DOCSLIB.ORG

Graz Conference Sout... (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Graz Conference Sout... (PDF) Konfer/Graz_Conference_SoutheastEurope.doc/19.4.2014 Proposal for a sociological Conference on the topic 2014: TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AFTER. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE SOCIETIES IN CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST EUROPE SINCE THE FALL OF THE IRON CURTAIN? Place & time: University of Graz, Austria, Thursday, September 18 – Saturday 20, 2014 Occasion and aim of the conference The downfall of the Iron Curtain in 1989 was a world-historical event. After half a century of Communism in Central East Europe, which also implied a deep-going break-up of former very close relationships between the countries and peoples of central and southeast Europe, the former state-socialist countries became western-style market economies and adopted democratic political constitutions. This was a revolutionary transition which in some cases implied heavy costs but which also opened up major new opportunities. The aim of this conference is to investigate the societal consequences which this transition had on both sides of the former Iron Curtain. For Austria and Italy, it implied that their eastern provinces turned from peripheral areas into central zones between west and east Europe; for its entrepreneurs and bankers huge investment opportunities opened up. For all former state socialist countries it implied a painful restructuring, for some of the successor states of Yugoslavia, in the first decade a terrible war. Over 100.000 war refugees were accepted in Austria, 60.000 of them remained here. But later on, in the wake of economic reforms and the access of many to the European Union, it led to an economic recovery, new opportunities for work in the west and a relative consolidation of the new political systems. Today, about half a million people born in former Yugoslavia are living in Austria - by far the largest group of immigrants from any country. Twenty-five years seem to be a period long enough to draw a balance about the achievements, but also about the negative concomitants of this processes, such as the emergence of new inequalities. Several Austrian sociologists have had scientific relations with sociologists in South and Eastern Europe already before 1989 and they have been very attentive about the events and their consequences since then. This applies particularly to sociologists in Graz which is located centrally in this area, very near to northwest Italy, Slovenia, Croatia and Hungary. In October 1987, the Austrian Sociological Association with Max Haller as president at that time organized its biannual meeting as an international conference at the University of Graz with title “Societies at Borders. Social Structure and Social Consciousness in East and West Europe.” It was 1 attended by hundreds of sociologists from neighbour countries, but also from west Europe. In June 1988, a symposium was held on the Polish-Austrian sociologist Ludwig Gumplowicz in Graz, coordinated by Gerald Angermann-Mozetic, with participants from Poland and Austria. Several members of the department of sociology gave visiting lectures at the universities of Maribor and Ljubljana; Max Haller and Helmut Kuzmics directed a common course with colleagues of the University of Ljubljana. In October 2012, the members of the sociological department of Graz visited the sister department of the University of Maribor. Recently, a Joint Study Master Programme „Cultural Sociology“ was established as a cooperation between the Universities of Graz, Brno, Trento and Zadar with Manfred Prisching and Katharina Scherke (Graz) and Mirko Petric (University of Zadar) as coordinators. The aim of the proposed conference is to renew and continue these efforts at cooperation. It has the following specific aims: - To deepen existing contacts and collaborations between sociologists in this macro-region; - to explore new possibilities for scientific exchanges and cooperation; - to take stock of significant social changes that have been going on since 1989; - to present new studies and findings from all areas of sociological research. Substantive topics of the programme Thus, the aim of the conference is to bring together as many sociologists of the countries concerned in a relatively informal way. It should be possible for all sociologists from this area to present examples from their ongoing research at the conference. Given the interdisciplinary character of many of the topics enumerated in the following, also representatives of other social scientific disciplines (in particular economists and political scientists) shall be invited. The concrete format of the conference shall be decided after the first round of Call for papers. It is also possible to organize sessions around one major lecture with a panel of discussants. Particularly welcome are papers (also short notes, PPT-presentations etc.) concerning the changes since 1989 