DOCSLIB.ORG

A Survey of Benthic Macrophytes in Three Hard-Water Lakes: Lough

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Survey of Benthic Macrophytes in Three Hard-Water Lakes: Lough A survey of the benthic macrophytes of three hard-water lakes: Lough Bunny, Lough Carra and Lough Owel Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 70 A survey of the benthic macrophytes of three hard-water lakes: Lough Bunny, Lough Carra and Lough Owel Cilian Roden and Paul Murphy Citation: Roden, C. and Murphy, P. (2013) A survey of the benthic macrophytes of three hard-water lakes: Lough Bunny, Lough Carra and Lough Owel. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 70. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Keywords: hard-water lakes, marl, charophytes, cyanobacterial crust, macrophytes, groundwater Site list: 000688, Lough Owel; 001774, Lough Carra/Mask Complex; 001926, East Burren Complex Cover photos: Chara tomentosa and Chara curta at 3m in Lough Owel. © NPWS The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Dr Áine O Connor, Aine.O'[email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & R. Jeffrey © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2013 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Hard-water lake survey ___________________ Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................3 Methods.....................................................................................................................................................5 Site descriptions ........................................................................................................................................6 Lough Bunny.........................................................................................................................................6 Lough Carra...........................................................................................................................................6 Lough Owel...........................................................................................................................................7 Vegetation classification and mapping....................................................................................................9 The nature of lake vegetation ...............................................................................................................9 Lough Bunny.......................................................................................................................................13 Krustenstein.....................................................................................................................................13 Marl ..................................................................................................................................................13 Chara curta.......................................................................................................................................13 Chara rudis/Nupar lutea community.............................................................................................13 Schoenoplectus lacustris stands......................................................................................................15 Chara globularis ..............................................................................................................................15 Nitella community...........................................................................................................................15 Cyanobacterial mat community .....................................................................................................15 Vegetation of springs or depressions .............................................................................................15 Lough Carra.........................................................................................................................................15 Krustenstein.....................................................................................................................................16 Chara curta.......................................................................................................................................16 Chara tomentosa..............................................................................................................................16 Chara rudis ......................................................................................................................................16 Hard-water lake survey ___________________ Chara globularis.............................................................................................................................. 16 Elodea canadensis and Myriophyllum verticillatum ................................................................... 16 Chara denudata .............................................................................................................................. 16 Vegetation of dolines...................................................................................................................... 18 River-mouth communities ............................................................................................................. 18 Lough Owel ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Krustenstein .................................................................................................................................... 18 Chara curta...................................................................................................................................... 18 Chara rudis...................................................................................................................................... 18 Chara globularis.............................................................................................................................. 