Triadica Sebifera

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Triadica Sebifera University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-13-2016 Determining the pollination mechanism of a problematic invasive species in the Gulf South: Triadica sebifera Jennifer Wester Clark University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Forest Management Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Jennifer Wester, "Determining the pollination mechanism of a problematic invasive species in the Gulf South: Triadica sebifera" (2016). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2134. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2134 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Determining the pollination mechanism of a problematic invasive species in the Gulf South: Triadica sebifera A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences by Jennifer Wester Clark B.S. University of New Orleans, 2011 May 2016 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jerome Howard, for his inspiration, advice, and encouragement throughout my project. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Charles Bell and Dr. Philip DeVries, for their guidance and assistance. Thank you to Scott Hereford and staff at the Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge and staff at Tulane University’s F. Edward Hebert Riverside Research Center for assisting me when needed. Many thanks to Dr. Mary Clancy for her microscope expertise and to the undergraduate research assistants I had out in the field, Crista, Brittany, and Becky. Special thanks to my lab mates Cara Nighohossian, Lizzie Ruffman, and Robinson Sudan, and fellow graduate students Lauren Gonzalez, Catie Policastro, and Trent Santonastaso for all of their knowledge and encouragement. Lastly, thank you to my wonderful family for their love and encouragement, especially my husband for his support and patience. ii Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Invasive Species .......................................................................................................................... 1 Triadica sebifera characteristics .................................................................................................. 2 Triadica sebifera as an invasive species in the U.S. ................................................................... 4 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 7 Study sites ................................................................................................................................... 7 Sampling design .......................................................................................................................... 9 Self-fertilization survey .............................................................................................................. 9 Receptivity survey .................................................................................................................... 10 Airborne pollen count ............................................................................................................... 11 Insect pollination survey ........................................................................................................... 11 Insect identification ................................................................................................................... 12 Pollen identification .................................................................................................................. 12 Statistical analysis ..................................................................................................................... 12 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Self-fertilization survey ............................................................................................................ 14 Receptivity survey .................................................................................................................... 14 Airborne pollen count ............................................................................................................... 15 Insect pollination survey and identification .............................................................................. 16 Pollen identification .................................................................................................................. 18 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 19 References ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Receptivity Data........................................................................................................................ 30 Insect Identification .................................................................................................................. 30 Vita ................................................................................................................................................ 34 iii List of Figures Figure 1: Range of T. sebifera in the U.S. ...................................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Map of Tulane University's F. Edward Hebert Riverside Research Center .................... 8 Figure 3: Map of Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge........................................ 9 Figure 4: Bagged inflorescence .................................................................................................... 10 Figure 5: Tagged inflorescence post- exposure ............................................................................ 11 Figure 6: Pollen trap...................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7: Pollen grains vs. distance from source tree ................................................................... 