DOCSLIB.ORG

Brian.O'[email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brian.O'donnell@Camden.Gov.Uk Brian O’Donnell Strategic Lead – Planning Policy Department: Planning London Borough of Camden Our reference: LDF06/SPDs/SPD01/HA01 5 Pancras Square Date: 28 January 2020 London N1C 4AG By email: [email protected] Brian.O'[email protected] Dear Brian, Statement of general conformity with the London Plan (Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Section 24(4)(a) (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2012 RE: Kentish Town Planning Framework November 2019 (SPD) Thank you for consulting the Mayor of London on the Kentish Town Planning Framework SPD. As you are aware, all Development Plan Documents in London must be in general conformity with the London Plan under section 24 (1)(b) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. While it is noted that the draft document is not a Development Plan Document, it has elements of strategic importance that are considered worthy of the Mayor’s input. The Mayor has afforded me delegated authority to make detailed comments which are set out below. Transport for London (TfL) have provided comments, which I endorse, and which are attached at Annex 1. This letter provides advice, setting out where amendments should be made so that the document is more in line with the emerging draft new London Plan. The draft new London Plan As you already know, the Mayor published his draft new London Plan for consultation on 1st December 2017. The Panel’s report, including recommendations, was issued to the Mayor on 8 October 2019 and the Intend to Publish version of the London Plan was published on the 17 December 2019. Publication of the final version of the new London Plan is anticipated in March 2020, at which point it will form part of Camden’s Development Plan and contain the most up- to-date policies. General The Mayor welcomes Camden’s ambitions to deliver much needed growth in the Kentish Town Framework area and recognises the positive contribution it can make to delivering development across London for industry, jobs and genuinely affordable housing. It is understood that this location has been identified as an area for potential growth over the long term. The site was originally designated in Camden’s Local Plan for employment-led comprehensive redevelopment. It must be recognised that since that time, based on strategic evidence, the Mayor’s strategic approach to the management of London’s industrial land has become more proactive. As it stands, the ambition of the framework to accommodate around 2,000 new homes and over 3,000 jobs would only be considered acceptable where it is able to also demonstrate the area’s ability to take on the Mayor’s priorities for the retention of valuable industrial land in close proximity to the Central Activities Zone (CAZ). The draft SPD early on provides a comprehensive contextual analysis which is welcome. A map illustrating the area’s geographic relationship with the CAZ is included at page 18 which is welcomed. However, the implications and opportunities arising from this should be considered and prioritised where appropriate in line with draft new London Plan Policy SD4. Industrial Capacity Kentish Town Industry Area is the only designated industrial site in Camden. It is comprised of two parts: Regis Road Growth Area to the south and Murphy’s Yard to the north. Camden’s adopted Local Plan establishes the Regis Road Growth Area as an area for mixed use development, resulting in the release of its industrial designation. Murphy’s Yard, on the other hand, still retains its industrial designation as Locally Significant Industrial Land (LSIS). As Murphy’s Yard is the designated LSIS, the Mayor’s preferred approach is one where the remaining industrial part of the site to the north (Murphy’s Yard) is retained and industrial uses intensified to offset any losses of industrial floorspace as a result of the redevelopment of the Regis Road Growth Area or elsewhere in the borough. The approach to be followed is set out clearly in the draft new London Plan Policy E7 and supporting guidance. Camden is identified as a ‘retain capacity’ borough in Table 6.2 of the draft new London Plan. This means that Camden should seek to intensify industrial floorspace capacity following the general principle of no net loss across designated LSIS. Camden is also located within the Central Services Area and should therefore be seeking to prioritise the provision of essential services to the CAZ and in particular sustainable ‘last mile’ distribution/logistics, ‘just-in-time’ servicing (such as food service activities, printing, administrative and support services, office supplies, repair and maintenance), waste management and recycling, and land to support transport functions. This makes it especially important that existing B8 and B2 uses are specifically identified early