II. the Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

II. the Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand 11. 17he Xubterranean Crustacea of New Zealand: with some general Remarks on the ;Fauna of Caves alzd Wells. By CHARLESCHILTON, M.A., D.Sc., F.X.X., Rector, District High School, Port Chalmers, New Zealand. Read 20th April, 1893. (Plates XV1.-XXIII.) CONTENTS. Page I. Introduotion ................................................................ 163 11. Historical Sketch . , . , . ,. .. 165 111. History, Distribution, and Occurrence of the New Zealand Subterranean Crustacea . 180 IV. Detailed Descriptions of the New Zealand Subterranean Crustacea . 185 Isopoda. The Genus Phreatoicus : P. ccssimilis, sp. nov. ; P. typicus, Chilton ; Comparison of the three known species of Phreutoiczcs ; Special points in the structure of Phreatoicus ; Affinities of Phrecctoicus . 185 The Genus Cruregens: C. fontanus, Chilton . 209 Amphipoda. The Genus Crungonyx : C. compactus, Chilton . 218 The Genus Gcimmams : G. fragilis, Chilton . .. 226 The Genus Cnlliopius : C. subtermneus, Chilton . , . , . , . .. 233 Summary of the more important points in Part IV. , . , . 244 V. The General Fauna of the Subterranean Waters of Canterbury . , . ,. , . 246 VI. The Canterbury Plains and their Underground Waters . :. 248 VII. Origin of the Subterranean Crustacea . 253 VIII. The Special Characteristics of the Subterranean Fauna : Colour ; Loss of Eyes ; Compensation for Loss of Eyesight ; Food ; Arrested Development ; Habits ................................................................ 259 IX. Bearings of the Phenomena of Subterranean Life on the Theory of Descent . 266 X. Conclusion .................................................................. 272 XI. Bibliography . .. 273 XII. Explanation of the Plates . .. .. .. .. 281 I. INTRODUCTION. INthe following paper an attempt is made to give a fuller account than has yet been published of the Blind Crustacea found in the underground waters of the Canterbury Plains in the South Island of New Zealand. The existence of similar Crustacea in the caves and wells and in the deep waters of lakes in Europe and North America has long been known, and has attracted much attention, both because of the inherent interest of the subject, and because of the bearing that the facts have on some general questions of Biology connected with the Theory of Descent, particularly on the effects of yse and disuse, and on the influence of the environment on the animals. SECOND SERIES.-ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 22 164 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN The existence of these animals in New Zealand was first recorded by me [22] about eleven years ago, but the original descriptions, though fairly accurate so far as they go, were very short and meagre, and the figures were rough and crude, and many points were left on which fuller and more complete information was much to be desired. Moreover, during the time that has elapsed since they were first discovered, much additional information has been gathered as to their occurrence and distribution, and no connected account of these has as yet been published. During the same time, too, some important works on the Blind subterranean Crustacea of other parts of the world have appeared, particularly Packard’s work on the Cave Fauna of North America [83], and Wrzeiniowski’s very important memoir on ‘‘ Three Subterranean Amphipoda ” [124]. If we consider the peculiarities of the New-Zealand fauna and flora, and remember that New Zealand forms by itself a distinct zoological province, which has long been more or less perfectly isolated from other provinces, we should naturally expect that the Subterranean. Crustacea of New Zealand would present us with some new interesting facts, and that they would differ largely from the similar Crustacea found elsewhere. This proves to be the case. The Subterranean Crustacean fauna is peculiarly rich, and much more varied than that of either Europe or North America ; so far as at present known, it consists of six distinct species, three Amphipods and three Isopods, helonging to five different genera. Of these genera Crangonyx is already known from the subterranean waters of Europe and North America, but none of the others have been recorded from underground habitats elsewhere, though one, Cammarus, is more or less allied to the blind Niphargzcs of Europe, the species of which were indeed originally assigned to Gammarus, and are still so assigned by some writers. Two genera are new : one, Crzcregem, belongs to a family, the Bnthzcridz, no members of which were prmiously known to inhabit underground waters, and the other, Phreatoiczcs, which now contains three species (two from the subterranean waters of New Zealand, and one freshwater one from the top of the Mt. Kosciusko plateau in Australia), is so peculiar that it forms the type of a new and very remarkable family of the Isopoda. In the following pages I give a full detailed description of the external anatomy of each of these six species, in addition to the brief specific diagnoses and, usually, a