INDIAN BUREAU of MINES Hyderabad Regional Office
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INDIAN BUREAU OF MINES MINERALS DEVELOPMEMT AND REGULATION DIVISION Review and updation of Mining Plan REPORT Hyderabad regional office Mine file No : AP/NLG/LST-21/HYD Mine code : 38APR14020 (i) Name of the Inspecting : M001( ) S K MUDULI Officer and ID No. (ii) Designation : Junior Mining Geologist (iii) Accompaning mine : V.RAMACHANDRAM MINES MANAGER Official with Designation (iv) Date of Inspection : 13/10/2017 (v) Prev.inspection date : PART-I : GENERAL INFORMATION 1. (a) Mine Name : SRI VENKATESWARA (b) Registration NO. : (c) Category : A Manual (d) Type of Working : Opencast (e) Postal address State : TELANGANA District : NALGONDA Village : CHINTALAPALEM Taluka : MELLACHERVU Post office : Pin Code : 508246 FAX No. : 040-23353093 E-mail : [email protected] Phone : 04023353096 (f) Police Station : JAGGAIAHPET (g) First opening date : 24/12/1993 (h) Weekly day of rest : SUN 2. Address for : CHINTAPALEM VILLAGE correspondance MELLACHERVU MANDAL NALGONDA DISTRICT 3. (a) Lease Number : APR0025 (b) Lease area : .69 (c) Period of lease : 20 (d) Date of Expiry : 21/05/2005 4. Mineral worked : LIMESTONE Main PAGE : 2 5. Name and Address of the Lessee : M/S ANJANI PORTLAND CEMENT LTD SITHA NILAYAM 153 DWARAKAPURI COLONY PUNJAGUTTA HYDERABAD TELANGANA Phone:3353093 FAX :40-3353093 Owner : K.VISHNU RAJU M/S. ANJANI PORTLAND CEMENT LTD. SUTA NILAYAM, 153, DARAKAPUERI COLO PUNJAGUTTA, HYDERABAD. NALGONDA TELANGANA Phone: FAX : Agent : S.N.RAJU CHINTHAPALEM VILLAGE GUDIMALKAPURAM nALGONDA DIST. NALGONDA TELANGANA Phone: 08683-230160 FAX : 08683-230024 Manager Name : V.RAMACHANDRAM Qualification : DIPLOM IN MINING Appointment/ : 05/06/2007 Termination date 6. Date of approval of Mining : Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 23/12/2009 Plan/Scheme of Mining MP modif under 17(3) MCR 2016 04/05/2016 PAGE : 3 PART - II : OBSERVATION/COMMENTS OF INSPECTING OFFICERS Exploration : Sl.No. Item Proposals Actual work Remarks 1a Backlog of 2016-17 -No In 2016-17 a total of previous year Bore holes 7nos Core bore holes been proposed drilled for 207m, out of the 10 nos BH proposed in the year 2017- 18.Balance 3 BHs to be drilled. 1b Exploration over 22.77 Ha under G2 level lease area for of exploration geological axis 1 or 2 1c Exploration - JP Kordrilling,Rs Agencies and 478603/- Expenditure in lakh rupees during the year 1d Balance area to Nil 11.22 Ha be explored to bring Geological axis in 1 or 2 1e Balance reserve - 5.08 million tonnes as on 01/04/20 1f General remarks - - of inspecting officers on geology, exploration etc Development : Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 2a Location of Central Part Mine is not working due development of the ML to lack of Environmental w.r.t.lease area clearance. 2b Separate benches No proposal NA in topsoil, overburden and minerals (Rule 15) 2c Stripping ratio 1:0 NA as no mining activity or ore to OB took place due to want ratio of EC. 2d Quantity of NA NA topsoil generation in m3 2e Quantity of NA NA overburden generation in m3 PAGE : 4 2f General remarks - - Mine is not of inspecting working due to officers on lack of development of environmental pit w.r.t. type clearance. of deposit etc Exploitation: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 3a Number of pit ONE As on date of inspection Mine is not proposed for there is one pit. working due to production lack of environmental clearance. 3b Quantity of ROM 149989.56 Nil mineral tonnes production proposed 3c Recovery of 100% No production Mine is not sailable/usable working due to mineral from ROM lack of production environmental clearance. 3d Quantity of Not proposed NA mineral reject generation 3e Grade of mineral Not proposed. NA.There is no rejects generation of Mineral generation and rejections. The threshold value Threshold value is 35% declared. Cao content. 3f Quantity of sub Not proposed. NA grade mineral generation. 3g Grade of sub Not proposed NA grade mineral generation 3h Manual / Not proposed. NA Mechanised method adopted for segregating from ROM 3i Any analysis or Not proposed Nil beneficiation study proposed and carried out for sub grade mineral and rejects. PAGE : 5 3j Provision of Proposed Mine not working due to drilling and want of environmental blasting in clearance mineral benches 3k Provision of Proposed Mine not working due to mining want of environmental machineries in clearance. mineral benches 3l Whether height Proposed. Mine is not of benches in working.Bench heights overburden and have been maintained as mineral suitable per the proposal. for method of mining proposed in MP/SOM 3m Total area 3.446 ha covered under excavation/pits 3n Ore to OB ratio Not Proposed NA for the pit/mine during the year. 3o Total area put Mining - 