16 iv List of Tables Table 1: Proportion of fruits developed per test tree in self-fertilization survey .......................... 14 Table 2: Repeated measured ANOVA of fruit set among trees over time ................................... 15 Table 3: Number of pollen grains per microscope field for two trees at varying distances ......... 15 Table 4: Comparison of abundance of taxa visiting at two sites. ................................................. 17 Table 5: Species diversity by order and bee family at both sites .................................................. 18 Table 6: Mean and standard deviation of 5 field views of pollen loads per group ....................... 18 Table 7: Numbers of fruits developed in receptivity exclusion experiment ................................. 30 Table 8: Arthropods collected (ms stands for morphospecies) ..................................................... 30 v Abstract Understanding the ecology of invasive species is vital to curb the homogenizing of ecosystems, yet the pollination mechanisms of the Chinese tallow tree (Triadica sebifera) in its introduced habitat remain ambiguous. This study examines self-pollination, wind pollination, and flower- visiting insects of tallow in a bottomland hardwood forest and Longleaf pine savannah in the U.S. Gulf South. These data suggest that self-pollination and airborne pollination are possible, but likely rare occurrences, although the possibility of apoxisis was not investigated. Seed production in exclusion experiments was significantly less than in open-pollinated flowers, and wind dispersal of tallow pollen dropped to essentially zero 8 meters from the source. Results show that tallow is primarily bee pollinated, with external pollen loads of Apis, Melissodes, and halictids visiting
Recommended publications
  • Feedstock List (As of 3/2018)
    Feedstock List (as of 3/2018) FOG: Fats / Oils / Greases Wastes / Oil Seeds Algae / Aquatic Species Industrial Aloe (Aloe vera) Meadowfoam (Limnanthes alba) Brown grease Cyanobacteria Babassu (Attalea speciosa) Mustard (Sinapis alba) Crude glycerine Halophytes (e.g., Salicornia bigelovii) *Camelina (Camelina sativa)* Nuts Fish oil Lemna (Lemna spp.) *Canola, winter (Brassica napus[occasionally rapa Olive (Olea europaea) Industrial effluent (palm) Macroalgae or campestris])* *Carinata (Brassica carinata)* Palm (Elaeis guineensis) Shrimp oil (Caridea) Mallow (Malva spp.) Castor (Ricinus communis) Peanut, Cull (Arachis hypogaea) Tall oil pitch Microalgae Citrus (Citron spp.) Pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) Tallow / Lard Spirodela (Spirodela polyrhiza) Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Pongamia (Millettia pinnata) White grease Wolffia (Wolffia arrhiza) Corn, inedible (Zea mays) Poppy (Papaver rhoeas) Waste vegetable oil Cottonseed (Gossypium) *Rapeseed (Brassica napus)* Yellow grease Croton megalocarpus Oryza sativa Croton ( ) Rice Bran ( ) Cuphea (Cuphea viscossisima) Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Flax / Linseed (Linum usitatissimum) Sesame (Sesamum indicum) Gourds / Melons (Cucumis melo) Soybean (Glycine max) Grapeseed (Vitis vinifera) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Hemp seeds (Cannabis sativa) Tallow tree (Triadica sebifera) Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) Calophyllum inophyllum Kamani ( ) Lesquerella (Lesquerella fenderi) Cellulose Woody Grasses Residues Other Types: Arundo (Arundo donax) Bagasse
    [Show full text]
  • Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop
    Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-native No. of individuals/abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliopsis andreniformis Mining bee 5 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Apis millifera European honey bee X 20 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus griseocollis Brown belted bumble bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus impatiens Common eastern bumble bee 12 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina calcarata Small carpenter bee 9 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina mikmaqi Small carpenter bee 4 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina strenua Small carpenter bee 10 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Melissodes druriella Small carpenter bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Xylocopa virginica Eastern carpenter bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus affinis masked face bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus mesillae masked face bee 3 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus modestus masked face bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon virescens Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochlora pura Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochloropsis metallica metallica Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus confusus Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus ligatus Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum anomalum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum ellissiae Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum laevissimum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum platyparium Cuckoo sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum versatum Sweat bee 6 Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Agonum sp. A ground beetle
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy and Invasive Plants: Quantifying and Mitigating Future Risks
