Spurious Correlation Between Economies and Scale: Model T Ford Revisited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spurious Correlation Between Economies and Scale: Model T Ford Revisited Annals of Business Administrative Science 13 (2014) 199–214 Available at www.gbrc.jp http://dx.doi.org/10.7880/abas.13.199 Online ISSN 1347-4456 Print ISSN 1347-4464 ©2014 Global Business Research Center Spurious Correlation between Economies and Scale: Model T Ford Revisited Koji YAMADAa) Abstract: It is common knowledge that expansion in the scale of production leads to economies of scale. A correlation between economies and scale does exist. However, the reality on the shop floor, in Japanese, “gemba,” in actual manufacturing is that productivity increases and that there is expansion of production volumes through “flow creation” for the entire production process. Previous studies demonstrated how flow creation has led to increased productivity and expansion of production volumes even in relation to the production system for the Model T Ford, which is considered as a typical example of a large range cost reduction (i.e., an increase in productivity that was achieved through mass production). For example, expansion of production volumes occurs simultaneously as productivity increases due to a succession of standardizations such as the standardization of components, production processes, and operations. That is, there is highly likely a spurious correlation between productivity and production volumes. Increased production does not guarantee increased productivity. In fact, that was the case with the Model T Ford. a) School of Business Administration, Senshu University, 2-1-1, Higashimita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, [email protected] A version of this paper was presented at the ABAS Conference 2014 Winter (Yamada, 2014) 199 Yamada Keywords: standardization, creating a production flow, economies of scale, mass production, spurious correlation, Model T Ford Introduction Economies of scale are not necessarily achieved because an organization becomes larger either within the internal or external boundaries of the firm. Economies of scale are not achieved even with expansion of the factory size through mass production or an increase in the size of the business through various corporate acquisitions and mergers, including those with other industry types (i.e., even if internal production is chosen rather than outsourcing) by increasing the standalone production volumes of relevant individuals, divisions, and businesses. Economies of scale are only achieved if there is coordination of the activities of the relevant individuals, divisions and businesses, and appropriate management of the overall flow of activities (Fujimoto, 2004; Miyazoe, 2006). Organizations can be viewed as systems operating through the interaction of various elements (Takahashi, 1995/2003/2006, 2014). A system is generally defined as a complex of interacting elements (von Bertalanffy, 1968). An organization is a concept that indicates linkages and relationships, and its main feature is the individual relations among elements. A feature of an overall organization is that it cannot be comprehended by summing the features of each individual element. Even in the case of organizations that have brought together similar elements, any difference in the method of interaction among elements leads to a difference in overall performance. The manner in which the elements of composition interact is the essence of the organization. Even in relation to manufacturing, it is more important to have 200 Spurious correlation between economies and scale overall optimization as a system than the optimization of individual elements of composition of the production system to achieve the objective, whether that is the expansion of production volumes or increased productivity. A basic issue when pursuing such overall optimization is the creation of relationships between elements, that is, the creation of flows for each process and division, as well as for the supply chain that includes external component manufacturers and distributors. The appropriate coordination of such flows allowed for major U.S. companies such as Standard Oil Company, US Steel, and Ford Motor Company, which emerged during the latter half of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century, to benefit from economies of scale through mass production. For example, what was merely a loose federation of the U.S. Standard Oil Alliance rationalized into a large-scale business in 1882 by unifying business operations with the formation of Standard Oil Trust. This trust made it possible to reorganize the production process through consolidation of the affiliated refineries simultaneously constructing new refineries. It also allowed for the coordination of the flow of raw materials and products through the production process for kerosene, and by managing the supply chain from the oil fields to the oil refineries and to the consumer. This rationalization led to the concentration of close to one-quarter production of global kerosene in the Trust’s three refineries. Each refinery was large with a mean daily production competence of 6,500 barrels, and the mean cost per unit was substantially lower than its competitors, which contributed greatly to the expansion of the Trust’s profits (Chandler, 1977). Nevertheless, the fixed costs of large-scale production facilities are high, and the size of refinery operations required high-level maintenance to reduce the mean cost per unit. Achieving economies of scale required not only the expansion of production competence. 