3.446 ha in use under Infrastructure - 0.0243 different heads ha at the end of Roads - 0.15 ha year Green Belt - 1.20 ha 3p Production of 2016-17- 2012-13 - 5500 tonnes ROM mineral 149989.56 2013-14 - 23900 tonnes during the last tonnes 2014-15 - 15415 tonnes five year period 2015-16 - NIL tonnes as applicable 2016-17 - NIL tonnes 3q General remarks Mechanised method of of inspecting opencast mining is officers on practiced. method of mining etc. Solid Waste Management - Dumping: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 4a Separate dumping NA NA of topsoil, OB and mineral rejects (Rule 32,33) 4b Location of NA NA topsoil, OB and mineral reject dumps PAGE : 6 4c Number of dumps NA Nil within lease area and outside of lease area 4d Location of NA NA dumps w.r.t. ultimate pit limit (Rule 16) 4e Number of active NA Nil and alive dumps. 4f Number of dead NA Nil dumps. 4g Number of dumps No proposal Nil established. 4h Whether No proposal NA Retaining wall or garland drain all along dumps are there. 4i Length of No proposal NA Retaining wall or garland drain all along dumps 4j Number of No proposal NA settling ponds 4k Specific There exists no waste No top soil,OB and comments of dump. mineral reject inspecting generation officer on waste observed. dump management Solid Waste Management - Backfilling: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 5a Status of part No proposal No part of the ML area or full is mature for back extraction of filling. mineral from mined out area before starting backfilling. 5b Area under No proposal No part of the ML area backfilling of is mature for back mined out area filling. 5c Concurrent use No proposal No top soil exists in of topsoil for the mine. restoration or rehabilitation of mineral out area (Rule 32) PAGE : 7 5d Total area No proposal No part of the ML area fully reclaimed is mature for back and filling,reclaimation and rehabilitated rehabilitation. 5e General remarks No proposal No part of the ML area of inspecting is mature for back officers on filling and reclamation. backfilling and reclamation etc. Progressive Mine Clousre Plan: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 6a Whether Annual - Mine not working.Yes report on PMCP submitted on time and correctly. Rule 23 E(2). 6b Area available No proposal No part of the ML area for is mature. rehabilitation (ha) . 6c afforestation 5200 nos Nil done (ha). saplings in 2016-17 6d No. of saplings 5200 nos Nil planted during the year 6e Cumulative no Information not .of plants available. 6f Any other method NA NA of rehabilitation 6g Cost incurred on Proposed Nil watch and care during the year 6h Compliance on No proposal No part of the ML area reclamation and is mature. rehabilitation by backfilling (i) Voids available for backfilling ( Lx B x D 6m Compliance of No proposal There is no waste land rehabilitation within the ML area. of waste land within lease (i)afforestation PAGE : 8 6p Compliance of Proposed Carried out as proposed environmental and results are within monitoring (core the limit. zone and buffer zone) 6q General remarks of inspecting officers on PMCP compliance and progressive closure operations etc. Mineral Conservation: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 7a ROM Mineral NA Nil dispatch or grade-wise sorting within lease area 7b Method of grade- NA NA wise mineral sorting i.e. manual or mechanical. 7c Different grade NA NA of mineral sorted out at mines. 7d Any NA NA beneficiation process at mines . 7e General remarks NA Mine is not working due of inspecting to want of environmental officer on clearance.Further no Mineral beneficiation process is conservation and proposed and carried out beneficiation in the ML area. issues Environment: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 8a Separate removal No proposal - and utilization of topsoil (Rule 32) PAGE : 9 8b Concurrent use NA NA or storage of topsoil 8c Separate dumps No proposal No OB,waste rock, for overburden, mineral reject found waste rock, within the ML. rejects and fines (Rule 33) 8d Use of No proposal NA overburden, waste rock, rejects and fines dumps for restoring the land to its original use 8e Phased No proposal NA restoration, reclamation and rehabilitation of lands affected by mining operations (Pits, dumps etc) 8f Baseline - Besides thorny bushes information on there exists, 250 existence of saplings exists in the plantation and ML area. additional plantation done (Rule 41) 8g Survival rate NA No plantaion carried out. 8h Water sprinkling Proposed Mine not working due to on roads to lack of environmental control airborne clearance. dust 8i General remarks NA NA of inspecting officer on aesthetic beauty in and around mines area Compliance of Rule 45: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 9a Status of MR and AR to MR & AR Submitted.