DOCSLIB.ORG

Perf Police English FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perf Police English FINAL ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE International Experiences Isabelle Lelandais Analyst and Project Officer In collaboration with Julie Bodson Analyst October 2007 Original version of paper written in French 1 MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE International Experience Isabelle Lelandais Analyst and Project Officer In collaboration with Julie Bodson Analyst, ICPC October 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Centre for the Prevention of Crime (ICPC) would like to thank the Association des directeurs de police. du Québec (ADPQ) (Quebec Association of Police Directors) for recommending the need for this international review. At the 9 th Annual ADPQ Conference, Serges Bruneau, Project Director at ICPC, unveiled the first draft of this report on measuring police performance practices. ICPC would also like to thank everyone who took the time to respond to our requests for information in the various countries addressed in this document. Finally, we would like to thank Benoît Dupont, Criminologist at the International Centre for Comparative Criminology, University of Montreal for his insightful comments and contribution to this document. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE CURRENT CONTEXT - MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE ......................................................................... 2 1. NEW YORK AND THE COMPSTAT SYSTEM ........................... 7 2. CHICAGO AND CHICAGO'S ALTERNATIVE POLICING STRATEGY (CAPS)............................................................ 11 3. THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT IN QUEBEC ............... 15 4. TABLE OF INDICATORS IN CHILE...................................... 24 5. THE BEST VALUE METHOD AND THE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK IN ENGLAND AND WALES ..... 27 6. THE STRATEGIC SEMINAR AND DISCUSSION TABLE IN BELGIUM.......................................................................... 34 7. THE ORGANIC LAW FOR FINANCE LAWS IN FRANCE......... 40 8. FEDERAL PROCEDURE AND ADAPTATION OF THE COMPSTAT METHOD IN AUSTRALIA ................................. 48 9. THE ADAPTATION OF THE COMPSTAT METHOD IN NEW ZEALAND.......................................................................... 57 CONCLUSION.......................................................................... 63 GLOSSARY .............................................................................. 68 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES ............................................... 70 1 MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE Preliminary comment: This document relates solely to the police as a public institution exercising a public safety role. It does not relate to private police forces, companies that enter into agreements with the police, or even private services provided by the police in exchange for remuneration from private companies. Introduction: The Context: Measuring Police Performance Measuring the performance of the public sector is increasingly important in a number of countries and, as a result, has become a recurrent preoccupation in police circles. In recent years, a more financial approach to public management has emerged. This approach has two dimensions: a political dimension that consists of ensuring that the benefits provided by services and regulations are proportional to their cost; and an organisational dimension where selection of the specific types of the interventions is based on the organisation and effectiveness of public services. Police services, as well as other agents in the justice system and governments, are searching for a police model that is financially affordable, accountable, sustainable, and compliant with ethical standards. Also, the application of business management principles to government services is the context in which police performance is measured, and is linked to the emergence of new types of police responsibilities and interventions. The introduction of business management principles into government services has resulted in new legislation that relates to all or some of these services, such as New Zealand’s State Sector Act of 1988, the 2001 Organic Law for Finance Laws (LOLF) * in France, or to the the police in particular, such as the United Kingdom’s Local Government Act of 1999. 2 In Australia, the introduction of these principles is exemplified by the creation of a national mechanism to evaluate the quality of local and federal government services, introduced in the six states and two territories in 2003 by the Prime Minister and heads of government. Using objectives and indicators*, the services offered by each state have been evaluated and compared according to the type of activity. At the same time, new types of police intervention have emerged to meet current expectations of the police which require them to be more responsive to the community and prevent crime in a proactive manner. This relates to two models in particular: problem-oriented policing * and community policing *. The advent of information communication technologies (ICTs) and computers in particular has also resulted in significant changes to police crime recording practices. 