on and their wider CAZ significance taken into account. The Mayor strongly encourages Camden to recognise the importance of these uses by identifying and protecting or relocating them as part of the emerging Local Plan so that they can continue to serve the important functions of the CAZ. In light of the above, the development objectives listed on page 40 should be amended to include the principle of no net loss of industrial floorspace capacity across both sites with a strong emphasis on the prioritisation of B8 and B2 uses, reflecting the implications of the area’s relationship with the Central Activities Zone. Camden should set out a clear strategy as to how its industrial floorspace will be protected, intensified and increased to meet local and strategic demand, especially within LSIS. It should be noted that the strategic evidence shows the greatest demand is for B8 floorspace, and Camden’s framework should ensure it provides sufficient capacity for this type of provision in line with draft new London Plan policies SD4 and E4 and Paragraph: 031 Reference ID: 2a-031- 20190722 of the revised Planning Practice Guidance. The Mayor expects the framework to follow the guidance set out in his practice note on industrial intensification through plan-led and masterplan approaches. Following on from this, Camden should conduct an industrial land audit in the first instance to establish the exact quantum and nature of existing industrial uses across both the Regis Road Growth Area and Murphy’s Yard. In accordance with the Mayor’s Practice note on industrial intensification and co-location through plan-led and masterplan approaches, phasing should ensure that proposed intensified industrial development is delivered and completed in advance of the residential components; and the approach to decanting and relocating any businesses affected. Housing The Mayor supports the introduction of housing where it is established through evidence that there will be no resulting net loss of industrial capacity and that industrial activity can continue unimpeded (or improved) by the careful introduction of non-industrial uses in accordance with draft new London Plan Policy E7. The framework should recognise that the approach to affordable housing has changed, and the draft new London Plan has introduced the Threshold Approach as set out in Plan Policies H5 and H6. The threshold for the Fast Track Route is set at 35% and this increases to 50% where there is a loss of industrial floorspace capacity across the whole site i.e. both Murphy’s Yard and Regis Road Growth Area combined. It should be noted that the strategic target for the delivery of affordable housing is set at 50% and the framework should be amended accordingly to reflect this. Offices A large part of the southern end of the borough lies within the CAZ and as such Camden should prioritise the development of office space within that area in accordance with Policy E1 of the draft new London Plan. In addition, the office guidelines identify those town centres within the borough where office development is considered appropriate. Beyond the CAZ the office guidelines, as set out in Table A1.1 of the draft new London Plan identifies Kentish Town as having mixed use office potential and Kilburn, Camden Town, Hampstead and Swiss Cottage/Finchley Road as areas where existing office functions should be protected. Therefore, in line with the draft new London Plan Policy E1, Camden should be directing office development towards the CAZ and the town centres identified as part of the office guidelines. The intention to create new office floorspace within industrial areas does not reflect the draft new London Plan which promotes a town centres first approach. As the Regis Road Growth Area lies adjacent to the Kentish Town Town Centre boundary, the SPD should explore how it might extend that boundary so that any proposed offices are focused within an enlarged town centre and policies should ensure a range of town centre uses are provided. Waste The Regis Road Reuse and Recycling Centre is identified in the draft North London Waste Plan in Table 17 and is a safeguarded site. This should be identified and set out clearly in the framework. The framework currently mentions the re-provision of the recycling centre and this should be prioritised in order that the North London Waste Plan can effectively achieve net self sufficiency in accordance with draft new London Plan Policy SI8 and the Mayor’s ambition that 100% of London’s waste should be managed within London by 2026. The loss of the site could potentially mean that Camden is no longer able to meet its waste apportionment figure and that would be unacceptable. The framework should identify suitable reprovision prior to the existing sites release from its waste designation. Transport As referenced within the consultation document, TfL has contributed a Future Transport Context (FTC) Report to the evidence base and officers have appreciated the opportunity to work with Camden Council policy officers on production of this final draft of the planning framework.