2 Equations of Motion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 Equations of Motion CSU ATS601 Fall 2015 2 Equations of Motion In this section, we will derive the six full equations of motion in a non-rotating, Cartesian coordinate system. 2.1 Six equations of motion (non-rotating, Cartesian coordinates) For reference, the six non-rotating equations of fluid motion in Cartesian coordinates. There are 5 prognostic equations, i.e. provide information on how the fluid will evolve, and 1 diagnostic equation, i.e. describing the instantaneous state of the fluid. Continuity Equation; Mass Conservation (1): D⇢ + ⇢ ( v) = 0 (2.1) Dt r· or (2.2) @⇢ + (⇢v) = 0 (2.3) @t r· Momentum (Navier-Stokes) Equations; Momentum Conservation (3): Dv p =-r - Φ + ⌫ 2v (2.4) Dt ⇢ r r Thermodynamic Equation; Energy Conservation (1): D✓ ✓ Q˙ p R/cp = , where ✓ = T 0 (2.5) Dt T c p p ✓ ◆ Equation of State (1): p = f(✓, ⇢), e.g. p = ⇢RT (2.6) 2.2 Continuity (conservation of mass) Mass is absolutely conserved in classical mechanics, and so, the conservation of mass is arguably our first building block in describing the evolution of a fluid. 2.2.1 an Eulerian perspective Consider an infinitesimal cube control volume ∆V = ∆x∆y∆z. Fluid moves into and out of the cube at its faces. E. A. Barnes 10 updated 18:35 on Friday 25th September, 2015 CSU ATS6011.2 The Mass Continuity Equation 9 Fall 2015 Fig. 1.1 Mass conservation in a cubic Eulerian control volume. The accumulationface, ofinto fluid the control within volume, the volume is due to flow in the x-direction can be written as .⇢u/ .⇢u/ ıyız@(⇢u) ∆y∆z[(⇢u)(x, y, z)-(⇢ux)(xArea+ ∆x, y, z)]x = - | ∆x∆y∆z.(1.23) (2.7) ⇥ D @x x,y,z where u is the component of velocity in the x-direction, and the subscript x here denotes Similarly, in thethe y-direction coordinate of the argument. A small distance to the right the flow out of the control @(⇢v) volume is - ∆x∆y∆z (2.8) .⇢@uy/x ıxıyız: (1.24) C and z-directionThus, the accumulation of fluid within the control volume, due to motion in the x- direction only, is @(⇢w) - ∆x∆y∆z. (2.9) @z @.⇢u/ ıyızŒ.⇢u/x .⇢u/x ıxç ıxıyız: (1.25) Note the minus signs - this is because having moreC leaveD the@ rightx face compared to the left face (a pos- itive derivative)To thiswould must imply be added a mass the effectsdivergence of motion, or, in mass the y leaving- and z-directions, the cube. namely Thus, the minus sign is the accumulation within the control volume. @.⇢v/ @.⇢w/ ıxıyız: (1.26) @y C @z Thus, the total net accumulation of mass within the control volume can be written as This net accumulation of fluid must@(⇢u be) accompanied@(⇢v) @( by⇢w a) corresponding increase of fluid mass within the control-∆V volume. This+ is + (2.10) @x @y @z @ ✓ @⇢◆ In order to have mass conservation. (somethingDensity Volume we are/ assumingıxıyız here,; that is, it does(1.27) not fall out of the @t ⇥ D @t equations themselves)because the the volume net accumulation is constant. Thus, must because be balanced mass isby conserved, a corresponding (1.25), (1.26) increase and of fluid mass within the control(1.27) volume. give That is, @⇢ @.⇢u/ @.⇢v/ @.⇢w/ ıxıyız 0: (1.28) @(∆V⇢) @@⇢t C @x C @(@⇢yu)C @@(z⇢v) D@(⇢w) = ∆V =-∆V + + (2.11) @t @t @x @y @z Because the control volume is arbitrary the✓ quantity in square brackets◆ must be zero using the factzero that and the wevolume have theof themass cube continuity does not equation: change in time. Moving all of the terms to the left hand @⇢ side, .