DOCSLIB.ORG

Collins H. Gravity`S Kiss.. the Detection of Gravitational Waves (MIT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collins H. Gravity`S Kiss.. the Detection of Gravitational Waves (MIT GRAVITY’S KISS GRAVITY’S KISS THE DETECTION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES HARRY COLLINS The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Adobe Garamond and Berthold Akzidenz Grotesk by The MIT Press. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Collins, H. M. (Harry M.), 1943- Title: Gravity’s kiss : the detection of gravitational waves / Harry Collins. Other titles: Detection of gravitational waves Description: Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016035193 | ISBN 9780262036184 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Gravitational waves--Research. | General relativity (Physics) Classification: LCC QC179 .C647 2017 | DDC 539.7/54--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016035193 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Osh and Elsa CONTENTS 1 The First Week: We Have Coherence 1 2 Reservations and Complications: Malicious Injections? 17 3 Half a Century of Gravitational Wave Detection 49 4 Weeks 2 and 3: The Freeze, Rumors 57 5 Week 4: The Box Is Opened 75 6 Week 5 to the End of October: Directness, Black Holes 87 7 November: Ripples, Belief, and Second Monday 113 8 November: Writing the Discovery Paper 131 9 December, Weeks 12–16: The Proof Regress, Relentless Professionalism, and the Third Event 173 10 January and February: The LVC-Wide Meetings and the Submission 195 11 The Last Ripples: From the Press Conferences to the American Physical Society and the Rest of the World 225 12 Changing Order: The Long Aha! 255 13 On the Nature of Science 289 14 The Book, the Author, the Community, and Expertise 313 Postscript: The Beginning of Gravitational Wave Astronomy 325 How the Book Was Written and Those Who Helped 343 Sociological and Philosophical Notes 349 Appendix 1: Procedure for Making a First Discovery 377 Appendix 2: First Draft of the Discovery Paper without Author List or Bibliography 383 Appendix 3: Rules for Author Lists 395 References 397 Index 403 vi Contents 1 THE FIRST WEEK We Have Coherence It is September 14, 2015, and I am in my study sitting on the sofa with my laptop on my knees—the way I spend most of my waking life these days, as I prefer to work from home. It’s evening and I am idly reading the subject lines of the dozens of emails that come in every day. The largest number come from the gravitational wave community, and I usually delete them without reading. I’ve been working with this community for over four decades now, longer than all the active gravitational wave scientists except one. Once every six months or so I might save a short string of these Chapter 1 emails in a folder, in case they turn out later to be of interest. I study how science is actually done in real time. One email catches my eye. The subject line is “Very interesting event on ER8.” It had come in around noon, British Summer Time. The email First eek says that the interesting event has been seen by the c B analysis “pipeline.” The abbreviation “cB ” stands for “coherent wave burst” and the “Burst Group,” which developed the pipeline and is tasked with finding bursts of gravitational waves without basing the search on preconceived wave- forms. The cB pipeline, then, has just detected something that looks like an interesting burst of waves. A pipeline is a mathematical/statistical procedure that is applied to the torrent of data that pours out of the inter- ferometric detectors; different groups operate different pipelines based on different principles—they may have more than one each—to monitor the data streams and automatically search for anything that looks like a gravi- tational wave signal. hen the machines are running smoothly there could be a few alerts per week. The email I have noticed is addressed primarily to the CBC Group but also to other groups. “CBC” stands for “compact binary coalescence.” This is the group tasked with analyzing gravitational wave signals that come from binary stars at the end of their lives—the signals emitted in the last mad second or so of“ inspiral,” when the pair of stars, as with a skater drawing in her arms, start to rotate faster and faster around each other until they merge into one heavier star. The theory says these systems will emit a burst of gravitational waves that, in the last moments of rotation, as the new star that is born out of the merger reverberates with cosmic passion, might be strong enough to have a chance of being sensed by the exquisite machines that humans have placed on Earth to catch them. These inspirals and mergers can be modeled, though the exact waveform depends on the mass of each component in the inspiral and the way they are spinning; there is an almost infinite number of possible combinations, and when the CBC pipeline, as opposed to the Bc pipeline, looks for a gravitational wave it looks for close similarity to one of the 250,000 possible models in its “template bank.” The template bank divides the indefinite world of potential into detectable actuality. Here is that first email, which comes from Marco Drago: Mon., Sept. 14, 2015, 11:56 (all times are British Summer Time until October 25, when they move to Greenwich Mean Time) Hi all, cWB has put on gracedb a very interesting event in the last hour. https://gracedb.ligo.org/events/view/G184098 This is the CED: https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~waveburst/online/ER8_LH _ONLINE/JOBS/112625/1126259540-1126259600/OUTPUT _CED/ced_1126259420_180_1126259540-1126259600 _slag0_lag0_1_job1/L1H1_1126259461.750_1126259461.750/ Qscan made by Andy: https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~lundgren/wdq/L1_1126259462.3910/ https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~lundgren/wdq/H1_1126259462.3910/ 2 Chapter 1 It is not flag as an hardware injection, as we understand after some fast investigation. Someone can confirm that is not an hardware injection? “GraceDB,” by the way, is the “Gravitational wave candidate database.” It is the web page that shows events of potential interest, and it mostly logs things automatically so long as it is triggered by the events extracted from the pipelines that surpass a certain threshold. But it logs a lot of events, none of which has ever turned out to be a genuine gravitational wave. To be reading these emails you need to be part of a select group, and to access theURL s you need a password, which, as far as I know, outside of the scientists, only I possess. The select group is known as the “LIGO–Virgo collaboration” or “LVC.” It is the group based around the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo. LIGO has two four-kilometer interferometers in the United States, while Virgo is a French–Italian collaboration with one three-kilometer interfer- ometer near Pisa (which was not online at the time of the putative signal). But there are 1,000 or more scientists involved located all over the world.1 I look at the websites and see certain traces that appear to be large and 1. Actually, about 1,250, but I’ll use the round figure of 1,000 throughout the text. The LIGO–Virgo collaboration contains within itself elements of competition. Virgo was originally an entirely independent operation intended to compete with the US effort but it has been less well funded and, as a multicountry consortium (initially Italy and France), has more organizational difficulties to overcome. Perhaps as a result of these problems its interferometer has always lagged behind LIGO in terms of sensitivity, and Virgo scientists will be very disappointed that they were not able to contribute to the first detection of gravitational waves. The British-German GEO600 was also first conceived as a competi- tive instrument, but it was relatively starved of funds and it soon became clear that its most important role would be to contribute technically toLIGO , which it has done very suc- cessfully. That said, the scientists from all groups have worked as a seamless and pretty well frictionless team when it comes to analyzing the meaning of the signal detected byLIGO and writing up the results. So they are a fairly solidaristic group when it comes to handling and presenting the data (with some residual rivalry between LIGO and Virgo that seemed to show itself occasionally in the Big Dog incident (see chapter 2) but is nowhere in evi- dence in respect of the event. hen it comes to building apparatus, they are much more independent and competitive. 3 First eek appear to coincide in time on the two great interferometric detectors—L1 and H1—located 2,000 miles apart in Louisiana and ashington State, L1 therefore being southeast of H1. But I’m not that excited, because stuff like this comes up all the time: the detectors are so sensitive that they are always jiggling about and creating false alarms. e’ve been waiting fifty years to see a gravitational wave and it is pretty unlikely that this is it. The next email, which comes twenty minutes later, though it again does not get me very excited, at least makes me think I probably will save this string of emails in its own folder. This email says: “this is a nice inspiral with Mchirp = 27 Mo.” The implication is that the analysis of the shape of the waveform—its relatively low frequency and “ringdown” profile—indi- cates that combined objects with a total mass of considerably more than 27 of our suns have been involved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interactional Expertise and Embodiment Harry Collins
    Interactional Expertise and Embodiment Harry Collins For Jorgen Sandberg, Linda Rouleau, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas (eds) 2016 Skillful Performance: Enacting Expertise, Competence, and Capabilities in Organizations: Perspectives on Process Organization Studies (P-PROS), volume 7, Oxford: Oxford University Press Abstract In Part 1 of this paper, I introduce the idea of interactional expertise while in Part 2, I focus on its implications for philosophical theories of the importance of the body in forming our conceptual world. I argue that the way philosophers have dealt with the body turns attention away from the most important questions and that we cannot answer these questions without making the notion of socialisation, and therefore interactional expertise, a central concept in our thinking. This makes language at least as important, and often more important than bodily practice in our understanding of the world. The notion of a disembodied socialised agent leads in the direction of interesting questions while the notion of an embodied but unsocialised human actor is unimaginable. Keywords Interactional Expertise, Language, Embodiment, Dreyfus Part I: Interactional Expertise The philosophical idea of interactional expertise first arose before the term was invented. This was in the mid-1990s, in the context of the discussion of the limitations of artificial intelligence (AI); the question was can machines without human-like bodies be intelligent?1 The first published appearance of the term ‘interactional expertise’ (IE) was in the ‘Third Wave’ paper by Collins and Evans, published in 2002 but this paper dealt with the concept ‘by-the-way’ while attempting to shift social scientists’ attention to expertise in general.