discussion on the characters of the genus. I have given what is known of their occurrence and distribution, of their habits, and of the peculiarities which they present in common with or in addition to other Subterranean Crustacea ; their probable origin is discussed at, some length. I have given also a short historical introduction showing the growth of our knowledge on the subject of Cave and Well Sessile-eyed Crustacea; and have concluded with some remarks on the bearing of the facts presented by them on the geueral questions of Biology. For their kindness in providing me with material, I have to record my best thanks to Mr. R. M. Laing, of the Christchurch Boys’ High School, Mr. E. Wilkinson, of the School of Agriculture, Lincoln, Messrs. J. B. Mayne and W. W. Smith of Ashburton, Mr. D. L. Inwood and Miss Young of Winchester. Mr. W. P. Hay of Irvington, Indiana, U.S.A., has kindly supplied me with specimens of some North-American Subterranean Crustacea. Nr. Smith, of Ashburton, has been particularly zealous and CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAPU-D. 165 unwearying in his efforts to obtain specimens for me, and I am much indebted to him for additional knowledge on their distribution and on the general question of the underground waters of the plains. My friend and fellow-worker, Mr. G. M. Thomson, Science Master of the Dunedin High Schools, has assisted me in many wags by his advice and criticism, and by his kindness in supplying me with works from his library that I could not otherwise have obtained. To many writers I am indebted for copies of their various papers, particularly to Professor A. S. Packard and to Dr. R. Moniez, who have sent me copies of important works by them on the subterranean fauna of their respective countries ; while, in common with all other workers on the Amphipoda, I am greatly indebted to the Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing for the very full and valuable Bibliographical Introduction to his Report on the Challenger ’ Amphipoda. Situated as I am at the Antipodes, far from the chief biological libraries of Europe and America, to which one would have liked to have recourse, I can perhaps appreciate the full value of this introduction better than those who are more favourably circumstanced in this respect. 11. HISTORICALSKETCH. The following historical sketch of the growth of our knowledge of the Sessile-eyed Crustacea inhabiting caves and wells is in many respects very imperfect, for I am unable to consult many of the original papers and works quoted ; it contains, however, I trust, references to most of the more important works on the subject. In its compilation I have derived much assistance from Alois Humbert’s paper on Niphargw putea$iw, var. Forelii [62], Professor Packard’s paper on the (‘Cave Fauna of North America ” [83], from Wrzebiowski’s work on “ Three Subterranean Amphipoda ’) [12$], and from the bibliographical introduction Lo Stebbing’s “ Report on the Challenger ’ Amphipoda ” [108]. I have endeavoured to include the Subterranean Isopoda as well as the Amphipoda, but the part’s bearing on them are, I fear, much more incomplete than those on the Amphipoda, as there is no general bibliography on the Isopoda at all comparable to that which Stebbing has compiled with so much care and labour for the Amphipoda. F~NZYON PAULA SCHRANK, in his account of Gammarus pulex [98, p. 5351 says, ((Habitatin aquis, Tivis, fontibus ; albiesimus dum natat.” From the words ‘(in fontibus ; albissirnus durn natat ” Stebbing po8, p. 31) thinks it is fair to infer that Schrank had seen one of the well-shrimps. If this be SO it would appear that we have in this work of Scbrank (1781) the first mention of Subterranean Crustacea. W. E. LEACH[72]. The first undoubted reference to “well-shrimps” appears to have been made by Leach. In the article “ Crustaceology ” in the ‘ Edinburgh hncyclopaedia,’ published probably in 1813-1814, after Gammarus pukx a species is mentioned [72, p. 4031 which is not numbered but <( which Mr. Leach considers to be different from pulex.” It came from a well in London. (( It differs principally from Gammarus pulex in having the upper process of the tail much longer. The co1our, when alive, was cinereous, but so translucent that the eyes could not be distinguished. It stands in Mr. Leach’s cabinet under the specific name subterraneus.” It is evident from this brief description that the animal in question is not a true Gammarus, but is a subterranean species, probably a Niphargus. Stebbing j108, p. 841 thinks it is probably identical with Niphargus aquilex, Schiodte, 0 22” 166 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN and it is assigned to this species also by Spence Bate and Westwood [4, p. 3161. Wrzehiowski [124, p. 6021 thinks that the description given is scarcely sufficient to enable us to decide whether the animal belongs to Niphargus aquilex, Schiiidte, or Crangonyx compactus, Spence Bate ; but in the latter species the terminal uropoda are not very long, and, as Leach specially mentions that they are long in his specimen, it appears more likely that it is a Niphargus.