⇢v/ 0: (1.29) @⇢ @@(⇢t uCr) @(⇢v)D @(⇢w) ∆V + + + = 0 (2.12) @t @x @y @z ✓ ◆ Because the control volume is arbitrary, the quantity in the parentheses must be zero, and thus, the continuity equation is @⇢ @(⇢u) @(⇢v) @(⇢w) @⇢ + + + = + (⇢v)=0. (2.13) @t @x @y @z @t r· E. A. Barnes 11 updated 18:35 on Friday 25th September, 2015 CSU ATS601 Fall 2015 2.2.2 a Lagrangian perspective One come perform a comparable derivation in terms of a fixed fluid parcel to derive the continuity equation from a Lagrangian perspective, but we will not do that here. However, we take a moment to derive the advective/Lagrangian form of continuity starting from 2.13. Using our vector formulas, we know that ( a)= a + a . (2.14) r· r· ·r Thus, @⇢ @⇢ + (⇢v)= + ⇢ v + v ⇢ = 0 (2.15) @t r· @t r· ·r Using the definition of the material derivative (1.11), this leads to the Lagrangian form of mass continuity: D⇢ + ⇢ v = 0. (2.16) Dt r· Note that if the flow is incompressible, then ⇢ = constant and starting from 2.15, the continuity equation becomes @⇢ + ⇢ v + v ⇢ = 0 (2.17) @t r· ·r 0 + ⇢ v + 0 = 0 (2.18) r· and since ⇢ is constant (2.19) v = 0 (2.20) r· Note that the first numerical weather forecast was of the (seemingly simple) equation: D(f+⇣) Dt = 0. 2.3 Momentum equations The momentum equations describe how the momentum (or velocity mass) evolves in time in response ⇥ to both internal and imposed forces. Throughout this course, we will be mostly focused on imposed forces from outside of the fluid, rather than internal forces such as viscosity. Depending on the fluid of interest, there can be a wide range of forces acting on a fluid parcel. The basic starting point is Newton’s 2nd Law: the acceleration of an object depends on the force acting on the object divided by its mass. Or, put another way, F = ma. (2.21) E. A. Barnes 12 updated 18:35 on Friday 25th September, 2015 CSU ATS601 Fall 2015 From this, we can solve for the acceleration a of the fluid element as a function of f which is a force per unit volume: F F f = = = a (2.22) m ⇢V ⇢ However, the acceleration of the parcel is by definition the material derivative of the velocity of the parcel, and so: F f Dv = = a = @tv +(v )v (2.23) m ⇢ ⌘ Dt ·r The goal of deriving the momentum equations (Navier-Stokes equations) is to qauntify all of the forces f acting on the parcel. Here, we will describe the dominant forces acting on earth’s atmosphere and ocean: pressure and gravitational forces with a short comment on internal viscous forces. That is, Dv Fg Fp Fv = @tv +(v )v = + + (2.24) Dt ·r m m m 2.3.1 Gravity Newton’s law of gravity states that: GMm r Fg =- , (2.25) r2 r where the term on the far right is there to provide a direction pointing between the centers of mass of one object with mass M and a second object with mass m. G is the gravitational constant. For gravity on earth, M is the mass of the earth, and r = a + z where a is the radius of the earth. This results in an acceleration of mass m due to gravity ag of Fg fg 1 = =-g kˆ -gkˆ -g kˆ (2.26) m ⇢ 0 (1 + z/a)2 ⌘ ⇡ 0 where g = GM/(a2) 9.81 m/s2, and g = g /(1 + z/a)2. Note that we have assumed that z<<a. 0 ⇡ 0 It turns out it will be useful to define a quantity Φ =-GM/r =-GM/(a + z) called the gravitational potential, which allows us to write -gkˆ without the kˆ notation: -gkˆ =- Φ. (2.27) r Since Φ is the gradient of Φ, in Cartesian coordinates, r @ @ @ - Φ = ˆi + ˆj + kˆ (2.28) r @x @y @z E. A. Barnes 13 updated 18:35 on Friday 25th September, 2015 CSU ATS601 Fall 2015 From the definition of Φ we know that it is only a function of z, and thus, only changes in the local vertical direction. Thus, @ -GM - Φ = 0 + 0 + kˆ (2.29) r @z (a + z) ✓ ◆ @ 1 =-GM kˆ (2.30) @z (a + z) ✓ ◆ 1 =-GM kˆ (2.31) (a + z)2 GM 1 =- kˆ (2.32) a2 (1 + z/a)2 =-gkˆ (2.33) Thus, the acceleration due to the gravitational force is Fg =- Φ. (2.34) m r We have our first acceleration to add to the right-hand-side of our momentum equation: Dv =- Φ + ... (2.35) Dt r 2.3.2 Pressure gradient force Pressure p is a scalar field defines as the force per unit area (A). Pressure always acts normal to the face of the area (denotedn ˆ), that is, it always acts in the direction that makes a 90 degree angle with the surface of the area. Thus, the pressure force acting