DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Identification Marking and Tagging Methods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish Identification Marking and Tagging Methods REPORT 04/06/2020 Reg. no. 5.2.18-00981/2018 Fish identification Marking and tagging methods Michael Axelsson, University of Gothenburg, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences Erik Peterson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Resources Albin Gräns, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Environment and Health Per E Ljung, the Swedish 3Rs Center The Swedish 3Rs Center is a part of the Swedish Board of Agriculture [email protected] │ Twitter: @Swedish3Rs 1 Contents Background ...................................................................................................... 3 Things to consider when marking and tagging ............................................ 3 Education, training and ethical approval for animal research ............................................................. 3 Work environment considerations ....................................................................................................... 4 Anaesthesia .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Known impacts of having a tag ........................................................................................................... 4 Methods ............................................................................................................ 6 Symbols and their meanings ................................................................................................................ 6 Brief description of the methods ......................................................................................................... 7 Guide for when you need to be able to distinguish between individuals ............................................ 8 Guide for when you do not need to be able to distinguish between individuals ................................. 9 Biotelemetry/biologger – internal...................................................................................................... 10 Biotelemetry/biologger – external ..................................................................................................... 11 Carlin tags ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Chemical branding ............................................................................................................................ 13 Clipping the adipose fin .................................................................................................................... 14 Clipping the maxilla .......................................................................................................................... 15 Clipping the pelvic fin ....................................................................................................................... 16 Coded-wire tags ................................................................................................................................. 17 Dart tags ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Freeze branding ................................................................................................................................. 19 Genetic identification ........................................................................................................................ 20 Microchip (PITtag, RFID) ................................................................................................................. 21 Natural patterns and unique markings ............................................................................................... 22 Otolith marking ................................................................................................................................. 23 P-chip ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Short-term marking with plastic beads or filaments .......................................................................... 25 Spaghetti tags .................................................................................................................................... 26 Spray marking ................................................................................................................................... 27 Streamer tags ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Tattoo methods .................................................................................................................................. 29 T-bar anchor tags ............................................................................................................................... 30 VI alpha tags ...................................................................................................................................... 31 VIE (Visible Implant Elastomer)....................................................................................................... 32 References ..................................................................................................... 