélo à la Carte in Rennes. tain period of time, until the user needs them for The services are paid for through advertisements the return trip to the rail station. The user fee for which appear on outdoor furniture, funding also OV-i ets is €2.75 per 20 hours, with a maximum the smart bike programme. For Clear Channel rental period of 60 hours. The user pays monthly Adshell, the service is beneiciary as it adds value by standing order, which requires a bank account to the range of street furniture as additional amen- in The Netherlands. In 2006, more than 23,000 ity that is provided to local authorities. The City people were registered as users of the system. In of Rennes benei ts from the increased mobility 2007, the OV-i ets foundation will be taken over choices for its citizens. by the National Dutch rail company NS. OV-i ets OV-fi ets: Public Bicycles for rail users is one of the few Public Bicycle schemes that is expected to be proitable in the near future as it OV-i ets (OV= Public transport, i ets=Bicycle) can reach economies of scale. started in 2002 as a publicly subsidised pilot Excerpted from the EU project NICHES policy note publication, project in The Netherlands, aiming at making “New Seamless Mobility Services: Public Bicycles,” which may the bicycle a part of the public transport system. be found on the project website, Meanwhile it is established as a permanent service http://www.niches-transport.org/index.php?id=155

38 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 47 Cycle rickshaws are popular as a low cost public transport alternative in Hanoi. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Hanoi (VN), 2006

Box 11: Notes on implementing some other cities where the mayor is less fully supports the plans, he can use his of infrastructure powerful. Support for the NMT improve- access to media to push them forward. ments from the NGO community existed, NGOs can also make clever use of the improvements for non- but it was clearly the Mayor’s ofice which media to win popular support for NMT motorised modes pushed it forward. Similarly, the pedes- improvements. Politically, it is often easier to implement trianisation of downtown Curitiba, Brazil, Involving all the relevant stakeholders an extremely expensive rail or motorway was also pushed through by an enlight- both inside and outside the government project than even the simple improvement ened Mayor (see Module 1a: The Role of in the planning process from the outset, of a sidewalk. This is because any large Transport in Urban Development Policy). and letting them take ownership of the construction project has large interests The prioritisation of bicycle use in China plans, is also likely to reduce signiicant which stand to make a lot of money if the was a decision by the highest levels of obstacles to implementation. project is implemented, and therefore are the national government and party, just While it can cost tens of millions of willing to push government oficials on a as today the restrictions against bike use dollars to properly reconstruct a single regular basis to ensure it is implemented. are being pushed through national level major public transport hub or intersec- Politicians also stand to gain by being iden- political pressure. tion to ensure safe non-motorised travel tiied with the completion of public works. In other locations, pressure from bicy- integration, many measures to improve Even though basic improvements like the clists, NGOs, and international funding conditions for non-motorised transport construction of sidewalks may do more to agencies has proven critical. The bike can be done for the cost of basic roadway alleviate trafic congestion and road acci- facilities in most large US cities, in West- paint. Construction costs vary from coun- dents than other projects costing hundreds ern Europe, in Central Europe (Krakow, try to country. Most measures can also be of times more, the low cost and everyday Budapest, etc), in Bangkok, and the dra- implemented rapidly, in less than a year. nature of these improvements makes it matic improvement in pedestrian facilities Physical construction for pilot projects will dificult to ind a political constituency to in Seoul clearly resulted from pressure take weeks rather than months. ensure their implementation. applied to governments by NGOs and Developing cities should start by form- Historically, these sorts of projects have cycling federations. In Accra and Tamale ing a non-motorised transport task force, come about, because someone with politi- (Ghana), in Tanzania, in Marakina, Manila which can initiate a planning process. This cal power, money, and perseverance made (Philippines), Lima (Peru), Gdansk (Poland), task force can then begin to develop and them happen. The most recent large-scale Yogyakarta (Indonesia), and Santiago de implement measures, beginning with iso- non-motorised transport improvement Chile, new bike and other NMT facilities lated improvements, and in a relatively was done in the city of Bogotá. In Bogotá, were given a strong push by international short period laying the foundation for a improving the city’s transportation system organisations such as the World Bank or city-wide network of non-motorised trans- in this way was a major campaign prom- UNDP, and often more speciically commit- port routes. ise of Mayor Enrique Peñalosa who was ted individuals within these institutions. personally convinced of the importance of Other factors critical to ensuring imple- Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-makers in Developing Cities, Module 3d: such measures. In the city of Bogotá, the mentation are good public education Preserving and Expanding the Role of Non-Motor- Mayor also has enormous power, unlike in efforts through the media. If the Mayor ised Transport,” by Walter Hook for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org

39 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

3.2 Improving public transport service 3.2.1 Increased public transport services Policy and regulatory measures which improve transit services do so generally by afecting the framework conditions for vehicle operators, and by dedicating more public resources toward capital improvements, such as new buses and stations. A thorough discussion of issues related to regulation of bus services and fares is more thoroughly addressed in Sourcebook Module 3c: Bus Regulation and Planning.

3.2.1.1 Integrated services Many cities have multiple public transport oper- ators, such as diferent bus companies, or difer- ent local governments. Often the route networks Figure 48 and schedules are not well coordinated, such Modern pedi cab in Berlin. that riders need to transfer between services at Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Berlin (DE), 2007 jurisdictional boundaries, or have long waiting

Box 12: Stages in the development of Information integration is through the publica- Singapore’s public transport system tion of a “Transit Link Guide“, which lists all informa- tion on bus routes and train lines; and by putting There are two multimodal private operators in up information panels at major bus stops on the Singapore, both running bus and commuter rail. bus services calling there. Transit Link provides They have set up a service company, Transit Link an electronic guide, the e-Guide on the Internet Pte Ltd, in an effort to integrate trains and buses and operates a toll-free call centre for integrated to function together as one single, comprehensive information on bus and train services. public transport network. Transit Link facilitates Network integration is through centralised fare integration, information integration and net- rationalisation of bus services whenever a new work integration. train line is introduced to reduce wasteful dupli- Fare integration is done through a common cation of bus and train services. Transit Link uses ticketing system using a contactless smart card, a computer model (TRIPS) which is able to pre- called the “ez-link card,” as the mode of payment. dict and forecast changes to commuter demand The ez-link cards can be used on trains and buses and ridership, when new train lines and new bus of both companies. Its main advantage is that it routes are added. However, the programs do not offers cost savings to commuters making trans- generate bus routes, which need experience and fers between train/bus and between bus/bus by knowledge of conditions on the ground. granting cash rebates. To qualify for these rebates, Integration of fares, information and network the transfer has to be made within the stipulated facilitate seamless travel for commuters. The window period of 45 minutes. Commuters enjoy greatest beneit is to have a common farecard for transfer rebates for the irst, second and third use on all forms of public transport. When cash transfers on a journey. The ez-link card can be rebates are given for commuters making transfers topped up with cash at train stations, bus inter- between modes within prescribed times, it lowers changes and convenience stores; or linked to bank commuters’ grouses towards making transfers. accounts for automatic topping up periodically. Commuters without the ez-link card are able to Source: Lessons from Bus Operations – A P G Menon and Loh pay the bus fare by dropping the exact fares in Chow Kuang, 2006 a coin box, located next to the bus captain, for For further details please also see Sourcebook him to dispense a paper ticket. The fare for cash Module 3c, page 22. payment is however, higher than if it is paid by ez-link card.

40 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

times between buses and trains. Better integra- Physical and technical TDM measures which tion of transit services is a TDM measure which improve transit services range from providing does not require large capital investment, but additional bus routes and service frequency, rather improved planning and communication light rail and commuter rail service, and inter- among operators. Seeking to integrate services city rail service. Developing cities which are into one network helps customers navigate the served by small independent bus operators may system, and can make it more transparent and best improve the quality of service and comfort attractive to new users. for passengers by improving supportive infra- Fare integration is another component which structure such as bus stops and rail stations. can improve the ease of use. Simplifying fare Typical urban public transport services are a collection such that customers can purchase mix of various vehicles: monthly passes and easily transfer between Commuter rail – full size trains pulled by loco- operators is more diicult to implement, motives which operate at relatively high speeds because a system of revenue tracking and trans- on inter-city heavy rail tracks with segregated fer must be developed, but it can help attract right-of-way and infrequent far-between stops, riders. Box 12 illustrates the progression of Singapore’s bus system from disparate local can carry several hundred passengers. providers to an integrated system using smart Light rail transit (LRT) – smaller trains operat- card fare collection. ing at moderate speeds within urban areas with

Box 13: Measures to improve public „„Improved rider information and Marketing transport services programs, including real-time information on transit vehicle arrival (Dziekan and Vermeulen, General categories of transit improvements: 2006). „„Increased service (more transit vehicle- „„Transit Oriented Development and Smart miles) Growth, which result in land use patterns more „„Improved service (more comfortable, conven- suitable for transit transportation. ient, reliable, etc.). „„Pedestrian and Cycling Improvements that „„Incentives to use transit (lower fares, commuter improve access around transit stops. inancial incentives, marketing, etc.). „„Bike and Transit Integration (bike racks on „„Transit oriented development (land use pat- buses, bike routes and Bicycle Parking near terns designed to support transit, including transit stops). more compact, walkable, mixed development „„Universal Design of vehicles, stations and around transit stations and corridors). pedestrian facilities to accommodate people Speciic measures that grow transit ridership: with disabilities and other special needs. „„Park & Ride facilities. „„Additional routes, expanded coverage, Improved Security for transit users and increased service frequency, and longer hours „„ pedestrians. of operation. Create a Multi-Modal Access Guide, which „„HOV Priority (HOV lanes, bus ways, queue- „„ includes maps, schedules, contact numbers jumper lanes, bus-priority trafic signals, and and other information on how to reach a par- other measures that reduce delay to transit ticular destination by public transport. vehicles). Grade separate transit lines, so they are not delayed by cross-streets and trafic „„Improved coordination of transit modes and congestion. networks to increase rider convenience and access to information. „„Reallocate Road Space to transit and walking. „„Services targeting particular travel needs, such as express commuter buses, Special „„Comfort improvements, including bus shelters Event service, and various types of Shuttle and better seats. Services „„Lower and more convenient fares (such as discounts for frequent users). Source: Online TDM Encyclopedia, http://www.vtpi.org „„More convenient fare payment using electronic “smart cards”.

41 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

more frequent stops linking neighbourhoods a publicly operated system which is contracted and commercial areas, with separate right-of- out to private concessionaires. way that can be within road corridors. Vehicles usually consist of two cars capable of carrying 3.2.1.2 Bus rapid transit (BRT) up to 120 passengers; they may be diesel or Bus rapid transit (BRT) is a broad term for bus electric powered. systems designed to provide service quality simi- Streetcars – also called trams or trolleys, small lar to rail transit, but with lower cost and greater trains operating at lower speeds on urban streets lexibility. his includes having ixed guide ways and often mingling with vehicle traic with or bus ways to maximize speed and comfort, very frequent stops, usually one car or two cars high frequency service, attractive stations, and with 40–80 passenger capacity, typically electric quick boarding systems and other features to engines. minimize delay. Both developed and developing cities are now building BRT systems. Bus – large vehicles carrying approximately 40 passengers, usually diesel powered but cities BRT right-of-ways may be created at-grade with air quality problems may use LPG, CNG within an existing roadway, or at an elevated or electricity. Modern designs have low loors grade. Tram-like vehicles may be used which and wide doors to ease entry for senior passen- allow rapid boarding and a smooth ride. Some gers or those with baby carriages; articulated systems have platforms resembling those used buses which are double the usual length with a by train services, with high quality shelters and lexible central section. passenger information. Ideally, a fare collection is located on the platform, avoiding a source of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – high quality bus conventional bus service delay. service with greater frequency and higher travel speeds operating primarily in dedicated cor- 3.2.1.3 Bus lanes ridors. Vehicles may be conventional buses or Reliable travel times make bus travel more resemble rubber-tired trains. BRT is discussed attractive. Dedicated bus lanes are a physi- in greater detail in Section 3.2.1.2 below, cal measure which improves bus reliability by Figure 49 and are the topic of Sustainable Transport allowing buses to move separately from con- Bogotá’s TransMilenio Sourcebook Module 3b. gested traic, and without merging in and out BRT stations provide Ferry – boats operating in urban harbours link- Figure 50 fast, convenient ing diferent parts of a city separated by water; BRT stations are located on the median. boarding. capable of carrying dozens to hundreds of pas- Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Exclusive lanes ensure short travel times. Bogotá (CO), 2006 sengers. Often ferry services are the only part of Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Bogotá (CO), 2006

42 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 14: Bus rapid transit (BRT) „„Convenient user information and marketing programs. Bus rapid transit takes part of its name from rapid „„High quality bus stations with transit oriented transit which describes a high-capacity rail trans- development in nearby areas. port system with its own right of way, its alignment „„Modal integration, with BRT service coordi- often being elevated or running in tunnels, and nated with walking and cycling facilities, taxi typically running long trains at short headways services, intercity bus, rail transit, and other of a few minutes. Because of the name similarity transportation services. one tends to associate the merits of rapid transit „„Excellent customer service. also with the newer BRT expression. BRT encom- „„Improved security for transit users and passes a broad variety of modes, including those pedestrians. known or formerly known as express buses, limited bus ways and rapid bus ways and even BHNS in How it is Implemented France (Bus à Haut Niveau de Service). Bus rapid transit systems are usually implemented Ironically, the term bus rapid transit does not through a cooperative effort involving local plan- refer to the speed of BRT buses. Typical transit ning agencies and transit service providers. To speeds of BRT systems range from 12–30 miles be effective it requires coordination of roadway per hour (19–48 km/h), which compares well with design and management, bus purchasing, tran- surface running light rail transit. BRT design fea- sit operations, local land use planning decisions, tures provide high quality and cost-effective transit transit marketing and TDM programs. service. These include: Bus Rapid Transit requires that bus transit be „„Grade-separated right-of-way including bus given increased respect and priority in transpor- ways (for bus use only) HOV lanes (for buses, tation planning decisions, including investments, vanpools and ), and other transit prior- roadway management and land use development. ity measures. Some systems use guide ways Where transit service quality is currently poor, BRT which automatically steer the bus on portions implementation may require policy and institutional of the route. reforms, such as changes in transportation plan- „„Frequent, high-capacity service with passen- ning and roadway management practices (to give ger waits of less than 10-minutes during peak buses priority in trafic); vehicle purchasing; transit times regulations and contacting (to maintain a high „„High-quality tram-like vehicles, those are quality of service); and (to increase easy to board, quiet, clean and comfortable development near BRT routes). to ride. Figure 51 „„Pre-paid fare collection to minimize boarding Major barriers to BRT implementation include Reliability attracts delays. a lack of leadership, limited funds, automobile more passengers. An „„Integrated fare systems, allowing free or oriented land use planning, and stigma that is exclusive bus lane discounted transfers between routes and sometimes associated with buses. like this one in Seoul modes. Source: Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, improves travel time. http://www.vtoi.org Photo by Lloyd Wright, Seoul (KR), 2005 of traic. “With-low bus lanes” are bus lanes in the same direction as the normal traic low and only require separation by painted road lines. hey are easily implemented but require good enforcement to be efective. Often other vehicles that form an alternative to cars are allowed in bus lanes, such as taxis, motorcycles, and bicy- cles. Singapore introduced its bus lanes in 1974 along the kerbside lane of most major roads operating during peak hours resulting in bus improvements of up to 15%. Another advantage is that since buses keep to the kerbside lane, bus drivers never skip bus stops, and are less ham- pered by cars merging from lane to lane.

43 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 12: BRT myths and reality

Myth Reality Bogotá’s TransMilenio system moves 36,000 passengers per BRT cannot compete with rail hour per direction while BRT corridors in Sao Paulo can also system capacity. provide capacities over 30,000 passengers per hour per direction. This is more than all LRT systems and many metro systems. BRT is only appropriate for BRT is implemented in many large cities, including Bogotá which small cities with low population has 7 million inhabitants, Manila, Bangkok, Jakarta, and Beijing. densities. Design solutions exist for virtually every road space circumstance. BRT requires a great deal of road Quito runs a BRT system through three metre wide streets in space and cannot be built in its historical centre. Even rail takes space, for example, support narrow roadways pillars for SkyTrain require a trafic lane. BRT cannot compete with rail A US GAO study found that a comparison of BRT and LRT options in terms of speed and systems actually showed that BRT systems produced faster travel time average speeds (US GAO, 2001). BRT uses vehicles with rubber It is doubtful that anyone in Bogotá, Curitiba, or Quito feels tyres which is an inferior that they have an “inferior technology”. The appearance of BRT technology; customers will never stations, terminals and vehicles can all be made to appear as accept BRT sophisticated and inviting as any rail option. BRT cannot deliver the transit- Experience in cities such as Bogotá and Curitiba indicate that oriented development and land BRT can stimulate urban development around stations similar to Figure 52 use advantages of rail rail transit, if given appropriate support. Bus priority lane BRT is ine as a feeder service, BRT can provide both feeder service and on high-density but it cannot serve main corridors mainline urban corridors. in London. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-makers in Developing Cities, Module 3b: Bus Rapid Transit,” by Lloyd London (UK), 2006 Wright for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org Some bus lanes may be used only to bypass a congestion point and may not be very long, in some cases with low bus lanes may only be in efect during peak hours. Some may be a single contra-low bus lane that allows buses to travel in the opposite direction on a one-way road. In some cases bus lanes may only be in efect during peak hours. For contra-low bus lanes, it is preferable to separate the lane from others by a physical divider. However, Tianjin in China uses contra-low bus lanes without the use of dividers quite efectively. Contra-low bus lanes usually operate throughout the day. In some cases entire roadways are dedicated to buses, making them “bus ways” or “bus malls”. Examples are Oxford St in London and Fulton St in New York, which are only open to buses, taxis and delivery vehicles. Use of bus lanes is sometimes permitted for High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV), or vehicles carrying a relatively large number of passengers, such as vanpools and carpools. hese are typically on high capac- ity arterials or motorways. Bus ways may be developed as part of a transit priority network which improves bus operations throughout the

44 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 53 he environmental axis in Bogotá is restricted to use by TransMilenio buses and pedestrians. Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Bogotá (CO), 2006

Box 15: Use of telematics for bus priority in Aalborg, Denmark Public transit has to develop its services, con- venience, and comfort in order to keep pace with private cars. The introduction of advanced ITS in the public transport system made Aalborg the leading city in Denmark in this ield. These measures improved the quality and image of public transport services. Real-time bus arrival information is known to reduce perceived waiting times and increase customer satisfaction. Some of the objectives and targets of the telematics initiatives were to: entire system. In a transit priority network, „„Integrate public transit services in one uni- roadways or sections of roadway in congested ied system; areas are classiied according to which type „„Promote public transit as a “modern” means of transportation; of traic gets the priority for space and travel „„Ensure reliable public transport services speed: bus, car, or non-motorised traic. throughout the day; „„Provide easy access to travel information; 3.2.1.4 Bus priority at intersections „„Pave the way for future ITS services in public A technical measure that helps buses travel transit faster and improves reliability is signal priori- „„Improve the working climate for the tization. his involves equipping buses with drivers; transponders which communicate with traic „„Reduce perceived waiting times; signals. With this telematics technology, the „„Increase perceived security. traic signal knows that a bus is approaching By 2008, 209 buses — approximately 80% of and reacts in order to allow the bus to pass, the leet — were itted with bus computers. either by turning green or remaining green for The new local train stations in the built-up area an extended period. Intersection priority can be and the new nodal points in the restructured particularly helpful when implemented in con- bus network were fitted with real-time pas- senger information. Passengers also beneit junction with bus lanes or streets, because gen- from reduced walking distances and a clearer eral-purpose traic does not intervene between structure via the lexible utilisation of platforms, buses and traic signals. which minimized the size of the facility. 3.2.1.5 Improving public transport Several technological measures were taken: infrastructure The ITS telematics allows public transport „„ In addition to public transport service, the qual- vehicles to gain priority at intersections. ity of infrastructure serving passengers can be „„It provides real-time passenger information at primary transfer points. improved for comfort and safety, which helps „„Existing services on the Internet are expanded retain and attract riders. Such infrastructure (http://www.aalborg-traikinfo.dk). includes bus stops, shelters, bus transfer stations, „„The system is designed to open up pos- and rail stations. Low cost infrastructure which sibilities for future services via SMS etc. can increase the speed and reliability of bus A Travel Information Centre with an on- service include bus turnouts, boarding islands, line Info-kiosk is provided at the coach- and kerb realignments. terminal. Source: http://www.civitas-initiative.org At bus stops, adequate lighting and visibility are basic necessities for public security. Provision

45 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 545 Figure 555 Bus station in Curitiba. A high level platform like this one in Curitiba Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, reduces boarding time, and so bus travel time. Curitiba (BR), 2006 Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Curitiba (BR), 2006

Figure 56 BRT station in Changzhou. Photo by Josef Traenkler, 6Figure 58 Changzhou (CN), 2007 Real-time bus arrival information at a bus stop in Munich. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Munich (DE), 2007

Figure 57 Bus shelter in Nagoya. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Nagoya (JP), 2006

46 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 16: Public private partnership to Of the 4,400 bus stops, more than 90% have improve commuter facilities bus shelters with seats. Bus shelters are often compared unfavourably with train stations, which in Singapore are much more comfortable with better amenities. In a household interview perception survey con- Commuters at bus shelters experience noise, dust ducted in 1989 after new train service started, and fumes, and buses do not come as regularly respondents rated the bus below the car and the as trains. It is thus necessary to provide commut- train in terms of speed, riding comfort, safety and ers with a place where they can wait comfortably noise. The bus scored above the car and the train for the buses. only in terms of cost of travel. A number of meas- Initially, the bus shelters were small and spar- ures were taken by the bus agency to improve the tan in appearance. There were requests for bigger quality of the travel experience and make the bus bus shelters that protect the commuters from sun more attractive to passengers. and rain. This is dificult to achieve in a tropical One of the hassles of taking public transport city with humid weather and occasional thun- is making transfers between modes. There are derstorms. If the commuters are to be protected walking and waiting times to contend with. Much from the rain, the shelter has to be enclosed, but effort has gone into physical integration of com- an enclosed bus shelter will be unbearable on a muter facilities near train stations. Bus stops, taxi hot humid day. Over the years, bus shelters have stops, car pick-up/drop off points and controlled become larger and some even have high roofs to pedestrian crossings are provided near to train protect commuters from the rain when they board stations, for commuters to transfer easily from double decker buses one mode to another conveniently. Since 1995, private irms have been given adver- The bus journey is most tiresome when com- tisement rights for a ixed number of years in return muters need to transfer between modes or travel for building/maintaining new bus shelters and during rainy days, which is typical of Singapore’s cleaning them periodically. Tastefully designed weather. Therefore, facilities are provided for com- lighted advertisement panels that change displays muters to walk to bus stops under cover and wait as frequently as a fortnightly, are commonplace at bus shelters comfortably. In another effort to at most bus shelters. In the remote areas where make walking to bus stops and train stations irms have no interest in advertising, the govern- fully sheltered from the sun and the rain, there ment builds and maintains the bus shelters. is a network of covered walkways over roadside Source: Lessons from Bus Operations – A P G Menon and Loh footpaths and across open areas leading to these Chow Kuang, 2006 terminals, from areas of high pedestrian concentra- tion. This makes the public transport experience more acceptable.