    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2014 7:199–209 Bioenergy and Invasive Plants: Quantifying and Mitigating Future Risks Jacob N. Barney* The United States is charging toward the largest expansion of agriculture in 10,000 years with vast acreages of primarily exotic perennial grasses planted for bioenergy that possess many traits that may confer invasiveness. Cautious integration of these crops into the bioeconomy must be accompanied by development of best management practices and regulation to mitigate the risk of invasion posed by this emerging industry. Here I review the current status of United States policy drivers for bioenergy, the status of federal and state regulation related to invasion mitigation, and survey the scant quantitative literature attempting to quantify the invasive potential of bioenergy crops. A wealth of weed risk assessments are available on exotic bioenergy crops, and generally show a high risk of invasion, but should only be a first-step in quantifying the risk of invasion. The most information exists for sterile giant miscanthus, with preliminary empirical studies and demographic models suggesting a relatively low risk of invasion. However, most important bioenergy crops are poorly studied in the context of invasion risk, which is not simply confined to the production field; but also occurs in crop selection, harvest and transport, and feedstock storage. Thus, I propose a nested-feedback risk assessment (NFRA) that considers the entire bioenergy supply chain and includes the broad components of weed risk assessment, species distribution models, and quantitative empirical studies. New information from the NFRA is continuously fed back into other components to further refine the risk assessment; for example, empirical dispersal kernels are utilized in landscape-level species distribution models, which inform habitat invasibility studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillingia: a Newly Recorded Genus of Euphorbiaceae from China
    Phytotaxa 296 (2): 187–194 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.296.2.8 Stillingia: A newly recorded genus of Euphorbiaceae from China SHENGCHUN LI1, 2, BINGHUI CHEN1, XIANGXU HUANG1, XIAOYU CHANG1, TIEYAO TU*1 & DIANXIANG ZHANG1 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract Stillingia (Euphorbiaceae) contains ca. 30 species from Latin America, the southern United States, and various islands in the tropical Pacific and in the Indian Ocean. We report here for the first time the occurrence of a member of the genus in China, Stillingia lineata subsp. pacifica. The distribution of the genus in China is apparently narrow, known only from Pingzhou and Wanzhou Islands of the Wanshan Archipelago in the South China Sea, which is close to the Pearl River estuary. This study updates our knowledge on the geographic distribution of the genus, and provides new palynological data as well. Key words: Island, Hippomaneae, South China Sea, Stillingia lineata Introduction During the last decade, hundreds of new plant species or new species records have been added to the flora of China. Nevertheless, newly described or newly recorded plant genera are not discovered and reported very often, suggesting that botanical expedition and plant survey at the generic level may be advanced in China. As far as we know, only six and eight angiosperm genera respectively have been newly described or newly recorded from China within the last ten years (Qiang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Wedge-Shaped Beetles (Suggested Common Name) Ripiphorus Spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N
    EENY613 Wedge-Shaped Beetles (suggested common name) Ripiphorus spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N. Mortensen, Jeanette Klopchin, William Kern, and Jamie D. Ellis2 Introduction Ripiphoridae are a family of unusual parasitic beetles that are thought to be related to tumbling flower beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae) and blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). There is disagreement over the spelling of the family (Ripiphoridae) and genus (Ripiphorus) names. Here we use the original spelling that starts with only the letter Figure 1. Adult specimens of the two genera of Ripiphoridae. A) “R”; however, an initial “Rh” has also been used in the Macrosiagon Hentz, and B) Ripiphorus Bosc. scientific community (Rhipiphoridae and Rhipiphorus). Credits: Allen M. Boatman There are an estimated 35 nearctic species of Ripiphorus, Generally, the biology of the family Ripiphoridae is poorly two of which have been collected in Florida: Ripiphorus known. Ripiphorids parasitize bees and wasps (Hymenop- schwarzi LeConte (Figure 2A) and Ripiphorus fasciatus Say tera), roaches (Blattodea), and wood-boring beetles (Co- (Figure 2B). Due to limited information for both of these leoptera). However, the specific hosts for many ripiphorid species, the information presented below is characteristic species are unknown. Furthermore, only one sex (either of the genus Ripiphorus. Information specific to Ripiphorus male or female) has been described for several species, and fasciatus and Ripiphorus schwarzi is presented where the males and females of some species look different. detailed information is available. Two genera of Ripiphoridae infest hymenopteran (bee and wasp) nests: Macrosiagon Hentz (Figure 1A) and Ripiphorus Bosc (formerly Myodites Latreille) (Figure 1B). Species of Macrosiagon are parasites of a variety of hymenopteran families including: Halictidae, Vespidae, Tiphiidae, Apidae, Pompilidae, Crabronidae, and Sphecidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing a Wild NYC: a K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum Was Made Possible Through the Generous Support of Our Funders