33 The Swedish 3Rs Center is a part of the Swedish Board of Agriculture [email protected] │ Twitter: @Swedish3Rs 2 Background In order to be able to study fish movement patterns, population dynamics, different physiological variables or to be able to track an individual over a period of time, it is often necessary to be able to identify an individual fish for a shorter or extended period of time. This can sometimes be done using the animal’s natural patterns and other unique markings. In other cases, the animal must be marked or tagged in some way, which often involves a certain degree of handling and/or surgery. A number of scientific studies have been done to evaluate different marking and tagging methods. Several other documents describe and compare different methods, including a Swedish report on different marking and tagging methods for salmonids. A scientific compilation of identification methods for small fish was also recently published. But there is a lack of easy-to-follow guidance that considers the welfare of fish, economic aspects and the user’s perspective. There is a demand for this type of guidance, from the regional ethical committees on animal experiments and other groups. On behalf of Sweden’s National Committee for the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes we have reviewed commonly used methods of marking, tagging and identifying fish. The report contains methods that are suitable for use in lakes, watercourses and seas, but also controlled environments, such as aquariums, fish farming cages or laboratory environments. For each method reviewed here, we go over the most important factors for the user and the impact on the fish. We have listed the references we used by title and method at the end of the report. The purpose of the report is to assist the user in choosing the most suitable method and should therefore not be seen as a comprehensive handbook for marking and tagging fish. Our goal in publishing this report is to help ensure that the correct marking and tagging methods are used for the right purposes, thereby contributing to a reduction in the negative impact on the animals and reducing the number of animals used. Things to consider when marking and tagging There are more than 34,000 fish species across the world, and since their morphology, physiology and behaviour vary, these factors needs to be considered when choosing a marking or tagging method. It is also important that fish capture and handling is well planned and done as quickly and gently as possible. Many fish species are covered by a protective mucus layer, and it is therefore important that all handling is done in a way that has as little impact as possible on the mucus layer. For example, if netting is necessary, only knotless, silicone-coated nets should be used. Sock nets, where the fish are not exposed to air at all, are optimal. If fish are handled by hand, it is important that your hands are wet or that you use latex gloves or similar. It is also important to minimise the amount of time fish are exposed to air, especially if the species is sensitive to air exposure. In many cases, the fish must be anaesthetized before marking or tagging. Some fish, such as eels and carp, are less sensitive to air exposure, but if the handling and the marking or tagging procedure takes longer than 10 seconds, the fish should normally be ventilated by flushing oxygenated water over the gills during the procedure. During surgical procedures it is important to work with clean, sharp instruments and clean surfaces to minimise the risk of infection. The instruments, including cannulas, must be disinfected with 70% alcohol or with other disinfectants, such as Cidex. Education, training and ethical approval for animal research For simpler procedures, you should have completed a fish marking and tagging course, preferably a course with the content described in SJVFS 2019:25, Chapter 5, Section 4, which in Sweden is given by the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. For the more advanced procedures, such as the implantation of devices in the abdominal cavity, you should also have attended an LAS (Laboratory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes
    click for previous page BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes GENERAL REMARKS by K.E. Carpenter, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA ony fishes constitute the bulk, by far, of both the diversity and total landings of marine organisms encoun- Btered in fisheries of the Western Central Atlantic.They are found in all macrofaunal marine and estuarine habitats and exhibit a lavish array of adaptations to these environments. This extreme diversity of form and taxa presents an exceptional challenge for identification. There are 30 orders and 269 families of bony fishes presented in this guide, representing all families known from the area. Each order and family presents a unique suite of taxonomic problems and relevant characters. The purpose of this preliminary section on technical terms and guide to orders and families is to serve as an introduction and initial identification guide to this taxonomic diversity. It should also serve as a general reference for those features most commonly used in identification of bony fishes throughout the remaining volumes. However, I cannot begin to introduce the many facets of fish biology relevant to understanding the diversity of fishes in a few pages. For this, the reader is directed to one of the several general texts on fish biology such as the ones by Bond (1996), Moyle and Cech (1996), and Helfman et al.(1997) listed below. A general introduction to the fisheries of bony fishes in this region is given in the introduction to these volumes. Taxonomic details relevant to a specific family are explained under each of the appropriate family sections. The classification of bony fishes continues to transform as our knowledge of their evolutionary relationships improves.
