DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Trade Commission Decisions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Trade Commission Decisions FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS FINDINGS, OPINIONS, AND ORDERS JANUARY 1, 2002 TO JUNE 30, 2002 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSION VOLUME 133 Compiled by The Office of the Secretary Ami Joy Rop, Editor MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DURING THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2002 TO JUNE 30, 2002 TIMOTHY J. MURIS, Chairman Took oath of office June 4, 2001. SHEILA F. ANTHONY, Commissioner Took oath of office September 30, 1997. MOZELLE W. THOMPSON, Commissioner Took oath of office December 17, 1997. ORSON SWINDLE, Commissioner Took oath of office December 18, 1997. THOMAS B. LEARY, Commissioner Took oath of office November 17, 1999. DONALD S. CLARK, Secretary Appointed August 28, 1988. CONTENTS _______________ Page Members of the Commission........................... II Table of Cases...................................... III Findings, Opinions, and Orders.......................... 1 Responses to Petitions to Quash ....................... 964 TABLE OF CASES _____________ Dkt. No. Name Page C-4036 A & S Pharmaceutical Corp. ..................501 D-9297 American Home Products ....................611 C-4051 Asahi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. .............836 C-4043 Campbell Mithun LLC ......................702 C-4023 Chevron Corporation, et al. .....................1 C-4045 Deutsche Gelatine-Fabriken Stoess AG, et al. ....745 C-4032 Diageo PLC, et al. ..........................156 C-4047 Eli Lilly and Company ......................763 C-4050 FMC Corporation ..........................815 C-4071 INA-Holding Schaeffler KG, et al. .............379 C-4042 Interstate Bakeries Corporation ...............687 C-4027 Koninklijke Ahold NV, et al. .................121 C-4052 Kryton Coatings International, Inc..............857 C-4037 LNK International, Inc. ......................518 C-4035 Leiner Health Products, Inc. ..................485 C-4028 Nestle Holdings, Inc., et al. ...................236 C-4048 Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Corporation of Napa Valley, et al...........................794 C-4041 Palm, Inc. ................................715 C-4039 Perrigo Company ..........................559 C-4038 Pharmaceutical Formulations, Inc. .............537 C-4040 Pletschke, Kris A., Individually and Doing Business as Raw Health...............................574 C-4046 Solvay S.A. ...............................879 C-4041 Technobrands, Inc., et al. ....................647 C-4034 Tru-Vantage International, L.L.C. .............299 C-4031 Valero Energy Corporation, et al. ..............416 PETITIONS TO QUASH 0223011 Loree & Lord .............................976 D-9171 Superior Court Trial Lawyers’ Association ......964 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS 1 VOLUME 133 Complaint IN THE MATTER OF CHEVRON CORPORATION, ET AL. CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-4023; File No. 0110011 Complaint, September 7, 2001--Decision, January 2, 2002 This consent order addresses the merger of Respondent Chevron Corporation and Respondent Texaco Inc., both large integrated oil companies engaged in the exploration for, and production of, oil and natural gas; the pipeline transportation of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids; the refining of crude oil into refined petroleum products, including gasoline, aviation fuel, and other light petroleum products; the transportation, terminaling, and marketing of gasoline and aviation fuel; and other related businesses. The order, among other things, requires the respondents to divest, to Shell Oil Company, all of Respondent Texaco’s interests in two joint ventures – Equilon Enterprises, LLC, jointly owned with Shell; and Motiva Enterprises, LLC, jointly owned with Shell and Saudi Refining, Inc. – that together own all of Texaco’s United States petroleum refining, marketing and transportation businesses, including (a) gasoline marketing in 22 States; (b) the marketing of California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) gasoline in California; ( c) refining and bulk supply of CARB gasoline for sale in California; (d) refining and bulk supply of gasoline and jet fuel in the Pacific