1 The Compsta*t method, which at times draws on knowledge-based policing* TP PT , is a good illustration of this. Nowadays, police services are expected to be able to justify, demonstrate and assess not only their activities, but also the impact of these activities on crime reduction and on attaining “high performance” (New Zealand) or even “police excellence“ (Belgium), Different methods, procedures and indicators have been used to achieve these objectives in the countries and police services under review. This review of international experience on measuring police performance focuses on methods used in nine cities, provinces and countries. Some police services evaluate the effectiveness* of their activities on a local level (i.e. in each district). In this case, their analysis compares the results achieved with the initial objectives of the programme. The concerns and demands of the community and the particular crime-related problems in their geographical area are taken into account when determining specific objectives. The effectiveness of the police service is measured by the link between action taken and results obtained (eg. number of arrests, clearance rates, an increase in perception of safety among citizens). Operational performance is also mentioned, since the aim is to satisfy residents by responding to local neighbourhood priorities 1 Definitions for terms followed by an asterisk are provided in the glossary. 3 In some countries there is an increased focus on the performance of the institution as a whole, by evaluating the efficiency* of the organisation. Where effectiveness draws a connection between objectives and results obtained, efficiency measures the resources dedicated to achieving results. It provides accountability in terms of assessing how the use of resources (eg. human, information, and financial) compare to the results obtained. In this case, we are concerned about organisational performance. This distinction is pointed out for each country experience and is presented according to geographical area. The different police organisations are presented as follows: NORTH AMERICA New York Compstat Chicago Ongoing Evaluation of the Community Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) Quebec Public Administration Act SOUTH AMERICA Chile Table of Indicators Europe England and Wales Best Value and Performance Assessment Framework Belgium Strategic Seminar and Discussion Table France Organic Law for Finance Laws (LOLF) of 2001 OCEANIA Australia Federal procedure and adaptation of the Compstat method in some states. New Zealand Adaptation of the Compstat method 4 Given the scope of this topic and the number of studies devoted to measuring police performance, this paper begins by describing the police service, before examining each one individually. The paper describes the method used by the police in evaluating their performance in terms of effectiveness and/or efficiency, and discusses the limitations of these methods. For example, the tools for measurement that police organisations use may not always be comparable or applicable to all police services and the variables
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perf Police English FINAL
    MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE International Experiences Isabelle Lelandais Analyst and Project Officer In collaboration with Julie Bodson Analyst October 2007 Original version of paper written in French 1 MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE International Experience Isabelle Lelandais Analyst and Project Officer In collaboration with Julie Bodson Analyst, ICPC October 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Centre for the Prevention of Crime (ICPC) would like to thank the Association des directeurs de police. du Québec (ADPQ) (Quebec Association of Police Directors) for recommending the need for this international review. At the 9 th Annual ADPQ Conference, Serges Bruneau, Project Director at ICPC, unveiled the first draft of this report on measuring police performance practices. ICPC would also like to thank everyone who took the time to respond to our requests for information in the various countries addressed in this document. Finally, we would like to thank Benoît Dupont, Criminologist at the International Centre for Comparative Criminology, University of Montreal for his insightful comments and contribution to this document. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE CURRENT CONTEXT - MEASURING POLICE PERFORMANCE ......................................................................... 2 1. NEW YORK AND THE COMPSTAT SYSTEM ........................... 7 2. CHICAGO AND CHICAGO'S ALTERNATIVE POLICING STRATEGY (CAPS)............................................................ 11 3. THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT IN QUEBEC ............... 15 4. TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENCE KEY FIGURES 2017 EDITION 2 Defence Figures 2016 - 2017
