Pratt River Valley Now in Alpine Lakes Wilderness

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pratt River Valley Now in Alpine Lakes Wilderness The Newsletter of the Alpine Lakes Protection Society (ALPS) 2015 Issue No. 1 Rick McGuire Pratt River valley now in Alpine Lakes Wilderness By Rick McGuire and Donald Parks Also in this issue: After over forty years of work because of difficult politics in the by the Alpine Lakes Protection US Senate. Low power hydro project threatens North Fork Snoqualmie ................... 4 Society (ALPS), the Sierra Club Background and Early History Helicopter operations threaten and several other conservation thru 1976 Alpine Lake Wilderness ................... 5 organizations, the Pratt River Yakima Plan update ............................. 6 valley and nearby areas are now The road to permanent protection for the low elevation State could expand motorized use protected within the Alpine in the Teanaway ................................. 7 Pratt valley, the center-piece of Lakes Wilderness. Parts of the Greenway National Heritage Area Middle Fork Snoqualmie and this legislation, has been long and Bill re-introduced ............................... 8 Pratt were also designated as twisting. The Pratt valley suffered Hansen Creek Vegetation Project Wild and Scenic Rivers. Our bill from a checkerboard pattern of Snoqualmie Ranger Districat .......... 9 was included in the catch-all alternating federal and private ALPS and other groups file lawsuit “National Defense Authorization ownership resulting from the 1864 to stop ATV routes on Okanogan- Act (NDAA),” and signed into Northern Pacific Land Grant. The Wenatchee National Forest .............10 law on December 19, 2014. This railroad subsequently sold its North Fork Skykomish road costs keep soaring .......................................11 unusual vehicle was used to lands in the Pratt and many other ALPS obtains tax-exempt status ......11 package our bill and a number parts of the Cascades New diversions & dams in Alpine of other lands and waters bills Continued on page 2 ALPINE Lakes Wilderness? ........................... 12 1 Pratt River valley now in developed a larger single- protect a number of unroaded unit Wilderness proposal that areas, including many that were Alpine Lakes Wilderness encompassed 374,342 acres. But contiguous to the designated Continued from page 1 many important places were Wilderness, many other areas were to Weyerhaeuser. Its subsidiary left out, so conservationists not protected, including the Pratt North Bend Timber Company worked out their own proposal. which was left vulnerable. logged lands in the lower and By 1974 ALPS and a coalition of The 1976 Legislation did middle Pratt, both private and conservation groups had proposed however set in motion a major National Forest sections, from the a 565,000 acre Wilderness effort to adjust the ownership 1920s through 1941. including more checkerboard pattern in the region, resulting in land and more forests than the an Alpine Lakes Land Exchange Early railroad-based logging Forest Service had proposed. was not very thorough, and much that was formalized in 1979 and This proposal by conservationists took several years to carry out. old growth survived. Low wood included the entire Pratt River prices during the Depression years Weyerhaeuser took advantage of and much of the Middle Fork the situation and exchanged out meant that only the best trees Snoqualmie area. were worth the effort to cut and of a number of significant areas haul out. Thus many areas were But when Congress finished including all of its holdings in the simply bypassed. Logged areas drawing final boundaries for the Pratt River Valley. were never artificially replanted, Wilderness in 1976, encompassing With the Pratt now entirely and have now grown back nicely 393,400 acres, the Pratt valley in federal ownership and Alpine into diverse, naturally regenerated, was not included. This was Lakes Area planning completed, mature second growth forest, because this forest was considered the Forest Service unveiled plans with many trees now more than 3 “high quality timberland”; it in 1987 for several massive timber feet in diameter and 150 feet tall. was in checkerboard ownership sales in the erstwhile North Bend The Pratt valley and much of the requiring additional funding for Ranger District that included Middle Fork are well on their way the legislation; and it had been the Pratt Valley. A major USFS to becoming old growth, “ancient cut only 30-40 years previously. sponsored field trip was held in forest” again. Although perhaps ALPS and its allies tried to include the Pratt in the late summer of not literally true, local legend has as much forest in the Wilderness 1987. ALPS swung into action, it that scrap iron from rails torn up as possible, but the politics of the forming a Pratt River-Middle after the Pratt logging went toward day were heavily influenced by the Fork Steering Committee, and building Admiral Yamamoto’s Kido timber industry, thus much low mobilizing widespread opposition Butai (mobile striking force) that elevation forest was excluded. to the new cutting plans. Then- attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, Defending the Pratt 1977–2006 Congressman John Miller bringing America into World War introduced a bill to designate the Conservationists viewed II. Pratt as a Wild & Scenic river. the 1976 bill as a start toward Although it did not pass, broad Conservationist interest in