    A K-5 URBAN POLLINATOR CURRICULUM Growing a Wild NYC LESSON 1: HABITAT HUNT The National Wildlife Federation Uniting all Americans to ensure wildlife thrive in a rapidly changing world Through educational programs focused on conservation and environmental knowledge, the National Wildlife Federation provides ways to create a lasting base of environmental literacy, stewardship, and problem-solving skills for today’s youth. Growing a Wild NYC: A K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum was made possible through the generous support of our funders: The Seth Sprague Educational and Charitable Foundation is a private foundation that supports the arts, housing, basic needs, the environment, and education including professional development and school-day enrichment programs operating in public schools. The Office of the New York State Attorney General and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation through the Greenpoint Community Environmental Fund. Written by Nina Salzman. Edited by Sarah Ward and Emily Fano. Designed by Leslie Kameny, Kameny Design. © 2020 National Wildlife Federation. Permission granted for non-commercial educational uses only. All rights reserved. September - January Lesson 1: Habitat Hunt Page 8 Lesson 2: What is a Pollinator? Page 20 Lesson 3: What is Pollination? Page 30 Lesson 4: Why Pollinators? Page 39 Lesson 5: Bee Survey Page 45 Lesson 6: Monarch Life Cycle Page 55 Lesson 7: Plants for Pollinators Page 67 Lesson 8: Flower to Seed Page 76 Lesson 9: Winter Survival Page 85 Lesson 10: Bee Homes Page 97 February
    [Show full text]
  • Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1988
    - Annals v,is(i- of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1988 # Volume 75 Number 1 Volume 75, Number ' Spring 1988 The Annals, published quarterly, contains papers, primarily in systematic botany, con- tributed from the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. Papers originating outside the Garden will also be accepted. Authors should write the Editor for information concerning arrangements for publishing in the ANNALS. Instructions to Authors are printed on the inside back cover of the last issue of each volume. Editorial Committee George K. Rogers Marshall R. Crosby Editor, Missouri B Missouri Botanical Garden Editorial is. \I,,S ouri Botanu •al Garde,, John I). Dwyer Missouri Botanical Garden Saint Louis ( niversity Petei • Goldblatt A/I.S.S ouri Botanic al Garder Henl : van der W< ?rff V//.S.S ouri Botanic tor subscription information contact Department IV A\NM.S OK Tin: Missot m Boi >LM« M G\KDE> Eleven, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166. Sub- (ISSN 0026-6493) is published quarterly by the scription price is $75 per volume U.S., $80 Canada Missouri Botanical Garden, 2345 Tower Grove Av- and Mexico, $90 all other countries. Airmail deliv- enue, St. Louis, MO 63110. Second class postage ery charge, $35 per volume. Four issues per vol- paid at St. Louis, MO and additional mailing offices. POSTMAS'IKK: Send ad«lrt— changes to Department i Botanical Garden 1988 REVISED SYNOPSIS Grady L. Webster2 and Michael J. Huft" OF PANAMANIAN EUPHORBIACEAE1 ABSTRACT species induded in \ • >,H The new taxa ai I. i i " I ! I _- i II • hster, Tragia correi //,-," |1 U !.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Tree (Triadica Sebifera)
    THE WEEDY TRUTH ABOUT BIOFUELS TIM LOW & CAROL BOOTH Invasive Species Council October 2007 Title: The Weedy Truth About Biofuels Authors: Tim Low & Carol Booth Published by the Invasive Species Council, Melbourne October 2007 Updated March 2008 The INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL is a non-government organisation that works to protect the Australian environment from invasive pest species. Address: PO Box 166, Fairfield, Vic 3078 Email: [email protected] Website: www.invasives.org.au Further copies of this report can be obtained from the ISC website at www.invasives.org.au Cover photo: Spartina alterniflora, by the US Department of Agriculture CCOONNTTEENNTTSS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 What are biofuels? ................................................................................................................ 2 The Biofuel industry .............................................................................................................. 4 The problems with biofuels ................................................................................................ 6 Social and economic issues ............................................................................................ 6 Greenhouse issues ............................................................................................................ 7 Biodiversity issues ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Proposal
    BCIP Project Proposal 1. Project title: Biological control of Chinese tallow: Measuring changes in plant demography and local plant communities in Louisiana 2. Principal Investigators: Drs. Rodrigo Diaz1, Gregory S. Wheeler2. 1Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, 402 Life Sciences Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803, 225-578-1835 (phone), 225-578-1643 (fax), [email protected]; 2 Invasive Plant Laboratory, USDA, Fort Lauderdale, FL 3. Cooperators: Wood Johnson, USDA Forest Service; William deGravelles, Nature Conservancy; and Julie Whitbeck, National Park Service. BCIP Contact from Region 8: Michelle Frank, Entomologist, Pesticide Use and Invasive Plant Programs USDA Forest Service 1720 Peachtree Road, NW, Atlanta, GA 30309; [email protected] 4. Amount requested: $50,400 5. Project goal: To develop approaches to assess the impact of biological control of Chinese tallow in Louisiana. Because the flea beetle, Bikasha collaris (Baly) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), could be released in the near future, it is critical to quantify the before and after infestation levels of Chinese tallow and presence of native plants. We expect this information to help in the development of effective management programs against invasive plants and support future restoration efforts. The supporting objectives are: Establish long-term monitoring plots of Chinese tallow Quantify changes in Chinese tallow demographics before and after the release of B. collaris Measure the impact of local herbivores and plant pathogens on Chinese tallow saplings 6. Project Justification Chinese tallow, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small (Euphorbiaceae) is a rapidly-growing, invasive tree in the United States (Bruce et al. 1997, Jubinsky and Anderson 1996). Native to southern China, Taiwan and northern Vietnam (Pattison 2008), this tree was first introduced to US in late 1700s (Bell 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management Lauren Susan Pile Clemson University
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2015 Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management Lauren Susan Pile Clemson University Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Pile, Lauren Susan, "Chinese Tallow Invasion in Maritime Forests: Understand Invasion Mechanism and Develop Ecologically-Based Management" (2015). All Dissertations. 1807. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1807 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHINESE TALLOW INVASION IN MARITIME FORESTS: UNDERSTAND INVASION MECHANISM AND DEVELOP ECOLOGICALLY-BASED MANAGEMENT A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Forest Resources by Lauren Susan Pile December 2015 Accepted by: G. Geoff Wang, Committee Chair William C. Bridges Jr. Patricia A. Layton Thomas A. Waldrop Joan L. Walker ABSTRACT Invasion by highly aggressive, non-native, invasive plants is a significant threat to management and conservation priorities as these plants can transform ecosystem functions and processes. In this study, I investigated the non-native, invasive tree, Chinese tallow
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Repeated Prescribed Fire and Thinning on Bees, Wasps, and Other Flower Visitors in the Understory and Midstory of a Temperate Forest in North Carolina
    For. Sci. 00(00):1–8 APPLIED RESEARCH doi: 10.1093/forsci/fxx008 Copyright © 2018 Society of American Foresters forest management The Effects of Repeated Prescribed Fire and Thinning on Bees, Wasps, and Other Flower Visitors in the Understory and Midstory of a Temperate Forest in North Carolina Joshua W. Campbell1, Patrick A. Vigueira2, Cynthia C. Viguiera2, and Cathryn H. Greenberg3 We investigated the effects of repeated prescribed fire, mechanical thinning, and combinations of fire and mechanical thinning on pollinators and flower visitors within the herbaceous understory and midstory of a temperate forest in North Carolina. Using colored pan traps, we sampled flower visitors during the plant growing season between 2014 and 2016. We captured 5,520 flower visitors that were dominated by halictid bees and vespid wasps. Twenty genera of bees representing at least 30 species were captured within our experimental plots. Within the forest understory, we found higher abundances and diversities of bees and other flower visitors within plots that had been treated with prescribed fire or a combination of mechanical thinning and prescribed fire compared to control plots. Within our midstory samples, we found that forest manage- ment practices did not affect the abundance of any common flower visitor species/family. However,Augochlora pura and Vespula spp. were more abundant in the midstory compared to the forest understory. Overall, our study demonstrates that repeated applications of prescribed fire maintained elevated abundances and diversity of bees and other flower-visiting insects compared to untreated plots, likely due to increased herbaceous plant diversity and enhanced quality of nesting habitat within the understory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Invasive Species Update
    Quiet Invasion: 2020 Invasive Species Update Lisa Gonzalez Invasive Species: The Continuing Problem • New species being reported • Invasive species management is multi‐ faceted and long‐term • Few eradication success stories Policy Research Management Education & & Awareness Restoration What We Know Common Characteristics Impacts • fast seed germination • nutrient cycling • high population growth • local hydrology • early reproductive maturity • fire regimes • reproduction vegetatively as well as sexually • geomorphological processes (such as dune formation or stream profile) • generalized pollination • species and structural diversity • wide tolerance to many habitat types • disease • adaptation to disturbance • impacts available wildlife resources • high rate of biomass accumulation • prevents recruitment of native species due to • long‐range seed dispersal capabilities competition for light, nutrients, and/or moisture • fruit used by wildlife (including humans) • economic losses and costs • relative lack of predators or diseases in • sense of place and quality of life present location Pathways of Introduction • Landscaping and horticulture • Mowing equipment and soils • Shipping materials • Aquarium trade and aquarists • Shipping and boating • Agriculture and livestock • Internet sales • Live seafood markets, bait • Biological control • Scientific research institutions, public aquaria, zoos, arboreta, wildlife preserves Longstanding Invaders • Giant reed Arundo donax • Yellow bluestem Bothriochloa ischaemum • Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera
    [Show full text]