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ward Profile 2020 West Hampstead Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 West Hampstead Ward The most detailed profile of West Hampstead ward is from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys and from administrative data. Location West Hampstead ward is located to the north-west of Camden. It is bordered to the north by Fortune Green ward; to the east by Frognal and Fitzjohns ward; to the south by Kilburn ward and Swiss Cottage ward; and to the west by the London Borough of Brent. Population The current resident population2 of West Hampstead ward at mid-2019 is 14,100 people, ranking 7th largest ward by population size. The population density is 159 persons per hectare, ranking 7th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of West Hampstead has grown faster than the overall population of Camden (at 17.2% compared with 13.4%), the 3rd fastest growing ward on percentage population change since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 West Hampstead’s population is projected to increase by 1,900 (13.1%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +1,200 and net migration of +600. Births in the wards are forecast to be stable at the current level of 180 a year, while deaths are forecast to increase from the current level of 50, increasing to 60 by 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • Month Ward Used to Injure Not Used to Injure March Bloomsbury 0 3
    Month Ward Used to Injure Not used to injure March Bloomsbury 0 3 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 1 5 Cantelowes 1 0 Fortune Green 1 0 Frognal and Fitz'ohns 0 1 Gospel Oak 0 2 Haverstock 1 1 Highgate 1 0 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 3 Kentish Town 3 1 Kilburn 1 1 King's Cross 0 2 Regent's Park 2 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 0 1 Swiss Cottage 0 1 West Hampstead 0 4 March Total 11 27 April Belsize 0 2 Bloomsbury 1 9 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 0 4 Cantelowes 1 1 Hampstead Town 0 2 Haverstock 2 3 Highgate 0 3 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 1 Kentish Town 1 1 Kilburn 1 0 King's Cross 0 4 Regent's Park 0 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 3 West Hampstead 0 1 April Total 7 36 May Belsize 0 1 Bloomsbury 0 9 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 0 1 Cantelowes 0 7 Frognal and Fitzjohns 0 2 Gospel Oak 1 3 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 1 Kilburn 0 1 King's Cross 1 1 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 4 Swiss Cottage 0 1 West Hampstead 1 0 May Total 4 31 June Belsize 1 2 Bloomsbury 0 1 0 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 4 6 Cantelowes 0 1 Fortune Green 2 0 Gospel Oak 1 3 Haverstock 0 1 Highgate 0 2 Holborn and Covent Garden 1 4 Kentish Town 3 1 MPS FOIA Disclosure Kilburn 2 1 King's Cross 1 1 Regent's Park 2 1 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 3 Swiss Cottage 0 2 West Hampstead 0 1 June Total 18 39 July Bloomsbury 0 6 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 5 1 Cantelowes 1 3 Frognal and Fitz'ohns 0 2 Gospel Oak 2 0 Haverstock 0 1 Highgate 0 4 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 3 Kentish Town 1 0 King's Cross 0 3 Regent's Park 1 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 0 Swiss Cottage 1 2 West
    [Show full text]
  • Reminiscences of Frederick Goodall
    Re min isce n ce s o f Fr e de r ick Go o da ll A R . WI TH T WO POR TRAI TS T H E ALT ER TT L T W S CO P UB I S H ING CO L D . LO N D ON AN D N EWCASTLE- ON - TYN E [All sg/ztsR e se r ve d ] D ED I CAT ED By Gracious Permission Bis maj esty Kin g d ard the S ev enth King of all the Britains and Emperor of India by ’ His Majesty s Loyal and Devoted S ubj e ct T H E A UT H O R P r fa e c e . I N presenting to the reader these recollections , which go back to the earliest years of my life in England , and pass to my travels in France and residence in Egypt , I wish to crave the indulgence of my ’ ‘ ‘ l zfie m ze ur readers . I claim none of the skill of the in the production of these memoirs . I was asked to recall those incidents associated with Cairo , and with other passages in my life which I considered would prove most interesting , and this I have endeavoured A . s to do faithfully , and to the best of my ability to whether I have succeeded in the object with which this volume was written , I must leave it to the public , to whose generous appreciation in another sphere of my life I owe so much , to be the judges . A R . Frederick Goodall, f I must, in conclusion , of er my sincere thanks to all those who have assisted me in every way in their power to carry out my task .