Northwest; (e) the Explorer Pipeline and the bulk supply of certain reformulated gasoline (“RFG II”) into St. Louis; (f) terminaling of gasoline and other light products in ten metropolitan areas in five States; (g) the Equilon pipeline that transports crude oil from California’s San Joaquin Valley; and (h) the Equilon crude oil pipeline in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. The order also requires the respondents to divest Texaco’s one-third interest in the Discovery Pipeline System and its interest in the Enterprise fractionating plant in Mont Belvieu, Texas, to acquirers approved by the Commission. In addition, the order requires the respondents to divest Texaco’s general aviation business in fourteen states to Avfuel Corporation. An accompanying Order to Hold Separate requires the respondents to hold separate and maintain certain assets pending divestiture. Participants For the Commission: Dennis F. Johnson, Renee S. Henning, Frank Lipson, Art Nolan, Peter A. Richman, Constance Salemi, Marc W. Schneider, W. Stephen Sockwell, Patricia V. Galvan, 2 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS VOLUME 133 Complaint Karen Harris, Phillip L. Broyles, Elizabeth A. Piotrowski, Michael E. Antalics, Naomi Licker, Daniel P. Ducore, M. Sean Royall, Louis Silvia, David W. Meyer and Daniel P. O’Brien. For the Respondents: Terry Calvani, Al Boro, John Grenfell, and Cecil Chung, Pillsbury Winthrop, and Marc Schildkraut, Timothy Boyle, and Lisa Jose Fales, Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), having reason to believe that Respondent Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) and Respondent Texaco Inc. (“Texaco”) have entered into an agreement and plan of merger whereby Chevron proposes to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Texaco, that such agreement and plan of merger violates Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges as follows: I. RESPONDENTS Chevron Corporation 1. Respondent Chevron is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Delaware, with its office and principal place of business located at 575 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. 2. Respondent Chevron is, and at all times relevant herein has been, a diversified energy company engaged, either directly or through affiliates, in the exploration for, and production of, oil and natural gas; the pipeline transportation of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids; the refining of crude oil into FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS 3 VOLUME 133 Complaint refined petroleum products, including gasoline, aviation fuel, and other light petroleum products; the transportation, terminaling, and marketing of gasoline, diesel fuel, and aviation fuel; and other related businesses. 3. Respondent Chevron owns approximately 26% of Dynegy Inc. (“Dynegy”). Dynegy is engaged in the gathering, processing, fractionation, transmission, terminaling, storage, and marketing of natural gas and natural gas liquids. Chevron has a long-term strategic alliance with Dynegy for the marketing of Chevron’s natural gas and natural gas liquids, and the supply of natural gas and natural gas liquids to Chevron’s refineries in the lower 48 states of the United States. Chevron has three positions on Dynegy’s Board of Directors. This relationship gives Chevron access to information concerning Dynegy’s business and allows Chevron to participate in Dynegy’s business decisions. 4. Respondent Chevron is, and at all times relevant herein has been, engaged in commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 1 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 12, and is a corporation whose business is in or affecting commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 44. Texaco Inc. 5. Respondent Texaco is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Delaware, with its office and principal place of business located at 2000 Westchester Ave., White Plains, NY 10650. 6. Respondent Texaco is, and at all times relevant herein has been, a diversified energy company engaged, either directly or through affiliates, in the exploration for, and production of, oil and natural gas; the pipeline transportation of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids; the refining of crude oil into refined petroleum products, including gasoline, aviation fuel, and other light petroleum products; the transportation, 4 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS VOLUME 133 Complaint terminaling, and marketing of gasoline, diesel fuel, and aviation fuel; and other related businesses. 