550 Subpart L—Transit Air Cargo Manifest (TACM) Procedures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

§ 122.102 19 CFR Ch. I (4–1–01 Edition) (a) Submit their baggage to Customs and thereafter by air or surface move- for inspection; or ment to the port of destination. (b) Arrange with the importing car- (d) Transit air cargo manifest. ‘‘Transit rier for the baggage to be processed air cargo manifest’’ is used in this sub- under regular in-transit procedures. part as the shortened title for the transportation entry and transit air When passengers choose not to have ac- cargo manifest. cess to their baggage while in the U.S., the baggage shall be listed on the Air § 122.113 Form for transit air cargo Cargo Manifest as provided in § 122.48. manifest procedures. § 122.102 Inspection of baggage in A manifest on Customs Form 7509 is transit. required for transit air cargo, as pro- vided in § 122.48(c) of this part. The (a) General baggage in transit may be words ‘‘Transportation Entry and inspected upon arrival, while in tran- Transit Air Cargo Manifest’’ shall be sit, and upon exportation. Carriers printed, stamped or marked on the shall present in-transit baggage for in- form and on all copies of the form re- spection at any time found necessary quired for transit air cargo movement. by the port director. (b) In-transit baggage shall be pre- § 122.114 Contents. sented to a Customs officer for inspec- (a) Form duplicates original manifest. tion and clearance before the baggage Each transit air cargo manifest shall can be delivered to a passenger while in be a duplicate of the sheet presented as the U.S. part of the cargo manifest for the air- craft on which the cargo arrived in the Subpart L—Transit Air Cargo U.S. Manifest (TACM) Procedures (b) Shipments shown on manifest—(1) Country of exportation. Each transit air § 122.111 Application. cargo manifest sheet may list: Cargo (including manifested baggage) (i) Only air cargo shipments from one which arrives and is transported under exporting country, with the name of Customs control in, through, or from, the country shown in the heading; or the U.S. may be transported in bond (ii) Air cargo shipments from several under this subpart. If cargo is not exporting countries, with the name of transported under this subpart, it shall the exporting country shown in the be transported under other provisions ‘‘Nature of Goods’’ column. of this chapter. (See subparts I and J of (2) Shipment to same port. Each transit this part, and parts 18 and 123 of this air manifest sheet may list only those chapter.) shipments manifested by way of the port of arrival for: § 122.112 Definitions. (i) The same Customs port of destina- tion; The following definitions apply in (ii) The same Customs port for later this subpart: exportation; or (a) Transit air cargo. ‘‘Transit air (iii) Direct exportation from the port cargo’’ is cargo, including manifested of arrival. baggage, transported under the re- (c) Information required. Each air quirements of this subpart. cargo manifest sheet shall show: (b) Port of arrival. The ‘‘port of ar- (1) The foreign port of lading; rival’’ is the port in the U.S. where im- (2) The date the aircraft arrived at ported cargo must be documented for the port of arrival; further transportation under this sub- (3) Each U.S. port where Customs part. services will be necessary due to tran- (c) Transfer or transferred. ‘‘Transfer sit air cargo procedures; and or transferred’’ means the change of (4) The final port of destination in documentation of cargo to transit air the U.S., or the foreign country of des- cargo for transportation. The terms tination, for each shipment. The for- also include the physical movement of eign country destination shown on the the cargo from one carrier to another, manifest must be the final destination, 550 VerDate 11<MAY>2000 01:24 Apr 17, 2001 Jkt 194056 PO 00000 Frm 00550 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\194056T.XXX pfrm06 PsN: 194056T United States Customs Service, Treasury § 122.117 as shown by airline shipping docu- shall be given. The receipt shall be ments, even though airline transport made by the airline responsible for may be scheduled to end before the transport or export within the general shipment arrives at the final destina- order period (see § 122.50). tion. (2) Contents. The receipt shall appear (d) Corrections. If corrections in the on each copy of the transit air cargo route shown on the original manifest manifest, clearly signed and dated if for the cargo are required at the port of required, in the following form: arrival to make a manifest sheet work- able as a transit air cargo manifest, Received the cargo listed herein for deliv- ery to Customs at the port of destination or the director