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile 2020 Haverstock Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 Haverstock Ward The most detailed profile of Haverstock ward is still from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys or from administrative data. Location Haverstock ward is located geographically towards the centre of Camden. It is bordered to the south by Camden Town with Primrose Hill ward; to the east by Kentish Town ward; to the north by Gospel Oak ward and to the West by Belsize ward. Population The projected resident population2 of Haverstock ward at mid-2019 is 13,800 people, ranking 9th by population size in Camden. The population density is 188 persons per hectare, the 4th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of Haverstock has grown at a lower rate to the overall population of th Camden (at 11.5% compared with 13.4%), ranking 12 on percentage growth since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Interim Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 Haverstock is forecast to grow by 300 residents (2.3%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +700 and a net loss due to migration of -300. Births in the ward are forecast to fall from the current 160 a year to 130 by 2029, while deaths remain stable at around 80 a year.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Name/Description Address Ward CIL Funding Total Date
    CIL Funding Reference Name/Description Address Ward Date Agreed Total Belsize Terrace, adjacent to/junction with no. 41a LCIL011 Belsize RA Notice Board Belsize £725.15 10/05/2017 Belsize Lane NW3 5AU 1. Belsize Village, Belsize Lane and 2. Belsize LCIL057 Belsize Community Safety (CCTV) Belsize £92,000.00 11/04/2018 Park Gardens/ Englands Lane Belsize and Swiss Cottage Market Area: Swiss Belsize and Swiss Cottage Air LCIL056BE Cottage Farmers Market, Adamson Road, Eton Belsize £2,510.00 25/05/2018 Quality Monitoring Avenue, Winchester Road Wac Arts, The Old Town Hall, 213 Haverstock LCIL120 Inside Out Wac Arts Belsize £25,000.00 08/08/2019 Hill, London NW3 4QP LCIL137 NW3 School Run Belsize £1,035.00 17/10/2019 Belsize Community Library Chairs Belsize Community Library, Antrim Road London LCIL058 Belsize £7,528.80 14/11/2019 and Extractor Fan NW3 4XN Restoration at Belsize Community Belsize Community Library, 8 Antrim Grove, LCIL106 Belsize £12,840.00 12/12/2019 Library Belsize Park, London NW3 4XN CIL Funding Reference Name/Description Address Ward Date Agreed Total LCIL226BL Belsize Streatery Belsize Village, NW3 Belsize £18,636.62 03/07/2020 Belsize Community Library COVID- Belsize Community Library, Antrim Grove, LCIL248 Belsize £23,674.00 05/11/2020 19 Support Belsize Park, London NW3 4XP Gays the Word LCIL105 Gays the Word Video 86 Marchmont Street Bloomsbury £54.51 31/05/2019 Bloomsbury 33 Conway Street 14 Goodge Place 27 Tottenham Street 19-21 Ridgemount Street 3 Huntley Street (new lamp column) LCIL110BL EV Charge Points Bloomsbury Bloomsbury £20,584.00 25/07/2019 Endsleigh street, east side, junction with Tavistock square.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile 2020 Bloomsbury Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 Bloomsbury Ward The most detailed profile of Bloomsbury ward is from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys and from administrative data. Location Bloomsbury ward is located geographically in the south of Camden, part of central London. It is bordered to the south by Holborn and Covent Garden ward; to the north- east by King’s Cross ward; and to the north-west by Regent’s Park ward. It is bordered to the west by the City of Westminster. Population The current resident population2 of Bloomsbury ward at mid-2019 is 12,100 people, the 2nd smallest ward by population size in Camden. The population density is 118 persons per hectare, the 12th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of Bloomsbury has not grown in line with the overall population of Camden (at 11.8% compared with 13.4%), ranking 10th on percentage growth since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 Bloomsbury is forecast to grow by 1,200 residents (9.6%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a negative natural change (fewer births than