Recommended publications
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 05:23:45PM Via Free Access 24 R
    Contributions to Zoology, 70 (1) 23-39 (2001) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Hierarchical analysis of mtDNA variation and the use of mtDNA for isopod (Crustacea: Peracarida: Isopoda) systematics R. Wetzer Invertebrate Zoology, Crustacea, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA, [email protected] Keywords: 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, COI, mitochondrial DNA, isopod, Crustacea, molecular Abstract Transition/transversion bias 30 Discussion 32 Nucleotide composition 32 Carefully collected molecular data and rigorous analyses are Transition/transversionbias 34 revolutionizing today’s phylogenetic studies. Althoughmolecular Sequence divergences 34 data have been used to estimate various invertebrate phylogenies Rate variation across 34 lor lineages more than a decade,this is the first ofdifferent study survey Conclusions 35 of regions mitochondrial DNA in isopod crustaceans assessing Acknowledgements 36 sequence divergence and hence the usefulness ofthese regions References 36 to infer phylogeny at different hierarchical levels. 1 evaluate three loci fromthe mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs genome (two (12S, 16S) and oneprotein-coding (COI)) for their appropriateness in inferring isopod phylogeny at the suborder level and below. Introduction The patterns are similar for all three loci with the most speciose suborders ofisopods also having the most divergent mitochondrial The crustacean order Isopoda is important and nucleotide sequences. Recommendations for designing an or- because it has a broad dis- der- or interesting geographic suborder-level molecular study in previously unstudied groups of Crustacea tribution and is diverse. There would include: (1) collecting a minimum morphologically are of two-four species or genera thoughtto be most divergent, (2) more than 10,000 described marine, freshwater, sampling the across of interest as equally as possible in group and terrestrial species, ranging in length from 0.5 terms of taxonomic representation and the distributionofspecies, mm to 440 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 10-2: Arthropods: Crustacea
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Arthropods: Crustacea – Ostracoda and Amphipoda. Chapt. 10-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 10-2-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 10-2 ARTHROPODS: CRUSTACEA – OSTRACODA AND AMPHPODA TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASS OSTRACODA ..................................................................................................................................... 10-2-2 Adaptations ................................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Swimming to Crawling ....................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Habitats ...................................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Terrestrial ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Peat Bogs ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-4 Aquatic ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 6.1MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 59(2): 457–529 (2002) NEW PHREATOICIDEA (CRUSTACEA: ISOPODA) FROM GRAMPIANS NATIONAL PARK, WITH REVISIONS OF SYNAMPHISOPUS AND PHREATOICOPSIS GEORGE D.F. WILSON AND STEPHEN J. KEABLE Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract Wilson, G.D.F. and Keable S.J. 2002. New Phreatoicidea (Crustacea: Isopoda) from Grampians National Park, with revisions of Synamphisopus and Phreatoicopsis. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 59(2): 457–529. The Grampians National Park, Victoria, has substantial environmental significance owing to the diversity of endemic species restricted to this reserve. We reinforce this observation by reporting six new species and two new genera of isopod crustaceans endemic to the Grampians, and redescribe two previously known Victorian species representing formerly monotypic genera. These isopods are members of the ancient suborder Phreatoicidea, and show diverse morphologies. To demonstrate the basis for the classification of these species, we present a phylogenetic analysis of exemplar species of most extant genera of Phreatoicidea. Our analysis supports the sister group relationship of