20 Chara denudata .............................................................................................................................. 20 Aquatic angiosperms...................................................................................................................... 20 Vegetation of dolines at the southern end of Lough Owel .......................................................... 20 What is the characteristic vegetation of marl lakes? ........................................................................ 20 Vegetation maps................................................................................................................................. 25 Maximum depth of macrophytes and community type.................................................................. 37 The flora of marl lakes ........................................................................................................................... 38 Chara tomentosa................................................................................................................................. 38 Chara aculeolata ................................................................................................................................. 38 Chara rudis ......................................................................................................................................... 39 Chara denudata .................................................................................................................................. 39 Chara globularis/ Chara virgata ........................................................................................................ 39 Myriophyllum alterniflorm ............................................................................................................... 39 Ranunculus sp. .................................................................................................................................... 40 Historical comparison............................................................................................................................ 41 Flora and vegetation........................................................................................................................... 41 Lough Bunny................................................................................................................................... 41 Hard-water lake survey ___________________ Lough Carra.....................................................................................................................................41 Lough Owel .....................................................................................................................................42 Water chemistry ..................................................................................................................................43 Lough Bunny ...................................................................................................................................43 Lough Carra.....................................................................................................................................44 Lough Owel .....................................................................................................................................45 The current conservation status of the lakes .........................................................................................46
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Loughs Carra, Mask and Corrib; Resources, Borders and Passageways
    Loughs Carra, Mask and Corrib; resources, borders and passageways A National Heritage Week 2020 Project by the Joyce Country and Western Lakes Heritage Network Introduction: Loughs Carra, Mask and Corrib are all connected with all their waters draining into the Atlantic Ocean. Their origins lie in the surrounding bedrock and the moving ice that dominated the Irish landscape. Today they are landscape icons, angling paradise and drinking water reservoirs but they have also shaped the communities on their shores. This project, the first of the Joyce Country and Western Lakes Heritage Network, explores the relationships that the people from the local towns and villages have had with these lakes, how they were perceived, how they were used and how they have been embedded in their history. The project consists of a series of short articles on various subjects that were composed by heritage officers of the local community councils and members of the local historical societies. They will dwell on the geological origin of the lakes, evidence of the first people living on their shores, local traditions and historical events and the inspiration that they offered to artists over the years. These articles are collated in this document for online publication on the Joyce Country and Western Lakes Geopark Project website (www.joycecountrygeoparkproject.ie) as well as on the website of the various heritage societies and initiatives of the local communities. Individual articles – some bilingual as a large part of the area is in the Gaeltacht – will be shared over social media on a daily basis for the duration of National Heritage Week.
    [Show full text]
  • WETLAND PLANTS – Full Species List (English) RECORDING FORM
