Plains, Steps, Hilly Relief and Valleys in Northern Sweden – Review, Interpretations and Implications for Conclusions on Phanerozoic Tectonics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plains, Steps, Hilly Relief and Valleys in Northern Sweden – Review, Interpretations and Implications for Conclusions on Phanerozoic Tectonics SGU Research Paper C 838 Research Paper C 838 Plains, steps, hilly relief and valleys in northern Sweden – review, interpretations and implications for conclusions on Phanerozoic tectonics Karna Lidmar-Bergström & Mats Olvmo Plains, steps, hilly relief and valleys in northern Sweden interpretations – review, and implications for implications and conclusions on conclusions Phanerozoic tectonics Phanerozoic C 838 Plains, steps, hilly relief and valleys in northern Sweden – review, interpretations and implications for conclusions on Phanerozoic tectonics Karna Lidmar-Bergström & Mats Olvmo Sveriges geologiska undersökning 2015 ISSN 1103-3371 ISBN 978-91-7403-308-3 Cover: Hilly relief, west of Borlänge, surrounding the confluence of Västerdalälven and Österdalälven. Map construction: Mats Olvmo. Data sources: GSD-Elevation data, Grid 2+ and GSD-Terrängkartan from Lantmäteriet. © Sveriges geologiska undersökning Layout: Jeanette Bergman Weihed, SGU Tryck: Elanders Sverige AB, 2015 Innehåll Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Bedrock and glaciation ................................................................................................................................. 7 Overview of relief types .............................................................................................................................. 8 Discovery, mapping and interpretation of relief types ................................................................... 8 Sten De Geer 1926 ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Sten Rudberg 1960 and 1970 ......................................................................................................................... 9 Christian Elvhage & Karna Lidmar-Bergström 1987 ............................................................................. 10 S. Rudberg 1988 ............................................................................................................................................... 12 The relation landform – rock type (1) .................................................................................................. 12 Rock structure and landscape (2) .......................................................................................................... 12 Erosion surfaces (4) .................................................................................................................................... 12 Climatic geomorphology (5) ................................................................................................................... 12 Glacial erosion (6) ...................................................................................................................................... 12 K. Lidmar-Bergström 1994, 1995 and 1996 ............................................................................................... 13 The sub-Cambrian peneplain and further relief classification ...................................................... 13 The importance of former covers in preserving relief ...................................................................... 13 Origin of “plains with residual hills” .................................................................................................... 15 K. Lidmar-Bergström 1999 ............................................................................................................................ 17 Relief differentiation, causes and implications ................................................................................... 17 The differential uplift of the Scandinavian mountains ................................................................... 18 Karin Ebert, Adrian M. Hall & Clas Hättestrand 2012a: Shaping of inselbergs ........................... 18 Stepped peneplains ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Observations and ideas on stepped peneplains in the classical international discussion .............. 18 Stepped peneplains and valleys in northern Sweden – a review .......................................................... 19 Walter Wråk 1908 ..................................................................................................................................... 19 John Frödin 1914 ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Gustav Braun 1935 ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Hans W. Ahlmann, Erik Laurell & Carl Mannerfeldt 1942 .......................................................... 20 S. Rudberg 1954 .......................................................................................................................................... 20 S. Rudberg 1970 .......................................................................................................................................... 