of the port of arrival may exportation shown above, or for direct expor- allow the corrections. tation. § 122.115 Labeling of cargo. llllllllllllllllllllllll Name of carrier (or exporter) A warning label, as required by llllllllllllllllllllllll § 18.4(e) of this chapter, shall be at- Attorney or agent of carrier (or exporter) tached to all transit air cargo not di- llllllllllllllllllllllll rectly exported from the port of arrival Date before the cargo leaves the port of ar- rival. (c) Responsibility for transit air cargo— (1) Direct exportation. The responsibility § 122.116 Identification of manifest of the airline exporting transit air sheets. cargo for direct exportation begins When the original cargo manifest for when a receipt, as provided in para- the aircraft on which the cargo arrives graph (b) of this section, is presented is presented by the aircraft commander to Customs. or its authorized agent at the port of (2) Other than direct exportation. When arrival, a manifest number will be the transit air cargo is not for direct given to the aircraft entry documents exportation, the responsibility of the by Customs. The number given shall be airline receiving the cargo begins when used by the airline to identify all cop- a receipt, as provided in paragraph (b) ies of the transit air cargo manifest. of this section, is presented to Cus- All copies of the manifest shall be cor- toms. rectly numbered before cargo will be (3) Carting. When carting is used to released from the port of arrival as deliver transit air cargo to receiving transit air cargo. airlines, the importing airline is re- sponsible for the cargo under its own § 122.117 Requirements for transit air bond until a receipt is filed by the re- cargo transport. ceiving airline. This does not apply (a) Transportation—(1) Port to port. when the carting is done under part 112 Transit air cargo may be carried to an- of this chapter, at the expense of the other port only when a receipt is given, parties involved. as provided in paragraph (b) of this sec- (4) Importing airlines. An importing tion. The receipt may be given only to airline which has qualified as a carrier an airline which: of bonded merchandise, whether reg- (i) Is a common carrier for the trans- istered in the U.S. or a foreign area, portation of bonded merchandise; and may: (ii) Has the required Customs bond on (i) Give a receipt for the air cargo; file. (ii) File an appropriate bond; and (2) Exportation from port of arrival. (iii) Deliver the cargo to an author- Transit air cargo may be exported from ized domestic carrier for in-bond trans- the port of arrival only if covered by a portation from the port of arrival. The bond on Customs Form 301, containing importing carrier’s bond covers the the bond conditions set forth in sub- transportation. part G of part 113 of this chapter, as (d) Split shipments. A receipt shall be provided in § 18.25 of this chapter. given by one airline for all of the cargo (b) Receipt—(1) Requirements. When shipments listed on one transit air air cargo is to move from the port of cargo manifest sheet. Cargo shipments arrival as transit air cargo, a receipt so listed shall be transported from the 551 VerDate 11<MAY>2000 01:24 Apr 17, 2001 Jkt 194056 PO 00000 Frm 00551 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\194056T.XXX pfrm06 PsN: 194056T § 122.118 19 CFR Ch. I (4–1–01 Edition) port of arrival on one aircraft or car- listed on one aircraft transit air cargo rier unless the use of more than one manifest sheet may be directly ex- aircraft or carrier would be allowed: ported on different aircraft of the ex- (1) By § 122.92(d) under a single com- porting airline. If this occurs, two addi- bined entry and manifest; tional copies of the transit air cargo (2) By § 122.118(d); or manifest shall be filed for each ship- (3) By § 122.119(e), permitting the use ment or group of shipments trans- of a surface carrier for transport. ported in other aircraft. Each copy of Otherwise, all shipments on the transit the transit air cargo manifest shall be air cargo manifest shall be separately clearly marked to show which ship- documented and transported under the ment or shipments listed are covered regular procedures for transportation by the manifest copy. of merchandise in bond (See subpart J). (e) Direct export by another airline. If [T.D. 88–12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as shipments listed on one transit air amended by T.D. 98–74, 63 FR 51289, Sept. 25, cargo manifest sheet are not exported 1998] from the same port on the same air- line, separate export entries on Cus- § 122.118 Exportation from port of ar- toms Form 7512, as required by § 18.25 of rival.
Recommended publications
  • Shipbuilding & Ocean Development Business Operation