and actual problems in the following areas: - Emergence of new socio-economic inequalities, - New middle classes – development and strains - Changes in patterns of family formation, marriage and fertility, - Changes in the situation of old people (problems of care, personnel for care etc.), - Women: labour market participation, educational and occupational opportunities, - Enterprises and markets in transition, - Changes in and problems of employment and unemployment, changes in work, 2 - Migration patterns (emigration, return and circular migration, commuting), - Political transformations and problems (development of party systems, voting turnout), - Rise of new right-wing movements and xenophobic attitudes, - The situation of ethnic minorities (Roma), immigrations and asylum seekers; - Repercussions of the war in former Yugoslavia. - Integration of immigrants from South-East Europe in Austria Organization Scientific Committee Prof. Max Haller, Coordinator (former head of department, president of the Austrian Sociological Association and vice President of the European Sociological Ass.) Prof. Stephan Moebius, Head of the Department of Sociology, University of Graz Prof. Gerald Angermann-Mozetic, coordinator of the Unit History and Theory of Sociology, Department of Sociology, University of Graz Prof. Manfred Prisching, Prof. Katharina Scherke (Graz), and Dr. Mirko Petric (Zadar), coordinators of the Joint Master Study Program “Cultural Sociology” Prof. Gerald Angermann-Mozetič, coordinator of the unit "Theory and History of Sociology", Department of Sociology, University of Graz Prof. Christian Fleck, founding director of the Archive for the History of Sociology in Austria Prof. Klaus Kraemer, head of unit Economic Sociology, University of Graz Prof. em. Paul Kellermann, former president of the Austrian Sociological Association Prof. Josef Langer, University of Klagenfurt, member of the International Conference “Enterprise in Transition” Prof. Helmut Staubmann (Innsbruck), President of the Austrian Sociological Association Prof. Rudolf Richter (Vienna; chair of the Local Organizing Committee for the World Sociological Forum, Vienna 2016) Prof. Hajdeja Iglič, Head of Sociology Department, University of Ljubljana Prof. Alberto Gasparini (Istituto di Sociologia Internazionale, Gorizia) Conference fees There are no conference fees. For the participants from former state socialist countries, who present papers, free accommodation will be provided. For doctoral students and young researchers without a full job, a support for travel costs should be possible. 3 Information and contact: Sabine List, Department of Sociology, University of Graz, Universitätsstr.15, A-8010 Graz: [email protected], Tel. (+43) (0)316 380 7080 (Paper proposals, administrative information) Max Haller: [email protected], Tel. (+43) (0)316 380 3541 (programme information) Deadline for announcement of papers and presentations: June 25, 2004 Please submit a short abstract (half a page) and a short biographical information (institutional affiliation, position, research areas, 2-3 publications). 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cómo Citar El Artículo Número Completo Más Información Del
    Sociológica (México) ISSN: 0187-0173 ISSN: 2007-8358 UAM, Unidad Azcapotzalco, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Alvear, Rafael La raíz antihumanista de la sociología: el caso de Ludwig Gumplowicz1 Sociológica (México), vol. 34, núm. 97, 2019, Mayo-Agosto, pp. 43-71 UAM, Unidad Azcapotzalco, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305062908002 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Sociológica, año 34, número 97, mayo-agosto de 2019, pp. 43-71 Fecha de recepción: 14/08/18. Fecha de aceptación: 29/07/19 La raíz antihumanista de la sociología: el caso de Ludwig Gumplowicz1 The Anti-humanist Roots of Sociology: The Case of Ludwig Gumplowicz Rafael Alvear* RESUMEN En parte importante de los enfoques sistémicos, postestructuralistas, e in- cluso críticos, se presume que la tradición sociológica habría estado atada a un principio humanista o antropocéntrico que explica parte de su déficit teórico contemporáneo. Sin embargo, ¿puede dicha tradición catalogarse tan sencillamente como humanista? Mediante un acercamiento a la obra de Ludwig Gumplowicz se propone indagar en un pilar olvidado de la tradición que refrenda las raíces críticas de la sociología frente al problema del huma- nismo. Dicho análisis procura atender tanto la dimensión epistémica como también el marco social disciplinar en el que la misma surge. El denominado antihumanismo de Gumplowicz –se sostiene a continuación– no sólo se afincaría en su posición teórico-conceptual, sino además en su incesante lucha disciplinar frente a la tradición filosófica.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020