Box 17: Bus lanes and infrastructure „„Cycle parking is provided at all stations, inter- improvements in London changes and key shelters „„Bus priority on roadways across the net- The main objective of this measure was to build work, improving passenger journey times and an optimised and user-friendly infrastructure for eficiency public transport activities, which will encourage „„Revised trafic calming scheme to provide more people to use public transport. The goal was to predictable running times create a seamless, accessible passenger envi- „„Real-time telematics display at bus stops ronment with consistent quality and branding. „„Bus Shelter Working Group established to This included: identify best practices and implement damage „„Improved infrastructure, signage, information, report system and access at interchanges (transfer points) By 2007, £1.1 million capital funding had been „„Improved quality and quantity of information spent on the overall scheme. 125 bus stops were available on the street upgraded to Quality Bus standards including raised „„Enhanced cleaning/maintenance through a kerbs, the majority with shelters (88), clearways dedicated telephone number to report faults and timetable information. „„All facilities were audited for security Source: Dianne Taylor, http://www.civitas-initiative.org

47 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 18: Improving bus and rail transit regulations and rules for public transport should be in Beijing strengthened by the supervision of the government on public transport, so as to promote the healthy, To achieve the prioritization of public transport, Bei- coordinated and sustainable development of the jing has adopted many measures for road construc- public transport industry in Beijing.” tion, optimization of the motorway network, vehicle Rail transit. By 2015, 19 routes will be inished, update, personalized services, ticketing, and policy thus forming a rail transit network with a length of and institutional reform in recent years. 561 km characterized as “three loops, four hori- Since economic reform and opening up, public zontals, ive verticals, and seven radiations.” transport has developed quickly in Beijing. How- Improving the “microcirculation” system. ever, with socioeconomic development, the urban- Strengthen the construction of sub-trunks and ising population, and the continuous expansion of branch routes, achieving 50% of the set planning, the city, urban trafic problems become increas- namely 270 km from 2006–2008. ingly serious. Trafic congestion and inconvenient travel are huge barriers to people’s normal life and Public transport station construction. Con- socioeconomic development. The modal share of duct repair or reconstruction on the 23 bus stations motor vehicles increased from 38% in 1986 to 61% located inside the fourth ring road with serous in 2003, while the modal share of public transport trafic congestion. The existing bus stations will decreased from 35% to 26%. be lengthened from 40 meters to 50 meters, and the large-scale bus stations lengthened from 80 Mr. Wang Qishan, Mayor of Beijing Municipality, meters to 100 meters. Moreover, the parking lanes described the blueprint for the future ive years of for buses are also marked, which prohibits the Beijing in his comments to the Fourth Session of intrusion of other vehicles. the Twelfth People’s Congress of Beijing in 2006. “We will prioritize the development of public trans- Optimizing public transport routes. Rational- port. The mileage of rail transit will reach 270 km, ize the allocation of public transport routes. With- and the modal share of public transport in down- draw 32 bus routes and adjust 147 bus stations town areas will reach 40%. Buses will travel through around the areas of Qianmen, Beijing Railway each administrative village. We will strengthen Station and Dongdan. Figure 59a, b the construction and maintenance of motorways, Reform ticketing system of public trans- and make sure all villages and towns are acces- port. In May of 2006, the public transport “IC Bus infrastructure sible to the motorway network. The land use for card” system has been carried out completely; in Beijing allows public transport facilities should be guaranteed passengers can use the card to take 8,000 buses, rapid boarding irst, and buses should enjoy the priority use of subways and 30,000 taxis. for convenience road resources. Public investment in transit should Source: Leilei Liu, http://www.cititas-initiative.org and accessibility. be given priority. Laws should be formulated and Photo by Armin Wagner, Beijing (CN), 2006

a b

48 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

of benches, route and schedule information at bus stops are also basics. Modern bus shelters Box 19: include high tech amenities like ticket automats Bremen’s “Transit plus Car” card and internet kiosks. Cities with buses equipped Launched in 1998, customers of Bremen’s public with telematics systems give passengers real- transport system were offered the “Transit plus time information about for bus arrival times. Car” card (Bremer Karte plus AutoCard) as a Using the same technology as that used for bus combination transit monthly or annual pass and prioritization, transponders on the bus commu- membership with the car sharing irm, StadtAuto. nicate with digital displays at bus stops which Customers receive a discount on their transit pass, but are charged a deposit and a one-time show its expected arrival time. his technology fee to join the car sharing service. They must can also allow passengers to check bus arrival also set up an account for car charges. Car use times on their cell phone. It is also important to is charged per hour and per kilometre travelled. consider the pedestrian environment around bus StadtAuto has shared cars located at 25 sta- stops, that is, the quality of the sidewalks and tions of the Bremen public transport system, road crossings which people use to access the where customers may transfer seamlessly from bus stop. Similar considerations apply to sta- a bus or streetcar to a shared car. A smart card tions where passengers wait for buses. It should is used to access the cars. be easy for passengers to ind route and schedule The Transit plus Car card was marketed information, and to igure out where to catch extensively through the media and on transit the bus they need. vehicles with advertisements and brochures. Two months after the start of the project, Stad- tAuto gained 150 new members to add to its 3.3 Car sharing base of 1,100, an increase of 14%. Some irms are directly involved in the busi- Source: Rainer Counen, http://www.eltis.org/studies ness of transportation demand management, such as car sharing irms. Organisations that rent cars to customers on an hourly basis — a practice known as car sharing — have sprung up in cities around the world. Car sharing irms make cars available to their members in speciic locations all around a city. Much like a library or video rental system, car sharing irms serve a customer base of members. his allows them to screen the driving records of their customers, for a group insurance policy. he hourly rental rate includes fuel and insurance costs. Most car sharing systems require members to reserve a particular car by using a website or phone res- ervation system. Members use a special key or chip card to open the car they have reserved. he main function of car sharing is to reduce the need to own a car. In developing countries, car sharing could help families with occasional car needs to retain a car-free lifestyle. It could become an intermediary status ofering custom- Figure 60 ers the glamour of car use, without the inan- Car sharing vehicle in Frankfurt. A variety cial burden of car ownership. In Bremen, the of diferent vehicle sizes are typically city’s new car sharing irm StadtAuto partnered ofered by car sharing organisations. with the local transit authority to build a cus- Photo by Armin Wagner, Frankfurt (DE), 2005 tomer base by linking transit use with shared cars (Box 19).

49 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

details please see Sourcebook Module 1: Eco- 4. Economic measures (“PUSH”) nomic Instruments http://www.sutp.org. Various economic measures are used to encour- Table 13 ranks common vehicle fees in terms of age eicient transportation, including pricing how well they represent the marginal costs of reforms and roadway facility management. vehicle use. he most economically eicient fees Many pricing measures are designed to capture vary by time and location, for example, charg- the externalized costs of travel, and so tend to ing more for driving under congested conditions increase economic eiciency. Pricing measures or for parking in an urban centre where land costs are high. Mileage-based fees and fuel taxes can generate revenue that can be used to improve relect the amount that a vehicle is driven but do mobility options or substitute for other taxes. not relect time or location. Fixed vehicle fees, Economic measures are often the most efective such as insurance and registration fees internal- components of a comprehensive TDM strategy, ize costs to vehicle owners as a group, but do not although they often face resistance from drivers relect the amount that a vehicle is used. his and so can be politically diicult to implement. is economically ineicient and results in cross- For these reasons it is important to implement subsidies between those who drive less than pricing reforms with clear goals for the revenue average, and therefore impose relatively low stream they create, sometimes accomplished costs, and those in the group who drive more through earmarking, (see Box 20). For further than average and impose higher costs.

Table 13: How well different fees represent marginal vehicle costs

Rank General Category Examples Time- and location-speciic Variable road pricing, location-speciic parking management, Best road and parking pricing location-speciic emission charges Weight-distance charges, mileage-based vehicle insurance, Second Mileage-pricing prorated motor vehicle excise tax (MVET), mileage-based best emission charges Third Increased fuel tax, general sales tax applied to fuel, pay-at- Fuel charges best the-pump insurance, carbon tax, and hazardous substance tax Bad Fixed vehicle charges Current MVET, vehicle purchase and ownership fees External costs General taxes paying for roads and trafic services, parking Worst (not charged to motorists) subsidies, uncompensated external costs

Box 20: Use of revenues from economic measures Sources of revenue from economic measures Earmarking: The allocation of revenues a speciic include: project or purpose. „„Surcharge on parking fee Trust Fund: Revenues can only be used for pur- „„Fuel tax surcharge poses deined by a set of criteria. „„Licensing fees/bounties Examples of projects and purposes funded by „„Business location licenses economic TDM measures include: „„Surcharge on terminal fees „„Financing better technology (scrapping of old How revenues are to be spent is a highly politi- cars, CNG buses); cal debate which is most often settled before the „„Financing non-motorised transport infrastruc- economic measure is implemented. Common ture improvements; mechanisms include earmarking the revenues „„Financing public awareness campaigns; for speciic projects or purposes, and creating „„Environmental trust fund (as exists in Mexico a trust fund, or “pot of money” which may be City, where revenues can only be used for spent for a variety of projects that meet a set of sustainable transportation measures). deined criteria. Source: Manfred Breithaupt, 2008

50 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 14: Economic instruments used as TDM measures

Table 1: Survey of economic incentive measures

Why should economic instruments be used? Economic instruments are characterised by their use of market forces, i.e. the price mechanism, to achieve policy objectives. Their use can be beneficial in developing cities for a number of reasons: 51 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 15: Economic Instruments in the OECD

Federal Implementation on… Local level level Differentiated fuel taxes (promote cleaner fuels)  7 Vehicle taxes (purchase, use, waste)   Property taxes, development levies 7  Road pricing (differentiated according to emissions, time, day, area, etc.)   Parking charges, taxes for parking 7  Subsidies for clean cars or for conversion   Fiscal incentives to remove older cars   Promoting/subsidizing public transport  

Source: Manfred Breithaupt, 2008

To be eicient, pricing policies should: Travel Behavior, Victoria Transport Policy „„Remove distortions by eliminating hidden Institute, http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf. and overt subsidies for private car users; „„Richard H. Pratt (1999–2007), Traveler „„Support sustainable transport modes; Response to Transportation System Changes, „„Create new local revenue sources which are TCRP Report 95, TRB, http://www.trb.org/ integrated into strategic planning; TRBNet/ProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=1034. „„Provide eicient, equitable, and sustainable Studies generally indicate that transportation is access for people to urban destinations; “inelastic” meaning that a price change causes Successful implementation of pricing strategies a proportionately smaller change in travel activ- depends upon: (from Breithaupt, 2008); ity. For example, a 10% fuel price increase „„Institutional/regulatory strength (enforce- typically reduces vehicle travel by 1% in the ment, monitoring, control abilities); short term and about 2% in the long term, if „„Price and income elasticities of demand all other factors (such as driver population and „„Removal of counter-productive subsidies (e.g. parking pricing) are held constant. However, for diesel fuel); this relects, in part, the fact that fuel represents „„Strategic considerations (e.g. competitiveness only about a quarter of total vehicle costs borne concerns); directly by consumers, so a 10% increase in „„Lobbying activities (e.g. preference for volun- fuel price only represents about a 2% increas- tary agreements, information dissemination, ing in total vehicle costs. Considering all costs, and widespread public support). automobile transportation is relatively price Diferent types of pricing reforms are imple- sensitive and can be considered “elastic” over mented by diferent levels of government (see the long run. Table 15). Some pricing strategies, such as of- he elasticity of vehicle travel depends on many street parking pricing and employee inancial factors, including the type of price change and incentives, may be implemented by private the alternatives available. In general, the better businesses. hey may be implemented as part the transport options available, the more sen- of larger market reforms, such as regulating bus sitive travel will be to prices. For example, if companies. he steps of implementation are dis- walking conditions and public transport services cussed in great detail in Sustainable Transport are of poor quality or unsafe, an increase in Sourcebook Module 1d: Economic Instruments. road tolls, fuel prices or parking fees will cause Many studies have examined how changes in relatively little reduction in vehicle travel, but if prices afect travel behaviour, including: walking conditions and public transport service „„Todd Litman (2005), Transportation Elas- are safe, convenient, and pleasant, travellers will ticities: How Prices and Other Factors Afect be more responsive to price changes.

52 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

4.1 Controlling car ownership growth 4.1.2 Annual registration/road fee Despite the expense of cars as luxury items, car In developed countries, car owners are com- ownership is growing rapidly in many develop- monly charged an annual or bi-annual fee which ing countries. Vehicle sales taxes, import duties, contributes to a road maintenance fund. he registration fees and taxes can afect the number level of the fee may be based on engine size, in and type of vehicles that residents purchase. order to encourage more fuel eicient vehicles. Quotas can also be used to limit vehicle owner- In the US, it is called a registration fee and ship, as discussed in Section 4.1.3. ranges from around US$30 to US$150 per year, and is enforced by a sticker displayed on vehicle 4.1.1 Sales tax/Import duty plates. In addition to a “road fee” for residents, Many countries impose a tarif, or import duty, many European countries require purchase of on foreign vehicles in order to favour those a “vignette” or time-based sticker which is sold which are domestically produced. A sales tax by the year, month, week, or day for the use of applies more broadly to all vehicles purchased. national roadways by residents of other countries. In some cases, lower sales taxes for fuel eicient vehicles are designed to encourage leet turno- Singapore’s road tax is diferentiated according ver, or replacement of older polluting vehicles, to engine size, fuel type, and type of vehicle to meet environmental quality objectives. (car, motorcycle, etc), in order to encourage Although these are not usually designed to sup- the use of low emission vehicles. Under this press vehicle purchase, they can be an efective system, a small car with a 1,000 cc engine may TDM measure if set high enough. In develop- pay US$600 per year, while one with a large ing countries, taxation measures are commonly 4,000 cc engine may pay over US$6,000. Diesel used, as illustrated by China’s multi-phased vehicles pay 6 times the amount by a similar vehicle tax policy in Table 16. gasoline car. Table 16: China’s multi-phase vehicle taxation

Type Tax or Fee Rate Tariff Excise Tax 3–5% Vehicle Purchase Value Added Tax 17% Vehicle Acquisition Tax 10% New Car Checkout Fee Vehicle Ownership Vehicle License Plate Fees Vehicle Usage Tax 60–320 RMB/year (US$8.70–46.80) Insurance Fee Vehicle Use Road Maintenance Fee 110–320 RMB/month (US$16–46.80) Consumption Tax 3–20% (by engine size)

Box 21: Tax incentive scheme to „„Emitting about 50% less hydrocarbons (HCs) and nitrogen oxides (NO ); improve air quality in Hong Kong X „„Consume 40% less fuel (measured by mileage A tax incentive scheme was introduced in April of travelled with one litre); 2007 in Hong Kong, with the aim of improving air Than conventional petrol Euro 4 cars. quality by encouraging the use of environmental- „„ friendly petrol private cars with low emissions and The Environmental Protection Department (EDP) high fuel eficiency. The program offers a 30% will review the qualifying standards annually in reduction of the First Registration Tax (FRT) to the light of technological advancement (current buyers of newly registered environmental-friendly standards are published on EDP website: http:// petrol private cars, subject to a cap of HK$50,000 www.epd.gov.hk/epd). per car (US$6,452). Adapted from: Manfred Breithaupt (2008), “Environmental Vehicle Taxation: International Experiences”, presented at the Cars must meet the following criteria to qualify International Workshop on Integrated Transport for Sustainable as environmental-friendly: Urban Development in China (15–17 December 2008)

53 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 17: German vehicle tax for passenger cars

Tax per 100 ccm in € Tax per 100 ccm in € Emission Group for GASOLINE cars for DIESEL cars Euro 3, Euro 4 and 6.75 15.44 “3 litre car“ Euro 2 7.36 16.5 Euro 1 15.13 27.35 Euro 0 (formerly without 21.07 33.29 ozone ban on driving) Other Passenger Cars 25.36 37.58

Adapted from: Manfred Breithaupt (2008), “Environmental Vehicle Taxation: International Experiences”, presented on the International Workshop on Integrated Transport for Sustainable Urban Development in China (15–17 December 2008) 4.1.3 Car quota he nation of Singapore implemented a quota system to limit the number of cars which may be sold and registered in a given year. he system auctions a limited number of Certiicates of Entitlement (COE), which allow a resident to purchase and register a vehicle. his TDM measure has been extremely efective at limit- ing the growth of private vehicle traic as the nation’s prosperity has grown.

The Vehicle Quota System in Singapore this period, the vehicle needs to be deregistered or the COE has to be renewed by paying a Prevail- Singapore’s Vehicle Quota System (VQS), which ing Quota Premium (PQP), which is the 3 months’ came into effect in May 1990, is part of a series of moving average of the QP. measures to optimize trafic low by managing the growth of vehicle ownership to acceptable levels. The Quota Year (QY) starts in May and ends Under the VQS, motor vehicles are classiied into in April of the following year. In the QY 2008, the several categories, with a separate licence quota total quota was originally set at 115,946 COEs, but for each category. For categories A, B, and D, the reduced during the September 2008 mid-quota licence is non-transferable. year review to 110,354. For the QY 2009, the total quota is ixed at 83,789 COEs. This igure takes The Land Transport Authority (LTA) determines into account a 1.5% vehicle growth based on the quota for each category every year. In order to the vehicle population as at 31 December 2008, register a new vehicle, the would-be-buyer must replacements of vehicles expecting to be dereg- bid for and obtain a licence, referred to oficially istered in 2009, and adjustment for any over/ as a Certiicate of Entitlement (COE). The COEs under-estimation of vehicle deregistration in the can be obtained through an auction, the COE previous year. electronic Open Bidding System, which is held twice a month (fortnightly). The Quota Premium The COE Open Bidding System is conducted (QP) represents the price for a COE. The QP is annually online where users may monitor prices the price of the highest unsuccessful bid plus $1 in real-time and place or revise bids by phone or for that category e.g, if there are 250 in the quota computer. A bid represents the maximum amount for a particular category for that fortnight, the that a person is willing to pay for a COE of a spe- QP is the bid price of the 251st ranked bid plus $1, ciic category. The top bids up to the amount of which everyone whose bids rank from 1 to 250 COEs available under the quota are accepted and pays. Bidders who successfully obtain a COE have automatically paid from the bidder’s account. The to register the vehicle within 3 (for categories C license is valid for 10 years. After this period the and E) and 6 months (for categories A, B and D) vehicle needs to be deregistered or the license respectively. The COE is valid for 10 years. After has to be renewed by paying a Prevailing Quota

54 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Premium (PQP), which is the 3 months moving engines less than 1600 cc were the most popu- average of the license premium (QP). In 1999, the lar category with 2,722 received bids for 1,846 average premium for the smallest cars (less than COEs and a price of $4,460. Category E, an open 1,000 cc) was US$27,367, and US$30,566 for the category for registration of all types of vehicles, largest cars. shows the highest price with $5,889. The PQP for The results of the second COE Annual Open category A vehicles is $4,516. Bidding process for February 2009, are shown in In total, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) Table 18. The total quota available for this tender received 6,957 bids. 4,383 were successful while was set at 4,415 vehicles. Cars and taxis with 2,574 were rejected.

Table 18: COE open bidding results of Singapore’s 2nd quota auction in February 2009 Final results for February 2009 2nd open bidding exercise Category Quota QP (US$) PQP (US$) A Car (<= 1600 cc) & Taxi 1 846 4 460 4 516 B Car (> 1600 cc) 1 101 4 889 3 004 C Goods Vehicle & Bus 272 4 190 3 733 D Motorcycle 434 801 928 E Open 762 5 889 NA QP: Quota Premium PQP: Prevailing Quota Premium (a moving average of the QP over the last 3 months)

Category Received Successful Unsuccessful Unused A Car (<= 1600 cc) & Taxi 2 722 1 842 880 4 B Car (> 1600 cc) 1 675 1 090 585 11 C Goods Vehicle & Bus 403 271 132 1 D Motorcycle 650 434 216 0 E Open 1 507 746 761 16 Received: Total Bids Received Unused: Unused Quota carried forward

Source: Land Transport Authority (http://www.onemotoring.com.sg); Gopinath Menon (2009).

4.2 Reducing car use national, state/provincial or local governments. A variety of economic measures can afect driver For example in the U.S., the federal fuel tax for behaviour and reduce single-occupant vehicle gasoline and diesel of US$0.048 and US$0.064 trips. Economic measures that reduce vehicle per litre, respectively, is dedicated to all sur- use provide price signals to drivers based on the face transportation modes, from motorways to marginal cost of vehicle use, that is, the more a public transport to bicycle and pedestrian trails. person drives, the more they pay out of pocket. he additional state tax (average state fuel tax of Such measures include fuel taxes, road tolls and $0.07 per litre) is limited to roadway purposes parking fees. in 36 states. However, this level of fuel taxation is too low to function as a TDM measure, nor is 4.2.1 Fuel tax that an aim of U.S. fuel taxation. Most countries charge fuel taxes, as shown in In Europe, where policy makers do aim to Figure 61. Such taxes can be considered a gen- reduce car use through fuel taxation, the eral tax or a road user fee. Fuel tax revenues tax levels are much higher. In Germany, for are generally used for transportation purposes, instance, drivers pay a federal fuel tax equiva- and in some cases are strictly limited to the lent to US$0.81 per litre gasoline and US$0.58 road network. Fuel taxes may be charged by per litre diesel. Empirical results from OECD

55 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 61 Russian Federation Comparison of 66 77 regional fuel prices.