    Shipbuilding & Ocean Development Business Operation

    Shipbuilding & Ocean Development Business Operation June 4, 2009 Shiro Iijima Director, Executive Vice President, General Manager, Shipbuilding & Ocean development Headquarters 1 Contents 1. FY2008 Overview -3 2. Shipbuilding & Ocean Development - 4 Business Environment 3. FY2009 Earnings Outlook -7 4. Outline of FY2009 Measures -8 5. Company-wide Special Measure -9 “Challenge 09” 6. Restructuring of Business Strategies -10 (Headquarters Business Plan) 2 1. FY2008 Overview Order Receipt Net sales Operating Profits • After Lehman shock, no ・Ship deliveries: 23 (+1 YoY) • Bottom line improved, new orders for Car carrier: 10 but profits were eroded commercial-use ships LNG carrier: 5 by provision for losses LPG carrier: 1 in ordered work arising • Public-sector orders held at normal level Container carrier: 2 from yen appreciation Patrol boat: 2 and higher prices for • Ships ordered: 18 (-14 YoY) Ferry: 1 steel, and other materials. 1H: 16 Others: 2 2H: 2 (public sector) ・Sales o par with previous 5-yr average Initial FY2008 target Previous 5-yr average: 320.4 JPY240.7 billion (JPY billion) (2003~2007) Decline in orders for (JPY billion) (JPY billion) commercial ships 353.6 271.3 283.9 240.1 4.0 1.6 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 3 2. Shipbuilding & Ocean Development Business Environment Lehman shock has caused major changes in marine transport and shipbuilding industries. 1) Marine transport industry <Seaborne cargo volume (actual and forecast)> 100億トン million ton <Before Lehman shock> 140 ・Increased seaborne cargoes ⇒ Tonnage shortages
  • Legal and Economic Analysis of Tramp Maritime Services

    Legal and Economic Analysis of Tramp Maritime Services

    EU Report COMP/2006/D2/002 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES Submitted to: European Commission Competition Directorate-General (DG COMP) 70, rue Joseph II B-1000 BRUSSELS Belgium For the Attention of Mrs Maria José Bicho Acting Head of Unit D.2 "Transport" Prepared by: Fearnley Consultants AS Fearnley Consultants AS Grev Wedels Plass 9 N-0107 OSLO, Norway Phone: +47 2293 6000 Fax: +47 2293 6110 www.fearnresearch.com In Association with: 22 February 2007 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES DISCLAIMER This report was produced by Fearnley Consultants AS, Global Insight and Holman Fenwick & Willan for the European Commission, Competition DG and represents its authors' views on the subject matter. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or DG Competition's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © European Communities, 2007 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The consultants would like to thank all those involved in the compilation of this Report, including the various members of their staff (in particular Lars Erik Hansen of Fearnleys, Maria Bertram of Global Insight, Maria Hempel, Guy Main and Cécile Schlub of Holman Fenwick & Willan) who devoted considerable time and effort over and above the working day to the project, and all others who were consulted and whose knowledge and experience of the industry proved invaluable.
  • 1Judge John Holland and the Vice- Admiralty Court of the Cape of Good Hope, 1797-1803: Some Introductory and Biographical Notes (Part 1)

    1Judge John Holland and the Vice- Admiralty Court of the Cape of Good Hope, 1797-1803: Some Introductory and Biographical Notes (Part 1)

    1JUDGE JOHN HOLLAND AND THE VICE- ADMIRALTY COURT OF THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE, 1797-1803: SOME INTRODUCTORY AND BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES (PART 1) JP van Niekerk* ABSTRACT A British Vice-Admiralty Court operated at the Cape of Good Hope from 1797 until 1803. It determined both Prize causes and (a few) Instance causes. This Court, headed by a single judge, should be distinguished from the ad hoc Piracy Court, comprised of seven members of which the Admiralty judge was one, which sat twice during this period, and also from the occasional naval courts martial which were called at the Cape. The Vice-Admiralty Court’s judge, John Holland, and its main officials and practitioners were sent out from Britain. Key words: Vice-Admiralty Court; Cape of Good Hope; First British Occupation of the Cape; jurisdiction; Piracy Court; naval courts martial; Judge John Holland; other officials, practitioners and support staff of the Vice-Admiralty Court * Professor, Department of Mercantile Law, School of Law, University of South Africa. Fundamina DOI: 10.17159/2411-7870/2017/v23n2a8 Volume 23 | Number 2 | 2017 Print ISSN 1021-545X/ Online ISSN 2411-7870 pp 176-210 176 JUDGE JOHN HOLLAND AND THE VICE-ADMIRALTY COURT OF THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE 1 Introduction When the 988 ton, triple-decker HCS Belvedere, under the command of Captain Charles Christie,1 arrived at the Cape on Saturday 3 February 1798 on her fifth voyage to the East, she had on board a man whose arrival was eagerly anticipated locally in both naval and legal circles. He was the first British judicial appointment to the recently acquired settlement and was to serve as judge of the newly created Vice-Admiralty Court of the Cape of Good Hope.
  • Advance Manifest