on an area is Fp = pAnˆ. p y z p∂x p x y z z z y y x x Consider a fluid element, say a cube, of volume ∆V = ∆x∆y∆z. If the pressure is the same on all sides of the cube, it is probably intuitive to you that the no net force will be felt. Now instead consider the case where the pressure force on the left-hand-side of the cube is FLHS = p∆y∆z (2.36) E. A. Barnes 14 updated 18:35 on Friday 25th September, 2015 CSU ATS601 Fall 2015 and the pressure force on the right-hand-side of the cube is FRHS =(p + ∆p)∆y∆z (2.37) due to a slightly different pressure of (p + ∆p). It is the pressure difference, ∆p that determines the net force felt on the cube.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 5: Saturn, Neptune, … A. P. Ingersoll [email protected] 1
    Lecture 5: Saturn, Neptune, … A. P. Ingersoll [email protected] 1. A lot a new material from the Cassini spacecraft, which has been in orbit around Saturn for four years. This talk will have a lot of pictures, not so much models. 2. Uranus on the left, Neptune on the right. Uranus spins on its side. The obliquity is 98 degrees, which means the poles receive more sunlight than the equator. It also means the sun is almost overhead at the pole during summer solstice. Despite these extreme changes in the distribution of sunlight, Uranus is a banded planet. The rotation dominates the winds and cloud structure. 3. Saturn is covered by a layer of clouds and haze, so it is hard to see the features. Storms are less frequent on Saturn than on Jupiter; it is not just that clouds and haze makes the storms less visible. Saturn is a less active planet. Nevertheless the winds are stronger than the winds of Jupiter. 4. The thickness of the atmosphere is inversely proportional to gravity. The zero of altitude is where the pressure is 100 mbar. Uranus and Neptune are so cold that CH forms clouds. The clouds of NH3 , NH4SH, and H2O form at much deeper levels and have not been detected. 5. Surprising fact: The winds increase as you move outward in the solar system. Why? My theory is that power/area is smaller, small‐scale turbulence is weaker, dissipation is less, and the winds are stronger. Jupiter looks more turbulent, and it has the smallest winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Constitutive Modelling
    Chapter 5 Constitutive Modelling 5.1 Introduction Lecture 14 Thus far we have established four conservation (or balance) equations, an entropy inequality and a number of kinematic relationships. The overall set of governing equations are collected in Table 5.1. The Eulerian form has a one more independent equation because the density must be determined, 1 whereas in the Lagrangian form it is directly related to the prescribed initial densityρ 0. Physical Law Eulerian FormN Lagrangian Formn DR ∂r Kinematics: Dt =V , 3, ∂t =v, 3; Dρ ∇ · Mass: Dt +ρ R V=0, 1,ρ 0 =ρJ, 0; DV ∇ · ∂v ∇ · Linear momentum:ρ Dt = R T+ρF , 3,ρ 0 ∂t = r p+ρ 0f, 3; Angular momentum:T=T T , 3,s=s T , 3; DΦ ∂φ Energy:ρ =T:D+ρB ∇ ·Q, 1,ρ =s: e˙+ρ b ∇ r ·q, 1; Dt − R 0 ∂t 0 − Dη ∂η0 Entropy inequality:ρ ∇ ·(Q/Θ)+ρB/Θ, 0,ρ ∇r (q/θ)+ρ b/θ, 0. Dt ≥ − R 0 ∂t ≥ − 0 Independent Equations: 11 10 Table 5.1: The governing equations for continuum mechanics in Eulerian and Lagrangian form. N is the number of independent equations in Eulerian form andn is the number of independent equations in Lagrangian form. Examining the equations reveals that they involve more unknown variables than equations, listed in Table 5.2. Once again the fact that the density in the Lagrangian formulation is prescribed means that there is one fewer unknown compared to the Eulerian formulation. Thus, in either formulation and additional eleven equations are required to close the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Correct Expression of Material Derivative and Application to the Navier-Stokes Equation —– the Solution Existence Condition of Navier-Stokes Equation