    Federal Ministry Federal Ministry � Federal Ministry Republic ofof AustriaAustria Republic of Austria Republic ofof AustriaAustria EdEducation, ucation, Science Climate Action, Environment, EdDigital ucation, and Science andand ResearchResearch Energy, MobiIity, andEconomic Research Aff airs Innovation and Technology Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020 Report under Section 8(1) of the Research Organisation Act on federally subsidised research, technology, and innovation in Austria This report was commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF), the Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK), and the Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW). It was written by a working group consisting of WPZ Research, the Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI) and the Austrian Institute for SME Research (KMU Forschung Austria) with the support of VDI/VDE Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit), Technopolis and the Industry Science Institute (IWI). Team of authors: Brigitte Ecker (Coordination, WPZ Research), Philipp Brunner (IWI), Tobias Dudenbostel (Technopolis), Helmut Gassler (ZSI), Gerald Gogola (WPZ Research), Ernst A. Hartmann (iit), Joachim Kaufmann (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Peter Kaufmann (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Stefan Krabel (iit), Elisabeth Nindl (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Sascha Ruhland (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Sascha Sardadvar (WPZ Research), Christine Seth (iit), Herwig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology in Continental Europe After WWII1
    Sociology in Continental Europe after WWII1 Matthias Duller & Christian Fleck Continental particularities Sociology was invented in Europe. For several reasons, however, it did not bloom there for the first one-and-a-half centuries. The inventor of sociology, Auguste Comte, was an independent scholar with no affiliation to any institution. Likewise, other European founding fathers, such as Alexis Tocqueville, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels, were not professors, nor were they paid for their scholarly service by the state. Looking at the history of sociology in continental Europe, we do not come upon a striking role model of a “professional sociologist.” What is normally called the classical period ranges from pre-Comtean authors down to the generation after Comte (born 1798): Among the most prominent figures, from Ludwig Gumplowicz (1838), Vilfredo Pareto (1848), Tomáš Masaryk (1850), Maksim Kovalevsky (1851), Ferdinand Tönnies (1855), Georg Simmel (1858), Émile Durkheim (1858), Max Weber (1864), Marcel Mauss (1872), Roberto Michels (1876), Maurice Halbwachs (1977) to Florian Znaniecki (1882), only the Frenchmen and the exiled Pole occupied positions whose descriptions covered sociology and nothing other than sociology. All the others earned their living by practicing different professions or teaching other disciplines. For a very long time sociology failed to appear as a distinct entity in Continental Europe’s academic world. Simply put, one could not study it (even in Durkheim’s France a specialized undergraduate programme, licence de sociologie, started not earlier than 1958, before that students got an multidisciplinary training in the Facultés de Lettres or specialized institutions as the Vth Section of the École pratique des hautes études or the College des France).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Conflict
    Social conflict Michel Wieviorka l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France abstract Numerous approaches in the social sciences either refuse to consider or minimize the impor - tance of conflict in community, or else replace it with a Spencerian vision of the social struggle. Between these two extremes there is considerable space for us to consider conflict as a relationship; this is what differentiates it from modes of behaviour involving war and rupture. Sociology suggests different ways of differentiating various modes of social conflict. The question is not only theoretical. It is also empirical and historical: have we not moved, in a certain number of countries at least, from the industrial era dom - inated by a structural social conflict in which the working-class movement confronted the masters of labour, to a new era dominated by other types of conflict with distinctly more cultural orientations? Whatever the type of analysis, the very concept of conflict must be clearly distinguished from that of crisis, even if materially the two coexist in social reality. keywords action ◆ class struggle ◆ crisis ◆ social conflict ◆ social movements ◆ violence Is social conflict central to social life? Numerous approaches in the social sciences consider does Ludwig Gumplowicz (1883), who spoke of the that society constitutes an entity or a whole and ‘struggle of the races’. emphasize its political unity, which may often be rep - By refusing to adopt either of these two types of resented by the state, and its cultural and historical vision, at least in their most extreme versions, by unity, to which the idea of nation frequently refers.