    Advance Manifest

    Bureau of Customs and Border Protection CBP Decisions 19 CFR PARTS 4, 103, 113, 122, 123, 178 AND 192 (CBP Dec. 03–32) RIN 1651–AA49 REQUIRED ADVANCE ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION OF CARGO INFORMATION AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs Regulations to provide that the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) must receive, by way of a CBP-approved electronic data interchange system, information pertaining to cargo before the cargo is either brought into or sent from the United States by any mode of commer- cial transportation (sea, air, rail or truck). The cargo information re- quired is that which is reasonably necessary to enable high-risk shipments to be identified for purposes of ensuring cargo safety and security and preventing smuggling pursuant to the laws enforced and administered by CBP. These regulations are specifically in- tended to effectuate the provisions of section 343(a) of the Trade Act of 2002, as amended by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002. DATES: This rule is effective January 5, 2004. The compliance dates for these regulations are set forth, as appli- cable, in §§ 4.7(b)(5), 122.48a(e), 123.91(e), 123.92(e), and 192.14(e). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Legal matters: Glen E. Vereb, Office of Regulations and Rulings, 202–572–8724; Trade compliance issues: Inbound vessel cargo: Kimberly Nott, Field Operations, 202–927– 0042; 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 37, NO. 52, DECEMBER 24, 2003 Inbound air cargo: David M. King, Field Operations, 202–927– 1133; Inbound truck cargo: Enrique Tamayo, Field Operations, 202– 927–3112; Inbound rail cargo: Juan Cancio-Bello, Field Operations, 202–927– 3459; Outbound cargo, all modes: Robert Rawls, Field Operations, 202– 927–5301.
  • Ace Cargo Manifest/In-Bond/Entry Status Query

    Ace Cargo Manifest/In-Bond/Entry Status Query

    ACE ABI CATAIR - Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements (CATAIR) Implementation Guide ACE CARGO MANIFEST/IN-BOND/ENTRY STATUS QUERY March 2020 March 31, 2020ACE Cargo Manifest/In-bond/Entry Status QueryACMQ-0 Pub # 0875-0419 ACE ABI CATAIR - Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements ACE CARGO MANIFEST/IN- BOND/ENTRY STATUS QUERY This chapter provides record formats that allow entry processing results, bills of lading and in-bonds to be queried. Table of Contents Table of Changes ........................................................................................................................... 4 Links to Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 9 Cargo Manifest/In-bond/Entry Status Query .......................................................................... 10 CURRENT ENTRY STATUS NOTIFICATION .................................................ACMQ-10 The current status of an entry can be queried and the processing results returned to the filer. Individual in-bonds, ocean/rail/truck bills and air waybills may also be queried. RECORD DESCRIPTIONS Record Identifier WR1 (Input) .................. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ACMQ-11 A mandatory entry, in-bond or bill query input record that requests processing results by entry number, and information by in-bond, bill of lading or air waybill number. Record Identifier WR0 (Output)
  • Documents of the Shipping Transport: Historical Origins, Legal Validity & Commercial Practice

    Documents of the Shipping Transport: Historical Origins, Legal Validity & Commercial Practice

    Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering 10 (2020) 47-56 Doi: 10.17265/2159-5879/2020.02.005 D DAVID PUBLISHING Documents of the Shipping Transport: Historical Origins, Legal Validity & Commercial Practice Ioannis Voudouris, and Evi Plomaritou Frederick University, Cyprus Abstract: The bill of lading and charterparty are vital for international trade and transport. To signify their enduring importance, this paper firstly seeks to illuminate the earliest historical evidence relating to the bill of lading and charterparty, and secondly, discuss their current legal and commercial nature and functions as well as their relationship with other transport documents such as the booking note, cargo manifest, mate’s receipt, and delivery order. In this context, the paper examines the lifecycle of transport as regards the documents used in the bulk and liner markets. Key words: Bill of lading, charterparty, sea waybill, booking note, delivery order, Mate’s receipt, Cargo manifest. 1. Introduction upon their shipment on board the ship (shipped bill of lading). The most important documents governing the commercial and legal relationships between the parties 2. Historical Origins of the Bill of Lading, in international sea transport are the bill of lading and Charterparty, Sea Waybill and Other the charterparty. Among other things, these Transport Documents documents define the obligations as well as the The (non-negotiable) sea waybill and the respective costs and earnings of the contracting parties, (negotiable) bill of lading are nowadays the primarily the shipowner or carrier and the charterer or best-known ocean transport documents that are still in shipper. In addition, other documents, such as booking use.
  • Unit-Iii/Trade Documentation/Ii B.A. Economics (Em) I