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 15 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202003.0030.v4 Correct Expression of Material Derivative and Application to the Navier-Stokes Equation |{ The solution existence condition of Navier-Stokes equation Bo-Hua Sun1 1 School of Civil Engineering & Institute of Mechanics and Technology Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China http://imt.xauat.edu.cn email: [email protected] (Dated: June 15, 2020) The material derivative is important in continuum physics. This paper shows that the expression d @ dt = @t + (v · r), used in most literature and textbooks, is incorrect. This article presents correct d(:) @ expression of the material derivative, namely dt = @t (:) + v · [r(:)]. As an application, the form- solution of the Navier-Stokes equation is proposed. The form-solution reveals that the solution existence condition of the Navier-Stokes equation is that "The Navier-Stokes equation has a solution if and only if the determinant of flow velocity gradient is not zero, namely det(rv) 6= 0." Keywords: material derivative, velocity gradient, tensor calculus, tensor determinant, Navier-Stokes equa- tions, solution existence condition In continuum physics, there are two ways of describ- derivative as in Ref. 1. Therefore, to revive the great ing continuous media or flows, the Lagrangian descrip- influence of Landau in physics and fluid mechanics, we at- tion and the Eulerian description. In the Eulerian de- tempt to address this issue in this dedicated paper, where scription, the material derivative with respect to time we revisit the material derivative to show why the oper- d @ dv @v must be defined.
    [Show full text]
  • ATMOSPHERIC and OCEANIC FLUID DYNAMICS Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC FLUID DYNAMICS Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation Geoffrey K. Vallis Contents Preface xi Part I FUNDAMENTALS OF GEOPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS 1 1 Equations of Motion 3 1.1 Time Derivatives for Fluids 3 1.2 The Mass Continuity Equation 7 1.3 The Momentum Equation 11 1.4 The Equation of State 14 1.5 The Thermodynamic Equation 16 1.6 Sound Waves 29 1.7 Compressible and Incompressible Flow 31 1.8 * More Thermodynamics of Liquids 33 1.9 The Energy Budget 39 1.10 An Introduction to Non-Dimensionalization and Scaling 43 2 Effects of Rotation and Stratification 51 2.1 Equations in a Rotating Frame 51 2.2 Equations of Motion in Spherical Coordinates 55 2.3 Cartesian Approximations: The Tangent Plane 66 2.4 The Boussinesq Approximation 68 2.5 The Anelastic Approximation 74 2.6 Changing Vertical Coordinate 78 2.7 Hydrostatic Balance 80 2.8 Geostrophic and Thermal Wind Balance 85 2.9 Static Instability and the Parcel Method 92 2.10 Gravity Waves 98 v vi Contents 2.11 * Acoustic-Gravity Waves in an Ideal Gas 100 2.12 The Ekman Layer 104 3 Shallow Water Systems and Isentropic Coordinates 123 3.1 Dynamics of a Single, Shallow Layer 123 3.2 Reduced Gravity Equations 129 3.3 Multi-Layer Shallow Water Equations 131 3.4 Geostrophic Balance and Thermal wind 134 3.5 Form Drag 135 3.6 Conservation Properties of Shallow Water Systems 136 3.7 Shallow Water Waves 140 3.8 Geostrophic Adjustment 144 3.9 Isentropic Coordinates 152 3.10 Available Potential Energy 155 4 Vorticity and Potential Vorticity 165 4.1 Vorticity and Circulation 165
    [Show full text]
  • Continuum Fluid Mechanics