    [Show full text]
  • Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 412:The 41–57 Hoosier(2014) cavefish, a new and endangered species( Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis)... 41 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.412.7245 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The Hoosier cavefish, a new and endangered species (Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis) from the caves of southern Indiana Prosanta Chakrabarty1,†, Jacques A. Prejean1,‡, Matthew L. Niemiller1,2,§ 1 Museum of Natural Science, Ichthyology Section, 119 Foster Hall, Department of Biological Sciences, Loui- siana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA 2 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, 200 Thomas Hunt Morgan Building, Lexington, KY 40506, USA † http://zoobank.org/0983DBAB-2F7E-477E-9138-63CED74455D3 ‡ http://zoobank.org/C71C7313-142D-4A34-AA9F-16F6757F15D1 § http://zoobank.org/8A0C3B1F-7D0A-4801-8299-D03B6C22AD34 Corresponding author: Prosanta Chakrabarty ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Baldwin | Received 12 February 2014 | Accepted 13 May 2014 | Published 29 May 2014 http://zoobank.org/C618D622-395E-4FB7-B2DE-16C65053762F Citation: Chakrabarty P, Prejean JA, Niemiller ML (2014) The Hoosier cavefish, a new and endangered species (Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis) from the caves of southern Indiana. ZooKeys 412: 41–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.412.7245 Abstract We describe a new species of amblyopsid cavefish (Percopsiformes: Amblyopsidae) in the genus Amblyopsis from subterranean habitats of southern Indiana, USA. The Hoosier Cavefish, Amblyopsis hoosieri sp. n., is distinguished from A. spelaea, its only congener, based on genetic, geographic, and morphological evi- dence. Several morphological features distinguish the new species, including a much plumper, Bibendum- like wrinkled body with rounded fins, and the absence of a premature stop codon in the gene rhodopsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Batoid Locomotion: Effects of Speed on Pectoral Fin Deformation in the Little Skate, Leucoraja Erinacea Valentina Di Santo1,*, Erin L
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 705-712 doi:10.1242/jeb.148767 RESEARCH ARTICLE Batoid locomotion: effects of speed on pectoral fin deformation in the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea Valentina Di Santo1,*, Erin L. Blevins1,2 and George V. Lauder1 ABSTRACT more efficient at higher speeds and for long-distance translocations Most batoids have a unique swimming mode in which thrust is (Di Santo and Kenaley, 2016). Although many batoid species are generated by either oscillating or undulating expanded pectoral fins accurately described by these two extreme modes, several species that form a disc. Only one previous study of the freshwater stingray has fall into a continuum between 0.5 and 1.0 wave, and are defined as quantified three-dimensional motions of the wing, and no comparable ‘semi-oscillators’ (Schaefer and Summers, 2005). data are available for marine batoid species that may differ The mechanics of propulsion in cartilaginous fishes have been considerably in their mode of locomotion. Here, we investigate three- investigated over the years through studies of morphology, dimensional kinematics of the pectoral wing of the little skate, kinematics, hydrodynamics, muscle activity and energetics Leucoraja erinacea, swimming steadily at two speeds [1 and (Daniel, 1988; Di Santo and Kenaley, 2016; Donley and 2 body lengths (BL) s−1]. We measured the motion of nine points in Shadwick, 2003; Fontanella et al., 2013; Lauder, 2015; Lauder three dimensions during wing oscillation and determined that there are and Di Santo, 2015; Porter et al., 2011; Rosenberger and Westneat, significant differences in movement amplitude among wing locations, 1999; Rosenblum et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Gobiodon Winterbottomi, a New Goby (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Gobiidae) from Iriomote-Jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, Japan