    [Show full text]
  • In Austria: Progress Toward a Professional Model Or Status Quo?
    c e p s Journal | Vol.2 | No4 | Year 2012 91 The “New Doctorate” in Austria: Progress toward a Professional Model or Status Quo? Hans Pechar,*1 Gülay Ates2 and Lesley Andres3 • Until recently, both policy direction and public awareness of the Bologna Pro- cess has been focused almost unilaterally on the introduction of the Bachelor’s degree to European universities. This is understandable, as for most European countries, the Bachelor is a new academic degree. However, commencing with the Berlin Ministerial Conference (Realising the European Higher Education Area, 2003), reform of doctoral studies has been highlighted as a second equal pillar in the Bologna reform process. In this paper, we begin by providing an overview of the general policy background and the rationales that under- lie the attempts to restructure doctoral studies in Europe. Next, we focus on the specific situation in Austria, where peculiarities of the status quo collide with uniquely Austrian approaches to reforming doctoral education. Finally, through two case studies, we examine initial attempts – and related challenges – to implement the “New Doctorate” in Austria. Keywords: Bologna reform, doctoral studies, professional model, ap- prenticeship model, Austria 1 *Corresponding author. Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies (IFF), Vienna Location, Institute of Science Communication & Higher Education Research, University of Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] 2 Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies (IFF), Vienna Location, Institute of Science Communication & Higher Education Research, University of Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] 3 Department of Educational Studies, University of British Columbia, Canada [email protected] 92 the “new doctorate” in austria »Novi doktorat« v Avstriji: razvoj v smeri profesionalnega modela ali status quo? Hans Pechar,* Gülay Ates in Lesley Andres • Do pred kratkim so bili politične usmeritve bolonjskega procesa in seznanjanje javnosti o njem skoraj enoznačno osredinjeni na vpeljavo prve stopnje študija (Bachelor) na evropske univerze.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Sociology 2E
    1 This is an excerpt from the text listed below: Introduction to Sociology 2e Collection edited by: OpenStax ­ Content authors: OpenStax and Openstax College Sociology 2e ­ Based on: Introduction to Sociology <http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11407/1.7>. ­ Online: <http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11762/1.6> ­ This selection and arrangement of content as a collection is copyrighted by Rice University. ­ Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ­ Collection structure revised: 2016/01/20 ­ PDF Generated: 2016/05/18 16:15:08 ­ For copyright and attribution information for the modules contained in this collection, see the "Attributions" ­ section at the end of the collection. ­ 10 Chapter 1 | An Introduction to Sociology Making Connections: Sociology in the Real World Individual-Society Connections When sociologist Nathan Kierns spoke to his friend Ashley (a pseudonym) about the move she and her partner had made from an urban center to a small Midwestern town, he was curious about how the social pressures placed on a lesbian couple differed from one community to the other. Ashley said that in the city they had been accustomed to getting looks and hearing comments when she and her partner walked hand in hand. Otherwise, she felt that they were at least being tolerated. There had been little to no outright discrimination. Things changed when they moved to the small town for her partner’s job. For the first time, Ashley found herself experiencing direct discrimination because of her sexual orientation. Some of it was particularly hurtful. Landlords would not rent to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Bachelor's Degree
    27.08.2019 Admission Information Master’s Degree Programme in Media and Convergence Management (University of Klagenfurt) Degree programme code UL 066 150 Preface In accordance with § 64 (3) of the Universities Act, the admission to a Master’s programme is contingent upon the successful completion of a relevant Bachelor's programme, or University of Applied Sciences Bachelor's programme, or other equivalent programme at a recognized domestic or foreign post-secondary educational institution. Where equivalence has been established in principle and only certain supplementary qualifications are required for full equivalence, the Rectorate shall be entitled to tie the determination of equivalence to examinations to be taken during the respective Master’s programme. Definition of “relevant The Master’s degree programme in Media and Convergence Bachelor’s programme” Management is an English language degree with a special admission procedure. The Regulation on the Admission Procedure can be accessed by following this link: https://www.aau.at/en/study/studying-at-aau/applying/entrance- examination/master-mcm/#toggle-id-5 In addition to a completed Bachelor’s degree, applicants must provide proof of English proficiency at level C1 of the European Framework of Reference for Languages. Examples of relevant degree programmes include the following Bachelor’s programmes at the University of Klagenfurt: Media and Communications Science, Applied Informatics, Applied Business Administration, Business and Law, and Information Management. In the event of the successful completion of a different relevant Bachelor’s programme or University of Applied Sciences Bachelor's programme in the field of economics or law, it is also possible to gain admittance to this Master’s degree programme.