201 Yamada The management of flows of raw materials, which passed through production and distribution processes, and products as well as trading volumes were all vital conditions. Creating a Production Flow A pioneering successful example of such a system in the assembly processing industry was the Ford system developed by Ford Motor Company (hereinafter, Ford). The Ford system is well known as a 20th century model of a mass production system. Production of the Model T Ford under this system commenced in 1908, and production rose to as high as 200,000 vehicles per year during the golden age of 1923, with a cumulative total production of 15 million cars when production ceased in 1927. The price of the Model T Ford also fell almost constantly in line with the increase in production volumes, from US$ 850 in 1908 to as low as US$ 290 by 1924 (Chandler, 1964). That is behind the general awareness of the legend of the Model T Ford being produced for 20 years “with no change to the T model” and with close to 15 million vehicles produced (Takahashi, 2013a). While there is also awareness that this model provided a typical successful example of large range cost reduction and lower pricing through the mass production of a single product. Nevertheless, the success of this Model T Ford was not that the large-scale production of this single product continued for a long time. Continuation of large-scale production of the same product does not lead to increased productivity (Takahashi,2013c). The large-scale production of the same product is not a simple matter. The Ford system was a revolutionary one that simultaneously achieved high productivity and mass production by facilitating the flow of production processes with system management as the linchpin. 202 Spurious correlation between economies and scale Automobile production systems comprise various activities such as the acquisition of raw materials, production of components, component assembly, and sale of finished vehicles. While the production of individual components use individual processes such as casting, heat treatment, forging, and machining. In addition, component assembly comprises the assembly of unit components and finished vehicle assembly line to install the unit components. The creation of a good flow is indispensable to facilitate the flow of goods in process and products between each of these processes. The creation of flows in the Ford system often brings to mind the moving assembling method using a conveyor. This production method of assembly that involves workers being still and the movement of goods to be processed along a conveyor was created by Ford, taking hints from the disassembly lines for processed meat companies in Chicago and Cincinnati. The improvements to this method of delivery, whether it is by conveyor or gravity slides, improved the layout of the production facilities while also facilitating the flow of the overall production process. In particular, the moving assembling method using the conveyor was a groundbreaking process innovation that greatly contributed to the synchronization of the operations for each process (Abernathy, 1978). Nevertheless, implementation of the moving assembling method independently does not increase productivity. Standardization is a vital prerequisite when creating flows. Interchangeability of Parts To utilize the features of the moving assembling method and synchronize the entire production process, the operation time for each operational process needs to be identical. This requires the subdivision of the operational processes as much as possible and attempts for standardization of operations. In addition, to make the 203 Yamada operation time identical, the uncertain and wasted time such as is required to modify components needs to be eliminated. The establishment of uniformity of quality and interchangeability of components is required to eliminate such wasteful operations. Furthermore, standardization of machine tools, jigs, fixtures, and gauges is necessary to manufacture such highly precise interchangeable components. The synchronization
Recommended publications
  • A Review of Assembly Line Changes for Lean Manufacturing
    IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) ISSN: 2278-1684, PP: 01-05 www.iosrjournals.org A Review of Assembly Line Changes for Lean Manufacturing Awasare Anant Dattatray 1, M.V.Kavade 2 1 (Mechanical Engineering Department, Rajarambapu institute of Technology India) 2(Head Mechanical Engineering Department, Rajarambapu institute of Technology, India) ABSTRACT: The orientation towards an efficient mass customization confronts most companies with two opposing requirements: While the applied mass production system should be able to produce a huge product variety, the cost must be kept low. Therefore assembly lines have to be planned in a much more flexible way. The more complex the product, the more extensive the product mix—the more difficult the task. Shorter product life cycles also complicate the situation. Due to the volatile nature of market, companies cannot afford to manufacture same type