77 96 Kazakhstan 45 70 Mongolia 89 86 87 88 Georgia 41 46 Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan 79 71 Azerbaijan Turkey Armenia 54 85 54 64 North Korea 162 188 Turkmenistan Tadjikistan Japan 1 2 74 80 South 62 74 13 60 Korea Syria 90 109 Lebanon Iran Afghanistan People’s Republic of China Palestine Iraq 133 165 Jordan 3 9 65 68 61 69 Israel 73 94 Pakistan 45 86 Nepal Bhutan Kuwait Bahrain 64 101 71 83 India 102 117 127 147 21 22 Qatar U.A.E. 75 101 Bangladesh Macao Taiwan Saudi Arabia 13 21 Hong Myanmar Hawaii 98 129 45 79 Lao PDR Kong 106 169 7 16 19 19 Oman 73 86 88 76 53 37 75 66 Yemen Thailande Philippines 39 31 65 70 Cambodia Vietnam 28 30 67 76 78 101 53 67 Brunei Sri Lanka l a y M a s i a 21 34 55 88 Singapor 40 53

o n e Papua d s i n a New I 44 57 Guinea 63 92 Timor Leste 88 98

82 81 Samoa 94 107 Fiji Tahiti Reading Example: Retail Price 119 149 Tonga US-Cents per Litre 109 103 Diesel62 87 Super Gasoline Australia 94 93 Very High Fuel Subsidies Fuel Subsidies Fuel Taxation

Very High Fuel Taxation 70 98 New Zealand

Source: Armin Wagner (2008), “Fuel taxation as an economic instrument to tackle climate change”, presentation Bangkok 14.11.2008, http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/gtz2008-en-fuel-taxation.pdf experience indicate that gasoline price changes 4.2.2 Road pricing have a very long reaction horizon (short run he practice of charging drivers a direct fee for elasticity of -0.05 to -0.1). Yet in the long run, road space is known as road pricing. Fees may be say ten years, price elasticity is roughly double. charged to drive within a certain area or per kil- hus fuel prices must rise faster than inlation ometre on certain roads. he aims of road pric- and income rates of growth in order to have an ing schemes are to: reduce traic volumes and efective demand management efect. pollution, increase eicient use of road capacity, For more information on international fuel to generate revenues for public transport, and prices see http://www.gtz.de/en/themen/umwelt- to mitigate the environmental impacts of traic infrastruktur/transport/10285.htm. GTZ pro- congestion. As a public policy, it has been imple- duces biannual worldwide fuel price surveys, mented with targeted purposes such as reducing with the next comprehensive report expected traic congestion at certain times or in certain in April 2009. (here is also a regular monthly areas, or with the general purposes of recover- newsletter, which you can sign up for on the ing costs of road construction and repairs, or website). to inance public transport improvements. Fees

56 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

may be charged by time of day, by vehicle type, Toll roads create a revenue stream from users or by distance travelled, depending on the goals that can pay the debt associated with major of the road pricing scheme. infrastructure projects, allowing them to pay he key factor that has made road pricing a fea- for themselves over time. his gets around the sible solution to road congestion in recent years chicken and egg issue of transport investment is the availability of new technologies that make — we cannot invest if we do not have revenue, it feasible to realize pricing road use based on but we will not have revenue if we do not time, distance, and place. Common objectives invest. he level of the toll is calculated based of road pricing schemes are: on projected traic volumes and the terms of „„To deliver a more eicient transport pricing; debt repayment. Vehicles are typically charged „„To be fair, respect privacy, and promote social based on distance travelled on a toll road, or per inclusion and accessibility; bridge crossing on a toll bridge. „„To deliver higher economic growth and A recent practice is for a government to sell productivity; the rights to revenue collection to a third- „„To deliver environmental beneits. party operator, known as a “concessionaire”, New technologies have made it possible to who is also responsible for maintenance and collect fees from drivers without requiring operations. his form of public private partner- vehicles to stop at a toll plaza. Fees may be paid ship is in widespread use throughout France, electronically with on-board units (OBUs) or Spain, Malaysia, and other countries where the chip cards while vehicles are in traic, or by national roadway system is owned and operated more traditional means at pay stations. Older by several regional concessionaires. toll roads that collect fares using coin machines Some toll systems are designed to cross-subsi- or attendants have a capacity limited to 300 dize investment in public transport. For exam- vehicles per hour per lane, which reduces the ple, in Norway, several cities have toll rings, or eicient performance of the roadway. New auto- cordons, which charge vehicles as they enter mated toll collection uses electronic transpond- a central area. Voters in Oslo approved a toll ers mounted on overhead gantries using Direct cordon whose revenues are dedicated to a set of Short Range Communication (DSRC). Illus- speciic projects, including road improvements, trated in Figure 62, this system keeps traic free extending a central rail line, and re-aligning lowing, increasing roadway capacity to 1600 trams to connect with the central rail station. vehicles per hour per lane or higher. he most About half of the toll revenues are used for road modern satellite-based GPS toll collection sys- projects, and 20% for public transport improve- tems are capable of collecting tolls for road use ments. About 250,000 vehicles pay the toll each or parking anywhere, anytime, eliminating the day, mainly by the 50% of Oslo’s population need for near-roadside infrastructure altogether. which lives outside the cordon. Motorists know 4.2.2.1 Toll roads what they are paying for when they pay the toll, which has greatly helped public acceptability. he traditional method for inancing new roads, he level of the toll is based on what is needed bridges, and public transport is using fuel tax revenues. he fuel tax is paid by road users, to repay project debt and operating costs over a and therefore also a form of road pricing. Fuel 15 year period. taxes have also historically been used to pay Many European countries charge vehicles for for road and bridge maintenance. However, in use of national roadways using automated toll many developed countries, aging and outdated collection systems. For example, Germany motorways and bridges have increased transport charges a toll for heavy goods vehicles (e.g. system costs to a stage where needs are so great lorries over 12 tons) using its 12,000 km auto- that new sources of inancing are needed. Espe- bahn network. A new technology was deployed cially where political factors have kept fuel taxes for this purpose, using satellite technology. low, the fuel tax alone is insuicient to pay for Introduced in 2003, the toll collection system the extent of road and public transport improve- uses Global Positioning System (GPS) and ments needed. on-board units to charge lorries an average toll

57 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 62 Oslo’s Cordon Road Automated toll Laser Charging System collection system. detection and DSRC

Rear camera

Front camera

Source: Kristian Wærst, Norwegian Public Roads Administration

of €0.12 per kilometre with 50% toll premium least able to pay, or who may have no choice for older more polluting lorries. he opera- but to drive. For instance, low-paid service tor Toll Collect is a public private partnership workers may work at locations or start their with a consortium of German companies shift at times when public transport service handling various aspects of operation, such as is not available. Road pricing schemes which Deutsche Telekom and Siemens. With over charge a lat fee can function as a regressive 500,000 on-board units in operation, the tax, that is, falling more heavily on poor drivers system processes over 1 million transactions than on the rich. Economists call this an issue per day. In 2006, over €2.6 billion of toll rev- of distributional equity — the most eicient enue was collected, which was used to pay for tax is not necessarily the most equitable. It road maintenance. he scheme charges cleaner should be considered when designing the pric- vehicles lower fees, leading to a 10% increase ing of a new scheme, but the initial impacts in registrations of low-emission lorries. Road will decline over time as people adjust to the pricing has also caused hauliers to increase new price regime, and make changes to mini- their eiciency and productivity. An indicator mise their expenses. his process is assisted by of such optimization is the share of “empty phasing in new schemes over a gradual and trips”, that is, where lorries make return trips predictable timeframe. without a load, which has fallen by 20% since Ultimately, whether road pricing is regressive introduction of the toll. depends on how much the charged roads are Similar road pricing schemes targeting lorries used by lower-income drivers, the quality of on national roadways are in operation in Swit- travel alternatives, and how revenues are used. zerland and Austria. he Netherlands is poised Schemes may be more progressive by providing to become the irst country to implement a discounts or a limited quantity of free passes for national road pricing scheme which will apply low-income households to preserve afordability. to all vehicles and all roads. he irst phase is Local governments should consider the issue of planned for launch in 2009, accompanied by disproportionate impacts in designing any road reductions in vehicle taxes. pricing scheme. Public acceptability depends Road pricing has been criticized for dispropor- on the relative size of the groups who beneit or tionately afecting those people who are the sufer, as summarized in Table 19.

58 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 19: Winners and losers of road pricing

Direct winners Direct losers „„ Bus and rideshare travellers who enjoy „„ Lower income motorists who pay the toll, because improved service due to reduced congestion they have no travel alternative, but do not value and economies of scale; their time savings as much; „„ Wealthier motorists who value their travel „„ Road users on un-tolled roads who experience time savings more than their toll costs; increased congestion; „„ Recipients of toll revenues. „„ Motorists who forego trips due to tolls; „„ Motorists who shift to other routes to avoid tolls; „„ Motorists who shift to transit or other modes due to tolls (although improved service from economies of scale may make some net winners).

Excerpted from Gomez-Ibanez, 1992. 4.2.2.2 Congestion pricing Economists expect that increasing the cost of Both toll roads and congestion pricing charge city access should result in two types of efects. drivers for road usage. However, the funda- he ‘income efect’ is a result of motorists mental diference is that congestion charging is paying the congestion charge having less dispos- a traic management measure targeted for the able income for retail purchases. he ‘substitu- purpose of reducing traic congestion. A toll tion efect’ is a result of motorists choosing road operator would like to see an increase in to make purchases outside the charging zone, the use of his road, because it brings in larger redistributing economic activity. he viability of revenues and will adjust his toll rate accordingly. a city centre shopping district over time depends he primary objective is to generate revenues for in large part on whether new shopping areas road maintenance. A congestion pricing opera- are allowed to proliferate on the edges of urban tor is indiferent to road use and prefers to see areas. his in turn depends on the quality of his charges reduce road usage, thus road pricing regional planning and the political will to stick rates are adjusted for reducing usage. Congestion charging is a type of road pricing with higher fees under congested conditions as a way to reduce traic volumes to optimal levels. Ideally, the charging system should vary over time and location, with the highest fees under for the most congested times, for example, adjusting every ifteen minutes, giving travellers an incentive to shift from the maximum peak to slightly of-peak (called “shoulder”) periods. A concern about congestion charging is that making a city centre more expensive to access by car will drive shoppers away and hurt retail- ers. here is some evidence that the opposite is true in the short term: the improved quality the shopping environment has drawn people and sales have grown. However, long term efects are diicult to predict. he Singapore experience Figure 63 shows that if the congestion pricing scheme Congestion charging in operates for the whole day, there may be some Stockholm, with prices negative business impacts. But negative retail varying during the day efects were partly overcome by improvement in based on peak demand. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, public transport services to the city. Stockholm (SE), 2006

59 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

to growth management plans. It also depends vehicles passing the congestion charge bound- on whether local congestion charge schemes ary points. Unlike other types of road pricing are incorporated into a national system of road schemes, congestion charges are only in efect pricing. during peak times of congestion. here are several speciic ways to implement he design and technology of congestion pric- congestion charging: ing schemes ranges from low-tech to state-of- „„Cordon ring: A fee is paid when a vehicle the-art. he most basic payment system is a toll crosses a cordon to enter a central area, usu- collector in a booth, where vehicles must stop ally only during peak hours. to pay. Modern schemes ofer frequent users „„Area license: Vehicles purchase a day license the option of using an on-board unit (OBU), to enter a central area. installed in the vehicle, which communicates „„Corridor: Vehicles using a speciic road, lane, electronically with units mounted on over- tunnel or bridge are charged a fee. head gates over the roadway, called gantries. „„Network: Vehicles are charged a per-kilome- his type of scheme is called a tag and beacon tre fee for use of entire road network, or por- system. Vehicles must slow down, but not stop, tion of the network (e.g. national motorways) to pay, which saves motorists time, and they are Table 20 summarizes common congestion pric- less expensive to operate due to fewer staf. Tag ing schemes implemented in Europe. he design and beacon systems are in operation in many of a congestion pricing scheme must ensure that European countries, such as France, Spain, vehicles are unable to evade the charge. he Portugal, Italy, and Germany. most common design is a cordon ring, where Singapore was the irst city to introduce conges- a circle is drawn around the area targeted for tion pricing in 1975. It was a cordon scheme congestion relief, and the charge is applied to known as the Area Licensing Scheme. A central vehicles crossing this perimeter. Physical fea- area within a cordon was termed the Restricted tures which help to limit access to the charged Zone, and tolls were enforced using a simple zone are often incorporated. For instance, the low-tech paper license. It quickly proved suc- boundaries of the Stockholm scheme are the cessful in reducing traic congestion and caus- Figure 64 rivers surrounding the city centre, with the ing a modal shift to public transport. In 1998, An overhead gantry charge applied to vehicles crossing bridges to the system was modernized to be fully auto- controls the congestion access it. Drivers may pay the charge by a vari- matic, with a state-of-the-art Electronic Road charge in Stockholm. ety of methods, and the scheme is enforced by Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Pricing System using DSRC technology and all Stockholm (SE), 2006 cameras monitoring the registration plates of vehicles itted with In-vehicle Units (IUs). Con- gestion pricing charges are deducted automati- cally from smart cards as the vehicle goes under an overhead control gantry. he most modern version of road pricing are network charging schemes, which are compre- hensive systems capable of charging motorists for travel on an entire road network. Network charging schemes treat road use like the con- sumption of other public utility service, such as water or electricity. Network charging comes closest to the ideal road pricing system described above, where the price of road use varies accord- ing to construction and maintenance costs, pollution and noise costs, and the costs of delays to other drivers when road space is in high demand. hus road users get a direct price signal about how much their trip imposes costs upon society, and may adjust travel accordingly.

60 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 65 Figure 66 Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) Short-range radio communication system is gantry automatically deducts payment from used to deduct ERP charges automatically. CashCards inside In-vehicle Units (IUs). Photo by Karl Otta, Singapore, 2004 Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, Singapore, 2003

Table 20: Types of congestion pricing systems

Cordon ring Area license Corridor Network Description: All vehicles entering a All vehicles operating All vehicles using tolled Vehicles pay for each certain central city zone within a central city area road, bridge, or tunnel kilometre travelled on a deined by a cordon are during certain times are pay a lat fee. In some road network. Fees may charged a lat fee when charged a daily fee. cases, the fee changes be differentiated by type they cross the boundary at dynamically based on of vehicle, emissions class, peak use times. peak use times. roads used, and/or peak use times. Aims: Reduce trafic congestion Reduce trafic congestion Reduce congestion on the Reduce congestion, in central area in central area corridor (also inance a increase eficiency speciic road or bridge) (also inance transport infrastructure) Technology: DSRC, Toll plazas and/or Plate-recognition cameras Toll plazas and/or tag On-board units and GPS plate-recognition cameras and beacon system with satellites on-board units Financing: Public Public Public and Private Public and Private

Operator: Public Public Public or Concessionaire Concessionaire

Revenues Road and public transport Public transport Road improvements Road, railway and public used for: improvements/other public improvements transport improvements projects In use: Bergen, Durham, Florence, London Czech Republic, England, Austria, Germany Kristiansand, Namsos, France, Greece, Italy, (lorries on autobahn) Oslo, Rome, Singapore, Portugal, Spain Switzerland Stavanger, Stockholm, (lorries on all roads) Tonsbjerg, Tromso, Planned: Netherlands Trondheim, Valletta

Excerpted from Transport & Environment, 2007.

61 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 22: London’s congestion charge (TfL, 2007). An extra 300 buses were introduced on the same day. Although London already had In February of 2003, Mayor Ken Livingston intro- a relatively high share of commuters using public duced London’s Congestion Charge as a meas- transport, it further increased signiicantly. ure to address trafic congestion in the central city — the worst in the UK in terms of driver delay. As of 2007, London remains the largest city in Drivers in central London spent an estimated 50% the world to have adopted a congestion charge of their time in queues, adding up to a time loss model. The organisation responsible for the charge of £2–4 million every week (TfL, 2007). The aims is Transport for London (TfL), in conjunction with of the congestion charging scheme were to dis- a private operator. The congestion charge is a lat courage the use of private cars, reduce conges- fee charged to motorists within a central London tion, and support investment in public transport. area, deined by a cordon. It is an area charging It is considered a success for having achieved scheme, meaning that motorists crossing the these aims. cordon are charged, as well as vehicles operating entirely within the zone. The cordon was initially The effects of the congestion charge were limited to the eastern business districts of London, immediate and dramatic. In the irst two days, but was extended to include western residential trafic levels fell by 25%, and drivers reported that boroughs in February of 2007. The charged zone journey times were reduced by as much as half is an area of approximately 8 square miles.

When launched, the congestion charge was previous year. Around 50–60% of this reduction £5; since 2005, the charge is £8. Vehicles are was attributed to trips shifted to public transport, charged upon entry to the congestion charge zone 20–30% to journeys avoiding the zone, and the between 7:00 and 18:00. The scheme is enforced remainder to car-sharing, reduced number of by ANPR plate-recognition cameras monitoring trips, more travelling outside the hours of opera- vehicles within the zone. Non-compliant vehicles tion, and increased use of motorbikes and cycles. are automatically mailed a penalty. Journey times were reduced by 15%. In 2006, TfL The trafic-reduction effect of the congestion found that congestion reductions and journey time charge has remained consistent over time. In saving effects remained in place. Congestion was 2003, TfL assessed the irst six months of the still reduced by about 26% in comparison with the charge and found that the number of cars enter- pre-charge period. ing the central zone was 60,000 less than the Source: Commission for Integrated Transport, 2008

62 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 23: effect until 31 July 2006, at which point the City Stockholm’s congestion charge conducted an evaluation in preparation to put the matter to a public vote. The evaluation showed that The City of Stockholm, Sweden adopted a conges- trafic during peak hours fell by 22%, exceeding the tion charge in August of 2007 after a trial process city’s goal. Displacement trafic on the bypass road to test the effects of the scheme. Facing a conges- was lower than feared, only 4–5%, and also minor tion problem degrading the economy and quality of on ring roads. Of the approximately 80,000 fewer life, Stockholm leaders also realised that their road daily car passages across the charging cordon, expansion options were limited. They determined more than half were found to be work or school that supply-side measures, such as ring roads trips. These trips were made by public transport or expanded public transport service, came with instead, with passenger counts showing a 6% high costs and limited beneit to relieve pressure increase from spring of 2005 to 2006. on the road network, saying “Trafic congestion is The trial scheme was considered a success for a big-city phenomenon that cannot be removed improving access to the city centre. Travel times fell through investments in roads or public transport.” dramatically, particularly on approach roads to the (City of Stockholm, 2006) centre city, where queue times fell by a third in the A trial congestion charging scheme was devel- morning peak, and were halved in the afternoon. oped with four aims: to reduce vehicles entering the Increased productivity due to shorter travel times centre city at peak hours by 10–15%, to improve was calculated as a beneit of 600 million SEK per access on Stockholm’s busiest roads, to reduce year, or US$23 million. Commercial vehicles, buses,

CO2 and other vehicle emissions, and to gain a and drivers of company cars especially beneited perceived improvement in the street-level quality from better travel-time reliability. of life for city residents. Fewer vehicles in the city centre meant low-

The Stockholm Trial began in July of 2005, ered CO2, NO2, and particulate emissions. Carbon with expanded public transport services. New dioxide emissions fell by 14%. Harder to measure bus routes, more rail frequent service, and new were related positive effects on public health, road park-and-rides were introduced in advance of the safety, and the perception of city environment qual- congestion charge. The irst day that vehicles were ity. Polls showed that public attitudes changed in charged was 3 January 2006. The fee remained in favour of the congestion charge over the period of

Source: City of Stockholm, 2006

63 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

the trial as people experienced its effects. A poll in A referendum on whether to adopt the conges- the fall of 2005 showed a baseline negative attitude, tion charge was held in the County of Stockholm with 51% of county residents saying a congestion in conjunction with the general elections on 17 charge was a “fairly/very bad decision”. By May September 2006. The issue was on the ballot in the of 2006, only 42% still held that opinion, with 54% City of Stockholm and 14 surrounding municipali- responding that the charge was a “fairly/very good” ties. With a high percentage of voters participating decision, (City of Stockholm, 2006). (76%), a majority of city residents (53%) voted in An important inding during the trial period was favour of keeping the congestion charge, while it that improved public transport service by itself had failed in the surrounding areas. It fell to the National very little impact on trafic congestion. Expanded Parliament to make the inal decision, and they transit services were introduced six months in voted in June 2007 to implement the congestion advance of the congestion charge, allowing Stock- charge permanently. It has been in effect since holm’s transport managers to measure the effects 1 August 2007. on trafic congestion. They concluded that, “Of Designed as a cordon scheme, Stockholm’s the 22% decrease in car travel across the charge system charges vehicles a fee of as they enter and zone, only 0.1% at most could have been caused exit the charging ring. The fee is charged during by the expanded bus services,” (City of Stockholm, morning and afternoon peak hours, but varies from 2006). They named the fee as the reason that driv- 10–20 Swedish Kronors (US$0.25–0.75) depending ers made the switch, “The congestion tax seems on the exact time. It is enforced using automated to have caused an increase in travel by public number plate recognition cameras (ANPR). transport by approximately 4.5%.”