7. Respondent Texaco is, and at all times relevant herein has been, engaged in commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 1 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 12, and is a corporation whose business is in or affecting commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 44. 8. In 1998, Texaco contributed its U.S. petroleum refining, marketing and transportation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trudeau Complaint
    Case 1:05-cv-00400-JDB Document 1-1 Filed 02/28/2005 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________________ ) KEVIN TRUDEAU, an individual ) 601 Del Oro ) Ojai, CA 93023, ) ) ) No.: ____________ Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. ) Washington, D.C. 20580, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________________ ) COMPLAINT Kevin Trudeau, by his attorneys, brings this complaint and alleges as follows: NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief by Plaintiff Kevin Trudeau ("Trudeau") against the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") to correct a false and misleading press release designed to cause injury to Trudeau. Trudeau is an author and consumer advocate, and has been a producer of television infomercials for direct response marketing. In the broadcast media, and in his books and newsletters, Trudeau has expressed views and opinions bluntly criticizing federal agencies – in particular the FTC. Recently, Trudeau's views and opinions about the FTC have gained wide circulation via his best-selling book, Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About (the "Natural Cures book"). The Natural Cures book is marketed chiefly by an infomercial (the "Natural Cures infomercial"), which Trudeau also uses Case 1:05-cv-00400-JDB Document 1-1 Filed 02/28/2005 Page 2 of 15 as a vehicle to express his views regarding the relationship between the FTC and elements of the pharmaceutical industry, and which infomercial is widely distributed throughout the United States. 2. Prior to the success of the Natural Cures book, Trudeau had entered into a stipulated order ("Stipulated Order") with the FTC regarding Trudeau's marketing of an alternative health product known as coral calcium.
    [Show full text]
  • KEVIN TRUDEAU Individually
    2/4/2020 KEVIN TRUDEAU individually, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, V. KEVIN TRUDEAU individually, Defendant. Civil Action No COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), for its complaint alleges as follows: 1. The Commission brings this action under section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. 53(b), to secure preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, rescission of contracts, restitution, disgorgement, and other equitable relief for defendants’ unfair and deceptive acts and practices in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a) and 52. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and under 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1) and 53(b). 3. Venue in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c) and 15 U.S.C. 53(b). PLAINTIFF 4. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission, is an independent agency of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. The Commission is charged, inter alia, with enforcement of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a) and 52. Section 5(a) of the FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK KEVIN TRUDEAU and ALLIANCE PUBLISHING GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs
    Case 1:05-cv-01019-GLS-RFT Document 83 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN TRUDEAU and ALLIANCE PUBLISHING GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, - v - Civ. No. 1:05-CV-1019 (GLS/RFT) NEW YORK STATE CONSUMER PROTECTION BOARD; TERESA A. SANTIAGO, in her official capacity; and JON SORENSEN, in his official capacity, Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JENNER, BLOCK LAW FIRM ANDREW A. JACOBSON, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANIEL J. HURTADO, ESQ. One IBM Plaza DAVID J. BRADFORD, ESQ. Chicago, IL 60611 JENNER, BLOCK LAW FIRM DANIEL MACH, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 601 Thirteenth Street, NW 12th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 MCNAMEE, LOCHNER LAW FIRM KEVIN LAURILLIARD, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLIAM A. HURST, ESQ. 677 Broadway Albany, NY 12207 HISCOCK, BARCLAY LAW FIRM MICHAEL J. GRYGIEL, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 50 Beaver Street Albany, NY 12207 WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM LORI J. VAN AUKEN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Case 1:05-cv-01019-GLS-RFT Document 83 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 37 HON. ELIOT SPITZER ROGER W. KINSEY, ESQ. Attorney General for the State of New York BRIDGET ERIN HOLOHAN, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants JAMES B. MCGOWAN, ESQ. The Capitol Assistant Attorney Generals Albany, NY 12224 RANDOLPH F. TREECE United States Magistrate Judge MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiffs, Kevin Trudeau and Alliance Publishing Group, Inc., make a Motion to Amend their Complaint to add another Plaintiff, Shop America (USA) L.L.C., another Defendant, Caroline Quartararo, Deputy Executive Director of the Consumer Protection Board (“CPB”), claims for monetary damages against Teresa Santiago, Caroline Quartararo, and John Sorensen in their individual capacities for acts undertaken in their official capacities, state law defamation claims against Santiago, Sorensen, and Quartararo, and in the alternative, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Family of the Month
    F AMILY OF THE MONTH COUNCIL WINNER LIST DECEMBER 2019 Jurisdiction Council Family Jurisdiction Council Family Alabama 10354 Paul V. Boike Mississippi 15155 Zane Beasley Alaska 12290 Richard K. Miller Missouri 17355 Gabriel Jones Arizona 8077 George Mignon Montana 6294 Randy R. Smith Arkansas 11604 Robert Bortst Nebraska 6192 Ricky Bennett British 11916 Parry Fung Nevada 14784 Michael J. Clinton Columbia New Mexico 14124 Cipriano Morales Colorado 9597 Gary Nydegger New York 3676 Herb Allen Connecticut 10 Kevin Trudeau Newfoundland 9303 Raymond Rossiter Delaware 4548 Al Ware North 2546 John Gouldie Florida 14278 Tim Pasden Carolina Georgia 6517 Bill Cormier North Dakota 4894 Larry Louser Hawaii 6734 Archimedes Ohio 4361 Michael A. Duska Agcamaran Ontario 9544 Eamon Duffy Idaho 1024 Thomas J. Pung Oregon 14802 David Judy Illinois 8699 Terry Butzen Pennsylvania 4084 Chris Ransel Indiana 563 Richard G. Kilgus Rhode Island 113 Ovide Auger Iowa 5389 Randy Elliott South Carolina 7531 William Hutton Kansas 3273 Tanner Lang Tennessee 8152 George Macken Kentucky 4473 Keith Schnell Texas 3168 John Meehan Louisiana 1208 Paul H. Gulotta Sr. Utah 12181 Joseph Oppedisano Luzon North 9763 Reynaldo F. Vermont 5041 Peter Rossiter Galapon, Jr. Virginia 7812 Michael Fitzpatrick Luzon South 7654 Gilbert P. Mendoza Washington 894 Jesus Mendoza Maine 10019 Dan Lake West Virginia 10756 Kenneth Bageant Manitoba 5870 Barry Klym Wisconsin 1475 Peter Gabrielson Maryland 11259 Joseph Garcia Wyoming 5447 Thomas J. Ryder Massachusetts 420 John (Jack) O'Brien Michigan
    [Show full text]
  • I Do’ Our Pets with Their Fur Babies MARCH 22, 2018 | VOL
    Joy Geng Reflects on Decades of LGBTQ Activism Trey Pearson Finds Community Through Queer-Affirming Music March for Our Lives: Local Events Spring Pet Guide For the Love of Couples Say ‘I Do’ Our Pets With Their Fur Babies WWW.PRIDESOURCE.COM MARCH 22, 2018 | VOL. 2612 | FREE SPRING PET GUIDE ENTERTAINMENT 16 Couples Say ‘I Do’ With Their Fur Karola Wollstein (left) and Diane Stead (right) with Babies Hansi and Sylvie, their Wheaton Terriers. The couple 20 Pets and the LGBTQ Owners Who was married in June 2017. Photo courtesy of Milhem Images, Inc. Love Them COVER 22 Five Ways to Cope with the Death 24 From Christian Rock 16 For the Love of Our Pets of a Pet to Pops’s ‘Silver Horizon’ 23 May 12: Strutting Mutts Help Local Trey Pearson Finds Community NEWS Animal Shelter 16 Couples Say ‘I Do’ Through Queer-Affirming Music 4 U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell, Vegas mass Shooting 23 Bloomfield Hills Woman Offered Survivor and Others to Attend March for Our Lives in $500K for Pet Speaker on ‘Shark Tank’ Ann Arbor with Furry Friends 4 LGBT Advocates Joining March For Our Lives in D.C. 6 Dr. Abdul El-Sayed Challenges Tradition as Gubernatorial Candidate 