21 K. Lidmar-Bergström 1994, 1996 ........................................................................................................... 21 K. Lidmar-Bergström, Jens-Ove Näslund, K. Ebert, Truls Neubeck & Johan M. Bonow 2007 ........................................................................................... 21 K. Ebert, C. Hättestrand, A. Hall & Göran Alm 2011 .................................................................... 22 Fluvial valleys and their implications ..................................................................................................... 22 Sven Norlindh 1924 ......................................................................................................................................... 22 S. Rudberg 1988 ................................................................................................................................................ 22 K. Lidmar-Bergström 1996 ............................................................................................................................ 25 Valley patterns ............................................................................................................................................. 25 Suggested river deflections ...................................................................................................................... 26 Relief and the effect of glacial erosion .................................................................................................. 27 Peneplains and glacial erosion ....................................................................................................................... 27 Valleys and glacial erosion .............................................................................................................................. 27 Glacial erosion in general ............................................................................................................................... 28 Discussion .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Relief development in relation to weathering in different climates and structure .......................... 31 Deep weathering – an important factor in relief formation even in a formerly glaciated area ........................................................................................ 31 Undulating hilly relief ............................................................................................................................. 31 Plains with residual hills (inselberg plains) ......................................................................................... 31 Relief preservation below remnant covers and its tectonic implications ........................................... 32 Significance and correlation of peneplains (stepped and re-exposed) ............................................... 33 Major peneplains: summary .................................................................................................................... 33 The faulted sub-Cambrian peneplain .................................................................................................. 33 Correlations of stepped peneplains in northern Lapland ................................................................ 33 Inclined or horizontal peneplain steps ................................................................................................ 34 Differential tectonic uplift and correlation of stepped peneplains ............................................... 34 Crosscutting relationships ....................................................................................................................... 35 Implications of valleys for conclusions on tectonics and glacial erosion ............................................ 35 Valleys and water gaps along the Bothnian coast in relation to tectonics constrained by the sub-Cambrian peneplain .......................................... 35 Influence of the glaciations on some water gaps ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Significance of Intact Forest Landscapes in The
    Landscape Ecol (2020) 35:2113–2131 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) RESEARCH ARTICLE Conservation significance of intact forest landscapes in the Scandinavian Mountains Green Belt Johan Svensson . Jakub W. Bubnicki . Bengt Gunnar Jonsson . Jon Andersson . Grzegorz Mikusin´ski Received: 6 July 2019 / Accepted: 1 August 2020 / Published online: 10 August 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Methods Over 22 million ha with 14.5 million ha Context As forest harvesting remains high, there is a boreal and subalpine forest and with data consisting of crucial need to assess the remaining large, contiguous a 60-70 year retrospective sequence, we analyzed and intact forests, regionally, nationally and globally. distribution, density and connectivity of forests that Objectives Our objective was to analyze the spatial have not been clear cut, using moving window and patterns and structural connectivity of intact and landscape analyzes derived from Circuitscape. primary forests in northern Sweden with focus on Results We revealed a contiguous, connected and the Scandinavian Mountain region; one of the few semi-connected intact forest landscape forming a remaining large European intact forest landscapes. distinct Green Belt south to north along the mountain range. Almost 60% of the forestland remains intact, including contiguous clusters 10,000 ha and larger. The connectivity is particularly high in protected areas Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01088-4) con- with primary forests outside contributing substantially tains supplementary material, which is available to authorized to overall connectivity. We found gaps in connectivity users.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland
    44 by David G. Gee1, Haakon Fossen2, Niels Henriksen3, and Anthony K. Higgins3 From the Early Paleozoic Platforms of Baltica and Laurentia to the Caledonide Orogen of Scandinavia and Greenland 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen Villavägen 16, Uppsala, SE-752 36, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 3 The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, Dk 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] The Caledonide Orogen in the Nordic countries is exposed in Norway, western Sweden, westernmost Fin- Introduction land, on Svalbard and in northeast Greenland. In the The Caledonide Orogen is preserved on both sides of the North mountains of western Scandinavia, the structure is dom- Atlantic Ocean, in the mountains of western Scandinavia and north- inated by E-vergent thrusts with allochthons derived eastern Greenland; it continues northwards from northern Norway, across the Barents Shelf and Svalbard to the edge of the Eurasian from the Baltoscandian platform and margin, from out- Basin (Figure 1). The orogen is notable for its thrust systems, board oceanic (Iapetus) terranes and with the highest E-vergent in Scandinavia and W-vergent in Greenland. The width of the orogen, prior to Cenozoic opening of the North Atlantic, was in thrust sheets having Laurentian affinities. The other the order of at least 700–800 km, the deformation fronts on both side of this bivergent orogen is well exposed in north- sides of the orogen being defined by thrusts that, in the Devonian, eastern Greenland, where W-vergent thrust sheets probably reached substantially further onto the foreland platforms than they do today.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Networks and Alliances
    THE CONTEMPORARY ART DAYS SUMMIT 2018 NETWORKS AND ALLIANCES samtidskonstdagarna.se/en 14–16 November 2018 Boden/Luleå 13 November Pre-summit visit to Kiruna The Contemporary Art Days is the annual contemporary art summit that brings together art professionals from across Sweden and other countries to discuss current issues for art organisations. In 2018, for the first time, the summit is organised under the aegis of the Public Art Agency Sweden. This year’s summit will focus on building networks and alliances as strate- gies for action in contemporary art organisations today. The last few years have witnessed a large increase in organisational networks across the art field in Sweden. Whether formal or informal, on a local or national scale, with Nordic or international counterparts, alliances are formed in a variety of constellations between art institutions, self-organised initiatives and other organisations. Are these networks signs of the signature strategy of the neoliberal working world? Or are they responses of mutual support and solidarity by small and mid-size art organisations in the changing political landscape and precarious economic conditions? Or are today’s networks merely new forms of age old tools for building assemblies around mutual concerns? The Contemporary Art Days 2018 presents a diverse programme comprising guest speakers, performances, site visits and workshops that will examine a variety of ways of working with networks and building strategic alliances. The summit is held in the region of Norrbotten in the north of Sweden. A preview of the 2018 Luleå Biennial is included in the programme, as well as a pre-summit site visit to Kiruna, a mining town that is being relocated and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Evidence on the Age of the Trysil Porphyries and Granites in Eastern Hedmark, Norway
    ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE ON THE AGE OF THE TRYSIL PORPHYRIES AND GRANITES IN EASTERN HEDMARK, NORWAY by H. N. A. Priem1), R. H. Verschure1), E. A. Th. Verdurmen1), E. H. Hebeda1) and N. A. I. M. Boelrijk1) Abstract. Rocks from the (sub-Jotnian) acidic plutonic and volcanic basement complexes in the Trysil area, eastern Hedmark, yield a Rb—Sr isochron age of 1 541 ±69 million years. This agrees within the limits of error with the isochrom age of 1590 ±65 million years determined for the Dala porphyries and granites in Dalarna, Sweden, which are the continuation of the acidic igneous complexes in the Trysil area. The sub-Jotnian acidic magmatism in the eastern Hedmark—Dalarna region can thus be dated at 1570 ± 40 million years ago, i.e. some 100 million years younger than the termination of the