Box 24: Travel impacts of Stockholm’s by 22%. Public transport and retail sales rose by congestion charge 8% and 10% respectively. The congestion charge did not harm the business, in contrary; business Next to a significant reduction of traffic (25% has increased the number of Mass Transit users peak hour congestion was successfully reduced by 40,000/day. (Michele Dix, 2006) + 8% 10%

Public Peak Hour Air Retail Trafic Transport Congestion Pollution Sales Ridership

-14% -22% -25% –

Adapted from: Manfred Breithaupt (2008), “Environmental Vehicle Taxation: International Experiences”, presented on the International Workshop on Integrated Transport for Sustainable Urban Development in China (15–17 December 2008)

64 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 25: scheduled buses and emergency vehicles) Singapore’s congestion charge were withdrawn. „„January 1994 when the whole day ALS (7:30– The oldest and perhaps most well-known conges- 17:00) was introduced with separate peak hour tion charging scheme is Singapore’s Congestion and lower off-peak hour fees. Pricing Scheme. The objective was to charge Throughout the years, there were also enlarge- vehicles at places and at times where and when ments in the area of the RZ and in the price of they caused congestion. The revenues were not licences. From 1975–98, the city area has grown earmarked for transport purposes but went into a by about 30% in terms of area with increases in general consolidated fund. Transport projects on employment and commercial activity. The vehicle road and urban rail had to be justiied economi- population has increased by 245% from 276,866 at cally to obtain funds to carry out. beginning of 1974 to 677,818 in mid-1997 over the The first congestion pricing scheme, intro- same period. Yet trafic conditions in the city roads duced in June 1975, was called the Area Licens- were better than what it was in 1975. The average ing Scheme (ALS). An imaginary cordon was trafic speeds in the city during the working day placed around the most congested parts of the varied from 26–35 km/h, as compared with about city, termed the Restricted Zone (RZ), an area of 15–20 km/h prior to implementation of ALS. 720 hectares. Each of the 33 entry points to the In 1975, the public transport share of the work RZ had an overhead gantry sign with the word trips to the city was 46%. In 1998, it was 67%. “Restricted Zone”. To enter this area during the With the gradually increasing patronage, public period of 7:30–10:15 on weekdays and Saturdays, transport operators had been able to improve cars and taxis needed to purchase and display an their services. There has also been a fundamental area license. These paper licenses which came in shift in the attitude to the car. True that the car is daily (US$2.20 daily) and monthly (US$43 monthly) still a much-sought after commodity by many, but forms had to be displayed clearly on the vehicle public transport has become a respectable and windscreens. The licenses were distinguishable acceptable alternative. from each other by shape and colour. Licenses were available at post ofices, convenience stores, ALS started off in 1975 in a simple manner by petrol stations and at special license sales booths having restrictions for cars and taxis only, during set up along the approach roads to the RZ. They the morning peak hours. As it was subsequently could not be purchased at the entry points. extended to cover the whole day with different rates for different vehicle classes and lower rates during Cars and taxis carrying four persons (car pools) the off-peak hours, the number of licenses mush- including the driver were given free entry. Police roomed. While the regular motorists who bought personnel were stationed in sentry huts at the licences often had no problems, the occasional entry points. They observed whether the vehicles user faced confusion. The motorist had a choice of were displaying the correct area licenses as they 14 licences to choose from, which was considered passed the entry points. Offending vehicles were too many. With the ALS it was dificult to change not stopped, but their particulars were taken down the area and the times of restriction and they received a summons for entering the RZ without a valid license. The penalty was US$50. With the paper license, motorists could make an Escape routes were provided at the main entry unlimited number of entries into the controlled area. points to ensure that vehicles were not forced This was not keeping in the spirit of the concept unwittingly to enter the RZ. There was no policing of congestion pricing, which was meant to make within the RZ. Vehicles were free to move around the driver pay for the use of the road at times and and leave the RZ. places when and where they cause congestion. The fairest way would be to make the motorist pay The three main milestones until 1998 (when each time he uses the controlled area. ALS was replaced by the Electronic Road Pric- ing ERP) were: Therefore, a search for an automatic alternative „„June 1975 when the morning ALS was intro- started in 1989 when technologies for electronic duced for cars and taxis only, with exemption toll collection started appearing. This is how the given to other vehicles and carpools. Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) started. „„June 1989 when the ALS scheme was also The ERP system introduced in 1998 is a dedi- extended to the evening (16:30–19:00); cated short-range radio communication system and all exemptions (for other than public (DSRC) using a 2.54 GHz band. There are three

65 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

components, namely: the vehicle, the new balance in the CashCard after „„The In-vehicle Unit (IU) with the smart card the deduction of the ERP charge is displayed for called CashCard 10 seconds. At the same time, the optical sensor „„ERP gantries (or control points) located at the detects the passage of the vehicle. If there has same points as the control points for ALS been a valid ERP transaction i.e. the correct ERP charge has been deducted, this information is „„A control centre where the system is monitored stored in the local controller. by enforcement personnel The IU is a pocket dictionary sized device pow- If there has not been a valid transaction for ered by the vehicle battery and which is itted some reason, the enforcement camera takes permanently to the windscreen of vehicles, and a digital image of the rear license plate of the on the lower right hand corner or handlebars of vehicle, recording the reason, i.e. no CashCard motorcycles and scooters. In the database of IUs, etc, and also stores this information at the local each unique IU number is tied to the registration controller. The local controller sends back all the number of the vehicle to which it is afixed. The ERP transaction data and digital images to the IU has a slot for receiving a prepaid stored value control centre at regular intervals. contact smart card. The smart card, called the The records of valid ERP transactions are stored CashCard, is issued and managed by a consor- for a day and at the end of which, they are used tium of local banks. The CashCard is reusable (for to claim the total ERP charges from the CashCard about 2–3 years) and can be topped up in cash operator. The violation/error images are kept for value to a maximum value of US$500 at petrol a period of 6 months, as they may need to be stations or automatic teller machines. used if drivers challenge the summons issued The IU has a backlit liquid crystal display. It for violations. displays the CashCard balance when the card is As in the case of ALS, ERP has proven to be inserted into the IU and the remaining balance after reliable and has been successful in keeping traf- the deduction of a charge when the vehicle goes ic congestion in the controlled area to manage- under an ERP gantry. These displays only last for able levels. 10 seconds and then the screen goes blank. As The demand price elasticity igures for cars vary the vehicle approaches within 10 metres of the between -0.12 and -0.35. The elasticity igures for irst antenna of the ERP gantry, the antennae inter- motorcyclists vary between -0.7 and -2.8. Motor- rogates the IU, determines its validity, classiies cyclists appear to be sensitive to price changes, the vehicle according to the IU and instructs it to while car drivers tend to be less affected by price deduct the appropriate ERP charge, which it looks changes. This sensitivity may be partly explained up and determines from a charge table resident by the fact that car owners tend to be generally in in the local controller. Between the two gantries, a higher income bracket that the motorcyclists. the IU deducts the appropriate charge from the Source: Various reports on ALS and ERP by A P G Menon and stored value of the CashCard and conirms that it Chin Kian Keong, (1992–2004) has done so to the second antenna. On the IU of

4.2.3 Low emission zones at irst wary of such traic restrictions, have TDM policy measures which restrict car access found that an increase of foot traic is good for are often closely related to other policy goals, business. such as reducing vehicle emissions and increas- Low Emission Zones are most often created ing road space for other users. For example, around the historic city core. An example is some European cities have elected to create Low Bologna, where city leaders decided to pedestri- Emission Zones which limit access to cars of a anise the city’s historic central Piazza Maggiore certain low pollution class, or restrict all cars (although buses are allowed) and limit traic from heavily traicked central areas during peak in the surrounding area to permitted vehi- use hours. Besides encouraging use of public cles. Delivery vehicle access is only permitted transport and non-motorised modes to access during certain morning and afternoon hours, Low Emission Zones, improved air quality and when retractable bollards allow passage. On noise levels make them all the more attrac- Sundays, vehicle circulation is prohibited from tive for visitors and residents. Business owners, 9:30–12:00 and from 15:30–18:30 in a “Zona a

66 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 26: in three stages, and must display Low emission zones in a permit sticker (‘Vignette’). Germany The low emission zones in Umwelt Berlin, Hannover, and Cologne An emission zone cannot be con- became effective on 1 Janu- sidered as a tax. It is a restriction ary 2008. Since then, all major scheme for polluting vehicles. In German cities have followed. ZONE Germany, low emission zones Vehicles are classiied in four dif- were implemented as areas from ferent classes based on the Euro which highly polluting motor emissions class of the vehicle. vehicles are banned. Vehicles The following table gives an over- frei are banned from the city centre view of the national scheme.

Emission class 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 Sticker No Sticker S-UM 43 S-UM 43 S-UM 43

Requirement for Euro 1 Euro 2 or Euro 1 Euro 3 or Euro 2 Euro 4 or Euro 3 diesel vehicle or worse + particulate ilter + particulate ilter + particulate ilter

Euro 1 with Without a Requirement for catalytic catalytic petrol vehicles converter or converter better

Source: http://www.lowemissionzones.eu/content/view/45/61 license registry. In Berlin the implementation is divided in two 70 towns and cities in eight European coun- stages: tries introduced or are planning to introduce Low Stage 1, effective 1 January 2008: Emission Zones in order to improve air quality in Vehicles (lorries and passenger cars) must at their city centres. least meet the requirements of Pollutant Class 2 The central aim is to improve the air quality and of the recently adopted national vehicle marking to protect the health of the residents. Road traf- scheme. Therefore, only vehicles with red, yellow ic is the main source of noxious substances, like and green stickers are allowed. ine dust (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Emis- Stage 2, effective 1 January 2010: sions of particulate matter increases the danger Only vehicles in Pollutant Class 4 – thus, only of asthmatic and pulmonary diseases, as well as vehicles with green stickers – can drive in cardiovascular distur- the Low Emission Zone. bances and lung cancer. In many city centres the Exemptions are provided for: given upper limits are Police and ire service vehicles, exceeded regularly. transport of severely disabled persons, ambulances, cleaning Adapted from: Manfred vehicles, mopeds, motorbikes Breithaupt (2008): “Envi- ronmental Vehicle Taxation: and some other vehicles. International Experiences”. Presented on the Inter- Penalties: national Workshop on For driving into a Low Emis- Integrated Transport for Sustainable Urban sion Zone without a permit, Development in China there is a €40 fine and a (15–17 December 2008) penalty point on your driving

67 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Traico Limitato” comprising nearly the whole buses which do not meet the Euro 3 emission city centre, an area of approximately 80 hec- standard for driving in the Greater London Area, tares. (Lehmbrock). (approximately 8 square miles). A network of Some cities have implemented larger scale cameras is used for enforcement. he system raises Low Emission Zones. For instance, starting in approximately US$100 million a year, which 2008, London has imposed a daily fee of ₤200 is four times the initial cost of establishing the (US$350) for more highly polluting lorries and camera-based enforcement and charging system.

Box 27: Low emission zone charging in Milan, Italy: EcoPass On 2 January 2008, a one-year trial of EcoPass started. It is a scheme of emissions-based charges for the entry into Milan’s Limited Trafic Zone (ZTL), which is controlled by 43 gates. Cameras record vehicle license plate numbers and pollution class, and debit the card holder’s account. The fee is charged from 7:30–19:30, Monday to Friday. Charges are based on the Euro emissions class of the vehicle, the fuel type, the availability of par- ticulate ilters, and the type of transport (personal or goods). Vehicles using alternative fuel (e.g. LPG, CNG, electric), gasoline cars and lorries (Euro 3 and later), and diesel cars and lorries (Euro 4 and later) are not charged. The maximum toll is €10 (US$12.52) per day. A multiple access card (50 Exemptions are provided for: days of access, not consecutive, with a reduced mopeds, scooters, motorbikes, price) and a subscription card are offered to fre- „„ vehicles carrying disabled persons and/or quent visitors and for residents of the ZTL. „„ bearing a disabled passenger badge. Penalties are enacted if the charge is not paid Travel impacts: by midnight, and/or if a lower pollution class is Since introduction, the results show a signiicant paid contrary to the vehicle’s class, and/or if the reduction of trafic (19.2%) within Milan’s central vehicle is not authorized to enter the zone. core, and an increase in travel speed (11.3%). Fur- The penalty charge is ranging from €70 (US$89) thermore, it can be noticed that the use of public to €275 (US$349). transport has risen by 9.7%.

11.3% 9.7% +

Travel CO Public Vehicle Fleet Trafic 2 Speed Reduction Transport Modiication*

-12% – -19.2%

-40% * reduction of the most pollution vehicles (under Euro 1, 2 and 3 norms)

Adapted from: Manfred Breithaupt (2008), “Environmental Vehicle Taxation: International Experiences”, presented on the International Workshop on Integrated Transport for Sustainable Urban Development in China (15–17 December 2008) For further information: http://www.comune.milano.it/dseserver/ecopass/index.html

68 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 28: „„The restricted zone is a 110-square-kilometre Shanghai bans heavy polluting vehicles area within the Inner Ring road; „„Motorists must apply for stickers (free of charge) Effective 1 October 2006 Shanghai banned heavy certifying their vehicles are environmental- polluting vehicles (below Euro 1 Standard) from friendly; entering the downtown area. Cars, lorries and „„Violators are ined up to 200 Yuan (US$25) buses entering downtown between 7:00 and 20:00 and two points will be added to their driving must comply with the Euro 1 standard under the safety records (motorists with 12 points face new rule. At the time of introduction, 350,000 vehi- licence suspension). cles were not meeting the emissions criteria. Source: China Daily, 30 December 2005

4.2.4 Parking pricing Many developed countries have followed the While parking management strategies will be social service approach to parking, with a prac- discussed more thoroughly in Section 5.2.3, tice of providing ample and free parking in some parking demand management measures cities. Parking is routinely provided for free by are speciically aimed at changing the price of shop owners, employers, and home develop- parking. Of the factors afecting demand for ers, meaning that drivers do not take it into parking, perhaps the most overlooked is the account when making travel choices. An over- price. Most parking is provided to users for free, supply of parking encourages excessive car use although it is not free to build or operate. For and resulting increases in air pollution and further details on parking pricing, please see the traic congestion. module on Parking Management from GTZ A paradigm shift in parking policy is currently which will be published by May 2009 (http:// underway. Planners and city leaders are starting www.sutp.org). to see free parking as a hindrance to improving urban quality of life and housing afordability. “he basic cause of confusion is that Out-dated parking policies are coming under our society has not made up its mind scrutiny as many cities move to improve parking management as a strategy promoting compact, whether a parking space should be transit-oriented smart growth. Cities are moving provided at a market (commercial) from supply-oriented to demand-management oriented policies. he new approach to parking price, or as a ‘social service’.” policy is as follows: G. J. Roth, “Paying for Parking,” 1965

Table 22: Paradigm shift in parking policy

Old paradigm New paradigm Parking considered as Public good Commodity Demand assumed Fixed/Inelastic Flexible/Elastic Supply should Always grow Be managed in response to demand Government regulations Set minimums and no standards None/set maximums Pricing maximizes Utilisation Availability Turnover encouraged via Time limits Pricing Costs should be Bundled with goods Transparent to users

69 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 67 Figure 68 Solar-powered electronic parking Sign informing about parking charges meter for on-street parking. in Singapore. Cars and motorcycles Photo by Karin Rossmark, Brasov (RO), 2004 are charged for parking. Photo by Karl Fjellstrom, Singapore, 2002 he supply of on-street parking spots is relatively ixed once streets have been built. Yet even as demand increases for this ixed supply of spots, Box 29: Parking levies kerb parking is free or cheap in most cities. his leads to ineicient utilization of on-street spaces, City and regional governments can encourage where some vehicles may remain in place all day eficient parking management and generate revenue by charging a special tax or levy on while others circulate in traic, searching for a parking spaces. Such taxes and fees encourage spot. his “search traic” can form a signiicant businesses to reduce their parking supply, and portion of traic on city streets, in some cities as if passed on to users, encourage commuters much as 74% (Shoup, 2005). to use alternative modes of transport. Performance pricing is a policy solution that Parking space fee: A fee on every non resi- ensures on-street parking spots will be available dential parking space. to those who value them the most. With per- Beneits: formance pricing, the per-hour price for on- „„Easy to implement and administer; street spots is based on demand, such that 15% „„Encourages a reduction in parking are always available, (Shoup, 2005). spaces; „„Revenues can be dedicated to public 4.2.5 Vehicle restrictions transport. Policies and regulations which restrict car access Examples: : US$615 per space per year. City do so by limiting parking, closing some streets „„ earns US$31 million per year in revenue; to cars, and prohibiting cars from circulating „„Perth: City earns US$8.2 million per year. in certain areas or at peak hours. Also car-free Resulted in a reduction of 6,000 parking zones are getting increased popularity, as well spaces. as car-free days (once a year or regularily such

70 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

as every Sunday, like this is the case in Bogota, Rio de Janeiro (Avenida Copacabana) and Jakarta, for just naming a few examples). he shared space concept also contributes towards less dependency on motorised travel and puts all modes on equal footing (for details see the GTZ Module 3e: Car-free Development). hese measures are generally not costly, but can be controversial to implement.

4.2.6 Vehicle number plate restrictions Another example of a TDM policy that can be used in certain situations is vehicle license number restrictions. his is a policy where vehicles are restricted from driving in an area on certain days of the week, based on registra- tion plates, with the aim of reducing the overall number of cars in use. International experience includes many cities which have implemented general agreement that vehicle plate restrictions Figure 69 such measures with varying degrees of efec- alone is not an efective measure in the long Car-free zone in Xian. Photo by Armin Wagner, tiveness, (see Box 31). In most cases, the plate term, due to the fact that it does not respond Xian (CN), 2006 restriction applies to certain types of vehicles, to an increase in the amount of vehicles on the certain zones, or certain times of day; although road. So-called “even/odd” schemes have pros in some cities it may apply for the full day. It is a and cons, as shown in Table 23. Table 23: Advantages and disadvantages resulting from number plate restrictions

Advantages Disadvantages Accepted by the public as a demonstration of Cannot provide a long term solution as it will be commitment by government to take action on undermined by growth in vehicle ownership over congestion and air pollution. time. Provide instant, measurable trafic reduction Can be vulnerable to fraudulent practices such as effects. fake number plates. Can provide temporary relief while long-term Increased taxi trips result if taxis are excluded solution is developed, such as public transport from the scheme. improvements or central area congestion pricing. Less dificult to enforce than feared. Can be undermined by exemptions. Households increase the number of vehicles Improve performance of road based public owned as a way to avoid restrictions, but this transport, at least in the short term. effect can be reduced by limiting restrictions to peak period travel.

Excerpted from Pardo, 2008

71 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 30: Restricting car use with plate restrictions In order to be effective, mechanisms to avoid pur- chases of second cars should accompany a plate restriction policy, otherwise number plate restric- tions can encourage used car purchases: 1. Apply restrictions to peak periods only; 2. Ban four numbers each day (instead of two); 3. Change number combinations quarterly or biannually; 4. Require new number plates for used car purchase. Figure 70 Source: Pardo, 2008 Vehicles may be restricted by plate number. Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Bangkok (TH), 2006

Singapore has an of- plate restriction Box 31: scheme which complements its transportation Examples of plate restrictions policies. hese are normal cars with red number schemes in developing cities plates which are allowed to be on the road only Mexico City uses a scheme which prohibits car during the night-time hours and weekends, i.e. use throughout the federal district with number 18:00–7:00 on weekdays, after 15:00 on Sat- plates ending in “1” and “5”on Mondays, “2” urdays and whole day on Sundays and public and “6” on Tuesday etc. for the working week holidays. he scheme ofers drivers the option to (“Hoy No Circula”); save on car registration and road taxes in return Bogotá uses a scheme in which 40% of for reduced usage of the car. In 2005, of-peak private vehicles cannot operate in the city from cars accounted for about 2% of the total car 7:00–9:00 and from 17.30–19.30 in accord- population. ance with designated number plates (“Pico y Placa”); 4.2.6 Employee travel management Santiago de Chile uses a scheme which is here are many steps that businesses can take in effect only on days where atmospheric pol- to encourage more eicient employee travel, lution reaches emergency levels. All vehicles particularly to reduce peak-period automobile except buses, taxis and emergency vehicles commuting, often called Commute Trip Reduc- are prohibited from circulation in morning and evening peaks on the six principal roads con- tion (CTR). Such programs typically include necting the outer areas and city centre; some of the following TDM measures: „„Commuter inancial incentives (parking cash Sao Paulo uses a scheme over a wide central area (within the Inner Ring, 15 km diameter) in out and transit allowances, so employees who which 20% of vehicles (“1” and “2” on Mon- commute by alternative modes receive a ben- days etc.) are prohibited from 7:00–8:00 and eit comparable to subsidized parking). 17:00–20:00 for weekdays; „„Rideshare matching (helping employees Manila uses a scheme which prohibits cer- organize carpools and vanpools). tain vehicles, identiied by number plates, from „„Parking management and parking pricing. operating on the main trafic arteries during „„Alternative scheduling (lextime and com- peak periods. pressed work weeks), which reduces peak- From Cracknell, 2000. period trips and allows employees to accom- modate carpool and transit schedules. „„Telework (allowing employees to work at home, and using telecommunications to sub- stitute for physical travel in other ways). „„TDM marketing which promotes use of alternative modes.

72 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

„„Guaranteed ride home (providing transpor- „„Proximate commuting, which allows employ- tation services for employees who commute ees to shift to worksites that are closest to without a car when they occasionally need to their home (for employers who have multiple travel home). work locations, such as banks and other large „„Walking and cycling encouragement. organisations). „„Walking and cycling improvements. „„Special event transport management, for „„Bicycle parking and changing facilities. example, to provide special employee travel „„Transit encouragement programs. services during special events, peak shopping „„Produce a transportation access guide, which periods, roadway construction projects or concisely describes how to reach a worksite by emergencies. walking, cycling and transit. „„Worksite locations accessible by alternative „„Worksite amenities such as on-site childcare, modes. restaurants and shops, to reduce the need to CTR programs must be able to meet employees’ drive for errands. diverse and changeable needs. Many employees „„Company travel reimbursement policies that can use transportation alternatives part-time, if reimburse bicycle or transit mileage for busi- given suitable support and incentives. For exam- ness trips when these modes are comparable ple, many employees can carpool, telecommute in speed to driving, rather than only reim- or lextime two or three days a week. Some bursing automobile mileage. employees can bicycle commute part of the year. „„Company vehicles, to eliminate the need for employees to drive to work in order to have their cars for business travel.

Box 32: „„ €1.50 a day when arriving during peak hours Rotterdam hospital allows employees to (from Monday to Friday between 6:30 and 13:00) “cash out” their parking spot „„ €4.00 a day when arriving during peak hours The Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam employs (from Monday to Friday between 6:30 and about 10,000 people. A major renovation of the hos- 13:00) and living within 5 to 6 km from the pital in 2004 caused a shortage of parking spaces for hospital, members of staff, visitors and patients. The reduced „„ €0.50 a day when arriving during off-peak the number of parking spots motivated the hospital hours, board to implement a number of measures in reduc- „„ No travelling cost expenses paid to employ- ing car commuting by the personnel. ees travelling alone by car. Before introducing TDM measures, the Medical 2. Individual Travelling Budget where employees Centre conducted a mobility survey amongst person- were credited €0.10 for every km not travelled by nel, visitors and patients. Results showed 80% of the car, and the permission to travel 12 times a year visitors and patients travelled by car to the hospital, by car to work during peak hours, at a value of and that 45% of the employees commuted by car, €1.50 a day. while 60% worked during ofice hours. Of the 700 All measures were communicated to the employees employees living within 5 to 6 km from the hospital, using articles in the internal newsletter, intranet, a a signiicant share commuted by car. lealet explaining the ‘car arrangement’ and the ‘indi- The hospital chose to take measures regarding vidual travelling budget’, and a service point where transport supply and demand for its employees. employees could ask questions. As for supply, a new car park was constructed. For An evaluation in 2006 showed the hospital’s aim to transport demand, employees were offered two reduce car travelling has been reached. The number possibilities: of commuters travelling by car has dropped from 45% 1. ‘Car arrangement’ where employees were allowed in 2003 to 20–25% in 2006. This decrease meant 700 to travel to work by car, but were required to pay parking spots could be used by visitors and patients. for it. Employees were charged: This means suficient parking space was created without the construction of new parking spots.

Source: Elke Bossaert, http://www.eltis.org/studies

73 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

4.3 Supportive measures For a successful implementation of a compre- hensive TDM strategy, enforcement and public awareness are critical supportive eforts. TDM measures are legitimized and gain public accept- ance by enforcement activities and social mar- keting campaigns.

4.3.1 Enforcement New traic laws regulating bicycles and pedes- trians may require education and training eforts with police oicers. Cars which violate regulations beyond the roadway where police eforts tend to be focused are easily overlooked. For instance, a typical violation when new bicy- cle lanes are built is cars using them for parking, blocking bicycle traic. Stricter enforcement of Figure 715 rules requiring cars to stop for pedestrians can help to break the “car is king” culture and create Strict enforcement is a critical complementary a new culture legitimizing NMT. efort for the success of TDM measures. Photo by Manfred Breithaupt, London (UK), 2007 Planning regulations also require enforcement. It is very easy, and often more proitable, for local governments who are in competition for new development within a region to disregard the overall long-term land use strategy in order to gain short-term development revenues. Figure 73 Regional plans are most efectively enforced Car free day in by oversight from a higher government body. Zurich. Children For instance, the planning system in Norway take over the streets requires the state Ministry of Environment to to paint and play. review all local development plans before per- Photo by Lloyd Wright, Zurich (CH), 2005 mits may be issued.