    [Show full text]
  • LIGO Detector and Hardware Introduction
    LIGO Detector and Hardware Introduction Virtual Open Data Workshop May 2020 LIGO-G2000795 Outline • Introduction 45W • Interferometry 40W 1.6kW 200kW Locking Optical cavities • Hardware • Noise Fundamental Technical • Commissioning/Observation Runs • Future Detector Plans • Bibliography Gravitational Waves • Metric tensor perturbation in GR = + 2 polarization in GR Scalar and other possible waves ℎ • Free falling masses • Change in laser propagation time • Phase difference in light ∝ ℎ • Interferometry detects phase difference ∝ ℎ • Astronomical Sources Modeling Modeled Unmodeled /Length Modeled vs Unmodeled Short Inspirals (BBH, Bursts Short vs Long BNS, BH/NS) (Supernova) Long Continuous Waves Stochastic Known vs Unknown (Pulsars) Background Sensitivity Estimate • Strain from single photon: = 10 2 • Need strain 10 � −10 ℎ ≅ • Shot noise SNR− 22 = 10 improvement,∝ � 10 photons At1 1002 Hz equivalent to power24 of 20 MW • • With 200 W of input laser power, 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW requires power gain of 100,000 Total optical gain in LIGO is ~50,000 Ignores other noise sources Gravitational Wave Detector Network GEO 600: Germany Virgo: Italy KAGRA: Japan Interferometry • Book by Peter Saulson • Michelson interferometer Fringe splitting • Fabry-Perot arms Cavity pole, = ⁄4ℱ • Pound-Drever-Hall locking 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW Match laser frequency to cavity length RF modulation with EOM • Feedback and controls Other LIGO Cavities • Mode cleaners Input and output 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW Single Gauss-Laguerre mode • Power recycling Output dark
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry Forced Asymmetry Direct Apprehension and Elective
    This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/86120/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Collins, Harold Maurice 2015. Symmetry, forced asymmetry, direct apprehension, and elective modernism. Journal of Critical Realism 13 (4) , pp. 411-421. 10.1179/1476743014Z.00000000036 file Publishers page: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1476743014Z.00000000036 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1476743014Z.00000000036> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders. Collins, Harold Maurice, 2014. Symmetry, forced asymmetry, direct apprehension, and elective modernism. Journal of Critical Realism 13 (4), pp. 411-421. DOI: 10.1179/1476743014Z.00000000036 Symmetry, Forced Asymmetry, Direct Apprehension and Elective Modernism Harry Collins Cardiff University, UK Crazily, Norris seems to think sociology is at war with philosophy; it is not. I respond to his hostile comments on the sociology of scientific knowledge, which was inspired by Wittgenstein, by explaining the need for symmetry in the explanation of scientific knowledge, methodological relativism, elective modernism and a number of other issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4 (2018), 386-407 DOI:10.17351/ests2018.228 Challenging Power, Constructing Boundaries, and Confronting Anxieties: Michael Kattirtzi Talks with Andrew Stirling MICHAEL KATTIRTZI1 UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH ANDREW STIRLING2 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Abstract In this interview, Andy Stirling talks to Michael Kattirtzi about what initially drew him to Science and Technology Studies, his account of the impact of the Science Wars on the field, and why it matters that STS researchers do not shy away from challenging incumbents. Through a series of thoughtful reflections on his encounters with STS researchers, Stirling arrives at the conclusion that we should not expect the field to reconcile tensions that are more deeply rooted in society. Nonetheless, he hopes that in the future STS researchers will be more open and admitting of a plurality of epistemic perspectives within the field and avoid overly constraining it––all the while as he continues to demonstrate the value of appreciating such epistemic pluralism to policy- makers and stakeholders. A reflection by Michael Kattirtzi follows the interview. Keywords interview; Andy Stirling; epistemic diversity; normative commitments; disciplines; reflexivity First Encounters MK Let’s start with your own involvement with Science and Technology Studies, and your own sort of background––I know you remember your time in Edinburgh fondly. AS It was a formative experience for me––one of the most galvanizing of my intellectual life. Actually also my personal life, because it was in the Science Studies Unit (SSU) that I met my partner, Topsy Jewell (who was studying science studies with zoology). But I only had a small exposure to the SSU compared to other people you’ll be interviewing, because I was just an undergraduate.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Physics Preprints from Arxiv Would Be Quite Unaware That a Paper in General Physics Has to Be Treated Differently to Papers in Other Categories
