Was the Primitive Hut Actually a Temple?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WAS THE PRIMITIVE HUT ACTUALLV A TEMPLE? THE IMPACT OF RECENT ARCHAEOLOCICAL EXCAVATIONS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL THEORY OF THE PRIMITIVE HUT lvica Brnic Excavations ofCöbekli Tepe (earliest phase between 12,000 and 11,000 years old). Drawing after a reconstruction by Fernando Baptista in '"Building Cöbekli Tepe'", National Geographie (June 2011) Up until now, the birth of permanent architecture has always been See Patrick Nuttgens, Die associated with the so-called Neolithic revolution, meaning the gradual Geschichte der Architektur (Berlin: Phaidon Verlag , transition after 9,000 BC from a hunter-and-gatherer society to a set 2010), 16. tled way of life based on agriculture and livestock breeding. 1 Since the 1995 excavation of a site of worship of monumental 2 Klaus Schmidt, '"Cöbekli dimensions on the mountain of Göbekli Tepe, 2 this thesis cannot Tepe - the Stone Age be sustained anymore, or at least not exclusively. The oldest parts of Sanctuaries: New Results of ongoing Excavations with a this site were built between 10,000 and 9,000 BC, which is before the Special Focus on Sculptures Neolithic shift from an economyofforagers to one ofproduction. The and High Reliefs'", Documenta size of the site, defined as a cult site, is evidence of a highly organized Praehistorica 34 (2010). society. 3 3 The Vitruvian theory of the origin of architecture, which argues See Klaus Schmidt, Sie bauten die ersten Tempel architecture's derivation from a shelter, had been scientifically 32 bolstered by the earlier excavations of the larger Neolithic settlements (Munich: DTV Deutscher 4 Taschenbuch, 2008); Klaus ofJericho and <;atalhöyük. Butin the lightofGöbekli Tepe, the theory Schmidt, "Die steinernen that architecture originated from the need for protection against the Geister von Cöbekli Tepe", asperities of nature must be revised. Furthermore, the uncritical way Epoc dossier (2008), 6; Clemens Lichter, Vor 12.000 in which we have thus far accepted that architecture was born from Jahren in Anatolien: Die the activity to provide shelter must be interrogated. ältesten Monumente der Menschheit (Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag, 2007), From Dwelling to Building 74. The conventional argument that architecture grew out of people build 4 ing shelter from external conditions has been reiterated in numerous See Seton Lloyd, Hans interpretations grew out of Vitruvius's metaphor of the primitive Wolfgang Müller and hut, 5 including those of Filarete, Violet-le-Duc, Sem per and especially Roland Martin, Architektur der frühen Hochkulturen Laugier, with its pragmatic focus. 6 Until today, most history of archi - Vorderasien - Ägypten tecture textbooks that offer insight into the early periods of architec - Griechenland, 1st ed. (Stuttgart I Milan: Belser I ture derive primitive buildings from pragmatic constructions built Electa, 1976), 9. purposefully by nomadic hunters and gatherers. 7 Artificial stone circles, interpreted as the remains of temporary 5 Vitruvius, Zehn Bücher über habitations, can be found as far back as the Old Stone Age. About Architektur: De Architectura 1.8 million years ago, temporary dwellings were built with branch Libri Decem (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche es secured by stones. 8 The oldest find of this kind in Europe is over Buchgesellschaft, 1991), 600,000 years old and was found in Prezletice near Prague. 9 Similar 79-81. finds - whose dating, however, is still being disputed - are those of 6 10 Terra Amata near Nice, estimated as being 380,000-230,000 years old, Marc-Antoine Laugier, Essai and Bilzingsleben, thought to be around 370,000 years old.11These sur l'architecture (Paris, primitive constructions therefore go back even to the age before the 1753), 10-15; consulted online at http completion of the full development of Homo sapiens. Naturally, in ://arch ive.org/detai ls those days the hominids, who were foragers, used to live nomadically. /essaisurlarchiteOOlaug. 7 See Karl Otto Hartmann, Die Baukunst in ihrer Entwicklung von der Urzeit bis zur Gegenwart: Die Baukunst des Altertums und Findings in Prezletice (over 600,000 years old). Drawing after a reconstruction in Jan Fridrich and lvana Frid richova-Sykorova, "Pi'ezletice u Prahy - Sidlisti' Nasich Davnych Pi'edki'" (n.d.) 33 Mezhyrich construction of mammoth bones (about 15,000 years old). Drawing after a reconstruction by the Natural History Museum ofKiev Although some of the sites were inhabited repeatedly or periodically, they cannot be defined as permanent settlements. 12 Of special interest are the numerous tents built using mammoth des Islams (Leipzig: Scholtze, bones between 27,000and 15,000 BC in the plains ofDnjepr in Ukraine. 