Figure 725 A wheel clamp zone in London protects pedestrian access. Photo by Karin Roßmark/Torsten Derstroff, 2003

74 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

4.3.2 Public awareness TDM measures that incentivize behaviour change — especially Pull measures — ben- eit greatly from eforts to inform the public. A public awareness campaign should be part of every comprehensive TDM strategy. his is especially critical when economic measures such as road pricing are to be implemented, as people are much more receptive when they understand the beneits of the new charge. Push measures such as investments in public trans- port services need to present as part of a TDM strategy package to aid public acceptability. For further information on this topic, please see also Sourcebook Module 1e: Raising Public Aware- ness about Sustainable Urban Transport (http:// www.sutp.org). maps and other information, provide advice on Figure 74 bicycling and transit use, and receive feedback Car free day in Public transit service faces the same challenge as on proposed plans. An example of a public event Zurich. Children any other product on the marketplace, in that which has spread to cities around the world is take over the streets the more people that know about it, the more Car Free Day, where city streets are closed to to paint and play. people will buy it. Marketing new transit service Photo by Lloyd Wright, cars and freed for people walking, bicycling, Zurich (CH), 2005 is a key aspect of growing ridership. Informa- jogging, roller-blading, skateboarding, using tion about routes and fares should be made Segways, and so forth. It tends to be a social easily available to new users through multiple and recreational event, where people interact channels, such as websites, maps, signs, kiosks, and experience the city in a diferent way, enjoy- telephone hotlines, and billboards. ing the quiet and clean air. On 24 February Public events and marketing campaigns can 2000, the city of Bogotá organized the largest help raise public awareness about TDM eforts, scale Car Free Day event, where the entire city but also help to win hearts and minds. Such was closed to private cars from 6:30 to 19:30 on events can help a local government to distribute a regular working day (Box 33).

Box 33: The world’s largest Car Free Day event in Bogotá Most important of all, was the sense of com- The city of Bogotá, Columbia irst established an munity that was present that day. We fortiied our oficial Car Free Day on 24 February 2000, organ- conidence in our capacity of making great collec- ized by Mayor Enrique Peñalosa and The Commons, tive efforts to build a more sustainable and happier an international environmental organisation. This city. Surveys revealed that 87% of the citizens were was one of the irst Car Free days organized in in agreement with the Car Free Day; 89% did not a developing country. The event was successful have any dificulty with the transportation system and highly popular, and as a result the organizers used; 92% said there was no absenteeism at their won the prestigious Stockholm Challenge Award ofice, school or university; and 88% said they (http://www.challenge.stockholm.se). Below is the would like to have another Car Free Day. mayor’s summary: Now we want to bring a referendum to our “It was a formidable achievement of Bogotá’s voters, proposing a goal for the year 2015: Between citizens. A city of seven million inhabitants func- 6:00 and 9:00, and between 14:30 and 19:30, all tioned well without cars. This exercise allowed us cars must be off the streets. Therefore the city to catch a glimpse of what must be the transpor- should move exclusively in public transport and tation system of the city in ten or ifteen years: an bicycles.”

excellent public transport system and rush hours Adapted from Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, without cars. http://www.vtpi.org

75 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 34: “Bike to Work” day in Bavaria provides building blocks for a change in external conditions. Each year the German state of Bavaria sponsors the “Bike to Work” campaign encouraging people The initiative is advertised directly in Bavarian to commute by bicycle. It has grown from 900 par- companies. The client service determines contact ticipating companies in 2002 to 4,400 companies persons — intercompany coordinators — who in 2005. The number of employees bicycling to advertise the campaign and can be contacted work in Bavaria has grown from 10,000 to 50,000 by interested parties. Employees who choose to in that time. participate cycle to work in teams (four individuals, independently of their respective ways to work). The campaign has multiple goals: to shift people Participants cycle to work on a previously deter- out of cars and onto bicycles, to assess bicycle mined number of days over a speciied period facilities, and to improve public health. Lack of of time. Individuals are eligible to win attractive exercise is a major risk factor for ailments asso- prizes. It is a prerequisite that all team members ciated with modern lifestyles such as respiratory fulil this target. illnesses and overweight. Only 30 minutes of exercise a day will increase general itness while The state is able to assess the user friendliness lowering the risk of illness. It is therefore important of bicycle facilities through a participant survey. to integrate exercise in daily life such as by com- Participants are asked answer five questions muting, which is a form of day-to-day exercise concerning the cycling-friendliness of their resi- that does not require any extra time. dential communities. The result helps determine the most cycling-friendly communities which are Another goal lies in inluencing decision-mak- then awarded certiicates. Bavarian municipalities ers towards an attitudinal sea change. The sur- are provided with information on the competition rounding conditions are just as important as indi- in the run-up to give them an opportunity to effect vidual behavioural changes. The willingness of a changes in the short term, if required. The compe- person to integrate more exercise in day-to-day tition thus sensitizes municipalities to the subject life will only increase if the necessary infrastruc- matter and encourages them to take action. ture is established. The campaign therefore also Source: Renate Wiedner, http://www.eltis.org/studies

76 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

development patterns and ensure that new 5. Smart growth and land use growth patterns will not make people depend- policies (“PUSH and PULL”) ent on cars for transportation. Smart growth land use policies improve land use accessibility by increasing development density and mix of “How street space is allocated uses, which reduces the distance required to and managed tells people reach common destinations. Smart growth poli- cies promote transit-oriented development and how to travel. Infrastructure roadway designs that make walking safe and speaks and people follow.” pleasant. In many communities this involves Michael Replogle, Transportation Director retroitting existing automobile-oriented land for Environmental Defense (U.S.A.) use patterns, such as reconiguring streets or intersections to provide more comfort and safety TDM measures in the form of urban planning for walkers and bikers, and developing buildings and design controls are intended to afect future on land currently devoted to parking facilities.

Box 35: Smart growth and transit- Transportation to Land Use and Economic oriented land use policy resources Development, Pennsylvania Dept. of Transporta- tion, PUB 616 (3-07); at (ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/ CCAP (2005), Transportation Emissions Guide- public/PubsForms/Publications/PUB%20616. book: Land Use, Transit & Transportation pdf). Demand Management, Center of Clean Air Policy SGN (2002 and 2004), Getting To Smart Growth: (http://www.ccap.org/guidebook). This Guidebook 100 Policies for Implementation, and Getting to provides information on various smart growth Smart Growth II: 100 More Policies for Imple- and mobility management strategies, including mentation, Smart Growth Network (http://www. rules-of-thumb estimates of VMT and emission smartgrowth.org) and International City/County reductions. Management Association (http://www.icma.org). Todd Litman (2006), Smart Growth Policy USEPA (various years), Smart Growth Policy Reforms, Victoria Transport Policy Institute Database, US Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.vtpi.org); at http://www.vtpi.org/smart_ (http://cfpub.epa.gov/sgpdb/browse.cfm) provides growth_reforms.pdf, and “Smart Growth,” http:// information on dozens of policies that encourage www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm38.htm. more eficient transportation and land use patterns, Anne Vernez Moudon, et al., (2003), Strategies with hundreds of case studies. and Tools to Implement Transportation-Efi- M. Ward, et al., (2007), Integrating Land Use cient Development: A Reference Manual, Wash- and Transport Planning, Report 333, Land Trans- ington State Department of Transportation (http:// port New Zealand (http://www.landtransport.govt. www.wsdot.wa.gov), WA-RD 574.1; at http://www. nz); at http://www.landtransport.govt.nz/research/ wsdot.wa.gov/Research/Reports/500/574.1.htm. reports/333.pdf. PennDOT (2007), The Transportation and Land Use Toolkit: A Planning Guide for Linking

5.1 Integrated land use planning Most land use development controls are in the he models that transportation engineers use to hands of local governments. hey range from project traic growth are problematic in part, zoning codes regulating land use, density, and because they fail to account for diferent pat- parking supply, to design standards for new terns of land use. Traditional transportation construction, such as street width, sidewalks and spatial planning methods tend to give rise and connectivity. to car-oriented new growth, resulting in rising demand for driving. herefore, TDM measures 5.1.1 Regional spatial plans that afect new growth are a critical way to halt Efective growth management in large urban- the trend of rapidly increasing traic growth. ized areas begins from a regional perspective. Modern metropolitan regions may encompass

77 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

several formerly independent cities which have grown together. hey may have rapidly growing or sprawling edge areas which generate a lot of incoming traic. Traic patterns may be highly complex, with growing numbers of trips between suburban centres. For all of these reasons, it is important to look at a metropolitan region as a whole and plan where future growth should be focused, and where new public transport supply can relieve congestion on major roads. Planning policies that manage growth can be national, regional/provincial, and local. hey usually set priorities for compact growth, mean- ing focusing new buildings in existing urban- ized areas rather than on green sites. hey also identify areas of a region which should be pro- tected from growth, for public recreation and Figure 75 second line began construction in 2005 with the High quality NMT Box 36: Decades of regional spatial aim of connecting Vauban to the wider regional infrastructure was and transport planning in Freiburg transport system. integrated into new The Vauban case study highlights the wider growth A particular feature of the new development urban development of Freiburg based on sustainable development has been the very proactive approach to com- in Bilbao. principles following a compact model, which avoids Photo by Andrea Broaddus, munity involvement. A number of working groups Bilbao (ES), 2007 low-density sprawl and car-orientated patterns, have been set up and regular open meetings are seen elsewhere in many parts of Europe. Since the convened with residents. New residents are delib- 1960’s Freiburg has experienced strong growth in erately targeted through marketing campaigns to both population (23%) and employment (30%) and help expand the positive public transport culture. consequently increased private car use. In attempt An important element of this approach is an ongo- to alleviate this growth, the city has been planned to ing effort to educate local people in the beneits exploit the availability of the tram network and new of the ‘high quality’ public transport network to lines have been constructed to serve areas of new correspond with wider policies discouraging car settlement in attempt manipulate modal split. use and promoting sustainable transport modes. One example of these policies in practice is Households can choose to nominate themselves the residential development of Vauban. Vauban as car-free households, which requires them to pay is located on the site of a former French military a one-of fee of €3,500 (and annual administrative base on the southern edge of the city, with a total fee) to the ‘Car-free Living Association’ to purchase area of 42 hectares, accommodating about 5,000 land (which would otherwise be used as parking residents. In 1997, the implementation began spaces) for the creation of community spaces, such (due to be completed later 2006), of a compact as playgrounds, sports facilities or parks. urban residential area with the following strate- In contrast, residents who own cars are required gic aims: to purchase a car parking space from the munici- „„The creation of a district with greatly reduced pality property owner, costing around €17,000 car ownership; (about 10% of the actual housing unit costs). „„Provision of affordable housing; As a result of the Car-Free Living scheme, „„Housing schemes based on innovative low- around half of the households in Vauban have energy solutions. chosen alternative modes for commuting and lei- The public transport connection to Vauban was sure journeys. Local planners hope that towards significantly improved in 2003 with the instal- the end of the decade this scheme will achieve lation of a new tramline. The irst line connects the goal of 75% car free households within the Vauban with the Merzhauser area, running through Vauban district. the city centre and was completed in 2006. The Source: Michael Carreno, http://www.eltis.org/studies

78 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

environmental purposes, which is air and water Some key characteristics of TOD are (from quality protection. hese can take the form of TCRP Report 95): parks, ridge protections, green belts, and lood- „„Higher density commercial and residential plain and waterfront protection. he most efec- development along transit corridors and tive policies not only require planning, but have around stations review processes which enforce those plans. „„A mix of land uses, particularly ground-loor retail shops in oice and residential buildings 5.1.2 Transit oriented development „„Comfortable and attractive pedestrian envi- (TOD) ronment, especially pathways to access transit One of the most efective land use planning „„A mix of housing unit sizes and afordability TDM measures is to increase the density of within walking distance of a transit corridor commercial and residential development along „„A range of employment and services like public transport corridors and stations. he set child care and health care near transit stations of policies which support this practice are called „„Studies have shown that TOD can increase property values in an area. Some public Transit Oriented Development or TOD. he transport authorities have been able to har- concepts of density and clustering which sup- ness the value of the land they own by selling port TOD are discussed in Box 37. or leasing development rights, especially air he main characteristic of TOD is to support rights, (the development rights above rail the transit station as a centre of local com- tracks). When the public transport authority mercial activity, with high-density residential is involved in new development in this way, development within a 20 minute walking dis- it is known as Joint Development. he rents tance. For instance, a TOD may be anchored from development rights provide an income by a train, light rail, or BRT station with a few stream for public transport authorities which multi-story commercial buildings with retail can be used to help inance new transit shops on the ground loor, and be surrounded system expansion. Such projects are known by several blocks of apartment buildings and as Value Capture strategies, where the costs town homes. Single-family homes on their own of transit improvements are paid through lots would be further away, say 1 or 2 kilome- additional income or sales tax revenue from tres. Higher densities are needed to support TOD. Sometimes TOD strategies are used in high frequency transit service and foot traic urban redevelopment eforts, to retroit car- for shops. dominated areas and grow transit ridership.

Box 37: Illustration of density and neighbours, and creates transportation nodes clustering to support Transit Oriented (rideshare stops, bus stops, etc.). Development (TOD) Density refers to the number of people or jobs in a given area. A rural area might have less than Density and clustering are somewhat different 1 resident per acre, for example, while compact concepts. Density refers to the number of people urban areas have 20 or more. More densely popu- or jobs in an area, while clustering refers to the lated areas can support better public transport location and mix of activities in an area. For exam- service. Clustering (also called Compact Develop- ple, simply increasing population densities in ment) refers to land use patterns in which related a residential-only area may do less to improve activities are located close together, usually within accessibility than clustering destinations such as convenient walking distance. schools and shops in the centre of the develop- Compact land use development policy (cluster- ment. Rural and suburban areas have low densi- ing) is more effective at reducing automobile use if ties, but common destinations such as schools, it is complemented by other TDM measures. For shops and other public services can be clustered example, automobile commuting tends to decline in villages and towns. This increases accessibility if employment centres are clustered with shops, by making it easier to run several errands at the restaurants and day-care centres (destinations same time, increases opportunities to interact with that employees want to visit during their breaks).

79 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Clustering can be implemented in urban, suburban C shows eight buildings clustered around a park. or rural conditions, either incrementally or as part As the cluster increases in size the eficiency of of a master-planned development. Clusters can pedestrian improvements, rideshare and public range from just a few small buildings (for example, transport service and other TDM measures also a restaurant, a medical ofice and a single retail increase, due to economies of scale. store) to a large commercial centre with hundreds D shows the eight-ofice building integrated into of businesses. a park or campus, creating more convenient and Density and Clustering can occur at various attractive pedestrian connections between the scales and in many different ways. Ofice build- buildings, further improving access and support- ings, campuses, shopping malls, commercial ing transportation alternatives. districts, towns and cities are examples of clustering. Density and Clustering at a neighbour- hood level (areas of less than a mile in diameter) with good pedestrian conditions creates multi-modal centres (also called urban villages, transit villages or walkable centres), which are suitable for walking and tran- A. Every O ce an Island B. Clustered O ces sit. Clustering is illustrated as follows: A shows a conventional suburban development with buildings surrounded by parking and isolated from each other. There are often no paths connecting the buildings or sidewalks along the streets. Only automobile transportation can effectively serve such destinations.

B shows the same buildings sited C. Two O ces Clustered Around Recreational Open Space so they are clustered together and oriented toward the street, with main entranceways that connect directly to the sidewalk rather than being located behind parking. This type of clustering also facilitates Shared Parking, particularly if the buildings have different types of land uses with different peak demands. For example, if two of the buildings are ofices with peak parking demand during weekdays, another is a restaurant with peak demand during the evenings, and the fourth is a church with peak demands weekend mornings, they can share parking and reduce D. Eight O ce Cluster total parking requirements, which allows even greater clustering. Adapted from Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, http://www.vtpi.org

80 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 76 Dense urban development in Shanghai. Photo by Armin Wagner, Shanghai (CN), 2006

Figure 78 shows the diference between various cities worldwide concerning and transport-related energy consumption.

Figure 775 Every public transport passenger is also a pedestrian, leading to huge sidewalk volumes in Tokyo. Photo by Lloyd Wright, Tokyo (JP), 2005

Figure 784 Urban density and energy eiciency

81 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 38: Public private partnership One of the most important parts of this project TOD in Graz, Austria was the mobility management which ensured that this location is easily accessible by the public In 2007, a new shopping centre, Murpark, was transport system, including the bus. The city of opened in Graz as a best-practice-example of Graz built a park-and-ride-car-deck with approxi- the cooperation of spatial planning, city develop- mately 500 parking places as part of the project. ment and mobility management. Within the 36,000 This is the irst time that a shopping centre in Graz square meters of the shopping centre there are not is directly linked with a public transport system. only shops but also ofices and coffee shops, etc. A private company invested in this Public Private For the successful implementation of this PPP- Partnership (PPP) project together with the city model, the project was linked from the very begin- of Graz, for a total of approximately €75 million. ning with the sustainable mobility programme, This shopping centre is not only directly linked to within which the aspect of the public transport a passing-by motorway, but is also a direct stop system was the most important part. The coop- of the city tram 4 which goes from the inner city eration between the public and the private side of Graz to the shopping centre, and other stops is rather innovative. Customers of the shopping of national bus system. A park-and-ride lot at the centre can park their car for €5 in the parking shopping centre guarantees that people coming to garage for a whole day and can — included with Graz for work can directly go from their car to the the €5 fee — use the entire Graz public transit public transport system. Thus the economic side system. It is also possible to purchase a monthly of the city of Graz is also being supported. ticket for €39. A private company was the driver behind the Murpark is the irst shopping centre to real- creation of this shopping centre. They already ise economic and mobility goals. This is a very had a shopping complex which they wanted to positive counter-example to the “normal” shop- expand, which required a change in the existing ping centres which are planned and realised “on zoning plan of the city of Graz. However, the city the green ield” somewhere outside the city and of Graz — in exchange for the zoning change — which normally lack any connection to the public set the condition that the shopping centre must transport system. develop a sustainable mobility solution. Source: Daniel Kampus, http://www.eltis.org/studies

82 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 39: Thirty years of transit stories) above each subway station. The building oriented development in density declines with distance away from the sta- tions, into medium-density residential (apartments, Arlington County, Virginia duplexes and townhouses), and then into two-story Arlington County, adjacent to Washington DC, is single-family neighbourhoods. The area’s General one of the most successful examples of transit- Land Use Plan was adjusted as needed to allow oriented development in the U.S.A. Nearly 18,000 additional development in the Metrorail corridor residential units and more than 46 million square while preserving older, established residential feet of ofice and retail space have been built in neighbourhoods and historic buildings further Arlington during the last two decades. This type away from it. of development would not be possible without Despite population and employment growth in the Metrorail transit system. Prior to the develop- Arlington County, trafic volumes on local roads ment of Metrorail, the Rosslyn-Ballston corridor has increased little, and the area has far less com- in Arlington County was an aging, low-density muter parking than would normally be required, commercial corridor with declining commercial due to high levels of transit ridership (most transit activity. To help support the area’s economic riders get to the rail station by foot, bicycle or bus), development, County leaders insisted that the frequent local bus service, excellent walking and Metrorail commuter rail line be built underground cycling conditions, and mixed land use that locates rather than at the surface in motorway medians, so many activities close together, minimizing the where adjacent commercial uses would be limited need to drive. As a result, the County has grown by the presence of the motorway. rapidly without major expansion of the motorway network or parking facilities, while maintaining low In order to promote economic development tax rates for residents. The Metrorail corridors above the underground rail stations, the County provide 50% of the County’s tax base on only 7% Figure 79 channelled nearly all new development along the of the land. The area enjoys low vacancy rates Metrorail lines. It promoted high-density devel- Multi-modal road and higher lease and sale prices than otherwise opment adjacent and above rail stations, with design in Amsterdam. comparable locations. Transit ridership has grown Roadway space is relatively high density housing within convenient steadily. Mixed land use has resulted in relatively divided into separate walking distance. Development therefore follows balanced ridership over the day, rather than two right-of-way for a Bulls Eye pattern, with the greatest land use sharp peaks experienced on some systems. tram, car, bicycle, densities around the rail stations. There are high- Source: “Arlington’s TOD Strategy,” Hank Dittmar and Gloria and pedestrian. rise commercial and residential buildings (up to 20 Ohland, 2004 http://www.co.arlington.va.us Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Amsterdam (NL), 2007 5.2 Roadway prioritization and design Roadway right-of-way is one of the most valua- ble assets owned by most city governments, and roadway design can have a signiicant efect on a community’s character and its transportation patterns. Conventional transport planning prac- tices tend to devote most road space to general traic lanes and automobile parking. Since auto- mobiles are relatively space intensive and impose crash risk, noise and air pollution impacts on non-motorised travel, motor vehicle traic tends to “squeeze out” other modes of transport. Real- location of road space involves shifting more road space to speciic transportation activities, and prioritizing within the roadway to favour higher value trips and lower cost modes. Roadway prioritization explicitly allocates resources to favour higher value trips and lower- cost modes priority over lower value, higher cost

83 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

trips in order to improve overall transportation „„Parking management can use regulations and system eiciency and support strategic planning fees to favour higher priority trips, such as objectives. For example: delivery vehicles, customers, taxis and ride- „„Vehicle restraint measures that slow or diverts share vehicles. vehicle traic on a particular road, or even „„Roadway design and management that restrictions on car access at certain locations increases motor vehicle traic volumes and Figure 80 and times. speeds tends to create environments that Bicycles dominate „„Road space reallocation converts general traic are less suitable for pedestrian travel. Traic this street in Beijing, and parking lanes (which favour automobile calming and traic speed reduction programs providing greater travel) to HOV priority lanes (which favour tend to favour non-motorised accessibility comfort and safety bus and rideshare vehicles), bicycle lanes and over motor vehicle mobility. to bicycle users. sidewalk space (which favour non-motorised „„Transit improvements that include bus lanes, Photo by Carlosfelipe Pardo, Beijing (CN), 2006 travel). traic signal prioritization, and other meas- ures to increase bus service speed, comfort and operating eiciency. „„Eicient road and parking pricing often reduces automobile travel and encourages use of alternative modes. Transportation resources are already priori- tized in many circumstances. For example, it is common for emergency vehicles to have prior- ity over general traic, and for delivery vehicles to have the most convenient parking spaces. Tremendous resources have been invested in motorways, which favour longer-distance auto- mobile travel, leading to automobile dependency and sprawl. Roadway prioritization can be used to support mobility management objectives, such as improving the attractiveness of eicient modes, and applying road and parking pricing to reduce congestion. Prioritization is often used to support a road use hierarchy that favours non-motorised modes, high-occupant vehicles, public transport and service vehicles over single occupant private vehicles in policy and planning decisions, called a Green Transportation Hierarchy (TA, 2001). An example of the latter is the city of Bologna, where residents voted to designate its historic centre a “car-restricted zone” (zona a traico limitato). From 7:00 to 20:00, only residents, business owners, taxis, delivery vehicles, and other vehicles with special access needs are per- mitted to enter the area. he system is enforced by an automated vehicle license plate identiica- tion system. As a result, the number of vehicles Figure 81 Pedestrian-only shopping street in Shanghai helps to deine the character of the city. Photo by Karl Fjellstrom, Shanghai (CN), 2002