this protecting the region, not the area started at least 50 years ago public opposition to roading and end. The recent legislation takes logging the Pratt eventually caused when a 334,000-acre Wilderness a big step toward finishing the proposal was developed to the Forest Service to back away job started in the 1970s. ALPS has from the plan. The Forest Service replace the Alpine Lakes Limited worked steadily to protect the Area that was established by the ended up with much more than forests surrounding the Wilderness it bargained for from its Pratt Forest Service in 1946. The North ever since it was established, Cascades Study of 1965, a joint sale proposal. After the sale was advocating for administrative stopped, Pratt defenders came to National Park Service and Forest protections, and supporting Service effort, resulted in an early the realization that the real prize purchases and exchanges to was not just the Pratt, but the Forest Service proposal to protect acquire critical private lands, such the Alpine Lakes area with a two- entire Middle Fork Snoqualmie as the checker-boarded sections valley itself. unit Wilderness of 195,000 acres in the Pratt valley, which are now that was mostly rock and ice. entirely in public ownership. During the development of the The Forest Service initiated Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Forest Plan, The Forest Service prepared completed in 1990, protection of a study of the Alpine Lakes a management plan for the Region in 1971 and developed the Pratt was a high priority for the Alpine Lakes Area as directed environmental community. In fact management alternatives for the by Congress in 1981. While area. The study team eventually the Pratt generated more specific this plan did administratively calls for protection than any other 2 ALPINE area on the national forest. But the Final Push for the Pratt, Middle Fork Snoqualmie and Mt. Forest Service ignored these inputs 2007-2014 Si Natural Resource Conservation and continued to allocate the Pratt Areas just downstream on Ultimately, these outreach for road construction and timber state DNR managed lands. The efforts did bear fruit when cutting. combination of Pratt Wilderness Congressman Dave Reichert and Middle Fork NRCAs now But in April 1990 everything introduced an excellent bill to add includes what many believe to changed when the Jack Ward the Pratt and parts of the Middle be the largest extent of protected Thomas report on the northern Fork and South Fork Snoqualmie lowland forest in the Cascades. All spotted owl proposed major valleys to the Wilderness in 2007. of this is located less than an hour areas of national forest land After the passage of Wild Sky east of Seattle. in Washington, Oregon, and in 2008, Senator Patty Murray California to be withdrawn took up the cause, introducing a ALPS wishes to thank those who from timber production. This revised bill in the Senate, adding took the lead to protect the Pratt, proposal included the Pratt the Middle Fork Snoqualmie especially Senator Patty Murray, Valley, and it was listed in every River as a Wild and Scenic River. Congressman Dave Reichert, and major subsequent owl study. Reichert and Murray were later Congresswoman Suzan DelBene. The pressure to log the Pratt was joined by Suzan DelBene after Many others played important greatly reduced. the 2010 redistricting placed the roles also, including King County The Middle Fork is the closest Pratt-Middle Fork area into the Councilman Reagan Dunn, and mountain valley to Seattle, but by new First Congressional District Neil Strege, in his capacity as a the late 1980s it had degenerated which she now represents. The staffer first with Congresswoman into a sort of mountain slum. three worked as a strong and Jennifer Dunn and later with Shooting, dumping and vandalism effective team to gain passage of Councilman Reagan Dunn. Strege gave it a well-deserved reputation this legislation. took an interest in the Middle Fork and was the right person in the as a place to avoid. But ALPS The bill passed the House, right place to take the initiative members and others formed the and passed the Senate, but never in catalyzing the whole process. Middle Fork Outdoor Recreation in the same Congress
Recommended publications
  • Wenatchee River PCB and DDT Source Assessment
    Wenatchee River PCB and DDT Source Assessment July 2016 Publication No. 16-03-029 Publication information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1603029.html Data for this project are available at Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) website www.ecy.wa.gov/eim/index.htm. Search Study ID WHOB002. The Activity Tracker Code for this study is 14-040. Suggested Citation: Hobbs, W. and M. Friese. 2016. Wenatchee River PCB and DDT Source Assessment. Washington State Dept. of Ecology. Olympia, WA. Publication No. 16-03-029. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/1603029.html Contact information For more information contact: Publications Coordinator Environmental Assessment Program P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: (360) 407-6764 Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecy.wa.gov o Headquarters, Olympia (360) 407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue (425) 649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia (360) 407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Yakima (509) 575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane (509) 329-3400 Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the author or the Department of Ecology. Accommodation Requests: To request ADA accommodation including materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 360-407-6764. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Campsites at Waptus Lake, Alpine Lakes Wilderness
    BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME ___________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ___________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Resource Management ___________________________________________________ by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Darcy Lynn Batura Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Karl Lillquist, Committee Chair ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Anthony Gabriel ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Thomas Cottrell ______________ _________________________________________ Resource Management Program Director ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 The Wilderness Act was created to protect backcountry resources, however; the cumulative effects of recreational impacts are adversely affecting the biophysical resource elements. Waptus Lake is located in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, the most heavily used wilderness in Washington
    [Show full text]
  • Wenatchee River Basin Washington
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUEVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 368 PEOFILE SURVEYS IN WENATCHEE RIVER BASIN WASHINGTON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOKGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 368 PROFILE SURVEYS IN WENATCHEE RIVER BASIN WASHINGTON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF 'R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. General features of Wenatchee River basin__________________ 5 Gaging stations __________________________________ 5 Publications ____________________________________ 6 ILLUSTRATIONS. PI.ATE I. A-K. Plan and profile of Wenatchee Lake, Wenatchee River, and certain tributaries_________A.t end of volume. 49604° WSP 368 14 9 PROFILE SURVEYS IN WENATCHEE RIVER BASIN, WASHINGTON. Prepared under the direction of R. B. MARSHALL, Chief Geographer. GENERAL FEATURES OF WENATCHEE RIVER BASIN. Wenatchee River rises in Cady Pass, in the Cascade Range, Wash­ ington, at an elevation of 4,500 feet, flows southeastward, passing through Wenatchee Lake at an elevation of 1,870 feet, and empties into Columbia River at the town of Wenatchee. With its tributaries it drains a stretch of the eastern slope of the Cascade Mountains about 40 miles long and the territory north of the Yakima River drainage basin, from which it is separated by the Wenatchee Mountains. The river has a number of tributaries, among which may be men­ tioned White River, which flows into Wenatchee Lake near its head, and Chiwawa, Nason, Chumstick, Icicle, Peshastin, and Mission creeks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Script
    Feb rua rg 1968 North Cascades Conservation Council P. 0. Box 156 Un ? ve rs i ty Stat i on Seattle, './n. 98 105 SCRIPT FOR NORTH CASCAOES SLIDE SHOW (75 SI Ides) I ntroduct Ion : The North Cascades fiountatn Range In the State of VJashington Is a great tangled chain of knotted peaks and spires, glaciers and rivers, lakes, forests, and meadov;s, stretching for a 150 miles - roughly from Pt. fiainier National Park north to the Canadian Border, The h undreds of sharp spiring mountain peaks, many of them still unnamed and relatively unexplored, rise from near sea level elevations to seven to ten thousand feet. On the flanks of the mountains are 519 glaciers, in 9 3 square mites of ice - three times as much living ice as in all the rest of the forty-eight states put together. The great river valleys contain the last remnants of the magnificent Pacific Northwest Rain Forest of immense Douglas Fir, cedar, and hemlock. f'oss and ferns carpet the forest floor, and wild• life abounds. The great rivers and thousands of streams and lakes run clear and pure still; the nine thousand foot deep trencli contain• ing 55 mile long Lake Chelan is one of tiie deepest canyons in the world, from lake bottom to mountain top, in 1937 Park Service Study Report declared that the North Cascades, if created into a National Park, would "outrank in scenic quality any existing National Park in the United States and any possibility for such a park." The seven iiiitlion acre area of the North Cascades is almost entirely Fedo rally owned, and managed by the United States Forest Service, an agency of the Department of Agriculture, The Forest Ser• vice operates under the policy of "multiple use", which permits log• ging, mining, grazing, hunting, wt Iderness, and alI forms of recrea• tional use, Hov/e ve r , the 1937 Park Study Report rec ornmen d ed the creation of a three million acre Ice Peaks National Park ombracing all of the great volcanos of the North Cascades and most of the rest of the superlative scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Great American Outdoors Act Projects Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area