of product for long period of time and neither can maintain high inventory level; to tackle this problem we propose a Continuous improvement tools and techniques are introduced to address these issues, allowing the manufacturing of superior quality products with efficient processes. The Lean tools and techniques is one of them. Keywords - production planning, Mixed-model assembly line balancing, Just-in-time scheduling, Lean tools, Product life cycle I. INTRODUCTION Assembly is an important manufacturing process for cost effective product variety. Significant research has been done in the Design and operations of assembly systems in support of high product variety, but many opportunities exist for future research. Assembly is the capstone process for product realization where component parts and subassemblies are integrated together to form the final products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Revolution in America
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A SECTION 1 The Industrial TEKS 5B, 5D, 7A, 11A, 12C, 12D, 13A, Revolution in 13B, 14A, 14B, 27A, 27D, 28B What You Will Learn… America Main Ideas 1. The invention of new machines in Great Britain If YOU were there... led to the beginning of the You live in a small Pennsylvania town in the 1780s. Your father is a Industrial Revolution. 2. The development of new blacksmith, but you earn money for the family, too. You raise sheep machines and processes and spin their wool into yarn. Your sisters knit the yarn into warm brought the Industrial Revolu- tion to the United States. wool gloves and mittens. You sell your products to merchants in the 3. Despite a slow start in manu- city. But now you hear that someone has invented machines that facturing, the United States made rapid improvements can spin thread and make cloth. during the War of 1812. Would you still be able to earn the same amount The Big Idea of money for your family? Why? The Industrial Revolution trans- formed the way goods were produced in the United States. BUILDING BACKOU GR ND In the early 1700s making goods depend- ed on the hard work of humans and animals. It had been that way for Key Terms and People hundreds of years. Then new technology brought a change so radical Industrial Revolution, p. 385 that it is called a revolution. It began in Great Britain and soon spread to textiles, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Tools and Mass Production in the Armaments Boom: Germany and the United States, 1929–441 by CRISTIANO ANDREA RISTUCCIA and ADAM TOOZE*
    bs_bs_banner Economic History Review, 66, 4 (2013), pp. 953–974 Machine tools and mass production in the armaments boom: Germany and the United States, 1929–441 By CRISTIANO ANDREA RISTUCCIA and ADAM TOOZE* This article anatomizes the ‘productivity race’ between Nazi Germany and the US over the period from the Great Depression to the Second World War in the metal- working industry.We present novel data that allow us to account for both the quantity of installed machine tools and their technological type. Hitherto, comparison of productive technologies has been limited to case studies and well-worn narratives about US mass production and European-style flexible specialization. Our data show that the two countries in fact employed similar types of machines combined in different ratios. Furthermore, neither country was locked in a rigid technological paradigm. By 1945 Germany had converged on the US both in terms of capital- intensity and the specific technologies employed. Capital investment made a greater contribution to output growth in Germany, whereas US growth was capital-saving. Total factor productivity growth made a substantial contribution to the armaments boom in both countries. But it was US industry, spared the war’s most disruptive effects, that was in a position to take fullest advantage of the opportunities for wartime productivity growth. This adds a new element to familiar explanations for Germany’s rapid catch-up after 1945. earmament in the 1930s followed by the industrial effort for the Second RWorld War unleashed an unprecedented boom in worldwide metalworking production. Over the entire period from the early 1930s to the end of the Second World War, the combatants between them produced in excess of 600,000 military aircraft and many times that number of highly sophisticated aero- engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Assembly Line (PAL) for High Production Rates
    2015-01-2492 Panel Assembly Line (PAL) for High Production Rates Michael Assadi, Sean Hollowell, Joseph Elsholz Electroimpact Inc. Samuel Dobbs, Brian Stewart Boeing Co. Copyright © 2015 SAE International Abstract Developing the most advanced wing panel assembly line for very The final solution was a coherent, streamlined and efficient assembly high production rates required an innovative and integrated solution, line capable of very high aircraft production rates (Figure 1). relying on the latest technologies in the industry. Looking back at over five decades of commercial aircraft assembly, a clear and singular vision of a fully integrated solution was defined for the new panel production line. The execution was to be focused on co-developing the automation, tooling, material handling and facilities while limiting the number of parties involved. Using the latest technologies in all these areas also