    [Show full text]
  • La Raíz Antihumanista De La Sociología: El Caso De Ludwig Gumplowicz1 the Anti-Humanist Roots of Sociology: the Case of Ludwig Gumplowicz
    Sociológica, año 34, número 97, mayo-agosto de 2019, pp. 43-71 Fecha de recepción: 14/08/18. Fecha de aceptación: 29/07/19 La raíz antihumanista de la sociología: el caso de Ludwig Gumplowicz1 The Anti-humanist Roots of Sociology: The Case of Ludwig Gumplowicz Rafael Alvear* RESUMEN En parte importante de los enfoques sistémicos, postestructuralistas, e in- cluso críticos, se presume que la tradición sociológica habría estado atada a un principio humanista o antropocéntrico que explica parte de su déficit teórico contemporáneo. Sin embargo, ¿puede dicha tradición catalogarse tan sencillamente como humanista? Mediante un acercamiento a la obra de Ludwig Gumplowicz se propone indagar en un pilar olvidado de la tradición que refrenda las raíces críticas de la sociología frente al problema del huma- nismo. Dicho análisis procura atender tanto la dimensión epistémica como también el marco social disciplinar en el que la misma surge. El denominado antihumanismo de Gumplowicz –se sostiene a continuación– no sólo se afincaría en su posición teórico-conceptual, sino además en su incesante lucha disciplinar frente a la tradición filosófica. PALABRAS CLAVE: sociología clásica, humanismo, antihumanismo episté- mico, cientificidad, filosofía. 1 El artículo que se presenta procura expandir la discusión que he intentado desa- rrollar en La sociología clásica y el destierro del ser humano y en Die Stellung des Menschen in der zeitgenössischen Soziologie. Umrisse zu einer soziologischen Anthropologie, con el objetivo de escarbar en pilares resueltamente olvidados de la sociología clásica. La preparación de este manuscrito se enmarca en el proyec- to Fondecyt de Posdoctorado de Conicyt (folio no. 3190389). Agradezco a Pablo Beytía y Óscar Alvear por sus comentarios y críticas a lo aquí expuesto.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Flyer
    ADAPTATION GOVERNANCE: SPATIAL, TEMPORAL AND CULTURAL CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES JUNE 26 –JULY 5, 2013 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY Co-organised with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt and co-operating with EC Tempus project "EnGo – Environmental Governance for Environmental Curricula" and the International Institute for Sustainable Development. This summer school is endorsed by the Global Earth System Governance project in cooperation with the Global Land Project. Course Directors: Ruben Mnatsakanian, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, CEU, Budapest, Hungary Anton Shkaruba, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, CEU, Budapest, Hungary Ruben Zondervan, Earth System Governance Project/ Lund University (Sweden) Additional Faculty: Sybille van den Hove, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technologies (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona / MEDIAN SCP, Barcelona, Spain; Maria Falaleeva, Coastal and Marine Resources Centre, University College, Cork, Ireland; Matthijs Hisschemöller, Department of Environmental Policy Analysis, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands Hans-Peter Nachtnebel, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria; László Pintér, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, CEU, Budapest, Hungary Peter Verburg, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Verena Winiwarter, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Klagenfurt, Vienna, Austria; At a time of well-documented, unavoidable and continuing global change adaptation has become a key concept in environmental and related social sciences, and also in policy processes on a variety of scales. Many sectors, such as forestry, biodiversity conservation, water management, agriculture, infrastructure development need information about the current state and future direction of ecosystem conditions, potential ecosystem-based adaptations, and relevant policies and governance mechanisms enabling such adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Historicism and Historiosophy in Ludwig Gumplowicz's Early Writings