84 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

entering the core during the restricted period provided for in new construction. Sidewalks declined 62%, although traic is a major prob- should always be included, as well as provision lem during the late evening when automobiles for buses and bike parking on busy arterial roads. are no longer restricted. 5.2.2 Connectivity 5.2.1 Road space reallocation he way that streets are connected together can Road space is a limited and valuable resource have a great efect on transportation demand which should be managed by cities to support management. When traic is funnelled onto strategic goals. In many situations, road space wide, multi-lane roads designed to move cars at currently devoted to automobile traic and high speeds, non-motorised traic is frustrated. parking can be reallocated to more eicient Since the 1960s, the standard for roadway modes, including rail transit lines, bus lanes, system design has been a “hierarchical system” High Occupant Vehicle (HOV) lanes (which which divides streets into categories with difer- include buses, vanpools and carpools, and some- ent design standards. he hierarchical system times freight vehicles and motorcycles), bicycle lanes, sidewalks and green space. his can is designed to keep vehicle traic volumes on be implemented as part of access management residential streets low, for instance by use of (roadway redesign to reduce traic conlicts and cul-de-sacs, and to concentrate vehicle traic on integrate transport and land use planning), traf- a few major arterial roads. However, this con- ic calming (roadway redesign to reduce traic centration of vehicle traic with few alternate speeds and volumes) and streetscaping (roadway routes contributes greatly to traic congestion. redesign to improve overall design and aesthet- A newer design strategy focused on improving ics). Road diets refer to the conversion of higher- street connectivity helps make a road network speed automobile-oriented arterials to more more resilient to congestion by providing more multi-modal and attractive streets that empha- possible routes for vehicles. It also supports a size local circulation and walkability. mix of land uses by making a greater portion It is also the key to review design speciications of destinations accessible than the cul-de-sac for new roads and ensure that all modes are design, which tends to block possible routes

Box 40: Design standards that improve connectivity „„Limit maximum spacing between pedestrian/ Providing convenient connections is key to bicy- bicycle connections to about 350 feet (that cle and pedestrian access. Connectivity can be is, it creates mid-block paths and pedestrian increased during roadway and pathway planning, shortcuts). when subdivisions are designed, by adopting „„Reduce street pavement widths to 24–36 street connectivity standards or goals, by requir- feet. ing alleyways and mid-block pedestrian shortcuts, „„Limit maximum block size to 5–12 acres. by constructing new roads and paths connecting „„Limit or discourages cul-de-sacs (for example, destinations, by using shorter streets and smaller to 20% of streets). blocks, and by applying Trafic Calming rather than Limit the maximum length of cul-de-sacs to trafic restrictions. „„ 200 or 400 feet. Typical street connectivity standards or goals „„Limit or discourages gated communities and include the features listed below. Of course, such other restricted access roads. standards must be lexible to accommodate spe- „„Require multiple access connections between ciic conditions, such as geographic barriers. a development and arterial streets. „„Encourage average intersection spacing for „„Require or create incentive for a minimum local street to be 300–400 feet. connectivity index. „„Limit maximum intersection spacing for local „„Specifically favour pedestrian and cycling streets to about 600 feet. connections. „„Limit maximum intersection spacing for arterial Source: Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, streets to about 1,000 feet. http://www.vtpi.org

85 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

for bicycling and walking. An illustration is provided in Box 40. “Complete Street” design standards consider how roadways function for pedestrians, bicycles and public transport, in addition to private vehicles. measure roadway performance by people through-put, not just vehicle through-put.

Box 41: Illustration of increasing and route options increase, allowing more direct route options for non- travel between destinations, making the system more resilient to congestion. motorised transit The hierarchical road system, illustrated on Connectivity refers to the directness of links and the left, has many dead-end streets and requires the density of connections in path or road net- travel on arterials for most trips. A connected work. A well-connected road or path network road system, illustrated on the right, allows more has many short links, numerous intersections, direct travel between destinations, offers more and minimal dead-ends (cul-de-sacs). As con- route options, and makes non-motorised travel nectivity increases, travel distances decrease more feasible.

Source: “Hierarchical and Connected Road Systems,” by Walter Kulash, et al., 1990

5.2.3 Parking management congestion, accident and pollution reduction Parking management includes a variety of spe- beneits. For further details, please, see the ciic strategies that result in more eicient use module on Parking Management from GTZ, to of parking resources. Many of strategies help be published in May 2009. achieve TDM objectives by encouraging use of Parking management measures are often among alternative modes or supporting more compact the most efective and beneicial TDM meas- land use development. ures. Ineicient parking management increases Table 24 summarizes the parking management development costs, stimulates sprawl, increases strategies described in this report. It indicates motor vehicle traic, and imposes external the typical reduction in the amount of parking costs. Parking facilities consume large amounts required at a destination, and whether a strategy of land. In developing cities, space for parking helps reduce vehicle traic, and so also provides can be very limited, leading to vehicles taking

86 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 24: Parking management strategies

Parking Vehicle Strategy Description Supply Traffic Reduced Reduced

Shared Parking Parking spaces serve multiple users and destinations. 10–30%

Regulations favour higher-value uses such as service Parking Regulations vehicles, deliveries, customers, quick errands, and 10–30% people with special needs. More Accurate and Adjust parking standards to more accurately relect 10–30% Flexible Standards demand in a particular situation.

Parking Maximums Establish maximum parking standards. 10–30%

Remote Parking Provide off-site or urban fringe parking facilities. 10–30%

Encourage more compact, mixed, multi-modal Smart Growth development to allow more parking sharing and use 10–30%  of alternative modes. Increase Capacity of Increase parking supply by using otherwise wasted 5–15% Existing Facilities space, smaller stalls, car stackers and valet parking. Charge motorists directly and eficiently for using Parking Pricing 10–30% parking facilities.  Improve Pricing Use better charging techniques to make pricing more Varies Methods convenient and cost effective.  Provide inancial incentives to shift mode such as Financial Incentives 10–30% parking cash out.  Rent or sell parking facilities separately from building Unbundle Parking 10–30% space.  Change tax policies to support parking management Parking Tax Reform 5–15% objectives.  Improve User Provide convenient and accurate information on Information and parking availability and price, using maps, signs, 5–15%  Marketing brochures and electronic communication. Insure that parking regulation enforcement is eficient, Improve Enforcement Varies considerate and fair. Transportation Establish member-controlled organisations that Management provide transport and parking management services Varies  Associations in a particular area. Overlow Parking Establish plans to manage occasional peak parking Varies Plans demands. Address Spillover Use management, enforcement and pricing to Varies Problems address spillover problems. Parking Facility Improve parking facility design and operations to help Varies Design and Operation solve problems and support parking management.

Source: Todd Litman, 2006, Parking Management: Strategies, Evaluation and Planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (http://www.vtpi.org); at http://www.vtpi.org/park_man.pdf

87 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 824 Growth of demand Estimated ECS for registered private vehicles for space to park 2.5 cars in New Delhi 1 ECS = 23m2 (ECS = Equivalent Car Space, or 23 m2) 2.0 Source: “Chock-a-Block: Parking Measures to Leverage Change,” draft report from the Centre for Science 1.5 and Environment, 2007.

1.0

0.5 Equivalent Car Space (million) Space Car Equivalent

0.0

1991 1996 2001 2006 Year

3Figure 83 Huge parking demand in the CBD of Delhi, in part due to improper parking management schemes. Photo by Abhay Negi, Delhi (IN), 2005

a b

Figures 84a, b, c, d Bogota before and after parking reform. Enrique Penalosa 2001, presentation to the Surabaya City Council

c d

88 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

over public space and crowding out pedestrians, Besides urban form and the quality of public obstructing bicycle lanes, and destroying green space, parking policy has an inluence on many space. Figure 82 shows how rapid growth in other city interests, from traic low to eco- car ownership has led to a growing demand for nomic development. space to park cars in New Delhi. A recent study conducted for the city of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania identiied many urban “Parking spaces attract cars; so they functions of parking other than car storage, as generate car traic. Parking needs described in Box 42. he study found that the space, which is not available for city had an abundance of under-utilized park- other street uses. Nothing else has ing, and that revenues from on-street parking could be easily tripled by closer attention to the changed the traditional streetscape number of parking spots and rates charged by a as dramatically as parked cars have contractor. done during the last few decades.” Table 25 describes a variety of parking manage- Hartmutt H. Topp, Professor at the University ment strategies that are efective TDM measures of Kaiserslautern, Germany in practice worldwide.

Box 42: Managing parking supply in where on-street parking is at a premium, there Dar es Salaam were numerous empty spaces in garages. One garage serving a local mall was using its upper The city of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania is in the levels for storage. process of building a new bus rapid transit system. The study revealed that Dar es Salaam is not Development of the Salaam Rapid Transit (DART) realizing the full revenue potential from parking. will remove about 1,000 of 13,800 on-street and The contract with an operator responsible for garage parking spots in the city centre. A study revenue collection identiied 3,676 spaces in the was conducted in 2007 to assess the impacts of CBD, yet the survey identiied 5,986 spaces in the the loss of this parking capacity, and to assess same area — 63% more. Partly this gap could be whether the spots should be replaced. accounted for by the presence of government The study included a survey of parking occu- and United Nations vehicles, but a signiicant pancy which found that there is no shortage of discrepancy remained. An analysis of revenue parking in central Dar es Salaam. Only 77% of per space showed that the City was receiving legal parking spaces were currently in use on a revenues equating to an occupancy rate of 17%- typical weekday, well within the level considered 28%, signiicantly lower than what the City could optimal for eficiency (85–90%). Thus it concluded reasonably expect to achieve. With occupancy that ample parking would be available following rates measured at about 85%, the study estimated DART construction, however, there were several that Dar es Salaam could expect to at least triple localized “hot spots” where parking is routinely its parking revenues, which are currently about fully occupied and it can be dificult to ind a 50 million shillings per month. spot, particularly in the central business district Adapted from “Bus Rapid Transit for Dar Es Salaam, Parking (CBD). Speciic strategies were recommended Management Final Draft Report,” Nelson\Nygaard Associ- for these areas. ates and the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP), 2006 It was found that off-street parking was underu- tilized in general, and even in parts of the CBD

89 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 25: Parking management measures for TDM

Parking restraint measure Scheme features Locations Implemented Parking pricing Charged on-street parking Many cities world-wide London, other UK cities, Residential parking zones Residents-only parking by permit US cities Management of parking in area to balance Controlled-parking zones UK cities, German cities demand and supply No long-stay parking in city Time restrictions preventing all-day UK cities centre parking Removal of on-street parking during peak Bus lanes/clearways London, many UK cities periods Pedestrian-only zones No trafic at all in street European, Japanese cities Maximum parking Maximum number of parking spots for London, other UK cities, standards new development US cities Commuted (in-lieu) payment Developers pay amount-in-lieu of London, other UK cities, schemes providing parking spots US cities Maximum number of total spaces in city Parking ceiling Portland, Boston centre set Ban parking spaces in new Parking spaces banned in new buildings Zurich buildings in certain parts of city Minimum parking standards can be Ability to reduce minimum reduced if carpool spaces or free public Seattle standards transport passes provided Maximum parking Maximum number of parking spots — standards tied to public lower maximum where higher pubic transit Zurich, Bern transport provision level of service Parking levy on off-street Levy of ixed amount per year on all Sydney CBD & North parking spots business district car parking spots Sydney business district HOV parking priority Spaces reserved for carpools US cities In public parking lots, long-stay spaces Long-stay vs. short-stay charged at higher rate than short-stay US cities charges spaces Parking levy at public Parking tax on all public parking (generally US cities parking lots % added to parking charge) Located on periphery of city centre in Park & Ride lots Oxford, Aachen, Muenster conjunction with dedicated bus service Tax on commercial parking Tax on employer funding of carparks Australia, New Zealand Requires employers to provide employees Cambridge, California, Pakring cash out with the option of receiving the cash Minneapolis, Maryland equivalent of parking subsidy.

Source: Anon 2006, International Approaches to Tackling Transport Congestion: Paper 2 (Final): Parking Restraint Measures, Victorian Competition and Eficiency Commission, April, p. 10.

90 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 43: Parking policy and For example, a strategy used successfully in regulations for TDM Bogotá, Columbia as part of the city’s program to reduce private car use was to increase public Cities should minimise the amount of public space parking fees and to remove limits on the fees that devoted to car parking. For example, avoid con- private parking companies could charge. The verting public squares, streets, sidewalks and additional revenue from the higher city parking unused public land into car parking areas. Instead, fees is dedicated to road maintenance and public create municipal and private off-street paid parking. transport service improvements. On-street parking should only be provided where Parking pricing typically reduces parking roads have suficient space, it should not block demand 10–30% compared with unpriced park- trafic lanes, it should not displace sidewalks, and ing. Pricing of commuter parking is particularly it should be regulated and priced to give priority effective at reducing peak motor vehicle travel. to higher-value users. Charging motorists directly for the parking is more The most convenient parking spaces should economically eficient and fair. generally be managed to favour priority uses, by regulating the type of users (e.g. loading, deliveries, Parking policies available to local visitors), regulating time limits (5-minute loading governments include: zones, 30-minutes adjacent to shop entrances, Parking requirements. Parking standards tend to one or two hour limits for on-street parking in com- be excessive in developing countries with lower mercial areas), or pricing (higher prices and shorter vehicle ownership rates, in urban areas with more payment periods at the most convenient spaces). diverse transportation systems, where parking Priority, short-term parkers can be favoured with is priced. Parking requirements can typically be parking methods that include small increments reduced 10–30% at appropriate sites if standards (a few minutes) and allow users to pay for just more accurately relect parking demand. Dense the amount of time they are parked. Longer mini- developing cities should consider setting maxi- mum time periods (such as parking tickets that mum rather than minimum parking standards in are only sold in units of two hours or more) tend city centres. Parking requirements may be lower to overcharge short-term users. Cities including in locations with good multi-modal access (good Washington, D.C. and Belgrade, Yugoslavia, for walking, cycling and transit), to encourage higher example, apply a scale of parking charges so density and inill development. that the hourly rate becomes progressively more Unbundle parking. Unpriced parking is often “bun- expensive for each additional hour. dled” with building costs, which means that a cer- Parking can be regulated to encourage eficient tain number of spaces are automatically included use of existing capacity: with building purchases or leases. It is more efi- „„Limit on-street parking duration (amount of time cient and fair to sell or rent parking separately, that a vehicle can be left in a spot). so building occupants pay for just the number of „„Limit use of on-street parking to area spaces that they require. residents. Parking maximums. Some urban areas limit the „„Limit on-street parking of large vehicles. maximum amount of parking capacity allowed for „„Prohibit on-street parking on certain routes various types of buildings or within a particular at certain times (such as arterials during rush area. For example, the City of Seattle allows a hour). maximum of one parking space per 1,000 sq. ft. As much as possible, motorists should pay directly of downtown ofice space, and the City of San for using parking spaces, with prices set to make Francisco limits parking to 7% of a downtown the most convenient parking spaces available building’s loor area. for short-term uses and to provide revenues for Allow “in lieu” fees as an alternative to on-site park- transportation programs. For example, on-street ing. In lieu fees means that developers are allowed parking spaces, which tend to be the most con- to pay into a fund for off-site municipal parking venient and so are most suitable for short-term facilities instead of providing their own on-site park- uses such as deliveries and shopping, should have ing. For example, rather than building 20 parking shorter time limits than off-street parking, which spaces at their site, a developer may contribute is more suitable for long-term use by commuters toward the construction of a 50-space parking and residents. facility that is shared among several sites.

91 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Require vehicle owners to have off-street parking. The steps for developing a parking manage- Some cities with limited parking supply require ment plan are: residents to show that they have an off-street 1. Deine general problems to be addressed (park- parking space before they are allowed to register ing congestion, trafic congestion, excessive an automobile, for instance Tokyo, Japan. parking facility costs, poor pedestrian environ- Bicycle parking. Require bicycle parking in new ments, etc.) and the geographic areas to be development, and allow bicycle parking to sub- considered. stitute for minimum automobile parking in zoning 2. Perform parking study that includes: codes. „„ A parking supply inventory (public/private, on/off-street, short/long-term, free/paid, Establish parking information systems. Real time etc.) parking information systems can help drivers avoid „„ A parking utilisation study (what portion cruising for parking. These can be integrated with of each type of parking is used, i.e. peak- advance reservation systems, pay-by-the-minute periods) parking systems, and other telematics supported „„ Projections of how parking supply and initiatives that foster higher productivity of trans- demand are likely to change in the future portation resources. „„ Use this information to identify when and where parking supply is inadequate or Implementation excessive. Parking management is usually implemented by 3. Identify potential solutions. local governments or individual businesses in 4. Work with all related stakeholders to prioritise response to speciic parking and trafic problems. options. Transportation engineers and planners, within 5. Develop an integrated parking plan that identi- public agencies or consultants, are usually respon- ies changes in policies and practices, tasks, sible for developing parking management plans. responsibilities, budgets, schedules, etc.

Adapted from “Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy- makers in Developing Cities, Module 2b: Mobility Management,” by Todd Litman for GTZ, http://www.sutp.org

number of of-street spots based on the esti- mated traic generation of their project. For example, a typical U.S. parking requirement might require construction of 4 spaces per 1,000 ft2 (93 m2), although peak demand only averages 2 to 3 spots per 1,000 ft2 (93 m2). Such Minimum Parking Requirements are intended to minimize the impact of new development on Figure 85 surrounding areas, for instance, so that neigh- Realtime parking bouring streets are not illed with the parked availability in Aachen. cars of new residents or workers. However, it Vehicles searching has been found that such policies tend to stimu- for parking are late automobile ownership and use, and urban removed from traic, sprawl. reducing congestion. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Increasingly, cities around the world are abolish- Copenhagen (DK), 2007 ing such minimum parking requirements and 5.2.3.1 Managing parking requirements replacing them with maximums which cap new for new development parking supply. hus a movement toward Maxi- Often planning regulations are responsible for mum Parking Requirements has been underway generating excessive parking supply and dedicat- since the 1990’s. Large cities such as London ing land that would otherwise be available for which under great traic congestion pressure housing or commercial uses to cars. Most cities are revising their parking policy to limit the regulate parking supply in new development parking supply created with new development. by requiring developers to build a minimum Often this includes a restriction on new parking

92 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table 26: Revised standards of minimum parking requirements

Land Use Typical minimum Revised standard Single family housing 2 per dwelling unit 1 per dwelling unit Multi-family housing 1.5 per dwelling unit 0.5–1 per dwelling unit Hotel 1 per guest room 0.5 per guest room Retail shopping 5 per 100 m2 loor space 2–3 per 100 m2 loor space Ofice building 3 per 100 m2 loor space 1 per 100 m2 loor space Light industrial 2 per 100 m2 loor space 0.5–1 per 100 m2 loor space around transit stations. In some cases, cities developments and not pass the parking problem leave parking decisions to developers, which can to the transport authority. In the city area for result in more market-sensitive decisions. example, 1 car parking lot is speciied for 500 Many cities around the world are revising their square meters of oice space and 1 lot for 400 minimum parking requirements to create fewer square meters of commercial space and so on. new parking spots with new development or reha- If the building development is within 200m bilitation of older urban properties (Table 26). radius of a commuter rail station, the minimum number could be reduced by 20% as an incen- Singapore’s parking management policy speci- tive for use of public transport. If the building ies the minimum parking requirements for development is not able to comply, a deiciency various land uses. his is to ensure that all charge is levied for each lot not provided. he buildings look after their own parking require- transport authority may use the deiciency ment by building of-street car parks in their charges collected in an area to build a central

Box 44: Reform of parking standards „„ Central London: 1 space/300–600 square in London meters Gross Floor Area „„ Inner London: 1 space/600–1,000 square With the rapid growth in car ownership in the UK meters Gross Floor Area during the 1950s, on-street parking became a major „„ Outer London: 1 space/1,000–1,500 square impedance to trafic low. To free up this conges- meters Gross Floor Area tion, new ofice and other commercial buildings There is still a need to eliminate existing stock if were required to build private off-street parking trafic congestion is to be moderated. Of the peak spaces. The new standards required developers 57,000 spaces in the late 1970s, there are perhaps to provide a minimum of 1 space for every 165 sq 50,000 today. It appears unlikely that most private meters of ofice space in inner London. With the owners of PNR space will convert it to other uses rapid construction of new commercial space in without a fairly powerful incentive. central London, tens of thousands of new private However, it can be concluded that parking non-residential (PNR) parking spaces were cre- controls have helped reduce the growth of car ated without any regard to the capacity of the use in congested conditions. The number of cars surrounding road system. has grown by 24% in London over the last twenty As a result, by the mid 1970s the PNR parking years compared with 64% nationally. Whilst public stock had grown to 57,000 spaces in the Central transport passenger kilometres have fallen by 10% Business District and 450,000 outside. These since the mid 1970s nationally, there has been an parking spaces attracted about 40% of arrivals increase of 18% in the use of public transport in during the two hours between 8:00 and 10:00 London. and had a daily turnover of only 1 trip per space. Clearly, there are many factors which have In the 1980s, the Greater London Council (GLC) contributed to these lower motorisation trends proposed higher minimum standards to limit the in London, including the improved performance further growth of PNR parking capacity. of the public transport system during this period. In 1996, the London Planning Advisory Com- However, it appears that parking policy control mittee (LPAC) advised further restraint with maxi- measures have contributed to this. mum provisions: Source: David Bayliss, http://www.civitas-initiative.org

93 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

car park in the vicinity to meet the shortfall in Innovative policies can correct these distortions. car parking lots. Other than that, the authority Parking can be “unbundled” from residential does not build car parks other than providing units, so renters only pay for the number of pay roadside lots along minor roads (on-street parking spaces they actually need. For example, parking) when there is a demand. As for resi- rather than paying US$1,000 per month for dential parking, this is provided by the Housing an apartment or oice that includes two free Authority for public housing and the private parking spaces, the apartment or oice rents developers for private housing. for US$800, plus US$100 per month for each parking space. his lets the building occupant decide how many parking spaces they actually need, and ofers a inancial incentive to reduce parking demand and vehicle use. Since many businesses own large parking facili- ties, they have little incentive to encourage use of alternative modes, since this would result in costly parking spaces being unoccupied. he result is that businesses subsidize parking but ofer no comparable beneit to employees or customers who arrive by other transport modes. his is ineicient and unfair, because it stimu- lates automobile travel and parking demand beyond what consumers would choose if they had more options to choose from, and it subsi- dizes motorists more than people who use alter- native modes. An important parking management strategy is to cash out free parking, so commuters ofered a subsidized parking space can instead choose to Figure 86 5.2.3.2 Unbundle parking receive its cash equivalent. A typical employee would receive US$50 to US$150 in additional Red kerb zone in As a result of generous minimum parking cash or other beneits if they give up their London — no parking requirements, unpriced on-street parking, and parking space and use an alternative com- allowed at any time. weak enforcement of parking restrictions, park- Photo by Andrea Broaddus, mute mode. hese beneits can be prorated, so ing is often free or highly subsidized. Unpriced London (UK), 2007 employees who use alternative modes part-time parking tends to increase vehicle ownership receive a proportional beneit, such as 40% if and use. In general, unpriced parking increases they use alternative commute modes two days vehicle ownership by 5–10%, and vehicle trips a week, and 80% if they use alternative modes by 10–30% compared with what would occur if ive days a week. users pay directly of parking. Parking is often “bundled” (automatically included) with residential units, such that build- ing occupants are forced to pay for a certain number of parking spaces regardless of how many they actually want or need. his prac- tice increases the costs of housing and business activity, and therefore the costs of customers for goods and services. A study of housing sales in San Francisco showed that parking added 9–13% to the selling price of condominiums, regardless of whether the home buyer owned a car (Klipp, 2004).