    1 The Ecology of Fringe Science and its Bearing on Policy Harry Collins, Andrew Bartlett and Luis Reyes-Galindo School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University1 emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Introduction Fringe science has been an important topic since the start of the revolution in the social studies of science that occurred in the early 1970s.2 As a softer-edged model of the sciences developed, fringe science was a ‘hard case’ on which to hammer out the idea that scientific truth was whatever came to count as scientific truth: scientific truth emerged from social closure. The job of those studying fringe science was to recapture the rationality of its proponents, showing how, in terms of the procedures of science, they could be right and the mainstream could be wrong and therefore the consensus position is formed by social agreement. One outcome of this way of thinking is that sociologists of science informed by the perspective outlined above find themselves short of argumentative resources for demarcating science from non-science. The distinction with traditional philosophy of science, which readily demarcates fringe subjects such as parapsychology by referring to their ‘irrationality’ or some such, is marked.3 For the sociologist of scientific knowledge, that kind of demarcation comprises 1 This paper is joint work by researchers supported by two grants: ESRC to Harry Collins, (RES/K006401/1) £277,184, What is scientific consensus for policy? Heartlands and hinterlands of physics (2014-2016); British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellowship to Luis Reyes-Galindo, (PF130024) £223,732, The social boundaries of scientific knowledge: a case study of 'green' Open Access (2013-2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Matters of Gravity
    MATTERS OF GRAVITY The newsletter of the Division of Gravitational Physics of the American Physical Society Number 49 June 2017 Contents DGRAV News: we hear that . , by David Garfinkle ..................... 3 DGRAV student travel grants, by Beverly Berger .............. 4 Research Briefs: The Discovery of GW170104, by Jenne Driggers and Salvatore Vitale ... 5 Obituary: Remembering Vishu, by Naresh Dadhich and Bala Iyer ........... 8 Remembering Cecile DeWitt-Morette, by Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ..... 13 arXiv:1706.06183v2 [gr-qc] 22 Jun 2017 Remembering Larry Shepley, by Richard Matzner and Mel Oakes ...... 15 Remembering Marcus Ansorg, by Bernd Br¨ugmannand Reinhard Meinel . 16 Conference Reports: EGM20, by Abhay Ashtekar ......................... 18 Editor David Garfinkle Department of Physics Oakland University Rochester, MI 48309 Phone: (248) 370-3411 Internet: garfinkl-at-oakland.edu WWW: http://www.oakland.edu/?id=10223&sid=249#garfinkle Associate Editor Greg Comer Department of Physics and Center for Fluids at All Scales, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 977-8432 Internet: comergl-at-slu.edu WWW: http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/physics/profs/comer.html ISSN: 1527-3431 DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the articles of this newsletter represent the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of APS. The articles in this newsletter are not peer reviewed. 1 Editorial The next newsletter is due December 2017. This and all subsequent issues will be available on the web at https://files.oakland.edu/users/garfinkl/web/mog/ All issues before number 28 are available at http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog Any ideas for topics that should be covered by the newsletter should be emailed to me, or Greg Comer, or the relevant correspondent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Gravitational Waves
    Review A Brief History of Gravitational Waves Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota 1, Salvador Galindo-Uribarri 1 and George F. Smoot 2,3,4,* 1 Department of Physics, National Institute for Nuclear Research, Km 36.5 Carretera Mexico-Toluca, Ocoyoacac, Mexico State C.P.52750, Mexico; [email protected] (J.L.C.-C.); [email protected] (S.G.-U.) 2 Helmut and Ana Pao Sohmen Professor at Large, Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, 999077 Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. 3 Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire APC-PCCP, Université Paris Diderot, 10 rue Alice Domon et Leonie Duquet 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France. 4 Department of Physics and LBNL, University of California; MS Bldg 50-5505 LBNL, 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+1-510-486-5505 Abstract: This review describes the discovery of gravitational waves. We recount the journey of predicting and finding those waves, since its beginning in the early twentieth century, their prediction by Einstein in 1916, theoretical and experimental blunders, efforts towards their detection, and finally the subsequent successful discovery. Keywords: gravitational waves; General Relativity; LIGO; Einstein; strong-field gravity; binary black holes 1. Introduction Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, published in November 1915, led to the prediction of the existence of gravitational waves that would be so faint and their interaction with matter so weak that Einstein himself wondered if they could ever be discovered. Even if they were detectable, Einstein also wondered if they would ever be useful enough for use in science.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophia Scientiæ, 17-3 | 2013, “Tacit and Explicit Knowledge: Harry Collins’S Framework” [Online], Online Since 01 October 2013, Connection on 15 January 2021