    Great American Outdoors Act projects Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area Mountains to Sound Greenway-Heritage Area Multi Asset Recreation Investment Corridor The Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area is an iconic 1.5 million-acre landscape in Washington State, stretching across the Cascade Mountains from Central Washington to Puget Sound in Seattle. The Greenway promotes a healthy and sustainable relationship between people and nature by providing nearby parks and trails, connected wildlife habitat, places for culture and tradition, world-class outdoor recreation and education, working forests and local agricultural production, and thriving communities. The Greenway is valued by a broad cross-section of society, working together as an effective coalition to conserve this place and its heritage for future generations. When Congress passed the Great American Outdoors Act in 2020, we knew how important this legislation would be to the state of Washington. For 30 years the Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust has witnessed the positive impact access to nature brings to the region for public health, habitat and wildlife, and local economies. Many public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and individuals have worked tirelessly to sustain this abundant access to nature, with outdoor recreation gaining popularity each year. As public agency budgets and staff simultaneously shrink, the backlog of much-needed maintenance for trails and recreation areas has grown dramatically. The Great American Outdoors Act offers part of the solution to this maintenance backlog for public land management agencies, and will benefit all people who live, work and play in the Mountains to Sound Greenway and in public lands across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the CHELAN 30-MINUTE by 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON by R
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1661 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHELAN 30-MINUTE BY 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R. W. Tabor, V. A. Frizzell, Jr., J. T. Whetten, R. B. Waitt, D. A. Swanson, G. R. Byerly, D. B. Booth, M. J. Hetherington, and R. E. Zartman INTRODUCTION Bedrock of the Chelan 1:100,000 quadrangle displays a long and varied geologic history (fig. 1). Pioneer geologic work in the quadrangle began with Bailey Willis (1887, 1903) and I. C. Russell (1893, 1900). A. C. Waters (1930, 1932, 1938) made the first definitive geologic studies in the area (fig. 2). He mapped and described the metamorphic rocks and the lavas of the Columbia River Basalt Group in the vicinity of Chelan as well as the arkoses within the Chiwaukum graben (fig. 1). B. M. Page (1939a, b) detailed much of the structure and petrology of the metamorphic and igneous rocks in the Chiwaukum Mountains, further described the arkoses, and, for the first time, defined the alpine glacial stages in the area. C. L. Willis (1950, 1953) was the first to recognize the Chiwaukum graben, one of the more significant structural features of the region. The pre-Tertiary schists and gneisses are continuous with rocks to the north included in the Skagit Metamorphic Suite of Misch (1966, p. 102-103). Peter Misch and his students established a framework of North Cascade metamorphic geology which underlies much of our construct, especially in the western part of the quadrangle. Our work began in 1975 and was essentially completed in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Withdogs
    www.wta.org April 2008 » Washington Trails On Trail « Hiking withDogs Photo by “Sadie’s Driver” Dogs make some of the finest hiking companions. Sadie hikes with her “driver” on the Yellow Aster Butte Trail. Hiking with Your Best Buddy The Northwest is blessed with so many but sometimes that pushed her to the limits. places to venture in the outdoors—no matter Like the time I decided to do a trail run to the what your skill level. And, for some, it’s so top of Mount Dickerman in August. Not real much more enjoyable when you have a four- smart. She collapsed about a mile from the car legged companion to join you. The dogs I have on our way down. The combination of heat and seen on the trail seem so happy to be out roam- insufficient water took its toll. We made it back ing with their humans. fine, but I learned a lesson. Having hiked for a number of years all Some dogs are comfortable rock hopping around Washington and areas in British Colum- and scrambling, but many are not. Sadie could bia, my greatest enjoyment has been with my climb higher and faster than I could, but I al- Sadie’s buddy Sadie. This was a she-devil golden re- ways worried about what would happen when triever who, as a puppy, was a terror! But from she got to the top. Fortunately Sadie was quite Driver Sadie’s Driver lives her very first trip, being on the trail brought out confident on her feet and was cautious enough her best.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic National Park Mountain Goat Removal and Translocation to the North Cascades Progress Report I December 20, 2018