94 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 45: The Dutch ABC parking policy, „„The places most accessible by public transport as applied in The Hague receive the strictest norms for parking spaces. These are the ‘A’ locations; The Dutch ABC Location Policy is based on two „„The ‘C’ locations are far more dificult to reach key concepts: with public transport and therefore the parking 1. The proximity principle tries to get the origins norms are far less stringent; and destination of trips together as close as „„The ‘B’ locations are situated in between and possible. have both public transport and automobile 2. Accessibility proiles try to get the right busi- access. nesses (also new urban developments) in the The three 3 parking policy standards are: right places in terms of transport needs. A location – Inner city/surroundings of 2 main The main objectives of the trafic and transport stations: 1 place/10 employees; policies of The Hague are: B location – The zone around the inner city: 1 „„Minimising the increase of private car use; place/5 employees; „„Improving accessibility to the city centre; C location – Others: 1 place/ 2 employees. and ABC location parking policy can be introduced „„Improving environmental quality of the city. in larger towns that have an accessibility problem Although the idea is to limit the need to use the and have introduced paid parking. The latter is private car, the role of the private car is not denied. crucial, because the measure implements norms Therefore the plan also aims to regulate the scarce for maximum allowed parking spaces for irms. If space for car parking. The ABC location policy parking in the area is free, location policy can be with regard to parking measures has as a gen- neglected by the irms as parking spaces of the eral objective to improve city centre access and area can be used. As The Hague is a city with a limit car trafic. A key characteristic of the park- relatively high demand for ofice space resulted in ing policy is the recognition that parking demand an increasing zone for paid parking and an acces- of an ofice building is related to the number of sibility problem. The ABC location policy has been employees. If demand is unknown, it is estimated successfully introduced here. The parking norms that each employee will on average occupy about applied to irms/ofices that are related to the PT 25 square meters. The parking demand for visitors provision have the advantage that they will receive is also related to this. easier support from irms (because they have the The parking measure is part of the ABC loca- alternative transport means) and they push irms tion policy. The key features of the parking policy to think about mobility management. are: Source: Tom Rye, http://www.eltis.org/studies

95 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Boxes 46 and 47 present parking management measures proposed for Dar es Salaam and New Delhi.

Box 46: Measures for managing ultimately futile to construct more parking for all- parking supply in Dar es Salaam day commuter use in the CBD; this parking would only add to existing congestion and undermine The quantity of parking provided and the way in the ridership base for DART. Parking on Indira which parking is managed are fundamental deter- Gandhi Street narrows the effective right of way minants of the character of any city. Parking supply and calms trafic. affects urban form, such as the intensity of devel- DART Ridership. One of the most exciting opment and pedestrian friendliness; transportation aspects of DART is that it will appeal to a wide characteristics; and municipal inances. For these cross-section of the City’s population, including reasons, there is a close relationship between more afluent residents who do not ride the dala- parking policies and the success of the planned dalas. However, if parking is free and unlimited, Dar es Salaam Rapid Transit (DART) system. there will be little incentive for people to use DART In Dar es Salaam, there are also more direct instead of their cars. considerations, as the proposed DART routing along Morogoro Road and Kivukoni Front will Pedestrian Safety and Comfort. On some necessitate removal of many on-street parking streets, parking in the CBD provides a useful spaces, plus at least part of the off-street lot adja- buffer between moving vehicles and the walkway, cent to City Hall. Parking policy in Dar es Salaam improving pedestrian comfort and safety. On inluences many aspects of city function: other streets, however, the reverse is true; park- ing on the walkway and in pedestrian crossings Economic Development. While private cars forces pedestrians into the roadway and affects account for a small share of trips — less than 13% — visibility. it is critical to retain good private car access to the CBD, given its economic role and its political Urban Design. Central Dar es Salaam beneits importance to decision makers. This is particularly from a lively, interesting street fabric, with continu- true in advance of full implementation of DART on ous active frontages on most streets in the CBD all major corridors. The impacts of CBD access and Kariakoo. However, there are some examples constraints (i.e. congestion) can already be seen, of recent off-street parking facilities that interrupt in that many new retail and ofice development are these frontages, most notably the large (temporary) choosing to locate on the Bagamoyo Road cor- surface lot across from City Hall. On the other hand, ridor, undermining the pre-eminence of the CBD. parking garages such as the underground PPF Vehicle Speeds. On many streets in the CBD, House facility show how parking can blend into on-street parking is the only effective form of trafic the streetscape. The JM Mall entrance, meanwhile, calming. By narrowing the effective right-of-way to is from the side street (Mission), maintaining the about 2 meters, parking reduces vehicle speeds continuous retail frontage on the key pedestrian substantially. Parking has been well-placed on corridor (Samora). many streets to achieve this goal (see image). Demands for Right-of-Way. Streets in Dar es Public Revenue. On-street parking provides Salaam have many functions: movement (cars, about 50 million shillings in net monthly revenue buses, pedestrians and bicycles); exchange (social to the City Commission — or about US$6 million interaction and street vending); and storage (park- annually. More eficient management could boost ing). On many streets in the CBD, there is insuf- this considerably. icient right-of-way to accommodate all of these functions, and space dedicated to parking is una- Trafic Congestion. Dar es Salaam’s street vailable for movement or exchange functions. network has inite capacity, and parking plan- ning needs to be coordinated with decisions on Adapted from “Bus Rapid Transit for Dar Es Salaam, Parking Management Final Draft Report,” Nelson\Nygaard Associ- roadway capacity. If no new roadway capacity ates and the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy is planned to the CBD, as seems likely, then it is (ITDP), 2006

96 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 47: Parking management Improve user information for proper strategies proposed for New Delhi management of existing spaces Develop public information system to inform A study was conducted in 2007 to assess New „„ people about parking availability, regulations Delhi’s parking policy and develop strategies to and prices. deal with rapidly growing car use at the city’s mar- kets. New Delhi is a densely populated city of 15 „„All civic agencies must develop parking inven- million people, with 4 million registered personal tory for their respective jurisdictions. vehicles. In 2006, the city added 360,000 new „„GIS mapping of parking lots. vehicles, or approximately 1,000 per day. This is „„All civic agencies should review the current nearly double the rate from the year 2000, with con- contracts and guidelines for development of tinued exponential growth expected. With space parking lots, for lower retrieval times, electronic for parking already scarce, and parking facilities metering for variable parking rates, and other at the city’s nine main markets already saturated, physical planning. Delhi is seeking new parking strategies. Promote shared parking for maximum Following are the parking recommendations utilisation of existing spaces of the study: „„As far as possible parking spaces should be Promote efficient utilisation of existing managed as common areas. spaces „„Discourage dedicated individual spaces to maximise the usage of the available facilities. „„Use currently wasted areas (corners, edges, undeveloped land etc), particularly appropriate Assess parking standards for small cars, two-wheelers and bicycles. „„Delhi Development Authority has done upward „„Where there is adequate street width, change revision of the parking norms for the Master from parallel to angled on street parking Plan 2021. It is important to ensure enforce- „„Maximise the number of on-street parking ment and contain spill over. spaces by using a kerb lane during off-peak. „„Consider lexible need based parking stand- „„Use valet parking, particularly during peak ards in the future. time. This can increase parking capacity by „„Develop parking inventory, and assess parking 20 to 40 per cent compared to users parking utilisation pattern to identify areas of deicit, their vehicles. and then identify speciic measures, tasks, „„Identify sites where on-street parking should responsibilities, budgets and schedule. be restricted during peak hours or for all day „„Plan for capping the maximum parking supply parking. that can be allowed. Review the setting of all proposed multi- Need management coordination level parking structures „„Create institutional interface to address park- „„Develop these as remote parking with park and ing pricing, management and parking regula- ride systems and integrate with public transport. tions and enforcement across jurisdictions in They should be located near the interchange a composite manner. points of public transport nodes, or at the periphery of the commercial centres, with free Strengthen enforcement shuttle buses and free transit service. „„Ultimately, the trafic management authority „„These facilities can also be developed as should be able to effectively enforce a restric- overflow parking plan and special event tive parking policy, to collect parking fee, and management. to ine offenders. „„Taxis and three-wheelers can play an impor- Source: “Chock-a-Block: Parking Measures to Leverage tant role in the feeder system for park and Change,” draft report from the Centre for Science and Environment, 2007 ride system.

97 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Yet despite the growing body of efective TDM parking policy measures, parking issues faced by developing cities can present unique local challenges. For instance, the city of Yogyakarta in Indonesia has found it necessary to develop a negotiating strategy to deal with the net- work of informal parking operators that are entrenched in the city’s central business district, as described in Box 48.

Box 48: Negotiating with parking families. The city sought to legalize the activities operators in Yogyakarta of these men and the parking services by relocat- ing them to underutilized off-street garages and The city of Yogyakarta in Indonesia has a crowded lots. Estimating that the parking attendants could and chaotic central business district (CBD). Trans- increase their parking income from 450,000 to portation services are largely unregulated. There 2.5 million rupiahs (US$37.50 to US$208.50) per are about 1600 buses and 800 taxis operating month, city oficials thought they had a good offer. independently, with little regard for passenger However, the parking attendants held a demon- comfort or safety. Conditions for those walking, stration in 2005 refusing the deal. bicycling, and riding in becaks (cycle rickshaws) is Investigating why the parking attendants refused increasingly crowded and slow-going. Those who to move their operations revealed an entrenched can prefer to acquire their own vehicles, leading to system of dependencies and payoffs. The main rapid motorisation. Of Yogyakarta’s 260,000 pri- parties were identiied in the parking network as vate vehicles, 80% are motorcycles, yet the heavily parking attendants and their bosses, land owners, utilized road network is still carrying 15,000 pas- and area leaders. It turned out the city had vastly senger car units per day, with 40,000 smp per day underestimated the proits realised by the illegal in the CBD. Respiratory problems are dramatically parking mob. Parking attendants were able to on the rise, and trafic casualties are the second re-use valid parking tickets and increase their highest after Central Java. Becak operators are proits to 500,000 rupiahs (US$41.70) per month. seeing fewer passengers as people fear being Bosses overseeing 8 parking attendants could mixed in trafic with motorised vehicles. realize a monthly proit of around 1 million rupiahs As fewer pedestrians brave the streets, vendors (US$83.40). The bosses in turn had to pay land are seeing fewer buyers. As a result, the central owners with political power, who could receive area of Malioboro has lost billions of rupiahs worth up to 1 million rupiahs (US$83.40) monthly. And of business. Streets that used to carry 70,000 inally, area leaders hidden within the ranks of the pedestrians per hour are now down to 25,000 per police and military service received payoff from hour, even during holiday peak season. Trafic con- land owners, around 500,000 rupiahs (US$41.70) ditions that force pedestrians into motorised trafic, per property. Collectively, the political and informal along with chaotic parking conditions, especially power of this proit structure proved well suficient in rapidly developing areas, are blamed. to frustrate the aims and efforts of the government A study of the situation revealed that a proit- to reform parking services. able system of informal parking services operating Thus the study concluded that the government in the street were largely responsible for blocking must irst broadly address the issue of organized pedestrians from the sidewalks. About 270 men crime. The parking attendants are seen as the working as parking attendants in the city’s two weakest party which should be protected and central business areas are running parking illegally aided in providing parking services legally. on the street. They earn an estimated 15,000 rupi- Source: “Problems in Reforming Transportation and Parking: A ahs per day, which is a good wage, and support Case Study in Yogyakarta,” Cholis Aunorrohman, 2005

98 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

5.2.4 Trafic cells and diverters Traic cells are a technique of traic manage- ment which reduces speed and convenience for cars. A traic cell is created within a neighbour- hood or city district such that it is diicult or impossible for cars to cut through between arterial roads, and must circle around on one- way streets. he overall efect of a traic cell is to make car use less attractive and convenient within a certain area by making it necessary to Figure 87 travel further and by a less direct route. Traic Contra-low bicycle lane in diverter structures may be built to block streets or Gothenburg. Cars may only intersections to divert traic from direct routes. drive in one direction, while Traic circles can be built which force cars to bicyclists can use both directions. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Gothenburg (DK), 2007 slow down while travelling through intersections. In the early 1960s, the city of Bremen was divided into four sectors, or “traic cells”. Cars are allowed to travel within each cell, but to travel between these cells they must use a cir- cumferential ring road. Pedestrian, bicycle and transit vehicles can travel directly between these cells. As a result, vehicle traic volumes are signiicantly reduced and travel by other modes is signiicantly improved. he city of Gothenburg is Sweden’s second largest city, with almost half a million resi- dents. In the late 1960s, the city’s historic centre was divided into ive traic cells. As in Bremen, cars can travel within each cell but not directly between cells, they must use a ring road. Pedestrian, bicycle and transit vehicles can travel directly between cells. he result 5Figure 88 has been a 48% reduction in vehicle traic Pedestrian zone in despite increased vehicle ownership by residents, Amsterdam. Entry improved pedestrian and cycling conditions is restricted by a (and a 45% reduction in pedestrian accidents), retractable bollard, but and improved transit service. bicycles are allowed. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Bollards are widely used both to separate cars Amsterdam (NL), 2007 from NMT traic, and to restrict car access to certain streets. Often pedestrian zones are bounded by retractable bollards which are lowered at certain times of day to allow delivery vehicle access.

5.2.5 Trafic calming Traic calming refers to various design features Figure 89 and strategies intended to reduce vehicle traic Pedestrian area in speeds and volumes, and improve the comfort Shanghai is deined and safety of non-motorised traic on a par- by bollards. Photo by Armin Wagner, ticular roadway. Some of these strategies are Shanghai (CN), 2006

99 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

described in Table 27. Traic calming projects design, sometimes a practice called Context can range from minor modiications of an Sensitive Design. he most common traic individual street to comprehensive redesign of a calming measures are speed bumps, which are road network. Mainly traic calming measures simply humps of asphalt across the roadway that are implemented on urban streets, especially in cars must drive over slowly. Wider ones made residential areas. Often they are requested by of concrete are known as speed tables. Another neighbourhood residents who are concerned common technique is narrowing the roadway about safety. by building features which protrude into it, for Traic calming involves road planners and instance tree boxes. Some research indicates engineers using lexible standards for road that improved roadway landscaping and tree Table 27: Traffic calming strategies and devices

Type Description Kerb extensions, planters, or centreline trafic islands that narrow trafic Kerb extensions lanes to control trafic and reduce pedestrian crossing distances. Also “pinch points” called “chokers”. Speed tables, raised Ramped surface above roadway, 7–10 cm high, 3–6 m long. crosswalks Mini-circles Small trafic circles at intersections. Raised island in the road centre (median) narrows lanes and provides Median island pedestrian with a safe place to stop. A raised island that forces trafic in a particular direction, such as right- Channelization islands turn-only. The radius of street corners affects trafic turning speeds. A tighter Tighter corner radii radius forces drivers to reduce speed. It is particularly helpful for intersections with numerous pedestrians. Speed humps Curved 7–10 cm high, 3–4 m long hump. Rumble Strips Low bumps across road make noise when driven over. Kerb bulges or planters (usually 3) on alternating sides, forcing Chicanes motorists to slow down. Roundabouts Medium to large circles at intersections (Kittelson, 2000). Special pavement textures (cobbles, bricks, etc.) and markings to Pavement treatments designate special areas. Bike lanes Marking bike lanes narrows trafic lanes. “Road diets” Reducing the number and width of trafic lanes, particularly on arterials. Horizontal shifts Lane centreline that curves or shifts. Kerb bulge or centre island narrows 2-lane road down to 1-lane, forcing 2-lanes narrow to 1-lane trafic for each direction to take turns. Semi-diverters, partial Restrict entry/exit to/from neighbourhood. Limit trafic low at closures intersections. Street closures Closing off streets to through vehicle trafic at intersections or midblock. “Neo-traditional” Streets with narrower lanes, shorter blocks, T-intersections, and other Street design design features to control trafic speed and volumes. Patterns painted into road surfaces and other perceptual design Perceptual Design Features features that encourage drivers to reduce their speeds. Planting trees along a street to create a sense of enclosure and improve Street Trees the pedestrian environment. “Living street”, residential streets with mixed vehicle and pedestrian Woonerf trafic, where motorists are required to drive at very low speeds. Trafic speed reduction programs. Increased enforcement of speeding Speed Reductions violations.

Adapted from: Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, http://www.vtpi.org/tdm

100 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 90 Traic calming in Brussels. A neckdown, speed bump, bollards and zebra crossing combine to reduce car speed and increase pedestrian safety. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Brussels (BE), 2007

planting encourages walking and reduces acci- dent rates. Trees can be particularly beneicial in hot areas where they provide shade. Frequently the sidewalk is extended into intersections, forming a “bulb out”. In some cases, the nar- rowing features change the road from being straight to curvy, which forces cars to slow down. here are dozens of traic calming strate- gies and devices, as shown in Table 27.

Box 49: Traffic calming with „„Limited size. Modern roundabouts usually roundabouts have just one, and never more than two, rotat- ing lanes. A roundabout is an intersection built with a circular In addition, there are mini-roundabouts, which island around which trafic rotates in one direction. are small trafic circles located within local inter- Many older roundabouts (which were also called sections. They still require yield-at-entry but do trafic circles or rotaries) were built primarily as a not have a delector island. location for a fountain or statue, with little regard to trafic principles. As a result, there has been Research has shown that roundabouts can considerable variation in design features and traf- improve reduce vehicle stops and delays, reduce ic regulation, causing confusion and accidents. trafic speeds, and increase safety compared For many years roundabouts were unpopular with with other intersection designs. They are also the public and trafic professionals. used to provide a gateway or aesthetic feature. As a result, roundabouts are once again being During the late Twentieth Century, trafic engi- promoted by trafic engineers and planners, and neering organisations developed roundabout are an important Trafic Calming tool. They are design standards and management practices to increasingly common throughout the world. To maximize trafic eficiency and safety. maximize safety and establish consistency it is These are called “Modern Roundabouts”. They very important that all roundabouts be designed have the following features: (and existing ones redesigned) to relect Modern „„Yield at Entry. Trafic entering the roundabout Roundabout principles. yields the right-of-way to the circulating trafic. Source: Todd Litman, Online TDM Encyclopedia, This prevents trafic from locking-up and allows http://www.vtpi.org free low movement. „„Delection. The entry lane is designed with a small delector island to reinforce the yielding process and slow trafic.

101 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 91 and street furniture which improve the comfort A painted roundabout and ease of bicycling and walking. in Cambridge achieves Design standards for streets should be bicycle the desired efect of and walking friendly. In the U.S., a movement forcing vehicles to slow for “complete streets” got started due to fact that down for minimal cost. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, many residential areas were built without side- Cambridge (UK), 2007 walks, and many commercial areas lack bicycle lanes and parking. Rather than expensive ret- roitting, developing cities should take care to build complete streets — designed to be safe and comfortable for foot and bicycle traic — to begin with. he most important characteristic of NMT planning is the process, that is, how it is done. Best practices usually include the involvement of community members who are bicycling and walking frequently and can help identify problem areas. he basic process is as follows, (adapted from and with further discussion in Sustainable Transport Module 3d): 1. Establishment of a project team and a non- 5.2.6 Planning for NMT motorised transport task force or committee. Planning TDM measures are also aimed at 2. Selection of area to be improved. growing the mode shares for walking, bicycling, 3. Inventory of existing regulations and and public transport by ensuring that new conditions. growth patterns are friendly and encouraging to 4. Development and prioritization of planned these modes. hese measures range from local improvements. street design regulations controlling how new 5. Selection and design of facilities. streets are built, to the provision of information 6. Testing after implementation.

Box 50: Re-designing public space for Measures to redesign public space in the city pedestrians and bicycles in Toulouse centre: „„Facilitate mobility and convenient use of public Toulouse has carried out an integrated package transport; of accompanying actions and mobility changes „„Favour the way and the accessibility of pedes- in the city centre in anticipation of the opening of trians to the subway stations; its second subway line in 2007. The goals are to „„Re-allocate place on the streets in favour of create an access control system for both private pedestrians and cycles;Among other by install- car and freight transport, re-allocate public space ing bicycle parking equipment around all new to pedestrians, and give priority to bicycles and metro stations; public transport on the roads. „„Create speciic lanes for freight delivering. Source: Gerard Chabaud, http://www.civitas-initiative.org

102 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Box 51: Maps and wayfinding may fail to show the locations of transit stations. A Push TDM measure which is inexpensive but Increasingly cities are publishing separate Bicycle frequently overlooked is the provision of informa- Maps which show bicycle facilities and signed tion resources about bicycle and walking routes. routes. These maps are sometimes designed to Most cities publish maps which are oriented toward be water-resistant, to accommodate for bicyclists’ helping drivers ind their way, for instance, they exposure to the weather.