deaths) over the period of -10 and a net increase due to migration of +1,200. Births in the wards are forecast to maintain the current level of 60 a year through to 2029, while deaths increase slightly from 60 to 70 a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile 2020 Hampstead Town Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 Hampstead Town Ward The most detailed profile of Hampstead Town ward is from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys and from administrative data. Location Hampstead Town ward is located geographically to the north of Camden. It is bordered to the west by Frognal and Fitzjohns ward; to the south by Belsize ward and Gospel Oak ward; to the east by Highgate ward; and to the north by the London Borough of Barnet. Population The current resident population2 of Hampstead Town ward at mid-2019 is 12,100 people, ranking 16th by population size. The population density is 49 persons per hectare, ranking 17th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of Hampstead Town has not grown in line with the overall population of Camden (at 7.5% compared with 13.4%), ranking 17th on percentage growth since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 Hampstead Town is forecast to decrease in overall population by 300 (-2.6%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +100 and a net decrease due to migration of -400. Births in the wards are forecast to reduce from the current 100 a year to 80 a year by 2029, while deaths remain at the current 80 a year to 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Youth Boxing Intervention Activity: Multisports (Incl
    Session information Action Youth Boxing Intervention Activity: Multisports (incl. non, contact boxing, Action Youth Boxing Intervention is a Camden-based hockey, tennis, football), arts & crafts, dance community organisation working with children and young and drama people. Age group: For ages 6-16, including those with Our programmes build confidence, self-esteem, self-worth and SEND physical wellbeing through non-contact boxing and fitness training. Mealtime: Lunch Facilities: Sports/play equipment, space to have lunch Activity time: 10:30AM- 3:15PM Monday-Friday Activity location: Rhyl St, Kentish Town, London NW5 3HB; Actitivities will take place in the Booking information: outside play area of the school. Children will be grouped into small bubble. Email: [email protected] Tel: 07903682301 or Number of places available: 30 per day book via Eventbrite https://bit.ly/312Sn1B Session information African Physical Training Organisation Activity: Football and supplementary education Math and English African Physical Training Organisation (APTO) is registered charity offering various youth activities intended to relieve ill Age group: children & young people aged 5- 16 health and to increase the social, economic and educational status of participants. Mealtime: Lunch 12: 00 pm – 1:00 pm APTO is open to all and specialises in support services for Facilities: Flexible space for indoor sports and central African (Rep of Congo and Congo Brazzaville, classroom activities Cameroon and Ivory coast) communities in Camden, and Activity time: 10.00am – 4pm refugees and asylum seekers. Activity location: At Greenwood Centre, 37 Greenwood Place, NW5 1LB Number of place available: 30 per day Booking information: E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 07405665004 Session information Calthorpe Community Garden Activity: Football camp and a healthy hot meal Calthorpe Community Garden is open for everyone to enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Process