Phreatoicopsis and Synamphisopus. We observe a rudimentary accessory flagellum on the antennulae of both genera, but this isopod plesiomorphy optimises on the cladograms as a reversal. Two new genera, Naiopegia gen. nov. and Gariwerdeus gen. nov., are members of the Phreatoicidae, but are distinct from any described taxa in this family. Various metazoan and protist epibionts are commonly encoun- tered on these isopods. These species are described using detailed scanning electron microscopy and inked drawings: family Amphisopodidae, Phreatoicopsis raffae sp. nov., Phreatoicopsis terricola Spencer and Hall, 1897, Synamphisopus doegi sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to and Revisions of the Amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Fauna of South Africa, with a List of Currently Known Species from the Region
    Additions to and revisions of the amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) fauna of South Africa, with a list of currently known species from the region Rebecca Milne Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa & Charles L. Griffiths* Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (with 13 figures) Received 25 June 2013. Accepted 23 August 2013 Three species of marine Amphipoda, Peramphithoe africana, Varohios serratus and Ceradocus isimangaliso, are described as new to science and an additional 13 species are recorded from South Africa for the first time. Twelve of these new records originate from collecting expeditions to Sodwana Bay in northern KwaZulu-Natal, while one is an introduced species newly recorded from Simon’s Town Harbour. In addition, we collate all additions and revisions to the regional amphipod fauna that have taken place since the last major monographs of each group and produce a comprehensive, updated faunal list for the region. A total of 483 amphipod species are currently recognized from continental South Africa and its Exclusive Economic Zone . Of these, 35 are restricted to freshwater habitats, seven are terrestrial forms, and the remainder either marine or estuarine. The fauna includes 117 members of the suborder Corophiidea, 260 of the suborder Gammaridea, 105 of the suborder Hyperiidea and a single described representative of the suborder Ingolfiellidea.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Endemism Among Freshwater Isopods (Crustacea^ Phreatoicidea)
    Ancient endemism among freshwater isopods (Crustacea^ Phreatoicidea) George D. F. Wilson1 and Richard T. Johnson1 Centre for Evolutionary Research, The Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2000 Ancient clades with restricted geographic distributions have been found in the isopod crustacean suborder Phreatoicidea. These isopods colonized fresh water in Gondwana by the Triassic Era and today are restricted to permanent groundwaters. A phylogenetic analysis of 21 exemplar species showed that major cladogenic events took place prior to the fragmentation of Gondwana. Nichollsia, a genus restricted to India, was deeply nested within a Western Australian and Victorian clade. The Phreatoicidae branched off early in all cladograms, with Australian and New Zealand sister clades. Some clades may be closely associated with Gondwanan landmasses that were subdivided by shallow Cretaceous seas. INTRODUCTION distinct genetic forms known from the South Australian artesian springs of the Lake Eyre The Phreatoicidea are the earliest derived supergroup (M. Adams, Environmental Report, isopod Crustacea (Brusca and Wilson 1991), Kinhill Engineers Pty Ltd); Hypsimetopus sp. appearing in the marine fossil record during from near Zeehan, Tasmania, possibly the Carboniferous (~325 mybp: Hessler conspecific with H. intrusor Sayce 1902 but 1969; Schram 1970, 1974). Phreatoicideans variation has not been fully evaluated; cf. invaded fresh waters of the Gondwanan Hyperoedesipus sp. from the Pilbara region supercontinent by the Triassic (Protamphisopus of Western Australia, a new genus with wianamattensis (Chilton 1918), see Nicholls presumed affinities to H. plumosus Nicholls 1943) and subsequently became extinct in the and Milner 1923. The Tasmanian genera oceans. Today, phreatoicideans are restricted are poorly defined but are labelled in Figure to permanent fresh waters and occur in 1 to indicate the possible phreatoicidean Australia as well as on a few other continental diversity of this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea of the Environs of St. John, New Brunswick, Canada