8 Longtime LGBTQ Activist Joy Geng Reitres, Reflects on COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS NEWS HAPPENINGS Decades of Engagement 12 Pence Criticized for Excluding Media from Breakfast with Gay Irish PM 13 Bisexual Rio Councilwoman, Human Rights Activist Killed 14 Study Examines U.S. Views on Polarizing Issues OPINION 12 Pence Criticized for Excluding Media 30 Best of LGBT Events 10 Parting Glances from Breakfast with Gay Irish PM 10 Viewpoint 11 Creep of the Week INTERVIEW LIFE 32 Statewide Events to Celebrate 24 From Christian Rock to Pop’s ‘Silver Horizon’ International Transgender Day of Visbility 26 From Film to the Stage: Melissa McKamie Refreshes 32 Joe Kort Teams Up with Modern Sex Baronness Elsa Schraeder in ‘The Sound of Music’ Therapy Institutes to Offer LGBTQ-Affirmative Therapy Certification Program 28 Worship Guide 26 Out Actress in 30 Happenings 34 Black and Pink Picks New Executive 6 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Bad Speakers, Performance Bonds & Unfree Speech
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLS\3-2\HLS201.txt unknown Seq: 1 9-MAY-12 17:24 Past Bad Speakers, Performance Bonds & Unfree Speech: Lawfully Incentivizing “Good” Speech or Unlawfully Intruding on the First Amendment? Clay Calvert* ABSTRACT Using the recent legal woes of television pitchman Kevin Trudeau as an analytical springboard, this article examines the multiple First Amend- ment issues and red flags raised by the imposition of performance bonds on “past bad speakers” as conditions precedent for their future speech. Per- formance bonds, the article argues, blur the traditional line that separates prior restraints from subsequent punishments in First Amendment jurispru- dence. They also represent a form of government intrusion in the market- place of ideas — a form of interventionism, premised on financial incentivism — that ostensibly discourages dangerous or otherwise unlawful speech from re-entering the speech market. This article also addresses the proper standard of judicial scrutiny that should be used to evaluate the va- lidity of performance bonds. Furthermore, it considers whether the scope of performance bonds is necessarily limited to scenarios involving the Federal Trade Commission or whether such bonds can also be imposed in other con- tempt proceedings and/or by other federal agencies, such as the Federal Communications Commission. * Professor & Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication and Founding Director of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. B.A., 1987, Communication, Stanford University; J.D. (Order of the Coif), 1991, McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific; Ph.D., 1996, Communication, Stanford University. Member, State Bar of California.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States ______
    No. __-____ In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ KEVIN M. TRUDEAU, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT __________ ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT __________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________ KIMBALL R. ANDERSON STEFFEN JOHNSON THOMAS KIRSCH, II Counsel of Record Winston & Strawn LLP JEFF P. JOHNSON 35 West Wacker Drive PAUL KANELLOPOULOS Chicago, IL 60601 STEPHEN J. MIGALA (312) 558-5600 Winston & Strawn LLP 1700 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 282-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The Speedy Trial Act applies to “any Federal criminal offense which is in violation of any Act of Congress and is triable by any court established by Act of Congress (other than a Class B or C misde- meanor or an infraction, or an offense triable by [a military court]).” 18 U.S.C. § 3172(2). The criminal contempt statute does not classify criminal contempt as a Class B or C misdemeanor; it provides only that a federal court “shall have power to punish [contempt of its authority] by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion.” 18 U.S.C. § 401. The first question presented is: Whether a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401 should be classified as a Class A felony under 18 U.S.C. § 3559 (as the First and Fourth Circuits hold), similarly to the closest analogous offense (as the Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits hold), or sui generis based on the penalty actually imposed by the court (as the Third, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits hold).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT, Filed by Renee