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, Suppl. 6, pp. 59–65, March 30, 2012 Gobiodon winterbottomi, a New Goby (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Gobiidae) from Iriomote-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, Japan Toshiyuki Suzuki1, Korechika Yano2 and Hiroshi Senou3 1 Kawanishi-midoridai Senior High School, 1–8 Kouyoudai, Kawanishi, Hyogo 666–0115, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Dive Service Yano, 537 Uehara, Taketomi-cho, Okinawa 907–1541, Japan 3 Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, 499 Iryuda, Odawara, Kanagawa 250–0031, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The gobiid ¿sh Gobiodon winterbottomi is described as a new species from three spec- imens (19.0–32.9 mm SL) collected from Echinopora lamellose, the plate-shaped coral of the fam- ily Faviidae, in 5 m depth on the reef slope off Iriomote-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. It is characterized by the following in combination: the jaw teeth subequal in shape and size; lack of post-symphysial canine teeth; lack of an interopercle-isthmus groove; a narrow gill opening; lack of elongated dorsal-¿n spines; large second dorsal, anal and pelvic ¿ns; 15 or 16 pectoral-¿n rays; and head, body and ¿ns gray, absence of stripes or other markings when fresh or alive. Key words: Gobiodon winterbottomi, new species, Gobiidae, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Gobiodon Bleeker, 1856 is an Indo-Paci¿c Sawada and Arai, 1972 (validity questionable), gobiid ¿sh genus, comprising often colorful, Gobiodon axillaris De Viz, 1884, Gobiodon bro- tropical species living in obligate commensal chus (Harold and Winterbottom, 1999), Gobio- association with reef-building corals.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxyeleotris Colasi (Teleostei: Eleotridae), a New Blind Cave Fish from Lengguru in West Papua, Indonesia
    Oxyeleotris colasi (Teleostei: Eleotridae), a new blind cave fish from Lengguru in West Papua, Indonesia by Laurent POUYAUD* (1), KADARUSMAN (1, 2), Renny K. HADIATY (3), Jacques SLEMBROUCK (1), Napoleon LEMAUK (4), Ruby V. KUSUMAH (5) & Philippe KEITH (6) ABSTRACT. - Oxyeleotris colasi is the first hypogean fish recorded from West Papua. The habitat consists of a freshwater pool in the cave of Jabuenggara located in the heart of Seraran anticline in the limestone karst of Lengguru. The new spe- cies is most closely related to the blind cave fishO. caeca described by Allen (1996) from eastern New Guinea. The two troglomorphic species are hypothesised to be related to O. fimbriata, an epigean freshwater gudgeon that ranges widely in New Guinea and northern Australia (Allen, 1996). Oxyeleotris colasi differs from its congeners by the absence of eyes, its skin and fins being totally depigmented, the presence of a well developed sensory papillae system partly consisting of low raised fleshy ridges on each side of the head, a reduced number of cephalic sensory pores, a reduced number of scales on head and body, a long head with a short snout length, a narrow mouth width and a long upper jaw length, body shape with a shallow anterior body depth and narrow body width, a long and deep caudal peduncle, long predorsal and prepectoral lengths, and a long pectoral fin. RÉSUMÉ. - Oxyeleotris colasi, une nouvelle espèce de poisson cavernicole de Lengguru en Papouasie occidentale (Teleostei : Eleotridae). Oxyeleotris colasi est la première espèce de poisson hypogée décrite de Papouasie occidentale. Elle a été capturée dans un trou d’eau douce situé dans la grotte de Jabuenggara au cœur de l’anticlinal de Seraran dans le karst de Lengguru.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics of Locomotion in Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras
    5 Biomechanics of Locomotion in Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras Anabela M.R. Maia, Cheryl A.D. Wilga, and George V. Lauder CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction 125 5.1.1 Approaches to Studying Locomotion in Chondrichthyans 125 5.1.2 Diversity of Locomotory Modes in Chondrichthyans 127 5.1.3 Body Form and Fin Shapes 127 5.2 Locomotion in Sharks 128 5.2.1 Function of the Body during Steady Locomotion and Vertical Maneuvering 128 5.2.2 Function of the Caudal Fin during Steady Locomotion and Vertical Maneuvering 130 5.2.3 Function of the Pectoral Fins during Locomotion 134 5.2.3.1 Anatomy of the Pectoral Fins 134 5.2.3.2 Role of the Pectoral Fins during Steady Swimming 136 5.2.3.3 Role of the Pectoral Fins during Vertical Maneuvering 138 5.2.3.4 Function of the Pectoral Fins during Benthic Station-Holding 139 5.2.3.5 Motor Activity in the Pectoral Fins 139 5.2.4 Routine Maneuvers and Escape Responses 140 5.2.5 Synthesis 141 5.3 Locomotion in Skates and Rays 142 5.4 Locomotion in Holocephalans 145 5.5 Material Properties of Chondrichthyan Locomotor Structures 146 5.6 Future Directions 147 Acknowledgments 148 References 148 5.1.1 Approaches to Studying 5.1 Introduction Locomotion in Chondrichthyans The body form of sharks is notable for the distinctive Historically, many attempts have been made to under- heterocercal tail with external morphological asymme- stand the function of the median and paired fins in try present in most taxa and the ventrolateral winglike sharks and rays, and these studies have included work pectoral fins extending laterally from the body (Figure with models (Affleck.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder GOBIOIDEI ELEOTRIDAE Sleepers by E.O