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 74 Annual Issue Article 38 1967 Crustacea of the Environs of St. John, New Brunswick, Canada Richard W. Coleman Upper Iowa College Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1967 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Coleman, Richard W. (1967) "Crustacea of the Environs of St. John, New Brunswick, Canada," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 74(1), 240-246. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol74/iss1/38 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coleman: Crustacea of the Environs of St. John, New Brunswick, Canada Crustacea of the Environs of St. John, New Brunswick,. Canada RICHARD w. COLEMAN 1 Abstract. The following species of crustacea were col­ lected in a survey of the environs of St. John, New Bruns­ wick, Canada: Crangonyx gracilis Smith, Gammarus duebeni Lilly, Gammarus lawrencianus Bousfield, Gammarus ocean­ icus Segerstrale, Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, Hyale nilssoni Rathke, Hyalella azteca Sauss., ]aera albifrons Leach, Mar­ inogammarus finmarchicus Dahl, Marinogammarus obtusatus Dahl and Marinogammarus stoerensis Reid: Hyalella azteca was the predominant species in purely fresh water lakes; Gammarus Ugrinus predominated in fresh to brackish waters; and Hyale nilssoni appeared to be the dominant species from marine sources. This discussion is based upon a paper entitled "A Report to the Provincial Department of Public Health, Province of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, on a Survey for Certain Crustacea of the Environs of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for Packard's Cave Amphipod
    Conservation Assessment for Packard’s Cave Amphipod (Crangonyx packardi) (Zhang, 1997) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region October 2002 Julian J. Lewis, Ph.D. J. Lewis & Associates, Biological Consulting 217 W. Carter Avenue Clarksville, IN 47129 [email protected] This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Crangonyx packardi. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject community and associated taxa, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Packard’s Cave Amphipod (Crangonyx packardi) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 4 NOMENCLATURE AN DTAXONOMY .................................................. 4 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES .................................................................... 4 LIFE HISTORY............................................................................................ 5 HABITAT ...................................................................................................... 5 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Phreatoicoidea Family Phreatoicidae
    PAl'. & PHOC. ROY. Soc. TASMANIA, 194-:i (15TH DECEMBER, Hl4·L) 1 The Phreatoicoidea By G. E. NICHOLLS Professor of Biology, Un·i?Jersity of Western Australia (Read 16th November, 1948) PART II.-The PHREATOICIDAE Family Phreatoicidae Right mandible without lacinic~ mob1:lis. Body sub-cylindrical, pi eon compressed; head relatively long, generally with posterior process; cervical groove usually well developed; first peraeon segment normally not fused to the head; the tel son as a rule produced into terminal projection. Maxillula usually with few setospines on apex of proximal endite; coxae of peraeopods generally free from pleura of related segments; bases of hinder peraeopods moderately, or scarcely, expanded. As has already been noted (Part I, p. 25), the essential distinction between the Amphisopidae and the Phreatoicidae is found in the retention or the loss of the secondary cutting edge of the right mandible. Since a similar reduction in that appendage has also taken place independently in some Amphipoda as well as in several groups of the Isopocla, that moclification might be attributable to difference in dietary or mode of life, but such an explana­ tion will not avail for the Phreatoicidae, all of which seem to be humus feeders. ·within the sub-order, the degradation or complete disappearance of this lacinia could, of course, have occurred independently in more genera than one and, thus, forms which lack the right lncinin nwb-ais need not necessarily be near akin, but, on the other hand, its occurrence must have a phyletic significance, since its n~tention can only be interpreted as an inheritance from a common ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Crangonyx Pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958 – the First Alien Amphipod Crustacean in Freshwaters of Iberian Peninsula (Portugal) M