    WETLAND PLANTS – full species list (English) RECORDING FORM Surveyor Name(s) Pond name Date e.g. John Smith (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 (see your map) e.g. SP 1235 4325 (see your map) METHOD: wetland plants (full species list) survey Survey a single Focal Pond in each 1km square Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value using plants, by recording all wetland plant species present within the pond’s outer boundary. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from the extent of wetland vegetation (for example a ring of rushes growing at the pond’s outer edge), or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. After your survey please enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Stonewort, Bristly (Chara hispida) Bistort, Amphibious (Persicaria amphibia) Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) Stonewort, Clustered (Tolypella glomerata) Crystalwort, Channelled (Riccia canaliculata) Arrowhead, Canadian (Sagittaria rigida) Stonewort, Common (Chara vulgaris) Crystalwort, Lizard (Riccia bifurca) Arrowhead, Narrow-leaved (Sagittaria subulata) Stonewort, Convergent (Chara connivens) Duckweed , non-native sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Retention of Montessori at Cullion, County Westmeath
    Proposed Application for a Greenway Recreation Hub, Grange South, Mullingar, County Westmeath Screening for Appropriate Assessment SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 PREPARED ON BEHALF OF; WESTMEATH COUNTY COUNCIL BY; MAURICE O CONNOR BSC, MSC. SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Maurice O’Connor Appropriate Assessment Screening Report 29th September 2020 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Project Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Requirement for Appropriate Assessment ................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Natura 2000 Sites (European Sites) ................................................................................ 4 1.4 Statement of Authority ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Description of the Proposed Development and Receiving Environment......................................... 6 2.1 Guidance ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ............................................................................. 7 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • The Pitch and Putt Union of Ireland Would Like to the Pitch and Putt
    PITCH AND PUTT UNION OF IRELAND PATRONS VINCENT ALLEN (Cork) JOHN COLEMAN (Cork) JAMES BERMINGHAM (Dublin) EAMONN BIRCHALL (Dublin) THOMAS McGOUGH (Galway) WILLIAM LYNCH (Meath) MYLES McMORROW (Tipperary) PITCH AND PUTT UNION OF IRELAND Irish Sport HQ, National Sports Campus, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15 D15 DY62 Tel: (01) 6251110 Web: www.ppui.ie E-Mail: [email protected] Office Hours: 9 – 1 & 2 - 5 Monday - Friday All correspondence to be addressed to; The Hon. Secretary Pitch and Putt Union of Ireland Irish Sport HQ National Sports Campus Blanchardstown Dublin 15 D15 DY62 Please DO NOT send cash in the post The Pitch and Putt Union of Ireland would like to Thank All the Sponsors who support our Game From Club Level, right through to National LevelLevel.... We would also like to thank all who took advertisementsadvertisements in the Fixture Book. 1 © Copyright Pitch and Putt Union of Ireland 2018 2 © Copyright Pitch and Putt Union of Ireland 2018 NATIONAL 2018 National Entries Qualifying Venues Finals Championship/Competition Close Dates Ladies and Gents National 02/06/18 07/05/18 Tullamore 18/04/18 Matchplay 04/06/18 12/05/18 European Team 22/06/18 Urduña Championship 24/06/18 Ladies National Strokeplay Collins 01/07/18 06/06/18 24/06/18 14/07/18 Gents National Strokeplay Glenville 13/06/18 30/06/18 15/07/18 P.J. & Catherine Bell Seniors 28/07/18 09/07/18 McDonagh 27/06/18 National Championships 29/07/18 14/07/18 28/07/18 09/07/18 Under 16 National Matchplay Kilbeggan 27/06/18 29/07/18 14/07/18 Under 16 National 18/08/18 30/07/18 Fermoy
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 25A)
    Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 25A) Catchment Science & Management Unit Environmental Protection Agency September 2018 Version no. 3 Preface This document provides a summary of the characterisation outcomes for the water resources of the Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment, which have been compiled and assessed by the EPA, with the assistance of local authorities and RPS consultants. The information presented includes status and risk categories of all water bodies, details on protected areas, significant issues, significant pressures, load reduction assessments, recommendations on future investigative assessments, areas for actions and environmental objectives. The characterisation assessments are based on information available to the end of 2015. Additional, more detailed characterisation information is available to public bodies on the EPA WFD Application via the EDEN portal, and more widely on the catchments.ie website. The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the situation in the catchment and help inform further action and analysis of appropriate measures and management strategies. This document is supported by, and can be read in conjunction with, a series of other documents which provide explanations of the elements it contains: 1. An explanatory document setting out the full characterisation process, including water body, subcatchment and catchment characterisation. 2. A published paper on Source Load Apportionment Modelling, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.22 3. A published paper on the role of pathways in transferring nutrients to streams and the relevance to water quality management strategies, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.3318/bioe.2016.19.pdf 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ZNIEFF Continentales : Liste Des Espèces De Flore Déterminantes En Région PACA