    click for previous page 1778 Bony Fishes Suborder GOBIOIDEI ELEOTRIDAE Sleepers by E.O. Murdy, National Science Foundation, Virginia, USA and D.F. Hoese, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia iagnostic characters: Small to medium-sized (most do not exceed 20 cm, although Gobiomorus from Dthis area may reach 60 cm). Typically, body stout; head short and broad; snout blunt; gill membranes broadly joined to isthmus. Teeth usually small, conical and in several rows in jaws. Six branchiostegal rays. Two separate dorsal fins, first dorsal fin with 6 or 7 weak spines, second dorsal fin with 1 weak spine followed by 6 to 12 soft rays; second dorsal fin and anal fin relatively short-based; origin of anal fin just posterior to vertical with origin of second dorsal fin; terminal ray of second dorsal and anal fins divided to its base (but counted as a single element);anal fin with 1 weak spine followed by 6 to 12 soft rays;caudal fin broad and rounded, compris- ing 15 or 17 segmented rays; pectoral fin broad with 14 to 25 soft rays; pelvic fin long with 1 spine and 5 soft rays.Pelvic fins separate and not connected by a membrane.Scales large and either cycloid or ctenoid.No lateral line on body. Head typically scaled, scales being either cycloid or ctenoid with a series of sensory ca- nals and pores as well as cutaneous papillae. Colour: not brightly coloured, most are light or dark brown or olive with some metallic glints. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Typically occur in fresh or brackish waters, although some species are truly marine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ampullae of Lorenzini Eye Nostrils 5 Gill Slits First Dorsal Fin Pectoral
    Ampullae of Lorenzini Caudal fin The Ampullae of Lorenzini are special sensing organs Anatomy of a Great White Shark Otherwise know as the tail fin, sharks use this to propel itself that sharks use to detect electric and magnetic fields. through the water. The tail fin is one of the most important Each ampulla consists of a jelly-filled canal opening parts of the entire shark anatomy. The nature of this fin does to the surface by a pore in the skin. Each ampulla Eye 5 Gill Slits First Dorsal Fin not allow for backwards movement. Therefore, if a shark functions as an independent receptor that measures needs to move away from an object, it is forced to either drift White sharks do not have eyelids, Sharks breathe by extracting oxygen from The main purpose of the dorsal fin is to stabilize the animal against rolling the electric potential difference between the ampullary backwards or to turn away from it and continue in a forwards instead they roll their eyes back for the water as it moves over and past their and to assist in sudden turns. They are like a human finger print, no two are pore opening and the body interior. Although the role of direction. protection. The iris of a white shark gills. The normal cruising speed is believed the same and dorsal fins are use in the identifications of individual sharks. these gel-filled pores is not completely clear, several is not black, it’s a very dark blue. to be 3.5 km/hr. However, the minimum functions of the ampullary electrosense have been speed to maintain oxygen requirements proposed, including detection of prey, predators and is likely to be much less.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Identification Guide Depicts More Than 50 Species of Fish Commonly Encoun- Make the Proper Identification of Every Fish Caught
    he identification of different spe- Most species of fish are distinctive in appear- ance and relatively easy to identify. However, cies of fish has become an im- closely related species, such as members of the portant concern for recreational same “family” of fish, can present problems. For these species it is important to look for certain fishermen. The proliferation of T distinctive characteristics to make a positive regulations relating to minimum identification. sizes and possession limits compels fishermen to The ensuing fish identification guide depicts more than 50 species of fish commonly encoun- make the proper identification of every fish caught. tered in Virginia waters. In addition to color illustrations of each species, the description of each species lists the distinctive characteristics which enable a positive identification. Total Length FIRST DORSAL FIN Fork Length SECOND NUCHAL DORSAL FIN BAND SQUARE TAIL NARES FORKED TAIL GILL COVER (Operculum) CAUDAL LATRAL PEDUNCLE CHIN BARBELS LINE PECTORAL CAUDAL FIN ANAL FINS FIN PELVIC FINS GILL RAKERS GILL ARCH UNDERSIDE OF GILL COVER GILL RAKER GILL FILAMENTS GILL FILAMENTS DEFINITIONS Anal Fin – The fin on the bottom of fish located between GILL ARCHES 1st the anal vent (hole) and the tail. 2nd 3rd Barbels – Slender strands extending from the chins of 4th some fish (often appearing similar to whiskers) which per- form a sensory function. Caudal Fin – The tail fin of fish. Nuchal Band – A dark band extending from behind or Caudal Peduncle – The narrow portion of a fish’s body near the eye of a fish across the back of the neck toward immediately in front of the tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelvic Fin Flexibility in Tree Climbing Fish