    DEFENCE KEY FIGURES 2017 EDITION 2 Defence figures 2016 - 2017 1. The State’s main budgetary missions .................................... 5 2. The defence budget ................................................. 7 3. The ministry manpower in 2016 ....................................... 15 4. Defence pillar of the National Guard .................................... 20 5. Operational deployments of the French armed forces. 22 6. Equipment of the armed forces ....................................... 23 7. Comparisons of the defence budget between the United States and the European Union 26 8. Glossary ........................................................ 27 3 9. For further information .............................................. 29 Nota bene: the marginal difference that may exist in the totals is due to rounded figures. Introduction This brochure is a summary of the main figures concerning Defence. It presents the budgetary data, the number of personnel, the equipment of the armed forces and the forces deployed overseas. In accordance with the 2014-2019 Military Programming Law, with its updating in 2015 and with decisions following terrorist attacks of 2015 and 2016, the budget of the French Ministry for the Armed Forces was increased by €600M in 2017 in comparison to 2016 Finance Law (and has thus reached €32.7bn of resources). In the context of a very strong military activity of the French armed forces (beyond operational contracts), the budget of the French Ministry for the Armed Forces has aimed to enhance the means for the benefit of operational units, intelligence and cyber defence while preserving preparation for the future and equipment renewal. It also makes it possible the implementation of measures relating to the improvement of the condition of personnel. Budgetary credits in 2017 Initial Finance Law have thus been increased by €600M in comparison to 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Sector Governance: Turkey and Europe
    Türkiye'nin uzun süredir devam eden demokratikleflme sorunlar›na bilimsel The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV) aims to find social temelli katk›larda bulunmay› amaçlayan Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler science-based solutions to Turkey's longitudinal democratization-oriented problems. Vakf› (TESEV), 2004 y›l›ndan beri “Güvenlik Sektöründe Demokratik Aç›l›mlar Since 2004, we continue on with our projects assembled together under the heading / Güvenlik Sektörü Reformu” bafll›kl› projeler öbe¤ini sürdürüyor. Bir “düflünce of “Democratic Horizons in the Security Sector/Security Sector Reform”. As a “think GÜVENL‹K SECURITY üretim merkezi” olan TESEV, gündelik siyasetin gerilimli dünyas›na ve bu tank”, TESEV strives to keep at a distance from the conflictual and tense world of dünyan›n inifl-ç›k›fll› dalgalanmalar›na tabi olmamaya çabalayarak ve sosyal daily politics and its ebbs and flows. Instead we try to emulate a long-term “cool- bilimler yöntemlerini seferber ederek daha uzun soluklu, uzun vadeye yay›lm›fl headed” perspective premised on social scientific methods and advocacy strategies. ve “serinkanl›” bir bak›fl› infla etmeye çabal›yor. GÜVENL‹K SEKTÖRÜ YÖNET‹fi‹M‹: TÜRK‹YE VE AVRUPA SECURITY SECTOR GOVERNANCE: TURKEY AND EUROPE SEKTÖRÜ SECTOR In this broader perspective, we follow the example of contemporary democracies Sivilleflme olarak ifade edilebilecek genel bir siyasi çerçeveye oturan ve bu and place the debates -which are otherwise known as “civilianization” in Turkey yönüyle de hararetli çat›flmalar yaratan tart›flmalar› ise, ça¤dafl demokrasilerde and thus creates heated controversies- under the headings of the “Democratic oldu¤u gibi “Güvenlik Sektörünün Demokratik Gözetimi” ya da “Güvenlik Sektörü Oversight of the Security Sector” or “Security Sector Reform”.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Gendarmerie
    Presentation of the maritime gendarmerie On the occasion of.... On the ... in ..... MARITIME GENDARMERIE 1791 - 1970 A specialized military police adapted to the maritime world Positioned for the benefit of the French navy Chief of Staff MARITIME GENDARMERIE - A specialized military police adapted to the maritime world - Positioned for the benefit of the French navy Chief of Staff GENERAL LAYOUT Historical overview Organization Missions Assets Units Personnel / staff Training International issues HISTORICAL OVERVIEW HISTORICAL OVERVIEW First mention in 1340 during the battle of the Écluse In 1648 Colbert issued a government decree organizing the provosts and archers of the Navy. “They will ride their horses along the coasts and in the ports of our seas, clear and protect thereof from burglars and pirates, will pursue the naval forces deserters and will prosecute them, with a power of justice control for the execution of the judgements and commissions issued by the Navy.” In 1970 the French maritime gendarmerie becomes a specialized component of the national gendarmerie positioned for the benefit of the French navy Chief of Staff (Reasserted in the 2009 law related to the gendarmerie). 1974: First patrol boats 1986: PATRAS (fast patrol boats) 1991: Transfer of the DG patrol crafts 1997: PCG (Gend. coastal patrol boats) 2003: VCSM (coastal patrol crafts) PGNG (project of new generation patrol boats) ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION MIOMCTI (Ministry of Interior, overseas, Ministry of Defence local authorities and immigration) Chief of Defence
    [Show full text]
  • National Borders, Surveillance, and Counter-Terrorism Tools In
    Border Security in the Al-Qaeda Era Border Security in the Al-Qaeda Era EDITED BY JOHN A. WINTERDYK KELLY W. SUNDBERG Boca Raton London New York CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2010 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-8544-0 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher can- not assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]