    Unit-Iii/Trade Documentation/Ii B.A. Economics (Em) I

    UNIT-III/TRADE DOCUMENTATION/II B.A. ECONOMICS (EM) I. TRANSPORT DOCUMENTATION & ITS IMPORTANCE IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE Those exporters (or potential exporters) who are not fully familiarized with the nuances of international trade transactions may be unaware of the importance that transport documentation represents. To explain it, let’s start with the basics. In this sense, an analogy with post service is useful. Let’s think of the document as a person who is mailing a package. This person goes to the post office, and hands over the package. The postal worker looks at the package, and verifies its condition, ensuring that it is properly sealed and suitable for shipping. The postal worker then weighs it and measures it to determine the shipping cost. Once the shipping costs have been paid, the sender receives a receipt (an airway bill or print receipt) with the corresponding breakdown of what was paid for. This creates duties and responsibilities for the postal service, because they must now deliver the package to the correct location, and only to the person named as the recipient. Also, as specified on this receipt, the sender is to receive a notice that the package was received. The postal service retains a copy of the airway bill or receipt, which indicates the specific recipient to receive the package, with the right to receive the package, as designated by the sender. That package can only be delivered to the recipient, as indicated on the receipt. How does this example of sending a package from the post office relate to that of an international export transaction, where we are no longer talking about a single package but rather a full container of merchandise, with a declared value of several thousand dollars or more.
  • Privateering in the Colonial Chesapeake

    Privateering in the Colonial Chesapeake

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1989 Privateering in the Colonial Chesapeake David Alan Lester College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Lester, David Alan, "Privateering in the Colonial Chesapeake" (1989). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625540. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-vcme-3217 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRIVATEERING IN THE COLONIAL CHESAPEAKE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by David Lester 1989 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts • /!// r (a Author Approved, August 1989 A xLuUL James L. Axtell Thaddeus W. Tate 'ames P. Whittenburg ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ................................................ iv INTRODUCTION ........................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE ECONOMICS OF PRIVATEERING ............. 4 CHAPTER II. THE REGULATION OF PRIVATEERING ............ 2 4 CONCLUSION .............................................. 50 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................... .. 5 7 iii ABSTRACT This study focuses on the economic and legal aspects of the involvement of privately owned vessels from the Chesapeake Bay region in maritime warfare from their first use through the Revolution.
  • Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental Pre-Tax Profi T Basic EPS Group Revenue £M

    Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental Pre-Tax Profi T Basic EPS Group Revenue £M

    Braemar Shipping Services plc Annual Report 2010 Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental Pre-tax profi t Basic EPS Group revenue £m 10 119.0 09 127.1 £13.5m 47.93p 08 101.0 2009: £16.2m 2009: 56.70p 07 73.8 06 60.8 Cash Cash generation Adjusted earnings per share pence* 10 47.93 09 56.70 £27.9m £15.3m 08 48.99 2009: £25.2m 2009: £21.0m 07 36.90 06 36.85 Final dividend 12 month forward order book Adjusted profi t before tax £m* 10 13.5 09 16.2 16.25p £28.0m 08 14.7 Full year: 25.0p 2009: £29.0m 07 11.0 06 10.3 Dividends pence 10 25.0 09 24.0 08 23.0 07 19.0 06 18.0 * Profi ts and earnings in 2007 are adjusted to exclude an exceptional impairment charge Shipbroking + Technical + In 2010 the Group’s The newly established cargo shipbroking division sold a adjusting business, Braemar record number of ships in the Marine has established a secondhand sector including presence in 5 countries and 85 vessels for demolition and the newly opened offi ce of recycling making the year Wavespec in Houston is one of the most successful. providing LNG consultancy services in the USA. For more information: www.braemarplc.com The Group is divided into four Contents Operations of Review 2010 operating divisions: Shipbroking, 2010 Review of operations Technical, Logistics and Environmental. Highlights 02 Overview 04 International presence These work together to offer a unique 06 Chairman’s statement 08 Chief Executive’s review combination of skills for clients, at any 20 Corporate social responsibility report time, anywhere in the world.
  • Instructions for Completing the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest

    Instructions for Completing the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest

    Hazardous Waste Manifest Instructions What are the instructions for completing the manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22)? Read all instructions before completing the form. 1. Federal regulations require generators and transporters of hazardous waste and owners or operators of receiving facilities designated on the manifest to complete this form (EPA Form 8700–22) and, if necessary, the continuation sheet (EPA Form 8700–22A) for both inter- and intrastate transportation of hazardous waste. 2. This manifest reflects formatting changes made by U.S. EPA in December 2017. Beginning on June 30, 2018, this manifest (Revision 12-17) must be used and all previous editions are prohibited. Go to www.epa.gov/e-manifest for additional information. 3. This form must be purchased from a registered printer (https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/approved-registered-printers-epas-manifest- registry#how) and has been designed to be filled out using standard computer printers; a firm point pen may also be used—press down hard. After June 30, 2018, this form can also be completed electronically in EPA’s e-Manifest system. I. Instructions for Generators Item 1. Generator’s U.S. EPA Identification Number Enter the generator’s U.S. EPA twelve-digit identification number, or the state generator identification number if the generator site does not have an EPA identification number. Item 2. Page 1 of ___ Enter the total number of pages used to complete the manifest (i.e., the first page (EPA Form 8700-22) plus the number of continuation sheets (EPA Form 8700-22A), if any). Item 3. Emergency Response Phone Number Enter a phone number for which emergency response information can be obtained in the event of an incident during transportation.
  • Agricultural Export Transportation Handbook

    Agricultural Export Transportation Handbook

    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Export Agricultural Marketing Service Transportation Agriculture Handbook 700 Handbook United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Export Agricultural Marketing Service Transportation Handbook by Ellen M. Welby and Brian McGregor Transportation Services Branch Transportation and Marketing Programs Agricultural Marketing Service Web site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/tmd/export/index.htm Revised February 2004 Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to Robert Neenan and Kate Healey, formerly of AMS, Transportation and Marketing Programs; Mary E. Lassanyi, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library; David Enberg, J.E. Lowden & Co.; Karen Lowe, Firstar Bank; and Oscar A. Lopez, Overseas Shipping Company. The authors acknowledge the Agriculture Ocean Transportation Coalition, Air Transport Association of America, Bureau of the Census, Marine Office of America Corp., Maersk Sealand, Inc., U.S. Department of Transportation, and USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service for their assistance. Preferred Citation Welby, Ellen M., and Brian McGregor. Agricultural Export Transportation Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, February 2004. Web <http://dx.doi.org/10.9752/TS022.02-2004> This handbook provides a compilation of best industry practices, and its recommendations have been shown to be effective under normal conditions. Mention of companies or commercial products does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status.
  • Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental

    Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental

    Braemar Shipping Services plc Annual Report 2009 Shipbroking + Technical + Logistics + Environmental At any moment in time, The Group is divided into across the globe, Braemar’s four operating divisions: businesses are ensuring Shipbroking, Technical, that goods and materials Logistics and Environmental. are delivered effi ciently and These work together to offer a safely for their clients. unique combination of skills for clients, at any time, anywhere Our clients are located all over in the world. the world and we serve them from an international network Braemar is constantly looking of offi ces. for new ways to help clients by expanding geographically and by adding complementary services that make us an increasingly valuable partner. -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Contents GMT-6 1 Highlights 2 How our business works Houston 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Chief Executive’s review Braemar Steege receives 58% 18 Financial review more instructions 20 Board of Directors 21 Report of the Directors 26 Corporate Governance 29 Remuneration Report 33 Independent auditors’ report 34 Consolidated income statement 35 Balance sheets 36 Cash fl ow statements 37 Statements of changes in equity 38 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 64 Five year fi nancial summary 66 Shareholder information 67 Offi ces and contacts For more information: www.braemarplc.com Highlights Results for the year ended 28 February 2009 Pre-tax profi t Cash generated from Adjusted profi t before tax £m* Adjusted earnings per share pence Up 10% operating activities 09