    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences 17-3 | 2013 Tacit and Explicit Knowledge: Harry Collins’s Framework Léna Soler, Sjoerd D. Zwart and Régis Catinaud (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/876 DOI: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.876 ISSN: 1775-4283 Publisher Éditions Kimé Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2013 ISBN: 978-2-84174-641-5 ISSN: 1281-2463 Electronic reference Léna Soler, Sjoerd D. Zwart and Régis Catinaud (dir.), Philosophia Scientiæ, 17-3 | 2013, “Tacit and Explicit Knowledge: Harry Collins’s Framework” [Online], Online since 01 October 2013, connection on 15 January 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/876; DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.876 This text was automatically generated on 15 January 2021. Tous droits réservés 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Introduction: Collins and Tacit Knowledge Léna Soler and Sjoerd D. Zwart Building an Antenna for Tacit Knowledge Harry Collins Tacit Knowledge and Realism and Constructivism in the Writings of Harry Collins Trevor Pinch At the Margins of Tacit Knowledge Michael Lynch Taking the Collective Out of Tacit Knowledge Stephen Turner Tacit Knowledge and Its Antonyms Tim Thornton Collins’s Taxonomy of Tacit Knowledge: Critical Analyses and Possible Extensions Léna Soler and Sjoerd D. Zwart Ships that Pass in the Night: Tacit Knowledge in Psychology and Sociology Harry Collins and Arthur Reber Refining the Tacit Harry Collins Varia Unix selon l’ordre des raisons : la philosophie de la pratique informatique Baptiste Mélès Introduction au rapport inédit de Helmholtz sur Mosso Alexandre Métraux Ein unveröffentlichter Bericht über verschiedene Arbeiten Angelo Mossos Hermann von Helmholtz Un rapport inédit sur divers travaux d’Angelo Mosso Hermann von Helmholtz Philosophia Scientiæ, 17-3 | 2013 2 Editorial Introduction: Collins and Tacit Knowledge Léna Soler and Sjoerd D.
    [Show full text]
  • Stefan W. Ballmer
    Stefan W. Ballmer Curriculum Vitae Department of Physics Phone: +1-315-443-3882 Syracuse University Cell: +1-315-278-1154 Syracuse, NY 13244 Fax: +1-315-443-9103 USA E-mail: [email protected] Citizenship: USA, Switzerland Web: thecollege.syr.edu/people/faculty/ballmer-stefan RECENT AND CURRENT POSITIONS Jun 2016 - Associate Professor of Physics present Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY May 2019 - Visiting Associate Professor of Physics Jun 2019 Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Japan May 2018 - Visiting Associate Professor of Physics Jun 2018 Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Japan May 2017 - Visiting Associate Professor of Physics Jun 2017 University of Tokyo, Japan Jun 2013 - Research leave at the LIGO Hanford Observatory Aug 2014 Commissioning the Advanced LIGO interferometer Aug 2010 - Assistant Professor of Physics May 2016 Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY Dec 2009 - NAOJ Visiting Researcher Aug 2010 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Sep 2009 - JSPS Postdoctoral Fellow (Gaikokujin Tokubetsu Kenkyuin) Nov 2009 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Jul 2006 - Robert A. Millikan Postdoctoral Fellow Aug 2009 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA EDUCATION Jun 2006 Ph.D. Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA Experimental Astrophysics, Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO). Apr 2000 Diploma (equivalent to Master of Science), Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Switzerland With honor, in Theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua R. Smith