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS WRATISLAVIENSIS No 3503 Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 34, nr 2 Wrocław 2012 DAVIDE ARTICO University of Wrocław Historicism and historiosophy in Ludwig Gumplowicz’s early writings. Gumplowicz between Gobineau and Schönerer A necessary (though not sufficient) condition to discuss Gumplowicz as a historian is to overcome confusion over his alleged social Darwinism. The main argument arises, of course, from his Rassenkampf, magnum opus published in 1883 and often considered a work to be placed between Arthur de Gobi- neau’s ideological racism, and programmatic anti-Semitism in the mainframe of the German nationalist movement promoted in Austria by Georg Heinrich von Schönerer at the turn of the twentieth century. Starting from the latter, it must be underlined that any allegation of anti- Semitism on Gumplowicz’s side can only be considered as a paradox. As dem- onstrated by Czesław Lechicki, among others, Gumplowicz not only had clear Jewish origins which, in spite of its many vicissitudes, he never denied, but he was also probably forced to abandon his native Kraków precisely because of the anti-Semitic attitudes of the Polish elites of the time, which translated into a heated ostracism against him.1 This biographical feature of Gumplowicz clearly puts him in opposition to Schönerer’s pan-Germanism, according to which Jews were allegedly “pigs,” and not because of their religion, but because of “blood.”2 Besides, a whole series of anticlerical and libertarian beliefs contributed to the marginalisation of Gumplowicz regardless of his Jewish origins.3 One might even assume, when comparing Gumplowicz’s experience to the biographies of other Jewish intel- lectuals of the period, that the ostracism by Polish conservative circles was 1 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Laissez Faire Leadership: Doing Nothing and Its Destructive Effects
    EJM, Volume 14, Number 1, 2014 ISSN: 1555·4015 I EJM I ~uroptan Journal of _anagtmtnt Europe .", .......0. ~.l_ ..... i a ~q,e,'\'~;~Po~ Universitatea F It f B . Supported by: i. .. 9.'" c,"; acu y 0 usmess ?··••'s.O\/~ BABE$-BOLYAI Cluj·Napoca, Romania Managing Editors Dr. Marius Gavriletea Dr. Cheick Wague, Dean Babes·Bolyai University, Cluj·Napoca, Romania South Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden www.tbs.ubbcluj.ro www.sh.se A Publication of the International Academy of Business and Economics® Promoting Global Competitiveness ™ •IABE.EU EJM, Volume 14, Number 1,2014 ISSN: 1555·4015 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENTTM Managing Editors: Dr. Marius Dan Gavriletea Dr. Cheick Wague, Dean Babes Bolyai University, Romania South Stockholm University, Sweden A Publication of the International Academy of Business and Economics® www.lABE.eu I TABLE OF CONTENTS I European Journal of Management Volume 14, Number 1, 2014 ISSN: 1555-4015 INCREASING DATA WAREHOUSING SUCCESS RATES A TALE OF TWO COMPANIES 7 Malini Krishnamurthi, California State University, Fullerton, California. U.S.A. INDICATING THE MOST INFLUENTIAL MANUFACTURING 13 FLEXIBILITY TYPES IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH Gottfried Seebacher, Alpen-Adria University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, AUSTRIA Herwig Winkler, Alpen-Adria University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, AUSTRIA EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL 23 INTERFACE PROBLEMS ON FIRM PERFORMANCE Herwig Winkler, Alpen-Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt, AUSTRIA Sabine Allmayer, Alpen-Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt, AUSTRIA ANIMAL ACCOUNTING:
    [Show full text]
  • RIO COUNTRY REPORT 2015: Austria
    RIO COUNTRY REPORT 2015: Austria Klaus Schuch Robert Gampfer 2016 EUR 27874 EN This publication is a Science for Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. This publication, or any statements expressed therein, do not imply nor prejudge policy positions of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Contact information Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954488318 Fax: +34 954488300 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC101166 EUR 27874 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-57809-0 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2791/432438 LF-NA-27874-EN-N © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. How to cite: Klaus Schuch, Robert Gampfer; RIO Country Report 2015: Austria; EUR 27874 EN; doi:10.2791/432438 All images © European Union 2016 except for the ERA Dashboard image on the first page by Niels Meyer licensed under CC BY 2.0 Abstract The 2015 series of RIO Country Reports analyse and assess the policy and the national research and innovation system developments in relation to national policy priorities and the EU policy agenda with special focus on ERA and Innovation Union. The executive summaries of these reports put forward the main challenges of the research and innovation systems.
    [Show full text]