Figure 92a5 A wayinding sign in Bonn. Maps and signs along the bike path make users feel safe. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Bonn (DE), 2000

Figure 92b5 Wayinding kiosk in Brussels. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Brussels (BE), 200

3Figure 92c Maps and wayinding signs in cities are often used by tourists, such as this one in Amsterdam. Photo by Andrea Broaddus, Amsterdam (NL), 2007 Signs which help those walking and driving ind sidewalks and multi-use trails. These signs give their way — wayinding guides — can make the commuters a sense of legitimacy and are espe- pedestrian environment much friendlier. These cially helpful and welcoming to tourists. are usually located at intersections and along

103 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

„„Commuter Check (http://www.commutercheck. References com) works with transit agencies to provide transit vouchers as tax-exempt employee „„ACT (2001): Transportation Demand Man- beneit. agement Tool Kit. Association for Commuter „„Commuter Choice Program (http://www. Transportation (http://www.actweb.org). commuterchoice.com) provides information „„ACT (2004): he Role Of Demand-Side on Commute Trip Reduction programs and Strategies: Mitigating Traic Congestion. beneits, particularly U.S. income tax policies Association for Commuter Transportation, related to commuter beneits. for the Federal Highway Administration „„Concas, Sisinnio/Winters, Philip L. (2007): (http://tmi.cob.fsu.edu/act/FHWA_Cong_Miti- Economics of Travel Demand Management: gation_11%202%2004.pdf). Comparative Cost Efectiveness and Public „„Barter, Rahman Paul/Raad, Tamim (2000): Investment. Center for Urban Transportation Taking Steps: A Community Action Guide to Research (http://www.nctr.usf.edu); at http:// People-Centred, Equitable and Sustainable www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/77704.pdf. Urban Transport. Sustainable Transport „„Cracknell, John A (2000): Experience in Action Network for Asia and the Paciic Urban Traic Management and Demand (http://www.geocities.com/sustrannet). Management in Developing Countries. World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review „„Breithaupt, Manfred (2000): Economic and Background Paper. Fiscal Policy Instruments. Presented at the International Conference on Sustainable „„CUTR (1996): Commute Alternatives Systems Transportation & Clean Air in Jakarta, Handbook. Center for Urban Transportation 20 May 2000. Research (http://www.cutr.usf.edu) for the Florida Department of Transportation, at „„Breithaupt, Manfred (2008): “Environ- http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/3000/3600/3633/cashdoc. mental Vehicle Taxation: International pdf. Manual on encouraging alternative com- Experiences”. Presented on the International mute modes. Workshop on Integrated Transport for Sustainable Urban Development in China, „„CUTR (1998): AVR Employer Trip Reduc- 15–17 December 2008. tion Software,.Center for Urban Transporta- tion Research, (http://www.cutr.eng.usf.edu/ „„CCAP (2005): Transportation Emissions tdm/download.htm). his software predicts Guidebook: Land Use, Transit & Transporta- the change in average vehicle ridership that tion Demand Management. Center of Clean results from various Commute Trip Reduc- Air Policy (http://www.ccap.org/guidebook). tion measures. his Guidebook provides information on „„Dalkmann, Holger (2007): Tackling the various smart growth and mobility manage- Problem: Policy and Planning Instruments ment strategies, including rules-of-thumb to Integrate Climate Change in Sustainable estimates of VMT and emission reductions. Urban Transport Strategies. Presented at 13th „„City of Stockholm (2006): Facts and results United Nations Climate Change Conference from the Stockholm Trials. Congestion in Bali, 7 December 2007. Charge Secretariat. „„Delucchi, Mark A (1998). he Annualized „„Cairns, Sally, et al., (2004): Smarter Choices – Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the United Changing the Way We Travel. UK Depart- States, based on 1990–1991 Data. University ment for Transport (http://www.dft.gov.uk). of California Davis, Institute of Transporta- his comprehensive study provides detailed tion Studies, Report UCD-ITS-RR-96-3. evaluation of the potential travel impacts, the „„DFID: Social Beneits in Transport Plan- costs of various mobility management strate- ning. UK Department for International gies, and case studies. Development (http://www.transport-links.

104 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

org/transport_links/projects/projects_docu- „„ICLEI (1995): Commuting in the Greenhouse: ment_page.asp?projectid=322), includes vari- Automobile Trip Reduction Programs for ous documents discussing methodologies for Municipal Employees. International Council more comprehensive transportation project for Local Environmental Initiatives (http:// evaluation. www.iclei.org). „„DfT (2003): Guidance on the Methodology „„ICLEI: Case Studies, (http://www3.iclei.org/ for Multi Modal Studies (GOMMMS). UK iclei/casestud.htm), Case Reference & Cities Department for Transport, Transport Analy- Database (http://www.iclei.org/iclei/icrsrch. sis Guidance Website (http://www.webtag.org. htm), and European Good Practice Information uk). Service “Local Sustainability” (http://cities21. „„DKS Associates (2003): Modeling TDM com/coldfus/citylist.dbm). Extensive informa- Efectiveness. Washington Department of tion on best practices by local governments and agencies, including many involving Transportation (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ transportation and land use policies. Mobility/TDM/520casev1/execsummary.pdf). „„EEA (2004): Transport Price Signals: Monitor- „„IISD: Sustainable Development Gateway. ing Changes in European Transport Prices and International Institute for Sustainable Charging Policy in the Framework of TERM. Development (http://www.sdgateway.net/ Transport and Environment Reporting Mech- topics/111.htm) contains case studies and other resources developed by members of the anism (TERM), European Environment Sustainable Development Communications Agency; Technical Report No 3/2004 (http:// Network (SDCN). Transportation studies, reports.eea.eu.int/technical_report_2004_3/en/ case studies, assessments, colloquia, etc. 21 Technical_report_3-2004_web.pdf). titles link to the relevant sites. Covering over „„European Program for Mobility Manage- 50 topics, the SD Topics section includes ment Examples (http://www.epommweb.org/ links to more than 1,200 documents: http:// examples/examples.html) describes various www.sdgateway.net/topics/default.htm. European transportation demand manage- „„Klipp, Luke H. (2004): he Real Costs of ment programs. San Francisco’s Of-Street Residential Parking „„Gomez-Ibanez, Jose A. (1992): he Politi- Requirements: An analysis of parking’s impact cal Economy of Highway Tolls and Congestion on housing inance ability and afordabil- Pricing. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 46, ity. Transportation for a Livable City, San no. 31, pp. 343–360. Francisco. „„GTZ (2003): Sustainable Transportation: „„Limanond, hirayoot (2009): Travel Demand A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Develop- Management Policies. Sustainable Urban ing Countries. Sustainable Urban Transport Transport Project (SUTP) (http://www.sutp. Project–Asia (http://www.sutp.org / http:// org/index2php?option=com_content&do_ www.sutp-asia.org) and German Techni- pdf=1&id=136). cal Cooperation (GTZ) (http://www.gtz.de). „„Litman, Todd (2008): Online Transportation Many of these documents are now available Demand Management Encyclopedia. Victoria in various languages including Spanish, Transport Policy Institute, Vancouver. French, Chinese, Indonesian, Romanian, hai and Vietnamese. he Mobility Manage- „„MTE: Moving On the Economy Online ment module is at the VTPI website (http:// Best Practices Database. An ever-expanding searchable inventory of economic success www.vtpi.org/gtz_module.pdf). Preserving http:// and Expanding the Role of Non-motorised stories in sustainable transportation ( w4.metrotor.on.ca/inter/mte/mte.nsf/$defaultvie Transport: Sustainable Transportation is at the w?OpenView&Count=5). Institute for Transportation and Develop- ment Policy website (http://www.itdp.org/STe/ „„MTE: Mobility in the Developing World and STe4/readSTe4/NMT.PDF). Sustainable Transportation Live. Moving the

105 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Economy and the Canadian International (http://www.mobilitymanagement.be). his Development Agency (http://www.movingth- website provides information to help com- eeconomy.ca). A website that provides infor- panies develop a mobility plan in order to mation on how developing cities are applying encourage the use of public transport, collec- sustainable transportation principles to help tive company transport, car-pooling, walking reduce traic congestion, facility costs, pollu- and cycling for home-work journeys. tion and other transport problems. „„Shoup, Donald (2005). he High Cost of Free „„Mueller, P., et al., (1992): Area-wide Concept Parking: Chicago: Planners Press. of Traic Calming in 16 Cities. University of „„TC: Moving On Sustainable Transportation Kaiserslautern, Department of Transporta- (MOST). Transport Canada (http://www. tion, Green Series Number 24. tc.gc.ca/EnvAffairs/most/successful_submis- „„NCS: Climate Protection Manual For Mayors. sions.shtml). Program supports education Natural Capital Solutions (http://www.nat- and awareness-raising projects that promote capsolutions.org/ClimateProtectionManual. sustainable transportation. Also see the Case htm) provides case studies, best practices, Study Library Proiling Twenty-Five Innovative cost/beneit analyses, legislation, technical Approaches To Sustainable Urban Transporta- descriptions and contacts to facilitate local tion In Canada, (http://www.tc.gc.ca/programs/ energy conservation and emission reduction environment/UTSP/casestudylibrary.htm). planning and program implementation. „„TCRP (2007): Traveler Response to Transpor- „„Pardo, Carlos F. (2008): Plate Restriction tation System Changes, Chapter 17, Transit Ori- Measures. Presented at GTZ TDM Training ented Development. Transportation Research Course in Singapore, 17 March 2008. Board, Report 95, Washington, DC. „„PROSPECTS (2003): Transport Strategy: A „„Lietchi, M./Renshaw, N. (2007): A Price Decisionmakers Guidebook. Konsult, Institute Worth Paying, A guide for the new EU rules for Transport Studies, University of Leeds for road tolls for lorries. Transport & Envi- (http://www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk); at http:// ronment (T&E) – European Federation for www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk/public/level1/sec00/ Transport and Environment, Report T&E index.htm. 07/1. „„Regional Environmental Center for Central „„USEPA (2005): Commuter Model. U.S. and Eastern Europe (REC) has 4 urban trans- Environmental Protection Agency (http:// portation success stories, summarized and www.epa.gov/oms/stateresources/policy/ referenced, at http://www.rec.org/REC/Pro- pag_transp.htm). grams/SustainableCities/Transportation.html „„USEPA: Smart Growth Policy Database. US and 2 car use reduction successes, summa- Environmental Protection Agency (http:// rized and referenced, at http://www.rec.org/ cfpub.epa.gov/sgpdb/browse.cfm) provides REC/Programs/SustainableCities/Land.html. information on dozens of policies that „„Replogle, Michael A. (2008): Transportation encourage more eicient transportation and Demand Management: Concepts, Purpose, land use patterns, with hundreds of case Relationship to Sustainable Urban Transport. studies. Presented at GTZ TDM Training Course in „„WBCSD: Sustainable Mobility Project. Singapore, 17 March 2008. World Business Council on Sustainable „„Rural Transport Knowledge Base (http://www. Development (http://www.wbcsdmobility.org/ transport-links.org/rtkb/English/Intro.htm) is a mobility_web/index.asp) includes 200 mobil- set of reference and training material of the ity case studies with brief descriptions and latest thinking and practice in the ield of Internet links. rural transport. „„VTPI (2006): Online TDM Encyclopedia. „„SAVE (2001): Toolbox for Mobility Manage- Victoria Transport Policy Institute (http:// ment in Companies. European Commission www.vtpi.org).

106 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Resources „„European Platform on Mobility Manage- „„Center for Integrated Transport, http://www. ment, http://www.epommweb.org: Network of cit.gov.uk/ruc/index.htm: Road User Charg- European cities using Mobility Management ing research and worldwide case studies. strategies and case studies. „„Clean Air Initiative, Mobile Sources pro- „„German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), gram, http://www.cleanairnet.org/cai: Policy, http://www.sutp.org: Sustainable Urban monitoring, modelling, and other resources Transport Sourcebook and other resources. on air quality in developing cities. „„Institute for Transportation and Develop- „„Environmental Defense, Traic, Health & ment Policy (ITDP), http://www.itdp.org: Climate program, http://www.edf.org/page. Resources and training for environmentally cfm?tagID=1253: Facts and reports on con- sustainable and socially equitable transport. gestion pricing and transportation health impacts. „„International Transport Forum, http://www. internationaltransportforum.org: Resources on „„Environment Program, http://www.unep.org energy eicient transportation. and Sustainable Cities Program, http://www. unhabitat.org: United Nations resources on „„U.S. National TDM Clearinghouse, http:// sustainable development. www.nctr.usf.edu/clearinghouse: Resources for employer-based initiatives and case studies. „„European Local Transport Information Service, http://www.eltis.org: European TDM „„Victoria Transport Policy Institute, http:// initiatives, policies, case studies and tools for vtpi.org/tdm: Transportation Demand practitioners. Management Encyclopedia.

107 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table of Figures Figure 1 High travel demand causes congestion on roads used by all kinds of … 2 Figure 2 Heavy traffic in Delhi 2 Figure 3 Dangerous streetcrossing in Kuala Lumpur due to lack of crossing options 2 Figure 4 Despite significant investments in car-based infrastructure, Bangkok … 4 Figure 5 Cars are increasingly replacing two-wheelers in the modal mix in … 4 Figure 6 A parking space instead of a pedestrian pathat the roadside forces … 4 Figure 7 The impacts of increasing motorisation 5 Figure 8 Multi-modal planning – bus and bicycle lanes next to a wide sidewalk 6 Figure 9 The vicious cycle of increasing car use 9 Figure 10 TDM as an integral part of urban transport planning 10 Figure 11 A bus stuck in heavy Hanoi traffic makes public transport less attractive 10 Figure 12 A highway interchange creates a barrier to non-motorised traffic … 13 Figure 13 Driving forces behind transport trends 15 Figure 14 Paradigm shift from supply side measures to demand management 16 Figure 15 TDM as part of a sustainable transportation system 18 Figure 16 Congested street in Bangkok. Cars, motorbikes and buses are stuck 19 Figure 17 Lane exclusively for buses during peak hours ensures efficient operation 21 Figure 18 Efficient pricing gives consumers more opportunities to save 22 Figure 19 TDM measures with “push” and “pull” effects 23 Figure 20 Three-pronged approach for successful implementation of TDM measures 25 Figure 21 Separated paths for bicycles and pedestrians reduces risk of accidents 26 Figure 22 High quality tram and bus interchange in Kassel makes public transport 26 Figure 23 Sidewalks blocked by parked vehicles reduces walkability on this Ho Chi 27 Figure 24 Children risking their lives in Vientiane by running on the street due 27 Figures 25a, b Demolishing an urban highway in Seoul created urban greenspace 27 Figure 26 Improved infrastructure in Seoul leads to increased quality of life 28 Figure 27 A blocked pedestrian path in Pattaya due to poor design, and lack 28 Figure 28 A wide pedestrian path on the median in Bangkok has trees to separate 28 Figure 29 Pedestrian and vehicle spaces are separated by bollards in Toulouse … 29 Figure 30 A Shared Pedestrian and bicycle path in Chiba 29 Figure 31a A zebra crossing in Bangkok forces pedestrians to climb up to the … 30 Figure 31b This zebra crossing in Bayonne provides a refuge for pedestrians to … 30 Figure 31c A multi-modal crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists in Paris guides … 30 Figure 32a Wide pedestrian crossing with markings for both directions in Singapore 31 Figure 32b Roadway overpass for pedestrians and bicyclists in Nagoya 31 Figure 33 A roadway neckdown, sign, and speed bump ensures that cars slow down … 32 Figure 34a Car free pedestrian zone in Berlin with restricted access times for … 32 Figure 34b Pedestrian zones in shopping districts increase the visual interest and … 32 Figure 35 Pedestrian zones like this one in Chengdu may restrict cars and bicycles 33 Figure 36 A well designed bicycle lane with painting and textured pavement in … 33 Figure 37 Bicycle infrastructure in Hanoi — a roadway exclusively for bikes 34 Figure 38 Bicycle paths for both directions are segregated from the street in … 34 Figure 39 Separated grade two-way bicycle path in Paris 34 Figure 40 On-street bicycle parking in Cambridge offers bicyclists enough space … 36 Figure 41 High bicycle parking demand can be managed with parking installations 36 Figure 42 Bicycle parking at a metro/tram interchange in Munich encourages 37 Figure 43 A shared bicycle system in Sevilla 37 Figure 44 Rent-a-Cycle in Osaka 37 Figure 45 CALL-A-BIKE in Berlin — public bicycle scheme managed by the public 38

108 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Figure 46 Cycle rickshaws like this one in Chiang Mai are an important mode of 38 Figure 47 Cycle rickshaws are popular as a low cost public transport alternative in 39 Figure 48 Modern pedi cab in Berlin 40 Figure 49 Bogotá’s TransMilenio BRT stations provide fast, convenient boarding 42 Figure 50 BRT stations are located on the median. Exclusive lanes ensure short 42 Figure 51 Reliability attracts more passengers. An exclusive bus lane like this one 43 Figure 52 Bus priority lane in London 44 Figure 53 The environmental axis in Bogotá is restricted to use by TransMilenio 45 Figure 54 Bus station in Curitiba 46 Figure 55 A high level platform like this one in Curitiba reduces boarding time 46 Figure 56 BRT station in Changzhou 46 Figure 57 Bus shelter in Nagoya 46 Figure 58 Real-time bus arrival information at a bus stop in Munich 46 Figures 59a, b Bus infrastructure in Beijing allows rapid boarding for convenience 48 Figure 60 Car sharing vehicle in Frankfurt. A variety of different vehicle sizes are 49 Figure 61 Comparison of regional fuel prices 56 Figure 62 Automated toll collection system 58 Figure 63 Congestion charging in Stockholm, with prices varying during the day 59 Figure 64 An overhead gantry controls the congestion charge in Stockholm 60 Figure 65 Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) gantry automatically deducts 61 Figure 66 Short-range radio communication system is used to deduct ERP charges 61 Figure 67 Solar-powered electronic parking meter for on-street parking 70 Figure 68 Sign informing about parking charges in Singapore. Cars and motorcycles 70 Figure 69 Car-free zone in Xian 71 Figure 70 Vehicles may be restricted by plate number 72 Figure 71 Strict enforcement is a critical complementary effort for the success 74 Figure 72 A wheel clamp zone in London protects pedestrian access 74 Figure 73 Car free day in Zurich. Children take over the streets to paint and play 74 Figure 74 Car free day in Zurich. Children take over the streets to paint and play 75 Figure 75 High quality NMT infrastructure was integrated into new urban 78 Figure 76 Dense urban development in Shanghai 81 Figure 77 Every public transport passenger is also a pedestrian, leading to huge 81 Figure 78 Urban density and energy efficiency 81 Figure 79 Multi-modal road design in Amsterdam. Roadway space is divided into 83 Figure 80 Bicycles dominate this street in Beijing, providing greater comfort 84 Figure 81 Pedestrian-only shopping street in Shanghai helps to define the character 84 Figure 82 Growth of demand for space to park cars in New Delhi 88 Figure 83 Huge parking demand in the CBD of Delhi, in part due to improper parking 88 Figures 84a, b, c, d Bogota before and after parking reform 88 Figure 85 Realtime parking availability in Aachen. Vehicles searching for parking 92 Figure 86 Red kerb zone in London — no parking allowed at any time 94 Figure 87 Contra-flow bicycle lane in Gothenburg. Cars may only drive in one 99 Figure 88 Pedestrian zone in Amsterdam. Entry is restricted by a retractable 99 Figure 89 Pedestrian area in Shanghai is defined by bollards 99 Figure 90 Traffic calming in Brussels. A neckdown, speed bump, bollards and zebra 101 Figure 91 A painted roundabout in Cambridge achieves the desired effect of forcing 102 Figure 92a A wayfinding sign in Bonn. Maps and signs along the bike path 103 Figure 92b Wayfinding kiosk in Brussels 103 Figure 92c Maps and wayfinding signs in cities are often used by tourists 103

109 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Table of Tables Table 1: Potential TDM planning benefits 1 Table 2: Factors that justify Mobility Management in developing countries 7 Table 3: Examples of transport system management measures 8 Table 4: Impacts of different types of pricing 11 Table 5: Examples of TDM travel impacts 17 Table 6: Benefits of different types of travel changes 17 Table 7: Types of TDM measures 20 Table 8: Examples of TDM measures 20 Table 9: Pairing push and pull TDM measures 24 Table 10: Facility types used by cyclists 33 Table 11: Advantages and disadvantages to physically separating NMT lanes 35 Table 12: BRT myths and reality 44 Table 13: How well different fees represent marginal vehicle costs 50 Table 14: Economic instruments used as TDM measures 51 Table 15: Economic Instruments in the OECD 52 Table 16: China’s multi-phase vehicle taxation 53 Table 17: German vehicle tax for passenger cars 54 Table 18: COE open bidding results of Singapore’s 2nd quota auction in February 2009 55 Table 19: Winners and losers of road pricing 59 Table 20: Types of congestion pricing systems 61 Table 21: Emission class 67 Table 22: Paradigm shift in parking policy 69 Table 23: Advantages and disadvantages resulting from number plate restrictions 71 Table 24: Parking management strategies 87 Table 25: Parking management measures for TDM 90 Table 26: Revised standards of minimum parking requirements 93 Table 27: Traffic calming strategies and devices 100

110 Transportation Demand Management – Training Document

Tables of Boxes Box 1: Impacts of rapid motorisation in developing countries 3 Box 2: TDM is particularly effective in developing countries 6 Box 3: How sensitive is driving to price? 11 Box 4: The rationale for TDM 12 Box 5: Improving accessibility 21 Box 6: Solving transportation problems with TDM 25 Box 7: Building safe and comfortable streets for pedestrians 31 Box 8: Design of non-motorised transport (NMT) lanes 35 Box 9: Factors in development of bicycle parking 36 Box 10: Examples of shared bicycle services in operation 38 Box 11: Notes on implementing of infrastructure improvements for non-motorised… 39 Box 12: Stages in the development of Singapore’s public transport system 40 Box 13: Measures to improve public transport services 41 Box 14: Bus rapid transit (BRT) 43 Box 15: Use of telematics for bus priority in Aalborg, Denmark 45 Box 16: Public private partnership to improve commuter facilities in Singapore 47 Box 17: Bus lanes and infrastructure improvements in London 47 Box 18: Improving bus and rail transit in Beijing 48 Box 19: Bremen’s “Transit plus Car” card 49 Box 20: Use of revenues from economic measures 50 Box 21: Tax incentive scheme to improve air quality in Hong Kong 53 Box 22: London’s congestion charge 62 Box 23: Stockholm’s congestion charge 63 Box 24: Travel impacts of Stockholm’s congestion charge 64 Box 25: Singapore’s congestion charge 65 Box 26: Low emission zones in Germany 67 Box 27: Low emission zone charging in Milan, Italy: EcoPass 68 Box 28: Shanghai bans heavy polluting vehicles 69 Box 29: Parking levies 70 Box 30: Restricting car use with plate restrictions 72 Box 31: Examples of plate restrictions schemes in developing cities 72 Box 32: Rotterdam hospital allows employees to “cash out” their parking spot 73 Box 33: The world’s largest Car Free Day event in Bogotá 75 Box 34: “Bike to Work” day in Bavaria 76 Box 35: Smart growth and transit-oriented land use policy resources 77 Box 36: Decades of regional spatial and transport planning in Freiburg 78 Box 37: Illustration of density and clustering to support Transit Oriented … 79 Box 38: Public private partnership TOD in Graz, Austria 82 Box 39: Thirty years of transit oriented development in Arlington County, Virginia 83 Box 40: Design standards that improve connectivity 85 Box 41: Illustration of increasing route options for non-motorised transit 86 Box 42: Managing parking supply in Dar es Salaam 89 Box 43: Parking policy and regulations for TDM 91 Box 44: Reform of parking standards in London 93 Box 45: The Dutch ABC parking policy, as applied in The Hague 95 Box 46: Measures for managing parking supply in Dar es Salaam 96 Box 47: Parking management strategies proposed for New Delhi 97 Box 48: Negotiating with parking operators in Yogyakarta 98 Box 49: Traffic calming with roundabouts 101 Box 50: Re-designing public space for pedestrians and bicycles in Toulouse 102 Box 51: Maps and wayfinding 103

111 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH

– German Technical Cooperation –

P. O. Box 5180 65726 ESCHBORN / GERMANY T +49-6196-79-1357 F +49-6196-79-801357 E [email protected] I http://www.gtz.de