    Olympic National Park Mountain Goat Removal and Translocation to the North Cascades Progress Report I December 20, 2018 Patti Happe1 and Rich Harris2 1Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, Washington 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Box 43141, Olympia, WA 98504 1. Introduction On June 18, 2018, after years of planning and extensive public review, the regional director of the U.S. National Park Service signed a Record of Decision, authorizing the beginning of a plan to remove mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) from Olympic National Park (as well as adjacent portions of the Olympic National Forest). For the first few years of this work, the approved plan calls for most mountain goats to be captured live and transported to staging areas on the Olympic Peninsula where they would formally become the responsibility of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). From these staging areas, mountain goats would then be transported to pre-selected staging areas in the North Cascades, and then brought to release locations where they would be returned to the wild. Details of the rationale and plans are contained in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and the Record of Decision (both available at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectId=49246). This report provides an overview of the capture and translocation efforts during the first fieldwork bout in September 2018. Future progress reports will cover activities during 2019. Technical reports for the scientific literature will follow as appropriate. 2. Capture We had originally planned to implement two capture bouts in 2018 (one in July and one in September).
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation
    THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE May 2008 Geography THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________________ Stan Stevens, Chair ______________________________________________ Piper Gaubatz, Member ______________________________________________ Laurie Brown, Department Head Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the people of the Sky Valley and the Skykomish Ranger District employees who have allowed me to become familiar with Wild Sky, the Forest Service, and the region as a whole. This research is largely based on interviews with the many people interested in the outcome of the Wild Sky Wilderness debate, and I greatly appreciate their willingness to spend time talking with me about the proposal, public involvement, Sky Valley history, and visions for the Valley’s future. Finally, thank you to Stan Stevens and Piper Gaubatz for the many hours they have spent reading and editing my work. iii ABSTRACT THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION MAY 2008 KASSIA C. RANDZIO B.A., KENYON COLLEGE M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Directed by: Professor Stan Stevens Wild Sky, a proposed wilderness in Washington State, has been a source of local contention since its inception. Drawing on the theories of political ecology, international conservation, and actor-based politics, this research seeks to understand the process of public participation in wilderness designation, the arguments both for and against Wild Sky, and how the wilderness proposal process could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelan County Grant No. G0800231 FINAL
    Chelan County Grant No. G0800231 FINAL SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN for Shorelines in the City of Cashmere Project: Comprehensive Shoreline Master Program Update • Task 10: Prepare a Restoration Plan Prepared for: City of Cashmere 101 Woodring Street Cashmere, Washington 98815 Prepared by: 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 This report was funded in part through a grant from the Washington Department of Ecology. Table of Contents Section ......................................................................................................................... Page No. 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Restoration Plan Requirements .................................................................................. 2 1.3 Types of Restoration Activities ................................................................................... 2 1.4 Contents of this Restoration Plan ............................................................................... 3 2. Shoreline Inventory Summary ....................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Shoreline Boundaries .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Northwest Wilderness
    pacific northwest wilderness for the greatest good * Throughout this guide we use the term Wilderness with a capital W to signify lands that have been designated by Congress as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System whether we name them specifically or not, as opposed to land that has a wild quality but is not designated or managed as Wilderness. Table of Contents Outfitter/Guides Are Wilderness Partners .................................................3 The Promise of Wilderness ............................................................................4 Wilderness in our Backyard: Pacific Northwest Wilderness ...................7 Wilderness Provides .......................................................................................8 The Wilderness Experience — What’s Different? ......................................9 Wilderness Character ...................................................................................11 Keeping it Wild — Wilderness Management ...........................................13 Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness .................................................................15 Fire and Wilderness ......................................................................................17 Invasive Species and Wilderness ................................................................18 Climate Change and Wilderness ................................................................19 Resources ........................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]