    Actualisation de l’inventaire des Zones Naturelles d’Intérêt Écologique, Faunistique et Floristique (ZNIEFF) de Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur ZNIEFF continentales : liste des espèces de flore déterminantes en région PACA Version du 28/07/2016 Référentiel taxonomique : TAXREF v5.0 Les alismatales PHYLUM CLASSE ORDRE FAMILLE CD_REF RANG NOM_VALIDE Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 85486 ES Baldellia ranunculoides (L.) Parl., 1854 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 160264 SSES Damasonium alisma Mill. subsp. polyspermum (Coss.) Maire Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 119860 ES Sagittaria sagittifolia L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Butomaceae 87136 ES Butomus umbellatus L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Hydrocharitaceae 103120 ES Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Hydrocharitaceae 128504 ES Vallisneria spiralis L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Juncaginaceae 141931 SSES Triglochin bulbosum subsp. barrelieri (Loisel.) Rouy, 1912 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Juncaginaceae 127546 ES Triglochin maritimum L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 81869 ES Althenia filiformis Petit, 1829 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115228 ES Potamogeton alpinus Balb., 1804 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115237 ES Potamogeton coloratus Hornem., 1813 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115258 ES Potamogeton gramineus L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115296 ES Potamogeton
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of White-Clawed Crayfish Austropotamobius Pallipes in Irish Lakes in 2007
    Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007 Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 37 2 Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007 William O’Connor 1, Gerard Hayes1, Ciaran O'Keeffe 2 & Deirdre Lynn 2 1Ecofact Environmental Consultants Ltd., Tait Business Centre, Dominic Street, Limerick City. t. +353 61 419477 f. +353 61 414315 e. [email protected] w. www.ecofact.ie 2National Parks and Wildlife Service, 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2 Citation: O’Connor, W., Hayes G., O’Keeffe, C. & Lynn, D. (2009) Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No 37. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin. Cover photo: Surveying for crayfish in Lough Glenade, Co. Sligo ( W. O’Connor). Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 – 6670 SUMMARY • This report outlines the findings of a study of the Annex II listed white-clawed crayfish in 26 selected Irish lakes. The white-clawed crayfish is Ireland’s only crayfish species and Ireland is thought to hold some of the best European stocks of this species, under least threat from external factors. Lake populations of white-clawed crayfish are rare in Britain and across Europe so this adds to Ireland’s unique position in harbouring populations in lime-rich lakes. The current study sought to add to the body of existing knowledge on crayfish stocks in Irish lakes and provide a baseline reference for future studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Buried Alive Aquatic Plants Survive in 'Ghost Ponds' Under Agricultural Fields
    Biological Conservation 212 (2017) 105–110 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Buried alive: Aquatic plants survive in ‘ghost ponds’ under agricultural fields MARK ⁎ Emily Aldertona, ,1, Carl Derek Sayera, Rachael Daviesb, Stephen John Lambertc, Jan Christoph Axmachera a Pond Restoration Research Group, Environmental Change Research Centre (ECRC), Department of Geography, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK b Millennium Seedbank, Kew Royal Botanic Gardens, Ardingly, Sussex RH17 6TN, UK c School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The widespread loss of wetlands due to agricultural intensification has been highlighted as a major threat to Biodiversity aquatic biodiversity. However, all is not lost as we reveal that the propagules of some aquatic species could Palaeoecology survive burial under agricultural fields in the sediments of ‘ghost ponds’ - ponds in-filled during agricultural land Propagules consolidation. Our experiments showed at least eight aquatic macrophyte species to germinate from seeds and Restoration oospores, following 50–150 years of dormancy in the sediments of ghost ponds. This represents a significant Resurrection proportion of the expected macrophyte diversity for local farmland ponds, which typically support between 6 Seed bank and 14 macrophyte species. The rapid (< 6 months) re-colonisation of resurrected ghost ponds by a diverse aquatic vegetation similarly suggests a strong seed-bank influence. Ghost ponds represent abundant, dormant time capsules for aquatic species in agricultural landscapes around the globe, affording opportunities for en- hancing landscape-scale aquatic biodiversity and connectivity. While reports of biodiversity loss through agri- cultural intensification dominate conservation narratives, our study offers a rare positive message, demon- strating that aquatic organisms survive prolonged burial under intensively managed agricultural fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Pondnet RECORDING FORM (PAGE 1 of 5)
    WETLAND PLANTS PondNet RECORDING FORM (PAGE 1 of 5) Your Name Date Pond name (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 e.g. SP 1235 4325 Determiner name (optional) Voucher material (optional) METHOD (complete one survey form per pond) Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value, by recording wetland plants. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from wetland vegetation like rushes at the pond’s outer edge, or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put ’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. Enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ or send your results to Freshwater Habitats Trust. Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Nitella hyalina (Many-branched Stonewort) Floating-leaved species Apium inundatum (Lesser Marshwort) Nitella mucronata (Pointed Stonewort) Azolla filiculoides (Water Fern) Aponogeton distachyos (Cape-pondweed) Nitella opaca (Dark Stonewort) Hydrocharis morsus-ranae (Frogbit) Cabomba caroliniana (Fanwort) Nitella spanioclema (Few-branched Stonewort) Hydrocotyle ranunculoides (Floating Pennywort) Callitriche sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre NBRC Newsletter 20
    Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre The home of quality ecological data in Northamptonshire NBRC Newsletter 20 Autumn/Winter 2020 You have been keeping us wonderfully busy with your submitted records of the species of Northamptonshire; the WILDside Recording Community has been a great home for sightings and support. You have not been stopped in noticing and supporting our local nature - recording in gardens, out on local exercise walks and further afield when restrictions allow. Our website has received over one thousand records, covering over five hundred taxa since the first lockdown began! Many of you will have noticed our website has had a re-vamp of late, shifting Beyond direct website submission, we know you also to the latest platform with SSL security, whilst submit directly to our county recorders (David James retaining all the recording features, ‘look out for’ recently reported over 25,000 butterfly records for surveys and resources to support local recording and 2020!) and via other online channels such as iRecord. ecological reporting. If you aren’t sure of which surveys we receive you can always check our annual report which lists our partners or ask the team [email protected]. Direct record submissions to our website or via our county recorders (as listed on our new resources for recorders page on the website) are generally processed more swiftly as we get all the needed parts and can contact you if required to complete a record. WILDside seems to have inspired us all to expand our recording repertoire. The ever-increasing taxonomic coverage in your submissions is fantastic to see! It seems many have used the wealth of virtual training at our fingertips this year through Wildlife Trust BCN Training Courses, the Field Studies Council and a host of others as can be seen through this wonderfully Thanks to the support of the Environment Agency, we compiled list of resources as put together by the have now launched our latest survey ‘Look out for South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Notes: County Mayo, Ireland
    Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelaeol. Soc., 2014, 26 (2), 185-200 CAVE NOTES: COUNTY MAYO, IRELAND by JACOB PODESTA ABSTRACT Following the 2012 visit, when wet conditions rendered many of the caves inaccessible or dangerous (Hadfield, 2013), a UBSS team visited Co. Mayo again, focusing mainly on the area in and around Cong. The caves visited are described, and new surveys are presented. INTRODUCTION It has been decided to release an updated and extended edition of the book, The Caves of County Clare and South Galway (Mullan, 2003), with additional sections on the caves of the north of Galway and of Co. Mayo in time for the Society’s centenary in 2019. The majority of the new sites are in the Cong area and two visits have so far been conducted by members of the Society, with further visits planned. The notes from the second of these trips are presented below, along with information on Quealy’s Cave, kindly provided by Tony Boycott and Pat Cronin. By linking this work with other information on the caves around Cong it is hoped that a more comprehensive overview of the region can be produced, allowing future efforts to be better directed. Complete surveys have been produced of Wolves’ Hole, Priest’s Hole, Lady’s Buttery, Horse Discovery and Bunnadober Lake Cave. With the exception of Priest’s Hole, which has no accessible water and no diving potential, all these caves have been surveyed up to the start of the diving lines in the hope being that survey data collected for the dry sections of caves can ultimately be linked with data from surveys of the dived sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy Years of Changes in the Abundance of Danish Charophytes
    Freshwater Biology (2013) 58, 1682–1693 doi:10.1111/fwb.12159 Seventy years of changes in the abundance of Danish charophytes LARS BAASTRUP-SPOHR, LARS LØNSMANN IVERSEN, JEPPE DAHL-NIELSEN AND KAJ SAND-JENSEN Freshwater Biological Laboratory, Biological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark SUMMARY 1. Charophytes grow attached to soft bottoms in ponds, streams, lakes and estuaries and are highly threatened throughout Europe according to the national Red Lists. We used Danish studies on fresh- water charophyte distributions conducted around 1940 and repeated measurements during recent years to evaluate the historical development of species richness and dominance patterns. We also tested to what extent historical changes of species abundance in 29 waterbodies were related to landscape features, water quality and species traits. 2. We found that three species of freshwater charophytes (Chara filiformis, Tolypella intricata and Nitella gracilis) have apparently disappeared from Denmark while one species (Chara connivens) has immigrated. National species richness has thus declined from 21 to 19 species. 3. Species abundance based on occurrence in many waterbodies followed a linear rank–log abun- dance relationship both in the historical and the recent studies. The dominance structure was stronger today than historically as common species have become relatively more abundant and uncommon species relatively rarer. 4. Among species traits, perenniality and preference for alkaline waters typical of deep-growing species in large alkaline lakes, a rare contemporary habitat, were significantly related to the historic species decline. Species increasing in abundance had wide tolerances to alkalinity and water nitrogen content. 5. Twenty-nine lakes and ponds studied repeatedly showed a significant decline of mean species richness from 3.4 to 2.4 during the 70 years.
    [Show full text]