Svecofennian orogcny. (Ages computed with A. = 1.47 x 10"11 yr"1 ; errors with 95 % confidence level). Chemically, this magmatism is characterized by a granitic to alkali granitic and alkali syenitic composition. The Trysil area has also been affected by a tectonothermal event in Sveconorwegian time, about 925 million years ago, as evidenced by the Rb—Sr and K—Ar ages of separated biotites. Introduction. Studies on the geology of the Trysil area in eastern Hedmark have been published by Schiøtz (1903), Reusch (1914), Holmsen (1915), Holtedahl (1921), Dons (1960) and Holmsen et al. (1966). The Quaternary deposits were mapped by Holmsen (1958, 1960). A geo logical sketch map of the area is shown in Fig. 1 (mainly after the Geo logisk Kart over Norge, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Journal from the Luleå Biennial 0
    � Monthly journal from the Luleå Biennial 0:- Nr.1 “We Were Traitors of the Nation, They Said” Aug 2018 attack can be seen as the culmination of the preceding years of nationalism, warmongering and hatred against the communists in the re- gion. Its features and planning are remarkable: one of the key agents in the act, Ebbe Hallberg, was state attorney and chief of police in Luleå. Together with a journalist at the conservative newspaper Norrbottens-Kuriren and some army officers, they organised and carried out the bru- tal deed with the aim of silencing dissidents. We will also direct our attention to the history of the Swedish government’s establishment of internment camps for anti-fascists and anti-na- zis during the 1930s and 40s. The largest of the camps was located in the Norrbotten town Stors- ien in the Kalix municipality. Interned here were, among others, members of Flamman’s editorial staff. The camp and the attack overlap in time, 1 sentiment and the destinies they affected. 1 By addressing this dark history, we reflect on Swe- den’s idea of itself and its neutrality. How do these Monument by Toivo Lundmark, in memory of the attack events resonate today? What happens when we on Norrskensflamman. Photo: Thomas Hämén, 2018. look back and remember together? And why do these stories feel especially pertinent at this par- Between two private residences on Kungsgatan ticular time? These are questions we have raised 32 in the centre of Luleå is a memorial to the five in a research process that will lead us further to- people who fell victim to the attack on the com- wards the opening of the Luleå Biennial in Novem- munist newspaper Norrskensflamman on the 3rd ber 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosional Cycles in the Front Range of Colorado and Their Correlation 1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA W VOL. 36. PP. 498-512 SEPTEMBER 30. 1925 EROSIONAL CYCLES IN THE FRONT RANGE OF COLORADO AND THEIR CORRELATION 1 BY HOJIKR P. LITTLE (P resented in abstract before the Society December 29, J02J,1) CONTENTS Puice Introduction................................................. ......................................................................... 495 Peneplains of the Front Range................................................................................. 497 General statement...................................................................................................... 497 The Flattop peneplain............................................................................................... 498 The Rocky Mountain peneplain............................................................................. 500 The Park stage............................................................................................................. 504 The Fountain Creek stage....................................................................................... 507 The Canyon-cutting stage........................................................................................ 509 Age and correlation of erosion cycles..................................................... ............... 509 Discussion......................................................: ....................................................................... 510 Bibliography.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Excursions Travel Directions: from Jokkmokk, Drive Over the Porjus, Turn in Postgatan, Drive up the Hill for About E45 in the Direction of Porjus
    Njietjagårsså Parta falls A fantastic ra- The biggest waterfall in the beautiful ri- vine with a nice ver Pärlälven, with a surrounding of great waterfall, great natural beauty. Campfire place and toilet. nature and view. Travel directions: Drive over road 747 in the direc- Travel directions: tion of Karats, past the bridge over the river Pärlälven Follow the E45 from and Puortnak, pass the Norvibäcken stream to the Jokkmokk in the parking with an information sign on the left side of Görjeån direction of Porjus, the road. Follow the trail towards Partafallet for about turn right after 6 km in the direction of Messaure/ 3 km, there are signs along the trail. Nattavaara, drive 30 km. After the Messaure dam, turn left in the direction of Nattavaara. Drive 1,3 km Porjustallen – the old pine tree turn left on the Blåberg road. Drive about 200 metres of Porjus towards a road barrier that is closed most of the time. The old pine tree or Porjustallen, on the Even if the barrier is open, it could be closed while you are in the closed area, so it’s better to leave your top of the hill Porjusberget, is probably car here and walk for about 1,5 km. Take the first among the oldest pine trees in Sweden, exit to the left (marked with red and white), walk for perhaps 700-800 years old. It survived about 350 metre towards a sand pit and the end of forest fires and powerful storms during the road. Continue for about 150 metres following the trail that is marked with red and white.