required a development plan, which included pre-qualification at all stages of the system development. Planning this large scale project included goals not only for the final solution but for the development and implementation stages as well. The results: Design/build philosophy reduced project time and the number of teams involved. This allowed for easier communication and extended development time well into the project. All design teams (machine, tooling, automation, controls) Figure 1 PAL, automation cell, Line 4, Position 1 (L4P1) collocated and worked together on integration during all stages of development and implementation for the highest Introduction level of integration. Innovative integration of the tooling and the automated equipment evolved throughout project with the teams At the conception of the Panel Assembly Line (PAL), goals targeted working as one group.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDLING and ASSEMBLY Technologysubject to Change Without Notice
    INDUSTRY GUIDE HANDLING AND ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGY EFFICIENT APPLICATIONS SOLUTIONS HANDLING AND ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGYSubject to change without notice TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 HANDLING AND ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGY | SICK 8019952/2016-05-13 Subject to change without notice TABLE OF CONTENTS Challenges Challenges in handling and assembly technology 4 Applications in focus The application graphics shown are not binding, they are no substitute for the need to seek expert technical advice. Small part assembly: Example of pre-assembly involving an optics module 6 Small part assembly: Example of pre-assembly involving a housing assembly 14 Small part assembly: Example of final assembly involving a sensor 28 Products Product overview 42 Special pages We simply detect any object 118 IO-Link 120 Software Tool Sopas 122 Smart Sensor Solutions 124 4Dpro 126 Expertise in machines safety 128 Safe control solutions 130 Safety controller Flexi Soft 132 Safe networking: Flexi Line 134 Safe sensor cascade: Flexi Loop 135 Safe motion monitoring 136 Encoder and Motor feedback systems 138 General information Company 140 Industries 142 SICK LifeTime Services 144 Versatile product range for industrial automation 146 Industrial communication and device integration 150 Services 155 8019952/2016-05-13 HANDLING AND ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGY | SICK 3 Subject to change without notice HANDLING AND ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGYSubject to change without notice CHALLENGES Challenges in handling and assembly technology Many industries such as automotive, electronics, metal, machine tools, and medical engineering can be identified as the driving force behind handling and assembly technology. They rely heavily on automated han- dling and assembly processes that in turn contribute to streamlining high quality and accuracy and improving productivity and PSDI times.
    [Show full text]
  • High Volume Automated Spar Assembly Line (SAL) 2017-01-2073 Published 09/19/2017
    High Volume Automated Spar Assembly Line (SAL) 2017-01-2073 Published 09/19/2017 Rick Calawa Electroimpact Inc. Gavin Smith Boeing Co CITATION: Calawa, R. and Smith, G., "High Volume Automated Spar Assembly Line (SAL)," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2073, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-2073. Copyright © 2017 SAE International Abstract build process and an exercise of the lean principles. As is typical, relatively good data was available from the automated equipment, but The decision to replace a successful automated production system at analyzing it showed that machine run time was only a fraction of the the heart of a high volume aircraft factory does not come easily. A point overall build time. Numerous manual interactions required frequent is reached when upgrades and retrofits are insufficient to meet machine stops. All maintenance required production stops or late increasing capacity demands and additional floor space is simply night and weekend work. Build times varied widely. unavailable. The goals of this project were to increase production volume, reduce floor space usage, improve the build process, and The wish list for a new spar production system was ambitious: smooth factory flow without disrupting today’s manufacturing. Two decades of lessons learned were leveraged along with advancements in • No large production disruptions. the aircraft assembly industry, modern machine control technologies, and maturing safety standards to justify the risk and expense of a • Increase production capacity. ground-up redesign. This paper will describe how an automated wing ◦ Create a single flow line and reduce buffer requirements by spar fastening system that has performed well for 20 years is analyzed matching the takt time of the wing lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Iot Integrated Assembly Line - a Conceptual Model Development for Car Toys Assembly Line
    Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, volume 173 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019) IoT Integrated Assembly Line - a conceptual model development for car toys assembly line I Kurniawan,1, S Awibowo,1 and A T Pratama1 1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Swiss German University, Alam Sutera, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia Keywords: Lean Manufacturing, Cloud Manufacturing (CMfg), Internet of Things (IoT) Abstract. Lean manufacturing is a common methodology widely used by manufacturers around the world. The keys in order to apply lean manufacturing are efficiency and continuous improvement. Efficiency can be achieved towards the utilization of technology between shopfloor and supporting business layers occurs in a system. One of the technologies that can be used is IoT (Internet of Things) and Cloud Manufacturing (CMfg) in specific. This paper contains the concept design of IoT technologies that will be applied in a car toys assembly line. Technology such as RFID, Sensors, and Android-based cloud services will be included in the assembly line system design. RFID and sensors are used to capture a number of components & subassembly parts that occur in the assembly line and the data captured will be forwarded to the ERP Systems. Android-based cloud services are used to monitor and control the systems especially for the shop floor area. Introduction Nowadays, all manufacturers around the world are trying to achieve efficiency as high as possible that being driven by global competition and the fast changing of market demand and needs. Efficiency becomes one of the most critical factors in order to reduce resources usage such as labours, materials, and machines which all leading to cost reduction and productivity increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated High Speed Assembly Machine Design
    AUTOMATED HIGH SPEED ASSEMBLY MACHINE DESIGN Murat Demirci Zheng Jeremy Li, PhD Graduate Student Associate Professor School of Engineering School of Engineering University of Bridgeport University of Bridgeport Abstract Recent years, automation is still important for industrial world and in the global economy. Because of the global competition, industries started to look for new technologies and designs in automation field. There is no more enough time, energy and material to catch people needs for industries in nowadays. Thus, automated systems are becoming more interesting and important. The potential benefits of automated systems are reducing the cost of product, labor and waste; increasing the production quality, repeatability, work safety. In this paper, I describe the design steps of an automated high speed machine which is assembling the parts of a pen, according to manufacturing and production specifications. In the design project, automated system perform different kinds of process in assembly line, such as cartridge loading, point fitting, ink filling, plug fitting, gas charging and cap installing and final sealing. Furthermore, as our goals in project, automated machine must be cheaper, easier to maintain and working at “high speed” repeatedly. Working on the design project, it was really good experience to solve major design problems and to understand of engineering technology limitations in today’s world. I concluded my paper with a description designing of an automated high speed system and its distinguished advantages. Introduction In current world, the population of humanity is increasing day by day. Simultaneously, people needs are increasing, as well. In order to catch this trend and to meet the people needs; design engineers created automated machines to produce more products in short times.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSACTION COST LIMITS to ECONOMIES of SCALE Cotton M
    DO RATE AND VOLUME MATTER? TRANSACTION COST LIMITS TO ECONOMIES OF SCALE Cotton M. Lindsay & Michael T. Maloney Department of Economics Clemson University In the traditional treatment, economies of scale are attributed to a hodgepodge of sources. A typical list might include Adam Smith's famous "division of labour," economies of large machines, the integration of processes, massed reserves, and standardization. The list can be partly systematized because, when considered in detail, these various economies are themselves the result of various other more basic and occasionally overlapping principles. For example, both economies of massed reserves and economies of standardi- zation are to a certain extent the product of the statistical “law of large numbers.” However, even this analysis fails to strike to the heart of the matter because the technological factors however described that reduce costs with scale do not in themselves imply that large firms can produce at lower cost than small firms. The possible presence of such technological scale economies does not give us adequate knowledge to predict the structure of industry. These forces of nature may combine to make it cheaper to get things done in big chunks. However, this potential will be economically important only in the presence of transactions costs. Firms can specialize their production processes and hire out the jobs that require large scale. Realistically all firms hire out some portion of the production process regard- less of their size. General Motors ships many of its automobiles by rail, but does not own a railroad for this purpose. Anaconda uses a great deal of fuel oil in its production of copper, but it does not own oil wells or refineries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Concepts the Cost Function