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2012) 404, 11 © ONEMA, 2012 http://www.kmae-journal.org DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2012005 Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958 – the first alien amphipod crustacean in freshwaters of Iberian Peninsula (Portugal) M. Grabowski(1)*, M. Rachalewski(1,2), F. Banha(2), P. Anastacio(2) Received January 12, 2012 Revised February 28, 2012 Accepted March 6, 2012 ABSTRACT Key-words: Crangonyx pseudogracilis, a North American crangonyctid amphipod, was alien species, found in a stream of Santarém District (Portugal) in September 2011. It is aquatic the first record of this species from the Iberian Peninsula. Exact time, mode invasions, of introduction and distribution of C. pseudogracilis in the area remain inland waters, unknown. So far its occurrence was reported only from several countries Mediterranean in north-western Europe. A short overview upon the species general dis- region, tribution, ecology and invasive potential is provided. Crangonyctidae, first record RÉSUMÉ Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958 – le premier crustacé amphipode non-natif dans les eaux douces de la péninsule ibérique (Portugal) Mots-clés : Crangonyx pseudogracilis, un amphipode crangonyctid d'Amérique du Nord, a été espèces trouvé dans un ruisseau du district de Santarém (Portugal) en Septembre 2011. Il exotiques, est le premier enregistrement de cette espèce dans la péninsule ibérique. La date invasions et le mode d'introduction et la répartition de C. pseudogracilis dans la région res- d'espèces tent inconnus. Jusqu'ici, sa présence n'a été signalée que dans plusieurs pays du aquatiques, nord-ouest de l'Europe. Un bref aperçu sur la distribution de l'espèce, l'écologie région et son potentiel invasif est fourni.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Phenomena of Subterranean Life Author: Chilton, Charles Qualification: MD Year: 1899
    Title: Phenomena of subterranean life Author: Chilton, Charles Qualification: MD Year: 1899 Scanned as part of the PhD Thesis Digitisation project http://libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk/phddigitisation PREFACE. This paper which has "been written at somewhat short notice for a special object is rather an outline of work intended to be some day accomplished than a record of work already completed. In it an endeavour has been made to indicate the main pro¬ blems that arise in connection with the subject chosen and as far as possible to give a statement of what has been already made clear by other researches Some of the chapters have been written with some degree of fulness, others are only sketched in outline. The Crustacea have been treated through¬ out more fully as they have been more specially studied by the writer,and in the appendix a first contribution is made towards a better knowledge of the British Subterranean Amphipoda. (The numbers given in brackets refer to the list of References given at the end of the paper.) CONTENTS. I. INTRODUCTORY . PAGE 1. * II. CAVES AND UNDERGROUND WATERS " 8. III. HISTORICAL SKETCH " 29. IV. THE MEMBERS OP THE SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA. » 34. V. SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OP THE SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA " ^ VI. ORIGIN OP THE SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA. " ^ T VII. COMPARISON OP THE SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA WITH THE DEEP SEA FAUNA AND WITH THAT OF THE DEEP WATERS OF LAKES " 72' VIII. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS " 7^- IX. APPENDIX ON THE EXTERNAL ANATOMY NIPHARGUS AQ.UILEX, SCHIODTE.. " 7*7 X. LIST OF REFERENCES " J. INTRODUCTORY, The student of Natural History is constantly meeting with facts and phenomena that excite his wonder and admiration but perhaps there is nothing more striking than the manner in which living beings have pushed their way into every corner of the globe, and the variety of the means by which they have so adapted themselves to their surround¬ ings that the continued existence of the species is secured even under what appear to be the most adverse circumstances.
    [Show full text]