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAIL GUIDE: Stiehpaltjåhkkå Height 686 M.A.S.L
    TRAIL GUIDE: Height 686 m.a.s.l. WGS84 66°32’1.1”N 16°21’54.0”E SWEREF99 TM 7380056, 560651 Stiehpaltjåhkkå Stiehpaltjåhkkå is located just south of the Arctic circle. At the top you are rewarded with a sweeping view towards the Norwegian mountains, N the lake Sädvvájávrre and Ruonekjåhkkå flowing along the Smuolevágge valley. Directions: 102 km from Arjeplog, E95, going west. Just after a sign for Lillviken, Stiehpal, you can begin the hike from a parking bay. If you arrive from the west you start the hike just after the Arctic Circle, on the left-hand side. A sign marks the beginning of the trail. Height: 684 m.a.s.l. ARCTIC CIRCLE Distance to the top: 1.8 km. Hiking: Easy and intermediate. Recommended for children. The ascent is relatively steep for a stretch of around 200 m. Equipment: Boots/rubber boots recommended as parts are marshland. A map and compass might be useful. Bring water . – there is no stream along the path. Start Path: There are two older trails: one slightly better from Lillviken Grass-of-Parnassus and one beginning at Camp Polcirkeln, the latter is not included in Parnassia palustris the drawings on the map. View: A vast mountain landscape with the Smuolevágge valley to the east and in clear weather you can see the border mountains to the west. Shelter: None, but nearby you have Camp Polcirkeln with a shop, Vuoggatjålme with restaurant and cabins and Sandvikens Fjällgård 0 km 2,5 km 5 km 7,5 km 10 km with cabins and a shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Renberget Height: 628 M.A.S.L
    TRAIL GUIDE: Renberget Height: 628 m.a.s.l. WGS84 66°1’55.1”N 17°57’44.3”E SWEREF99 TM 7326645, 634240 Renberget is Arjeplog’s nearest low mountain. Nature: The hike to Renberget The view tells the story of the land with the great is mostly through coniferous N lakes. The cabin by the top makes the hike a forest with some birch trees, popular destination, also for skiers in winter. at the top reminiscent of mountain birch. Traces of Directions: The trail begins at the Djuptjärn jogging track in earlier logging operations Arjeplog town. After a couple of hundred metres it forks off the are seen throughout the area, illuminated bark track east towards Renbergsstugan cabin. but closer to the top there’s a Height: 628 m.a.s.l. feeling of natural forest. Distance to the top: From the cabin by Djuptjärn 3.8 km. On the ground vegetation is Hiking: Easy. The last 200 m before the top are somewhat steeper. dense with moss, lycophytes Recommended for children. and plenty of blueberries, Equipment: If the weather is dry you can hike it in trainers. Some crowberries, lingonberries and heather. In wetter parts you smaller depressions might be wet. Footbridges in places. Bring so- 0 km 5 km 10 km 15 km 20 km mething to drink as there is no stream. Unlike for the higher peaks can also find cloudberries. in Arjeplog municipality – where there are usually fewer mosquitoes and gnats – it might be a good idea to bring extra mosquito repellent to Renberget from the middle of June to the middle of August.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economical Geography of Swedish Norrland Author(S): Hans W:Son Ahlmann Source: Geografiska Annaler, Vol
    The Economical Geography of Swedish Norrland Author(s): Hans W:son Ahlmann Source: Geografiska Annaler, Vol. 3 (1921), pp. 97-164 Published by: Wiley on behalf of Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/519426 Accessed: 27-06-2016 10:05 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Geografiska Annaler This content downloaded from 137.99.31.134 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:05:39 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE ECONOMICAL GEOGRAPHY OF SWEDISH NORRLAND. BY HANS W:SON AHLMrANN. INTRODUCTION. T he position of Sweden can scarcely be called advantageous from the point of view of commercial geography. On its peninsula in the north-west cor- ner of Europe, and with its northern boundary abutting on the Polar world, it forms a backwater to the main stream of Continental communications. The southern boundary of Sweden lies in the same latitude as the boundary between Scotland and England, and as Labrador and British Columbia in America; while its northern boundary lies in the same latitude as the northern half of Greenland and the Arctic archipelago of America.
    [Show full text]