    Joshua R. Smith The Nicholas and Lee Begovich Center for Gravitational-Wave Physics and Astronomy Department of Physics California State University Fullerton 800 N. State College Blvd. Fullerton, CA 92831 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (657)-278-3716 Web: https://physics.fullerton.edu/∼josmith/ Appointments 2016– Dan Black Director of Gravitational-Wave Physics and Astronomy 2018– Professor of Physics 2014–2018 Associate Professor of Physics 2010–2014 Assistant Professor of Physics California State University Fullerton (CSUF) 2007–2009 Postdoctoral Research Associate in Physics Syracuse University 2006–2007 Postdoctoral Fellow in Physics Albert Einstein Institute Hannover / EGO-Virgo Education 2002–2006 Ph.D. Physics (Dr. rer. nat.), Leibniz Universitat¨ Hannover • Advisor: Karsten Danzmann • Thesis: “Formulation of Instrument Noise Analysis Techniques and Their Use in the Commissioning of the Gravitational Wave Observatory GEO 600” 1998–2002 B.Sc. Physics, Syracuse University • Advisor: Peter Saulson • Thesis: “Thermal Noise Associated with Silicate Bonding” Leadership 2012– Director, The Nicholas and Lee Begovich Center for Gravitational-Wave Physics and Astron- omy, CSUF 2019– Co-I, Cosmic Explorer Project, Member, Cosmic Explorer Consortium 2016–2017 Member, Executive Committee, APS Far West Section 2011–2015 Chair, Detector Characterization Group, LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2011–2015 Member, Executive Committee, LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2008– Member, Council, LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2008–2010 Co-chair, Glitch Working
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of LIGO
    A Brief History of LIGO One hundred years ago, using his recently formulated general relativity theory, Albert Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves and described their properties. To Einstein these waves seemed too weak ever to be detected, even for the strongest sources that he could conceive. Over the subsequent decades, our improving knowledge of the universe (black holes, neutron stars, supernovae …) and the march of technology (lasers, computers, solid state electronics, low loss optics….) have changed that. In the 1960s, Joseph Weber at the University of Maryland pioneered the effort to build detectors for gravitational waves, using large cylinders of aluminum that vibrate in response to a passing wave, an approach which broke the ground for the field of gravitational-wave searches. LIGO’s approach, using laser interferometry to monitor the relative motion of freely hanging mirrors, was proposed as a theoretical concept form in 1962 by Michael Gertsenshtein and Vladislav Pustovoit in Moscow Russia, and independently several years later by Weber and by Rainer Weiss in America. In 1967, Weiss investigated a laser interferometer limited at some frequencies by quantum shot noise, and in 1972 he completed the invention of the interferometric gravitational wave detector by identifying all the fundamental noise sources that such a detector must face, and conceiving ways to deal with each of them, and by showing that — at least in principle — these ways could lead to detector sensitivities good enough to detect waves from astrophysical sources. Prototype interferometric gravitational wave detectors (“interferometers”) were built in the late 1960s by Robert Forward and colleagues at Hughes Research Laboratories (with mirrors mounted on a vibration isolated plate rather than free swinging), and in the 1970s (with free swinging mirrors between which light bounced many times) by Weiss at MIT, and then by Hans Billing and colleagues in Garching Germany, and then by Ronald Drever, James Hough and colleagues in Glasgow Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Map Biographies Contact Information Bibliography T080068-00-R
    Abstracts Map Biographies Contact Information Bibliography T080068-00-R Building 33 (Bridge): 201 – Workshop 012 – Caltech Quantum Optics Lab Building 48 (Lauritsen): 039 – LIGO Metrology Lab Building 49 (Synochtron) Thermal Noise Interferometer Building 69 (Off Map): LIGO 40 meter prototype Overview: Thursday 1:30 – 3:30 Overview of Ion Beam Sputtering of Optical Coatings Ramin Lalezari, Advanced Thin Films, Longmont CO 80501, USA An overview of Ion Beam Sputtering (IBS) will be presented. A brief discussion of the history of ion beam sputtering technology will be presented covering the early development of ion sources as propulsion engines for spacecraft and their evolution as deposition sources for optical thin films. The deposition process will be described and compared to other common methods of producing optical coatings. A discussion of the materials commonly sputtered with the IBS process and the film qualities will conclude the presentation. An Introduction to the Test Mass Mirror Coatings in Advanced LIGO Steve Penn, Hobart and William Smith Colleges I will present a brief overview of Advanced LIGO and how the goals of that detector establish the requirements of the mirror coatings. We will review the desired optical and mechanical characteristics, and then focus on the challenge of obtaining the low thermal noise threshold. Macroscopic Tests of Quantum Mechanics with Optical Coatings Markus Aspelmeyer, Austrian Academy of Sciences There is currently enormous progress towards achieving experimentally the quantum regime of massive mechanical systems. This regime offers fascinating perspectives from quantum-limited sensing applications to the generation of quantum superpositions of macroscopically distinct mechanical states (Schrödinger’s cat) that allow for tests of quantum theory in a hitherto unachievable parameter range.
    [Show full text]