1931), 1; Mate Major, Avery good example is a construction found in Mezhyrich. The compo Geschichte der Architektur (Berlin: Henschelverlag, nents of the structure were heavy and thus hardly transportable, and 1957), 15-28; Lloyd, Müller, so the structure would not have been worth making for only short-term and Martin, Architektur der frühen Hochkulturen, use. Here again it is assumed that the same constructions were used 9; Jonathan Clancey, Die periodically.13Some clusters of constructions are composed of the bones Geschichte der Architektur of several hundred mammoths that were carefully assembled and piled (Munich: Dorling Kindersley, 2006), 9. up, and they display considerable aesthetic features. This building technique is usually explained as the result of a shortage ofwood and 8 an abundance of available mammoth bones. However, a retrospective Sophie de Beaune , ··Aux Origines de la construction", lookat the uneconomical construction technique ofthe assemblage of in E:dificeet ortifice: Histoires bones (because they still need a wooden frame), the quantity ofbones constructives - Premier Congres froncophone needed in relation to the size of the social group benefiting from the d'histoire de /a construction, construction and even the aesthetic value of the latter, which should Paris, 19- 21 Juin 2008 (Paris: not be ignored, raises some questions about how the bone buildings Archeologies et Sciences de l'Antiquit e, 2010), 77-89. could actually have been used by a nomadic population of hunters. Seen from a pragmatic per sp ective, the nomadic building activity 9 Jan Fridri ch and lvana developed through the Neolithic revolution into a repeated use ofthe Fridrichovä-Sykorovä, same territory. This led to a stabilization ofthe temporary dwelling, "Plezletice u Prahy- Sidlistr through the repetitive rebuilding of temporary accommodations for Nasich Oävnych Pledkl" (n.d.l. ever longer periods of time, into a fixed construction, making the development of permanent architecture progress _ 10 For the earlier estimated The economic shift from hunting and gathering to agriculture and date , see Henry de Lumley, livestock breeding took place in the Near East around 9,000 to 8,000 Grande Histoire des premiers Be.••The most meaningful factor in this evolution was the emergence hommes europeens (La) (Odile Jacob, 2007), 225; for of sedentism. This can be determined by considering the relation the later one , see Paola Villa , betwe en the growth of the population and the shortage of regenerating 34 natural resources. The next step in this development was the birth of Terra Amata and the Middle villages and towns. Two places are especially known for their early Pleistocene Archoeologica/ Record o(Southern France 15 dating: <;:atalhöyük, from 7,400 BC, is considered one ofthe earliest (Berkeley: University of settlements found in Anatolia , and Jericho, the oldest town to have California Press, 1983), 303 . been excavated to date. In Jericho the first traces ofhuman presence 11 can be dated to even earlierthan 9,000 BC. After beinginhabited and Emil Hoffmann, Lexikon der subsequently abandoned several times, it developed into a settlement Steinzeit (Berlin: BoD - Books on Demand, 2012), 211-12. only much later around 8,350 to 7,370 BC. The construction of a for tifying wall during this phase made Jericho seem like a proper town, 12 the oldest known in the world. See de Beaune, "Aux origines de la construction". From Worship to Building 13 See ibid. However, in the light of the even older settlements revealed by recent excavations by archaeologist Klaus Schmidt on the Anatolian moun 14 tain Göbekli Tepe, one can question the ontological deduction pro Lichter, Vor 12.000Jahren in Anatolien, 52. posing that the origins of permanent architecture Iie in the shift in man's maintenance economy. Göbekli Tepe is an archaeological site 15 lbid., 124. dating back in its first phase to between 10,000 and 9,000 BC. lt is comprised of about twenty circular structures made ofT-shaped stone 16 pillars that measure between 5 and 6 metres high and are partially Schmidt, "Cöbekli Tepe". adorned with relief carvings of wild animal motifs, some of which 17 display anthropomorphic elements such as human arms. 16 In regard Schmidt, Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. to Göbekli Tepe we can clearly talk about permanent architecture, for its structures endured two thousand years and represent the oldest 18 solid, preserved ones of this magnitude yet discovered. Although they See Oliver Dietrich et al., "The Role ofCult and constitute an exception, their size and technical achievements make Feasting in the Emergence it appropriate to assume that other similar constructions were built ofNeolithi c Communities: New Evidence from Cöbekli in the same period. 17 Tepe, South-eastern Turkey", What is significant in the case of the Göbekli Tepe site is not only Antiquity 86 (2012) , 674 - 95. its dating, but even more so the fact that the excavations did not reveal See also Klaus Schmidt, "Die ersten Tempel: Die anytrace ofthe usual activities oftypical settlements in the surround steinernen Geister von ing area. The archaeological evidence is characterized by extraordi Cöbekli Tepe - Epoc", Epoc nary monumental and symbolic content. The findings indicate the 1 (2007). mounting oflavish feasts. This fact lead s us to interpret the megalithic structure as a place of worship,' 8 although the exact circumstances of the ritual acts cannot be reconstructed.