    CONTINUUM FLUID MECHANICS Motion A body is a collection of material particles. The point X is a material point and it is the position of the material particles at time zero. x3 Definition: A one-to-one one-parameter mapping X3 x(X, t ) x = x(X, t) X x X 2 x 2 is called motion. The inverse t =0 x1 X1 X = X(x, t) Figure 1. Schematic of motion. is the inverse motion. X k are referred to as the material coordinates of particle x , and x is the spatial point occupied by X at time t. Theorem: The inverse motion exists if the Jacobian, J of the transformation is nonzero. That is ∂x ∂x J = det = det k ≠ 0 . ∂X ∂X K This is the statement of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Definition: Streamlines are the family of curves tangent to the velocity vector field at time t . Given a velocity vector field v, streamlines are governed by the following equations: dx1 dx 2 dx 3 = = for a given t. v1 v 2 v3 Definition: The streak line of point x 0 at time t is a line, which is made up of material points, which have passed through point x 0 at different times τ ≤ t . Given a motion x i = x i (X, t) and its inverse X K = X K (x, t), it follows that the 0 0 material particle X k will pass through the spatial point x at time τ . i.e., ME639 1 G. Ahmadi 0 0 0 X k = X k (x ,τ).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Balanced Flow
    Chapter 7 Balanced flow In Chapter 6 we derived the equations that govern the evolution of the at- mosphere and ocean, setting our discussion on a sound theoretical footing. However, these equations describe myriad phenomena, many of which are not central to our discussion of the large-scale circulation of the atmosphere and ocean. In this chapter, therefore, we focus on a subset of possible motions known as ‘balanced flows’ which are relevant to the general circulation. We have already seen that large-scale flow in the atmosphere and ocean is hydrostatically balanced in the vertical in the sense that gravitational and pressure gradient forces balance one another, rather than inducing accelera- tions. It turns out that the atmosphere and ocean are also close to balance in the horizontal, in the sense that Coriolis forces are balanced by horizon- tal pressure gradients in what is known as ‘geostrophic motion’ – from the Greek: ‘geo’ for ‘earth’, ‘strophe’ for ‘turning’. In this Chapter we describe how the rather peculiar and counter-intuitive properties of the geostrophic motion of a homogeneous fluid are encapsulated in the ‘Taylor-Proudman theorem’ which expresses in mathematical form the ‘stiffness’ imparted to a fluid by rotation. This stiffness property will be repeatedly applied in later chapters to come to some understanding of the large-scale circulation of the atmosphere and ocean. We go on to discuss how the Taylor-Proudman theo- rem is modified in a fluid in which the density is not homogeneous but varies from place to place, deriving the ‘thermal wind equation’. Finally we dis- cuss so-called ‘ageostrophic flow’ motion, which is not in geostrophic balance but is modified by friction in regions where the atmosphere and ocean rubs against solid boundaries or at the atmosphere-ocean interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.1. Description of Motion
    CH.1. DESCRIPTION OF MOTION Multimedia Course on Continuum Mechanics Overview 1.1. Definition of the Continuous Medium 1.1.1. Concept of Continuum Lecture 1 1.1.2. Continuous Medium or Continuum 1.2. Equations of Motion 1.2.1 Configurations of the Continuous Medium 1.2.2. Material and Spatial Coordinates Lecture 2 1.2.3. Equation of Motion and Inverse Equation of Motion 1.2.4. Mathematical Restrictions 1.2.5. Example Lecture 3 1.3. Descriptions of Motion 1.3.1. Material or Lagrangian Description Lecture 4 1.3.2. Spatial or Eulerian Description 1.3.3. Example Lecture 5 2 Overview (cont’d) 1.4. Time Derivatives Lecture 6 1.4.1. Material and Local Derivatives 1.4.2. Convective Rate of Change Lecture 7 1.4.3. Example Lecture 8 1.5. Velocity and Acceleration 1.5.1. Velocity Lecture 9 1.5.2. Acceleration 1.5.3. Example 1.6. Stationarity and Uniformity 1.6.1. Stationary Properties Lecture 10 1.6.2. Uniform Properties 3 Overview (cont’d) 1.7. Trajectory or Pathline 1.7.1. Equation of the Trajectories 1.7.2. Example 1.8. Streamlines Lecture 11 1.8.1. Equation of the Streamlines 1.8.2. Trajectories and Streamlines 1.8.3. Example 1.8.4. Streamtubes 1.9. Control and Material Surfaces 1.9.1. Control Surface 1.9.2. Material Surface Lecture 12 1.9.3. Control Volume 1.9.4. Material Volume 4 1.1 Definition of the Continuous Medium Ch.1. Description of Motion 5 The Concept of Continuum Microscopic scale: Matter is made of atoms which may be grouped in molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Jupiter's Atmosphere