    Camden LB Consultation The Local Government Boundary Commission for England's proposes revised boundaries for Camden wards, including for Camden Town while seeking to maintain electoral variance. This presentation is late in the consultation but important because of relative lack of responses until now from Camden Town and south Kentish Town residents. Introduction Before 2002 there were more wards (26) and councillors (59). The wards boundaries before and after 1999 shown: . 1982-2002 2002-2022 In 1999 the boundaries were revised for all the wards as well as many of the names. One beneficial effect was fewer ward boundaries at Britannia Junction (Camden Town Underground station). Process LGBCE has undertaken the consultation with transparency through the internet. In 2018, the Commission inquired from the Camden Council, which at present predominantly has Labour councillors. The Council broadly supported the existing boundaries, but other political parties proposed revisions. The Commission's first draft recommendation changed almost all of the ward boundaries and increased the number of wards, some with only two councillors. A second draft recommendation in September, however, introduces a new ward for 'Camden Town'. This proposal is unsatisfactory: 1 * It prevents Primrose Hill ward having a boundary at Camden High Street * It separates Hawley Road from Kentish Town * It separates Rochester & Jeffreys from Cantelowes ward * It separates Camden Town Underground from much of Camden Town * It divides the junction at Camden Road Station across five wards – the same problem as previously at Britannia Junction and more than anywhere else now proposed within the Borough. History LB Camden was created in 1965 as the union of Holborn, St Pancras and Hampstead boroughs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile 2020 Swiss Cottage Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 Swiss Cottage Ward The most detailed profile of Swiss Cottage ward is from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys and from administrative data. Location Swiss Cottage ward is located to the mid-west of Camden. It is bordered to the north by West Hampstead ward, Fortune Green ward and Belsize ward; to the east by Camden Town with Primrose Hill ward; to the west/south by Kilburn ward; and to the south by the City of Westminster. Population The current resident population2 of Swiss Cottage ward at mid-2019 is 14,500 people, ranking 5th largest ward by population size. The population density is 115 persons per hectare, ranking 14th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of Swiss Cottage has not grown at the same rate as the overall population of Camden (at 12.3% compared with 13.4%), the 9th fastest growing ward on percentage population change since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 Swiss Cottage’s population is projected to increase by 400 (3.0%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +1,200 and net migration loss of -700. Births in the wards are forecast to decrease from the current 210 a year to 180 by 2029, while deaths are forecast to maintain current levels of 80 a year through to 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 1 524000 526000 528000 530000 532000 534000 188000 188000 186000 186000 184000 184000 182000 182000
    524000 526000 528000 530000 532000 534000 188000 188000 Highgate Hampstead Town 186000 186000 Frognal and Fitzjohns Fortune Green Gospel Oak Kentish Town West Hampstead Belsize Haverstock Cantelowes Swiss Cottage Camden Town with Primrose Hill 184000 184000 Kilburn St. Pancras and Somers Town Regent's Park King's Cross Bloomsbury 182000 182000 Holborn and Covent Garden 524000 526000 528000 530000 532000 534000 Coordinate System: Camden Geological, Hydrogeological Scale at A3: 1:30,000 British National Grid Legend GCS_OSGB_1936 and Hydrological Study London Borough of Camden Railway Lines ¯ Camden Administrative Boundaries Camden Wards A Roads 00.5 1 2 3 Kilometers 213923 FIGURE 1 524000 526000 528000 530000 532000 534000 188000 188000 186000 186000 184000 184000 182000 182000 524000 526000 528000 530000 532000 534000 Data source - BGS Mapping - Scale 1:10,000 Legend Camden Geological, Hydrogeological London Borough of Camden BGS 1:10K Artificial Ground BGS 1:10K Drift Geology BGS 1:10K Solid Geology Scale at A3: 1:30,000 Coordinate System: Railway Lines MADE GROUND ALLUVIUM BAGSHOT FORMATION and Hydrological Study British National Grid A Roads WORKED GROUND HACKNEY GRAVEL FORMATION CLAYGATE MEMBER Camden Geological Map ¯ GCS_OSGB_1936 LANGLEY SILT FORMATION LAMBETH GROUP LYNCH HILL GRAVEL FORMATION LONDON CLAY FORMATION 00.5 1 2 3 STANMORE GRAVEL FORMATION 213923 FIGURE Kilometers NB: Geological boundaries are largely indicative based on available geological mapping data 3 524000 526000 528000 186000 186000 524000 526000 528000 Legend
    [Show full text]