    BlaszkowskiNatural et Choice al v. Mars Complete Inc. et al Care Indoor Adult Dry Cat Food Page 1 of 4 Doc. 153 Att. 10 Case 1:07-cv-21221-CMA Document 153-11 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 121 Benefits of Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Adult: For cats 1 to 6 years Scientifically formulated for the unique needs of indoor cats Guaranteed* to improve skin & coat for less shedding, fewer hairballs Advanced antioxidants for a healthy immune system Formulated to reduce litter box and in-home odor Natural Choice Natural ingredients with vitamins Complete Care & minerals Product Center Recommended by veterinarians Click on the links below to learn more about this product. Indoor Cats Have Special Nutritional Needs. Indoor temperature, lighting and reduced opportunity for exercise can affect the health of your cat's skin and coat, muscle and bone condition and may cause weight gain. If your adult cat lives indoors most of the time, then feeding Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Adult Formula can improve your cat's overall health and well-being. Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Adult is not just another cat food. Based on the latest scientific and nutritional research, our Indoor Adult formula is guaranteed to improve your indoor cat's skin and coat, reduce shedding, minimize hairballs, build strong muscles and bones and help Try these other products! limit excess weight gain*. It's formulated with unique ingredients like chicken meal, rice, sunflower oil, oat fiber and soy protein concentrate, which are especially important for indoor cats.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Cat Food Calorie Content
    Popular Cat Food Calorie Content Dry Food (Calories per Cup) Advanced Pet Diets Select Choice Chicken & Salmon Meal Original Kitten/Adult 421 Chicken & Salmon Meal Lite 331 Alpo Gourmet Dinner 379 Seafood Flavor 378 Authority Kitten Chicken Meal & Rice 420 Chicken Meal & Rice 404 Lamb Meal & Rice 376 Whitefish Meal & Rice 410 Lite Chicken Meal & Rice 312 Senior Chicken Meal & Rice 344 AvoDerm Natural Kitten – Chicken & Herring Meal Formula 459 Chicken & Herring Meal Formula 375 Indoor Formula w/ Hairball Care – Chicken & 388 Herring Meal Formula Bench & Field Holistic Natural Feline Formula 378 1 Blue Longevity Kitten 397 Adult 379 Mature 337 Blue Spa Select Kitten – Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe 587 Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe 542.5 Salmon & Brown Rice Recipe 513 Indoor Cat Formula – Chicken & Brown Rice 478 Recipe Indoor Sensitive Skin – Turkey & Brown Rice 475 Recipe Weight Control – Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe 458 Mature – Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe 487 Blue Organics w/ LifeSource Bits 542 Blue Wilderness Natural Evolutionary Diet w/ LifeSource Bits 587 California Natural Chicken & Brown Rice 393 Chicken Soup for the Pet-Lover’s Soul Kitten 373 Adult 367 Light 302 Dick Van Patten Nature’s Formula Ultra Premium 553 Reduced Calorie 385 2 Doctors Foster & Smith Kitten 500 Chicken & Brown Rice 470 Lite – Chicken & Brown Rice 341 Advanced Hairball Control – Chicken & Brown 481 Rice Eukanuba Kitten Chicken & Rice Formula 570 Chicken & Rice Formula 573 Salmon & Rice Formula 525 Lamb & Rice Formula 570 Hairball Relief Formula 473 Sensitive
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Cures They Dont Want You to Know About PDF Book
    NATURAL CURES THEY DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kevin Trudeau | 592 pages | 30 Jan 2007 | Alliance Publishing Group | 9780975599594 | English | Elk Grove Village, IL, United States Natural Cures they Dont Want You to Know About PDF Book They are experts at eliminating disease symptoms, but remember… elimination of the symptom is NOT the same as elimination of the disease. Worst of all are the natural cures that the book directs the reader to Trudeau's Web page to find. District Court Judge Robert W. The stats the authors gives are blatantly BS with one being that it is expected that most americans will ingest pounds of over the counter medications over a twenty year period. The Manufacture of Madness, Thomas S. These people want to