    6 Dynamics of Jupiter's Atmosphere Andrew P. Ingersoll California Institute of Technology Timothy E. Dowling University of Louisville P eter J. Gierasch Cornell University GlennS. Orton J et P ropulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Peter L. Read Oxford. University Agustin Sanchez-Lavega Universidad del P ais Vasco, Spain Adam P. Showman University of A rizona Amy A. Simon-Miller NASA Goddard. Space Flight Center Ashwin R . V asavada J et Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 6.1 INTRODUCTION occurs on both planets. On Earth, electrical charge separa­ tion is associated with falling ice and rain. On Jupiter, t he Giant planet atmospheres provided many of the surprises separation mechanism is still to be determined. and remarkable discoveries of planetary exploration during The winds of Jupiter are only 1/ 3 as strong as t hose t he past few decades. Studying Jupiter's atmosphere and of aturn and Neptune, and yet the other giant planets comparing it with Earth's gives us critical insight and a have less sunlight and less internal heat than Jupiter. Earth broad understanding of how atmospheres work that could probably has the weakest winds of any planet, although its not be obtained by studying Earth alone. absorbed solar power per unit area is largest. All the gi­ ant planets are banded. Even Uranus, whose rotation axis Jupiter has half a dozen eastward jet streams in each is tipped 98° relative to its orbit axis. exhibits banded hemisphere. On average, Earth has only one in each hemi­ cloud patterns and east- west (zonal) jets.
    [Show full text]
  • ATM 500: Atmospheric Dynamics End-Of-Semester Review, December 6 2017 Here, in Bullet Points, Are the Key Concepts from the Second Half of the Course
    ATM 500: Atmospheric Dynamics End-of-semester review, December 6 2017 Here, in bullet points, are the key concepts from the second half of the course. They are not meant to be self-contained notes! Refer back to your course notes for notation, derivations, and deeper discussion. Static stability The vertical variation of density in the environment determines whether a parcel, disturbed upward from an initial hydrostatic rest state, will accelerate away from its initial position, or oscillate about that position. For an incompressible or Boussinesq fluid, the buoyancy frequency is g dρ~ N 2 = − ρ~dz For a compressible ideal gas, the buoyancy frequency is g dθ~ N 2 = θ~dz (the expressions are different because density is not conserved in a small upward displacement of a compressible fluid, but potential temperature is conserved) Fluid is statically stable if N 2 > 0; otherwise it is statically unstable. Typical value for troposphere: N = 0:01 s−1, with corresponding oscillation period of 10 minutes. Dry adiabatic lapse rate g −1 Γd = = 9:8 K km cp The rate at which temperature decreases during adiabatic ascent (for which Dθ Dt = 0) \Dry" here means that there is no latent heating from condensation of water vapor. Static stability criteria for a dry atmosphere Environment is stable to dry con- vection if dθ~ dT~ > 0 or − < Γ dz dz d and otherwise unstable. 1 Buoyancy equation for Boussinesq fluid with background stratification Db0 + N 2w = 0 Dt where we have separated the full buoyancy into a mean vertical part ^b(z) and 0 2 d^b 2 everything else (b ), and N = dz .