    G Model ZOOL-25524; No. of Pages 7 ARTICLE IN PRESS Zoology xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/zool The significance of pelvic fin flexibility for tree climbing fish a b a,b c Adhityo Wicaksono , Saifullah Hidayat , Yudithia Damayanti , Desmond Soo Mun Jin , a b,∗ a,∗ Erly Sintya , Bambang Retnoaji , Parvez Alam a Laboratory of Paper Coating and Converting, Centre for Functional Materials, Abo Akademi University, Porthaninkatu 3, 20500 Turku, Finland b Laboratory of Animal Embryology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia c Rapid Gain Global Corporation, Singapore a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: In this article, we compare the characteristics of biomechanical attachment exhibited by two morpholog- Received 1 March 2016 ically different mudskipper species, Boleophthalmus boddarti (with fused pelvic fins) and Periophthalmus Received in revised form 14 April 2016 variabilis (with unfused pelvic fins). P. variabilis is a tree and rock climber while B. boddarti dwells in the Accepted 17 June 2016 muddy shallows and is unable to climb. Our aim in this article is to determine whether it is predominantly Available online xxx chemical or morphological properties of the pelvic fins from each species that may allow P. variabilis to climb trees whilst preventing B. boddarti from doing the same. To fulfil our objective we perform friction Keywords: and suction resistance tests, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the mucosal secretions under Mudskipper the fins, direct geometrical measurements and finite element modelling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Pelvic Fins for Benthic Locomotion During Foraging Behavior in Potamotrygon Motoro (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae)
    ZOOLOGIA 32 (3): 179–186, June 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702015000300001 The use of pelvic fins for benthic locomotion during foraging behavior in Potamotrygon motoro (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) Akemi Shibuya1,2,*, Marcelo R. de Carvalho1, Jansen Zuanon2 & Sho Tanaka3 1Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo. Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, 101, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2 Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia. Avenida André Araújo 2936, Aleixo, 69060-001 Manaus, AM, Brazil. 3 School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University. 3-20-1 Orido, 424-8610, Shimizu, Shizuoka, Japan. * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Synchronized bipedal movements of the pelvic fins provide propulsion (punting) during displacement on the substrate in batoids with benthic locomotion. In skates (Rajidae) this mechanism is mainly generated by the crural cartilages. Although lacking these anatomical structures, some stingray species show modifications of their pelvic fins to aid in benthic locomotion. This study describes the use of the pelvic fins for locomotory performance and body re- orientation in the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) during foraging. Pelvic fin move- ments of juvenile individuals of P. motoro were recorded in ventral view by a high-speed camera at 250-500 fields/s-1. Potamotrygon motoro presented synchronous, alternating and unilateral movements of the pelvic fins, similar to those reported in skates. Synchronous movements were employed during straightforward motion for pushing the body off the substrate as well as for strike feeding, whereas unilateral movements were used to maneuver the body to the right or left during both locomotion and prey capture.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Pelvic Fin Ray Removal on Survival and Growth of Bull Trout
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:953–959, 2006 [Management Brief] Ó Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2006 DOI: 10.1577/M05-119.1 Effect of Pelvic Fin Ray Removal on Survival and Growth of Bull Trout 1 NIKOLAS D. ZYMONAS* AND THOMAS E. MCMAHON Ecology Department, Fish and Wildlife Program, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA Abstract.—Fin rays offer a viable alternative to scales and However, fin ray removal may be an unacceptable otoliths for determining ages of threatened salmonids, but aging technique if it impairs growth or survival of rare information on potential side effects from their removal is species (Collins and Smith 1996). limited. We conducted a laboratory study to assess the effects Potential adverse effects of fin removal include a of removal of three pelvic fin rays on the survival and growth short-term physiological stress response (Sharpe et al. of two age-groups of bull trout Salvelinus confluentus (age 3: 209–298 mm standard length [SL]; age 4: 294–362 mm SL). 1998) and infection at the removal site (Fry 1961). Survival was similar between fin-ray-excised fish (73%) and Potential longer-term impairments include reduced control fish (69%) at each stage during the 169-d study (P . station-holding ability (Arnold et al. 1991), reduced 0.85). Survival was also similar within age-3 (fin ray excision: growth (Saunders and Allen 1967; Skaugstad 1990), 39%; control: 30%; P . 0.42) and age-4 bull trout (fin ray and reduced survival (Ricker 1949; Coble 1971; Nicola excision: 94%; control: 94%; P .
    [Show full text]