keep you sick for their gain. It exposes the corruption in government and Big Food, and teaches you how to be a more savvy consumer and steward of your health. It is very poorly written and does not contain anything that would ever be cosidered secret September 19, The information is there if you want to open your eyes and really see what is before you. Drug-front groups have implemented slanderous campaigns in attempts to undermine the value of natural health lifestyles. Author Kevin Trudeau discusses everything from the common toxic ingredients in our food to natural remedies for a host of diseases and ailments. Please pardon our dust! The most disturbing aspect of Trudeau's book is the disclaimer, in which he states tongue-in-cheek to appease the FTC that his book "is for entertainment purposes only," that "truth is sprinkled in to spice things up," and that "the stuff in this book really doesn't work.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformational Challenge Nestlé 1990–2005
    I wanted to stimulate your creative thinking and give Our goal is to earn consumers’ trust as their preferred you a more in-depth feeling of some of the resources Food, Beverage, Nutrition, Health and Wellness Company available in the Group, which are not always suffi ciently both for their own needs and those of their family mem- exploited. We have therefore again organised, not only bers, including their pets. We understand consumers’ the very much appreciated Product Exhibition, but also Nestlé 1990–2005 Challenge Transformational nutritional and emo- a visit to IMD, where we will be exposed to the latest tional needs/prefer- thinking on relevant business issues seen from the aca- TTransformational ransformational ences and provide demic point of view. A visit to our Research Centre at CChallenge hallenge them with innova- Lausanne, which, by the way, celebrates its 10th anni- tive branded prod- versary, will give you the opportunity to get a better idea NNestléestlé 11990–2005990–2005 ucts and services of how those 650 people can help you to achieve a AAlbertlbert PPfifi fffnerfner based on superior higher degree of competitiveness in the market place. HHans-Jörgans-Jörg RRenkenk science and technol- But before starting on the specifi c issues, let me make ogy. By serving our a preliminary remark: it is only fair that I should explain consumers and im- to you how most of our subjects for discussion fi t into proving their quality a broader framework, namely the development strategy of life, everywhere in of our Group. Over the past years, I have had more than the world, we ensure once the opportunity to refl ect on the shape of things profi table, sustain- to come, to use H.G.
    [Show full text]
  • DA Steve Crump: Death Penalty Burden ‘Heavy’ by BRIAN GRAVES Decided He Was Not “Going to Pass It Off There Are Not Enough Assistants
    FRIDAY 161st YEAR • NO. 61 JULY 10, 2015 CLEVELAND, TN 22 PAGES • 50¢ DA Steve Crump: Death penalty burden ‘heavy’ By BRIAN GRAVES decided he was not “going to pass it off there are not enough assistants. potential strategy they can use.” Banner Staff Writer THIRD IN A to anybody else.” In a metropolitan district, Crump Crump said there are certain cases a “The way my schedule works, I sim- said a DA cannot be in the courtroom at DA has to be involved with — a death It is the ultimate punishment 4-PART SERIES ply can’t keep a caseload,” Crump said. all, noting the DA in Memphis has 106 penalty case being one of them. reserved for the most heinous of He said the 10th District is on the assistants. At this point in the interview, Crump crimes. edge between a rural district and a met- Crump said with his district being a recalled the time, while he served as an It is the death penalty. about another. ropolitan district. mix of those two district definitions, he assistant DA, when he successfully It is when that finality is being Because of his administrative “Managing 15 lawyers takes a large has the luxury to be able to visit prosecuted a death penalty case. sought that a district attorney general responsibilities, it is not possible for part of my day,” he said. “If each of General Sessions Court. It is a story he admits he has never becomes involved in the case. him to personally prosecute every case. them only needs five minutes of my day “I spent the last two non-jury days in told in detail.
    [Show full text]