    (Largely) Review: Cost concepts The Cost Function • Cost function C(q): minimum cost of producing a given quantity q • C(q) = F + V C(q), where { Fixed costs F : cost incurred regardless of output amount. Avoidable vs. sunk: crucial for determining shut-down decisions for the firm. { Variable costs V C(q); vary with the amount produced. C(q) { Average cost AC(q) = q @C(q) { Marginal cost MC(q) = @q V C(q) F { AV C(q) = q ; AF C(q) = q ; AC(q) = AV C(q) + AF C(q). Example • C(q) = 125 + 5q + 5q2 • AC(q) = • MC(q) = • AF C(q) = 125=q • AV C(q) = 5 + 5q q AC(q) MC(q) 1 135 15 • 3 61.67 35 5 55 55 7 57.86 75 9 63.89 95 • AC rises if MC exceeds it, and falls if MC is below it. Implies that MC intersects AC at the minimum of AC. Short-run vs. long-run costs: • Short run: production technology given • Long run: can adapt production technology to market conditions • Long-run AC curve cannot exceed short-run AC curve: its the lower envelope Example: \The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market" (Adam Smith) • Division of labor requires high fixed costs (for example, assembly line requires high setup costs). • Firm adopts division of labor only when scale of production (market demand) is high enough. • Graph: Price-taking firm has \choice" between two production technologies. Opportunity cost The opportunity cost of a product is the value of the best forgone alternative use of the resources employed in making it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Revolution!!! ​Ɯ Ɯ​ 1750
    The Industrial Revolution!!! Ɯ Ɯ​ 1750 - Today ​ The Industrial Revolution was a period during which predominantly agricultural, rural societies in Europe and America became industrial and more people lived in cities. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, which began in Britain in the late 1700s, manufacturing** was often ​ ​ done in people’s homes, using hand tools or basic machines. Industrialization marked a shift to powered, special-purpose machinery, factories and mass production. The iron and textile industries, along with the development of the steam engine, played central roles in the Industrial Revolution, which also saw improved systems of transportation, communication and banking. While industrialization brought about an increased volume and variety of manufactured goods and an improved standard of living** for some, it also resulted in often ​ ​ grim employment and living conditions for the poor and working classes. Manufacturing = Making and producing things! Standard of living = How most people live their lives BRITAIN: BIRTHPLACE OF THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Before the advent of the Industrial Revolution, most people resided in small, rural communities where their daily existences revolved around farming. Life for the average person was difficult, as incomes were meager, and malnourishment and disease were common. People produced the bulk of their own food, clothing, furniture and tools. Most manufacturing was done in homes or small, rural shops, using hand tools or simple machines. A number of factors contributed to Britain’s role as the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution. For one, it had great deposits of coal and iron ore, which proved essential for industrialization. Additionally, Britain was a politically stable society, as well as the world’s leading colonial power, which meant its colonies could serve as a source for raw materials, as well as a marketplace for manufactured goods.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Assembly Line ?
    59 WHAT WAS THE ASSEMBLY LINE ? DAVID E. NYE INTRODUCTION Today, ”assembly line” immediately suggests Asian or Latin-American factories where poorly-paid workers make consumer goods for export to the West. For example, many US corporations shifted jobs to northern Mexico beginning in 1965 as part of the Border Industrialization Program. This process accelerated dramatically after January 1, 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) went into effect. It abolished tariffs and made re-importation of assembly line goods easy. By 2000, 1.2 million US jobs had been relocated to Mexico. Most of the Mexicans hired were semi-skilled women, preferred both for their manual dexterity and their willingness to accept low wages.1 Corporations built factories where environmental legislation was lax and unions were weak or non-existent. In such places, “the danger is that repression rather than innovation becomes a competitive advantage.”2 Yet if the assembly line of today is often part of a global production system for offshore, semi-skilled work, at its inception in 1913 the Americans saw the assembly line as the guarantor of high wages and domestic prosperity. This essay reviews the origins of the assembly line, what exactly it was as a technology, and how it was initially understood. In hindsight, it was less a beginning than a mid-point in long- term developments that are still underway. Historians frequently refer to the assembly line as an historical stage, in a sequence from Taylorism to Fordism to “post-Fordism,” with additional stages sometimes included such as “lexible production,” “lean production” and most recently “post- lean production.”3 As convenient as these historical stages once seemed, their proliferation suggests that the whole notion of a sequence was mistaken to begin with.
    [Show full text]