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Transport and Mixing 1.1 the Material Derivative Let Be The
    1. Transport and mixing 1.1 The material derivative LetV() x, t be the velocity of a fluid at the pointx = ()x,, y z and timet . Consider also some scalar fieldχ()x, t such as the temperature or density. We are interested not only in the partial derivative ofχ with respect to time,∂χ ∂⁄ t , but also in the time derivative following the motion of the fluid,dχ ⁄ dt . The latter is the so-called material derivative: dχ ⁄dt = lim [] χ(x+ V() x, t δt, t+ δ t )– χ()x, t δ⁄ t δt → 0 . (1.1) = (∂⁄ ∂t + V ⋅ ∇ )χ (),, ∇() ∂ ,,∂ ∂ In Cartesian coordinates,V = u v w ,= x y z and dχ ⁄dt = ∂ χ ∂⁄ t + u∂χ ∂⁄ x +v∂χ ∂⁄ y + w∂χ ∂⁄ z . (1.2) We will also be using spherical coordinates. The notation()u,, v w is conventional for the (eastward, northward, radially outward) components of the velocity field. In addition to the radial distance from the origin,r , we use the symbolθ for latitude (–π ⁄ 2 at the south pole,π ⁄ 2 at the north pole) andλ for longitude (ranging for zero to2π ). The gradient operator in these coordi- nates is ∇= λˆ ()r cosθ –1(∂⁄ ∂λ )+ θˆ r–1()∂⁄ ∂θ + rˆ()∂⁄ ∂r , (1.3) so that d⁄ dt = ∂⁄ ∂t +()r cosθ –1u()∂⁄ ∂λ +r–1v()∂⁄ ∂θ + w()∂⁄ ∂r . (1.4) The material derivative of a vector, such as the velocityV itself, is defined just as in 1.1. But care is required when considering the material derivative of a component of a vector if the unit vectors of one’s coordinate system are position dependent, as they are in spherical coordi- nates.
    [Show full text]
  • General Navier-Stokes-Like Momentum and Mass-Energy Equations
    General Navier-Stokes-like Momentum and Mass-Energy Equations Jorge Monreal Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA Abstract A new system of general Navier-Stokes-like equations is proposed to model electromagnetic flow utilizing analogues of hydrodynamic conservation equa- tions. Such equations are intended to provide a different perspective and, potentially, a better understanding of electromagnetic mass, energy and mo- mentum behavior. Under such a new framework additional insights into electromagnetism could be gained. To that end, we propose a system of momentum and mass-energy conservation equations coupled through both momentum density and velocity vectors. Keywords: Navier-Stokes; Electromagnetism; Euler equations; hydrodynamics PACS: 42.25.Dd, 47.10.ab, 47.10.ad 1. Introduction 1.1. System of Navier-Stokes Equations Several groups have applied the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations to Electro- magnetic (EM) fields through analogies of EM field flows to hydrodynamic fluid flow. Most recently, Boriskina and Reinhard made a hydrodynamic analogy utilizing Euler’s approximation to the Navier-Stokes equation in arXiv:1410.6794v2 [physics.class-ph] 29 Aug 2016 order to describe their concept of Vortex Nanogear Transmissions (VNT), which arise from complex electromagnetic interactions in plasmonic nanos- tructures [1]. In 1998, H. Marmanis published a paper that described hydro- dynamic turbulence and made direct analogies between components of the Email address: [email protected] (Jorge Monreal) Preprint submitted to Annals of Physics August 30, 2016 NS equation and Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism[2]. Kambe for- mulated equations of compressible fluids using analogous Maxwell’s relation and the Euler approximation to the NS equation[3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Diagnostic Model for Initial Winds in Primitive
    1 1 A DIAGNOSTIC MODEL FOR INITIAL WINDS IN PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS FORECASTS by Richard Asselin Department of Meteorology, Ph. D. ABSTRACT The set of primitive meteorologicai equations reduces to a single second order partial differential cquation when the accel- eration is replaced by the derivative of the geostrophic wind in the equation.of motion. From this equation a diagnostic three-dimensional wind field can be computed when the pressure distribution is known. Calculations for a barotropic atmosphere are performed fir st; the rotational part of the wind is found to be similar to that from the classical balance equation and the divergent part agrees well with synoptic experience. A forecast thus initialized contaills Lese; gravi- tational activity than one initialized with the non-divergent wind of the balance equation. With a five-level baroclinic atmosphere. the effects of mountains, surface drag, and release of latent heat are studi~d separately; the results arc consistent wlth classical concepts and other interesting features are revealed. T!;e diagnostic surfa:::e pres­ sure tendency is fo~nd to be in very good agreement with the observed pressure changes. A DIAGNOSTIC MODEL FOR INITIAL WINDS IN PRIMITIVE EQUATiONS FORECASTS by RI CHARD ASSE LIN . A the sis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Re search in partial fulfillrnent of the requirernents for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Departrnent of Meteorology McGill Univer sity Montreal, Canada July. 1970 1971 A DL~GNOSTIC MODEL FOR INITIAL WINDS IN PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS FORECASTS by RI CHARD ASSE LIN . A thesis submitted ta the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements.
    [Show full text]